Price made an allegation in Parliament in December 1916 that Ashford acted corruptly in relation to £80,000 spent on a deviation of the railway line between Dubbo and Werris Creek.[2] The following year Price made further allegations against Ashford, including that saw mills were being bought at excess values, salaries were being paid that were not authorised by Parliament and that the government had sold land at £4 per acre and then later resumed it for returned soldiers at a price of £8 5s, an excess cost of £36,000.[3]John Storey (Labor), the Leader of the Opposition, stated that he did not take much notice of statements made by Price, but that if the Minister did not take action against Price "the public will have a right to assume that something wrong is going on".[3]
The response of the government was to appoint Montgomerie Hamilton, a Judge of the District Court,[4] to conduct a Royal Commission into Price's allegations.[5][a] The Royal Commission concluded that "the charges made by Mr Price against Mr Ashford were made wantonly and recklessly, and without any foundation whatsoever".[7]
The report of the Royal Commission was read in the Legislative Assembly and the contents published in Hansard, which then held, by a vote of 46 to 11, that Price was "guilty of conduct unworthy of a member of Parliament and seriously reflecting upon the honor and dignity of this House". The house then resolved, by a vote of 35 to 20, that Price be expelled from the Legislative Assembly.[7]
Being expelled from Parliament however was not a barrier to re-election and Price re-contested the seat. The Labor Party did not nominate a candidate and the Taree Branch of the Labor Party supported Price to embarrass the government.[8]
Dates
Date
Event
13 December 1916
Richard Price made allegations about deviations on the Dubbo to Werris Creek railway line.[2]
5 September 1917
Richard price makes further allegations concerning the purchase of saw mills, payment of salaries and purchase of land for soldiers.[3]
20 September 1917
Judge Montgomerie Hamilton was appointed Royal Commissioner.[5]
12 October 1917
Judge Montgomerie Hamilton published the report of the Royal Commission.[7]
^It has subsequently been questioned whether the Royal Commission was "a place out of Parliament" and potentially inconsistent with Article 9 of the Bill of Rights 1689 which provides "That the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in Parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Parliament".[6]