This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,445 pending submissions waiting for review.
A type of partial category
Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,445 pending submissions waiting for review.
If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space.
If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here.
In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
This draft provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please see the guide to writing better articles for how to improve your writing.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.
Comment: This may be a notable topic, but the article provides almost no background for readers who aren't versed in the topic. Please provide a general introduction as a lead section. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:08, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
A neocategory (Ehresmann, who introduced this notion, called it a multiplicative graph [in French: graphe multiplicatif]
[1]) is a generalization of an ordinary category in which associative law of composition is weakened to a partial law of composition. While an ordinary category is a concept combining a directed graph and a monoidal structure, a neocategory is a partial magma-like structure. Namely, it is a structure in one‑to‑one correspondence with the nodes of a directed graph, and is equipped with partial law of composition that satisfies only left and right identities.[1] Cury is studying enriched neocategories under the term graphe multiplicatif enrichi.[2] As a more general notion, there is the compositional graph, and neocategories can be seen as strongly identitive composition graphs.[3]
This notion first appears in Ehresmann's book Catégories et structures. For the notion of a sketch which he himself introduced, Ehresmann needed to define a category-like structure that avoided redundant axioms as much as possible.[4] This structure is the neocategory, and this is a type of relaxed notion of category, such as a semicategory.
Definition
For comparison, a typical ordinary category is shown in the diagram. If there is no composition of arrows, it is simply a directed graph. In an ordinary category, the composition of any pair of consecutive arrows exists, whereas in a neocategory, a pair of consecutive arrows is not necessarily composable.[5]
A neocategory is couple formed by a set denoted by , and a partial law of composition on satisfying the following axioms:[6][1]
is a mapping from a subset of (denoted by and called the set of composable couples) into ; instead of , we write and we call the composite of .
There exists a graph (i.e. and are retractions from onto a subset of , denoted by ), such that:
(existence of units[7][8]): For each element of , the composites and are defined, and we have
Here, is the right identity of and is called the source of , while is the left identity of and is called the target of ;
(coherence of dom/cod[9][8]): If the composite is defined, then:
From the condition 2, the graph is uniquely defined.
Example
An ordinary category is a neocategory in which all the couples where are composable (so that is the pullback of ), the law of composition being furthermore associative.[10][1]
^Ehresmann 1965, ch. I, §.B) Graphes multiplicatifs et catègories. For the definition of "classe multiplicative", see ch. I, § A) Classes multiplicatives.
Ehresmann, Charles (1969). "Construction de structures libres". Category Theory, Homology Theory and their Applications II. Lecture Notes in Mathematics (in French). Vol. 92. pp. 74–104. doi:10.1007/BFb0080766. ISBN978-3-540-04611-0.
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.