Oligokyphus was named by Edwin Hennig in 1922 on the basis of two teeth from Württemberg, Germany. The name of the genus is derived from Greek ὀλιγος "few" and κυφος "hump", and is a calque of Paucituberculata, the group in which Oligokyphus was initially classified, from Latin into Greek.[1] Like Tritylodon, Oligokyphus was originally classified as a mammal. Hennig initially recognized two species, which he named Oligokyphus triserialis and Oligokyphus biserialis based on the number of rows of cusps, though he acknowledged this distinction as provisional.[2]
The next discoveries of Oligokyphus were made in the United Kingdom. The German paleontologist Walter Georg Kühne traveled to the United Kingdom in 1938 with the goal of collecting early mammal specimens. The outbreak of World War II led to Kühne's internment on the Isle of Man, during which time he prepared and studied the collected material.[3] Kühne initially identified the specimens as Tritylodon. His discovery that the specimens lacked the dentary-squamosal jaw joint, at the time viewed as the defining characteristic of mammals, led him to conclude that tritylodontids were "mammal-like reptiles", though he recognized that they were close to the origin of mammals.[4] Kühne's detailed description of the material was published in 1956, and made Oligokyphus the best-known tritylodontid. Kühne regarded two different size classes of adult as being present. Though he acknowledged the differences could be due to sexual dimorphism, he proposed that they represented two distinct species, which he named Oligokyphus major and Oligokyphus minor.[5] In 1985, the genus was reported from the Early Jurassic Kayenta Formation in the United States.[6] In 1994, the species O. lufengensis was described from the Lower Jurassic Lufeng Formation of China.[7] In 2015, indeterminate remains of the genus were described from the McCoy Brook Formation of eastern Canada, dating to the latest Triassic (Rhaetian).[8]
Description
Oligokyphus were relatively small tritylodontids, with a skull up to 90 mm long and an estimated body mass of 3.4 kg.[9] There may have been some sexual dimorphism in size.[10]
Skull and jaw
The teeth of the upper and lower jaw contain bump rows that fit together perfectly in order to maintain an accurate bite. Oligokyphus had a face similar to that of modern mammals, although there were differences in the cheekbones and eye sockets. It had a bony secondary palate and double-rooted cheek teeth. Unlike mammals, the teeth of Oligokyphus did not occlude. The jaw was double jointed, and the neck was flexible, with an atlas and axis and a double occipital condyle.
The teeth were different from those of related cynodonts; there were no canine teeth, and unusually large, rodent-like incisors. There is a large gap, or diastema, separating the cheek teeth from the incisors. The lower jaw of these animals moved back and forth when the mouth was shut so that the food could be chopped up. Oligokyphus had no premaxilla, but did have a lateral extension of the maxilla.
While the postcanines in non-mammalians, such as Oligokyphus, are difficult to differentiate from canines, the lower postcanines of Oligokyphus (also considered to be pre-molars) are defining from other Tritylodonts. On lower postcanine teeth of Trityldonts, two cusps can be found per row; however, Oligokyphus have two rows with three cusps in each row.[11] These cusps, specific to Oligokyphus Tritylodonts, allowed for a well-fitting bite that was particularly good at shredding plant material dense in fiber. The foremost incisors are similar to those of today's rodents, extremely intensified and enlarged. The typical location of canine teeth is left empty with Oligokyphus. Instead, a gap is inserted in this area of the jaw as Oligokyphus lack the teeth commonly known as canines.[12]
Cladistics/phylogeny
Oligokyphus is in the family Tritylodontidae. The family is named after the shape of their teeth. Tritylodontidae means "three knob teeth". The members of this family were all small to medium-sized advanced synapsids with combined specialized structures for herbivorous eating. The first Tritylodont was found in South Africa in upper Jurassic rocks. It was first thought to be one of the earliest mammals. This classification has since been adjusted. These non-mammals became progressively more mammal-like. They are now classified as the closest relatives to the mammals and this is supported by their high, flat, crested jaw, large zygomatic arches, well developed secondary palate, and specialized dentition.
There have also been comparisons between the cranial nerves of Tritylodonts and mammals. The shoulder girdle and forelimb structures were suggestive of digging animals. These animals were extremely active and burrowed in leaf litter and dirt, which suggests characteristics of rodents and rabbits. They naturally had a metabolism that was partially or completely endothermic. They were thought to be driven out by relatives such as mammals competing for the same ecological niches.[citation needed] Another reason that this animal could have gone extinct was due to new plant development. Some flowering plants, or angiosperms, could have been detrimental to these animals since they may not have been used to eating new plants.[citation needed]
Paleoecology
Habitat
Oligokyphus were small tetrapod, terrestrial animals. They have long been considered as mammaliomorphs, a link between earlier synapsids and modern mammals. It is believed these animals were primarily land dwelling, living amongst small shrubs or bushes. It is also thought that Oligokyphus fed on seeds or nuts, as their teeth resemble those of modern animals that also feed on seeds and nuts.[12] It is rather difficult to estimate the social behaviors of Oligokyphus as most of it does not preserve in the fossil record. However, considering the conditions on the planet during the times that Oligokyphus was alive and thriving (late Triassic and early Jurassic) and also the locations of which fossils of these animals were found, some educated predictions can be made about their metabolism and feeding habits. Oligokyphus, with its conveniently placed leg and hip structures, likely was quick-moving and fed off of low-lying plant life. With its long weasel-like body, it may have even been possible for Oligokyphus to reach higher vegetation simply by standing on its hind legs. It probably had good use of its hands to manipulate seeds and other digestively pleasing foods. There has not been any support showing Oligokyphus had the ability to climb vertically, as some rodents are capable of doing today.
A definitive radiometric dating of the area preserved in the formation where Oligokyphus lived has not yet been made, and the available stratigraphic correlation has been based on a combination of radiometric dates from vertebrate fossils, magnetostratigraphy and pollen evidence.[13] It has been surmised that the Kayenta Formation was deposited during the Sinemurian and Pliensbachian stages of the Early Jurassic Period or approximately 199 to 182 million years ago.[14] This formation is part of the Glen Canyon Group that includes formations not only in northern Arizona but also parts of southeastern Utah, western Colorado, and northwestern New Mexico. The formation was primarily deposited by rivers. During the Early Jurassic period, the land that is now the Kayenta Formation experienced rainy summers and dry winters. By the Middle Jurassic period it was being encroached upon from the north by a sandy dune field that would become the Navajo Sandstone.[15] The animals here were adapted to a seasonal climate and abundant water could be found in streams, ponds and lakes.
^ abSovak, J. 1999. Before the Dinosaurs (Coloring Book). Dover Publications. p.43 ISBN0-486-40568-0
^J. M. Clark and D. E. Fastovsky. 1986. Vertebrate biostratigraphy of the Glen Canyon Group in northern Arizona. The Beginning of the Age of the Dinosaurs: Faunal change across the Triassic-Jurassic boundary, N. C. Fraser and H.-D. Sues (eds.), Cambridge University Press 285–301
^Padian, K (1997) Glen Canyon Group In: Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs, edited by Currie, P. J., and Padian, K., Academic Press.
^Gay, R. 2010. Kayentavenator elysiae, a new tetanuran from the early Jurassic of Arizona. Pages 27–43 in Gay, R. Notes on early Mesozoic theropods. Lulu Press (on-demand online press).
^Tykoski, R. S., 1998, The Osteology of Syntarsus kayentakatae and its Implications for Ceratosaurid Phylogeny: Theses, The University of Texas, December 1998.
^ abLucas, S. G.; Heckert, A. B.; Tanner, L. H. (2005). "Arizona's Jurassic fossil vertebrates and the age of the Glen Canyon Group". In Heckert, A. B.; Lucas, S. G. (eds.). Vertebrate paleontology in Arizona. Bulletin. Vol. 29. Albuquerque, NM: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science. pp. 95–104.
^ abJenkins, F. A. Jr.; Shubin, N. H. (1998). "Prosalirus bitis and the anuran caudopelvic mechanism". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 18 (3): 495–510. doi:10.1080/02724634.1998.10011077.
^Curtis, K.; Padian, K. (1999). "An Early Jurassic microvertebrate fauna from the Kayenta Formation of northeastern Arizona: microfaunal change across the Triassic-Jurassic boundary". PaleoBios. 19 (2): 19–37.
^ abLuttrell, P. R., and Morales, M. 1993. Bridging the gap across Moenkopi Wash: a lithostratigraphic correlation. Aspects of Mesozoic geology and paleontology of the Colorado Plateau. Pages 111–127 in Morales, M., editor. Museum of Northern Arizona, Flagstaff, AZ. Bulletin 59.
^Hamblin, A. H., and Foster, J. R. 2000. Ancient animal footprints and traces in the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, south-central Utah. Pages 557–568 in Sprinkel, D. A., Chidsey, T. C. Jr., and Anderson, P. B. editors. Geology of Utah's parks and monuments. Utah Geological Association, Salt Lake City, UT. Publication 28.
^Lucas, S. G.; Tanner, L. H. (2007). "Tetrapod biostratigraphy and biochronology of the Triassic-Jurassic transition on the southern Colorado Plateau, USA". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 244 (1–4): 242–256. Bibcode:2007PPP...244..242L. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.06.030.
Johnson R. Haas. "the late Paleozoic land faunas"(PDF). GEOS 2000 Evolution of Life. Western Michigan University. Archived from the original(PDF) on 18 February 2012. Retrieved 8 June 2012.
Hennig, Edwin (1922-07-18). "Die Säugerzähne des württembergischen Rhät–Lias-Bonebeds" [The mammal teeth of the Rhaeto-Liassic bonebeds of Württemberg]. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie. Beilage-Band 46 (2): 181–267.
Kühne, W. G. (1943-09-01). "The dentary of Tritylodon and the systematic position of the Tritylodontidae". Annals and Magazine of Natural History. 10 (69): 589–601. doi:10.1080/03745481.1943.9728046. ISSN0374-5481.
Savage, Robert J. G. (1993). "Vertebrate fissure faunas with special reference to Bristol Channel Mesozoic faunas". Journal of the Geological Society. 150 (6): 1025–1034. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.150.6.1025. ISSN0016-7649. S2CID131591906.
Hans-Dieter Sues (1986). "Dinnebitodon Amarall, a New Tritylodontid (Synapsida) from the lower Jurassic of Western North America". Journal of Paleontology. 60 (1986): 758–762. doi:10.1017/S0022336000022277. JSTOR1305061. S2CID131801988.
M. Alan Kazlev. "Tritylodontidae-Oligokyphus". Kheper – transformation – evolution – metamorphosis. Retrieved 8 June 2012.
Michael R. Long. "Oligokyphus". Picture library. Natural History Museum (London). 001460. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 8 June 2012.