Tay–Sachs disease

Tay–Sachs disease
Other names	GM2 gangliosidosis, hexosaminidase A deficiency[1]
Cherry-red spot as seen in the retina in Tay–Sachs disease. The fovea's center appears bright red because it is surrounded by a whiter than usual area.
Specialty	Medical genetics
Symptoms	Initially: Decreased ability to turn over, sit, or crawl[1] Later: Seizures, hearing loss, inability to move[1]
Usual onset	Three to six months of age[1]
Duration	Long term[2]
Types	Infantile, juvenile, late-onset[2]
Causes	Genetic (autosomal recessive)[1]
Diagnostic method	Testing blood hexosaminidase A levels, genetic testing[2]
Differential diagnosis	Sandhoff disease, Leigh syndrome, neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses[2]
Treatment	Supportive care, psychosocial support[2]
Prognosis	Death often occurs in early childhood[1]
Frequency	Rare in the general population[1]
Named after	Waren Tay Bernard Sachs

Tay–Sachs disease is a genetic disorder that results in the destruction of nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord.^[1] The most common form is infantile Tay–Sachs disease, which becomes apparent around the age of three to six months of age, with the baby losing the ability to turn over, sit, or crawl.^[1] This is then followed by seizures, hearing loss, and inability to move, with death usually occurring by the age of three to five.^[3][1] Less commonly, the disease may occur later in childhood, adolescence, or adulthood (juvenile or late-onset).^[1] These forms tend to be less severe,^[1] but the juvenile form typically results in death by age 15.^[4]

Tay–Sachs disease is caused by a genetic mutation in the HEXA gene on chromosome 15, which codes a subunit of the hexosaminidase enzyme known as hexosaminidase A.^[1] It is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner.^[1] The mutation disrupts the activity of the enzyme, which results in the build-up of the molecule GM2 ganglioside within cells, leading to toxicity.^[1] Diagnosis may be supported by measuring the blood hexosaminidase A level or genetic testing.^[2] Tay–Sachs disease is a type of GM2 gangliosidosis and sphingolipidosis.^[5]

The treatment of Tay–Sachs disease is supportive in nature.^[2] This may involve multiple specialities as well as psychosocial support for the family.^[2] The disease is rare in the general population.^[1] In Ashkenazi Jews, French Canadians of southeastern Quebec, the Old Order Amish of Pennsylvania, and the Cajuns of southern Louisiana, the condition is more common.^[2][1] Approximately 1 in 3,600 Ashkenazi Jews at birth are affected.^[2]

The disease is named after British ophthalmologist Waren Tay, who in 1881 first described a symptomatic red spot on the retina of the eye; and American neurologist Bernard Sachs, who described in 1887 the cellular changes and noted an increased rate of disease in Ashkenazi Jews.^[6] Carriers of a single Tay–Sachs allele are typically normal.^[2] It has been hypothesized that being a carrier may confer protection from tuberculosis, explaining the persistence of the allele in certain populations.^[7] Researchers are looking at gene therapy or enzyme replacement therapy as possible treatments.^[2]

Signs and symptoms

Tay–Sachs disease is typically first noticed in infants around 6 months old displaying an abnormally strong response to sudden noises or other stimuli, known as the "startle response". There may also be listlessness or muscle stiffness (hypertonia). The disease is classified into several forms, which are differentiated based on the onset age of neurological symptoms.^[8][9]

Infantile

Infants with Tay–Sachs disease appear to develop normally for the first six months after birth. Then, as neurons become distended with GM2 gangliosides, a relentless deterioration of mental and physical abilities begins. The child may become blind, deaf, unable to swallow, atrophied, and paralytic. Death usually occurs before the age of four.^[8]

Juvenile

Juvenile Tay–Sachs disease is rarer than other forms of Tay–Sachs, and usually is initially seen in children between two and ten years old. People with Tay–Sachs disease experience cognitive and motor skill deterioration, dysarthria, dysphagia, ataxia, and spasticity.^[10] Death usually occurs between the ages of five and fifteen years.^[4]

Late-onset

A rare form of this disease, known as Adult-Onset or Late-Onset Tay–Sachs disease, usually has its first symptoms during the 30s or 40s. In contrast to the other forms, late-onset Tay–Sachs disease is usually not fatal as the effects can stop progressing. It is frequently misdiagnosed. It is characterized by unsteadiness of gait and progressive neurological deterioration. Symptoms of late-onset Tay–Sachs – which typically begin to be seen in adolescence or early adulthood – include speech and swallowing difficulties, unsteadiness of gait, spasticity, cognitive decline, and psychiatric illness, particularly a schizophrenia-like psychosis.^[11] Late-onset Tay–Sachs patients may become fully wheelchair-bound.^[12]

Until the 1970s and 1980s, when the disease's molecular genetics became known, the juvenile and adult forms of the disease were not always recognized as variants of Tay–Sachs disease. Post-infantile Tay–Sachs was often misdiagnosed as another neurological disorder, such as Friedreich's ataxia.^[13]

Genetics

Tay–Sachs disease is inherited in an autosomal recessive pattern.

The HEXA gene is located on the long (q) arm of human chromosome 15, between positions 23 and 24.

Tay–Sachs disease is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder, meaning that when both parents are carriers, there is a 25% risk of giving birth to an affected child with each pregnancy. The affected child would have received a mutated copy of the gene from each parent.^[8] If a child received a normal copy from one parent and a mutated copy from the other, it is a carrier.^{[medical citation needed]}

Tay–Sachs results from mutations in the HEXA gene on chromosome 15, which encodes the alpha-subunit of beta-N-acetylhexosaminidase A, a lysosomal enzyme. By 2000, more than 100 different mutations had been identified in the human HEXA gene.^[14] These mutations have included single base insertions and deletions, splice phase mutations, missense mutations, and other more complex patterns. Each of these mutations alters the gene's protein product (i.e., the enzyme), sometimes severely inhibiting its function.^[15] In recent years, population studies and pedigree analysis have shown how such mutations arise and spread within small founder populations.^[16][17] Initial research focused on several such founder populations:

• Ashkenazi Jews. A four base pair insertion in exon 11 (1278insTATC) results in an altered reading frame for the HEXA gene. This mutation is the most prevalent mutation in the Ashkenazi Jewish population, and leads to the infantile form of Tay–Sachs disease.^[18]
• Cajuns. The same 1278insTATC mutation found among Ashkenazi Jews occurs in the Cajun population of southern Louisiana. Researchers have traced the ancestry of carriers from Louisiana families back to a single founder couple – not known to be Jewish – who lived in France in the 18th century.^[19]
• French Canadians. Two mutations, unrelated to the Ashkenazi/Cajun mutation, are absent in France but common among certain French-Canadian communities living in southeastern Quebec and Acadians from the Province of New Brunswick. Pedigree analysis suggests the mutations were uncommon before the late 17th century.^[20][21]

In the 1960s and early 1970s, when the biochemical basis of Tay–Sachs disease was first becoming known, no mutations had been sequenced directly for genetic diseases. Researchers of that era did not yet know how common polymorphisms would prove to be. The "Jewish Fur Trader Hypothesis", with its implication that a single mutation must have spread from one population into another, reflected the knowledge at the time.^[22] Subsequent research, however, has proven that a large variety of different HEXA mutations can cause the disease. Because Tay–Sachs was one of the first genetic disorders for which widespread genetic screening was possible, it is one of the first genetic disorders in which the prevalence of compound heterozygosity has been demonstrated.^[23]

Compound heterozygosity ultimately explains the disease's variability, including the late-onset forms. The disease can potentially result from the inheritance of two unrelated mutations in the HEXA gene, one from each parent. Classic infantile Tay–Sachs disease results when a child has inherited mutations from both parents that completely stop the biodegradation of gangliosides. Late onset forms occur due to the diverse mutation base – people with Tay–Sachs disease may technically be heterozygotes, with two differing HEXA mutations that both inactivate, alter, or inhibit enzyme activity. When a patient has at least one HEXA copy that still enables some level of hexosaminidase A activity, a later onset disease form occurs. When disease occurs because of two unrelated mutations, the patient is said to be a compound heterozygote.^[24]

Heterozygous carriers (individuals who inherit one mutant allele) show abnormal enzyme activity but manifest no disease symptoms. This phenomenon is called dominance; the biochemical reason for wild-type alleles' dominance over nonfunctional mutant alleles in inborn errors of metabolism comes from how enzymes function. Enzymes are protein catalysts for chemical reactions; as catalysts, they speed up reactions without being used up in the process, so only small enzyme quantities are required to carry out a reaction. Someone homozygous for a nonfunctional mutation in the enzyme-encoding gene has little or no enzyme activity, so will manifest the abnormal phenotype (i.e. will develop full-blown disease). A normal:mutated heterozygote (heterozygous individual, also known as a 'carrier') has at least half of the normal enzyme activity level, due to the expression of the wild-type allele. This level is normally enough to enable normal functioning and thus prevent phenotypic expression (i.e. a normal:mutated carrier will not become ill).^[25]

Pathophysiology

Tay–Sachs disease is caused by insufficient activity of the enzyme hexosaminidase A. Hexosaminidase A is a vital hydrolytic enzyme, found in the lysosomes, that breaks down sphingolipids. When hexosaminidase A is no longer functioning properly, the lipids accumulate in the brain and interfere with normal biological processes. Hexosaminidase A specifically breaks down fatty acid derivatives called gangliosides; these are made and biodegraded rapidly in early life as the brain develops. Patients with and carriers of Tay–Sachs can be identified by a simple blood test that measures hexosaminidase A activity.^[8]

The hydrolysis of GM2-ganglioside requires three proteins. Two of them are subunits of hexosaminidase A; the third is a small glycolipid transport protein, the GM2 activator protein (GM2A), which acts as a substrate-specific cofactor for the enzyme. Deficiency in any one of these proteins leads to ganglioside storage, primarily in the lysosomes of neurons. Tay–Sachs disease (along with AB-variant GM2-gangliosidosis and Sandhoff disease) occurs because a mutation inherited from both parents deactivates or inhibits this process. Most Tay–Sachs mutations probably do not directly affect protein functional elements (e.g., the active site). Instead, they cause incorrect folding (disrupting function) or disable intracellular transport.^[26]

Diagnosis

In patients with a clinical suspicion for Tay–Sachs disease, with any age of onset, the initial testing involves an enzyme assay to measure the activity of hexosaminidase in serum, fibroblasts, or leukocytes. Total hexosaminidase enzyme activity is decreased in individuals with Tay–Sachs as is the percentage of hexosaminidase A. After confirmation of decreased enzyme activity in an individual, confirmation by molecular analysis can be pursued.^[27] All patients with infantile onset Tay–Sachs disease have a "cherry red" macula in the retina, easily observable by a physician using an ophthalmoscope.^[8][28] This red spot is a retinal area that appears red because of gangliosides in the surrounding retinal ganglion cells. The choroidal circulation is showing through "red" in this foveal region where all retinal ganglion cells are pushed aside to increase visual acuity. Thus, this cherry-red spot is the only normal part of the retina; it shows up in contrast to the rest of the retina. Microscopic analysis of the retinal neurons shows they are distended from excess ganglioside storage.^[29] Unlike other lysosomal storage diseases (e.g., Gaucher disease, Niemann–Pick disease, and Sandhoff disease), hepatosplenomegaly (liver and spleen enlargement) is not seen in Tay–Sachs.^[30]

Prevention

Main article: Prevention of Tay–Sachs disease

Three main approaches have been used to prevent or reduce the incidence of Tay–Sachs:

• Prenatal diagnosis. If both parents are identified as carriers, prenatal genetic testing can determine whether the fetus has inherited a defective gene copy from both parents.^[31] Chorionic villus sampling (CVS), the most common form of prenatal diagnosis, can be performed between 10 and 14 weeks of gestation. Amniocentesis is usually performed at 15–18 weeks. These procedures have risks of miscarriage of 1% or less.^[32][33]
• Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. By retrieving the mother's eggs for in vitro fertilization, it is possible to test the embryo for the disorder prior to implantation. Healthy embryos are then selected and transferred into the mother's womb, while unhealthy embryos are discarded. In addition to Tay–Sachs disease, preimplantation genetic diagnosis has been used to prevent cystic fibrosis and sickle cell anemia among other genetic disorders.^[34]
• Pre-marriage screening. In Orthodox Jewish circles, the organization Dor Yeshorim carries out an anonymous screening program so that carriers for Tay–Sachs and other genetic disorders can avoid marrying each other.^[35]

Management

As of 2010 there was no treatment that addressed the cause of Tay–Sachs disease or could slow its progression; people receive supportive care to ease the symptoms and extend life by reducing the chance of contracting infections.^[36] Infants are given feeding tubes when they can no longer swallow.^[37] In late-onset Tay–Sachs, medication (e.g., lithium for depression) can sometimes control psychiatric symptoms and seizures, although some medications (e.g., tricyclic antidepressants, phenothiazines, haloperidol, and risperidone) are associated with significant adverse effects.^[24][38]

Outcomes

As of 2010, even with the best care, children with infantile Tay–Sachs disease usually die by the age of 4. Children with the juvenile form are likely to die between the ages 5–15, while the lifespans of those with the adult form will probably not be affected.^[36]

Epidemiology

Founder effects occur when a small number of individuals from a larger population establish a new population. In this illustration, the original population is on the left with three possible founder populations on the right. Two of the three founder populations are genetically distinct from the original population.

Ashkenazi Jews have a high incidence of Tay–Sachs and other lipid storage diseases. In the United States, about 1 in 27 to 1 in 30 Ashkenazi Jews is a recessive carrier. The disease incidence is about 1 in every 3,500 newborn among Ashkenazi Jews.^[39] French Canadians and the Cajun community of Louisiana have an occurrence similar to the Ashkenazi Jews. Irish Americans have a 1 in 50 chance of being a carrier.^[40] In the general population, the incidence of carriers as heterozygotes is about 1 in 300.^[9] The incidence is approximately 1 in 320,000 newborns in the general population in the United States.^[41]

Three general classes of theories have been proposed to explain the high frequency of Tay–Sachs carriers in the Ashkenazi Jewish population:

• Heterozygote advantage.^[42] When applied to a particular allele, this theory posits that mutation carriers have a selective advantage, perhaps in a particular environment.^[43]
• Reproductive compensation. Parents who lose a child because of disease tend to "compensate" by having additional children following the loss. This phenomenon may maintain and possibly even increase the incidence of autosomal recessive disease.^[44]
• Founder effect. This hypothesis states that the high incidence of the 1278insTATC chromosomes^[43] is the result of an elevated allele frequency^[42] that existed by chance in an early founder population.^[43]

Tay–Sachs disease was one of the first genetic disorders for which epidemiology was studied using molecular data. Studies of Tay–Sachs mutations using new molecular techniques such as linkage disequilibrium and coalescence analysis have brought an emerging consensus among researchers supporting the founder effect theory.^[43][45][46]

History

Main article: History of Tay–Sachs disease

Waren Tay and Bernard Sachs were two physicians. They described the disease's progression and provided differential diagnostic criteria to distinguish it from other neurological disorders with similar symptoms.^[6]

Both Tay and Sachs reported their first cases among Ashkenazi Jewish families. Tay reported his observations in 1881 in the first volume of the proceedings of the British Ophthalmological Society, of which he was a founding member.^[47] By 1884, he had seen three cases in a single family. Years later, Bernard Sachs, an American neurologist, reported similar findings when he reported a case of "arrested cerebral development" to other New York Neurological Society members.^[48][49]

Sachs, who recognized that the disease had a familial basis, proposed that the disease should be called amaurotic familial idiocy. However, its genetic basis was still poorly understood. Although Gregor Mendel had published his article on the genetics of peas in 1865, Mendel's paper was largely forgotten for more than a generation – not rediscovered by other scientists until 1899. Thus, the Mendelian model for explaining Tay–Sachs was unavailable to scientists and doctors of the time. The first edition of the Jewish Encyclopedia, published in 12 volumes between 1901 and 1906, described what was then known about the disease:^[50]

It is a curious fact that amaurotic family idiocy, a rare and fatal disease of children, occurs mostly among Jews. The largest number of cases has been observed in the United States—over thirty in number. It was at first thought that this was an exclusively Jewish disease because most of the cases at first reported were between Russian and Polish Jews; but recently there have been reported cases occurring in non-Jewish children. The chief characteristics of the disease are progressive mental and physical enfeeblement; weakness and paralysis of all the extremities; and marasmus, associated with symmetrical changes in the macula lutea. On investigation of the reported cases, they found that neither consanguinity nor syphilitic, alcoholic, or nervous antecedents in the family history are factors in the etiology of the disease. No preventive measures have as yet been discovered, and no treatment has been of benefit, all the cases having terminated fatally.

Jewish immigration to the United States peaked in the period 1880–1924, with the immigrants arriving from Russia and countries in Eastern Europe; this was also a period of nativism (hostility to immigrants) in the United States. Opponents of immigration often questioned whether immigrants from southern and eastern Europe could be assimilated into American society. Reports of Tay–Sachs disease contributed to a perception among nativists that Jews were an inferior race.^[49]

In 1969, Shintaro Okada and John S. O'Brien showed that Tay–Sachs disease was caused by an enzyme defect; they also proved that Tay–Sachs patients could be diagnosed by an assay of hexosaminidase A activity.^[51] The further development of enzyme assays demonstrated that levels of hexosaminidases A and B could be measured in patients and carriers, allowing the reliable detection of heterozygotes. During the early 1970s, researchers developed protocols for newborn testing, carrier screening, and pre-natal diagnosis.^[35][52] By the end of 1979, researchers had identified three variant forms of GM2 gangliosidosis, including Sandhoff disease and the AB variant of GM2-gangliosidosis, accounting for false negatives in carrier testing.^[53]

Society and culture

Main article: Societal and cultural aspects of Tay–Sachs disease

Since carrier testing for Tay–Sachs began in 1971, millions of Ashkenazi Jews have been screened as carriers. Jewish communities embraced the cause of genetic screening from the 1970s on. The success with Tay–Sachs disease has led Israel to become the first country that offers free genetic screening and counseling for all couples and opened discussions about the proper scope of genetic testing for other disorders in Israel.^[54]

Because Tay–Sachs disease was one of the first autosomal recessive genetic disorders for which there was an enzyme assay test (prior to polymerase chain reaction testing methods), it was intensely studied as a model for all such diseases, and researchers sought evidence of a selective process. A continuing controversy is whether heterozygotes (carriers) have or had a selective advantage. The presence of four different lysosomal storage disorders in the Ashkenazi Jewish population suggests a past selective advantage for heterozygous carriers of these conditions."^[45]

This controversy among researchers has reflected various debates among geneticists at large:^[55]

• Dominance versus overdominance. In applied genetics (selective and agricultural breeding), this controversy has reflected the century-long debate over whether dominance or overdominance provides the best explanation for heterosis (hybrid vigor).
• The classical/balance controversy. The classical hypothesis of genetic variability, often associated with Hermann Muller, maintains that most genes are of a normal wild type, and that most individuals are homozygous for that wild type, while most selection is purifying selection that operates to eliminate deleterious alleles. The balancing hypothesis, often associated with Theodosius Dobzhansky, states that heterozygosity will be common at loci, and that it frequently reflects either directional selection or balancing selection.
• Selectionists versus neutralists. In theoretical population genetics, selectionists emphasize the primacy of natural selection as a determinant of evolution and of variation within a population, while neutralists favor a form of Motoo Kimura's neutral theory of molecular evolution, which emphasizes the role of genetic drift.^[56]

Research directions

Enzyme replacement therapy

Enzyme replacement therapy techniques have been investigated for lysosomal storage disorders, and could potentially be used to treat Tay–Sachs as well. The goal would be to replace the nonfunctional enzyme, a process similar to insulin injections for diabetes. However, in previous studies, the HEXA enzyme itself has been thought to be too large to pass through the specialized cell layer in the blood vessels that forms the blood–brain barrier in humans.^{[citation needed]}

Researchers have also tried directly instilling the deficient enzyme hexosaminidase A into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) which bathes the brain. However, intracerebral neurons seem unable to take up this physically large molecule efficiently even when it is directly by them. Therefore, this approach to treatment of Tay–Sachs disease has also been ineffective so far.^[57]

Jacob sheep model

Tay–Sachs disease exists in Jacob sheep.^[58] The biochemical mechanism for this disease in the Jacob sheep is virtually identical to that in humans, wherein diminished activity of hexosaminidase A results in increased concentrations of GM2 ganglioside in the affected animal.^[59] Sequencing of the HEXA gene cDNA of affected Jacobs sheep reveal an identical number of nucleotides and exons as in the human HEXA gene, and 86% nucleotide sequence identity.^[58] A missense mutation (G444R)^[60] was found in the HEXA cDNA of the affected sheep. This mutation is a single nucleotide change at the end of exon 11, resulting in that exon's deletion (before translation) via splicing. The Tay–Sachs model provided by the Jacob sheep is the first to offer promise as a means for gene therapy clinical trials, which may prove useful for disease treatment in humans.^[58]

Substrate reduction therapy

Other experimental methods being researched involve substrate reduction therapy, which attempts to use alternative enzymes to increase the brain's catabolism of GM2 gangliosides to a point where residual degradative activity is sufficient to prevent substrate accumulation.^[61][62] One experiment has demonstrated that using the enzyme sialidase allows the genetic defect to be effectively bypassed, and as a consequence, GM2 gangliosides are metabolized so that their levels become almost inconsequential. If a safe pharmacological treatment can be developed – one that increases expression of lysosomal sialidase in neurons without other toxicity – then this new form of therapy could essentially cure the disease.^[63]

Another metabolic therapy under investigation for Tay–Sachs disease uses miglustat.^[64] This drug is a reversible inhibitor of the enzyme glucosylceramide synthase, which catalyzes the first step in synthesizing glucose-based glycosphingolipids like GM2 ganglioside.^[65]

Increasing β-hexosaminidase A activity

As Tay–Sachs disease is a deficiency of β-hexosaminidase A, deterioration of affected individuals could be slowed or stopped through the use of a substance that increases its activity. However, since in infantile Tay–Sachs disease there is no β-hexosaminidase A, the treatment would be ineffective, but for people affected by Late-Onset Tay–Sachs disease, β-hexosaminidase A is present, so the treatment may be effective. The drug pyrimethamine has been shown to increase activity of β-hexosaminidase A.^[66] However, the increased levels of β-hexosaminidase A still fall far short of the desired "10% of normal HEXA", above which the phenotypic symptoms begin to disappear.^[66]

Cord blood transplant

This is a highly invasive procedure which involves destroying the patient's blood system with chemotherapy and administering cord blood. Of five people who had received the treatment as of 2008, two were still alive after five years and they still had a great deal of health problems.^[67]

Critics point to the procedure's harsh nature—and the fact that it is unapproved. Other significant issues involve the difficulty in crossing the blood–brain barrier, as well as the great expense, as each unit of cord blood costs $25,000, and adult recipients need many units.^[68]

Gene therapy

On 10 February 2022, the first ever gene therapy was announced, it uses an adeno-associated virus (AAV) to deliver the correct instruction for the HEXA gene on brain cells which causes the disease. Only two children were part of a compassionate trial presenting improvements over the natural course of the disease and no vector-related adverse events.^[69][70][71]

References

1. "Tay–Sachs disease". Genetics Home Reference. October 2012. Archived from the original on 13 May 2017. Retrieved 29 May 2017.
2. "Tay Sachs Disease". NORD (National Organization for Rare Disorders). 2017. Archived from the original on 20 February 2017. Retrieved 29 May 2017.
3. "Tay-Sachs disease - Symptoms and causes". Mayo Clinic. Archived from the original on 2020-10-25. Retrieved 2021-04-05.
4. Kurreck, Jens; Stein, Cy Aaron (2016). Molecular Medicine: An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons. p. 71. ISBN 978-3-527-33189-5.
5. Marinetti, G. V. (2012). Disorders of Lipid Metabolism. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 205. ISBN 9781461595649. Archived from the original on 2017-11-05.
6. Walker, Julie (2007). Tay–Sachs Disease. The Rosen Publishing Group. p. 53. ISBN 9781404206977.
7. Vogel, Friedrich; Motulsky, Arno G. (2013). Vogel and Motulsky's Human Genetics: Problems and Approaches (3 ed.). Springer Science & Business Media. p. 578. ISBN 9783662033562. Archived from the original on 2017-11-05.
8. "Tay–Sachs disease Information Page". National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. 14 February 2007. Archived from the original on 27 November 2011. Retrieved 10 May 2007.
9. McKusick, Victor A; Hamosh, Ada. "Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man". United States National Institutes of Health. Archived from the original on 4 January 2016. Retrieved 24 April 2009.
10. Specola N, Vanier MT, Goutières F, Mikol J, Aicardi J (1 January 1990). "The juvenile and chronic forms of GM2 gangliosidosis: clinical and enzymatic heterogeneity". Neurology. 40 (1): 145–150. doi:10.1212/wnl.40.1.145. PMID 2136940. S2CID 19301606.
11. Rosebush PI, MacQueen GM, Clarke JT, Callahan JW, Strasberg PM, Mazurek MF (1995). "Late-onset Tay–Sachs disease presenting as catatonic schizophrenia: Diagnostic and treatment issues". Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 56 (8): 347–53. PMID 7635850.
12. Lyn, Nicole; Pulikottil-Jacob, Ruth; Rochmann, Camille; Krupnick, Robert; Gwaltney, Chad; Stephens, Nick; Kissell, Julie; Cox, Gerald F.; Fischer, Tanya; Hamed, Alaa (2020-04-15). "Patient and caregiver perspectives on burden of disease manifestations in late-onset Tay-Sachs and Sandhoff diseases". Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 15 (1): 92. doi:10.1186/s13023-020-01354-3. ISSN 1750-1172. PMC 7160997. PMID 32295606.
13. Willner JP, Grabowski GA, Gordon RE, Bender AN, Desnick RJ (July 1981). "Chronic GM2 gangliosidosis masquerading as atypical Friedreich's ataxia: Clinical, morphologic, and biochemical studies of nine cases". Neurology. 31 (7): 787–98. doi:10.1212/wnl.31.7.787. PMID 6454083. S2CID 27305940.
14. Kaback MM (December 2000). "Population-based genetic screening for reproductive counseling: the Tay–Sachs disease model". European Journal of Pediatrics. 159 (Suppl 3): S192–S195. doi:10.1007/PL00014401. ISSN 1432-1076. PMID 11216898. S2CID 5808156.
15. Myerowitz R (1997). "Tay–Sachs disease-causing mutations and neutral polymorphisms in the Hex A gene". Human Mutation. 9 (3): 195–208. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1997)9:3<195::AID-HUMU1>3.0.CO;2-7. PMID 9090523. S2CID 22587938.
16. Jarvis, Sarah; Henderson, Roger; Stone, Joanne; Eddleman, Keith; Duenwald, Mary (2011-09-23). Pregnancy For Dummies. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-119-97731-5.
17. Chong, Jessica X.; Ouwenga, Rebecca; Anderson, Rebecca L.; Waggoner, Darrel J.; Ober, Carole (2012-10-05). "A Population-Based Study of Autosomal-Recessive Disease-Causing Mutations in a Founder Population". American Journal of Human Genetics. 91 (4): 608–620. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.08.007. ISSN 0002-9297. PMC 3484657. PMID 22981120.
18. Myerowitz R, Costigan FC (15 December 1988). "The major defect in Ashkenazi Jews with Tay–Sachs disease is an insertion in the gene for the alpha-chain of beta-hexosaminidase". Journal of Biological Chemistry. 263 (35): 18587–18589. doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(18)37323-X. PMID 2848800. Archived from the original on 17 April 2014.
19. McDowell GA, Mules EH, Fabacher P, Shapira E, Blitzer MG (1992). "The presence of two different infantile Tay–Sachs disease mutations in a Cajun population". American Journal of Human Genetics. 51 (5): 1071–1077. PMC 1682822. PMID 1307230.
20. Keats BJ, Elston RC, Andermann E (1987). "Pedigree discriminant analysis of two French Canadian Tay–Sachs families". Genetic Epidemiology. 4 (2): 77–85. doi:10.1002/gepi.1370040203. PMID 2953646. S2CID 23770703.
21. De Braekeleer M, Hechtman P, Andermann E, Kaplan F (April 1992). "The French Canadian Tay–Sachs disease deletion mutation: Identification of probable founders". Human Genetics. 89 (1): 83–87. doi:10.1007/BF00207048. PMID 1577470. S2CID 19278804.
22. Fraikor, Arlene L. (1977). "Tay-Sachs disease: genetic drift among the Ashkenazim Jews". Social Biology. 24 (2): 117–34. doi:10.1080/19485565.1977.9988272. PMID 897699.
23. Ohno K, Suzuki K (5 December 1988). "Multiple Abnormal beta-Hexosaminidase Alpha-Chain mRNAs in a Compound-Heterozygous Ashkenazi Jewish Patient with Tay–Sachs Disease" (PDF). Journal of Biological Chemistry. 263 (34): 18563–7. doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(19)81396-0. PMID 2973464. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 September 2007. Retrieved 11 May 2007.
24. Kaback MM, Desnick RJ (2011). "Hexosaminidase A Deficiency". In Pagon RA, Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Bird TD, Dolan CR, Fong CT, Smith RJ, Stephens K (eds.). GeneReviews [Internet]. Seattle, Washington, USA: University of Washington, Seattle. PMID 20301397. Archived from the original on 2014-01-16.
25. Korf, Bruce R (2000). Human genetics: A problem-based approach (2 ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 11–12. ISBN 978-0-632-04425-2.
26. Mahuran DJ (1999). "Biochemical consequences of mutations causing the GM2 gangliosidoses". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease. 1455 (2–3): 105–138. doi:10.1016/S0925-4439(99)00074-5. PMID 10571007.
27. Hechtman P, Kaplan F (1993). "Tay–Sachs disease screening and diagnosis: Evolving technologies". DNA and Cell Biology. 12 (8): 651–665. doi:10.1089/dna.1993.12.651. PMID 8397824.
28. Tittarelli R, Giagheddu M, Spadetta V (July 1966). "Typical ophthalmoscopic picture of "cherry-red spot" in an adult with the myoclonic syndrome". The British Journal of Ophthalmology. 50 (7): 414–420. doi:10.1136/bjo.50.7.414. PMC 506244. PMID 5947589.
29. Aragão RE, Ramos RM, Pereira FB, Bezerra AF, Fernandes DN (Jul–Aug 2009). "'Cherry red spot' in a patient with Tay–Sachs disease: case report". Arq Bras Oftalmol. 72 (4): 537–9. doi:10.1590/S0004-27492009000400019. PMID 19820796.
30. Seshadri R, Christopher R, Arvinda HR (2011). "Teaching NeuroImages: MRI in infantile Sandhoff disease". Neurology. 77 (5): e34. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318227b215. PMID 21810694.
31. Stoller D (1997). "Prenatal Genetic Screening: The Enigma of Selective Abortion". Journal of Law and Health. 12 (1): 121–140. PMID 10182027.
32. "Chorionic Villus Sampling and Amniocentesis: Recommendations for Prenatal Counseling". United States, Center for Disease Control. Archived from the original on 14 July 2009. Retrieved 18 June 2009.
33. Bodurtha J, Strauss JF (2012). "Genomics and perinatal care". N. Engl. J. Med. 366 (1): 64–73. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1105043. PMC 4877696. PMID 22216843.
34. Marik, J J (13 April 2005). "Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis". eMedicine.com. Archived from the original on 31 January 2009. Retrieved 10 May 2007.
35. Ekstein, J; Katzenstein, H (2001). "The Dor Yeshorim story: Community-based carrier screening for Tay–Sachs disease". Tay–Sachs Disease. Advances in Genetics. Vol. 44. pp. 297–310. doi:10.1016/S0065-2660(01)44087-9. ISBN 978-0-12-017644-1. PMID 11596991.
36. Colaianni A, Chandrasekharan S, Cook-Deegan R (2010). "Impact of Gene Patents and Licensing Practices on Access to Genetic Testing and Carrier Screening for Tay–Sachs and Canavan Disease". Genetics in Medicine. 12 (4 Suppl): S5–S14. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181d5a669. PMC 3042321. PMID 20393311.
37. Eeg-Olofsson L, Kristensson K, Sourander P, Svennerholm L (1966). "Tay–Sachs disease. A generalized metabolic disorder". Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica. 55 (6): 546–62. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.1966.tb15254.x. PMID 5972561. S2CID 86246245.
38. Shapiro BE, Hatters-Friedman S, Fernandes-Filho JA, Anthony K, Natowicz MR (12 September 2006). "Late-onset Tay–Sachs disease: Adverse effects of medications and implications for treatment". Neurology. 67 (5): 875–877. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000233847.72349.b6. PMID 16966555. S2CID 37096876.
39. Rozenberg R, Pereira Lda V (2001). "The frequency of Tay–Sachs disease causing mutations in the Brazilian Jewish population justifies a carrier screening program". Sao Paulo Medical Journal. 119 (4): 146–149. doi:10.1590/s1516-31802001000400007. PMID 11500789.
40. "1,000 New York Irish to get tested for Tay Sachs disease gene". Irish Central. 13 August 2014. Archived from the original on 13 February 2020. Retrieved 13 February 2020.
41. GM2 Gangliosidoses – Introduction And Epidemiology Archived 2012-04-20 at the Wayback Machine at Medscape. Author: David H Tegay. Updated: Mar 9, 2012
42. Chakravarti A, Chakraborty R (1978). "Elevated frequency of Tay–Sachs disease among Ashkenazic Jews unlikely by genetic drift alone". American Journal of Human Genetics. 30 (3): 256–261. PMC 1685578. PMID 677122.
43. Frisch A, Colombo R, Michaelovsky E, Karpati M, Goldman B, Peleg L (March 2004). "Origin and spread of the 1278insTATC mutation causing Tay–Sachs disease in Ashkenazi Jews: Genetic drift as a robust and parsimonious hypothesis". Human Genetics. 114 (4): 366–376. doi:10.1007/s00439-003-1072-8. PMID 14727180. S2CID 10768286.
44. Koeslag JH, Schach SR (1984). "Tay–Sachs disease and the role of reproductive compensation in the maintenance of ethnic variations in the incidence of autosomal recessive disease". Annals of Human Genetics. 48 (3): 275–281. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1984.tb01025.x. PMID 6465844. S2CID 23470984.
45. Risch N, Tang H, Katzenstein H, Ekstein J (2003). "Geographic Distribution of Disease Mutations in the Ashkenazi Jewish Population Supports Genetic Drift over Selection". American Journal of Human Genetics. 72 (4): 812–822. doi:10.1086/373882. PMC 1180346. PMID 12612865.
46. Slatkin M (2004). "A Population-Genetic Test of Founder Effects and Implications for Ashkenazi Jewish Diseases". American Journal of Human Genetics. 75 (2): 282–293. doi:10.1086/423146. PMC 1216062. PMID 15208782.
47. Tay, Waren (1881). "Symmetrical changes in the region of the yellow spot in each eye of an infant". Transactions of the Ophthalmological Society. 1: 55–57.
48. Sachs, Bernard (1887). "On arrested cerebral development with special reference to cortical pathology". Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 14 (9): 541–554. doi:10.1097/00005053-188714090-00001. hdl:10192/32703.
49. Reuter, Shelley Z (Summer 2006). "The Genuine Jewish Type: Racial Ideology and Anti-Immigrationism in Early Medical Writing about Tay–Sachs Disease". The Canadian Journal of Sociology. 31 (3): 291–323. doi:10.1353/cjs.2006.0061. S2CID 143784985.
50. "Amaurotic Idiocy". The Jewish Encyclopedia. New York: Funk and Wagnalls. 1901–1906. Archived from the original on 3 March 2012. Retrieved 7 March 2009.
51. Okada S, O'Brien JS (1969). "Tay–Sachs disease: Generalized absence of a beta-D-N-acetylhexosaminidase component". Science. 165 (3894): 698–700. Bibcode:1969Sci...165..698O. doi:10.1126/science.165.3894.698. PMID 5793973. S2CID 8473726.
52. O'Brien JS, Okada S, Chen A, Fillerup DL (1970). "Tay–Sachs disease: Detection of heterozygotes and homozygotes by serum hexaminidase assay". New England Journal of Medicine. 283 (1): 15–20. doi:10.1056/NEJM197007022830104. PMID 4986776.
53. O'Brien, John S (1983). "The Gangliosidoses". In Stanbury, J B; et al. (eds.). The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease. New York: McGraw Hill. pp. 945–969.
54. Sagi M (1998). "Ethical aspects of genetic screening in Israel". Science in Context. 11 (3–4): 419–429. doi:10.1017/s0269889700003112. PMID 15168671. S2CID 31003675.
55. Tay-Sachs Disease. Elsevier. 2001-10-10. ISBN 978-0-08-049030-4.
56. Kimura, Motoo (1983). The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-23109-1.
57. Matsuoka K, Tamura T, Tsuji D, Dohzono Y, Kitakaze K, Ohno K, Saito S, Sakuraba H, Itoh K (14 October 2011). "Therapeutic Potential of Intracerebroventricular Replacement of Modified Human β-Hexosaminidase B for GM2 Gangliosidosis". Molecular Therapy. 19 (6): 1017–1024. doi:10.1038/mt.2011.27. PMC 3129794. PMID 21487393.
58. Torres PA, Zeng BJ, Porter BF, Alroy J, Horak F, Horak J, Kolodny EH (2010). "Tay–Sachs disease in Jacob sheep". Molecular Genetics and Metabolism. 101 (4): 357–363. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2010.08.006. ISSN 1096-7192. PMID 20817517.
59. Porter BF, Lewis BC, Edwards JF, Alroy J, Zeng BJ, Torres PA, Bretzlaff KN, Kolodny EH (2011). "Pathology of GM2 Gangliosidosis in Jacob Sheep". Veterinary Pathology. 48 (3): 807–813. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.819.2731. doi:10.1177/0300985810388522. ISSN 0300-9858. PMID 21123862. S2CID 6106101.
60. Kolodny E, Horak F, Horak J (2011). "Jacob sheep breeders find more Tay–Sachs carriers". ALBC Newsletter. Archived from the original on 20 March 2012. Retrieved 5 May 2011.
61. Platt FM, Neises GR, Reinkensmeier G, Townsend MJ, Perry VH, Proia RL, Winchester B, Dwek RA, Butters TD (1997). "Prevention of lysosomal storage in Tay–Sachs mice treated with N-butyldeoxynojirimycin". Science. 276 (5311): 428–431. doi:10.1126/science.276.5311.428. PMID 9103204.
62. Lachmann RH, Platt FM (2001). "Substrate reduction therapy for glycosphingolipid storage disorders". Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs. 10 (3): 455–466. doi:10.1517/13543784.10.3.455. PMID 11227045. S2CID 5625586.
63. Igdoura SA, Mertineit C, Trasler JM, Gravel RA (1999). "Sialidase-mediated depletion of GM2 ganglioside in Tay–Sachs neuroglia cells". Human Molecular Genetics. 8 (6): 1111–1116. doi:10.1093/hmg/8.6.1111. PMID 10332044.
64. "Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Zavesca (Miglustat) in Patients With Infantile Onset Gangliosidosis: Single and Steady State Oral Doses". 5 May 2008. Archived from the original on 13 February 2012. Retrieved 10 April 2012.
65. Kolodny EH, Neudorfer O, Gianutsos J, Zaroff C, Barnett N, Zeng BJ, Raghavan S, Torres P, Pastores GM (2004). "Late-onset Tay–Sachs disease: Natural history and treatment with OGT 918 (Zavesca™)". Journal of Neurochemistry. 90 (S1): 54–55. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02650_.x. ISSN 0022-3042. S2CID 221872176.
66. Osher E, Fattal-Valevski A, Sagie L, Urshanski N, Amir-Levi Y, Katzburg S, Peleg L, Lerman-Sagie T, Zimran A, Elstein D, Navon R, Stern N, Valevski A (March 2011). "Pyrimethamine increases β-hexosaminidase A activity in patients with Late Onset Tay Sachs". Mol. Genet. Metab. 102 (3): 356–63. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2010.11.163. PMID 21185210.
67. Prasad, Vinod K.; Mendizabal, Adam; Parikh, Suhag H.; Szabolcs, Paul; Driscoll, Timothy A.; Page, Kristin; Lakshminarayanan, Sonali; Allison, June; Wood, Susan (2008-10-01). "Unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplantation for inherited metabolic disorders in 159 pediatric patients from a single center: influence of cellular composition of the graft on transplantation outcomes". Blood. 112 (7): 2979–2989. doi:10.1182/blood-2008-03-140830. ISSN 0006-4971. PMC 2556628. PMID 18587012.
68. William Hathaway (May 16, 2006). "Umbilical Cord Blood Is Child's Last Hope, Stem Cells Could Halt Tay–Sachs Damage". Hartford Courant. Archived from the original on 2018-07-05. Retrieved 2018-05-20.
69. Flotte, Terence R.; Cataltepe, Oguz; Puri, Ajit; Batista, Ana Rita; Moser, Richard; McKenna-Yasek, Diane; Douthwright, Catherine; Gernoux, Gwladys; Blackwood, Meghan; Mueller, Christian; Tai, Phillip W. L. (10 February 2022). "AAV gene therapy for Tay-Sachs disease". Nature Medicine. 28 (2): 251–259. doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01664-4. ISSN 1078-8956. PMC 10786171. PMID 35145305. S2CID 246748772.
70. Sena-Esteves, Miguel (14 February 2022). "First gene therapy for Tay-Sachs disease successfully given to two children". The Conversation. Archived from the original on 2022-03-06. Retrieved 2022-03-07.
71. "Parents spark breakthrough gene therapy for children with Tay-Sachs disease". The Independent. 2022-02-18. Archived from the original on 2022-03-07. Retrieved 2022-03-07.

External links

• GeneReviews/NCBI/NIH/UW entry on hexosaminidase A deficiency, Tay–Sachs disease
• NINDS Tay–Sachs Disease Information Page
• Tay–Sachs disease at NLM Genetics Home Reference
• Tay–Sachs on NCBI