Redirect to:
There are two basic types of spam: advertisements hidden as articles and robot-made link spamming. Articles that are advertisements include those that...
Click to read more »Delete. Not needed Peterdownunder (talk) 12:05, 19 August 2023 (UTC) Template:Spam blanked (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request...
Click to read more »advertising, by Macdonald-ross--Eptalon (talk) 15:15, 3 October 2021 (UTC) Spam again (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:How to write Simple English pages Wikipedia:Manual of Style Wikipedia:Spam Wikipedia:Spelling Wikipedia:Template substitution Wikipedia:Change summary...
Click to read more »spam. Author is also being rather disruptive. Nigos (talk | changes) 03:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC) Delete Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam,...
Click to read more »puppeteers usually use sockpuppets to vandalize, harass other editors, or spam; they also tend to use these sockpuppets to prevent other editors from easily...
Click to read more »to add them. For malware or serious spamming, please read Wikipedia:Spam blacklist and Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam to recommend site-wide blacklisting...
Click to read more »term spam. For reference: Enwiki draft, Enwiki userpage Userpage spam 1, userpage spam 2 Oldest account I could find Nope, this is older Long term spam since...
Click to read more »help. There are other anti-vandalism gadgets there besides these. Wikipedia:Spam Vandalbot Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress Anti-vandalism ideas #cvn-simplewikis...
Click to read more »deletion/Requests/2020/Joseph Kargbo too and has been spammed multiple times, this is long-term spam. Joseph kargbo junior (edit · talk · history · links...
Click to read more »of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy close as not notable spam article Peterdownunder (talk) 10:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC) Zeshan Khan (film...
Click to read more »his/her user page does not constitute spam. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:37, 2 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy Keep - Not really spam... George Edward C – Talk – Contributions...
Click to read more »Thanks. lp0 on fire () 22:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) I think we'd consider spam to be a form of vandalism so I don't have a problem with you using the global...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Delete. Notabliity not shown, cross-wiki spam...--Eptalon (talk) 15:22, 27 July 2019 (UTC) Rasim Bajrović (edit · talk...
Click to read more »one website is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. This may be seen as spamming. Transclusions of templates and parser functions in signatures are forbidden...
Click to read more »has been any spamming happening on that page. The page describes the user. Chenzw Talk 16:21, 13 March 2020 (UTC) I just mean spamming of themselves...
Click to read more »the same way as any other account if they are found to be vandalizing or spamming. Vandal and spambots should be blocked as soon as possible. If you need...
Click to read more »spam-1|1=$1|2=$2}} spam2:{{subst:huggle/warn-spam-2|1=$1|2=$2}} spam3:{{subst:huggle/warn-spam-3|1=$1|2=$2}} spam4:{{subst:huggle/warn-spam-4|1=$1|2=$2}}...
Click to read more »Najar, and en:Draft:Catch Food all being created on the same day clearly a spam attempt. Simple wiki should not be higher searched than the actual website...
Click to read more »bottom of an article, but a page should not just be links. That is called spam. Mere collections of internal links. If a word has many meanings, you can...
Click to read more »merging. Delete. Crosswiki spam about a non notable "film maker". Deleted several timer on dawiki as well. They are spamming the shortmovie at the moment...
Click to read more »for the reason: Doesn't meet the notability policy. Created by a UPE for spam/promotion. BRP ever 13:00, 12 February 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »as merging. Delete - typical spam promotion. Fails GNG. --IWI (talk) 10:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Delete - typical spam and complete fantasy, frankly...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Undisclosed paid-for spam by WMF banned spammer Bodiadub (see m:Wikiproject:Antispam/Archives/2021/Wikibusiness)...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Quickly deleted as spam Operator873talkconnect 13:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC) Dr. Ahmed Ibrahim Nageye...
Click to read more »articles across many languages started as self-promotion and cross-wiki spam. Then, someone at the English Wikipedia saw a red link at the Women in Red...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete - non-notable spam. --IWI (talk) 10:24, 22 October 2020 (UTC) Delete Not notable, spam. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:38, 22 October...
Click to read more »quickly like to thank everyone who participated in my rfa. I decided not to spam every single one of you, and left a message at WP:ST instead. Also a big...
Click to read more »of this request for deletion was to Delete. Quick deleted under G11 as spam/advertising. Hiàn (talk) 01:44, 9 November 2020 (UTC) Arun khator (edit ·...
Click to read more »for deletion was to Delete. Quickly deleted as copyright violation and spam. Operator873talkconnect 02:20, 10 April 2021 (UTC) Saša Milivojev (edit ·...
Click to read more »of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy close as promotional spam Peterdownunder (talk) 22:22, 30 April 2021 (UTC) Sidhharrth S Kumaar (edit...
Click to read more »space, created an article draft about the CEO of Holo. Both appear to be spam. Both follow the typical WP:UPE pattern of 10-ish random edits, creating...
Click to read more »comment added by Jamirkoeck (talk • contribs) Delete. Non-notable promotional spam. I cannot find any evidence of the subject's notability. Hiàn (talk) 11:53...
Click to read more »Sophocrat (talk) 20:49, 25 June 2025 (UTC) Quick delete: Recreated spam page by a known spammer from India. --Achim55 (talk) 13:56, 27 June 2025 (UTC) QD'ed...
Click to read more »are spam and are notable and factual information. You are just discriminatory. Jose82923 (talk) 10:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC) Delete. Obvious spam, and...
Click to read more »reason: Young movie director, born 1998. We get his article as cross-wiki spam. When searching for him on Google, wikipedias (amonst others: French) are...
Click to read more »article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and you must always: Avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines,...
Click to read more »threaten some person or thing and are not otherwise useful, but not normal spam links. Other valid deletion under Deletion Policy. Apart from fixing cut-and-paste...
Click to read more »a cross-wiki spam attempt by many socks, hence the many site links. --IWI (talk) 20:51, 27 January 2021 (UTC) Delete - Cross-wiki spam, delete --Belwine...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:05, 5 November 2021 (UTC) Delete Undisclosed paid-for spam, cross-wiki spam, see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Çelebicihan,...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Spam/hoax. Vermont (talk) 20:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC) Hassan Babamahmoodi (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Promotional spam Peterdownunder (talk) 21:52, 27 August 2022 (UTC) Shiva SS (edit · talk ·...
Click to read more »Not notable and decade-long ongoing spam. They have created several single-purpose accounts that just create spam articles. This one is likely a copyright...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Quickly closed as spam. Operator873talkconnect 23:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC) Bryce Wymenga (edit · talk...
Click to read more »for deletion was to Delete. QD'd as G11, made by a paid editor sock for spam purposes. Vermont (talk) 18:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Kumar Abhishek (edit ·...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. quickly deleted as xwiki spam. Operator873talkconnect 13:01, 13 July 2020 (UTC) Lo∨ifm Top Songs (music...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Self promotional spam Peterdownunder (talk) 23:42, 29 April 2022 (UTC) User:Alex makeyev (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. QDd as spam/advertisement BRP ever 08:41, 27 January 2022 (UTC) Poovia Catus (edit ·...
Click to read more »December 2020 (UTC) Delete Spam --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 23:02, 25 December 2020 (UTC) Delete not notable at all. Obvious spam. --IWI (talk) 04:25, 26...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy due to long term abuse as spam. Been dealing with this editor cross-wiki for quite awhile. -DJSasso (talk)...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Quick deleted G11, as spam. Vermont (talk) 01:47, 7 March 2019 (UTC) Chaka agency (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. LTA spam, nuked by Auntof6--Griff (talk) 06:41, 31 March 2022 (UTC) John Scott (musician)...
Click to read more »=talk= 17:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC) Delete spam. Not notable. IWI (chat) 04:57, 19 June 2020 (UTC) Delete spam --Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 00:04, 21...
Click to read more »person, xwiki vanity spam, see also en:Engjëll Berisha which is notable, but is not this person. Sourced to nonsense black hat seo spam. Praxidicae (talk)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete xwiki vanity spam, totally not notable. Praxidicae (talk) 12:32, 22 April 2020 (UTC) Delete per Prax - Spam. Get rid. –Davey2010Talk 21:28...
Click to read more »x-wiki spam Not necessarily spammed x-wiki but linked to a x-wiki spammer. --Minorax (talk) 09:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC) Delete not notable, LTA spam. JavaHurricane...
Click to read more »usually one or more from among the following: Vandalism, sockpuppetry, spamming or having a bad username. You should also review the blocking policy. As...
Click to read more »MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam created by WMF-banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. MER-C...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. QD'd as spam/advertisement by long-term abuse.-BRP ever 12:15, 15 April 2022 (UTC) DC...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Per Snow non-notable, spam. -Barras talk 09:02, 30 January 2010 (UTC) Musiquip (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete spam, part of a cross-wiki attempt at spamming the subject of the article. See the contribs of the...
Click to read more »Skoshili (talk) 19:45, 4 February 2026 (UTC) Note - This subject is being spammed at multiple wikis various multiple accounts. This seems to be the latest...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: non notable person, xwiki vanity spam sourced to blackhat SEO and other non rs Praxidicae (talk) 16:09, 22 December...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete yet more cross-wiki spam by WMF banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. MER-C...
Click to read more »what is supposedly their "Official website" has been identified as spam by the spam filters. I also had to restore an earlier version as the RfD was removed...
Click to read more »to Delete. QD'd as a hoax. No such entity. At the very best, it might be spam. Operator873 connect 05:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC) Aria Atlantic (company)...
Click to read more »MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam created by WMF-banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. MER-C...
Click to read more »Looks like spam, I had to remove some promotional material already --Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 16:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC) Delete spam. IWI (chat)...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: xwiki paid for vanity spam sourced to black hat SEO and other non rs. Praxidicae (talk) 16:04, 22 December...
Click to read more »spam created by IP Çelebicihan sock, see w:Wikiproject:Antispam/Archives/2021/Çelebicihan. MER-C (talk) 17:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC) Delete As spam/advertising...
Click to read more »are spam and self-published. This should have been quickly deleted. --Ramaswar(discuss) 09:00, 7 November 2021 (UTC) Delete undisclosed paid-for spam, see...
Click to read more »powerlifter is as notable as he says he is, in addition, this is complete spam and has been re-created several times by a sockpuppet network at enWP. In...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete - non-notable spam. --IWI (talk) 09:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC) Delete. Promotional spam of not notable person. Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete undisclosed paid-for spam. MER-C (talk) 12:45, 24 January 2022 (UTC) Delete - None of the singers...
Click to read more »December 2024 (UTC) Quick delete as spam. Red-tailed hawk (talk) 01:14, 12 December 2024 (UTC) Quick delete Spam, Promotional, AI Generated Content, and...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. obvious spam G11 fr33kman 17:18, 11 September 2023 (UTC) Yoanna Gouchtchína (edit · talk...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Promotional spam Peterdownunder (talk) 11:41, 10 August 2023 (UTC) DaVinci Resolve (edit ·...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Unremarkable spam. Operator873 connect 18:50, 18 June 2023 (UTC) Abhijeet Gholap (edit · talk...
Click to read more »Cross-wiki spammer. Bovlb (talk) 02:15, 10 May 2023 (UTC) Delete No claims of notability. Being good at his job isn't notable. This is spam. Blissyu2...
Click to read more »of this request for deletion was to Delete. As QD G6Talk on talk page is Spam Promotional/Advertising on talk page reference topic of Page. -- Enfcer (talk)...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Quickly deleted as xwiki spam Operator873talkconnect 21:50, 25 July 2020 (UTC) Ebrahim Darvish (edit ·...
Click to read more »merging. Delete non notable, doesn't meet any of en:WP:NMUSIC. Likely spamming. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC) Comment: - nominated...
Click to read more »spam by Xenen1970 sockpuppets, see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xenen1970. MER-C (talk) 18:19, 12 November 2021 (UTC) Delete visible spam....
Click to read more »they are created by a globally locked user which looks to me as X-wiki spam. Zaxxon0 (talk) 00:03, 21 June 2019 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »1/2 years. In that time he's created numerous articles, diligently fought spam and vandalism, and taken part in countless community discussions. Max is...
Click to read more »for deletion. Can't find any reliable sources. Also could be cross-wiki spam, as I found this was posted on some non-English wikis in English. --Ferien...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Undisclosed paid-for spam supported by black hat SEO spam sources (see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Egodarchar)...
Click to read more »Quick Delete as A4, and cross-wiki spam. --Minorax (talk) 01:49, 20 July 2021 (UTC) Quick delete Cross wiki spam. Possible COI. Darubrub (Let me know)...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Quickly deleted as global spam Operator873 connect 18:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC) Ronnie Teja (entrepreneur)...
Click to read more »that there was any such rule for spam that we have here and I think that we need a rule for spam because I think that spam is a major problem on the Wikipedias...
Click to read more »MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam created by WMF-banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. The...
Click to read more »March 2024 (UTC) Delete cross-wiki spam, see m:Talk:WikiProject:Antispam#Z812483032 - file linkspam and article spam and en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet...
Click to read more »comments about this. However, since it is a steward who tagged it as Cross-wiki spam + deleted previously on Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2019/Youssef...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. per G11, terms of spam and advertising -- Tdxiang 05:55, 15 January 2011 (UTC) The Song of Troy...
Click to read more »December 2021 (UTC) Delete PR spam. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:28, 22 December 2021 (UTC) Delete undisclosed paid-for spam supported by black hat SEO sources...
Click to read more »advertising-like neptunepie | chat? 17:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC) Delete clearly is a spam advertisement created by the creator of the cryptocurrency.--Meritous (talk)...
Click to read more »for inserting spam as well as machine translated text. Spam is contained in "Other websites" paragraph, where these links were spammed in mass before...
Click to read more »spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios). MER-C (talk) 17:17, 7 November 2021 (UTC) Delete spam/advertising...
Click to read more »merging. Delete Speedy Delete as spam and advertising. Blissyu2 (talk) 15:09, 26 September 2021 (UTC) Delete spam/advertising. SHB2000 (talk) 01:37...
Click to read more »(change · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) Could possibly be a spam; no article on en Microchip 11:53, Saturday, June 21 2008 Utc}} Actually...
Click to read more »delete. Look like non-notable spam. Кронас (talk) 14:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC) Delete, to me it is not necessarily spam. ToadetteEdit (talk) 18:42, 11...
Click to read more »not just a copy paste. Also the article is not just a PR promotion, so not spam either. No grounds to delete. Peterdownunder (talk) 06:13, 24 March 2021...
Click to read more »Delete more sock spam. Praxidicae (talk) 15:11, 24 August 2019 (UTC) Delete. Per Praxidicae, it does indeed appear to be LTA sock spam. Hiàn (talk)/editing...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Not notable at all, fake references, advertising and spam. BZPN (talk) 08:43, 30 November 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »roughly 30k people. We received it as cross-wiki spam, I would prefer to delete it (but not as cross-wiki spam; rather on grounds of notabity). The lady was...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete spam/advertising. SHB2000 (talk) 11:08, 16 October 2021 (UTC) Quick delete as spam/advertising. There is quite a bit...
Click to read more »--Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 01:54, 7 June 2019 (UTC) Speedy delete: This is purely spam and has been deleted multiple times. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 02:20, 7 June 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »article written by Artificial intelligence, complex languages. References are spam, Created article using ChatGPT. Raayaan9911 04:31, 5 December 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Undisclosed paid-for spam created by IP sockpuppet of BolsaOObsequios, see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: I have declined the QD for Cross-wiki spam that was brought here by Vituzzu. This is listed on multiple wiki's going...
Click to read more »219 (talk) 12:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC) Spam comes in many forms. Looks like, walks like and quacks like spam: "Especially for Cyprus it is a bit trading...
Click to read more »April 2020 (UTC) Delete pure spam/not notable --Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 01:55, 26 April 2020 (UTC) DeleteSpam / not notable. I will tag per A4/G11...
Click to read more »MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam created by WMF banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Wikiproject:Antispam/Archives/2021/Wikibusiness...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Doesn’t seem notable. Author is a person frequently spammed xwiki. Only source is the poem itself. Vermont (talk) 03:24, 11 June 2019...
Click to read more »Delete Fails GNG and is clearly promotional spam. -Djsasso (talk) 11:19, 29 October 2021 (UTC) Delete for spamming, not notable. --Ramaswar(discuss) 15:23...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete LTA cross wiki spam 2601:983:827F:6B20:5556:CC34:3A6B:9922 (talk) 05:08, 26 May 2020 (UTC) Delete. Obvious spam. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:42...
Click to read more »include the Times of india. Originally, this was nominated as cross-wiki spam; what i want though is a discussion on the merits of Mrs Desai, and not delete...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete self-promotional spam. --IWI (talk) 15:07, 20 December 2020 (UTC) Delete In my opinion this should...
Click to read more »wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Umesh_Kaushik). Possible spam, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umesh_Kaushik for protection log. MathXplore...
Click to read more »Praxidicae has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: xwiki vanity spam sourced entirely to blackhat SEO sites, not a single RS. Praxidicae (talk)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Not notable imo. Obvious spam. Jianhui67 T★C 17:09, 22 March 2019 (UTC) Delete. Geez this crosswiki spam is so annoying to delete, always appear...
Click to read more »consider spam vandalism. Vandalism is any disruptive edit. Spamming is disruptive. I wouldn't have hesitated to use rollback on this edit either. Spam is one...
Click to read more »— neuro(talk) has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Blatant spam, seems to be non-notable. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in...
Click to read more »an image uploaded by a sock puppet for cross-wiki spam purposes...'. So this may be cross-wiki spam. Given the search results, I don't think Miss Nadella...
Click to read more »reason: Non-notable, no existing articles elsewhere. Undisclosed paid for spam, see m:Wikiproject:Antispam/Archives/2023/Papa2004. Not eligible for G5 deletion...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Unremarkable person. Likely self promotion or spam Operator873 connect 21:39, 13 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »FatalFit has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki spam Dylan | ✉ | ✓ 21:56, 12 May 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »Delete - not notable at all. Self-promotional spam. IWI (chat) 18:54, 26 May 2020 (UTC) Delete Bordering on spam Dibbydib (talk) 02:52, 27 May 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »English Wikipedia doesn't have this article, and cryptocurrency is a common spam topic, I recommend deleting it. If someone wants to create it, they can do...
Click to read more »request MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki spam, Wikibusines article created by an IP that is highly likely Bodiadub. Non-notable...
Click to read more »sites. 2. Spam & Advertising: The article is corrected by Nakib4tech and I can say that there is no spam hints now. Thanks all Delete Pure spam. This is...
Click to read more »advertisements. DJRC (talk) 11:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Delete promotional spam. --IWI (talk) 11:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Delete Per my comments at Wikipedia:Requests...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete undisclosed paid-for spam, see w:User:Qiarring31. The author of this article is Qiarring311. MER-C...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete Unambiguous self promotion. Borderline spam. QD is valid. Operator873 connect 19:26, 11 December 2022 (UTC) Quick delete...
Click to read more »Urbanec has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki vanity spam by large active sockfarm; users Sandra.serbia, Milivojevsasa, Diana-agnel...
Click to read more »branch/school of Islam. It was originally nominated as Qiuick-deletion (cross-wiki spam). I propose to do a discussed deletion instead. So, thoughts? Eptalon (talk)...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete G4, cross-wiki spam.Tehonk (talk) 19:46, 13 April 2024 (UTC) Delete Too Soon to be on Wikipedia...
Click to read more »paid-for spam created by Xenen1970 sockfarm, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Xenen1970. Doesn't appear notable, sources are typical for paid-for spam. MER-C...
Click to read more »since 2018. Article originally nominated for Quick deletion ("cross-wiki spam"). First page of google hits is social media, SEWP is in the top 5 search...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. Non-notable subject. Spam. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 17:49, 4 November 2017 (UTC) Delete. Not notable...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete undisclosed paid-for spam supported by black hat SEO sources. MER-C (talk) 17:59, 28 November 2021...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete Spam --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 03:42, 26 December 2020 (UTC) Delete Pure spam and a recreation of the recently deleted...
Click to read more »release. I can't find any that are independent and meet WP:GNG. This is likely spam and a COI issue. Djsasso (talk) 12:23, 26 August 2021 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »from Kennedy including writing about Simple News, P(V)GA's and some blatant spam! Bluegoblin7 - Article 4 This month Bluegoblin7 revisits the current situation...
Click to read more »as 'Imran Manzoor'. The page was created by a spammer, and the content is often replaced with their spam. If deleted, I would like to request the closing...
Click to read more »MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam created by WMF-banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. MER-C...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki spam by banned WMF spammer Bodiadub, see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bodiadub...
Click to read more »content like other wikis. On the English Wikipedia, the article has been spammed so much that it has been salted (protected against recreation by non-administrators)...
Click to read more »also available. Thanks. User:Aliasghar ghorbandokht Delete Non-notable spam. Blissyu2 (talk) 08:50, 15 January 2022 (UTC) Keep At least fame is available...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Quick delete LTA spam, delete this quicklyDerpdart56 (talk) 15:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »the IP addresses of temporary accounts for purposes of antivandalism, spamming, and violations of other policies. For purposes of determining 'autoconfirmed'...
Click to read more »is what triggered our spam filter: http://davidbowie.startingiseasy.com . Posting that address anywhere will trigger the spam filters to prevent saving...
Click to read more »spamming this across multiple wikis. "Engjell Berisha" is currently listed on Mediawiki:Titleblacklist to prevent creation due to persistent spamming...
Click to read more »fashion-designer, from a Tunisian/Lybian famlily; originally a QD request (cross-wiki spam, perhaps notability); I see Paris Match in the references. Paris match is...
Click to read more »inserting made up/hoax content as well as crosswiki spam and machine translation. I do not recall of any spam on this particular page, however can find numerous...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Not notable. Probably spam or PAID. Operator873 connect 06:19, 14 December 2022 (UTC) Delete Not notable...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Tunisian TV series of 2008; listed as QD (cross-wiki spam). I am unable to read the Arabic Wikipedia, but in the Frech wikipedia they...
Click to read more »Contents Different types of unhelpful changes Adding spam, such as promotions of objects or ideologies (collections of beliefs) Behavior towards editors...
Click to read more »-- Deborahjay (talk) 11:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC) There's the Wikimedia-wide spam blacklist. Maybe that's what Haoreima was thinking of. --Auntof6 (talk) 12:04...
Click to read more »be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. DeleteSheer spam and CV of the company. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:10, 20 January 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »for the reason: Originally marked as a QD request by Hangsna as cross wiki spam, which I declined as an invalid QD reason. Also claims of being deleted off...
Click to read more »October 2021 (UTC) Delete spam/advertising. SHB2000 (talk) 03:39, 22 October 2021 (UTC) Delete undisclosed paid-for spam. Known abuse pattern on en...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Cross wiki spam, already quickly deleted as DJ Sani and Sara Silavi , both in English and...
Click to read more »Delete I don't know if the company is notable, but this article is clearly spam and doesn't show any notability. Depextual (talk) 05:15, 12 December 2024...
Click to read more »16 June 2020 (UTC) Delete spam --Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 21:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC) Delete should've been QDd; spam. IWI (chat) 23:21, 16 June...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete self-promotional spam. IWI (chat) 18:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC) This request is due to close on 18:14...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable - cross-wiki spam. Unrelated to a Hungarian politician with a similar name. --IWI (talk) 15:03...
Click to read more »conflict) Oppose because the user has spammed heaps of user talk pages about this nomination. He has even spammed a template (diff). I don't know if that...
Click to read more »Delete per nom. --Griffinofwales (talk) 00:18, 7 June 2011 (UTC) Delete It's spam. I'm surprised it wasn't tagged as speedy, to be honest. EVula // talk //...
Click to read more »for why spammers circumvent the rules by allowing a 1 week advert. In my view, if you remove this motive then you may be able to reduce spam. Clearly...
Click to read more »and spammer, who uses spam, machine translations and other covert ways of vandalism on crosswiki level. This article does not contain any usual spam, however...
Click to read more »ShadowBallX (talk • contribs) 18:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC) Delete and SALT spam. Totally fails WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 18:55, 8 January 2021 (UTC) Delete,...
Click to read more »link after some vandalism). My main focus is and always has been vandalism, spam and abuse as well as trying to keep everything looking good and working well...
Click to read more »notable, and could have been QD'd. Macdonald-ross (talk) Delete. Xwiki spam. --Tiven2240 (talk) 02:46, 5 September 2021 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete undisclosed paid-for spam, long term abuse, see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xenen1970. MER-C...
Click to read more »Praxidicae has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: non-notable xwiki spam sourced to blackhat SEO. Praxidicae (talk) 15:16, 6 December 2020 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Quick Delete G4/G11 This is cross wiki spam created by a paid editing farm. This was created at this disamiguated title...
Click to read more »me edit Grace Wan Simple Wikipedia website. Delete undisclosed paid-for spam, see w:WP:PAIDLIST#Abtach. MER-C (talk) 09:21, 14 February 2022 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »for the reason: Not a notable company, a google search is flooded with SEO spam, and the sources in the article are either routine coverage, PR or unreliable...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. I think we have a cross-wiki spam on our hands: this young girl has 14 interwiki links, all of them contain...
Click to read more »Thanks. lp0 on fire () 22:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) I think we'd consider spam to be a form of vandalism so I don't have a problem with you using the global...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete yet another instance of cross-wiki spam by WMF banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. MER-C...
Click to read more »have significant coverage in reliable sources. I believe this is cross-wiki spam by the subject of the article. Griff (talk) 03:11, 26 March 2022 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »Undisclosed paid-for spam supported by black hat SEO sources. Non-notable, article on en.wp was moved to draft; I blocked it's author for spamming. MER-C (talk)...
Click to read more »sources. These cannot be used to establish notability. There's also some spam: "Mr. Arrows says, 'Please help me.' Contributions to the catholic school...
Click to read more »request Hiàn has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki spam by sockpuppet of globally locked user Parissa Official. Also note that the...
Click to read more »there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete spam. --IWI (talk) 17:16, 23 December 2020 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »reason: xwiki self promo, sourced to blackhat SEO, passing mentions and spam. Praxidicae (talk) 16:03, 22 December 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - self-promotional spam. IWI (chat) 00:22, 28 May 2020 (UTC) This request is due to close on 08:37...
Click to read more »guidelines and doesn't meet any of our other notability criteria. Likely spam/paid editing. BRP ever 06:32, 28 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »similar to school name. Article title suggests relation with Zeshan Khan spamming. MathXplore (talk) 07:09, 9 October 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: non notable vanity spam by an xwiki lta, no meaningful in depth coverage, everything is paid PR or...
Click to read more »projects, and it's darn time you realized. Stop spamming across Wikimedia projects. We will not tolerate spam of this type. Forget about Wikimedia projects...
Click to read more »well-used here anyway, spamming users probably isn't a good idea... Goblin 10:28, 17 January 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Yottie! It's not Wiki Project "Spam" but WikiProject...
Click to read more »MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam created by WMF banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. MER-C...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Cross-wiki spam, as shown by the deletion log on enwiki --Belwine (talk) 19:54, 13 April...
Click to read more »coverage.-BRP ever 04:55, 13 November 2021 (UTC) Delete undisclosed paid-for spam, see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stanleytux/Archive. MER-C (talk)...
Click to read more »blacklist as we don't really keep a local blacklist of spam sites. Go take a look at meta:Spam blacklist and request help there. They might be able to...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notability, possible spam? Derpdart56 (talk) 16:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to meet GNG and appears to maybe be spam. Djsasso (talk) 15:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »is nothing wrong with my rollback of all three diffs - the first two are spam links to external sites, while the third was vandalism and not suitable for...
Click to read more »𐤀 05:16, 30 March 2026 (UTC) @ExplorerofSpace For such pages just tag as spam and immediately report the user as block evasion and if you know how to,...
Click to read more »the reason: Not notable, created by user with conflict of interest, xwiki spam. See q:SNVRK and w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SNVRK Ternera (talk) 18:10...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Blatant promotional spam for a non-notable company. en:Draft:Tech talk2 has been deleted three times...
Click to read more »reason: Non-notable individual with no actual coverage. Also part of an xwiki spam campaign. Praxidicae (talk) 13:48, 26 November 2019 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »Praxidicae has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: xwiki vanity spam, black hat seo and otherwise non rs. See also FCBlinder. Praxidicae (talk)...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete SEWP among the first results. Promotional spam. --IWI (talk) 04:27, 26 December 2020 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »Bencemac has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki spam from DJ Parisa with the following associated pages: Hossein Movaghar and...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete non-notable spam. --IWI (talk) 15:48, 24 October 2020 (UTC) This request is due to close on...
Click to read more »as merging. Delete as no claims of notability. Likely paid advertising/spam. Blissyu2 (talk) 06:51, 4 November 2021 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Part of a long-going PR spam. BRP ever 11:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »close request Grayfell has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam. This article makes strong claims, but sources do not actually support those...
Click to read more »including Portuguese. No independent reliable sources. Probably Cross-wiki spam. Algébrico (talk) 20 29, 21 June 2009 (UTC) Please discuss this deletion...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I was going to QD this as spam but will give it a chance a RfD. This appears to be an unremarkable record...
Click to read more »significant coverage. Notability not established. Appears to be crosswiki spam: French Wikipedia, Ukrainian Wikipedia, Italian Wikipedia, German Wikipedia...
Click to read more »request MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki spam, Wikibusines article created by an IP that is highly likely Bodiadub. Non-notable...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete undisclosed paid-for spam, see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stanleytux/Archive. MER-C (talk)...
Click to read more »Delete Not notable, fails the general notability guideline, cross-wiki spam (yo:Rijvi Raj) --Belwine (talk) 11:54, 11 April 2021 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete purely spam, nothing noteworthy yet. The sources are self-published as well.--Ramaswar(discuss)...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by Xenen1970 (see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xenen1970). MER-C...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Possible spam, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cristian_Marino, some sentences are copied...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete undisclosed paid-for spam, see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stanleytux/Archive. MER-C (talk)...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy Delete as just spam. --Gotanda (talk) 22:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC) Delete - Not notable/ --Creol(talk)...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete per nom - non-notable spam. Hiàn (talk) 22:26, 1 March 2019 (UTC) Delete per nom. Macdonald-ross (talk)...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »at https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nueva_Econom%C3%ADa_F%C3%B3rum suggests spam. MathXplore (talk) 02:01, 30 September 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »• 💬 • 📜 15:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC) Delete no coverage. Promotional spam. --IWI (talk) 01:52, 24 January 2021 (UTC) This request is due to close on...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Is he notable enough ? Possible spam, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Thomas_Wolf. MathXplore (talk) 04:51...
Click to read more »them have titles like "Biography, Age, Net Worth, Comedy" and are obvious spam. Aranya (talk) 17:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:56, 27 August 2020 (UTC) Delete self promo spam. --Minorax (talk) 14:13, 28 August 2020 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete undisclosed paid-for spam. I've blocked the author on en.wp for this. MER-C (talk) 20:41, 9 December...
Click to read more »about the mentioned claim. Promotional article created as a part of ongoing spam. BRP ever 01:48, 1 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »ever, should you block a user without any warning? If he/she puts very bad spam on wikipedia or (if possible) hack into wikipedia, and change user's rights...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:08, 27 December 2021 (UTC) Delete - Comes across as cross-wiki spam. Notability? At least he has not been nominated for Deletion at English-wiki...
Click to read more »(talk) 07:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC) Delete yet more undisclosed paid-for spam by Xenen1970 sockpuppets, see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xenen1970...
Click to read more »sites). StevenJ81 (talk) 18:27, 12 January 2017 (UTC) Delete. Advertising spam. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:09, 14 January 2017 (UTC) Delete. Appears to be...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Created by a glocked spammer and UPE and [1]. Fails WP:GNG. KBDell2 (talk) 22:56, 14 January 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »({{test3}}) * Last chance ({{test4}}) * Only warning ({{test4im}}) * Don't spam ({{spam}}) * Blocked 1 ({{block}}) * Blocked 2 ({{block2}}) Whilst being very...
Click to read more »"strictly pornographic / instructional", and added that G-spot vibrator included spam links. He said that he would only undelete the article if there was community...
Click to read more »or "delete", such as merging. Delete more Xenen1970 undisclosed paid-for spam, see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xenen1970. MER-C (talk) 14:34...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Not notable, per nom, xwiki spam.--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:22, 25 February 2020 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »recreated on enwiki enough times it's been salted. Appears to be non-notable spam/self-promotion. Operator873talkconnect 04:07, 15 May 2021 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »--Ramaswar(discuss) 08:43, 7 November 2021 (UTC) Delete undisclosed paid-for spam. I'm sure I've seen this abuse pattern on en.wp, but cannot remember the...
Click to read more »Padres89 (talk) 18:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC) Delete undisclosed paid-for spam. I've blocked the author on en.wp for this. MER-C (talk) 20:40, 9 December...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete As advertising/spam. A lot of these so-called entrepeneurs are just people who want free advertising...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »notable. Pure Evil (talk) 23:55, 18 June 2022 (UTC) Delete xwiki paid for spam. Praxidicae (talk) 16:42, 20 June 2022 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »Padres89 (talk) 18:55, 1 December 2021 (UTC) Delete undisclosed paid-for spam. I've blocked the author on en.wp for this. MER-C (talk) 20:41, 9 December...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - self-promotion. IWI (chat) 18:51, 25 May 2020 (UTC) Delete spam --Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 18:52, 25 May 2020 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by Xenen1970 (see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xenen1970). MER-C...
Click to read more »per A4, in my opinion a pretty clear case of QD by a user who was just spamming.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 14:47, 4 February 2022 (UTC) Ashik (Internet celebrity)...
Click to read more »15:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC) Delete this is spam. --IWI (talk) 16:50, 5 January 2021 (UTC) Delete- spam and advetiseing article. KP (talk) 10:06, 7 January...
Click to read more »urban has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to be spam and lacks independent coverage Kk.urban (talk) 22:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Adelaideslement8723 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam, Promotional ☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 03:42, 12 December 2024 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »delete) I Like Acid3 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam. I LIKE ACID3 18:28, 14 July 2013 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete undisclosed paid-for spam. I've blocked the author on en.wp for this. MER-C (talk) 20:41, 9 December...
Click to read more »Anchorvale has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Possibly spam page, or a page to make the person look bad and silly. Anchorvale T@lk ...
Click to read more »notability. Fails NPOLITICIAN and as Djsasso has pointed out, the article is a spam. --Ramaswar(discuss) 15:26, 5 November 2021 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »close request Guanaco has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam by Vicky Kadian sockpuppets. Almost none of this is supported by reliable...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »(talk • contribs.) 19:07, 1 December 2021 (UTC) Delete undisclosed paid-for spam. I've blocked the author on en.wp for this. MER-C (talk) 20:41, 9 December...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete per nom. In theory looks like promotion or spam, anyway. StevenJ81 (talk) 16:59, 25 December 2016 (UTC) It looks more like...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete purely promotional and spam. This is a direct copy-paste from this draft on en.wp. --Ramaswar(discuss)...
Click to read more »be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - pure spam, non notable whatsoever. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:22, 1 October 2020...
Click to read more »request KnudW has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross wiki spam. Is it a hoax? I can’t really find anything. KnudW (talk) 18:54, 13 July...
Click to read more »12:28, 27 May 2026 (UTC) Delete Spam. Should be speedily deleted as part of the article creator's cross-wiki spam crusade. --Bedivere (talk) 04:47,...
Click to read more »by Griffinofwales (talk • contribs) 11:20, 10 February 2022 (UTC) Delete spam. Minorax (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2022 (UTC) Delete. An obvious promotion...
Click to read more »politician; there was a request for deletion in 2018 (here. Listed as cross-wiky-spam for quick deletion; Might have dleeted it a few times in the context of artilces...
Click to read more »Vicky Kadian is in the movie. IMDB says he will be, but that is probably spam as well. A complete rewrite may be possible, or we may not have enough information...
Click to read more »SkeletalDome$ (talk) 22:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC) Delete undisclosed paid-for spam created by the Xenen1970 sockfarm. MER-C (talk) 15:55, 4 September 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 04:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC) Quick delete Blatant spam/advertising. All sources are unreliable. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 04:04, 28...
Click to read more »statistics, but the changes got reverted for spam. I was wondering if someone could explain how that constitutes as spam? --12Dan21 (talk) 12:01, 6 November 2019...
Click to read more »believe this page is autotranslated as well as contains spam (Real estate market, which was spammed on multiple settlement articles on crosswiki bassis)...
Click to read more »Adelaideslement8723 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam, Promotinal ☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 03:48, 12 December 2024 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »close request Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam, same as Mohammad Safoyan Hossain. Ternera (talk) 18:26, 26 March 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »levels of low. I won't post a message on talk pages, but I'm not above spamming ST. --Gwib -(talk)- 18:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC) There are many in-depth...
Click to read more »I already have it. This tool will be helpful in reverting vandalism and spam. Thank you! Saroj Uprety (talk) 03:07, 25 October 2020 (UTC) Done DannyS712...
Click to read more »I'd say that personal recruiting on user talk pages is best, but don't spam them. Good question. There should be a way to see the number of page visits...
Click to read more »still alive" might be classed more simple, but rejected due to New changes spam as a result of performing the change. --NigelJ talk EN 21:51, 1 April 2007...
Click to read more »cases where the same spam article was created at multiple Wikipedias. Those articles didn't deserve to be kept just because the spammer created them at multiple...
Click to read more »close request MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam created by Xenen1970 sockfarm, see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xenen1970...
Click to read more »Johannnes89 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: crosswiki spam, deleted on enwiki [1][2], frwiki [3] and eswiki [4] Johannnes89 (talk) 17:18...
Click to read more »open RfD subpage Aafi has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam apparently, there's hardly anything to substantiate notability. ─ The Aafī...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Possible non-notable article, it's has a spam references. Raayaan9911 11:27, 13 April 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be notable; likely a spam bio CountryANDWestern (talk) 19:04, 21 May 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »close request Lymantria has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam or at least not notable. Sources are promotional advertorials full of superlatives...
Click to read more »close request MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam created by Xenen1970 sockfarm, see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xenen1970...
Click to read more »MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam created by WMF banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. MER-C...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Sources are totally unrelated. Another spam, PAID article with marginal or no claim to notability. CountryANDWestern...
Click to read more »notable. Griff (talk) 12:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC) Quick delete - Global spam! ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC) Quick delete - per above...
Click to read more »November 2021 (UTC) Delete yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by Xenen1970 (see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xenen1970). MER-C...
Click to read more »comment added by MrRajRumel (talk • contribs) Delete Speedy please. Cross-wiki spam. NahidSultan (talk) 08:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC) Delete Per above. --Hellothere4...
Click to read more »be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete more spam from Xenen1970, see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xenen1970. MER-C...
Click to read more »Delete - Not notable. --Yottie =talk= 19:02, 15 July 2020 (UTC) Delete - Spam about an unnotable subject — Infogapp1 (talk) 19:55, 16 July 2020 (UTC) speedy...
Click to read more »see Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2021/Isbae U. Wikibusines spam. MER-C (talk) 20:08, 15 December 2021 (UTC) Page already quick deleted per...
Click to read more »Praxidicae has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: xwiki vanity spam, sourced to black hat seo and press releases. totally not notable. Praxidicae...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete undisclosed paid-for spam, see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bullaiytro. MER-C (talk) 18:02...
Click to read more »November 2021 (UTC) Delete yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Comment. I would note that this was a QD-spam on enwiki. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:19, 26 July 2018 (UTC) Delete. I don't see...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Undisclosed paid-for spam supported by black-hat SEO sources. Not notable, no corresponding article...
Click to read more »notability. Griff (talk) 15:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC) Delete Wikibusines spam. MER-C (talk) 19:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC) Quick delete No notability and...
Click to read more »actual independent coverage to establish notability. Also this is xwiki spam. Praxidicae (talk) 10:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - undisclosed paid-for spam, as is the rest of this user's articles. MER-C (talk) 09:41, 30 August 2021...
Click to read more »January 2022 (UTC) Delete Author has a same name with subject, possible spam. MathXplore (talk) 03:07, 12 January 2022 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »promotional. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:51, 29 December 2020 (UTC) Delete. Spam and ad page which is not notable.KP (talk) 10:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »02:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC) Delete as per User:Gordonrox24 - lacksWP:RS and spam purpose article.KP (talk) 10:15, 7 January 2021 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »notable. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 14:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC) Delete-crosswiki spam (massive) and non notable. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:35, 13 January 2021...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:11, 6 November 2019 (UTC) Delete Non-notable cross-wiki vanity spam. Praxidicae (talk) 14:50, 6 November 2019 (UTC) Delete per nom. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion)...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - spam advertising. --IWI (talk) 20:20, 22 October 2020 (UTC) Delete and SALT....
Click to read more »October 2021 (UTC) Delete basically nonsense. No real use at all, just more spam related to the other related promotional articles already listed here at...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable, cross-wiki spam. No in-depth reference, just namedrops or interviews. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 15:30...
Click to read more »what we see on the ones on EnWP they are mostly in a state of decay, with spam, vandalism and bad information because I was one of the main ones watching...
Click to read more »request Styyx has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki spam with some refbombing to make it seem notable, without actually being notable...
Click to read more »fails WP:GNG. This is currently the subject of a cross-wiki promotional spam campaign (noting the author is currently locked as a sockpuppet of AMILTON...
Click to read more »used to detect likely abusive behavior patterns, like pattern vandalism and spam. In 2013, Global AbuseFilters were enabled on a limited set of wikis including...
Click to read more »Floating island is a new article (thanks to user:Eptalon).--Travel-guide spam should be deleted from the two other articles - and not moved into the new...
Click to read more »I ♥ Pmlineditor! Delete - Not notable, the usual bi-annually cross wiki spam campaign. I refer to the articles past history. Regards Knud Winckelmann...
Click to read more »reason: Not written in a neutral, encyclopedic tone, might fall under WP:SPAM. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 18:51, 28 January 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »close request Kadı has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: spam Kadı (talk) 21:34, 5 August 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: ☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 03:54, 12 December 2024 (UTC) Spam, Promotional, 5th time! ☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 03:55, 12 December 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »without significant achievements. This is also probably part of some xwiki spam BZPN (talk) 22:19, 6 June 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request below, but...
Click to read more »request Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: SEO spam Gotanda (talk) 02:01, 21 April 2018 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: SEO spam Gotanda (talk) 02:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: SEO spam Gotanda (talk) 02:02, 21 April 2018 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »Rzywiec has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki spam deleted in 2019 Kajtus von Rzywiec (talk) 22:19, 30 June 2026 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »notable, and I feel this is really just an extension of the SuperMarioLogan spam we've been seeing --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 09:37, 1 July 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »AI-generated article. Unverified, may be biased or contain errors, and full of spam references. Not simple either. Depextual (talk) 02:51, 5 December 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Johannnes89 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: crosswiki spam [1] by a sockpuppet of globally locked LTA fr:Wikipédia:Faux-nez/Praelongum...
Click to read more »of the spam references by new users or IP's. The books spammed so far are: Please watch for removal of valid references and replacement with spam, and revert...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Note to admin: Already spammed on en.wp[1] leading to blocking several accounts, SPI case on en.wp. Ramaswar(discuss)...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete as spam promotion with no reliable sources. Deleted on En, with three sockpuppets...
Click to read more »has already activated the global spam filter from flooding NC. Since I use a script to assist me with blocking spam sources, I can quickly generate many...
Click to read more »at this time. EhJJTALK 15:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC) I don"t really want to spam every person that participated in my rfa, so here's a notice to say thanks...
Click to read more »proposed a change to the deletion policy at Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy, re: spam on user pages. Comments would be appreciated, thanks in advance! --Ferien...
Click to read more »will likely be immediately and repeatedly deleted, as a type of interwiki spam. I don't think that is the approach we are looking for. I think Huji is absolutely...
Click to read more »press release. It has also been suggested that this is paid promotional spam. This is the only article on Simple English created by the author. I have...
Click to read more »August 2023 (UTC) Quick delete Papa2004 spam. MER-C (talk) 16:58, 29 August 2023 (UTC) What is Papa2004 spam. 88.110.38.249 (talk) 18:28, 29 August 2023...
Click to read more »November 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete. Spamming.-- Tdxiang 10:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC) Delete. It is useful, and it isn't spam, but it doesn't belong here. Perhaps...
Click to read more »The claims in this article are unverifiable. This has been the subject of spam on English Wikipedia. Depextual (talk) 22:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is written like a spam article and doesn't seem to be notable. Depextual (talk) 02:48, 5 December...
Click to read more »request Johannnes89 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: xwiki spam, not notable Johannnes89 (talk) 11:38, 15 June 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »long way. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:47, 29 January 2021 (UTC) Delete pure spam. --IWI (talk) 15:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC) This request is due to close on...
Click to read more »jargon without any basic, decriptive words whatsoever, meaningless stuff, spam, or just nothing at all. They usurp pages to put their complex irrelevant...
Click to read more »thanks to Chris G Bot and a few other vandal patrollers, it does create spam and unnecessary used up space in the new changes page. If this keeps up,...
Click to read more »the content of a user page, please let us know. If the page in question is spam, or similarly problematic, please use the corresponding talk page and mark...
Click to read more »by some IP, this iteration is very likely to be both undisclosed paid-for spam and not notable. MER-C (talk) 17:49, 28 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »I would say yes... -Djsasso (talk) 20:42, 27 August 2008 (UTC) Yes; {{qd|spam}}. mC8 20:42, 27 August 2008 (UTC) Hang on; userpage? Erm... VIP report filed;...
Click to read more »Special:Contributions. Please list the site calendaryear.net on the local spam blacklist as no such spamming was found on enWP. Chenzw (talk ▪ changes) 12:36, 29 March...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Quakewoody (talk) 14:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC) Delete pure spam. --IWI (talk) 14:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC) Delete Don't see NPOV Syman51...
Click to read more »SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC) Delete Self-promotion, crosswiki spam. There's no reason to keep this article MagicalNight97 (talk) 01:36, 10 September...
Click to read more »May 2020 (UTC) Delete Besides the lack of notability, this is a cross-wiki spam issue. The user (and others) has edited/created the page on many wikis, and...
Click to read more »(UTC) Yes, of course, anyone can warn users in any instance of vandalism, spamming, etc. Glad you're here to help. :-) -- RyanCross (talk) 02:41, 23 September...
Click to read more »TagUser has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable spam page. Also written by AI/LLM. TagUser (talk) 18:12, 4 May 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »he was now medicated and a much improved person the entire time he was spamming vandalised pictures of Gwib on multiple wiki's. He will tell you what ever...
Click to read more »Here is the global information on the locked account. They show this as a spam only account. I am wondering: What do others think? Should I do a global...
Click to read more »JavaHurricane (talk) 09:48, 22 May 2020 (UTC) Delete - totally unsourced spam. IWI (chat) 18:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC) This request is due to close on 17:20...
Click to read more »253 (talk) 14:44, 26 January 2022 (UTC) Delete mpre undisclosed paid-for spam from w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xenen1970. MER-C (talk) 18:40...
Click to read more »November 2021 (UTC) Delete yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »undisclosed paid-for w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BolsaOObsequios spam. MER-C (talk) 09:34, 24 January 2022 (UTC) Delete - delete per MER-C and...
Click to read more »sources. Darkfrog24 (talk) 15:00, 29 December 2021 (UTC) Delete Obvious spam, completely unsourced. Should qualify for quick deletion under WP:A4 and...
Click to read more »*cough* signature *cough* -- Creol(talk) 13:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC) Are you spamming? I hope not. Prime Contributer (talk) 13:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC) Interesting...
Click to read more »(UTC) If we had a singular event that we could rally behind, to justify spamming the English Wikipedia... we could probably make a good argument for including...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete not only is this spam, it's a TOU violation and the sources are completely fake. Praxidicae (talk)...
Click to read more »Fizz (talk) 17:16, 19 February 2020 (UTC) Delete Not notable, crosswiki spam.--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:21, 25 February 2020 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete spam, although I should add that not having an English Wikipedia aritcle isn't...
Click to read more »close request MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam created by Xenen1970 sockfarm, see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xenen1970...
Click to read more »Delete +1. Alan (talk) 23:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC) Delete It's a crosswiki spam, check the guc for this IP. Sorry I had to comment here I just saw this as...
Click to read more »by the author (who has also been globally locked) appear to be crosswiki spam brought over from EN. Chenzw Talk 16:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »November 2021 (UTC) Delete yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - non-notable spam. IWI (chat) 21:36, 1 June 2020 (UTC) Delete Questionable sources and self-promo...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »Renvoy has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: cross-wiki ad spam, created by globally banned user. Already deleted in bunch of Wikipedias...
Click to read more »en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wifiskeleton. Might be some cross-wiki spam. PieWriter (talk) 07:23, 22 January 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »promotional ☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 03:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC) Promotinal and Spam ☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 03:40, 12 December 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »request Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: SEO spam Gotanda (talk) 02:01, 21 April 2018 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: SEO spam Gotanda (talk) 02:00, 21 April 2018 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Undisclosed paid-for spam supported by black hat SEO sources. Not notable. MER-C (talk) 17:52, 28 November...
Click to read more »merging. Delete nn promotional. The article's creator has been blocked for spam. Blissyu2 (talk) 23:50, 13 June 2023 (UTC) This request is due to close on...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: 90% of this article was spam, which I've deleted. Is what's left worth keeping? Rathfelder (talk) 21:27...
Click to read more »AI generated. Unverified, may be biased or contain errors, also contains spam references. Not simple either. Depextual (talk) 02:55, 5 December 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »request Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: SEO spam Gotanda (talk) 02:02, 21 April 2018 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Undisclosed paid-for spam supported by black hat SEO sources. Not notable. MER-C (talk) 17:57, 28 November...
Click to read more »nominator. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 22:18, 7 December 2024 (UTC) Delete Promotional spam as per requester (?) Adelaideslement8723 (talk) 18:25, 11 December 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »request Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: SEO spam Gotanda (talk) 02:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »references on the web to its "governing body" that I see on Google seem to be spam type links. While there seem to be many references on the web to the concept...
Click to read more »the page. Having bots do this is just spam. -Djsasso (talk) 11:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC) idk why you say it's a spam. Haoreima (talk) 13:06, 18 March 2022...
Click to read more »#wikipedia-simple ~ R.T.G 07:10, 24 October 2008 (UTC) I would rather you did not spam talk pages with your any banner. I don't think it serves any useful purpose...
Click to read more »Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 21:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC) Delete probably paid-for spam. Anyway, this isn't a good faith attempt at contributing: w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet...
Click to read more »merging. It's pretty clear that the whole content has been copied verbatim (= spam), there is no attribution and no evidence of acknowledgement, and no evidence...
Click to read more »WP:BEFORECamouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC) Delete pure promotional spam. --IWI (talk) 09:49, 6 November 2020 (UTC) This request is due to close on...
Click to read more »Delete. Clearly non-notable and more or less the same sort of generic spam we always get. Hiàn (talk) 22:04, 25 May 2019 (UTC) Strong Delete Appears...
Click to read more »send email that could be known as a "personal attack", "vandalism-email", "spam" (many emails at a time) and "adversting-email".-- Psl631 talk contributions...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: article appears promotional, SPAM and does not have enough reliable sources to be considered notable for this...
Click to read more »Verifiability Citing sources • What Wikipedia is not Copyrights • Image use policy Spam • Vandalism • Deletion policy The Community Assume good faith • Be kind Community...
Click to read more »as a platofrm of exchange with other users from the same IP (basically spamming it). I think it would be a good idea to: Lock the respective article Ban...
Click to read more »achievement. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC) Delete clear spam. No independent coverage. --IWI (talk) 14:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »and have 10 edits. --Ferien (talk) 05:44, 29 September 2021 (UTC) I saw spamming in Google Translate article. People added crow language, fox language,...
Click to read more »Ferien hit the nail on the head. As a generic example, we do have global spam LTAs come here because they know the article will last at least 7 days while...
Click to read more »same. I would like to organise a similar set-up to the En version. Where we spam subscribers talk pages weekly (maybe monthly to start). Would anyone like...
Click to read more »@SoyokoAnis but there is a possibility that a person can use different IPs to do spam changes. For this purpose I asked so. Dibyojyotilet's chat 14:50, 13 October...
Click to read more »involved in fighting spam/vandalism, so I am a global rollbacker and have routinely been the most active admin in deleting spam on many projects. —Justin...
Click to read more »April 2021 (UTC) Delete No reliable sources on the article and long-term spam. --Ferien (talk) 18:47, 28 April 2021 (UTC) Comment: If this was deleted...
Click to read more »actually achieving something (aside from talking on IRC, regularly deleting spam/graffitti, and blocking users that provide this graffitti)? --Eptalon (talk)...
Click to read more »goal, it's definitely helpful if the majority of editors can take care of spam quickly and efficiently. –Juliancolton | Talk 21:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »your apology note. I wish I would not have to say this but you are creating spam. Also, your apology to enWP is your business, not ours. We (the community)...
Click to read more »request MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki spam, see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Çelebicihan/Archive and...
Click to read more »notability, and looking at the editor's xwiki contributions, nothing but spam. Looks like paid contributor. Billinghurst (talk) 03:19, 7 July 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki undisclosed paid-for spam, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Papa2004, or Wikibusines again. Non-notable...
Click to read more »Hey everyone! I know I've talked to many of you about this before and a good amount of the regulars know that I'm working on fundraising (for those that...
Click to read more »know I hate it when bots welcome me on other wikis because it just creates spam for me. For that matter you shouldn't actually be welcoming IPs at all really...
Click to read more »should not do anything. That would be like saying since we can't prevent all spam emails from entering our computer we should not setup any filter system....
Click to read more »important to source medical-related articles. Also, there have been cases of spam on both Simple English and En Wikipedia by advocates of "herbal remedies...
Click to read more »@Ottawahitech: Generally stuff is only removed from here if it's considered vandalim, spam, or such. Can you give any diff links? Computer Fizz (talk) 21:53, 17 February...
Click to read more »SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:51, 27 September 2021 (UTC) Delete undisclosed paid-for spam: en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sadeeqzaria. MER-C (talk) 11:18,...
Click to read more »discussing it here. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 01:52, 15 October 2021 (UTC) Delete spam/advertising. SHB2000 (talk) 10:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »Entrepreneur 2017[10] leads to an unrelated article in Hindi about the Ramayana. Spam. --Gotanda (talk) 04:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »close request Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam. Also seems like some of the article is directly copied from https://sqfoyaan...
Click to read more »close request Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam article. It's possible that the person is notable, but the references don't...
Click to read more »subpage ~2026-37126-38 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam article with fake claims of importance ~2026-37126-38 (talk) 04:01, 29 June...
Click to read more »notable; because it was created by an account that seems to be specializing in spam bios, I'm bringing it here for further input. CountryANDWestern (talk) 19:10...
Click to read more »CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced, quasi-spam article. Not sure that this is a necessary and encyclopedic topic. CountryANDWestern...
Click to read more »close request Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam, not a notable person, references do not seem to even relate to the subject...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete, PR and cross-wiki spam, no have sources. Кронас (talk) 10:08, 1 April 2025 (UTC) Delete The article...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki undisclosed paid-for spam, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Papa2004, or Wikibusines again. Non-notable...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - non-notable crosswiki spam. -Barras talk 17:05, 4 January 2026 (UTC) This request is due to close on...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete per nom. Could be qdeleted as LTA-spam --NDG (talk) 10:56, 13 March 2026 (UTC) This request is due to close on 18:10...
Click to read more »November 2020 (UTC) Delete --Alaa :)..! 14:01, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Delete spam. --IWI (talk) 15:36, 21 November 2020 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »clicking here. This is a temporary email address to protect myself from spam and harassment, and will be deactivated upon receipt of any abuse. However...
Click to read more »fit here or not. It is obviously useful, but unlike en we don't typically spam article talk pages with banners. -DJSasso (talk) 23:13, 26 July 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »appear, I also used this feature to determine pages on other wikis are they spam or not in my cross-wiki work and thus far, it's accurate. Camouflaged Mirage...
Click to read more »to hear from you to be able to give you better tools to handle vandalism, spam and harassment. You can post in your language if you can't write in English...
Click to read more »due to some sources used on English Wikipedia not being recognized by the spam filters on Simple English Wikipedia. You have to be really careful when you...
Click to read more »BG7THAT'S NUMBERWANG! 09:53, 3 April 2009 (UTC) Thank you: instead of spamming everyone again, I just want to thank everyone who contributed to my RFCheckUser...
Click to read more »fr33kman talk 19:11, 10 March 2009 (UTC) Thanks all. I figured instead of spamming this to everyone's talk page, that I would just leave a message here :D...
Click to read more »route, as ever. m:Voting is evil Finally, there's no need to continue spamming your 'project' everywhere. I'm sure the fact that you have 4 sign ups shows...
Click to read more »User talk) 15:45, 12 June 2022 (UTC) Delete and salt. Reposted cross-wiki spam, see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Egodarchar and Wikipedia:Requests...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross (talk) 19:47, 7 December 2020 (UTC) Delete promotional spam. --IWI (talk) 09:53, 14 December 2020 (UTC) Delete, this seems to be created...
Click to read more »November 2021 (UTC) Delete yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »focused on him. Aranya (talk) 16:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC) Delete non-notable spam. --IWI (talk) 16:50, 22 January 2021 (UTC) Delete Not notable + advertising...
Click to read more »(talk) 14:40, 31 March 2019 (UTC) Delete. Not notable - extensive cross-wiki spam from this LTA (see Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2018/Shaunak...
Click to read more »January 2019 (UTC) Delete article creator has extensive history of creating spam articles and is now blocked. Operator873talkconnect 05:59, 23 January 2019...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete- non notable, xwiki spam. --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 09:23, 19 February 2020 (UTC) this person is...
Click to read more »there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete spam. --IWI (talk) 20:27, 26 November 2020 (UTC) Delete. Very clear. Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete The page is about a random youtuber. It looks like spam to me. -Examknowtalk 14:19, 28 April 2020 (UTC) should be a Speedy Delete...
Click to read more »19:23, 26 April 2022 (UTC) Quick delete Clear A4, could possibly also be spam depending on the nature of these articles and if more were created elsewhere...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete: Spam by known SEO service IP from India, see https://spamcheck.toolforge.org/by-domain...
Click to read more »that upsets many many many editors. I know it drives me nuts when I get the spam messages when I haven't even edited on a wiki but because unified login created...
Click to read more »request Styyx has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki spam. 17 year old who is allegedly a singer and actor. The creator is blocked...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete yet more cross-wiki spam by WMF banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. MER-C...
Click to read more »privileges to send an editor a unique one-time chatty email? The email was not spam or sent repeatedly. Thanks, --Chemicalinterest (talk) 15:31, 8 November 2010...
Click to read more »forgot to add categories, and link to help pages. (with a switch to avoid spamming multiple notices). Part of the problem is that many of the categories used...
Click to read more »bytes, and currently the size of the page is in the millions. A person is spamming large amounts of text in mere seconds, making it so that other users cannot...
Click to read more »be blocked if they continue whatever it is that he/she has been doing (spamming, blanking pages, etc.), so this isn't necessary. Hazard-SJ ✈ 03:54,...
Click to read more »making serious contributions to this wiki (as opposed to real vandals, spammers, self-promoters, etc.), there are pretty much two QD rules that you have...
Click to read more »maintenance templates, it should also not need any. --Auntof6 (talk) Sorry for spamming Simple Talk, but I have a lot of ideas coming to mind at the moment. I...
Click to read more »আফতাবুজ্জামান has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross wiki spam, Non notable. The article has some refs, but all of them are basically interview...
Click to read more »page) (Contributions) 19:05, 11 December 2024 (UTC) Quick delete Promotional spam. Exceeds w:WP:REFBOMB ☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 01:46, 12 December 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Stale userpage draft that has also attracted spam --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:18, 12 October 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Non-Notable Article, This Article was Spam References, Fails GNG Raayaan9911 16:51, 16 December 2024 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »request Bovlb has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki spam. See d:Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2025/02/20#Q131858212, en:Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »close request MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam created by Xenen1970 sockfarm, see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xenen1970...
Click to read more »non-notable. 🌙 Raayaan9911 Ramadan Kareem! 15:07, 25 March 2025 (UTC) Delete spam article, promotional. Ternera (talk) 17:27, 25 March 2025 (UTC) Delete No...
Click to read more »am leaning toward.--In the event that this is not 'related to Lake Como spam', the painting is still not notable. 2001:2020:359:B9D1:9887:7164:DA12:1D6E...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »request MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki spam, see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Çelebicihan/Archive and...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki undisclosed paid-for spam, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Papa2004, or Wikibusines again. Non-notable...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete not notable at all, looks like an advertising or spam. BZPN (talk) 16:55, 29 November 2024 (UTC) Delete per nominatior, non-notable...
Click to read more »request Bovlb has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki spam with repurposing and conflation. I just separated the Wikidata item from...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki undisclosed paid-for spam, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Papa2004, or Wikibusines again. Non-notable...
Click to read more »displayed if an edit made with VisualEditor matches an edit filter (bug #50472). SpamBlacklist messages are also supported (bug #50826). Users can now edit <nowiki>...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:SOAP, cross-wiki spam, article build by SPA, undergoing delection disscussion on fr, ru and zh...
Click to read more »here. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 11:18, 30 April 2022 (UTC) Delete Pure spam. Blissyu2 (talk) 12:32, 3 May 2022 (UTC) This request is due to close on...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: completely and utterly non-notable child, spammed by several socks that have created numerous hoaxes. Praxidicae (talk) 20:43...
Click to read more »Praxidicae has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: non notable cbd spam - not a notable company, despite the numerous press releases and despite...
Click to read more »request MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki spam, see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Çelebicihan/Archive and...
Click to read more »as merging. Delete Not notable, the search results are flooded with SEO spam so it's difficult to see whether there are any reliable, independent sources...
Click to read more »play. The USA Today article says it’s paid for by sponsors. Seems like a spam attempt by an UPE. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:50, 14 November 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Undisclosed paid-for spam created by IP sockpuppet of BolsaOObsequios, see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet...
Click to read more »reason: Fails WP:GNG, Also author is created this for advertising by adding a spam link like breakingmovied.blogspot.com. 🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN (💬) 17:51, 28 October...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Quick delete Papa2004 spam, creator blocked on en.wp as a Papa2004 sockpuppet. MER-C (talk) 17:23, 7...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam by BolsaOObsequios (see w:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BolsaOObsequios)...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Undisclosed paid-for spam supported by only fake news black hat SEO sources and the usual advertorials...
Click to read more »there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete: Spam by a globally locked user. MarioGom (talk) 08:34, 24 September 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »now. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:22, 20 January 2020 (UTC) Russian IPs have been spamming talk pages for the past few days. The comments seem to be random, and the...
Click to read more »