You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in German. (January 2022) Click [show] for important translation instructions.
View a machine-translated version of the German article.
Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia.
Consider adding a topic to this template: there are already 2,093 articles in the main category, and specifying|topic= will aid in categorization.
Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing German Wikipedia article at [[:de:Organon Modell]]; see its history for attribution.
You may also add the template {{Translated|de|Organon Modell}} to the talk page.
The organon model is a model of communication by German psychologist and linguistKarl Ludwig Bühler (1879 – 1963). It was published in German in 1934.[1] and not translated into English until 1990.[2] In it he defined the functions of communication according to which linguistic communication can be described. Bühler's work influenced the communication model of Roman Jakobson.[3]
Buhler's model also apparently influenced Lev Vygotsky who, in discussing memory and goal-directed learning, wrote: "According to K. Buhler, speech thinks for us."[4]: 449, 453
Bühler identified the following three communicative functions:
the expressive function (Ausdrucksfunktion)
the representation function (Darstellungsfunktion)
the conative function (Appellfunktion, i.e. appealing function).
Background
Karl Bühler used the Cratylus of Plato as the basis for his remarks. Here, Socrates refers to the word as an Ancient Greek: ὄργανον, romanized: órganon, lit. 'instrument, tool, organ', and thus to language as a whole as a tool, with which a person can communicate something to others about things. Bühler described this relationship as a 'three-foundations scheme': oneself - to the other - about things (einer - dem anderen - über die Dinge).[1]: 24
Bühler's organon model criticized the material thinking of behaviorism, which according to him had renewed the "flatus-vocisnominalism of the incipient Middle Ages in modern form."[1]: 27
As a semiotic model
Hartmut Stöckl described the Organon model as a semiotic model, comparing it to Aristotle's triad of pathos, logos, and ethos.[5] He wrote:
[Bühler’s] model acknowledges “the essential rhetorical fact that any sign use must in effect express the ethos of the rhetor, represent their rational take on the world (logos) and appeal to the emotional mindset of an envisaged audience (pathos).”
— Stöckl, Tracing the shapes of multimodal rhetoric
^ abKarl Bühler (1990) [1934]. The Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language (Sprachtheorie). Translated by Donald Fraser Goodwin. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. ISSN0168-2555.
^Lev Vygotsky (1960). Проблема развития и распада высших психических функций [On the development and degradation of the higher psychological functions].
