Antitrust case alleging Google illegally dominates digital advertising
This article is about the antitrust suit targeting Google's digital advertising practices. For the suit targeting Google's search engine practices, see United States v. Google LLC (2020). For other lawsuits, see United States v. Google.
United States, Commonwealth of Virginia, State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of New Jersey, State of New York, State of Rhode Island and State of Tennessee v. Google LLC
Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the suit aims to force Google to sell off significant portions of adtech business and require the company to cease certain business practices.[3] The trial began on September 9, 2024.[4]
Background
Growth of Google's adtech business
Beginning in the 2000s, Google gradually increased its presence in the adtech market, with the company acquiring DoubleClick, Invite Media, and AdMeld.[5] The acquisition of DoubleClick received criticism from privacy groups including the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), who petitioned the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to scrutinize the deal.[6] The FTC ultimately approved the $3.1 billion acquisition of DoubleClick in December 2007.[7]
By 2021, Google's adtech division was the company's second largest business behind Google Search, generating approximately $31.7 billion in revenue for the company.[3] As of 2023, Google's advertising business generated an estimated 80% of the company's revenue.[8]
In August 2024, following a ruling by Judge Amit P. Mehta that Google monopolized the online search market, the Justice Department began considering remedies, including a potential breakup of Google’s business units like Chrome and Android, and other measures to curb Google’s dominance in AI products and online advertising. The DOJ is also contemplating enforcing measures that would prevent Google from maintaining exclusive contracts and might require the company to divest certain assets or share its data with competitors, particularly in the online search and advertising sectors.[10][11][12]
The ruling against Google is seen as a significant win for antitrust enforcement in the U.S., setting a precedent for how the government might tackle monopolistic practices in the tech industry. Analysts suggest that the potential remedies could have a profound impact on the digital advertising landscape and the broader tech ecosystem.[15]
Early proceedings (2023-2024)
Following the filing of the lawsuit, the DOJ claimed it has documentation that would bolster its case. This includes an alleged statement by a Google advertising executive who took issue with the company "owning the platform, the exchange and a huge network", who compared it to if Goldman Sachs or Citibank owned the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).[3] In what has been described as an unconventional move for a federal antitrust lawsuit, the DOJ has pushed for a jury trial for the case.[16]
In March 2023, judge Leonie Brinkema denied Google's request to move the lawsuit from the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to a venue in New York, which is considered a more favorable venue for Google.[17] In March 2023, Google filed a motion to dismiss the case.[18] Brinkema denied this request in April 2023, who stated that the DOJ's initial complaint sufficiently detailed for the case to proceed.[5][19]
In August 2023, Google's pushed for the recusal of Assistant Attorney General Kanter from the case, arguing Kanter's past representation of Google's rivals in private practice meant he was unfairly biased against the company.[20] Brinkema denied Google's effort to force Kanter's recusal in September 2023, describing the company's bias claims as "essentially a red herring defense".[21]
In February 2024, it was announced that the case would begin trial on September 9, 2024.[22] Following a dispute between the DOJ and Google in the 2023 search trial regarding the release of public exhibits pertaining to the case, Brinkema urged both parties to resolve any similar dispute ahead of the 2024 trial.[23]
On April 26, 2024, Google filed a motion seeking summary judgement in the case. In the motion, Google accused the DOJ's of improperly calculating Google's share of the digital advertising market.[24]
On May 16, 2024, Google asked the court to strike the jury trial demand made by the DOJ, as they had compensated all U.S plaintiffs for the appropriate damages.[25] After hearing from both sides, the court ruled in favor of Google, ordering for the trial to take place before a magistrate judge instead of a jury.[26]
The trial began before Judge Brinkema on September 9, 2024, and is expected to last for several weeks.[4] In opening arguments, lead DOJ attorney Julia Tarver Wood said that Google had used its acquisitions of ad software companies like DoubleClick and AdMeld to shore up an 87% market share in the ad-selling industry, stifling competition and hurting both consumers and publishers in the process.[29] Wood further claimed that Google locks customers into using their products and controls how transactions are made within the ad-tech market.[30][31]
Google's lead attorney Karen Dunn countered by saying that people use Google's products simply due to the fact that they are "simple, affordable, and effective,"[32] and that case was an assault on essential tools that publishers and advertisers relied on.[33]
Week 1
The first week of the trial largely focused on how Google's ad-tech products worked together to conduct behind-the-scenes "millisecond ad auctions."[34] After opening arguments, prosecutors called Gannett executive Tim Wolfe to the stand as their first witness.[35] Wolfe testified that companies like Gannett feel as if they have "no choice" but to use Google's products, despite them knowing that they are on the losing end of the deal.[32] Prosecutors then called former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser to the stand, who said that the company in 2017 estimated that they would have lost around $9 million by moving away from Google's ad-tech products, raising an appearance of captivity on Google's end.[36][37] On September 11, court documents were presented that showed former Google executive David Rosenblatt telling his colleagues in 2009 that the goal for Google's online advertising business was to "crush" the competition.[38] These documents were then corroborated by former DoubleClick executive Brad Bender,[38] with witnesses also adding that Google's 20% ad revenue fee was the "highest in the industry."[39]
Internal documents further showed that Google knew that publishers would "balk" when it implemented measures in 2019 to prevent the diverting of profits to rival competitors,[40] with the DOJ attempting to illustrate that Google had ignored the preferences of its customers to strengthen their own business position.[41] These measures, witnesses testified, involved unified pricing rules and header bidding, a term for the process in which publishers skirted around Google's ad exchange auctions.[42] Trial testimony and documents showed that for years, Google had given its ad exchange, AdX, preferential treatment when it came to matching a publisher's proposed floor price.[34] Professor Ramamoorthi Ravi of Carnegie Mellon University testified that rules imposed by Google "seem to have been designed to advantage Google's own products."[34] Prosecutors also called Brian Boland, a former Facebook ad chief, who testified that Facebook initially had planned to challenge Google in the industry, but pulled out and instead made a deal with them in 2018 due to their conclusion that they wouldn't be able to compete.[43]
Week 2
On September 10, prosecutors called YouTube CEO Neal Mohan to the stand. In his testimony, Mohan refuted allegations of monopolist behavior by Google, saying that the company had "plenty of competition."[44] As Mohan testified, prosecutors presented documents that illustrated how Google acquired rival companies, "parked" them away, and monopolized the market to push out competition.[45] Prosecutors also similarly called former Google executives Jonathan Bellack and Nirmal Jayaram to the stand, who both sought to disavow and contradict emails they wrote in the past.[46] Bellack, when confronted with an email he wrote comparing Google's ad-tech business to "if Goldman or Citibank owned the NYSE (New York Stock Exchange)," dismissed his email as "late-night ramblings."[46] Jed Dederick, Chief Revenue Officer of The Trade Desk, described Google's actions as "draconian" and "absolutist."[47]
Prosecutors also sought to show that Google deliberately destroyed damning evidence, a problem that was levied at Google's first antitrust trial.[48][49] Former Google executive Chris LaSala testified on September 20 that Google's chat messages had history off "by default" and that business executives often referred to conversations as "privileged and confidential."[48] The prosecution rested its case shortly thereafter, after which Google began to mount its defense.[50] Scott Sheffer, Google's first witness, said that the ad tech industry "has been exceptionally fluid" and that it was vastly more complex and competitive than what the DOJ had portrayed it to be.[51]
Reaction and analysis
Lawmakers from both parties, including Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Josh Hawley (R-MO), spoke positively about the lawsuit.[52] Polling by YouGov in conjunction with The Economist found that Americans approved of the lawsuit by a 41% to 19% margin, with 40% stating they were "not sure".[53]
Google denied the DOJ's allegations, with a company spokesperson accusing the department of trying to unfairly "pick winners and losers in the highly competitive advertising technology sector."[54] The Chamber of Progress, a tech industry trade group whose membership includes Google, argued that the lawsuit is misguided amid a declining advertising market.[55]
Legal commentary
Commentators have argued that the basis of the DOJ's case is rooted in a relatively "traditional" interpretation of antitrust law, as opposed to more "novel" theories of anti-competitive harms associated with the New Brandeis movement.[56] The editorial board of The Washington Post praised the lawsuit as "good, old-fashioned antitrust enforcement" in a February 2023 article.[57]
William Kovacic, a former Republican member of the FTC, has argued that the suit is a serious one that "adds another important complication to Google's efforts to deal with regulators worldwide."[3]Douglas Melamed, who served in the DOJ Antitrust Division during the Clinton Administration, argued that the DOJ "would get a remedy that's going to shake up the market" if able to prove their claim in court. However, Melamed cautioned observers from assuming that the DOJ would win the case.[58]
Analysis of jury trial request
Commentary surrounding the DOJ's request for a jury trial in the lawsuit has often described the decision as unusually and potentially risky. A January 2023 article in Bloomberg News suggested that the "surprising request" was made due to DOJ concerns about a hostile judicial environment.[16] According to Harry First of the New York University School of Law, the DOJ's effort to "seek damages and demand a jury trial in a monopolization case is unprecedented".[59]
Related lawsuits
According to The New York Times, the lawsuit is the fifth antitrust suit filed against Google by either the federal government or states attorney general since 2020.[3] The DOJ filed a separate antitrust case in October 2020 accusing Google of unlawfully monopolizing the search market.[60] Google's dominant position in the adtech market has additionally received legal scrutiny in both the European Union and the United Kingdom.[61]
State of Texas v. Google, LLC (2020)
The case has been compared to a separate, state-led antitrust lawsuit targeting Google's adtech practices filed in 2020.[24][62] The aforementioned lawsuit, led by the Texas Attorney General's office, accuses Google of unlawfully abusing its dominance in digital advertising.[63]
In April 2024, the DOJ requested to file a statement of interest in the case during the discovery process.[64] The State of Texas v. Google, LLC is expected to go to trial in Plano, Texas on March 31, 2025 before judge Sean D. Jordan, and will be held over a four week period.[65]
^Bartz, Diane; Shepardson, David (January 24, 2023). "U.S. targets Google's online ad business monopoly in latest Big Tech lawsuit". Reuters. Retrieved April 28, 2024. Google, whose advertising business is responsible for about 80% of its revenue, said the government was "doubling down on a flawed argument that would slow innovation, raise advertising fees, and make it harder for thousands of small businesses and publishers to grow.
^Montoya, Karina (February 26, 2024). "The Countdown to the Google Ad Tech Trial Is On: Here's What You Need to Know". Tech Policy Press. Retrieved April 28, 2024. During the conference, which set the scene for what to expect before and during the trial, Judge Brinkema urged the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Google to solve any disputes about posting exhibits for the public record ahead of time, after acknowledging that disagreements over this matter in the Google Search case delayed both the trial and access to public records. "I do not want to see this same problem happen [...] This trial will not stop to resolve this [matter]," she said.
^Morrison, Sara (January 24, 2023). "Google's bad year is getting worse". Vox. Retrieved April 4, 2023. The Chamber of Progress, a Google-funded Big Tech advocacy group, said in a statement that the case was "disconnected from economic reality" and that Google's digital ad market share (estimated to be about 29 percent in 2022, giving it the largest share of any one company) was "at an all-time low.
^Marfin, Catherine (April 24, 2024). "DOJ Wants To Weigh In On Texas Google Ad Tech Discovery". Law360. Retrieved April 28, 2024. The U.S. Department of Justice asked a federal judge Wednesday for permission to file a statement of interest in a Texas-led lawsuit accusing Google of anticompetitive conduct in the display advertising market, writing that the states' request for certain discovery items may violate an order in a substantially similar suit the DOJ is pursuing in Virginia.
Map of Eswati diplomatic missions The Kingdom of Eswatini has a small population and maintains a small number of diplomatic missions. Notably, it is also the only African country that maintains relations with Taiwan, and as such has a resident embassy in Taipei. Honorary consulates are excluded from this listing. Current missions Africa Host country Host city Mission Concurrent accreditation Ref. Ethiopia Addis Ababa Embassy Countries: Algeria Israel Kenya Tanzan...
Legio X Equestris VeneriaBusto contemporaneo di Gaio Giulio Cesare Descrizione generaleAttivadal 90?[1]/58 a.C. al 46/45 a.C.;nel 44 a.C. è nuovamente costituita da Emilio Lepido[2] passando poi dalla parte di Antonio;dopo Azio confluisce nella X Gemina Tipoderiva forse da una legione della guerra sociale. CampiBibracte (Gallia Comata);Narbona (Gallia Narbonensis). Battaglie/guerre Guerra sociale? (91-88 a.C.) Conquista della Gallia (58-50 a.C.) Genava[3] (58 a.C.) fi...
Gabriel Marić Información personalNombre completo Vidosav MarićNombre de nacimiento 28 de junio de 1949Nombre nativo Видосав МарићNacimiento Višnjićevo, Šid (República Socialista de Serbia)Fallecimiento 21 de diciembre de 2017 (68 años)Monasterio de Privina Glava (Šid)Residencia Monasterio de Privina GlavaLengua materna SerbioEducaciónEducación Facultad de Filosofía de la Universidad de BelgradoInformación profesionalOcupación Archimandrita e higúmenoAños activo 2002
1818 — термін, який має кілька значень. Ця сторінка значень містить посилання на статті про кожне з них.Якщо ви потрапили сюди за внутрішнім посиланням, будь ласка, поверніться та виправте його так, щоб воно вказувало безпосередньо на потрібну статтю.@ пошук посилань саме с...
Visconde de Sacavém Criação D. Luís I30 de Julho de 1874 Tipo Vitalício – 1 vida1 renovação 1.º Titular José Joaquim Pinto da Silva Linhagem Pinto da Silva (Pinto da Silva Sacavém, Pinto Sacavém) Actual Titular Manuel José de Sousa Pinto Sacavém Visconde de Sacavém é um título nobiliárquico criado por D. Luís I de Portugal, por Decreto de 30 de Julho de 1874, em favor de José Joaquim Pinto da Silva.[1] Titulares José Joaquim Pinto da Silva, 1.° Visconde de Sacavém; Jos...
Pemilihan umum Presiden Siprus 20132008201817 dan 24 Februari 2013Kandidat Calon Nicos Anastasiades Stavros Malas Partai DISY AKEL Suara rakyat 236.965 175.267 Persentase 57,48% 42,52% Presiden petahanaDemetris Christofias AKEL Presiden terpilih Nicos Anastasiades DISY Sunting kotak info • L • BBantuan penggunaan templat ini Pemilihan umum presiden diselenggarakan di Siprus pada tanggal 17 Februari 2013 dan tidak ada calon yang memperoleh 50,00% suara dalam pemilu pu...
American TV series or program The LangoliersTitle card from the first episodeGenre Horror Mystery Science fiction Thriller Based onThe Langoliersby Stephen KingWritten byTom Holland (teleplay)Directed byTom HollandStarring Patricia Wettig Dean Stockwell David Morse Mark Lindsay Chapman Frankie Faison Baxter Harris Kimber Riddle Christopher Collet Kate Maberly Bronson Pinchot Music byVladimir HorunzhyCountry of originUnited StatesNo. of episodes2ProductionRunning time180 minutesProduction...
Part of a series onOrganised labour Labour movement Timeline New unionismProletariat Social movement unionism Social democracyDemocratic socialismSocialismCommunismSyndicalism Anarcho-syndicalismNational-syndicalism Labour rights Freedom of association Collective bargaining Child labour Unfree labour Equal pay Employment discrimination Legal working age Four-day week Sabbatical Eight-hour day Annual leave Paid time off Sick leave Minimum wage Occupational safety and health Employment protecti...
Board game introduced in 1988 This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: Girl Talk board game – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Girl TalkOther namesJentesnakk Secrets & Folie'sDesignersCatherine Rondeau[1]I...
Finn Kalvik (1995) Finn Kalvik (* 30. April 1947 in Fåvang) ist ein norwegischer Folk-Sänger und Komponist. Seine ersten Alben in den 1970er Jahren kletterten in die norwegischen Charts. Als Gewinner des Melodi Grand Prix 1981 durfte er beim Eurovision Song Contest 1981 für sein Land antreten. Mit seinem selbstgeschriebenen Folksong Aldri i Livet landete er allerdings auf dem letzten Platz mit Null Punkten. Trotz dieses Misserfolges blieb Kalvik weiterhin musikalisch aktiv. Mit den Klassis...
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (March 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Political party in Manchukuo Concordia Association of Manchukuo 滿洲國協和會 (Japanese, Chinese)Mǎnzhōuguó XiéhehuìManshū-koku KyōwakaiᠮᠠᠨᠵᡠᡤᡠᡵᡠᠨᠰᡳᡝᡥᠣᡥᡠᡳLeaderPuyiFoundedJuly 1932DissolvedAugust ...
D. G. PalekarHakim Mahkamah Agung IndiaMasa jabatan19-07-1971–03-09-1974 Informasi pribadiKebangsaanIndiaProfesiHakimSunting kotak info • L • B D. G. Palekar adalah hakim Mahkamah Agung India. Ia mulai menjabat sebagai hakim di mahkamah tersebut pada 19-07-1971. Masa baktinya sebagai hakim berakhir pada 03-09-1974.[1] Referensi ^ Daftar Hakim di Mahkamah Agung India. Mahkamah Agung India. Diakses tanggal 10 Juni 2021. Artikel bertopik biografi India ini adalah se...
Guinean footballer Naby Diarso (born 1 January 1977 in Conakry) is a Guinean footballer, who currently plays with Satellite FC.[1] International career He represented Guinea at the 2006 Africa Cup of Nations and 2008 games.[2] References ^ Naby Diarso at National-Football-Teams.com ^ African Cup of Nations - CAN 2008 - Afrik-news.com vteGuinea squad – 2006 Africa Cup of Nations 1 Diarso 2 Feindouno 3 I. Camara 4 Kaba 5 Baldé 6 Thiam 7 Mans...
KaliszKalisch Stad in Polen Situering Woiwodschap Groot-Polen District zelfstandig stadsdistrict Coördinaten 51° 46′ NB, 18° 5′ OL Algemeen Oppervlakte 69,77 km² Inwoners (2005) 108.792 (1559 inw./km²) Identificatiecode 30610 Portaal Polen Kalisz ( uitspraak (info / uitleg)) (Duits: Kalisch) is een stad in centraal Polen in de wojwodschap Groot-Polen. De stad telt ongeveer 109.000 inwoners (2005) en is gelegen aan de rivier de Prosna. De stad vormt een ...
Stories with characters from several series DC Comics has produced many crossover stories combining characters from different series of comics. Some of these are set in the fictional DC Universe, or any number of settings within the DC Multiverse. Publication history Pre-Crisis Flash of Two Worlds 1961 Silver Age Flash meets his Golden Age hero, introducing the concept of the DC Multiverse, started almost annual crossover between Earth-One characters and Earth-Two characters.[a] The F...
1969 television film directed by Boris Sagal Night GalleryVideo sleeve.GenreDramaHorrorWritten byRod SerlingDirected by Boris Sagal Steven Spielberg Barry Shear Presented byRod SerlingStarring Joan Crawford Ossie Davis Sam Jaffe Richard Kiley Roddy McDowall Barry Sullivan Music byWilliam GoldenbergCountry of originUnited StatesOriginal languageEnglishProductionProducerWilliam SackheimCinematographyRobert BatchellerWilliam MarguliesEditorEdward AbromsRunning time95 minutesProduction companyUni...
Johann Bernoulli O princípio dos trabalhos virtuais estabelece o equilíbrio de um sistema físico em termos de seus possíveis deslocamentos. Ele é atribuído a Johann Bernoulli (1667-1748). Historicamente, o trabalho virtual e o cálculo de variações associado foram formulados para analisar sistemas de corpos rígidos,[1] mas eles também têm sido desenvolvidos para o estudo dos mecanismos de corpos deformáveis.[2] História A introdução do trabalho virtual e o princípio de m...
Not to be confused with Armenian Youth Association. This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: Armenian Youth Federation – news · newspapers · books · schol...