Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following one or more categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Shortcuts WP:VIPWP:VIP WP:AIVWP:AIV WP:ANVWP:ANV WP:UFAAWP:UFAA This page is to report vandals, spammers, and usernames that violate the username policy...
Click to read more »(Admins only, sorry) shows only 15 QD's. I also only see four edits to WP:VIP (Only 3 of the edits were reports) and it looks like only one of those reports...
Click to read more »already blocked. In the future, it’s better to report users like this at WP:VIP. Garsh (talk) 18:23, 31 July 2026 (UTC) Persistent disruptive editing (long-term...
Click to read more »didn't like someone's personnal life or even not having enough qd tags and VIP reports. But that's not the worst thing. The worst thing is that they did...
Click to read more »Sure. Content creation looks great. QD's look good. Most of his reports to VIP look good. I can't find any real issues. Should be a good admin. Good luck...
Click to read more »salted for a month. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC) Hey Duggee: Vip Help Desk (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close...
Click to read more »(see contribs), created many pages (see his userpage), has several correct VIP reports (see 1, 2, 3, and 4), and 20+ QD tags. He has proven to be trustworthy...
Click to read more »about 10 QD tags and 1 report to VIP; in 8 months, that isn't very many (not sure, but comparing to my 65 QD's and 10 VIP reports in 3 months it isn't anyway)...
Click to read more »Chenzw Talk 01:49, 17 April 2016 (UTC) User:AdrianHernandez1/Draft:NBL VIP (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request Nepaxt...
Click to read more »giving them the attention they want: Revert and ignore them Report to WP:VIP and let an administrator block them Do not talk about them on your user page...
Click to read more »make a very good administrator, however I don't see enough discussion or VIP reports for my liking. Granted, users don't always reach 4 warnings, but...
Click to read more »article that was sent to RfD. CombatIndia is already blocked. Was reported to VIP but doesn't necessarily confirm they are identical so reporting here to make...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:VIPWP:VIP WP:AIVWP:AIV WP:ANVWP:ANV WP:UFAAWP:UFAA This page is to report vandals, spammers, and usernames that violate the username policy...
Click to read more »places (such as nominating good/featured articles). Also, I will use WP:VIP more often. Note: I'm dropping out because of Razorflame's comments. He makes...
Click to read more »Sysop flag, he has at least 50 VIP reports, I’m guessing that’s a record, but I’m not sure. As well as clerking for the VIP. He has hundreds of deleted edits...
Click to read more »agree with everything above. Synergy 21:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Keep - VIP are one of the most linked-to pages from RfAs and such. They should be kept...
Click to read more »10:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC) I haven't protected VIP because the vandalism is rare - or did you mean the VIP page should be used to report more often? Kennedy...
Click to read more »sure you'll be a good administrator. Looking through WP:VIP archives, I really only saw 1 VIP report, which is not enough to show you'll use the block...
Click to read more »contributions to Wikipedia: namespace! You have never: reported vandalism at WP:VIP, taken part in a WP:RFD, tagged an article for WP:QD, discussed anything...
Click to read more »administrator. I'll use the tools to evaluate entries the the QD list and on the VIP list as per the policies. I won't act in ways that are inappropriate for...
Click to read more »to mention and made over 60 VIP reports, treating vandals fairly, with good faith until no other course of action bar VIP remains. He always seems to...
Click to read more »our procedures, as evidenced by 1) inappropriate/premature reports at WP:VIP and 2) the way this RfA was incorrectly created. The user has also apparently...
Click to read more »on editing, including a fair amount of Mainspace edits, some QD tagging, VIP reports vandalsim reverting as always. Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 22:03...
Click to read more »I'm consistently impressed with both your article work as well as your VIP reports and QD nominations. Keep doing what you are doing! :) Lauryn (u •...
Click to read more »"agree with above"; sixteen projectspace edits overall, with one edit to VIP, which means that you have no use for the block tool. Edits Access to the...
Click to read more »-- This is a hoax and I've tagged it as such and reported the creator to VIP for continued hoaxing. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:04, 30 June 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »continue my patrolling work by taking care of QD requests and requests at WP:VIP. Thank you for your consideration! eurodyne (talk) 19:43, 26 June 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »active here. I now have ~350 edits, lots of vandalism reverted, reports to VIP, CSD tagging and other helpful tasks. I have RB and PCR on English Wikipedia...
Click to read more »all considering the vandalism level on simple. He also has 5 reports to VIP which is also good. Anyway, I think Shapiros10 would make a great admin,...
Click to read more »Function: Keep VIP clear of blocked users Description: This bot will clear requests at WP:VIP where the users have been blocked. I notice that VIP is always...
Click to read more »easily see how much vandalism is going on by looking at recent changes or WP:VIP. Only (talk) 23:10, 14 May 2017 (UTC) Please discuss this request below,...
Click to read more »Honestly, you're too good of a user to ever fail an RfA, you report too many VIPs, QD too many pages and work on too many articles to be denied. You're been...
Click to read more »November 2008 (UTC) Support – Sure. Great vandalism fighter. Had to use WP:VIP numerous times. – RyanCross (talk) 19:13, 30 November 2008 (UTC) Strong support...
Click to read more »has around 500 deleted pages, because of the qd-tags. He has made lots of VIP reports of vandals, which he could block himself if he had the tools. He...
Click to read more »would disagree with? If so, why? I have observed that you have less than 10 VIP reports and have been involved in about 80 RFDs over the last few years....
Click to read more »all retained in the page history of ViP, so what is the point? Because it saves a few clicks when finding out ViP reports for RfAs? Puh-lease. Just go...
Click to read more »deletion tool to good use as an administrator. She has also made about five WP:VIP reports. It may not be much... but we don't get that much vandalism, so I...
Click to read more »to request the rollback feature (which administrators can grant). See WP:VIP to report vandalism. Add this page to your list of watched pages — Purge...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2016/User:AdrianHernandez1/Draft:NBL VIP. Chenzw Talk 04:50, 2 May 2016 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »editing every single day. I actively revert vandalism and make use of WP:VIP to report vandals and make use of WP:AN for more complicated requests. I...
Click to read more »accurate WP:QD requests he has done, his help in reverting vandalism, the WP:VIP reports he has done (I admit not many, but I assume this isn't his main area)...
Click to read more »including Tim Henman, NASA, Halo 3 and Earth. I don't have a huge amount of VIP reports, about 9 or 10 but out of them only 1 or 2 were not blocked, not...
Click to read more »just report it to WP:VIP when appropriate. Thanks, RyanCross (talk) 12:23, 30 June 2008 (UTC) By the way, I have created Template:VIP, copied from EN's en:Template:AIV...
Click to read more »vandalism accompanied by the right level of warnings and by reports to WP:VIP? Is the editor contributing (constructively, not by voting) to RfDs? Users...
Click to read more »more specific. It's an option in the drop down under VIP when reporting users. User page -> TW -> VIP -> check the box with Vandalism after recent (within...
Click to read more »reporting to WP:VIP. I've also been helping at WP:AFD here and there. If my request is successful, I would like to mainly focus my time on WP:VIP and CAT:QD...
Click to read more »been tagging pages for deletion, reverting vandalism, and making reports on VIP. I'd love to take care of those things myself, rather than asking others...
Click to read more »the left linking to the Administrators notice board, and maybe one to WP:VIP too?-- Chris†ianMan16 t c r 02:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Unneeded, in my...
Click to read more »a global rollbacker. Mercy requested about 100 QDs and has made several VIP reports. I think Mercy can be trusted with the tools. Good luck! Barras (talk)...
Click to read more »BarrasBot (t · c) Barras Talk page archives, clears fulfilled reports at WP:VIP Cewbot (t · c) Kanashimi Fixing broken anchors, adding {{Unsigned}}, and...
Click to read more »the last RFA)? Answer: Well, there has been some QD tagging, but not any VIP reports. TurboGolf 06:14, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Do you understand what the...
Click to read more »here and still learning how we do things. You also reported a user at WP:VIP who had not vandalized, which shows that you don't always recognize what's...
Click to read more »recommend reporting to WP:VIP if they continue the disruptive editing. Darubrub (Let me know) 15:48, 23 April 2021 (UTC) VIP is if in progress. This particular...
Click to read more »things I've done that may help demonstrate that I know how to use the tools: VIP [1] Vandalism cleaning [2] [3] Note: Looks like a test edit as opposed to...
Click to read more »as I'm not an admin, but I see very little in the form of user warnings, VIP reports etc. The majority of your User talk: edits are either welcoming users...
Click to read more »contributing to community discussions at ST, RfA, RfD, etc. I've also made a few VIP reports, made at least a hundred QD noms, and contributed to PGA/PVGA. I...
Click to read more »--Peterdownunder (talk) 00:53, 16 July 2011 (UTC) As always I searched VIP reports and QD requests from the user in search of something scary, and grunny...
Click to read more »they used to; some vandalism remains unnoticed and LTA cases sit stale at VIP. Another admin or two definitely wouldn't hurt, but we're also not in a dying...
Click to read more »delete button, cause you don't tag things for QD, you have zero reports to VIP, no need for the block button, and your not active on recent changes patrol...
Click to read more »administrator here. Has already done quite a bit of work such as reporting to WP:VIP, participating in WP:RFDs, tagging articles that needed to be deleted for...
Click to read more »...
Click to read more »ViP page due to the nature of how it works... so I am assuming some other bot is meant. Goblin 19:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC) Frankly I find archiving VIP reports...
Click to read more »the mistakes he has made and has improved. He has hundreds of QDs, several VIP reports and 2 VGAs and 1 GA apart from few DYKs. He also runs 4 bots, which...
Click to read more »instead of constantly reverting, it's best to request sysop attention via VIP or if there is no response and the vandal's continuing, ping admins on IRC...
Click to read more »this, vandal fighting is not my strength, so I don't have a great number of VIP requests, though I think my reverting and occasional reports there will demonstrate...
Click to read more »can give detailed explanations at VIP, also. -- Auntof6 (talk) 17:36, 24 August 2022 (UTC) Done submitted at VIP. DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 20:41, 17 February 2022 (UTC) Weak oppose Your VIP reports and QD requests are good, I think you just need experience in other...
Click to read more »have left a note on his talk page telling him not to, but may report to VIP if it continues. Computer Fizz (talk) 04:17, 2 March 2020 (UTC) I will continue...
Click to read more »have much in the way of vandalism fighting. With about 200 QDs, only 11 VIP reports, and the issues raised in the questions (if that had happened at...
Click to read more »Operator: LemonSlushie Programming language: Pywikibot, Javascript. Function: VIP Clerking Description: The bot would merge duplicate bot and user reported...
Click to read more »bsa, who never use vip at all. However I have stopped after that, and probably won't even edit at all for admins that I know do use vip. Computer Fizz (talk)...
Click to read more »clears VIP every few hours or so. A bot that reminds admins to clear the VIP would be much more annoying since we always block users after reading a VIP report...
Click to read more »on the wiki so e end just having to report them, put their names on the VIP page, and just wait for someone to delete the pages while, in the meantime...
Click to read more »of which have been WP:QD taggings, and has made a few contributions to WP:VIP. His article work is certainly very helpful to Wikipedia, and has improved...
Click to read more »spiky ouch 12:26, 4 July 2024 (UTC) I noticed, was reporting them to WP:VIP but you beat me to it :).- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 12:28, 4...
Click to read more »(UTC) Done --vector ^_^ (talk) 05:46, 21 April 2009 (UTC) You can use WP:VIP for this... Goblin 08:07, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Resolved. REASON:This user...
Click to read more »party. --Isis♠(talk) 01:44, 18 October 2008 (UTC) Nah. Mortals are in the VIP, but we're the bouncers, we can block on sight (kick people off for a time)...
Click to read more »at VIP, please respond to the report to let the rest of us know that it has been handled. Over the last few days, I have responded to quite a few VIP reports...
Click to read more »November 2016 (UTC) Oppose you lack experience, are you often present on WP:VIP, WP:AN, QD? no that's not a appropiate time to give you the tools Apipo1907...
Click to read more »alone. So, obviously he could use that button. Also, he has also done many VIP reports, for example, here and here. In his previous RfA (essay mania), he...
Click to read more »RFD. He is an excellent vandalism fighter and has several rollbacks and ViP reports. I think he will assist the community greatly if he becomes an admin...
Click to read more »However, I don't think you have sufficient experience in admin-y things like VIP, QDing, reverting vandalism etc. I don't see too much activity in the Wikipedia...
Click to read more »stay (sic)! 19:28, 8 July 2010 (UTC) Note: User has just under 75 QDs and 8 VIP reports. Griffinofwales (talk) 13:46, 3 July 2010 (UTC) Oh, yes. I should...
Click to read more »rather small wiki. If any usernames need attention, just report them to WP:VIP. Chenzw Talk 03:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Or the WP:Administrators noticeboard...
Click to read more »history of Powderfinger where you didn't seem to report this vandal at WP:VIP. I'm not too concerned about QD'ing new articles wrong, but the Flushing...
Click to read more »(after the user has received several warnings), you can report them on WP:VIP. See Wikipedia:Vandalism for more information on how to deal with it. Archer7...
Click to read more »the support - tholly --Talk-- 15:44, 3 October 2008 (UTC) Support - only 3 VIP reports wouldn't suggest much use for the blocking tool, but 130 or so QD's...
Click to read more »doing this. Asking an admin to take care of this as this is too complex for VIP. Not only is this disruptive, but they also don't give attribution. SHB2000...
Click to read more »adminship and understanding of policy, and they are also very active at VIP, with gnomish work, like with categories, and other areas, in which MathXplore...
Click to read more »been blocked so I just blocked again. In your case you can report them to VIP and/or warn. 195 was warned a bunch but hasn't edited in hours so I didn't...
Click to read more »above under "Constitutional crisis". I did tell you-all that this was a VIP issue about the boundaries between the wikis and the Foundation, but you...
Click to read more »contribs · count) (assign permissions) I revert vandalism a lot, report to V.I.P and I am a former rollback. I would like to have my permissions back as...
Click to read more »adnnins faces is insulting towards admins like you. I don't know if it fits in VIP so I put it here. kolva | chat? 19:14, 8 February 2022 (UTC) @Kolva: That...
Click to read more »hoax creator report it to Wikipedia:RCU (for sock cases). Also go Wikipedia:VIP (remember it is for vandalism/disruptive report cases only). DMK-C5 (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators#Current issues and requests looked at? I reported an IP WP:VIP yesterday, and nobody has commented on it yet; and administrators have been...
Click to read more »Yes; {{qd|spam}}. mC8 20:42, 27 August 2008 (UTC) Hang on; userpage? Erm... VIP report filed; just wait for an indef block and it is deleted anyway! Microchip...
Click to read more »positive impact on the wiki. He has over 200 quick deletion requests, about 30 ViP reports, and in addition he also alerts administrators to users that need...
Click to read more »(UTC) Oppose No QD tagging, no Wikipedia edits (except for this RFA), no VIP reports, nothing...an excellent mainspace contributor but nothing that requires...
Click to read more »undoing my edits and restoring the vandalism I removed. I reported the user to VIP at 21:31 UTC but an admin wasn't on to block the user for another 45 minutes...
Click to read more »is, that I can take care of the issues as I see them versus, waiting on a VIP or QD to be performed or either talk page message an admin, or track one...
Click to read more »mention further that Huggle supposedly allows for a specific section to insert VIP/AIV reports (see "aiv-section"), but is not being implemented correctly (or...
Click to read more »--Auntof6 (talk) 01:47, 18 January 2016 (UTC) Can we get action over at WP:VIP? Ipadguy (talk) 01:49, 18 January 2016 (UTC) Done. In future, please be more...
Click to read more »end of August 2008, and in that time he has had over 100 QD tags and many VIP reports. He was originally made an administrator in December and before stepping...
Click to read more »also made a number of personal attacks, both on my talk page and on the VIP page. Just now the user said I was harrasing his/her talk page when I only...
Click to read more »use IRC , due to the usage of the stalkword and it being more common than VIP here. For what it is worth though, I would not oppose due to your edit count...
Click to read more »Wales" vandal and the "Ghosts eat toast". Please report such edits to WP:VIP right away, and please ask for CU also. I've range blocked, but more will...
Click to read more »admins (an LTA is currently having free reign whilst the report is sat at VIP) -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 09:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC) In so many cases...
Click to read more »response: since both of his edits were vandalism, you should report him to WP:VIP (vandalism in progress), for future reference. WP:AN isn't for vandalism...
Click to read more »vandal fighting (even though not many are around) and increase my edits to WP:VIP. I also hope to mature more in this process. Those are just some of the things...
Click to read more »template. With the limited wikipedia space edits, the fact that there are zero VIP reports is not surprising at all. All told, you have shown no need for the...
Click to read more »reporting vandals (although a lot of our recent reports were mine ;)) to WP:VIP which shows he would do well with the block tool. Well. I think American...
Click to read more »Normandie Talk! 13:23, 16 December 2010 (UTC) Somebody need to check out WP:VIP. One report has been on there since 10 am. Mr. Berty (seasons greetings!)...
Click to read more »possible to write a script or bot that automatically removes blocked users from VIP? It's done this way at enwiki AIV. –Juliancolton | Talk 17:48, 15 March 2010...
Click to read more »to aid such things as Kennedy's Wikiproject Collaboration, or to discuss VIP issues in real time. It could be used for such things as discussion for WP:AN;...
Click to read more »on my QD tags and my vandalism reversions, I have about 8 reports to WP:VIP I currently have 4,178 edits to this Wikipedia with the earliest being 06:20...
Click to read more »on a per-page basis. In fact, we have a working example right now, at WP:VIP. Chenzw Talk 15:36, 11 May 2010 (UTC) Check out w:Wikipedia:Editnotice...
Click to read more »changes. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:35, 12 January 2017 (UTC) This was addressed at WP:VIP. Please keep vandalism reports there. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:58, 12 January...
Click to read more »accounts as being LTAs, just report accounts doing undesirable things to VIP. Checkusers/admins will deal with them, and I will note CUs have ways of...
Click to read more »ANI and all other possible pages where drama can be caused and keep open VIP for vandals. Barras (talk) 16:48, 5 September 2009 (UTC) You're right Barras...
Click to read more »Partly due to a severe vandal attack that happened a few days ago. See WP:VIP. Chenzw (talk ▪ changes) 01:20, 6 April 2008 (UTC) The above adminship discussion...
Click to read more »user.--≈ Lights χ 19:18, 28 August 2008 (UTC) I would have put in on WP:VIP but I wasn't sure. Don't know where they get all these computers to edit...
Click to read more »often, 4 warnings are not needed. However, I have encountered issues with VIP reports being declined for users not being warned 4 times (both on SEWP and...
Click to read more »of vandalism, blocked at other projects etc. Usually I report a user to VIP after 2-3 warnings, although 0-1 is something I would do if necessary, although...
Click to read more »now, although it all seems to be coming from one IP range, as listed on VIP. In any case, I will keep an eye. --IWI (talk) 20:40, 14 October 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »you don't need to contact "active users". If its vandalism, put it on WP:VIP. If its a general question you have put it on this page. -Djsasso (talk)...
Click to read more »must be registered and not an IP (obviously) Users must be active in WP:VIP, etc Users must be active in community discussions, etc Having the Unwatched...
Click to read more »hem or her to Snowy Cotton Candy (talk) 03:59, 31 December 2021 (UTC) WP:VIP MathXplore (talk) 04:45, 31 December 2021 (UTC) @Snowy Cotton Candy: If someone...
Click to read more »7 January 2018 (UTC) Done, BUT the place for this kind of request is WP:VIP, or at least the admins' noticeboard.. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:42, 7 January...
Click to read more »reverted active vandals, requested QDs of their pages, and reported them at VIP. With the mop, he/she could have deleted and blocked on the spot instead...
Click to read more »have little need for it. I think it can be handled at either WP:AN or WP:VIP. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:00, 5 March 2016 (UTC) @Auntof6: Yeah, but we don't...
Click to read more »Je_practique_la_bande Done. If no admin seems to be online, then use WP:VIP next time.--♠ Lights talk 12:21, 26 May 2008 (UTC) In the short space...
Click to read more »11:34, 24 August 2021 (UTC) No need to notify here, you could report to WP:VIP if you wanted to like you would any other vandalism. Because IPs can theoretically...
Click to read more »Operator873talkconnect 05:47, 21 February 2019 (UTC) Clearing responded user reported VIP reports per a determined duration? Archiving RFPs?--Cohaf (talk) 05:53, 21...
Click to read more »contributes at RfD, WP:ANI, Simple Talk, WP:RA, WP:PGA, WP:VGA, WP:RFA, WP:VIP and WP:WANT, he s also a judge at Wikicup,. He also runs two bots. So, to...
Click to read more »administrative areas like fighting vandalism, making reports on WP:AN as well as WP:VIP. He regularly tags pages for deletion and assists with recent changes. I...
Click to read more »Not always. Many times I've caught active vandals that weren't reported at VIP yet and blocked them with no warnings. Blocks are to prevent damage, and...
Click to read more »simple solution would be that we create an Abuse project (or subpage of AN/VIP) and start keeping track of attack pages / repeat vandals. If we find that...
Click to read more »changes The change of the Wikimedia image scaling system from ImageMagick to VipsScaler (announced in the previous issue) has been postponed until bug #51370...
Click to read more »"Wikipedia:" article. IWI (chat) 02:09, 23 May 2020 (UTC) There is an IP on VIP that needs to be blocked urgently. IWI (chat) 00:39, 23 May 2020 (UTC) Globally...
Click to read more »featured in New York Fashion Week and on the Daily Front Row. https://www.vip-times.co.jp/?talent_id=M17-0880 https://fashionweekdaily...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete Win one thing, and that is definitely your VIP pass to a Wikipedia article (note the usage of definitely). Anyways, clear...
Click to read more »14:39, 11 June 2015 (UTC) Don't think it's necessary anymore and also WP:VIP instead of AN. -Barras talk 17:28, 11 June 2015 (UTC) (change conflict) I...
Click to read more »keep up the WP:QD tagging, your article work, vandalism reverting, and WP:VIP reporting (helps administrators see who needs to be blocked if they're not...
Click to read more »on articles more. 3) I haven't seem much much QD tags and VIP reports recently. Your last VIP report was... a month ago. IMHO, I haven't seem much or any...
Click to read more »@Griffinofwales: --Trade (talk) 00:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC) Not done - Stale report - use VIP for future block evasion. Thanks! Griff (talk) 00:18, 5 June 2022 (UTC) I...
Click to read more »"block-on-sight", where if this LTA is spotted it can be reported to WP:VIP without going through the standard 5 warnings, as this editor has a long...
Click to read more »Special:Upload (Upload file): upload a file to the wiki. Special:VipsTest (VIPS scaling test page) Special:WhatLinksHere: enables listing all pages...
Click to read more »editor numbers. I do wish generally more attention was paid to places like VIP and sometimes AN. There was one case recently where a report to AN was missed...
Click to read more »necessary (which this doesn't seem to be) based on what Djsasso wrote about on VIP a few days ago. (see [1]) Vermont (talk) 23:47, 17 October 2018 (UTC) You...
Click to read more »prompted warnings on his/her talk page and a report at WP:VIP. I declined to act on the VIP report because I felt the changes were done in good faith...
Click to read more »explaination which could be used to show understanding of policy. Only 4 edits to VIP, all about the same incident and using the reason "Extremely long username"...
Click to read more »look, and I didn't see any quick deletion requests, or any reports to WP:VIP. These two areas are very important, as they are where you would be working...
Click to read more »nominator.--BRP ever 01:05, 29 August 2022 (UTC) Support Lots of reports at VIP, and QD requests, and I've noticed Fehufanga almost always is correct with...
Click to read more »31 July 2008 (UTC) Six acts of vandalism in a row. Just put this on WP:VIP Staeiou (talk) 04:43, 31 July 2008 (UTC) The IP in question is part of the...
Click to read more »indicating a QD tag were in his own user space. No need for ban - Three Vip reports at end of August, 1 back in June. Extremely low main space editing...
Click to read more »deleted edits, which are not quite enough and you've made one edit to WP:VIP. Although you probably participate more in RfD here, there isn't enough reason...
Click to read more »PeterSymonds (talk) 16:52, 13 December 2009 (UTC) Hey guys. There has been a request at VIP for a few days now. It is probably stale, but you might wanna look at it...
Click to read more »wouldn't waste your time because the user is not caring. I also tagged them at VIP just now. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 21:51, 3 June 2021 (UTC) @PotsdamLamb:...
Click to read more »vandals that if they vandalise more even after having been reported to WP:VIP, "the block may be extended". Chenzw Talk 05:42, 10 December 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »main space), 19 log actions, 5 QD requests, 5 anti-vandalism reverts and no VIP reports. This does not demonstrate a need for the extra permissions, which...
Click to read more »article writer/simplifier. Good experience with WP:QD tagging and some WP:VIP reporting also. Has most of the qualities I expect in admin-candidates. Will...
Click to read more »been blocked by Werdan7. Oysterguitarist 14:45, 28 November 2007 (UTC) You can go to WP:VIP for vandals. JetLover Bam! 22:32, 29 November 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Block/Lock evasion See Special:Diff/9452242; also see my comments on WP:VIP regarding this editor. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 23:17...
Click to read more »user rights (such as rollbacker and patroller). I will frequently watch WP:VIP and WP:RFD. (as it frequently gets backlogged, sometimes by days) The only...
Click to read more »answers. --@intforce 14:10, 12 September 2012 (UTC) Q: Say an editor made a VIP report and the request concerns an IP which vandalised several more pages...
Click to read more »editing I've had to nominate a few pages for deletion, and even send a user to VIP. I never thought it would come to this, but I kinda feel like this wiki needs...
Click to read more »report. Remember that WP:VIP really is the place for reports and will usually get a response quicker than AN, as people watch VIP for reports and may not...
Click to read more »Bersekerus to WP:VIP when he blatantly was not vandalizing. FSM Noodly? 19:59, 26 October 2008 (UTC) Zephyrad only has one edit on WP:VIP and that was from...
Click to read more »"Atlasia". Jim Michael (talk) 09:06, 3 June 2016 (UTC) Should be posted at WP:VIP. I have given this IP a long block. They have been blocked 10 times in the...
Click to read more »January 2023 (UTC) A question @MathXplore, why didn't you report it to WP:VIP? Dibyojyotilet's chat 11:26, 11 January 2023 (UTC) Final warning has not...
Click to read more »through your contributions from, erm, excuse me, a year ago (:O), I see no WP:VIP reports which shows no need for the block tool. Anyway, some positives would...
Click to read more »that created a page such as the one listed above and have listed it on the ViP page. Razorflame 17:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC) An anon IP user, 24.16.56.60 (talk ·...
Click to read more »also block vandals and spammers reported at VIP. Currently I tag pages for deletion and report vandals to VIP, but in most cases I would delete or block...
Click to read more »--Auntof6 (talk) 20:44, 17 November 2011 (UTC) Resolved. According to WP:VIP using {{username|type=warning}} should only be a warning. However I've tested...
Click to read more »seems to be very active on IRC, which I've been told is usually faster than VIP page. I also like that he is open to answering questions and engaging with...
Click to read more »Doesn't seem a particularly "usefull" or sensible idea. Report vandals to VIP. Majorly talk 17:30, 20 March 2009 (UTC) Please unprot User:NonvocalScream/OpenPGP...
Click to read more »thanks. Griffinofwales (talk) 19:29, 23 May 2010 (UTC) Please report on WP:VIP next time. Thanks! EhJJTALK 19:30, 23 May 2010 (UTC) Can all of this IP's...
Click to read more »October 2020 (UTC) There is an issue when using Twinkle to report users to VIP. See this as an example. --IWI (talk) 14:01, 5 October 2020 (UTC) Seems to...
Click to read more »allowed for article purposes, and we should make allowances for things such as VIP and, if absolutely necessary, AN/ST. All of the restrictions should last...
Click to read more »months, but they would need to have done a lot of quick deletion requests, VIP reports, and some edits to WP:AN and WP:ST would also be nice. Looking through...
Click to read more »What I intend to do/Why I want to run for adminship Many Backlogs in, WP:VIP, WP:PERM, and Quick Deletion Requests, etc I see many bad pages being created...
Click to read more »to take. By the way, we have a page for reporting vandalism. It's at WP:VIP. Unless the vandalism is very offensive, which I don't see with this editor...
Click to read more »(UTC) Oppose only 3 against strong edits, no revocation, never seen on WP:VIP or on Recent Changes and no presence on WP:AN. Your experience on en.wikipedia...
Click to read more »user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Report originally from WP:VIP diff by Griffinofwales. Pmlineditor Talk 10:51, 29 August 2009 (UTC) Ricardojose20027...
Click to read more »code for adding stub templates twinklearv: advanced reporting users to WP:VIP twinklexfd: comfortable way of requesting RfD twinklesharedip: adding shared-ip...
Click to read more »Purplebackpack. Quick reporting. You can also report similar users at WP:VIP. Classical Esther♣ 03:00, 12 March 2010 (UTC) I was hitting him for CLUE...
Click to read more »in 2 1/2 months) and reasonable need for blocking (8 times had to use WP:ViP). Appears to have general understanding of our policies and a strong level...
Click to read more »back to the RFA, I wish to serve the community, assisting with QD requests, VIP reports, Page Protections, RFD closures, and to stop spam and disruptive...
Click to read more »of participation in the project (Wikipedia) space: you have 12 edits to VIP which isn't bad; however, you have hardly any participation in RfD, Simple...
Click to read more »tools will be helpful in patrolling WP:RC. I can also help in CAT:QD, WP:VIP and WP:RFD. I am generally around when I am awake so I can help in urgent...
Click to read more »granted admin tools, I’d use them mainly to patrol CAT:QD and deal with VIP reports. Candidate's acceptance: self-nomination Support This wiki needs...
Click to read more »@Some Gadget Geek: This page is not for reporting vandalism (please use WP:VIP for that) or requesting revdels. I have revdel'd this user's changes, but...
Click to read more »candidate has been too inactive for the past few weeks. I see not very many WP:VIP reports, which shows he doesn't need or has a use of the block tool. Needs...
Click to read more »be warned. If you see a long pattern of abuse, please just report it to VIP or AN, and administrator will review it. Not everyone reads warnings, and...
Click to read more »(less than 10 minutes for vandalism and attack pages), be able to clear VIP reports right after users are blocked (from my experience, it can take hours...
Click to read more »shows considered reasoning in his comments there. He also is very active at VIP where he reposts vandals and open proxies almost daily and in discussions...
Click to read more »warnings). Then June 2 before that. April 20 was your last report to WP:VIP. So, again, I think you'll do fine with the tools in deletion areas, I'd...
Click to read more »(talk) 04:16, 6 January 2025 (UTC) VIP reports - What criteria would you look for when blocking a user reported to VIP? I could translate my experiences...
Click to read more »reports at VIP, at Wikipedia talk:Bots#VIP Helper Bot. Any input would be appreciated, particularly from admins as it impacts how we would work on VIP. Thank...
Click to read more »pages in C:QD (and occasionally CAT:TWU), blocking users reported to WP:VIP and dealing with any protection requests and edit wars/content disputes are...
Click to read more »and I'm nominating RyanCross for adminship. I mean he reports a lot of WP:ViP alerts, he spends most of his time in the mainspace and he is a generous...
Click to read more »anything else. -- Auntof6 (talk) 02:54, 30 April 2023 (UTC) I reported them to VIP awhile back, but it appears it was archived before being completed. Can you...
Click to read more »haven't been here for long (just a month) and have a mere 25 QD requests and 3 VIP reports (unless I've missed some, in which case I apologise). I think this...
Click to read more »is a primary need for CheckUser blocks. They might be worth putting on WP:VIP or WP:ANI for other sysops to review the spammy username issue. The result...
Click to read more »he didn't warn the vandals. In addition, there aren't a track record to VIP/AN to judge if he will use the toolkit correctly. The community discussions...
Click to read more »them. Also, you do god reverting vandalism, but I don't see very many WP:VIP reports which means you wouldn't be using the block tool too often. Well...
Click to read more »to stop vandalism. For that purpose I would mainly be looking at QDs and VIP to help out there. However, I would also be happy to look at RfDs, impose...
Click to read more »Requests for deletion/Requests/2016/User:AdrianHernandez1/Draft:NBL VIP Requests for deletion/Requests/2016/User:AdrianHernandez1/Draft:Top Model...
Click to read more »over 150 valid QD tags, and has experience in anti-vandalism with several VIP reports. He has 57% of his edits to the mainspace, but also participates...
Click to read more »beginning of this year) he's made hundreds of good QD requests and many VIP requests, showing he still knows how to use the tools well and has a need...
Click to read more »spaces). Sometimes there is a lack of immediately active admins, either on VIP or AN (also it seems that a minority of admins do frequent RC patrolling)...
Click to read more »estimate this incident as possible block evasion and already reported to WP:VIP. MathXplore (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC) Done Deleted and protected...
Click to read more »reasonable amount of experience in anti-vandalism work and reporting to VIP; she just has a much larger amount of content work: 250 articles created...
Click to read more »MathXplore (talk) 08:56, 11 July 2023 (UTC) I removed those users on WP:VIP because they already have been blocked from changing. 95.134.111.155 (talk)...
Click to read more »deletion-needed articles. That's why I have so many deleted edits (mostly QDs) and VIP reports... And ChristianMan, you say "we are our own Wikipedia and everything...
Click to read more »candidates archives, the WP:VIP history, and much more to actually see what this user has done. I was impressed to see how many VIP reports that Razorflane...
Click to read more »vandalism, the normal warning process should be followed, with a report to VIP if necessary. Administrator involvement through AN is typically only needed...
Click to read more »Dylan620 Programming language: JavaScript Function: Bot for updating WP:VIP Description: Every 10 minutes, this bot processes Wikipedia:Vandalism in...
Click to read more »you have improved, but I still think you will delete things too quickly. ViP: Again, improvement, but I still think you think that a block is absolutely...
Click to read more »community in are helping the community block vandals that are listed on the WP:VIP, helping to close requests on the WP:RFD page and the biggest factor is that...
Click to read more »final warning, it can block the user from editing or report it to the WP:VIP/B page. When can I create the bot? Other questions, askin the "Comments"...
Click to read more »here on the Simple English Wikipedia too. I have also made reports to WP:VIP , I have throughly read and understand WP:RBK Thanks. Thegooduser Let's Chat...
Click to read more »that major. While you have been reverting vandalism, I didn't see very many ViP reports from you for the past couple of weeks (then again, I haven't had...
Click to read more »(talk) 02:38, 27 November 2025 (UTC) Report any new temporary account to WP:VIP. I will go through this discussions and blocks the ones here.--BRP ever 12:11...
Click to read more »after release from the previous block), and one day after it was reported to VIP. Vermont (talk) 02:52, 8 January 2020 (UTC) Okay. As I said, I'll ask a couple...
Click to read more »pursuing the FBI idea anymore, and I have practically ceased to use the WP:ViP page because there haven't been any IP's worth reporting lately. I believe...
Click to read more »normal warning process. And what would be 6? A VIP report? Normally you should not do only warnings or VIP reports first though. @Davey2010 Me Da Wikipedian...
Click to read more »to request the rollback feature (which administrators can grant). See WP:VIP to report vandalism. Add this page to your list of watched pages — Purge...
Click to read more »(koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:47, 25 March 2024 (UTC) Note:It's best to report the LTA at WP:VIP rather than WP:AN.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:50, 25 March...
Click to read more »marked and reported to VIP do not say anything about GRP they say VOA (vandalism only account). I know what his summaries say and the vip board is getting filled...
Click to read more »(UTC) I believe they could be the same user, I have reported the username to VIP but I want to run a check for this account, because I have noticed that they...
Click to read more »which under Normandy is to articles. I have reverted vandalism, referred to VIP, contributed to discussions on ST and ANI, assisted at DYK and helped write...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:11, 6 October 2021 (UTC) I just reported the account to stewards + VIP. Generally though, they get locked quicker than blocked because, we have...
Click to read more »a sustained history of involvement in anti-vandalism work; reporting to VIP, warning appropriately, identifying vandalism v. productive edits correctly...
Click to read more »see, you have little/no anti-vandalism experience here and the singular VIP request you made was declined. How do you plan to show you know how to revert...
Click to read more »need where little policy or guideline changes have occurred such as QD and VIP. The fact that multiple admins who work in those areas are supporting this...
Click to read more »would like to see more vandal reversions as well as more reports to the ViP page and warnings to the vandals that you reverted appropriately, as this...
Click to read more »has been going a bit crazy on the vandal side. They've been reported on VIP, but leaving this here in case it gets someone's attention faster. Apologies...
Click to read more »(content was: '[[from]] [[ciaran]]') 13:24, 8 Jun 2004 Angela deleted "Template:Vip" (testing) 07:45, 8 Jun 2004 Angela deleted "User talk:Angela (troll)" 07:46...
Click to read more »this in #2001:9e8:620:4800:614c:b763:f5d8:3ee0. Please report again on WP:VIP if you see a similar case of vandalism again. Thanks! --Ferien (talk) 19:34...
Click to read more »the matches with the other 3, I felt it better to post here rather than VIP since CUs have higher access. I also know they are both exiting through AU...
Click to read more »be placed, you may do so on WP:ANI or, if it's a vandalism problem, at WP:VIP Operator873talkconnect 06:45, 21 November 2018 (UTC) In case you want a second...
Click to read more »page isn't protected when there is only one vandal, but who do I report to VIP if I can't warn them on time? I can't. I hope you are having an amazing day...
Click to read more »who continue vandalizing after their final warnings can be reported at WP:VIP. Only (talk) 02:14, 22 December 2018 (UTC) @Only: When can I re-apply for...
Click to read more »growing!). Since my divineapi report I've skipped RfC and head straight to VIP and would welcome others to do the same as it's obvious it's collectively...
Click to read more »WP:VIP. Ternera (talk) 21:13, 5 April 2025 (UTC) Ok, Thanks. Durjan Singh Jadon (talk) 21:35, 5 April 2025 (UTC) I already reported this to WP:VIP, you...
Click to read more »NXcrypto Chatting 11:22, 5 March 2025 (UTC) Done and for future reference, WP:VIP would be a more appropriate place for an uncontroversial request like this...
Click to read more »warnings for the articles, and if they continue it, you can report them at WP:VIP so they admins can block them. Ternera (talk) 21:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »about it. If the warnings escalate to a final warning, please report at WP:VIP. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:07, 1 March 2025 (UTC) but I am from Hudhaifah...
Click to read more »December 2024 (UTC) (Non-administrator observation): please remember to use WP:VIP to report vandals in the future. Thank you! BZPN (talk) 22:23, 13 December...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Username. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 04:02, 30 March 2026 (UTC) Reported at WP:VIP. – Erakilos 𐤀 04:18, 30 March 2026 (UTC) Thanks! ExplorerofSpace (talk)...
Click to read more »Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 18:16, 14 October 2025 (UTC) I did it for VIP with twinkle Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 21:04, 15 October 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wales" vandal and the "Ghosts eat toast". Please report such edits to WP:VIP right away, and please ask for CU also. I've range blocked, but more will...
Click to read more »(talk) 03:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC) @BigKrow You want to report this to WP:VIP. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 03:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »level-4 warning (also called last or final warning), then report them at WP:VIP. -- Auntof6 (talk) 03:51, 30 June 2023 (UTC) !. It's conceited to start changing...
Click to read more »DYK has been one of the most active pages on the project even more so than VIP and AN. I think we should start updating it more often. I am purposing we...
Click to read more »user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Report originally from WP:VIP diff by Griffinofwales. Pmlineditor Talk 10:51, 29 August 2009 (UTC) Ricardojose20027...
Click to read more »I've reverted them and warned them, If they continue please report to WP:VIP, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:49, 16 July 2024 (UTC) Some of the heights they...
Click to read more »15:25, 20 October 2024 (UTC) Globally locked. Also, such requests go to WP:VIP- BRP ever 16:00, 20 October 2024 (UTC) Special:Diff/9790741, skip to the...
Click to read more »@Fr33kman BigKrow (talk) 01:00, 16 May 2025 (UTC) Best to report them on WP:VIP in the future. Thx fr33kman 01:13, 16 May 2025 (UTC) hey guys i am requesting...
Click to read more »2023 (UTC) (Note) Today I reported Special:Contributions/178.94.115.200 to VIP (same Internet provider, admin template creations as well as the IPs above)...
Click to read more »September 2025 (UTC) This edit needs a revdel and a user block (reported at VIP already). CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:18, 10 September 2025 (UTC) Both done...
Click to read more »create tons of bad pages, it's usually easier to request a nuke here or on VIP instead of QDing them individually. Thanks, --Ferien (talk) 19:50, 27 August...
Click to read more »obviously vandalism, often a checkuser is not necessary for a block. Report to VIP first, where most admins are likely to see first. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page...
Click to read more »ignore the user. Do not reply to them, do not engage with them, report to WP:VIP on sight, and ignore. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 05:51, 5 September 2024...
Click to read more »probably help to block them as a first start. I have reported them to WP:VIP. Ternera (talk) 18:02, 7 July 2025 (UTC) Pretty much going to say Not done...
Click to read more »RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) (today) See also these two WP:VIP posts: Special:Diff/9828686 and Special:Diff/9900061, and this WP:AN post...
Click to read more »DaneGeld (talk) 18:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC) @DaneGeld You can report at WP:VIP. Thank you! Aster🪻 talk edits 18:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC) Fwiw I don't...
Click to read more »hand in that area would be very helpful. We do need help in keeping up with VIP requests and responding to any urgent requests. BRP ever 17:16, 9 April 2025...
Click to read more »the IP's talk page (which was not done in this case), you can report at WP:VIP. -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC) @Auntof6 Alright my bad...
Click to read more »April 2024 (UTC) @Lee Vilenski You are on our EN:WP:HD board. Then we have VIP, RFCU and finally WP:AN. That pretty much covers what we have for about 50...
Click to read more »has already said. They are allowed to nominate pages for QD and report at VIP, so why can't they get involved in RfD? Sockpuppetry/block evasion issues...
Click to read more »This page can now be done with being protected. Because it's been protected for years but now it's done. 174.27.21.219 (talk) 02:50, 8 March 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »