To have encyclopedic knowledge is to have "vast and complete"[1] knowledge about a large number of diverse subjects. A person having such knowledge might, sometimes humorously[2] be referred as "a human encyclopedia" or "a walking encyclopedia".[3][4]
The concept of encyclopedic knowledge was once attributed to exceptionally well-read or knowledgeable persons such as Plato, Aristotle, Hildegard von Bingen, Leonardo da Vinci, Immanuel Kant, or G. W. F. Hegel. Tom Rockmore described Hegel, for example, as a polymath and "a modern Aristotle, perhaps the last person to know everything of value that was known during his lifetime."[5] Such persons are generally described as such based on their deep cognitive grasp of multiple and diverse fields of inquiry—an intellectually exceptional subset of philosophers who might also be differentiated from the multi-talented, the genius, or the "Renaissance man."
References in popular culture
The idea of encyclopedic knowledge has made many appearances in popular culture, being especially widespread in detective fiction. In 1887, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle introduced his fictional master sleuth, Sherlock Holmes, who applied his keen deductive acumen and prodigious range of knowledge to solve his cases. Encyclopedia Brown is a series of books by Donald J. Sobol featuring the adventures of boy detective Leroy Brown, nicknamed "Encyclopedia" for his intelligence and range of knowledge that was first published in 1963.
While deep encyclopedic knowledge across numerous fields of inquiry by a single person is no longer feasible, encyclopedic knowledge within a field of inquiry or topic has great historical precedent and is still often ascribed to individuals. For example, it has been said of Raphael Lemkin that "his knowledge of the logic behind the Nazi war machine was encyclopedic."[8]
In 1900, Alexander Graham Bell, who set out to read the entire Encyclopædia Britannica himself,[9] served as the second president of the National Geographic Society and declared the Society should cover "the world and all that is in it."[10] While this goal sounds all-encompassing, it is in fact a statement towards comprehensive geographic knowledge, meaning the scope of the National Geographic Society's enterprise should attempt to be terrestrially unbounded.
In an era of specialization, be it academic, functional, or epistemological, obtaining domain-specific encyclopedic knowledge as an expert is typically celebrated and often rewarded by institutions in modern society. (This appreciation for having extensive niche knowledge, however, should not be confused with the historical experimentation and debate surrounding the division of laborwhich has been argued to limit the knowledge of workers compelled to perform repetitive tasks for the sake of an overall increase in economic productivity.)
Views
Edward Said, in his seminal postcolonial work, Orientalism, examines the encyclopedic endeavor in great detail, saying it is an historically hegemonic enterprise. Orientalists' "unremitting ambition was to master all of a world, not some easily delimited part of it such as an author or a collection of texts."[11]
^Rockmore, Tom (1997). On Art, Religion, and the History of Philosophy: Introductory Lectures by G.W.F. Hegel. Introduction: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. p. ix. ISBN0-87220-370-0. OCLC37282048.
^Adams, Douglas (1979). The hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy (1st ed.). New York: Harmony Books. ISBN1400052920.
^Winter, Jay (June 7, 2013). "Prophet Without Honors". The Chronicle Review: B14. Retrieved 10 June 2013.
^Pauly, Philip J. (1979). "The World and All That is in It: The National Geographic Society, 1888-1918". American Quarterly. 31 (4): 523. doi:10.2307/2712270. JSTOR2712270.