Redirect to:
that pages can be deleted: Shortcuts WP:QDWP:QD WP:CSDWP:CSD WP:SPEEDYWP:SPEEDY Before deleting a page that meets one of the quick deletion criteria, administrators...
Click to read more »request for oversightship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it. Speedy Deletion (talk · contribs) End date: 12 March 2009 Because I want to delete...
Click to read more »speedy:true speedy-delete-summary:Quick deleted, $1. speedy-message-summary:Notification: Quick deletion of [[$1]] ([[WP:HG|HG]]) speedy-message-title:...
Click to read more »preferably speedily. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:38, 21 November 2013 (UTC) Speedy delete. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:54, 21 November 2013 (UTC) Speedy delete. Blatant...
Click to read more »have tagged it for speedy deletion. Anchorvale T@lk 08:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC) Definitely speedy deletion. Previously speedy deleted just a few hours...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross (talk) Probably can be speedied with absolutely no assertion of notability. Kansan (talk) 19:12, 9 April 2011 (UTC) Speedy Dee Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈...
Click to read more »as long as it is obvious, for example, if a nomination is eligible for speedy closure. Any editor in good standing is allowed to close check-usership...
Click to read more »there may be options that are not just "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy keep - while the IP did not simplify it themself, what's preventing us from...
Click to read more »others Jasperkinsely (talk) 04:31, 6 August 2026 (UTC) Change being made: A speedy deletion template R1 appear on on the top of That Time I Got Turned Into...
Click to read more »Delete. Due to article being a copypasta from external source, it has been speedy deleted. Thanks to EVula for noticing.-- Tdxiang 04:14, 19 January 2013...
Click to read more »appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Speedy closed as unsuccessful –Juliancolton | Talk 02:27, 7 December 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedily kept per consensus and due to the fact that reason for deletion is no longer...
Click to read more »the cat Category:Journalists and this cats aren't for the user namespace. Speedy per QD#C1. Barras (talk) 20:44, 27 February 2009 (UTC) Delete Razorflame...
Click to read more »has since been indef'ed and more then likely a bad faith create. With 2 speedy noms, I must concur that this should be closed early -- Enfcer (talk) 00:03...
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedy keep I just wikified it and simplified it. Easy fixes to make it match our requirements. Only (talk) 16:08, 6 December 2015 (UTC) Speedy keep...
Click to read more »Speedy delete per G11. Goblin 18:38, 11 January 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Yottie! Delete per nom. ♥ingly, Bella tête-à-tête 03:48, 14 January 2011 (UTC) Speedy delete...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedy kept per SNOW. --IWI (talk) 11:28, 5 March 2021 (UTC) 13 (edit · talk ·...
Click to read more »closed as delete. On English Wikipedia, this would be a speedy deletion as a recreation of a deleted article. I'm not familiar with Simple...
Click to read more »say why it's notable. Juliancolton (talk) 18:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete As above. - Æåm Fætsøn /ˈaɪæm ˈfætsən/ 09:14, 24 January 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy-deleted per CSD criterion G4 Non-admin close. StevenJ81 (talk) 17:44, 1...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) speedy delete why is this even being discussed? It's total nonsensical garbage. Praxidicae (talk) 18:16, 18 January 2020 (UTC) Speedy Delete as...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete under G4 - this has been deleted before as Mohammad Ghorbanpour and...
Click to read more »--Gordonrox24 | Talk 17:00, 30 January 2011 (UTC) Speedy Keep Albacore (talk · changes) 17:03, 30 January 2011 (UTC) Speedy closed. PeterSymonds (talk) 17:03, 30...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Non-admin close as speedy keep, the issues for deletion have been fixed, whilst it was a questionable...
Click to read more »reason: This was a speedy request but I am not comfortable speedying an article this well written. So I am moving it to RfD. The speedy rational was "does...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedy kept per nominator request, and per consensus. Pmlineditor ∞ 13:21, 8 February...
Click to read more »surprised it wasn't tagged as speedy, to be honest. EVula // talk // ☯ // 04:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC) Delete per nom. Prob. worth a speedy. Theo10011 (talk) 13:58...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedily. Chenzw Talk 02:55, 20 June 2013 (UTC) Template:Ma (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy deleted (A4) by Macdonald-ross –Davey2010Talk 13:08, 8 August 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedily deleted -Mh7kJ (talk) 15:46, 8 January 2014 (UTC) Talk:Battle of Saratoga...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy deleted as there was absolutely no assertion of notability. Kansan (talk)...
Click to read more »meeting GNG. (In my opinion this afd is not needed as Auntof6 doubtfully speedy deleted the article per A4.) SportsOlympic (talk) 07:53, 2 November 2024...
Click to read more »what is being stored in the Category. You can't clear categories and then speedy them, they need to be discussed. -DJSasso (talk) 01:37, 31 October 2017...
Click to read more »Delete - does not assert notability. Kansan (talk) 22:50, 12 May 2010 (UTC) Speedy delete - A1. Griffinofwales (talk) 22:51, 12 May 2010 (UTC) I considered...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Was a speedy but doesn't meet our speedy requirements. Here was what the nominator said. "created by...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedily deleted --Auntof6 (talk) 19:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC) Harry potter for beginners...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedy keep; please bring up concerns in talk page. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:54...
Click to read more »Speedy delete created by an xwiki sock/spammer. Chrissymad (talk) 15:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC) Yes, since I tagged it for QD in the first place, Speedy delete...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Snow close (aka speedy keep) The article was nominated while in a vandalized state, at which time...
Click to read more »--SEPTActaMTA8235 11:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC) Speedy as copyvio — μ 11:40, Monday April 18 2011 (UTC) Speedy copied stuff should be deleted as quickly as...
Click to read more »fr33kman t - c 14:12, 26 February 2009 (UTC) Delete under QDA11 rule for speedy deletion. Razorflame 15:04, 26 February 2009 (UTC) Delete per QD#A11 Barras...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy merge. this article must be speedy merged because 2D game is so famous. there are billions...
Click to read more »the speedy because it does make a claim in stating they won a talent show. It is of course a flimsy claim but a claim it is so not valid for speedy. So...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedied as housekeeping. Thanks, all. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:01, 27 October 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »pages. Instead of "External links", we use Other websites. Our criteria for speedy deletion (which we call quick deletion, or QD for short) are slightly different...
Click to read more »suit speedy deletion criterion A3, copy from another Wikipedia with little sign of simplification. Or, under one interpretation of G12, it's a speedy delete...
Click to read more »Sabri (musician), which in turn was deleted via RFD, therefore I have speedied this one. Chenzw Talk 12:45, 4 February 2020 (UTC) Ali Sabri (singer)...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Speedy Delete even since it's a word-for-word copy from an enwiki user space draft...
Click to read more »SPEEDY. Snackmurat (talk) 22:59, 31 October 2021 (UTC) see Ricardo Alexander Neeley. Snackmurat (talk) 10:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC) We can't SPEEDY pages...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedy keep because the statement is incoherent and there's absolutely nothing...
Click to read more »marked for speedy deletion, as long as it already exists on Wiktionary. --Hydriz (talk) 14:55, 2 February 2014 (UTC) Hydriz, our equivalent to speedy deletion...
Click to read more »been a good candidate for 'speedy'. Quakewoody (talk) 19:14, 22 July 2020 (UTC) Delete No notability. Per Quakewoody, speedy deletion would've been better...
Click to read more »Speedy deletion tag was reverted by Bureaucrat. An element at least of notability. User:TheRealThing2016 (chat) 17:04, 29 July 2020 (UTC) The speedy deletion...
Click to read more »movies are getting old. TheAE talk 21:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC) Delete Speedy delete per A2. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 21:05, 28 February 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedily delete - non-notable, WP:OR and our tropical storms 'expert' said it wasn't...
Click to read more »at about the same time; June 2008 and referenced from this article, was speedy deleted as vandalism. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) I have restored it for the discussion as it was not a valid speedy as it claimed she was going to be in a film for a major film franchise (albeit...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Informing ImprovedWikiImprovment who speedy it as A1 and Auntof6 who declined I took it to here.--Cohaf (talk) 07:25...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Closed speedily per my comment. I may have a slight COI for voting, but tbh this is a problem...
Click to read more »given for deleting the page. Jared837 (talk) 15:00, 24 October 2018 (UTC) Speedy keep per Jared. Hiàn (talk/editing on mobile account.) 15:24, 24 October...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy Keep - Being unsourced isn't a valid reason for deletion. Clearly WP:BEFORE...
Click to read more »be made to this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was speedy deleted by Albacore (talk · contribs) per G12 (copyvio). Goodvac (talk)...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedied by Macdonald-ross. Chenzw Talk 14:04, 23 July 2020 (UTC) Sar faraz khan...
Click to read more »there may be options that are not just "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete: Could have been deleted any number of ways, including being poorly...
Click to read more »2010 at 8:56 pm, although it may be closed more quickly due to WP:SNOW. Speedy close indication that the nominator is possibly making a WP:POINT, announcements...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedily deleted under G3. --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 17:59...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedied per A6 criteria of the quick deletion policy. Most of these Bambifan pages...
Click to read more »against some reddit user. This should be speedy close. --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:02, 18 January 2020 (UTC) Speedy Delete as an attack page. Zaxxon0 (talk)...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedily deleted by Barras as QD G12. NotImportant 17:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Rochester...
Click to read more »proper sourcing and neutral tone.Pot2156 (talk) 08:30, 5 February 2025 (UTC) Speedy delete: what is this article notable for? And why is only Nigerian media...
Click to read more »obvious reasons. Chrissymad (talk) 16:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC) Oppose and speedy close--Crasstun (talk | contributions) 16:14, 24 June 2017 (UTC) Oppose:...
Click to read more »Griffinofwales (talk) 22:56, 10 April 2010 (UTC) Speedy keep per 'erybud Purplebackpack89 00:06, 11 April 2010 (UTC) Speedy keep per excellent changes by Arbitrarily...
Click to read more »Delete is really an obivousy speedy deletion article.--Sinbad (talk) 13:23, 4 March 2010 (UTC) Er... if it was a speedy deletion candidate, I would have...
Click to read more »discussion. Speedy deleted as a hoax. Didn't notice there was an rfd tag on the page but in researching if it was a hoax I agreed so speedied it. -DJSasso...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedily deleted per A1, page has little or no meaning. Malinaccier (talk) 17:35...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Delete. The result of this discussion was speedy delete per WP:SNOW, for violation of anti-spam and advertising rule.-- Tdxiang...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete this one per nom. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 18:39, 13 August 2010 (UTC) Speedy delete per obvious reasons.--Sinbad...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedied per A4. Not notable. Pmlineditor ∞ 15:29, 10 December 2009 (UTC) Anjali...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedy close as keep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterdownunder (talk...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. speedy deleted since user blanked the page -- Enfcer (talk) 22:32, 3 October 2017...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I tagged this userpage for speedy deletion, which was declined, but I’m not convinced the user ever intended...
Click to read more »"This is a joke, right?" Vermont | reply here 20:05, 1 March 2018 (UTC) Speedy close: We wouldn't give this user even patroller or rollbacker right now...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:29, 13 December 2015 (UTC) Restore redirect and then Speedy close. Prior to this past October, this title was a redirect to PBS Kids#Sprout...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy Keep - No valid reason for deletion - I'm all for deleting socks-works but...
Click to read more »media". Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:55, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Comment Was speedy deleted after this Rfd was created by Macdonald-ross. I have restored it...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Speedily per nom Normandie Talk! 16:37, 11 January 2011 (UTC) Speedy delete per nom. Goblin 18:35, 11 January...
Click to read more »much, game DOES NOT exist --24.0.138.63 (talk) 01:12, 12 August 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete. Article does not exist. - A Link to the Past (talk) 02:07, 12 August...
Click to read more »article needs improving. Minkythecat (talk) 13:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC) Speedy Keep Being the founder of a major international company is, in my opinion...
Click to read more »to this. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. – was speedy deleted by Majorly, and I agree. TheAE talk 05:28, 6 February 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedy close: User doesn't even meet standards for patroller or rollbacker right now. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:18, 1 March 2018 (UTC) Speedy close per...
Click to read more »appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Speedy Deleted -Djsasso (talk) 15:56, 1 February 2021 (UTC) Roomball (edit · talk...
Click to read more »already Template:Talkback Kennedy (talk) 08:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC) Speedy close - redirecting to Talkback. Nanochip08 Microchip08 onWHEELS This request...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedy keep. The category is essential for the wiki and is not related to the length...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. This should have been speedy deleted as an obvious spambot page. --Rschen7754 05:39, 19 July 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »there may be options that are not just "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete per QD A1 and A4. —Classical Esthertalk 08:18, 30 April 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. clearly this is speedy deletable fr33kman 15:04, 29 May 2011 (UTC) Newland (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy close as QD, did not meet notability criteria Peterdownunder (talk) 22:15...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedily kept as bad faith deletion nomination with no valid reason cited. Pmlineditor...
Click to read more »2019 (UTC) Speedy Delete Cross-wiki spam. --AshokChakra (talk) 18:17, 26 July 2019 (UTC) DeleteLet's don't waste any more time, shall we, speedy as G11?--Cohaf...
Click to read more »that he fails hard at even the most basic requirements to become a sysop, speedy close, please. - A Link to the Past (talk) 05:20, 14 August 2008 (UTC) Can...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy Delete per A1. -DJSasso (talk) 11:49, 20 September 2013 (UTC) Fremont nebraska...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy deleted by me as an exact re-creation of Ali Qassim, an article deleted...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy close The article was QD under A5 for not being in English. Etamni | ✉ | ✓ ...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy close as not notable spam article Peterdownunder (talk) 10:59, 20 March...
Click to read more »{{sofixit}} I will have a look later...) BG7even 09:06, 20 January 2009 (UTC) Speedily Delete under A4 - not notable (Sorry I didn't notice it on my first pass ;)...
Click to read more »appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Speedy deleted -Djsasso (talk) 16:00, 5 August 2021 (UTC) User:Icem4k/2019–20 Premier...
Click to read more »tagged this page for speedy deletion and can find nothing substantial on Google et al. Lauryn Ashby (d) 21:32, 24 January 2010 (UTC) Speedy D: Several different...
Click to read more »has been confirmed. Interstatefive (talk) 02:21, 9 December 2024 (UTC) Speedy delete While Syrian Air Flight 9218's status was unknown yesterday, whether...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable singer. Speedy deleted from bnwiki 4 times, see bn:আরিয়ান মেহেদী. Even draft was deleted...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy deleted per A9@enwiki. PeterSymonds (talk) 17:12, 21 August 2010 (UTC) Hard...
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedy Delete Ferien This page has been deleted four times under this name[1] & 3 times here[2] but also we are here, I request for speedy deletion...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete Speedy redirect. -DJSasso (talk) 19:48, 27 January 2010 (UTC). Sims 3 (change ·...
Click to read more »situations like this I also don't believe an admin should be deleting their own speedies. I must say I am very disappointed in Synergy who its becoming more clear...
Click to read more »appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Speedy Deleted -Djsasso (talk) 15:28, 10 September 2020 (UTC) Jeff Newitt (edit...
Click to read more »my 'nom' Kennedy (talk • changes). (I ♥ BG7) 11:39, 15 July 2009 (UTC) Speedy per QD#A4 - not notable. Barras (talk) 12:21, 15 July 2009 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »to seek verifiability rather than delete clearly notable stubs under a speedy criterion. I am curious why the community saved Tam but is happy to delete...
Click to read more »that are not just "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep (possibly speedy) obviously notable. Please improve rather than RfD'ing it. This is quite...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy due to long term abuse as spam. Been dealing with this editor cross-wiki...
Click to read more »this user. Psl85 Talk 18:33, 7 March 2018 (UTC) Candidate's acceptance: Speedy close. I'll reiterate what I said last time; "This is a joke, right?". WP:SNOW...
Click to read more »his initials was offered for purchase).” I think this can qualify for a speedy as promotional. The other articles also all say the same thing with a couple...
Click to read more »credible claim of significance, which automatically disqualifies it from speedy deletion under those criteria. Criterion A7 applies only when an article...
Click to read more »Blockinblox on Simple English Wikipedia speedy deleted at least two articles that did not appear to be speedy deletion candidates. The two articles are...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedily deleted under WP:QD#A1. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:25, 1 September 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »much sense out of this article. Kansan (talk) 06:18, 8 March 2011 (UTC) Speedy delete as a hoax. Since there are absolutely no search results that do not...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy close already deleted using QD process. Etamni | ✉ | ✓ 18:36, 20 January...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete: A deletion discussion for this is just waste of time. ‐‐1997kB (talk)...
Click to read more »there may be options that are not just "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy Keep - This article is entirely notable. I've also cleaned-up the article...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy close as not notable. Peterdownunder (talk) 22:26, 6 December 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Now -- Enfcer (talk) 22:13, 6 April 2019 (UTC) Candidate's acceptance: Speedy close. No nom statement, little/no experience. WP:SNOW applies. Hiàn (talk)...
Click to read more »appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Speedy deleted per deletion policy. Griff (talk) 20:11, 26 February 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy close as previously deleted Peterdownunder (talk) 09:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy Delete as just spam. --Gotanda (talk) 22:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete - likely hoax, article provides no context (including the location...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedily delete per Has no content. This includes any article consisting only of...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedily delete per Has no content. This includes any article consisting only of...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy close as hoax Peterdownunder (talk) 11:19, 9 June 2021 (UTC) Purl Round...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy keep: Three links are no longer red. A brilliant example of {{sofixit}}...
Click to read more »appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Speedy deleted as recreation of a page that has been recreated many times at many...
Click to read more »due to WP:SNOW. Delete, this was speedy deleted yesterday. Griffinofwales (talk) 01:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete as a blatant hoax. – Katerenka...
Click to read more »Non-notable person. —Mythdon [talk] [changes] 19:03, 22 December 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete - per QD A4 if it applies use it, that it IMO.-- † CR90 19:08,...
Click to read more »Delete: Unused template. Lugia2453 (talk) 01:06, 15 September 2013 (UTC) Speedy Delete - QD under T2 (unused template) or G6 (housekeeping). Goblin 01:02...
Click to read more »Delete per nom and aboves.--Grind24 (talk) 14:54, 10 December 2015 (UTC) Speedy delete as advertisement, probable conflict of interest, and not notable...
Click to read more »its non-Simple categories. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC) Speedy delete per my same vote on a related article. Created by a now locked xwiki...
Click to read more »merging. Delete per nom. AJona1992 (talk) 03:54, 13 September 2011 (UTC) Speedily delete per Has no content. This includes any article consisting only of...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Delete. There wasn't a need for an RfD, it was speedy applicable. Its been taken care of now. Synergy 00:27, 18 November 2008...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy close as promotional spam Peterdownunder (talk) 22:22, 30 April 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy deleted as a recreation of Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/Alex...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. delete I agree.-BRP ever 09:54, 21 March 2018 (UTC) Speedy keep as a clearly notable topic. I cleaned up the article, sourced, wikify...
Click to read more »আফতাবুজ্জামান has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Speedy deleted from bnwiki and draft also rejected on enwiki. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk)...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Not sure if that could even be a candidate for speedy deletion. However, it doesn't seem to be notable. Barras talk 18:03, 18...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy close as we are not a webhost Peterdownunder (talk) 10:50, 23 March 2021...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete per author request. I don't feel like going through RfD. The way...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete as hoax, cannot find any sources that suggest its existance. --George...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy delete as clearly not notable Peterdownunder (talk) 12:50, 16 April 2021...
Click to read more »there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep Speedy Keep as a national anthem should be kept. Needs a translation and simplification...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete under G4, was already RFD'ed not too long ago:...
Click to read more »merging. Ditto: as below. Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:24, 27 August 2018 (UTC) Speedy Keep Operator873talkconnect 16:00, 27 August 2018 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »Times Atlas of the World. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:20, 6 August 2018 (UTC) Speedy Delete as hoax. Operator873talkconnect 21:03, 8 August 2018 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »for what A4 ought to be used for. Hiàn (talk) 15:31, 3 April 2020 (UTC) Speedy delete why is this at rfd? It's a clear cut example of a4. Praxidicae (talk)...
Click to read more »appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Speedy Deleted -Djsasso (talk) 15:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC) Reza Homaminia (edit...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete (speedy) - Plot summary is a copy of [1], and the article here appears to be at...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy deleted as a copy vio. Didn't need to go to Rfd. Can be recreated if someone...
Click to read more »concept, the page is about the word, which appears to be a neologism. Was speedied on the English Wikipedia, but it didn't really match any of our criteria...
Click to read more »them here one at a time. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:02, 13 September 2011 (UTC) Speedily delete per Has no content. This includes any article consisting only of...
Click to read more »appropriate discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion. Speedied by G4. -DJSasso (talk) 15:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC) José Rafael Cordero (edit...
Click to read more »it passed a recent RfD and it is too soon to renominate. I'd suggest a speedy close of this one until this has had enough time to settle down a bit. Blissyu2...
Click to read more »insignificant. Keep & source per others. TheAE talk 01:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete as A4. Razorflame 18:38, 27 March 2009 (UTC) Keep per the evidence...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy close as hoax Peterdownunder (talk) 11:15, 9 June 2021 (UTC) Pigman (edit...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete - Tagged as A6 (hoax). –Davey2010Talk 17:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedy kept: Do not nominate other users' user pages for deletion. --Auntof6 (talk)...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:16, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Comment: The same article on EN has been speedy deleted for advertising. Chenzw Talk 02:47, 18 June 2009 (UTC) The outcome...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete (G2) - Tagged as such as page is generally a useless mess. –Davey2010Talk...
Click to read more »are not just "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete I've tagged for speedy deletion for A1, little or no meaning. Albacore (talk) 00:32, 16 November...
Click to read more »Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I'm inclined to speedy the page. No source. Would in doubt better fit for Wiktionary. Don't see...
Click to read more »of this request for deletion was to Delete. Fr33kman (talk · contribs) speedy deleted the article for a lack of notability, so I'll simply blizzard this...
Click to read more »company, better off deleted. –Davey2010Talk 23:47, 18 December 2017 (UTC) Speedy delete - Reading the lede it is indeed vandalism - Again no point redirecting...
Click to read more »the reason: The nominator's reason for doing this is: This article was speedily deleted several times as a hoax/promo on enwiki today. The notability claim...
Click to read more »en:wp and the reference given. --Creol(talk) 18:10, 25 January 2013 (UTC) Speedy keep no reasons to discuss this further I think. Thanks Creol for your work...
Click to read more »company, no track record. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC) speedy delete more crosswiki hoax bullshit from MD Anan Islam. Praxidicae (talk)...
Click to read more »other language wikis have been deleted for lack of notability as well. Speedy deletion was declined by IP address editor. –Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 04:30,...
Click to read more »mentioned by the nominator have been addressed, I see no reason to not speedy keep this. ~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 14:55, 11 November 2021 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »serial commas. :) Cheers, NonvocalScream (talk) 04:00, 8 June 2009 (UTC) Speedy Keep per all. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 08:32, 8 June 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedily deleted as having no content (articles need more than just an infobox)...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete This is straight up promotional garbage. Praxidicae (talk) 15:27...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy close as non notable Peterdownunder (talk) 22:26, 30 April 2021 (UTC) Krystal...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy deleted by Macdonald-ross as vandalism & disruptive creation. Griff (talk)...
Click to read more »— Preceding unsigned comment added by MrRajRumel (talk • contribs) Delete Speedy please. Cross-wiki spam. NahidSultan (talk) 08:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete. A college group self-promoting on YouTube. Macdonald-ross (talk)...
Click to read more »Peterdownunder (talk) 07:55, 29 April 2021 (UTC) This page should not be speedily deleted because... it is a genuine page that I personally created. I researched...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedily closing, clearly inappropriate request. Mh7kJ (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2013...
Click to read more »less agree with speedy deleting such articles, as Tygrrr said on his talk page. Here is what I suggest as a new criterion for speedy deletion: An article...
Click to read more »appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Speedy moved Delete discussion not required for a technical move. Just ask an admin...
Click to read more »there may be options that are not just "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete per Bull Fighting and WP:QD#A3. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 21:51, 3 August...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete as it was created by a blocked/banned contributor, see w:en:WP:LTA/Alec...
Click to read more »not copy articles from the English Wikipedia. UPDATE: I nominated it for speedy deletion. – TG-ARTICLE (talk) 17:00, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy Delete for blatant copyright violation: http://www.bmj.com/content/286/6378/1658...
Click to read more »appropriate discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion. Speedy Deleted as hoaxes. -DJSasso (talk) 11:52, 22 April 2014 (UTC) CD Lucas (edit...
Click to read more »appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Speedy deleted -Djsasso (talk) 19:19, 28 August 2020 (UTC) WordPerfect (edit ·...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy Delete - If the template is unused and only contains redlinks, there's little...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC) Sounds like it should have been a speedy delete. I wasn't aware of the previous deletion. Blissyu2 (talk) 12:16,...
Click to read more »also an option. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC) Delete Speedy. Copyvio from https://www.apm.org.uk/resources/what-is-project-manageme...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Quick delete nonsense article speedy for now because qd a5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by...
Click to read more »(edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request Speedy Deletion A4 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Amdin Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »— Preceding unsigned comment added by Samlaptop85213 (talk • contribs) Speedy delete already. - Æåm Fætsøn /ˈaɪæm ˈfætsən/ 09:14, 24 January 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. met speedy deletion criteria. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:44, 29 October 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »and he's also in this article --Ferien (talk) 16:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC) Speedy Keep - Yes, it would be better if the article has more citations. The subject...
Click to read more »realised that a similarly titled article on enwiki by the same user was speedy deleted as a blatant hoax. That user was also blocked indefinitely as per...
Click to read more »December 2017 (UTC) Delete--Eptalon (talk) 23:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC) Speedy Delete. Obvious QD candidate as a hoax. Lithorien Talk • Changes 04:39,...
Click to read more »contribute more for this open source Self-nomination Oppose, and moving for a speedy close per WP:NOTNOW. I wish to point out further that you have only made...
Click to read more »suit speedy deletion criterion A3, copy from another Wikipedia with little sign of simplification. Or, under one interpretation of G12, it's a speedy delete...
Click to read more »but one should note that many of my edits have been speedy deleted after I have posted speedy tags on articles. In addition, I feel I should mention...
Click to read more »sources that show notability. --Belwine (talk) 16:18, 4 April 2021 (UTC) Speedy delete - non-notable subject. Cross-wiki sockpuppetry and self promotion...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete And, I'd say speedy at that as a hoax. There is no such thing as a national variant. --Gotanda...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy deleted per author request Griffinofwales (talk) 18:10, 1 February 2010...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Clear consensus for a speedy close Peterdownunder (talk) 22:29, 20 April 2022 (UTC) Elijah Xenakis (edit...
Click to read more »the reason: Non-notable, original research and contributor has removed speedy. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete A09 (talk) 12:58, 19 June 2024 (UTC) I requested it be Quickly Deleted...
Click to read more »probably qualifies as a QD --Peterdownunder (talk) 09:39, 3 April 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete bad tone too. - Æåm Fætsøn /ˈaɪæm ˈfætsən/ 09:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy deleted - A3. Griff (talk) 00:56, 28 January 2025 (UTC) Biddy Basketball...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete per nom, non notable, zero WP:SIGCOV. see also en:Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »request. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC) Delete And, I'd say speedy at that as a hoax. There is no such thing as a national variant. --Gotanda...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Delete and being created crosswiki; maybe it qualifies for speedy? Billinghurst (talk) 02:38, 23 October 2020 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »requirement, its a rule of thumb. -Djsasso (talk) 15:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC) SPEEDY KEEP as nom may not have understood requirements for a deletion. Clearly...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy keep Source region is a significant concept in meteorology. I have cleaned...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete as a blatant hoax. This article was created by 71.29.215.87 (talk ·...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Not relevant on simplewiki; based on enwiki speedy deletion process. Unused. Batrachoseps (talk) 19:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete I was just about to speedy it. -Barras talk 23:11, 17 March 2026 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »link posted on this page and it is clear vandalism. Can you tag this for speedy deletion is that exists on Simple? Liz (talk) 03:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. speedy delete this is an xwiki hoax by an xwiki troll Praxidicae (talk) 18:43,...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy close per author's request Peterdownunder (talk) 20:32, 28 January 2026...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy delete for a possible future film. Let's wait at least till it is made....
Click to read more »2009 at 2:49 am, although it may be closed more quickly due to WP:SNOW. Speedy delete as no useable context. Razorflame 04:09, 14 October 2009 (UTC) Quick...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy close as test page which made little sense Peterdownunder (talk) 09:32,...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Quick delete Not notable. Speedy delete. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 21:42, 1 July 2025 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »of Germany is not needed anymore Rimshot 13:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Speedy Keep. Leave as a redirect. I don't see how this is misleading..--Werdan7T...
Click to read more »Created by a globally blocked account. Was put up for speedy as not a webhost. However that is not a speedy reason. So I have Rfd'd it. Not necessarily sure...
Click to read more »it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Znotch190711 (talk • contribs) Speedy Keep as a clearly notable film. Please read WP:BEFORE before you nominate...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy Keep - There's an article at EN (New Zealand's Top 100 History Makers) which...
Click to read more »there may be options that are not just "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete (A1): It's nonsense if it's not a hoax Purplebackpack89 05:21, 26...
Click to read more »MacFayden should go.--Peterdownunder (talk) 07:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete per QD:A4 as non-notable. Definitely is not notable; doesn't meet...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy Keep: Page can be improved upon, and this is something that should definitely...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Speedy Delete as spam and advertising. Blissyu2 (talk) 15:09, 26 September 2021...
Click to read more »presents as an attack piece or hostile journalism can be nominated for speedy deletion and will be removed promptly from the site. Those who post here...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy delete as a hoax Peterdownunder (talk) 21:01, 6 December 2023 (UTC) Artificial...
Click to read more »not copy articles from the English Wikipedia. UPDATE: I nominated it for speedy deletion. – TG-ARTICLE (talk) 16:32, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy Close This article is notable and does not need to be deleted at all. There...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete: This article qualify for Speedy deletion per G11. Fankuru (talk) 16:56, 6 November 2025 (UTC) Fankuru, where...
Click to read more »July 2009 (UTC) The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedy closed per consensus above and snow. Barras (talk) 14:33, 7 July 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(talk) 16:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC) Thanks for the tip. I've tagged it for speedy deletion. Ternera (talk) 16:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »used one? Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 12:18, 22 February 2009 (UTC) Speedy redirect? Chenzw Talk 12:39, 22 February 2009 (UTC) Just redirect it....
Click to read more »or "delete", such as merging. Delete clearly lacks WP:GNG, i propose, speedy deletion instead 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 11:16, 21 July 2026 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy deletion i think A4 is more appropriate here 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 11:20...
Click to read more »with nonsense. Modern primat (talk) 21:38, 15 December 2024 (UTC) can be speedy deleted. Modern primat (talk) 21:38, 15 December 2024 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »normally the whole point of making a merge in the first place. Someone speedy close this... Goblin 16:01, 29 March 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Pmlineditor! This request...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete - I can't find any references to this anywhere so it's not even at...
Click to read more »mere dictionary definition. Chenzw Talk 11:48, 8 December 2019 (UTC) Speedy Keep Page is stone-etched, and nomination reason invalid. Computer Fizz...
Click to read more »Arshifakhan61. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:39, 13 October 2020 (UTC) should be a speedy delete. Quakewoody (talk) 18:20, 14 October 2020 (UTC) @Quakewoody: Under...
Click to read more »appropriate discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion. Speedy Deleted per Pakistan Celebrations request. -DJSasso (talk) 15:27, 10 February...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:55, 7 October 2010 (UTC) Deleted Come on, this nonsense should be speedy deleted. We don't need to spend time talking about it. Rubbish gets canned...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy deleted by The Rambling Man Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 20:24, 12 May 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Not notable, speedy close--Peterdownunder (talk) 05:43, 6 January 2020 (UTC) Vikram Sachora...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. speedy deleted (A6) by Eptalon –Davey2010Talk 20:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC) Lizzie...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete per G4 - See Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Kefas...
Click to read more »I'm aware there's no applicable QD hence this RFD but if anyone wants to speedy delete I'd have no objections, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 01:33, 27 February...
Click to read more »in the slightest. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 16:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC) Speedy Delete Here we are, though the article should have gone with QD, self-promotion...
Click to read more »(UTC) And just as I say that I find it. Category:WikiProjects. Going to speedy delete as a duplicate. -DJSasso (talk) 14:26, 9 December 2011 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete (G5) as created by a sock, Please also see the log to Zero Defend...
Click to read more »2009 at 7:48 pm, although it may be closed more quickly due to WP:SNOW. Speedy delete unless expanded to show notability. Article doesn't claim notability...
Click to read more »there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Vote speedy deletion -- cross wiki spam. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:31, 17 February 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »17:46, 29 November 2011 (UTC) Gone non-notable so qualified immediately for speedy deletion. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:46, 30 November 2011 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedily deleted as advertising Chenzw Talk 00:51, 12 September 2011 (UTC) Alhaji...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Clear consensus for a speedy deletion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterdownunder (talk • contribs)...
Click to read more »SHB2000 (talk) 22:51, 20 September 2021 (UTC) Keep as clearly notable. Speedy Keep as bad faith nom. Has an English Wikipedia article [1] and a Bangladesh...
Click to read more »such as merging. I tagged this QDA4 but the original editor removed that. Speedy delete please. --Gotanda (talk) 04:57, 31 May 2022 (UTC) Delete - no real...
Click to read more »Only. Not much more to say. -DJSasso (talk) 18:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC) Speedy Keep. See WP:MOVIE. And see en:WP:NOENG. StevenJ81 (talk) 21:00, 16 January...
Click to read more »quicker due to this. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. I have speedied it under G11. cassandra (talk) 04:29, 2 September 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedy keep as problem has been fixed and nom has withdrawn. EhJJTALK 04:39, 21...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy close as not showing notability. --Peterdownunder (talk) 06:26, 30 August...
Click to read more »nom. SHB2000 (talk) 00:00, 25 September 2021 (UTC) wait no, this meets speedy deletion as this has been deleted under Wikipedia:Requests for...
Click to read more »article much better. Darubrub (Let me know) 00:56, 16 August 2021 (UTC) Speedy delete This was created by someone who made legal threats and this makes...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. @Djsasso: Both of these articles may be speedy deleted as G4 and/or articles/hoaxes created by an LTA (JRS). (Courtesy...
Click to read more »in English" isn't it? We have so many RfDs up at the moment. Let's use speedy when we can. --Gotanda (talk) 03:14, 16 November 2021 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »Wikivoyage commenting here, but if this were ever imported to voy, I'd speedy it as individual beaches don't get their own article on Wikivoyage per wiaa...
Click to read more »21:44, 25 January 2021 (UTC) Delete as per above. not notable at all. speedy delete. --MaksRom (talk) 12:08, 26 January 2021 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy Delete - No reliable source available to confirm notablity, except for some...
Click to read more »Chakraborty for more information). Hiàn (talk) 15:19, 6 April 2019 (UTC) Speedy delete: LTA. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 16:19, 6 April 2019 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete, salt and block. This seems to be part of the abuse documented at...
Click to read more »looks like spam to me. -Examknowtalk 14:19, 28 April 2020 (UTC) should be a Speedy Delete Quakewoody (talk) 17:10, 28 April 2020 (UTC) Delete 900K subscribers...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy close, as article is clearly a pesronal opinion, and possible copyright...
Click to read more »can just delete it in that case. IWI (chat) 16:44, 17 January 2019 (UTC) Speedy delete A1/A4.--Cohaf (talk) 17:06, 17 January 2019 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »be used as a valid deletion reason, this should have been QD'd under A4. Speedy delete. Goblin 02:14, 7 September 2013 (UTC) I ♥ Chenzw! Delete. COI & not...
Click to read more »(UTC) Not notable, delete. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:40, 10 July 2018 (UTC) Speedy delete as cross-wiki spam. T Cells (talk) 06:29, 11 July 2018 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »[16], [17], [18], [19], [20] .... --Dezidor 21:44, 20 August 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete small and unimportant wiki. Article obviously spam. --Isis§(talk)...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy Deleted due to copyright issues. -DJSasso (talk) 21:23, 8 June 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. by speedy of recreation of page deleted at Afd. -DJSasso (talk) 19:44, 16 January...
Click to read more »2009 at 4:21 am, although it may be closed more quickly due to WP:SNOW. Speedy delete per JC's reason and what I've heard on Meta. Griffinofwales (talk)...
Click to read more »category of lists or something? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:04, 31 May 2005 (UTC) Speedy deleted, since it was empty. -- Netoholic @ 14:38, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC) List...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete This is crosswiki vandalism and a hoax. Praxidicae (talk) 14:25,...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete test page 微甜微酸微苦__微鹹 (talk) 17:07, 27 January 2025 (UTC) Speedy delete for WP:G11. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 18:31, 1 February...
Click to read more »there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Quick Speedy Delete - Tagged as A3 as has been copy-pasted from Enwiki without any changes...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:08, 29 October 2024 (UTC) Post close comment; Just noting I had speedy tagged it as G5 due to the first creator being a globally locked sock. Thanks...
Click to read more »website. It has been deleted multiple & multiple times from enwiki. Should be speedy deleted. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the lack of sources, lack of specific information and nothing on enwiki. Speedy decllined, AFD created. Ravensfire (talk) 21:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »notability. Regards, Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 05:37, 19 March 2011 (UTC) Speedy keep in light of changes made. Kansan (talk) 06:21, 19 March 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Closed per this and speedily deleted as advertising. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 05:40, 19 March 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »added by Derpdart56 (talk • contribs) 12:58, 16 March 2021 (UTC) Endorse speedy deletion per Belwine - No need for a 7 day discussion over a CSD'able article...
Click to read more »protected on enwiki due to it being repeatedly created. rollingbarrels (talk) speedy delete and salt. Ali Sabri might be a real living person but the whole thing...
Click to read more »deletion. This one seemed obvious to me, and may even be suitable for a speedy deletion. Please let me know if I made a mistake with this. Blissyu2 (talk)...
Click to read more »in my RFD. Etoza (?) 18:09, 8 June 2021 (UTC) Quick delete Obvious hoax. Speedy deletion under A6 would work best. Animalguy7 (talk) 18:14, 8 June 2021...
Click to read more »get any votes at Rfd last time so it was only a soft delete so can't be speedy deleted as a recreation. So going to put this up again because I don't see...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC) @Fr33kman: Can you close this as speedy, because non-admin closures aren't allowed anymore. 2603:3005:902:5E00:C0B:E77A:260A:EAB3...
Click to read more »Delete. Clear case of CV.Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC) Speedy delete per G11. Goblin 18:38, 11 January 2011 (UTC) I ♥ PeterSymonds! Delete...
Click to read more »or "delete", such as merging. Actually forget that, this is eligible for speedy deletion (G4) as this is a recreation of a deleted page SHB2000 (talk) 07:45...
Click to read more »--2601:402:4400:3A90:58B8:D3A:4B3:CA51 (talk) 23:47, 11 November 2024 (UTC) Keep - Speedy Keep as another blind nomination by this editor. BEBOLD and SOFIXIT apply...
Click to read more »request Djsasso has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Declined speedy that doesn't seem to meet notability. Djsasso (talk) 15:35, 11 June 2021...
Click to read more »review BEFORE before nominating articles for deletion. This RFD could be speedy declined for that reason, and it takes RFD reviewers much longer to complete...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy delete for not meeting notability guideline for music Peterdownunder (talk)...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy deleted per QD G11 (or QD A4). Chenzw Talk 14:30, 29 December 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »July 2023 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG. Page was also made on the enwiki and speedy deleted recently by the same editor as well. en:A. Kaliyamurthy Bobherry...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy keep Looks like a test to me. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:09, 7 July 2014...
Click to read more »appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Speedy Deleted -Djsasso (talk) 17:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC) Gloob (edit · talk...
Click to read more »reason: Fails Wikipedia Notability guidelines, Might be A1 But i want a non speedy to be sure if this should stay, merge or deleted Milanjan10 (talk) 07:42...
Click to read more »It was created to be used on a page (and other future pages) that was speedy deleted but has since been restored. -DJSasso (talk) 17:31, 13 May 2019...
Click to read more »Voceditenore (talk) 17:16, 20 September 2018 (UTC) Delete, and is a candidate for speedy delete to stifle its ad effect. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:30, 21 September...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Clear cut case of speedy deletion under A4 if you ask me... Goblin 02:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC) I...
Click to read more »Paid-for spam about a non-notable person supported by black hat SEO sources. Speedy deleted on en.wp. MER-C (talk) 16:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedy keep. Since the community has already participated in that RfA, it is already...
Click to read more »^-^ 06:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC) Speedy delete when I nominated it for A4, the Arabic page did exist, but it has been speedied. I think I know a lot more than...
Click to read more »need to keep this article. —§ stay (sic)! 10:03, 27 February 2010 (UTC) Speedy Keep per Kansan, and the fact the article says that he's the first openly...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. by Speedy. User page where the user themself voted delete. -DJSasso (talk) 13:19,...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Speedy Keep This is a notable website. See en.Wikipedia article and references therein. ZimZalaBim 01:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC) Speedy keep as...
Click to read more »also some sockpuppetry involved. Ahmadtalk 09:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC) Speedy delete this is nothing more than a glorified hoax by an xwiki lta. Praxidicae...
Click to read more »is higher than KT shows (maybe as much as 50% higher) because of marking speedy deletion candidates. Y0u 18:15, 14 October 2005 (UTC) Support, Y0u may not...
Click to read more »significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Has actually been speedy deleted three times on enwiki, as Jonathan Foley [1], as Jonathan David...
Click to read more »works that is ground breaking. Chabota (talk) 04:51, 30 March 2018 (UTC) Speedy delete as this is a sock of a globally locked user with 300+ accounts that...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy deleted by User:Pmlineditor under Wikipedia:QD#A3. Albacore (talk · changes)...
Click to read more »of a permissions request that did not succeed. Please do not modify it. Speedily closed as unsuccessful - User's only edit is to this page. Evidently is...
Click to read more »appear in the future.. --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 10:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Speedy Keep now as nominator had !voted Keep, no delete votes, merger/redirect...
Click to read more »StevenJ81 (talk) 16:46, 14 April 2017 (UTC) I think it's to the point of a speedy keep now. If it's renamed, I think a redirect can remain at the original...
Click to read more »article claimed without footnote that he had won a Saturn Award (avoiding speedy deletion for reason A4), but that is moot as the article now appears to...
Click to read more »on both pages. Thank you. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC) Speedy delete as a blatant hoax. When I Google this title, the only results that...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedy close as consensus was to keep, and new edits have fixed the problems in...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy deleted by me as a copyright violation. It was a blatant copy-paste from...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedy close as the article has now been fixed to resolve the problems that led...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedily delete per Has no content. This includes any article consisting only of...
Click to read more »delete G5, sock. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 23:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC) Speedy Keep because I have significantly improved it since its creation and because...
Click to read more »including "The movie starts off with..." is copied! Could've tagged this with speedy deletion for copyvio instead. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 13:36, 25 April 2025...
Click to read more »listed on the RfD page. --IWI (talk) 15:22, 27 December 2020 (UTC) Delete - speedy, if possible. LTA. SPV. Deleted numerous times across numerous projects...
Click to read more »bearing on their notability. --Ferien2 (talk) 08:56, 2 July 2024 (UTC) Speedy delete, non-notable spam. Кронас (talk) 21:32, 2 July 2024 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »the article.--Eptalon (talk) 09:24, 16 July 2026 (UTC) Delete i thought speedy deletion would be more appropriate here. it fails/violates multiple wikipedia...
Click to read more »and simplify it. Lolcats20 23:27, 16 December 2015 (UTC) Merge (Edit: and speedy close) Not surprising that the creator was unaware of the other article...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedy Keep in some sort. I stand corrected and withdraw this nomination, merger...
Click to read more »material, Fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 14:49, 2 July 2017 (UTC) I chose not to speedy because I think it seems to make a claim of notability. Only (talk) 16:30...
Click to read more »AJona1992 (talk) 03:45, 3 July 2011 (UTC) Delete Not notable. I tagged it for speedy before this. Theo10011 (talk) 13:51, 3 July 2011 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Pure original research and childish essay. It can be removed speedy --Lecz Ka (talk) 07:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC) Delete – per nom. --Hulged...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Copyright problems has been redirected to WP:AN. Just mark for speedy deletion. FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 19:34, 13 August 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »or "delete", such as merging. Delete We should just make that into a new speedy deletion suggestion. There's no reason not to have that for T3. -- Ricky81682...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep and speedy close. I have found a reliable source and I have five more. Deleting this...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy closing this as deleted. It's a hoax, along with all the other edits made...
Click to read more »wiooiw (talk) 21:00, 1 September 2010 (UTC) Comment You do know how to nominate for speedy deletion right? -DJSasso (talk) 16:56, 1 September 2010 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »even anything in Forbes or Stanford as they claim, so it should have gone speedy. DIVINE 21:06, 24 April 2024 (UTC) DIVINE, for quick deletion, we should...
Click to read more »articles. So do other Wikis. Rathfelder (talk) 22:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC) Speedy keep Any athlete winning a medal per notability on athletes at an Olympic...
Click to read more »many times over on en.wiki. -DJSasso (talk) 19:31, 11 January 2017 (UTC) Speedy Keep per DJSasso. See en:WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. StevenJ81 (talk) 21:28, 11 January...
Click to read more »of the kinks that I have had in the past with requesting things to be speedily deleted. I have gotten over everything that has happened to me in the past...
Click to read more »(talk) 02:38, 7 July 2019 (UTC) If it is a copyright infringement then speedy it. The subject itself is notable. He is a high ranking government official...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. speedy deleted by Fr33kman. -Barras talk 20:32, 31 May 2025 (UTC) Winston Churchill...
Click to read more »know its notable then its bad faith (or more likely misguided) to try and speedy something clearly notable. Basically WP:IAR would also apply here, how does...
Click to read more »Conflict of Interest editing. -Djsasso (talk) 20:14, 23 September 2021 (UTC) Speedy Delete - Per the discussion on the English Wikipedia's deletion page [1]...
Click to read more »with a simpler format. Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:13, 27 August 2018 (UTC) Speedy Keep and MiloDenn or any other editor remove or simplify complex sections...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy Keep Seems like it's fixed now. dotdotcomma (talk) 05:00, 1 January 2024...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. SNOW non-admin closure. Speedy keep. Goblin 23:14, 28 December 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Barras! Gerbilling (edit...
Click to read more »lot of other articles on Simple...--Isis♠(talk) 15:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC) Speedy Keep Deletion rationale no longer applies. --Philosopher Let us reason...
Click to read more »per nom. Article seem to fails WP:GNG.. but doesn't in anyway qualify for speedy deletion. 102.90.102.169 (talk) Strong Keep subject clearly passes w:WP:NAUTHOR...
Click to read more »appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Speedily closed, not valid; see Wikipedia:Inactive administrators. –Juliancolton | Talk...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy deleted - G4 - JFO Star. Griff (talk) 00:49, 28 January 2025 (UTC) John...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedy close as keep since it has been rescued. Note that page now involved in...
Click to read more »2009 at 8:43 am, although it may be closed more quickly due to WP:SNOW. Speedy Delete per A4.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 14:56, 7 November 2009 (UTC) Comment...
Click to read more »CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:41, 31 July 2025 (UTC) Delete spam, could be speedy deleted --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 11:02, 31 July 2025 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »2018 (UTC) Delete as above. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:50, 5 March 2018 (UTC) Speedy delete as a completely unsourced negative attack page in violation of literally...
Click to read more »We've seen an influx of notable articles being nominated. I encourage a speedy keep here. Blissyu2 (talk) 01:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »Delete article with no content 12345678910Fruit 16:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC) speedy Keep Note that articles with no content, or little or no meaning can be...
Click to read more »somebody created it (again). Astera🪻 talk edits 16:30, 26 August 2024 (UTC) Speedy delete - tagged as G4 as per above, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 16:33, 26 August...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete. Non notable, fails WP:GNG. This article was deleted multiple times...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy close as this article has been previously deleted after an RFD: See Wikipedia:Requests...
Click to read more »that man. The article is not resembling even a small article. It should be speedy deleted. --Sorrow3 (talk) 08:06, 14 July 2021 (UTC) @Sorrow3: the amount...
Click to read more »and/or conflict of interest? 89.8.171.154 (talk) 04:54, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Speedy Delete x-wiki spam Not necessarily spammed x-wiki but linked to a x-wiki...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy Keep - used as part of various infobox, no reason to delete. Camouflaged...
Click to read more »free to do so. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 10:29, 12 September 2011 (UTC) Speedily delete per Has no content. This includes any article consisting only of...
Click to read more »this. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Self promotion, thus speedily deleted. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Re-written completely. Speedy close. EhJJTALK 02:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC) The Secret of NIMH 2: Timmy...
Click to read more »the article lacks content so delete on those grounds, including possible speedy criteria. Goblin 00:34, 12 September 2011 (UTC) I ♥ The Rambling Man! Delete...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedied by me, cross-wiki promotion at enWP & arzWP --Griff (talk) 03:01, 6 April...
Click to read more »then at en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumar J. Doctor, and finally speedy deleted as "Unambiguous advertising or promotion". It was created here on...
Click to read more »that many articles, and it's debatable whether a sub stub is candidate for speedy deletion anyway. A lot of pages here are substubs, far more so than on the...
Click to read more »trying to get around their block on en.wiki. Since not a webhost isn't a speedy reason here I had to take it to RfD. DJSasso (talk) 17:15, 1 November 2018...
Click to read more »in another Wikipedia and a speedy deletion is contested, it must be taken to AFD. The creator must be notified of any speedy deletions. I believe this...
Click to read more »is definitely a claim. The not showing notability speedy gets used way to often here, that speedy is only meant for articles like "Joe Neighbour is an...
Click to read more »sources on the en article which proove notablity. I had just undeleted a speedy of this and then it was nominated for Afd. -DJSasso (talk) 19:18, 11 January...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy deleted under criteria G7 Lauryn (u • t • c) 14:34, 25 February 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. speedy kept based on changes and nominators withdraw James (T C) 02:52, 20 February...
Click to read more »title alone. CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC) Delete, speedy if possible. Cross-wiki self-promotion of a non-notable individual. Marbletan...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Delete Per nom. --I-on/talk/book/sand 22:13, 21 May 2010 (UTC) Speedy delete per above. Griffinofwales (talk) 22:14, 21 May 2010 (UTC) The outcome...
Click to read more »2011 (UTC) Delete per nominator. Kansan (talk) 07:48, 15 April 2011 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:QD#A1. -Barras (talk) 20:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per QD A4 Chemicalinterest (talk) 15:20, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Speedy delete A2 and A4, I believe Purplebackpack89 15:58, 7 December 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »any of the activities. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:59, 3 April 2019 (UTC) Speedy delete we've been here before, they're a global lta, we've also had an rfd...
Click to read more »write first. More will come. -DJSasso (talk) 13:31, 12 July 2013 (UTC) Speedy keep: With the category being expanded and it being a useful category, I...
Click to read more »copied from another website. --Belwine (talk) 13:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC) Speedy delete as copyright violation: It is copied from here: [1] Naddruf (talk)...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Delete. —MC8 (b · t) 21:23, Tuesday August 11 2009 (UTC) 50/50 Speedy keep Pikachu, Keep Jigglypuff, Weak Keep Lucario, Neutral to Merge on others:...
Click to read more »evaluate for themselves. --Auntof6 (talk) 01:26, 31 December 2017 (UTC) Speedy Delete. This article seems to fall firmly under the QD criteria for a hoax...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy as T2. -Barras talk 14:26, 2 March 2018 (UTC) Comment - as a point of clarification...
Click to read more »November 2018" seems to be a claim. The enwp version en:Draft:Andrimo is speedy as a G5. For community discussion. Clear article to delete. Cohaf (talk)...
Click to read more »193.207 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Somone added speedy tag on the article I wrote. Checking if admins keep it or delete. I will...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedily deleted by User:The Rambling Man. List of smoking bans (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »article can remove a speedy. Speedies are overturnable the minute someone objects unless its blatantly vandalism. An objected to speedy can then go to Rfd...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per above and nom. Razorflame 08:22, 19 October 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete We've been through this before Purplebackpackonthetrail (talk) 02:19...
Click to read more »follow instructions. I see a number of recent nominations that should be speedy closed as keep. Blissyu2 (talk) 12:27, 23 May 2023 (UTC) Delete Notability...
Click to read more »The article is long enough. --IWI (talk) 13:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep but I will note the version that was brought to RFD doesn't still meet...
Click to read more »all be deleted.) Delete. Goblin 14:48, 2 January 2010 (UTC) I ♥ Shappy! Speedy Delete per previous RFD: You wanted the link? Here's the link: Wikipedia:Requests...
Click to read more »immediately close this RfD as speedy keep per the many reasons stated above. Phaedriel - 13:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC) speedy keep, per Phaedriel, it's Ionas...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - Honestly could be speedied, but basically, no significant coverage anywhere. Does not show notability...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedily deleted -- this is the same kind of article as was previously deleted by...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedily deleted -- this is the same kind of article as was previously deleted by...
Click to read more »really suited to this project at the moment. J Di 14:59, 7 April 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete under quick deletion criteria A4. PTO 16:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC) These...
Click to read more »2023 (UTC) Speedy Delete. Unsourced page with subject that is not notable. Illusion Flame (talk) 17:04, 10 April 2023 (UTC) Please speedy del it. It's...
Click to read more »(UTC) Indeed, It's been speedied twice per "There is no channel with this name" ...., Also pinging @Fr33kman who may wish to speedy delete the article and...
Click to read more »there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep speedy keep. I've helped the article a little bit. added two sources and so on...
Click to read more »--Auntof6 (talk) 11:09, 27 June 2018 (UTC) Why would you want to get it speedy deleted without having to check it's content. I feel its highly unfair to...
Click to read more »Already has been deleted per a deletion discussion, so nominating it for G4 speedy deletion Illusion Flame (talk) 12:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC) In the End: There's...
Click to read more »June 2022 (UTC) @PotsdamLamb: It's a bit odd for someone to tag a page for speedy deletion moments after it was made and then say "If you can expand it and...
Click to read more »reliable sources available. User:Rus793 (talk) 17:50, 12 November 2015 (UTC) Speedy Keep -- The improvements helped quite a bit! This is one of those cases...
Click to read more »discussion - redirect per nom. Hiàn (talk) 23:23, 10 February 2019 (UTC) Speedy redirect SITH (talk) 23:27, 10 February 2019 (UTC) Why did you create a...
Click to read more »DMacks (talk) 17:44, 8 November 2020 (UTC) Delete - this should have been speedy. Quakewoody (talk) 19:01, 10 November 2020 (UTC) Delete - nothing indicates...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy Keep - used in Template:Infobox Latter Day Saint biography, which the same...
Click to read more »Delete - Spam. IWI (chat) 23:25, 2 July 2020 (UTC) Should have been a speedy delete. Quakewoody (talk) 02:41, 3 July 2020 (UTC) Delete - non-notable;...
Click to read more »such as merging. Comment: the English Wikipedia article was tagged for a speedy deletion rather than a nomination or request for deletion like here thereby...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedy close as keep: No reason to keep this running so NAC'ing... Goblin 23:01...
Click to read more »"vote" is the initial nomination. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC) Speedy keep. Notability criteria for educational institutions follow enwiki. So...
Click to read more »that you guys like it! Razorflame 21:26, 8 February 2008 (UTC) Are there speedy deletions here? нмŵוτнτ 00:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC) {{qd}} Razorflame 00:05...
Click to read more »see m:Wikiproject:Antispam/Archives/2023/Papa2004#F. Not eligible for speedy delete unfortunately. MER-C (talk) 19:49, 25 January 2024 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »under full protection because it was repeatedly recreated. Probably could speedy this article due to this. Ravensfire (talk) 17:07, 19 August 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »it and it got a response days later. Much more effective to mark it for speedy deletion or leave a message on the administrator's noticeboard. FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ ...
Click to read more »from future articles. --Belovedfreak (talk) 15:11, 21 December 2009 (UTC) Speedy keep is too useful.-- † CR90 18:46, 21 December 2009 (UTC) Keep I think...
Click to read more »this sort of list to ever be comprehensive, which is, imo, an immediate speedy. Goblin 13:15, 30 December 2010 (UTC) I ♥ Pmlineditor! This request is due...
Click to read more »throw my weight on keep Munachichloe (talk) 15:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC) Speedy Keep According to this and this and also this, and even earning recognition...
Click to read more »is also a notability issue Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 03:29, 11 July 2024 (UTC) Speedy delete. Look like non-notable spam. Кронас (talk) 14:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »deletion was to Delete. Clearly fails notability guidelines for music. Speedy close or The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. optional...
Click to read more »(UTC) Then you agree your edits are a conflict of interest? Plus, we have a speedy deletion criterion that suggests content which is copied from en.wiki which...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete - as pretty much a duplicate of Edward Williams. Little to no content...
Click to read more »This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted...
Click to read more »Delete: I can find no sources. Naddruf (talk) 23:49, 31 December 2020 (UTC) Speedy Delete the article in Persian and (I think) Arabic is also under quick deletion...
Click to read more »--Eptalon (talk) 15:04, 25 July 2020 (UTC) Delete this should have been 'speedy'. And the reason the recreation "was missed" is because the user(s) keeps...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy Delete I think QDA4 could have applied as TV programming is a product. --Gotanda...
Click to read more »does not constitute spam. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:37, 2 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy Keep - Not really spam... George Edward C – Talk – Contributions 06:50,...
Click to read more »already exists, we need to deal with it here. An admin could decide to speedy close because the creator emptied it. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:54, 14 June 2013...
Click to read more »merging. Delete per nom. StevenJ81 (talk) 17:51, 26 October 2015 (UTC) Speedy Delete - copyvio. //nepaxt 18:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC) Comment. Originally...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. - Speedy deleted A4 by Auntof6 - IPs kept reverting my A4 CSD which is why I came...
Click to read more »(talk | contribs) 19:58, 27 April 2025 (UTC) Delete - AI slop. Can't be speedy deleted because there's no criteria for it unfortunately, –Davey2010Talk...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep, per Hmwith. Griffinofwales (talk) 19:09, 2 September 2009 (UTC) Speedy Keep Can be used very effectively.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:34, 4 September...
Click to read more »notability. These are just sales and corporate recognition as advertising. Spam. speedy delete. --Gotanda (talk) 23:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC) Gotanda, for A4, it really...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedily delete per Has no content. This includes any article consisting only of...
Click to read more »wiki. No rush, no everlasting backlog like on en:WP:AIV, pages aren't speedied immediately (so that the n00bs can have their 5 mins of "fame" before they...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedied as QD-A4 Exert 18:01, 11 October 2010 (UTC) List of United States network...
Click to read more »25 June 2007 (UTC) Speedy keep per current version. And sorry for being late - Huji reply 19:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC) Result: Speedy keep · Tygartl1·talk·...
Click to read more »Either way (talk) 20:56, 30 May 2010 (UTC) Very speedy keep/Request early closure The version that was speedily deleted is completely different than this one--that...
Click to read more »if its a content related issue, we don't use RfD as a first step, and certainly not to fix articles. Speedy keep. Synergy 23:23, 4 January 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Delete: Appears to be an ad for this Johncito fellow. Probably could be speedied Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 06:46, 7 April 2011 (UTC) Delete - it has serious...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedily kept. Definitely a reasonable category. Also, three is our minimum number...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedily as a hoax without prejudice to recreation so long as the content is sourced...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedily deleted as copyvio Operator873 connect 03:09, 9 September 2022 (UTC) Pepe...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedied as G11. Mentioned article had already been deleted many times. Pmlineditor ∞...
Click to read more »15:14, 29 November 2011 (UTC) Gone - non-notable so qualifies nicely for speedy deletion. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:13, 30 November 2011 (UTC) Note - The...
Click to read more »20:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Have you made your research before nominating speedy deletion to an article a user took time to write and edit, you can google...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedily deleted as likely hoax Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedied per G12. Article was promotional and looked like a copyvio anyways. Pmlineditor...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedied per C1. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:12, 21 July 2011 (UTC) Category:Pages...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) If there are no objections within 24 hours, I'm going to start speedy-deleting stubs under 20 words long citing QD A1. It's ridiculous to think...
Click to read more »by the same editor as well, but the article is up to the EN side to PROD/speedy. Chenzw Talk 02:03, 17 December 2011 (UTC) Delete - per Chenzw. Beefball...
Click to read more »(UTC) Yup that was why I nominated it. Because then I will have an extra speedy tool at my disposal if its recreated. -DJSasso (talk) 17:37, 11 April 2016...
Click to read more »article on enwp. Malinaccier (talk) (Rev) 23:42, 6 December 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete - No content (or context), non-notable, 100% sub-cruft and no aricle...
Click to read more »not articlespace but would have no objections if someone else wants to speedy it, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 22:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete: I would have said speedy under A4, but I see that was declined. I don't see any established notability...
Click to read more »was added by Bionlpumass (talk • changes) at 16:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC). Speedy Delete. Copyright violation: National Center for Biotechnology Information...
Click to read more »merging. Delete per nom. --Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 01:54, 7 June 2019 (UTC) Speedy delete: This is purely spam and has been deleted multiple times. ‐‐1997kB (talk)...
Click to read more »he was doing, because almost all of them qualify for speedy deletion under the unlikely typo speedy criteria. While I agree redirects are cheap, creating...
Click to read more »that think its ok to speedy, don't forget these have all been to Rfd and kept, which means they are no longer eligible for speedy deletion. -DJSasso (talk)...
Click to read more »the sandbox is in your userspace, you can add the template {{qd-user}} (speedy deletion for pages in one's own userspace) to the page. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉...
Click to read more »deletion request. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 18:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC) Speedy Keep per Shoot. Yeah I'm baffled by this nomination too if I'm honest -...
Click to read more »DovahFRD, even without that this album should be kept. I'd argue for a Speedy Keep here. Blissyu2 (talk) 05:03, 8 May 2023 (UTC) @Blissyu2:We generally...
Click to read more »Reads like a PR handout. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:53, 18 July 2023 (UTC) Speedy delete cross-wiki spam; refs are not reliable nor the person is notable;...
Click to read more »thing before. I was just saying that the fact that enwiki has an actual QD speedy deletion option for this doesn't determine what is done here. --Auntof6...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedied per G7 after author blanked. PmlineditorTalk 08:14, 24 September 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedily deleted -Orashmatash (talk) 10:41, 4 March 2012 (UTC) The Disney Broadcasting...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Page was speedily deleted. Goblin 23:13, 11 December 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Belinda! Category:Main...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedied by Exert as G1. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 05:41, 19 March 2011 (UTC) QueenOrangeSoda...
Click to read more »use them. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:27, 3 July 2015 (UTC) I believe that speedy deletion should be removed because it gives people barely enough time to...
Click to read more »processes. If you have just created an article and it is nominated for speedy deletion, it can be sensible to add the {{hangon}} tag and then to state...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedily closing, clearly inappropriate request. Mh7kJ (talk) 17:30, 14 June 2013...
Click to read more »Obvious advertising, possibly by the subject of the article. Should this be speedied? Blissyu2 (talk) 12:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC) Delete Non-neutral and...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete per nom. Was also speedily deleted at enwiki for non-notability. I have just QD'd the article about...
Click to read more »content. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 19:55, 8 September 2011 (UTC) Delete, possibly speedily per A4. Goblin 00:29, 12 September 2011 (UTC) I ♥ The Rambling Man! This...
Click to read more »