Parties of power are typically described[by whom?] as having a hierarchical top-down structure, being centralised, organised in clientelistic networks, lacking a defined or coherent ideology and playing a subordinate role towards the bureaucracy.[5] They have been created by the state as a method to assist in the political interests of the executive branch but while also being reliant on the state to manipulate election outcomes.[6]
The use of the concept and of the term "party of power" has been criticized, including by those who claim that, strictly speaking, United Russia and Amanat do not possess or exercise power themselves. It is not the parties that make decisions and policies in the last resort. The term "parties of power" may therefore be regarded as misleading.[2][need quotation to verify]
In the Russian language, the term "party of power" is used to describe the party which advocates the current head of state, the party which belongs to/is controlled by the current government or the party established by the current highest official in the state. The terms "ruling party" and "party of power" can be considered as antonyms, because a party of power will be established after a presidential election to support the winner and not the reverse. The party has the same ideology as the president or prime minister. A party which supports the current president without difficulty wins parliamentary elections. After the party leader loses a presidential election, a party of power without coherent ideology, as a rule, ceases to exist.[citation needed]
List of Russian parties of power
These parties were specially established for support of the incumbent president or prime minister in the Russian parliament:
^
Compare:
Isaacs, Rico (21 March 2011). Party System Formation in Kazakhstan: Between Formal and Informal Politics. Central Asian Studies. Abingdon: Routledge (published 2011). ISBN9781136791079. Retrieved 2018-03-07. A central principle behind the party of power is a party's relationship with the state (Knox et al., 2006). Parties of power have a close relationship with the executive branch which is seen to co-opt parties of power for their own political purposes (Hale, 2004). Thus, parties of power are an extension of the executive where the party 'is the actual group whose members wield power in and through the executive branch of government' (Oversloot and Verheul, 2006: 394).
^ abcdIsaacs, Rico (2011). Party System Formation in Kazakhstan: Between Formal and Informal Politics. Routledge. p. 38.
^Herron (2009). Elections and Democracy After Communism?. p. 87.
^Baader, Max (2013). Party politics in Georgia and Ukraine and the failure of Western assistance. Routledge. p. 26. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
^Nicklaus Laverty (2015) The “party of power” as a type, East European Politics, 31:1, 71-87, DOI: 10.1080/21599165.2014.983088
Literature
Del Sordi, Adele (2011), Parties of power as authoritarian institutions: The cases of Russia and Kazakhstan, Spanish Political Science Association (AECPA)
Gel′man, Vladimir (2013). Party Politics in Russia: From Competition to Hierarchy. Routledge. pp. 35–52. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
Herron, Erik S. (2009). Elections and Democracy After Communism?. Palgrave Macmillan.
Oversloot, Hans; Verheul, Ruben (2013), "Managing Democracy: Political Parties and the State in Russia", Political Parties and the State in Post-Communist Europe, Routledge
Remington, Thomas (2013). Patronage and the Party of Power: President-Parliament Relations under Vladimir Putin. Routledge. pp. 81–110. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)