Nasionalisme budaya

Nasionalisme budaya adalah bentuk nasionalisme di mana bangsa ditentukan oleh budaya bersama. Ia menempati posisi tengah antara nasionalisme etnis dan nasionalisme sipil.^[1] Oleh karena itu, ini berfokus pada identitas nasional yang dibentuk oleh tradisi budaya dan bahasa yang sama, tetapi tidak pada konsep nenek moyang, ras, atau etnis yang sama.^[2]

"Nasionalisme budaya" cenderung tidak terwujud dalam gerakan independen, tetapi merupakan posisi moderat dalam spektrum ideologi nasionalis yang lebih luas. Dengan demikian, posisi moderat dalam nasionalisme Flandria^[3] atau Hindu^[4] mungkin merupakan "nasionalisme budaya", sementara gerakan yang sama ini juga mencakup bentuk nasionalisme etnis dan mistisisme nasional.

Literatur

• David Aberbach, 2008, Jewish Cultural Nationalism: Origins and Influences, ISBN 0-415-77348-2
• Kosaku Yoshino, 1992, Cultural Nationalism in Contemporary Japan: A Sociological Enquiry, ISBN 0-415-07119-4
• J. Ellen Gainor, 2001, Performing America: Cultural Nationalism in American Theater, ISBN 0-472-08792-4
• G. Gordon Betts, 2002, The Twilight of Britain: Cultural Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and the Politics of Toleration, ISBN 0-7658-0731-9
• Yingjie Guo, 2004, Cultural Nationalism in Contemporary China: The Search for National Identity under Reform, ISBN 0-415-32264-2
• Mike Featherstone, 1990, Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity, ISBN 0-8039-8322-0
• Starrs, Roy, 2004, Japanese Cultural Nationalism: At Home and in the Asia Pacific. London: Global Oriental. 2004. ISBN 1-901903-11-7. 
• Vincent Martigny, 2016, Dire la France. Culture(s) et identités nationales, ISBN 9-782-72461-9485

Referensi

1. Nielsen, Kai. (1999). Cultural nationalism, neither ethnic nor civic. In R. Beiner (Ed.), Theorizing nationalism (pp. 119-130). Albany: State University of New York Press.
2. "History of Europe: Cultural nationalism". Encyclopædia Britannica. Diakses tanggal 2008-02-16. The counterpart of this political idea [i.e. the revolutionary doctrine of the sovereignty of the people] in the 19th century is cultural nationalism. The phrase denotes the belief that each nation in Europe had from its earliest formation developed a culture of its own, with features as unique as its language, even though its language and culture might have near relatives over the frontier. 
3. Kymlicka, Will. (1999). Misunderstanding nationalism. In R. Beiner (Ed.), Theorizing nationalism (pp. 131-140). Albany: State University of New York Press, p. 133; Nielsen, Kai. (1999). Cultural nationalism, neither ethnic nor civic. In R. Beiner (Ed.), Theorizing nationalism (pp. 119-130). Albany: State University of New York Press, p. 126
4. Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, one of the main votaries of Hindutva has stated that it believes in a cultural connotation of the term Hindu. "The term Hindu in the conviction as well as in the constitution of the RSS is a cultural and civilizational concept and not a political or religious dogma. The term as a cultural concept will include and did always include all Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Muslims, Christians and Parsis. The cultural nationality of India, in the conviction of the RSS, is Hindu and it was inclusive of all who are born and who have adopted Bharat as their Motherland, including Muslims, Christians and Parsis. The answering association submit that it is not just a matter of RSS conviction, but a fact borne out by history that the Muslims, Christians and Parsis too are Hindus by culture although as religions they are not so." Quoting RSS General Secretary's reply to the Tribunal constituted under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 to hear the case on the RSS, Organiser, June 6, 1993

Pranala luar

• Cultural Nationalism