Redirect to:
page to make sure that other editors agree with any big changes. Shortcuts: WP:BOLDWP:BOLD WP: BE BOLDWP: BE BOLD WP:SOFIXITWP:SOFIXIT WP:FIXITWP:FIXIT...
Click to read more »template. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:33, 4 September 2009 (UTC) Template:Sofixit (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) Either way (talk)...
Click to read more »TheAE talk 23:14, 10 January 2009 (UTC) Well then thats a case of WP:SOFIXIT. Nominators have the responsibility of atleast doing a cursory look for...
Click to read more »Speedy keep: Three links are no longer red. A brilliant example of {{sofixit}}. Goblin 18:53, 9 September 2013 (UTC) I ♥ Chenzw! Keep:- Now that it's...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep BEBOLD and SOFIXIT applies, Why not fix the issues you've mentioned? or better yet look on...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep BEBOLD and SOFIXIT applies, Why not fix the issues you've mentioned? or better yet look on...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep BEBOLD and SOFIXIT applies, Why not fix the issues you've mentioned? or better yet look on...
Click to read more »Keep - Speedy Keep as another blind nomination by this editor. BEBOLD and SOFIXIT apply. –Davey2010Talk 01:47, 15 November 2024 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »00:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Keep - Exists at en:One Thing Remains. en:WP:SOFIXIT. –Davey2010Talk 14:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC) Keep - It doesn't fail WP:GNG...
Click to read more »Dream Indigo ✩ 20:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Keep per Dream - BEBOLD and SOFIXIT applies, I'm sure there's sources out there confirming this for those respective...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep BEBOLD and SOFIXIT applies, Why not fix the issues you've mentioned? or better yet look on...
Click to read more »given for deletion, User:Cactus0rme please read en:WP:BEBOLD and en:WP:SOFIXIT, It makes no sense sending it here on the basis of "it's in an unencyclopedic...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep BEBOLD and SOFIXIT applies, Why not fix the issues you've mentioned? or better yet look on...
Click to read more »fixed. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC) Keep I'd argue SOFIXIT applies to this page, since it isn't in a horrendus state where TNT would...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep BEBOLD and SOFIXIT applies, Why not fix the issues you've mentioned? or better yet look on...
Click to read more »delete it. RiggedMint 14:32, 1 November 2024 (UTC) Keep per Mint, WP:SOFIXIT applies. Article needs expanding not deleting. No valid reason for deletion...
Click to read more »BlackWidowMovie0 (talk) 00:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC) Keep Simple case of WP:SOFIXIT. Subject is notable, simply being a stub is not a reason to delete, many...
Click to read more »QD and not complex enough for here, Respectfully en:WP:BEBOLD and en:WP:SOFIXIT applies, –Davey2010Talk 15:26, 5 August 2024 (UTC) Again, I spend like...
Click to read more »per Shoot. Yeah I'm baffled by this nomination too if I'm honest - en:WP:SOFIXIT applies and Russavia created the article in 2012 and was indeffed on 2015...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep: WP:SOFIXIT. I just do not understand. The article has meaning, it has wikilinks and...
Click to read more »what should and shouldn't be on this project ?, en:WP:BEBOLD and en:WP:SOFIXIT apply. I've sourced and expanded the article a little bit. Also exists...
Click to read more »well. Thetree284 (talk) 22:56, 21 October 2024 (UTC) Keep per above, SOFIXIT applies. Article needs expanding not deleting. --–Davey2010Talk 16:55,...
Click to read more »the !voting period, then delete it however (and before anyone waves {{sofixit}} I will have a look later...) BG7even 09:06, 20 January 2009 (UTC) Speedily...
Click to read more »wiki copypaste. Just make it a stub for now, and before anyone waves {{sofixit}} at me, i'll do it later ;) BG7even 10:52, 12 January 2009 (UTC) Fix and...
Click to read more »them. If the articles don't mention the Permadeath thing then that's a SOFIXIT problem, in short I'm not seeing a compelling reason to delete so keep...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep BEBOLD and SOFIXIT applies, Why not fix the issues you've mentioned? or better yet look on...
Click to read more »this would be a waste of time, Whilst I agree in some respects this DR is SOFIXIT Simple is a very small project and one of the articles have been here for...
Click to read more »such as WP:SOFIXIT would suggest people who find problems, — This unsigned comment was added by Purplebackpack89 (talk • changes). SOFIXIT is a guideline...
Click to read more »information is not useful. How is basic geographical information not useful? WP:SOFIXIT then. Like I have said before, not everything needs a citation. If it's...
Click to read more »have gone without activity. And to quote Pete's favourite template... {{sofixit}}. Goblin 21:36, 2 March 2009 (UTC) Thank you for your suggestion. When...
Click to read more »honestly it's hash right now. Purplebackpack89 01:04, 12 June 2010 (UTC) {{sofixit}} Lauryn Ashby (talk) 01:16, 12 June 2010 (UTC) I did for today's matches...
Click to read more »articles can be more readily RfD'd for, without getting responses such as "{{sofixit}}" and the like (yes, I know this is all slightly hypocritical). Perhaps...
Click to read more »May 2010 (UTC) Template talk:ec PiRSquared17 02:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC) WP:SOFIXIT -DJSasso (talk) 13:42, 6 May 2010 (UTC) Oppose edit conflict is more informative...
Click to read more »regular intervals. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:45, 22 December 2010 (UTC) Sofixit. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 15:59, 22 December 2010 (UTC) So I did: thanks...
Click to read more »and won't take too long to fix. Others are more concerning. I can see SOFIXIT being thrown around in response, but it is our collective responsibility...
Click to read more »its current condition. -DJSasso (talk) 17:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC) en:WP:SOFIXIT then ...... As I have said the length is an issue however I'm all ears...
Click to read more »that is unrealistic currently (and unless I mention it now, I can see 'sofixit' coming...), and that the best option would be to group the stubs. Yottie...
Click to read more »Juliancolton at the moment as that's probably the greatest example I have. {{sofixit}} isn't a policy - it's not even a guideline. If you nominate something...
Click to read more »notice about derivation in the edit wondow. That would be better than {{sofixit}} as you suggest. Kindly, Jon@talk:~$ 00:13, 11 July 2011 (UTC) Could an...
Click to read more »deletion/Requests/2009/Template:Protected Requests for deletion/Requests/2009/Template:Sofixit Requests for deletion/Requests/2009/Template:South Africa Squad 2002 World...
Click to read more »references 6-9. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 01:30, 6 November 2010 (UTC) {{sofixit}}? They should all be easy enough to find, particularly access dates, and...
Click to read more »you should be the change you need. See this essay on it on enwiki - W:WP:SOFIXIT. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:55, 9 July 2024 (UTC) Many languages...
Click to read more »