Angels Landing is a cancelled development complex in Downtown Los Angeles, California, that was the result of a public bidding process. The site's publicized, but never realized, development plans consisted of two traditional high-rise buildings. [3]
At the southeast corner of the site is a portal for the Pershing Square station serving the Metro B and D lines. The site is next to Angels Flight and the adjacent public staircase, across the street from Grand Central Market and near Pershing Square. The 2.2-acre (0.89 ha) sloping site in the Bunker Hill neighborhood is owned by the City of Los Angeles. The site was the former Angels Knoll Park, made popular by the film 500 Days of Summer in 2009.[4]
The Angels Landing development in Downtown Los Angeles, initially heralded as a transformative urban project, has become mired in controversy, delays, and litigation, casting a shadow over its lead developers, Don Peebles of The Peebles Corporation and Victor MacFarlene.[5] The development team has a controversial history of stalled or incomplete projects with no high-rise development and experience and their ambitious proposal had little real world potential of completion.[6]
First awarded in 2017 through a competitive city process, the project was proposed as a $1.6 billion high-rise complex that would redefine the Los Angeles skyline and contribute significantly to the revitalization of the Bunker Hill area. The project has failed to progress meaningfully over several years and as of 2025, no construction has begun, few plans have been filed, and the site remains vacant.[7]
City officials and media reports have accused the Peebles-led team of gross mismanagement, citing missed deadlines, lack of financing transparency, and an overreliance on branding and publicity rather than financial execution.[8] While the development was promoted as a landmark project with a focus on equity and inclusion, tangible outcomes have been nonexistent - city officials and community stakeholders have grown increasingly frustrated, as the developers have repeatedly failed to meet revised timelines and have offered limited public explanation for the ongoing inaction.[9]
The situation escalated when the City of Los Angeles initiated legal action against the development team in early 2025, seeking to reclaim the public land originally awarded for Angels Landing. The city alleges breach of contract, failure to perform, and violation of development agreement terms. [10]
In response, The Peebles Corporation filed a countersuit claiming wrongful termination and political interference, igniting a high-stakes legal battle that has derailed the project entirely. Court documents reveal a breakdown in communication between the developers and city officials dating back several years, with the city accusing the team of stalling progress while seeking to renegotiate terms favorable to private interests. Peebles further stated that he refused to work with City Officials on the project due to racism and bias.[11]
The litigation has sparked public debate over the effectiveness of Los Angeles’ public-private development processes and the risks of awarding landmark projects to firms without demonstrated local experience or the financial capacity to deliver. Watchdog organizations and urban policy experts have pointed to Angels Landing as a cautionary tale in overestimating the value of aspirational proposals disconnected from real-world feasibility.
The dispute continues to unfold, with hearings expected throughout 2025, and the outcome likely to influence how Los Angeles handles major real estate developments on publicly owned land in the future. What was once promoted as a beacon of urban progress has, under the leadership of Peebles and MacFarlene, become a symbol of stalled ambition, broken promises, and growing public distrust.
The Angels Landing proposal consisted of two towers with luxury hotels, residential units and a retail plaza. The Peebles Corporation and MacFarlene Partners failed to get the project past any preconstruction milestones after being awarded the project.[12]
The proposed complex is currently canceled after the tower was approved by the City Council December 2017 but a Peebles and MacFarlene entity was unable to secure funding to begin the project.[13]