Redirect to:
Shortcuts WP:RFPWP:RFP WP:RFAWP:RFA WP:RFBWP:RFB Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary...
Click to read more »Aurafish (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfa · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks) I am requesting the patroller permission. I have more...
Click to read more »Axolitl (talk · contribs · count) Rollbacker (and other things) on English Wikipedia. I'm pretty knowledgeable on using Twinkle and warning people properly...
Click to read more »second edit here making it 1/2 an RfA for User:Example (who is banned with 5 edits).. It was never added to the RfP page in the first place (likely because...
Click to read more »FNAFPUPPETMASTER (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions) Reopening of failed RfP, but now with more experience. In seriousness, I've been working on being...
Click to read more »Arctic Kangaroo (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions) I have rollback rights on English Wikipedia, where my main focus is on. I usually help rvv...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Delete. --Ferien (talk) 21:38, 24 June 2023 (UTC) P A H M E A (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close...
Click to read more »the wiki running, and that includes taking part in more mopping (closing RfA's and approving bots, for example). I meet our new policy for cratship and...
Click to read more »flag, since he used to be one and the majority of my concerns at his last RfP was exclusive to that specific group, rather than him as an editor.- FusionSub...
Click to read more »haven't edited as an IP before (apart from the time I forgot to log in a RfA) but only until a bit over a year ago I 'discovered' you can edit and create...
Click to read more »the person, but the fact that only the first request needs to go through RFP indicates to me that its for the latter. Either way, I support giving Creol...
Click to read more »(UTC) I would like to use the crat tools. I'm very interested in working RFP and the BOTS page when I'm able. I have the ability to make sound judgement...
Click to read more »positive impact on the wiki. He has over 200 quick deletion requests, about 30 ViP reports, and in addition he also alerts administrators to users that need...
Click to read more »possibly feed the trolls, neither can you restore a page deleted after an RfD. It is in such situations that I'll take it to AN. In general, yes, it is...
Click to read more »not now :P --Gwib -(talk)- 14:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC) Support - When I saw you had run, I thought it was just another failed (maybe SNOWing) RfA. But you...
Click to read more »retained in the page history of ViP, so what is the point? Because it saves a few clicks when finding out ViP reports for RfAs? Puh-lease. Just go to the page...
Click to read more »nearly 200(!) QDs and several reverts. Apart from this, she is also active in RfD. She has also requested several admin actions through IRC. I am sure that...
Click to read more »the intelligence. Malinaccier P. (talk) 17:18, 27 October 2008 (UTC) Support Took a while to work out my position on this RfA. The opposes are convincing;...
Click to read more »our activity levels from a few months ago, when we frequently had 5 or 6 P(V)GAs at the relevant page - as I write this we have 1 PVGA and 2 PGAs. I've...
Click to read more »watchlist when using Twinkle's RfD module. For more information, check the settings panel. No userspace log feature is in RfD, because deletion talk pages...
Click to read more »Rf Type of RfP is unable to be calculated. Is this a subpage of an RfX? of Hoots global contribs · pie chart · edit count · list user · blocklog ·contribs...
Click to read more ») I'm just curious if there's something you have an interest in (RfDs, NPP, RC, RfRB) or if you just want to mop the mess. EhJJTALK 02:53, 7 April 2009...
Click to read more »improved quite a bit since his last RfA, and he has expanded his work in several areas, just enough for another chance at RfA. Shappy has been participating...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:RFPWP:RFP WP:RFAWP:RFA WP:RFBWP:RFB Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary...
Click to read more »are related to the SPL. He also comments on community discussion boards and RfDs where he is knowledgeable and constructive. I think Kennedy would be a good...
Click to read more »nominations. Bsadowski1 has only nominated one article for RfD and never voted on any other RfDs. Just some numbers that may be of interest to those discussing/voting...
Click to read more »--Auntof6 (talk) 03:58, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Co-nomination by Chenzw: Our RfP archives go back at least 8 years. Broadly speaking, where it comes to candidate...
Click to read more »spelt artical. The fact that you got confused (shown here) about whether this RfA ends on May 36 or May 33 is also very scary. -- Creol(talk) 00:42, 27 May...
Click to read more »I am therefore deleting this--Eptalon (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC) P. V. Vanaja Bai (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close...
Click to read more »this/last year. I think he has matured since this/last year and his last RfA. Our project will surely benefit from him if we give him the mop back. Good...
Click to read more »demonstrated extreme amounts of self-control and patience as is evident in my last RfA when both me and Djsasso went off the deep end in the Comments section. This...
Click to read more »have said, "I don't agree with you" but no, he says it's "pathetic" that RF failed. This is not the kind of behavior or attitude I expect, nor do I want...
Click to read more »19:54, 29 January 2009 (UTC) That's correct, per what I said at the other RfCU. :p PeterSymonds (talk) 19:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC) What I'd like to see from...
Click to read more »request for IPBE the current method of either asking an admin or asking on RfP/AN makes sense. We should write our own policy and post it locaally. What...
Click to read more »merging. Delete on the basis of notability. Eptalon, deletion is not cleanup. RfD's are to decide whether the subject of an article is notable, not whether...
Click to read more »delete but a QD is probably a better option, that I would have done before a RfD personally... Snow close anyone? BG7even 12:36, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Done...
Click to read more »O P O Q O R O S O T O U O V O W O X O Y O Z P A P B P C P D P E P F P G P H P I P J P K P L P M P N P O P P P Q P R P S P T P U P V P W P X P Y P Z Q...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) # Weak support. Alright, when I vote/discuss RfAs, I compare myself at the time of my RfA to them now. I have no problem with trusting you. You've...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage Saroj has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Can any admin archive the done and not done request(s) at WP:RFP? As the consent is already given for a long time. --DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk...
Click to read more »(UTC) I see you are quite active at RfD, so ignore that part of my previous comment, it was just me who didn't notice. :P Kennedy (talk) 09:13, 5 January...
Click to read more »lasted for three weeks, like P(V)GA, when in fact it is only two. This is something that I will be addressing outside of this RfA, and IMO it's an easy mistake...
Click to read more »There are almost zero edits to the Wikipedia namespace (apart from voting in RfAs), showing a possible lack of understanding of policies and procedures. Working...
Click to read more »the lack of mainspace edits. Cheers, Razorflame 15:34, 23 May 2008 (UTC) RF, I'm a little confused. What do you mean in mainspace? Reverting vandalism...
Click to read more »(UTC) Support Damn it Peter. 1 day after you refuse my nom, you accept his? :P I think that the community must have something against me...i'm joking, for...
Click to read more »shows mostly a contribution to the RfA space. There are a few edits to your editor review (your own), a few reports to ViP, and a request for rollback. There...
Click to read more »or participation with the community (ten user talk page edits before this RfA, and one WP:TALK page edit). Synergy 23:11, 11 October 2008 (UTC) The supports...
Click to read more »would possibly want comments around that area. I am not going to start an RfA based on the given comments to me here regarding adminship; all I would like...
Click to read more »11 May 2009 (UTC) Oh fuck yeah. Damn you Shappy for nomming EVula first. :P --Dylan620 Review me 01:26, 11 May 2009 (UTC) Please remain civil, even if...
Click to read more »me all the different RfA and RfB Notification update templates which provide current information and status on both RfA and RfB. Thanks. TheGeneralUser...
Click to read more »particularly in changing username and flagging bots, while helping out in RFP as well. To be honest, I haven't been very active in the past few months...
Click to read more »12:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC) Weak support Be careful if this RfA passes. Malinaccier P. (talk) 18:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC) Thanks for AGFing. If I feel...
Click to read more »using the extension. I have done blockings of sockpuppets and I did a couple RfCHU's and one turned out to have a sockfarm. I would be willing also to identify...
Click to read more »disregard his age completely and try basing this RfA entirely on his edits. Seems to be where this RfA is going, should be alright... Gwib -(talk)- 23:18...
Click to read more »review page to avoid having RfA being used as a Editior Review. Before we know it, we may have people with 1 edit running for RfA, and then see them restore...
Click to read more »Wikipedia better with them. There has been a freqent backlog at RfD, and I have closed the RfD's in the past. However, since I am not an admin, I cannot delete...
Click to read more »Techman224Talk 03:01, 15 March 2009 (UTC) Q:"When is it okay to close an RfD discussion that you have taken part in?" fr33kman talk 02:40, 15 March 2009...
Click to read more »the user who created it keeps removing the RfD tag. The comparison may be able to get it QD as recreated RfD and bypass this issue. If so. salting may...
Click to read more »him w/o his permission or his willingness to run a RfA at the time. I decided to let him run his RfA on his own so that he would feel sure when he felt...
Click to read more »active as I once was, I am requesting the tools back again. I'm not doing RfA because I don't remember such occurrences being controversial in the past...
Click to read more »have a small userbase, would it be worth creating UT:G, UT:RM, UT:RC, UT:RF, UT:M etc? I use the watchlist notifier, and have to manually type in the...
Click to read more »opposed to making a request and hoping that an admin happens to notice the RfP page pop up. Just some thoughts. ···Katerenka (討論) 20:45, 23 December 2009...
Click to read more »-Djsasso (talk) 17:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC) I think it should be 60% for RfAs, 80% for RfBs, OS and CU. Pmlineditor 17:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC) I think we should...
Click to read more »bureaucrat. I can only see him excelling working with bot flags, renames, and RfXs. Shappy talk 19:52, 14 July 2009 (UTC) Co-nomination by Goblin 19:56, 14...
Click to read more »suggest such a thing again, but it would probably look like sour grapes :P As promised, I nominate Gwib: he has been a Wikipedian since early 2007, and...
Click to read more »It also wouldn't hurt to have a bureaucrat in the Americas who would close RfXs when Eptalon, TRM or Vector are asleep or when Chenzw is at school. :-)...
Click to read more »Best of luck, I'm sure you'll regain the trust that you got in your first RfA ;) - Æåm Fætsøn /ˈaɪæm ˈfætsən/ 13:33, 16 April 2009 (UTC) #Three months...
Click to read more »to the "too many admins" way of thought, but cannot abstain/oppose in this RfA simply for that. Sonia's contributions are great, her answers good, and I...
Click to read more »171.16 (talk) 21:38, 30 January 2012 (UTC) I was going to unprotect the Rfp page...but it used to get heavily vandalized so I couldn't decide what was...
Click to read more »submitting their articles to P(V)GA, receiving reviews there (even if their article does not pass) and then running the article through P(V)GA again when edits...
Click to read more »simple English, and a quick look at the history reveals it was simply a C&P job from EN, after which the only main edits have been the addition of interwiki...
Click to read more »editor. StevenJ81 (talk) 17:04, 24 March 2017 (UTC) Sorry about going to RfD rather than reverting and warning. — Jeff G. ツ 00:36, 25 March 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »maybe a week, but two days? Sorry. EhJJTALK 21:46, 21 April 2009 (UTC) This RfA closes in 6 days. As long as your edits continue to be as good as they've...
Click to read more »candidate. --Creol(talk) 07:14, 28 January 2009 (UTC) Thanks for the offer, RF, but I'll probably leave it for now. Majorly talk 04:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »main page", shortly after I started this RfA, I was looking at the RFP page, and I just realised that Lugia's RfA was there, while mine was not. Just when...
Click to read more »and all work now centres around permission requests of some kind, be it RfP or bot/IA work. We don't get that many of those types of requests, so generally...
Click to read more »have rollback bit yet. If you still don't know, you can apply for that at RFP without you being an admin. --Cohaf (talk) 05:27, 14 January 2019 (UTC) Rollback...
Click to read more »in the middle of it we've seen non-admin behaviour from RF, regardless of how you look at it. RF has admitted to biting newbies, claiming ownership and...
Click to read more »that any WMF-wide editor can show up and take part in anything (except a RFP election that began before they got here). Simple WP welcomes anyone, including...
Click to read more »should be granted upon community approval, with a bureaucrat closing any such RfP and granting the right itself. The issue of how long the right should stay...
Click to read more »rollback (ref: Special:Diff/6968689), as well as similar language in their RfP as compared to the text on User:CatBot20. Chenzw Talk 14:16, 3 June 2020...
Click to read more »better fight vandalism here on the Simple English Wikipedia by closing ViP reports and doing that final step, blocking users after all other options...
Click to read more »and can be requested in the same way as Rollback on a special subpage of RfP. The requirements for the right should basically be "Is a trusted content...
Click to read more »months, you should be ready for an RfA if you take what I said above and run with it. A recommendation about having an RfA: I would recommend that you wait...
Click to read more »users who are applying for the mop to wait at least 3 months before making an RfA, and that is with all of the above. I would like to see a couple of things...
Click to read more »recently, and I've created numerous articles. I also regularly contribute to RfA, PGA, and PVGA. I only have about 600 750 edits, although I do have three...
Click to read more »mistakes earlier on (he's been here since May 21, 2008), but were corrected (RfD tags instead of QD tags) and he has about 30 QD's, most of which were in...
Click to read more »I think we should use subpages for RfD threads, which are then transcluded on the main RfD page (like on the English Wikipedia). It would make archiving...
Click to read more »Very active. -- Tholly 16:03, 31 October 2008 Support - F**k it, why not! :P Kennedy (talk) 16:08, 31 October 2008 (UTC) - Changing to oppose. Kennedy...
Click to read more »offensive. I belive that the creation of these odd RfA (for me) was the revenge for my notes on the RfA's here and here. It is just a feeling. Other thoughts...
Click to read more »really need to say. The adminship system and RfAs, at least here, are so pathetic. People keep failing RfAs, getting opposed, for totally false reasons...
Click to read more »archiving warnings? IP ranges can change, usernames don't. And yes, dirty word. :P ;) BGTHAT'S NUMBERWANG! 14:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC) When I am trying to make...
Click to read more »there because I got the data from the list of current administrators & recent RfAs. Kennedy's on there twice, but it's not possible to remove him as he's now...
Click to read more »use WP:RfA? Kennedy (talk) 14:06, 20 October 2008 (UTC) Strike that, actually ST or admins talk pages is probably better because of the way WP:RfA is set...
Click to read more »2021 (UTC) (Non-administrator observation) This should be on WP:VIP and WP:RfP instead Nigos (talk | changes) 13:36, 18 December 2021 (UTC) Accounts: Relayballleague...
Click to read more »again. Weird. I just said log me in globally and now I'm logged in under IanP when I was under Ian.bjorn. Huh. Loudclaw (talk) 03:15, 10 March 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »time to pass and for you to improve from your last RfA. Waiting at least three months between RfAs is what I suggest. And I remember several instances...
Click to read more »19:10, 17 May 2021 (UTC) Gordonrox24 this request isn't transcluded on the RFP page, so should we still vote? --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 23:47, 25 April...
Click to read more »likely backed by sources. Further cleanup is not something to be discussed at RfD.--Eptalon (talk) 23:40, 18 April 2022 (UTC) Winona, Missouri (edit · talk...
Click to read more »exact reason I don't bother mentioning any of my off-line facts when I run an RfA or anything else. That does not mean, however, that they aren't relevant...
Click to read more »tweak to the RfA page (which ECed me, grr :P), and I made the Request for Oversightship redirect so that the subpages behave just like RfA and RfB subpages...
Click to read more »Creol! Malinaccier (talk) 00:49, 30 October 2008 (UTC) If only an RfA were this simple... :P Kennedy (talk) 09:01, 30 October 2008 (UTC) I'd like to request...
Click to read more »@Djsasso: You probably meant we should consider removing importer from WP:RFP since it is highly unlikely to be given out. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk)...
Click to read more »could you semi-protect User:Fixing26/RfDs, User:Fixing26/RfDs/Nominated, User:Fixing26/RfDs/Delete, User:Fixing26/RfDs/Other? Fixing26 (talk) 15:25, 4 August...
Click to read more »flag. It's not really a big deal, and we would still run requests at WP:RFP so the whole community can take part and comment. fr33kman 14:59, 26 February...
Click to read more »you can. Belle tête-à-tête 06:29, 6 May 2010 (UTC) Looks like the RfA had the Rfp in progress Template in it. And that has a noinclude for the Category:Current...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage Fishsicles has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This...
Click to read more »–Juliancolton | Talk 20:23, 29 March 2009 (UTC) TRM on tour, I know (I´m not that blind :p), but still. Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 20:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC) Alright...
Click to read more »October 2021 (UTC) This was not a live request, because it wasn't added to the RFP page. So, no, there was no reason to close it (nor to vote, either). Auntof6...
Click to read more »selectors have been changed. div#p-personal, div#p-navigation, div#p-interaction, div#p-tb, div#p-lang, div#p-namespaces or div#p-variants are now all removed...
Click to read more »has basically every discussion page. We only have 6 to begin with. AN/ST/RfP/RfD/PVA.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 18:53, 29 May 2021 (UTC) @Gordonrox24: I am very...
Click to read more »June 2010 (UTC) It's always been my understanding that support !votes in RfAs carry an understood "per nom". Perhaps OtW agrees with fr33kman's statement...
Click to read more »over a year as admin at en.) -Djsasso (talk) 15:11, 5 February 2009 (UTC) RF: there's no "can't", I could run if I wanted to, I just choose not to. Majorly...
Click to read more »responded user reported VIP reports per a determined duration? Archiving RFPs?--Cohaf (talk) 05:53, 21 February 2019 (UTC) ChenzwBot already does that...
Click to read more »give any weight to comments along the lines of "we don't need more X" at RFPs. However, I do take Ferien's concerns seriously, and it makes me hesitant...
Click to read more »already been twice deleted, including an RfD discussion. This is one reason we ended up with a huge list of RfD items. RfD is for decisions which need discussion...
Click to read more »considering you told me I had to open this and it runs like any other major RfP. That is also why I stated that I would continue to copy/paste smaller ones...
Click to read more »considering you told me I had to open this and it runs like any other major RfP. That is also why I stated that I would continue to copy/paste smaller ones...
Click to read more »Since the RfDs are archived by year, I propose that we make a rush and close all RfDs i such a way that on years end (UTC), there are no open RfDs. Else...
Click to read more »edits to VIP which isn't bad; however, you have hardly any participation in RfD, Simple Talk or AN where I expect participation from prospective admins....
Click to read more »support or oppose the suggestion. It is pretty much a vote, but, like the RfD discussions, the outcome could be overruled by 'crats if it conflicts with...
Click to read more »That being said, I would support you in a WP:RfA for DYK. I highly doubt that you would vandalise :P That being said, I don't think that DYK needs to...
Click to read more »tag them for QD or have a RfD on the Category page (for all pages in that category). This is the wrong place to have a RfD discussion. EhJJTALK 19:50...
Click to read more »big English terms being used :P) Perhaps if not a QD criteria it could be something that articles can be more readily RfD'd for, without getting responses...
Click to read more »2008 three people like me around the one thousand edits mark failed their RfA) and that's why I'm asking the community not to vote now but first to take...
Click to read more »do not see any reason to use it. When I archived the last batch of closed RfD's I archived the original content from the edit prior to the result template...
Click to read more »11:26, 13 December 2008 (UTC) :O You stole mine and/or Kennedy's thunder! :P Yep, the plan was always to move it after this issue anyway, I was just going...
Click to read more »Hello all, I just added the four "missing" RfDs (which were neither closed, nor listed as "in progress") to our RfD page. Currently, I dpn't know the reason...
Click to read more »way in reality. RfAs are very poisonous at times, my recent one is an excellent example. If we redirected ER to RfA we'd have to make RfA... easier, for...
Click to read more »October 2008 (UTC) Oppose voting. But Support TOTD Sorry for confusing vote :P Kennedy (talk) 20:51, 23 October 2008 (UTC) Support OK. Shapiros10 Flap the...
Click to read more »I say make the best of your time there. Have some fun. Participate in an RfC. If you make fifteen edits a day or so, you'll hit 500 in almost exactly...
Click to read more »rollback feature (which administrators can grant)." be changed to "See WP:RFP to request additional permissions (which administrators can grant). rollingbarrels...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment: Please don't move the page while this RfD is in progress, as it will break the RfD.--Eptalon (talk) 23:02, 25 December 2022 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:...
Click to read more »Having more than one account is no problem, as long as you don't vote (in RFP) with both accounts. If you prefer to use this account here, and the other...
Click to read more »New users would easily confuse which is the appropriate one to use. Having RfD and MfD just adds unnecessary bureaucracy. EhJJ (talk) 02:05, 5 March 2009...
Click to read more »single RfA/B a hughe discussion since any crat has an other opinion about what consensus is. Just look at the huge discussion about Clementina's RfA. -Barras...
Click to read more »community supports his RfA because they trust him to be an admin. While I'm not against your reason on your opposition to Gwib's RfA, I mean RfAs merely test a...
Click to read more »come here because they know the article will last at least 7 days while we RfD. If the account is already blocked, or later locked by a Steward, these should...
Click to read more »rights because I am not very sure about the intentions. He just failed an RfA, and he asked why I have import rights on my talk page a few hours before...
Click to read more »a new RfD, if you want. Barras (talk) 10:49, 9 July 2009 (UTC) I'll manually remove them if consensus is reached to remove and then perhaps RfD. Pmlineditor...
Click to read more »nom me for RFA and I'm assuming they talked and luseRosary decided to nom RF for RFA. You probably knew all this but honestly, this is getting annoying...
Click to read more »discussion) --Tbennert (talk) 15:54, 10 October 2017 (UTC) You could make a group RfD request, or maybe just list the questionable ones here to save everyone else...
Click to read more »instructions, since I observe that you yourself have decided to remove the {{rfp in progress}} template from this page. Chenzw Talk 15:21, 8 February 2014...
Click to read more »avoid the time-wasting that comes with the frivolous requests we get at RFP by just giving it out on request (at WP:AN or wherever) and then removing...
Click to read more »favour of a fixed 14 day request duration, with the clarification that if an RFP does not meet the minimum number of support votes at the end of the 14th...
Click to read more »be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Comment: The RfD template was added to the article by an unregistered user, but they didn't...
Click to read more »word our policy on granting rollback is inconsistent between WP:RFP and WP:RBK: WP:RFP: "Once autoconfirmed, admins/rollbackers from other projects can...
Click to read more »(UTC) I Just put in a little donation, as I care and want you to get paid :P --Gordonrox24 | Talk 20:41, 26 October 2010 (UTC) We all appreciate it Gordon ;)...
Click to read more »(Synergy's efforts are, tbh, pathetic :P ;) ) I will. BG7even 15:13, 29 December 2008 (UTC) See what I did there...? :P Kennedy (talk) 15:18, 29 December 2008...
Click to read more »create a new request, you should not be removing the old request from the RFP page. There is nothing stopping a page from having the same section header...
Click to read more »wikia....another impersonation...who I don't know but it caused me to fail an RfA. And cause of it I'm failing my current one, but this time it's because it's...
Click to read more »Razor, but that was a burn. Ouch.-- † CM16 06:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC) RF, no need to threaten like this, but people seem to be missing your point....
Click to read more »back the delivery date. Please help out if you can, write an article, update RfX news etc. Thanks Kennedy (talk) 10:48, 16 April 2009 (UTC) Also have a look...
Click to read more »Okay!) 06:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC) Oppose witch bureaucrats are not active? :P I'm active too :-) Good candidate. for me we could close here. --vector ^_^...
Click to read more »particularly strange because other RfDs so far have not run into this issue. Twinkle uses exactly the same preload template for new RfD pages. Chenzw Talk 02:43...
Click to read more »run a reconfirmation RfA. They are not necessary. Kennedy (talk) 13:02, 31 January 2009 (UTC) Support - You are soo Damn Clever :p ...--Cometstyles 13:11...
Click to read more »forward RFA, please see special:permalink/9491679#Transitions_between_RFRR_and_RFP for this discussion. Today, I have restored auto-patrol via global rollback...
Click to read more »Yes, but the only person who actually criticized him seriously was you. :p Belinda and I just complimented him, and nobody else commented. I think he...
Click to read more »really going to be much of a problem, as many of them are used on RfD only. As I said on RfA, these templates are supposed to make things easier to read I...
Click to read more »I think we should start up WP:RFPP/WP:RFP. MathCool10 05:46, 17 February 2009 (UTC) BTW, can someone fully-protect (or at least semi-protect) {{-}}? It...
Click to read more »--TBCΦtalk? 03:02, 14 October 2006 (UTC) Instead of simply deleting old RfD nominations, should we archive them? After all, this way it would be easier...
Click to read more »"article issue", its best to translate the article as it is asked for at WP:P(V)GA projects and a lot of people who are English speakers might not understand...
Click to read more »September 2008 (UTC) Cool, will clean up in the next 24hrs. Probably will C&P 65% and ground up 25% and then just create redirects and "wikignome" other...
Click to read more »is no reopening needed. Barras (talk) 16:23, 14 May 2009 (UTC) Agree with RF and Barras. No need to drag out old drama for no reason. Majorly talk 16:26...
Click to read more »Yeah, I don't think we have an acronym for this specific right, not like RFP for patroller, etc. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:37, 19 July 2022 (UTC) @Auntof6 So...
Click to read more »the discussion here has been derailed sufficiently to the point that this RfD should be reconsidered at a later time. Chenzw Talk 05:11, 29 June 2019...
Click to read more »retirement. Mythdon (talk • changes) 01:36, 31 August 2009 (UTC) Good luck RF. Everyone else, I encourage you to Take the pledge. Very respectfully, NonvocalScream...
Click to read more »currently have an RfD about a few categoiies (people, by occupation, mostly), where there are separate categories for men and women. In this RfD it became obvious...
Click to read more »was promoted to bureaucrat and Fr33kman and Claimgoal currently have open RfAs (this is not canvassing). I would suggest you read up the Simple talk, Administrator's...
Click to read more »posted this thread (6 Feb) both of those categories were full of something (RFP had Bluegoblin7's RFA and the QD cat was full of Racepacket's articles)....
Click to read more »Permissions forms, and as Auntof6 Mentioned, to not place an RFA on the RFP Page, of course you were not aware of this rule, so don't sweat it, now you...
Click to read more »keep the Simple English Wikipedia afloat, as Archer7 pointed out in my 5th RfA nomination, but I can't help but feel that I am missing every active user...
Click to read more »you ban me from WP:RfA and talkpages (unless it is about a edit I made)? FRSign Here 15:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC) It is not only RfA and talkpages. It...
Click to read more »a few sentences and thought it had been copy-pasted from ENWP. As for the RfD, I counted votes, calculated there was about 55 - 60% support for deletion...
Click to read more »accepted shortened form of it). This can be found in the second archive of the RfD page. The subject was later brought up by Huji dealing with the naming convention...
Click to read more »over 10 times more edits than me, and I think it would only be better if RF was an admin too. Majorly (talk) 21:36, 6 April 2008 (UTC)Switching to oppose...
Click to read more »header section on that page as it made it unreadable for me. The entire first RfD and part of the second got squeezed into just a small column. It is better...
Click to read more »opinions? -- Eptalon 02:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC) I strongly agree. I think a RfD discussion right now is also having a little bit of sockpuppetry going on...
Click to read more »you in an RfA. –Juliancolton | Talk 20:09, 9 July 2009 (UTC) It seems clear that he resigned under a cloud and should therefore have a new RfA. Even if...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:04, 22 September 2018 (UTC) And now they're messing with RfD pages and posting RfD notifications to talk pages of inactive users. I'm going to warn...
Click to read more »2000 edits announced at start of RfA - it is easy to check and that was around 800 more than you had. In an earlier RfA there was a similar situation with...
Click to read more »Just saying, when will the testing period be over? I'll be happy to rename RfD to AfD and fix Wikipedia:Deletion policy to include AfD and MfD, if necessary...
Click to read more »November 2008 (UTC) Keep - VIP are one of the most linked-to pages from RfAs and such. They should be kept not only to record vandalism history, but...
Click to read more »enwiki code, note down things and text we want to change in simple talk(prod > RfD, simplify warning messages, remove stub templates that aren't used here etc)...
Click to read more »would be a good icon. @Bluegoblin7: WP:BOLD. Go ahead and make one yourself :P. Surprise us! Razorflame 23:43, 26 March 2009 (UTC) I was demonstrating that...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Uh... Bella, I RfDed it already, and I believe Hydriz was the creator. sonia♫ 10:36, 9 October 2010 (UTC) Oh, okay. :P Belle tête-à-tête 10:50...
Click to read more »them.. Darkfrog24 (talk) 00:09, 15 July 2021 (UTC) Hello everyone, Ferien's RfA was successful. There was no opposition, so I promoted him to Admin earlier...
Click to read more »from yourself. Be advised that being a rabble-rouser, such as your current RfD request, will only bring increased scrutiny upon yourself. - BrownE34 talk contribs ...
Click to read more »Jon@talk:~$ 21:16, 11 June 2010 (UTC) Yes. See above (if that's what you mean). :P {{Sonia|talk|en}} 22:34, 11 June 2010 (UTC) 2010 FIFA World Cup (change ·...
Click to read more »January 2021 (UTC) @Djsasso: Can you link it? My method was going onto WP:RFP and Ctrl+F'ing the history for "removal of rights". So it might not have...
Click to read more »so I don't do them again in the future. Thanks GhostP. talk 02:09, 26 October 2020 (UTC) Hi GhostP.. The article was great, just a little bit of simplifying...
Click to read more »in the article history. Why can't we just revert to that and remove the C&P version? Either way (talk) 20:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC) Because Norton AntiVirus...
Click to read more »the block.Jasper Deng (talk) 01:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC) I unprotected RFP earlier because it had long term protection applied that was no longer needed...
Click to read more »commander=17:34, 12 January 2009 (UTC) This is precisely why I didn't vote in your RfA Yot. I didn't see a need for the tools. In fact, I still don't really. I've...
Click to read more »left the article restored and taken it to RfD.. It is well known that consensus can change, and a 2-3 year old RfD on what may potentially be a completely...
Click to read more »will mention the issue on IanP's talk page and see if he will move the page back to the Main space himself so that the RfD can assume unhindered - if not...
Click to read more »days ago, when I tried to see how my RfA was doing, I hadn't logged in yet, and it wouldn't show me the current RfAs. Is there a reason why I couldn't...
Click to read more »IPs... never mind me then. Without any proof of abuse (double vote in RfXs, RfDs etc), there is no need for a check. I just want to remember, that it...
Click to read more »December 2011 (UTC) It would likely be the same as the hide feature on the RfD page (and several others) that most people do not even know exists. 70.184...
Click to read more »change, they may be automatically deleted without discussion or proposal at RfD. · Tygrrr·talk· 19:58, 8 September 2007 (UTC) Also, Phaedriel, I think you...
Click to read more »here are 1 (template)-2 (template and doc) pages at a time. To require an RfP, waiting, getting approved, getting a Crat to flag, moving the page over...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Strong Support - so that he will stop telling me to delete stuff :p....--Cometstyles 22:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC) Support - I think he'll do fine...
Click to read more »emails but you never replied. :p Aww, thank you both. :) I appreciate the kind words. (also, I'll get to work on those emails..:p). Cheers, Lauryn☆ 05:41, 10...
Click to read more »been interpted as was that a article we have on this Wikipedia and has not RfD'd had less hits on Google than a Pokemon. That pretty much is what Creol...
Click to read more »translator), in Moïse (Flammarion, Paris, 1997, p.47), Arduini & Pizzorni, La Bibbia prima del dogma (Aracne ed. 2018, p.83, 146) ; another mention can be found...
Click to read more »please close the RfD at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2014/Categories showing mixes of national ancestry? Assuming the RfD succeeds, I am willing...
Click to read more »article on the english Wikipedia is for a novel by the same name. Malinaccier P. (talk) 18:18, 12 January 2009 (UTC) Delete as per WP:NOT. Razorflame 19:22...
Click to read more »25 November 2010 (UTC) I wonder if you'd realized that RfI goes on its own subpage just like a RfA? Also this is surely the wrong place to request imports...
Click to read more »reason for these, you enter the page name of the RfD in brackets, so that it gives a link to the RfD. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:40, 1 January 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »19 June 2017 (UTC) I don't think this is the ideal place to put this, but RFP doesn't have a category for these requests. Can someone please grant my account...
Click to read more »the first person to really deserve it since I supported American Eagle's RfA. I think she would make a great admin. That's my statement.-- ✧ CM16 03:48...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage Aurafish has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The...
Click to read more »however that the administrators should pay more attention to places like WP:RFP and Category:Requests for unblock. I often find requests sitting in those...
Click to read more »desperation to have the article kept. Disregarding the votes by these editors, this RfD is closed as deleted - there was a unanimous decision. Chenzw Talk 03:36...
Click to read more »differently here. That's why I prefer to see more experience here before supporting RfAs. Some of the things can be learned by reading the various policies, etc...
Click to read more »United States: Princeton University Press, p. 85.) (note: not sure how I am supposed to offer citations in a RfD, hope this is okay.) At a glance, she is...
Click to read more »to do things, I was just kindly informing so that a Bureaucrat closes the RfA whose time was up. There was really nothing wrong in this request. TheGeneralUser...
Click to read more »indefinitely for impersination, in addition to using sockpuppets to influence an RfA. Razorflame 19:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC) Dun. --Gwib -(talk)- 15:53, 28 May 2008...
Click to read more »NonvocalScream (talk) 00:23, 13 August 2009 (UTC) That was the nice answer. :P -DJSasso (talk) 12:17, 13 August 2009 (UTC) This page needs to be unprotected...
Click to read more »have clicked. Thanks, NonvocalScream (talk) 20:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC) P.S. This new fantastic feature will not work if you do not clear your cache...
Click to read more »wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalahari_Desert" would satisfy the GFDL. Aside from this RfA, all those new pages really need clearing up completely. Ryan Postlethwaite...
Click to read more »trying to gain sympathy and show a need for more admins so they can pass RfA. The community deserves to know how they have used open proxies in this way...
Click to read more »certainly be helpful. James (T C) 19:58, 19 August 2010 (UTC) So you want a RfB? I'll think about the admins, and may nominate. Hazard-SJ Talk 20:10, 19...
Click to read more »any of our community processes. It was one of the recommendations in their RfA attempt to try and actually learn about community processes like this so...
Click to read more »Fermium (Fm) Mendelevium (Md) Nobelium (No) Lawrencium (Lr) Rutherfordium (Rf) Dubnium (Db) Seaborgium (Sg) Bohrium (Bh) Hassium (Hs) Meitnerium (Mt) Darmstadtium...
Click to read more »I have an account on en-wikipedia. But looking through the archives of WP:RfA, I don't feel I should nominate myself. It would be better for a trusted...
Click to read more »look at the deleted version of OPTICAL DATA RECORDING? It was deleted by RfD and has now been recreated. If it's the same, it can be deleted under G4...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Redirect to BE wordlist. Everything already there. Malinaccier P. (talk) 18:36, 4 December 2008 (UTC) This request is due to close seven days...
Click to read more »However, I feel that admins should pay more attention to areas such as WP:RFP and Category:Requests for unblock. Sometimes those requests can get backlogged...
Click to read more »copyright violation on ANI. I think that must be addressed prior to this RfP being dealt with. fr33kman 16:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC) Comment: Ip didn't...
Click to read more »notable. I'd prefer someone rewrote this from scratch. Hey, maybe I should! :P Majorly talk 17:18, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Comment: The article is also being...
Click to read more »{{barnstar}}.-- † ChristianMan16 00:06, 24 April 2008 (UTC) Mmmm cookies... :P seriously though, Keep it's a nice alternative to a barnstar. What's the...
Click to read more »around 44 DYKs. I also have created 124 articles and 64 redirects. I passed an RfA in September, and have made around 3k logged actions during that time, including...
Click to read more »2021 (UTC) Yes, socks... If you want to keep, socks aint gonna work here :) (p/a tone). 💠Ely - Talk💠 14:11, 25 September 2021 (UTC) Elytrian, I have removed...
Click to read more »policy for this and add a section to wp:RFP Cactus🌵 hi ツ 09:57, 29 August 2025 (UTC) Concur - add this to RFP so regular patrollers can request this permission...
Click to read more »is doing it to hurt the company, then that is far beyond the scope of an RfD. I also wonder if those are truly sockpuppets or alternatively simply employees...
Click to read more »Sorry - is this nomination for you or for KingRven 44? The template is wrong :P --Addihockey10 e-mail 23:50, 28 February 2011 (UTC) oops, my bad... I fixed...
Click to read more »(talk) 06:59, 25 January 2010 (UTC) Hehe, I am quite in the minority here. :P I'll see if I can expand it and maybe the article can be kept. --cremepuff222...
Click to read more »March 2007 (UTC) - Vote not counted - no other actions except to oppose this RfA Archer7 - talk 18:07, 9 March 2007 (UTC) Note that I do not actively edit...
Click to read more »like making blocks for personal attacks, and I made two in reviewing this RfD. We're here to build a collaborative encyclopedia, not attack other editors...
Click to read more »don't quite have the questions thought out. So is it okay just to wing it? :P [18:28] <forty-haig> Sure. [18:28] <forty-haig> Don't forget to turn logging...
Click to read more »returned today to make a Keep vote at this RfD. Since the other editor (TwelverShii) only cares about the RfD-nominated page, I think they are related...
Click to read more »are not just "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete as OR fancruft :P. Cheers, Razorflame 05:50, 3 April 2009 (UTC) Delete per nom. BGTHAT'S NUMBERWANG...
Click to read more »21:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC) Wow. That makes me glad that I am not an admin :P--Gordonrox24 | Talk 22:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC) Thanks JC. Yotcmdr =talk to...
Click to read more »request the right: administrators can not add the right without a request at RFP. Accounts must be at least 6 months old. Accounts must have at least 300...
Click to read more »acceptance:OMG Vector, I just love the nomination, you should win an award :P ..I humbly Accept...--Cometstyles 00:55, 20 November 2007 (UTC) Support Duh...
Click to read more »obviously not verifiable and I am changing my comment to Delete. Malinaccier P. (talk) 20:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC) Delete In addtion to points made above...
Click to read more »on each of them. -Djsasso (talk) 15:10, 1 June 2009 (UTC) This isn't en. :P Kennedy (talk • changes). (I ♥ MC8) 15:12, 1 June 2009 (UTC) Weak Keep I agree...
Click to read more »the major Norwegian writer Duun) is at https://www.aftenposten.no/kultur/i/pXgX/grethe-f-syed-med-glitrende-bok-om-olav-duun. Kdammers (talk) 02:40, 25...
Click to read more »as nominator. Vermont (talk) 18:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC) Strong support duh :P Naleksuh (talk) 19:01, 11 June 2020 (UTC) Strong support - what else is there...
Click to read more »WP:RFX200 Requests for adminship (RfA) Largest unopposed RfA: DanCherek on 9 August 2022 (281 supports)[dp] Most recent unopposed RfA: ARandomName123 on 15 March...
Click to read more »out of 99 RfDs (or 3 out of 109 RfDs at the time you commented) mentioning AI in the nomination or comments really a reason for so many RfDs? The data...
Click to read more »Regards, Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 17:23, 12 May 2012 (UTC) Shortcut [[:|WP:RFP/P]] He's already been flagged by Eptalon (though I probably would have declined...
Click to read more »Fermium (Fm) Mendelevium (Md) Nobelium (No) Lawrencium (Lr) Rutherfordium (Rf) Dubnium (Db) Seaborgium (Sg) Bohrium (Bh) Hassium (Hs) Meitnerium (Mt) Darmstadtium...
Click to read more »(UTC) I saw some people say that RfDs get closed as delete if there are no votes. Is this written anywhere? Because some RfDs with no votes were recently...
Click to read more »He Get Presidental award from uSA And REven get Excellence medal from USA pOlice Form But We He Isn't That Reliable Like politician as of Indian search...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not paper, so it has no size limit (as of now). Malinaccier P. (talk) 18:35, 20 November 2008 (UTC) This request is due to close seven days...
Click to read more »Cheers, Razorflame 14:59, 20 May 2008 (UTC) Oppose - Just passed a RfGA and failed an RfVGA a week ago. I don't see that enough has changed since then to...
Click to read more »came up, that might be after 3 days. No issues with any of the others – WP:RFP/P and /R need a major overhaul imo as archives typically only contain one...
Click to read more »it would be the last time and they would need to request them again via a RfP on ENWP. While the editor may have had rollback on another wiki, they need...
Click to read more »svwiki we have detected many dead iw-links in RfD-talks. And since many interwiki-links can be an argument in a RfD-talk, such dead links can be deceptive....
Click to read more »Hello all, we do have an RfD backlog of about a week. So, if you are an admin, and don't know what to do, please close some RfDs... Eptalon (talk) 21:32...
Click to read more »would run for a week, and afterwards an independent admin would close the RfD. Dear IP editor, please create an account, if you want to contribute more...
Click to read more »variable of "current year-1" for these half a dozen of RfDs that will be overdue by 1 January? :P --Ferien (talk) 00:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC) I feel super...
Click to read more »2024 (UTC) Depends on how big of a possibility there was for the RfP to fail. An RfP like yours, where it was unanimous? I can see your point. But if...
Click to read more »click RfD and add a reason. The week it sits on the RfD list has no effect on me. I do not close it.. looking at the fact to 18 of the 35 active RfDs are...
Click to read more »vote at RfD soon, I thought we might as well reconsider other parts of RfD. Something that is fairly common, that I have done when closing RfDs since...
Click to read more »Thanks. thetree284 (talk and edits) 20:13, 1 April 2025 (UTC) Moved from RfP. --Ferien2 (talk) 05:50, 2 April 2025 (UTC) @Thetree284 Done — *Fehufangą...
Click to read more »non-controversial deletion". This wasn't "housekeeping" and should have gone through a RfD! Creating a stub sub-type like this is perfectly within "be bold". If there...
Click to read more »Regards, Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 17:23, 12 May 2012 (UTC) Shortcut [[:|WP:RFP/P]] He's already been flagged by Eptalon (though I probably would have declined...
Click to read more »certain users would be given the uploader flag and would have to undergo an RfP type elections. The Fukushima nuclear disaster is a poor article because...
Click to read more »meeting the criteria of being in an RfD. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 05:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC) RfD isn't something a page has to qualify...
Click to read more »Exert 04:37, 25 September 2010 (UTC) Excuse my confusion but doesn't wp:RfP stipulate that: You must be an active member of Simple English Wikipedia...
Click to read more »flag :). Cheers, Razorflame 23:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC) I wasn't done. :P Patience grasshopper. -Djsasso (talk) 23:14, 28 December 2008 (UTC) Test run...
Click to read more »(UTC) @BlackJack: Steps: Create an RfD for one of the pages. Edit the RfD to add the list of additional pages to the new RfD. (Don't add them to one you have...
Click to read more »Ben Shapiro page to be reinstated until such time as rebuttal is offered. (P.S. I in no way wish to impugn the editor who deleted the Shapiro page as the...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Comment: Err, what happened to my reason? I typed in "*{{subst:rfp|Inferno, Lord of Penguins|Already a rollbacker at en-wiki, and the tool may...
Click to read more »IPs... never mind me then. Without any proof of abuse (double vote in RfXs, RfDs etc), there is no need for a check. I just want to remember, that it...
Click to read more »and still have no clue what the subject is. I, talking about at the base pLevel. It is a place, an empire, a concept? I got nothing from the article...
Click to read more »offensive. I belive that the creation of these odd RfA (for me) was the revenge for my notes on the RfA's here and here. It is just a feeling. Other thoughts...
Click to read more »person opening up the RfD - and closing it - deleting the article, is the same person. He also deleted another article with no RfD at all. He also made...
Click to read more »to have it requested at RFP like most flags or at AN like the flood flag? Side note: should flood flag requests be moved to RFP? QuicoleJR (talk) 16:49...
Click to read more »error_039_head_script=HTML text style element <p> (partial AWB) END error_039_desc_script=Article contains a <p>. In most cases we can use simpler wiki markups...
Click to read more »then the right(s) stay in place and they do not need to go through another RfP. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 22:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(UTC) This user created an article that was put up for RfD and was successful. During the RfD, I noticed a couple of things that were off. Upon investigation...
Click to read more »about the length but some vital red links which ought to be blue, and, as RF said, in need of a copyedit. Hopefully my comments will be of use. The Rambling...
Click to read more »& !("confirmed" in user_groups) & added_lines rlike "(?s)^[\p{Ll}\p{P}\s]+$|^[\p{Lu}\p{P}\s]+$" & !(added_lines irlike "^\s*#\s*REDIRECT\s*\[\[|{{(?:db|wi|rfd|qd)")...
Click to read more »you hadn't done so. I see you have been informed before about comments in RFP's being unnecessary. The user subpages can also be vandalized and "no pre-emptive...
Click to read more »Oldrfdfull. BZPN (talk) 13:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC) P.S. I guess there's no need to send Oldrfd to a separate RfD - we can discuss it here, because it's probably...
Click to read more »notability (might not be notable), and the sources are very iffy. Starting a RfD because it seems some people believe the article should be deleted on those...
Click to read more »CharlieEchoTango (talk) 04:36, 1 January 2011 (UTC) Please use the formatting {{subst:rfp|Your Username|Short reason for wanting permission}} . Thanks -- Exert 06:40...
Click to read more »the new Golf: Golf Mk II – a perfected concept". VW Press. 16 October 2019. p. 2. Retrieved 10 April 2024 {{cite web}}: More than one of |pages= and |page=...
Click to read more »discussed at RfD, while not worrying about the article effectively serving as a free promotion for the person, company etc being discussed at RfD. This would...
Click to read more »far as I can see, fails the general notability criteria. I have opened an RfD. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:11, 25 June 2023 (UTC) I have been looking...
Click to read more »you are unaware of simplewiki policies regarding RfDs. We do not have non-admin closures here. All RfDs are closed by admins. fr33kman 22:33, 16 May 2025...
Click to read more »September 2023 (UTC) If you think that the redirect is harmful then bring it to RfD but a link to another project is definitely inappropriate. fr33kman 19:23...
Click to read more »things. Firstly, requests for the user right will have to go through the RFP process like other rights; and secondly it's important to know about restrictions...
Click to read more »links, and perform other general fixes. Running this query for simplewiki_p currently shows 171 articles to be updated (11% of the articles in Category:All...
Click to read more »2409:40F4:A8:2BD9:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 16:39, 20 March 2025 (UTC) @Davey2010 That RfD said "since the entire list of goat breeds is missing it don't really makes...
Click to read more »caused problems on simplewiki (apart from nominating about 7000 articles for RfD :) fr33kman 14:37, 6 July 2025 (UTC) Hollowww (talk · contribs) has made...
Click to read more »