The type species of Brachychampsa is B. montana, first discovered from the Hell Creek Formation of Montana and described by Charles W. Gilmore in a paper in 1911. In that same paper, Gilmore recombined Bottosaurus perrugosus as a new species of Brachychampsa, called B. perrugosus.[2] The holotype specimen of B. perrugosus went missing as the paper was being written, but it was later rediscovered and soon afterward designated as a nomen dubium due to a lack of diagnostic features that distinguish it from other alligatorids discovered since the paper was published.[11] Another species from the Allison Member of the Menefee Formation of the San Juan Basin, B. sealeyi, was discovered in 1996,[3] but was later argued to be synonymous with B. montana by interpreting it as an immature specimen of the latter species.[12] However, other studies have shown that some of the variation seen between the two species, such as the orientation of the maxillary tooth row, are not ontogenic, thus making B. sealeyi a valid taxon.[13]
Phylogeny
Brachychampsa's position within Alligatoroidea has undergone many revisions since it was first named. Originally it was placed within Alligatoridae, and was later refined to the Alligatorinae in 1964,[5] only to be placed outside both Alligatorinae and Alligatoridae (but still within Alligatoroidea) in 1994.[11] Accordingly, studies have shown Brachychampsa as a basal member of Alligatoroidea, within the cladeGlobidonta,[14][15] as shown in the cladogram below.[15]
Alternatively, other phylogenetic studies have recovered Brachychampsa as an alligatorid, specifically as a stem-caiman,[16][17] as shown in the cladogram below.[16]
Brachychampsa's dentition was heterodont, with conical teeth at the front and bulbous teeth at the back.[19] It has been regarded as a specialist hunter of turtles, based on its rostral shape, massive dentary, and dental morphology,[20] though this has been challenged over the years. A more generalist diet of small invertebrates and vertebrates has also been proposed.[21] In 2003, Robert M. Sullivan and Spencer G. Lucas observed that most late Cretaceous turtles were probably too big for consumption, and that if they did represent a large portion of Brachychampsa's diet, it would have had to hunt either juveniles or smaller turtle species.[22]
^ abEstes, R. (1964). "Fossil vertebrates from the Late Cretaceous Lance Formation, eastern Wyoming". University of California Publications in Geological Sciences. 49: 1–180.
^Estes, R.; Berberian, P. (1970). "Paleoecology of a Late Cretaceous vertebrate community from Montana". Breviora. 343: 1–35.
^Bryant, L. J. (1989). "Non-dinosaurian lower vertebrates across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary in northeastern Montana". University of California Publications in Geological Sciences. 134: 1–107.
^Pearson, Dean A.; Schaefer, Terry; Johnson, Kirk R.; Nichols, Douglas J.; Hunter, John P. (2002). "Vertebrate biostratigraphy of the Hell Creek Formation in southwestern North Dakota and northwestern South Dakota". In Hartman, Joseph Herbert; Johnson, Kirk. R.; Nichols, Douglas J. (eds.). The Hell Creek Formation and the Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary in the Northern Great Plains. An Integrated Continental Record of the End of the Cretaceous. Vol. 361. Geological Society of America. pp. 145–167. doi:10.1130/0-8137-2361-2.145. ISBN9780813723617.
^Averianov, A.; Nessov, L. (1995). "A new Cretaceous mammal from the Campanian of Kazakhstan". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - Monatshefte. 2: 65–74. doi:10.1127/njgpm/1995/1995/65.
^Martin, J.E.; Delfino, M. (2010). "Recent advances in the comprehension of the biogeography of Cretaceous European eusuchians". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 293 (3): 406–418. Bibcode:2010PPP...293..406M. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.10.021.
^ abNorell, M. A.; Clark, J. M.; Hutchison, J. H. (1994). "The Late Cretaceous alligatoroid Brachychampsa montana (Crocodylia): new material and putative relationships". American Museum Novitates (3116): 1–26.
^Walter J, Darlim G, Massonne T, Aase A, Frey E, Rabi M (2022). "On the origin of Caimaninae: insights from new fossils of Tsoabichi greenriverensis and a review of the evidence". Historical Biology. 34 (4): 580–595. doi:10.1080/08912963.2021.1938563. S2CID238723638.