76 mm divisional gun M1942 (ZiS-3)

76-mm divisional gun M1942 (ZiS-3)
ZiS-3 in Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
Type	Field gun
Place of origin	Soviet Union
Service history
In service	1942–1990
Wars	World War II Korean War Vietnam War Cambodian Civil War Portuguese Colonial War Angolan Civil War South African Border War Uganda–Tanzania War Soviet-Afghan War Yugoslav Wars War in Donbass
Production history
Designer	design bureau of No. 92 Artillery Factory headed by V. G. Grabin
Designed	1940
Produced	1941–1945
No. built	103,000+
Specifications
Mass	combat: 1,116 kg (2,460 lbs) travel: 2,150 kg (4,730 lbs)[1]
Barrel length	3.4 m (11 ft 2 in) 42.6 calibers[2]
Width	1.6 m (5 ft 3 in)[2]
Height	1.37 m (4 ft 6 in)[2]
Crew	7 artillerymen
Shell	Fixed QF 76.2 × 385 mm. R[2][3]
Caliber	76.2 mm (3 in)
Breech	Semi-automatic vertical sliding-wedge[2]
Recoil	Hydro-pneumatic[2]
Carriage	Split trail
Elevation	−5° to +37°
Traverse	54°
Rate of fire	up to 25 rounds per minute
Maximum firing range	13.29 km (8.25 mi)

The 76-mm divisional gun M1942 (ZiS-3) (Russian: 76-мм дивизионная пушка обр. 1942 г. (ЗиС-3)) (GRAU index: 52-P-354U) was a Soviet 76.2 mm divisional field gun used during World War II. ZiS was a factory designation and stood for Zavod imeni Stalina ("factory named after Stalin"), the honorific title of Artillery Factory No. 92, which first constructed this gun.

History

Artillery Factory No. 92 began designing the ZiS-3 at the end of 1940. The ZiS-3 combined the light carriage from the 57 mm ZiS-2 anti-tank gun and the powerful 76.2 mm barrel from the F-22USV, the previous divisional field gun. The addition of a muzzle brake reduced recoil and prevented damage to the light carriage upon firing. Producing a ZiS-3 cost only a third of the time and two-thirds of the money of a F-22USV by making greater use of casting, stamping and welding.

V. G. Grabin, the chief designer of Soviet medium caliber guns, initiated the gun's development without state approval, and the prototype was hidden from the state. Marshal Grigory Kulik, commander of Soviet artillery, had ordered a halt to the production of light 45 mm anti-tank guns and 76.2 mm divisional field guns in the belief that they were inadequate; the Soviets overestimated the armour protection of the latest German heavy tanks from propaganda about the Neubaufahrzeug multi-turreted prototype tank.

The beginning of the Great Patriotic War revealed that the pre-war 76 mm guns overmatched German armour; in some cases even 12.7 mm DShK machine guns were adequate. Most of the 76 mm guns were lost early in the war; some captured examples armed German Panzerjäger self-propelled guns. Marshal Kulik ordered the F-22USV back into production. At Artillery Factory No. 92, Grabin put the ZiS-3 into mass production in December 1941.

The factory's ZiS-3 stockpile grew and went unused as the Red Army refused to accept the guns without the usual acceptance trials. Grabin convinced the army to issue the guns for impromptu testing at the front, where it proved superior to existing divisional field guns. A subsequent demonstration impressed Joseph Stalin, who praised the weapon as "a masterpiece of artillery systems design." The ZiS-3 underwent an official five-day acceptance trial in February 1942, and was then accepted into service as divisional field gun model 1942 (full official name). Grabin worked to increase production at Artillery Factory No. 92. Conveyor assembly lines admitted the use of low-skilled labour without significant quality loss. Experienced laborers and engineers worked on complicated equipment and served as brigade leaders; they were replaced on the production line by young factory workers who were exempt from conscription, producing a new generation of skilled labourers and engineers. More than 103,000 ZiS-3s were produced by the end of the war, making it the most numerous Soviet field gun during the war.

Mass production of the ZiS-3 ceased after the war. It was replaced by the 85 mm D-44 divisional field gun. The D-44 had better anti-armour capabilities, but inferior mobility due to its increased weight.

The Finns captured 12 units, and designated them 76 K 42.

Derivatives

At least one ZiS-3 was produced at the Reșița Works in Reșița, Romania, during 1943. This Romanian-produced copy was tested against several Romanian-designed prototypes as well as some foreign models, until eventually one of the Romanian prototypes was selected for serial production as the 75 mm Reșița M1943. This gun had incorporated a number of features from the ZiS-3. At least 375 75 mm Reșița M1943 guns were produced by Romania, including three prototypes; the gun was later mounted on the Mareșal tank destroyer.^[4]

Self-propelled mounts

The SU-76 was an assault gun mounting the ZiS-3 on the chassis of a T-70 light tank. More than 14,000 were produced between 1942 and 1945. The Romanian TACAM R-2 tank destroyer was a R-2 tank converted to mount the ZiS-3 in a three-sided fighting compartment. The KSP-76 was a wartime light assault car mounting the ZiS-3; it did not advance beyond the prototype stage.

Ammunition data

Available ammunition
Type	Model	Weight, kg	HE weight, g
Armour-piercing projectiles (muzzle velocity 700 m/s)
APHE	BR-350A	6.3	155
AP (solid)	BR-350SP	6.5	N/A
Composite Armour-piercing projectiles (muzzle velocity up to ? m/s)
From April 1943	BR-350P	3.02	N/A
Developed after World War II	BR-350N	3.02	N/A
High explosive and fragmentation shells (muzzle velocity 680 m/s)
HE/Fragmentation steel	OF-350	6.2	710
HE/Fragmentation steely iron	OF-350A	6.2	640
Fragmentation steely iron	O-350A	6.21	540
HE/Fragmentation	OF-350B	6.2	540
HE/Fragmentation	OF-363	6.2	540
HE	F-354	6.41	785
HE	F-354M	6.1	815
HE developed in France	F-354F	6.41	785
Other projectiles (muzzle velocity up to 680 m/s)
HEAT, developed after World War II	BK-354	7	740
HEAT, from May 1943	BP-350M	3.94	623
Shrapnel	Sh-354	6.5	85
Shrapnel	Sh-354T	6.66	85
Shrapnel	Sh-354G	6.58	85
Shrapnel	Sh-361	6.61	85
Chemical	OH-350	6.25
Incendiary long-range	Z-350	6.24	240
Incendiary	Z-354	4.65	240
Smoke long-range	D-350	6.45	N/A
Smoke steely iron	D-350A	6.45	N/A

Armour penetration table
AP Projectile BR-350A
Distance, m	Meet angle 60°, mm	Meet angle 90°, mm
100	67	82
500	61	75
1000	55	67
1500	49	60
2000	43	53
These data were obtained by Soviet methods of armour penetration measurement (penetration probability equals 75%). They are not directly comparable with western data of similar type.

Combat history

The tactical characteristics of the 76.2-mm guns (M1939 and 1942) are their high rate of fire, good muzzle velocity, and great maneuverability. These guns are employed in close support of infantry ( tanks), and especially for direct fire. Their primary missions are destruction of personnel and neutralization of infantry weapons in the open; antipersonnel barrages; destruction of tanks, vehicles, embrasures, and dragon's teeth by direct fire; and harassing fire. Secondary missions are accompanying barrages and concentrations; neutralization of artillery and mortars; establishment of smoke screens; and destruction of wire. Exceptional missions are fire reconnaissance, destruction of light materiel with indirect fire, and destruction of minefields.

Technical Manual, TM 30-530^[5]

Soviet soldiers liked the ZiS-3 for its extreme reliability, durability, and accuracy. The gun was easy to maintain and use by novice crews. The light carriage allowed the ZiS-3 to be towed by trucks, heavy jeeps, like American Lend-Lease-supplied Dodge WC-51/WC-52, simply called the 'Dodge 3/4'-tons by Soviet troops – or even manually hauled by the crew if required.

The gun was also quite popular with the German Wehrmacht. The gun was introduced into German service as the 7,62-cm-Feldkanone 288(r) and factories were retooled to produce ammunition for it.

The ZiS-3 had good anti-armour capabilities. Its armour-piercing round could knock out any early German light and medium tank. The frontal armour of later tanks, like the Tiger I and later the Panther, however, were immune to the ZiS-3^{[citation needed]}.

A ZiS-3 battery had four guns, with three batteries making a division or battalion. Independent anti-tank regiments consisted of six batteries with no divisions. A staff battery included a fire-control section.

The ZiS-3 saw combat service with North Korean forces during the Korean War (1950–1953).^[6] It was also deployed by the People's Armed Forces for the Liberation of Angola (FAPLA) during the Angolan Civil War and the South African Border War^[7] and by Tanzania People's Defence Force during the Uganda–Tanzania War in 1978–1979.^[8]

Post-Cold War

The ZiS-3 was exported to Soviet allies during the Cold War, who in turn exported it to Third World countries. In Europe, Austria received about 36 of them in 1955 and kept them in service until 1991 under the designation PaK-M42.^[9] In the 1990s, both the Croatian Army and the Army of the Republic of Serb Krajina used it.^[10]

In 2014, at least one ZiS-3 was used by pro-Russian separatists against the Ukrainian Armed Forces during the War in Donbass.^[11]

In 2016, the gun remained in active service with the armies of at least six sovereign nations: Cambodia, Nicaragua, Namibia, Sudan, Mozambique, and Tanzania.^[12] Mozambique at the time operated the largest number of ZiS-3s, with 180 in service.^[13]

By 2020, the gun only remained in active service with Cambodia, Namibia, Nicaragua, and Sudan.^[14] A number of other nations, including Russia^[15] and Zimbabwe, retain functioning ZiS-3s to fire gun salutes during ceremonial occasions.^[16]

Conflicts

• World War II^[17]
• Vietnam War^[18]
• South African Border War^[7]
• Angolan Civil War^[19][20]
• Uganda–Tanzania War^[8]
• Soviet-Afghan War^[21]
• War in Donbass^[11]

Operators

Current operators

•  Cambodia^[14]: 257
•  Namibia^[14]: 491
•  Nicaragua^[14]: 430
•  Vietnam: At least one gun used by 242nd Island Defense Brigade^[22]
•  Russia: Ceremonial purposes.^[15][23]
•  Sudan^[14]: 504
•  Zimbabwe: Some in service during the early 1980s.^[24][25] Today the ZiS-3 is still used for ceremonial purposes.^[16]

Former operators

•  Democratic Republic of Afghanistan^[26]
•  Algeria^[27]
•  Angola^[28]
  • UNITA^[28]
•  Austria^[9]
•  Republic of the Congo^[28]
•  Cuba^[29]
•  Croatia^[10]
•  Cyprus^[10]
•  Ethiopia^[30]
•  North Korea^[26]
•  Madagascar^[28]
•  Mozambique^[12]
•  Polish People's Republic^[31]
•  Soviet Union^[17]
•  Tanzania^[12]
•  Uganda^[28]
•  North Yemen^[27]
•  Zambia^[28]

Gallery

• 
  A North Korean ZiS-3 captured by United Nations forces during the Incheon Landings in mid-September 1950.
• 
  ZiS-3 displayed at the South African National Museum of Military History, Johannesburg.
• 
  A SU-76 self-propelled gun.
• 
  The Romanian 75 mm Reșița M1943 used features of the 76 mm ZiS-3.
• 
  The prototype Romanian Mareșal tank destroyer which mounted a ZiS-3.
• 
  The Romanian TACAM R-2 tank destroyer which mounted a ZiS-3 gun.

Notes

1. Foedrowitz, Michael (1996). Soviet Field Artillery in World War 2. Schiffer Military History. p. 11.
2. Foss, Christopher (1977). Jane's pocket book of towed artillery. New York: Collier. p. 37. ISBN 0-02-080600-0. OCLC 911907988.
3. "Боеприпасы унитарного заряжания - BATTLEFIELD.RU - всё о Великой Отечественной войне". Archived from the original on 2020-09-15. Retrieved 2019-09-24.
4. Mark Axworthy, London: Arms and Armour, 1995, Third Axis, Fourth Ally: Romanian Armed Forces in the European War, 1941–1945, pp. 149 and 235-237
5. Technical Manual, TM 30-530. Handbook on USSR Military Forces: Chapter V, Tactics. 1 November 1945 page V-50, OCLC: 19989681
6. Utz, Curtis A., Assault From the Sea: The Amphibious Landing at Inchon, Naval Historical Center, Department of the Navy, Washington , D.C., 2000, ISBN 0-945274-27-0, p. 30.
7. "Ratel teen tenk en". Port Elizabeth: International Veterans' Association/South African Forces Club. 2011. Archived from the original on 28 July 2012. Retrieved 20 September 2016.
8. Cooper, Tom; Fontanellaz, Adrien (October 2016). "La guerre du Kagera". Batailles et Blindés (in French). No. 75. Caraktère. pp. 72–81. ISSN 1765-0828.
9. "Rearming Austria: WWII weapons". wwiiafterwwii.wordpress.com. 14 June 2015. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 20 January 2019.
10. "Non‐NATO Europe". The Military Balance. 94 (1): 73–106. 1994. doi:10.1080/04597229408460066.
11. Bender, Jeremy (22 January 2015). "These Are The Weapons That Russia Is Pouring Into Eastern Ukraine". Business Insider. New York. Archived from the original on 19 July 2022. Retrieved 5 April 2024.
12. "Future Artillery Systems: 2016 Market Report" (PDF). Tidworth: Defence IQ. 2016. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 January 2018. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
13. Kruger, Anton; Martin, Guy (23 August 2013). "Armed Forces for the Defence of Mozambique". Johannesburg: DefenceWeb. Archived from the original on 19 March 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
14. International Institute for Strategic Studies (2020). The Military Balance. Vol. 120. Routledge. pp. 257–504. ISBN 978-0-367-46639-8.
15. "Russian troops 'lose' field gun after holiday salute". BBC. London. 24 February 2016. Archived from the original on 13 March 2022. Retrieved 5 April 2024.
16. Chaipa, Edmore (29 November 2013). "Meaning of the Gun Salute". The Herald. Harare, Zimbabwe. Archived from the original on 22 June 2017. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
17. Axelrod, Aaron (2007). Kingston, Jack (ed.). Encyclopedia of World War II, Volume 1. Vol. 1. New York: Facts on File Publishing. pp. 116–117. ISBN 978-0-8160-6022-1.
18. Schuster, Carl Otis; Coffey, David (May 2011). "Vietnam, Democratic Republic of, Army". In Tucker, Spencer C. (ed.). The Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War: A Political, Social, and Military History (2 ed.). p. 1251. ISBN 978-1-85109-960-3.
19. Gleijeses, Piero (2002). Conflicting Missions: Havana, Washington and Africa, 1959–1976. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press. p. 268. ISBN 978-0-807-82647-8.
20. Shubin, Vladimir; Shubin, Gennady; Blanch, Hedelberto (2015). Liebenberg, Ian; Risquet, Jorge (eds.). A Far-Away War: Angola, 1975-1989. Stellenbosch: SUN Press. pp. 87–88. ISBN 978-1920689728.
21. Isby, David C. (1990). The War in Afghanistan 1979-1989: The Soviet Empire at High Tide. Concord Publications. p. 41. ISBN 978-9623610094.
22. "Vui Tết đủ đầy trên đảo tiền tiêu". People's Army Newspaper (Vietnam). 9 February 2024. Retrieved 9 February 2024.
23. "Victory Day fireworks to light up Moscow's skies with colors of Russian national flag". TASS. Moscow. 23 April 2021. Archived from the original on 23 April 2021. Retrieved 5 April 2024.
24. Jane's Armour and Artillery 1985-86. Janes Information Group. 1986. p. 1021.
25. Baynham, Simon (1992). Zimbabwe in transition. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell International. pp. 239–242. ISBN 978-9122015086.
26. "Asia and Australasia". The Military Balance. 90 (1): 148–181. 1990. doi:10.1080/04597229008460022.
27. "The Middle East and North Africa". The Military Balance. 90 (1): 97–122. 1990. doi:10.1080/04597229008460020.
28. "Sub‐Saharan Africa". The Military Balance. 90 (1): 123–147. 1990. doi:10.1080/04597229008460021.
29. "Caribbean and Latin America". The Military Balance. 90 (1): 182–206. 1990. doi:10.1080/04597229008460023.
30. International Institute for Strategic Studies (2012). "Chapter Nine: Sub-Saharan Africa". The Military Balance. 112 (1): 434. doi:10.1080/04597222.2012.663218. S2CID 219628672.
31. "Muzeum Wojska Polskiego w Warszawie".

References

• Shunkov V. N. - The Weapons of the Red Army, Mn. Harvest, 1999 (Шунков В. Н. - Оружие Красной Армии. — Мн.: Харвест, 1999.) ISBN 978-985-433-469-1

External links

• Ammunition data on BattleField.Ru Archived 2007-09-29 at the Wayback Machine
• 76.2mm Divisional Gun M1942 (ZiS-3) gallery in Modelling Market in Poland magazine
• Photo gallery at svsm.org
• Soviet Guns 76 mm calibre (Tank & AT) armor penetration table