In 2001 Hopson, joined by James W. Kitching, formally described the specimen as the new taxon Lumkuia fuzzi. The generic name comes from the Lumku Mission, near which the holotype was found. The specific name honours the South African palaeontologist Alfred W. "Fuzz" Crompton. Hopson and Kitching gave the skull a detailed description, but the postcranial elements were described only in superficial terms. In 2022 the specimen, including the postcranium, was given a more comprehensive redescription by Julien Benoit and colleagues, based on data gained from synchrotronX-ray computed tomography.[2]
Description
The postcanines are similar to those of the later chiniquodontids, but the secondary palate is quite short in comparison, and the genus lacks the angulation of the ventral cranial margin seen in chiniquodontids.[2]Lumkuia can be seen as more derived than other contemporary cynodonts such as Cynognathus with the crowns of its teeth high and narrow and having inwardly curving tops.
Lumkuia was first described in 2001 by the palaeontologists Hopson and Kitching, who considered it to be the most basal member of Probainognathia;[2] this placement has been supported by several later studies.[3][4][5] A 2010 phylogenetic analysis by Liu and Olsen, and multiple later analyses based on the same data matrix, have instead placed it outside the clade formed by Cynognathia and Probainognathia.[3] However, during a 2022 redescription of Lumkuia, new anatomical characters found during the study were incorporated into the Liu & Olsen (2010) matrix, which led to Lumkuia being unambiguously recovered as a basal probainognathian.[3] Before the discovery of Lumkuia, the earliest known probainognathians were from younger strata in Africa and South America that were deposited in the late Middle and Late Triassic.[6][7][8][9][10][11][12]
References
^Fernando Abdala, P. John Hancox and Johann Neveling (2005). Cynodonts from the Uppermost Burgersdorp Formation, South Africa, and Their Bearing on the Biostratigraphy and Correlation of the Triassic Cynognathus Assemblage Zone. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology25(1):192-199.
^ abcdeHopson, J. A. and Kitching, J. W. (2001). A probainognathian cynodont from South Africa and the phylogeny of non-mammalian cynodonts. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology156(1):5-35
^ abcBenoit, J.; Nxumalo, M.; Norton, L. A.; Fernandez, V.; Gaetano, L. C.; Rubidge, B.; Abdala, F. (2022). "Synchrotron scanning sheds new light on Lumkuia fuzzi (Therapsida, Cynodontia) from the Middle Triassic of South Africa and its phylogenetic placement". Journal of African Earth Sciences: 104689. doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2022.104689.
^Romer, A. S. (1969). The Chañares (Argentina) Triassic reptile fauna V. A new chiniquodontid cynodont, Probelesodon lewisi- cynodont ancestry. Breviora333:1–24.
^Romer, A. S. (1970). The Chañares (Argentina) Triassic reptile fauna VI. A chiniquodontid cynodont with an incipient squamosaldentary jaw articulation. Breviora344:1–18
^Martínez, R. N. and Forster, C. A. (1996). The skull of Probelesodon sanjuanensis, Sp. Nov., from the Late Triassic Ischigualasto Formation of Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology16:285–91.
^Martínez, R. N., May, C. L. and Forster, C. A. (1996). A new carnivorous cynodont from the Ischigualasto Formation (Late Triassic, Argentina), with comments on eucynodont phylogeny. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology16:271–84.
^Romer, A. S. (1969). The Brazilian Triassic cynodont reptiles Belesodon and Chiniquodon. Breviora332:1–16
^Hopson, J. A. (1995). Patterns of evolution in the manus and pes of non-mammalian therapsids. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology15:615–39.
^Rubidge, B. S. and Sidor, C. A. (2001). Evolutionary patterns among Permo-Triassic theraspids. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics32:449-480.