Arend Lijphart offers what is perhaps the dominant definition of majoritarian democracy. He identifies that majoritarian democracy is based on the Westminster model, and majority rule.[5] According to Lijphart, the key features of a majoritarian democracy are:
Concentration of executive power. This means that the Cabinet or executive is composed entirely of members from a single party who holds the majority of seats in the legislature.
One-dimensional party system, where the two dominant parties largely fall on a spectrum along a single dimension e.g. representing the left and right from a socio-economic perspective.
In the majoritarian vision of democracy, voters mandate elected politicians to enact the policies they proposed during their electoral campaign.[6]Elections are the focal point of political engagement, with limited ability for the people to influence policymaking between elections.[7]
Criticisms
Though common, majoritarian democracy is not universally accepted – majoritarian democracy is criticized as having the inherent danger of becoming a "tyranny of the majority" whereby the majority in society could oppress or exclude minority groups,[1] which can lead to violence and civil war.[2][3] Some argue[who?] that since parliament, statutes and preparatory works are very important in majoritarian democracies,[citation needed] and considering the absence of a tradition to exercise judicial review at the national level,[citation needed] majoritarian democracies are undemocratic.[citation needed]
Fascism rejects majoritarian democracy because the latter assumes equality of citizens and fascists claim that fascism is a form of authoritarian democracy that represents the views of a dynamic organized minority of a nation rather than the disorganized majority.[8]
Examples
There are few, if any, purely majoritarian democracies. In many democracies, majoritarianism is modified or limited by one or several mechanisms which attempt to represent minorities.
The United Kingdom is the classical example of a majoritarian system.[5] The United Kingdom's Westminster system has been borrowed and adapted in many other democracies. Majoritarian features of the United Kingdom's political system include:
A single party typically forms a majority in Parliament, and thus forms executive government
However, even in the United Kingdom, majoritarianism has been at least somewhat limited by the introduction of devolved parliaments.[10]
Australia is a generally majoritarian democracy, although some have argued that it typifies a form of 'modified majoritarianism'.[9] This is because while the lower house of the Australian Parliament is elected via preferential voting, the upper house is elected via proportional representation. Proportional representation is a voting system that allows for greater minority representation.[11] Canada is subject to a similar debate.[12]
The United States has some elements of majoritarianism - such as first-past-the-post voting in many contexts - however this is complicated by variation among states. In addition, a strict separation of powers and strong federalism mediates majoritarianism. An example of this complexity can be seen in the role of the Electoral College in presidential elections, as a result of which a candidate who loses the popular vote may still go on to win the presidency.[13]
^ abcDavid., Arter (2006). Democracy in Scandinavia : consensual, majoritarian or mixed?. Manchester: Manchester University Press. p. 15. ISBN9780719070464. OCLC64555175.
^ abReynal-Querol, Marta (2002). "Political systems, stability and civil wars". Defence and Peace Economics. 13 (6): 465–483. CiteSeerX10.1.1.17.2796. doi:10.1080/10242690214332. S2CID38417520. According to our model the proportional system has a lower probability of rebellion than the majoritarian system. ... Empirically, we find that countries with proportional system has the lowest probability that groups rebel and that the more inclusive is the system, the smaller the probability of suffering a civil war.
^ abEmerson, Peter (2016). From Majority Rule to Inclusive Politics (1st ed.). Cham: Springer. ISBN9783319235004. OCLC948558369. Unfortunately, one of the worst democratic structures is the most ubiquitous: majority rule based on majority voting. It must be emphasised, furthermore, that these two practices are often the catalysts of division and bitterness, if not indeed violence and war.
