Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. …
Submission declined on 15 December 2025 by MCE89 (talk).
provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.
Comment: Much of this draft is sourced to Equisoft's own publications, press releases, and primary sources. A Wikipedia article should instead be a summary of what independent secondary sources have said about this company. MCE89 (talk) 19:58, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment: In accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, I disclose that I have been paid by my employer for my contributions to this article. Elcapitan68 (talk) 19:52, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
Software company for the insurance and wealth management sectors.
Equisoft.[1] is a Canada-based software company that designs and develops digital solutions for the insurance and wealth management sectors.
History
Equisoft was established in Montreal (Quebec) in 1994[2] and focused on software development for the life insurance industry[3]. In the early 2000s, the company released several products tailored to the life insurance and financial services sectors, and aimed at policy administration, the digitalization of front-end tools, and financial planning[4], including Equisoft/analyze (2002), Equisoft/illustrate (2010)[5], Equisoft/manage (2018)[6].
Key acquisitions include Universal Conversion Technologies (UCT)[7] in 2016, Kronos Technologies[7] in 2018, AGEman Solutions[8] and Grendel[9] in 2019, Altus Business Systems[10] in 2021, CompuOffice Software[11] in 2023, and VisCalc[12][13] in 2025.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Equisoft’s solutions allowed clients to submit e-applications, streamline policy administration, and manage customer records remotely[14].
As of 2023, Equisoft’s offerings included SaaS policy administration, CRM, financial needs analysis, financial planning, asset allocation, fund and portfolio analysis, quotes and illustrations, electronic application systems, agency management systems, and customer, agent, and broker portals[15].
Equisoft grew to about 900 staff by mid‑2024 through capital infusions, organic growth, and strategic acquisitions[15].
Equisoft was named by CNBC as one of “The World’s Top 150 InsurTech Companies: 2024” in the Policy Administration & AdminTech category[16].
In October 2025, Equisoft announced the launch of its new Equisoft/amplify suite of AI-enabled components aimed at leveraging operational intelligence by combining market and performance analytics with insurance-specific AI agents and workflows[17].
Client Segments
The company’s customer model includes:
Type of Client
Offering
Institutional clients: insurers, distributors, fund companies, broker-dealers, and bancassurance partners.
End-to-end digital transformation products and services.
Individual clients: financial advisors, brokers, and managing general agents.
Front-end tools and cloud-based sales and productivity solutions.
Funding
Equisoft has secured capital through two significant equity rounds.
Integration of One Inc.’s PremiumPay platform into Equisoft’s policy administration system to provide modern options (Apple Pay, Google Pay, PayPal, Venmo)
According to Daily American (2021), Equisoft is Oracle’s largest and most experienced partner for the Oracle Insurance Policy Administration (OIPA) platform[34]
Trading Automation (for Administrators and for asset managers)
Equisoft/pay
Pension Payroll System
* Award-winning software
Research
In 2024, Equisoft commissioned the insurance research firm LIMRA[39], to produce Assessing Data Readiness for AI in the Life Insurance Industry Report[40]
According to the report:
78% of respondents consider data readiness the biggest challenge in getting value from AI. The other ones are ”Technology related problems in development” (54%) and ”Struggling to scale across use cases” (43%).[40]
Although most companies self-rated as “progressive” in their perceived data maturity, 46% admitted they were not yet prepared to deploy AI solutions.[40]
87% of respondents currently employ AI in areas such as underwriting, operations, and new business processes.[40]
^"Equisoft". Trade Marks Journal. 58 (2968): 83. September 14, 2011. Retrieved December 11, 2025.
^ abMonks, Karen; Raymond, Keith (November 30, 2020). "Life Insurance Illustration Systems"(PDF). 2020 XCelent Awards (North American ed.). Celent. p. 16. Retrieved December 8, 2025.
“... in every one of those research reports, insurers state that their data is the single biggest challenge to successfully
implementing AI.“ page 3
“78% of respondents consider Data Readiness the biggest challenge in getting value from AI. 46% of respondents felt they were
either “Not Really Ready“ or “Not At All Ready“ to implement AI given their current state of Data Readiness. Globally, life insurance carriers are “Progressive“ in their Data Readiness for AI.“ page 10
“87% of responding companies are currently using AI in one or more operational areas.“ page 30
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.