Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following one or more categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Shortcuts WP:AFDWP:AFD WP:RFDWP:RFD WP:XFDWP:XFD WP:VFDWP:VFD If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure. Then follow...
Click to read more »11:53, 5 August 2026 (UTC) This article has now been deleted twice through RFD. You have been given so much feedback on it and it has not been deemed appropriate...
Click to read more »evaluating this RFD, I noted that several of the people who commented have made no edits here except in this RFD, and others only in this RFD and the article...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment: Yeah I realized that when the rfd loaded to the last rfd for this so I replaced the rfd tag with the qd tag. --Hellothere4 (talk) 11:31...
Click to read more »here. If it turns out to be obvuiously non-notable, or advertising, this RfD can be closed early. I do ohwever think we should discuss the issue here...
Click to read more »which has been brought up to RFD many times before.... I'm not sure whether to do a QD or RFD, so I'm going to take this to RFD. Thegooduser Let's Talk! :)...
Click to read more »(contested a4). full delete (g6), partial undelete (the most recent revisions), Rfd, deleted (a4)... what a trip. Pure Evil (talk) 22:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »move because it made the RFD template point to the wrong discussion. In general, please do not move a page that has an open RFD. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk)...
Click to read more »the original page that was nominated. When pages are added to an existing RFD, people who had already looked at it (whether or not they !voted) don't have...
Click to read more »category itself (which will become empty if this RFD is successful). Instead of 20 RFDs, I figured one combined RFD would be the best course of action, since...
Click to read more »commented had made no changes before this RFD was opened, and some had only made changes related to this article and RFD. As is allowed, I gave those comments...
Click to read more »this RFD, and I recuse myself from closing it. @Editoromar9 and Kuskrey: Please do not ask specific people to comment on RFDs, either on the RFD page...
Click to read more »This RFD applies to all articles transcluded on that template since the deletion criteria applies to all of them. I do not see a reason to have 13 RFDs when...
Click to read more »Keep. The article was edited and improved during RFD discussions and most problems were fixed. RFD closed early after nominator withdrew request--Peterdownunder...
Click to read more »Rfd isn't meant to delete articles that are notable but not well written. -Djsasso (talk) 00:15, 21 June 2009 (UTC) Keep Very notable subject. Rfd is...
Click to read more »{{rfd}} - How many deletion templates do we need? --Eptalon (talk) 12:55, 7 September 2008 (UTC) Delete - per above. Much easier to use {{qd}} or {{rfd}}...
Click to read more »contortionist, seems to have gone through an RfD long ago. Contested quick deletion. I therefore propose we do a regular RfD. Eptalon (talk) 11:34, 25 February...
Click to read more »support your election to another position of trust and responsibility. Your RFD of Steve McLarin is a recent case in point. Whilst I fully understand your...
Click to read more »option, isn't RFD consensus to not categorise occupations by gender? Griff (talk) 10:07, 3 April 2022 (UTC) Comment: There already was an RfD, about half...
Click to read more »it to RFD. Mr Wiki Pro (talk) 18:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC) Update The article in question has just been deleted. Requesting closure for this RFD.--Mr Wiki...
Click to read more »likely created for promotion. I was unsure wether to tag it for a QD or RFD. Druddigon (talk) 17:55, 13 August 2015 (UTC) Hi, can this request be withdrawn...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete If I'm not mistaken, there was a previous RfD and the consensus was to delete. Shouldn't this be deleted based on the fact...
Click to read more »notable. This was previously kept at an RFd in 2022, but I’m not seeing notability, and the consensus of that RFD was a little iffy (one weak keep, one...
Click to read more »available on other language wiki, I had to open this rfd instead qd. So note that the intention of this rfd is not just to delete it, but also if others have...
Click to read more »for the reason: Simply a copy of Prince Sameer Shah, which is currently in RFD progress. Aster🪻 talk edits 19:37, 31 October 2024 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »- Yes, I acknowledge precedent from the previous 2022 RFDs, however, I reference this 2014 RFD that to me, makes excellent arguments. Actresses are separated...
Click to read more »why you list these three pages. Do you intend them to be included in this RFD? Note that I have deleted the first two because of "List of List of" in the...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Possible G11 but is contested so I thought an RfD would be better :) Goblin 16 50, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »comment for the page yet but you still can QD a page at RFD unless it had went through another RFD or a QD was declined before it is sent here.--Cohaf (talk)...
Click to read more »Building from this RFD, there is no significant coverage of any of these beaches, and they are not notable enough for inclusion. This RFD is for all the articles...
Click to read more »again, instead of going through an rfd. --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 11:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC) Comment: This is a RFD for a recently re-created page, the...
Click to read more »doesn't apply to RFDs. In any case, the qd and wait templates have both been removed from the article, so we can just focus on this RFD. -- -- Auntof6 (talk)...
Click to read more »Therefore you could actually say the RfD was quite successful. Normandie Talk! 12:34, 23 December 2010 (UTC) Agreed. Had the RFD not been posted, I for one wouldn't...
Click to read more »feel that this article has been written in a promotional matter/sense, an RfD would not be the right place for that. Now, as for notability, the subject...
Click to read more »on the other RFD, I don't think I should have to type it twice.-- † CM16 18:36, 28 March 2009 (UTC) These are two wholly separate RFDs though. That...
Click to read more »removing the rfd template. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:17, 15 July 2017 (UTC) Thank you. They had been removing the notability tag so I decided to go to RFD since they...
Click to read more »been twice deleted, including an RfD discussion. This is one reason we ended up with a huge list of RfD items. RfD is for decisions which need discussion...
Click to read more »find that matches these titles is this Youtube channel. I wanted this to be RfD instead of QD so it would encompass anything related to "The Juice" that...
Click to read more »added Dee Dee and the Man 2 (2020) to this RFD. It was nominated for QD as a hoax. However, with this existing RFD, I wanted to include it. This opens the...
Click to read more »the original article which originally was at RFD, Lesson learnt - Don't QD pages whilst they're at RFD. My apologies. –Davey2010Talk 17:25, 9 August...
Click to read more »before nominating articles for deletion. This RFD could be speedy declined for that reason, and it takes RFD reviewers much longer to complete their review...
Click to read more »created with the RFD. If the article-space page needs to be deleted -- that's the one that's actually a redirect -- then put the RFD there instead. --Auntof6...
Click to read more »also put html comments on the RfD closure page to make it easier to keep days apart (for counting the 2-3 days worth of Rfds to keep. --Eptalon (talk) 22:33...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete not a dictionary, like all rfds, can always be replaced with a new article but should be deleted in its current...
Click to read more »user(s) and IP(s) whose only edits here are on this RFD (and therefore made no edits before the RFD). --Auntof6 (talk) 07:09, 29 October 2020 (UTC) Sandesh...
Click to read more »of the subject and coverages of its events. The article was deleted by an RFD which I believe was not satisfactory. It had only two comments, one from...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I would...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: QD contested, therefore RfD. Seems to be the author of one movie, according to IMDB. Fainlty remember...
Click to read more »same status, RFD may not be needed. MathXplore (talk) 10:09, 6 August 2022 (UTC) @MathXplore, then I think I must request QD:G7 on this RfD page, what do...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Note - RFD template was placed on the article page at 22:15 16 November; RFD discussion was created at 01:17 18 November;...
Click to read more »at times, such as threatening to delete all one line stubs if a certain RFD passed. My reasons for support also include a desire to see the whole NVS/BG7...
Click to read more »Keep. Nomination withdrawn. Note, this article is still involved in this RFD.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 22:43, 12 May 2010 (UTC) Manifest Destiny and the Migration...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete Generous to take this to RFD as this could be QD'd as either G4 (previous RFD discussion) or G5 as the creator is now blocked for...
Click to read more »similarly to what I mentioned in another RFD, NEXIST applies here. I don't think that we can delete an article via RFD on the basis that the subject is not...
Click to read more »denied a G4 since that only applies to articles deleted through Rfd. So I decided to make an Rfd so any future creations can be. Djsasso (talk) 14:16, 19 August...
Click to read more »That's why I am raising the point of we have to start treating RFDs as PRODs at WP:ST. I mean RFD is always PROD but at times we can forget. Camouflaged Mirage...
Click to read more »in RFD. I know that they keep on adding more spam/copyvio, but it can clearly be reverted. G4 can only apply if the article is being deleted via RFD. See...
Click to read more »such as merging. I was unaware of the previous RFD, Given my analysis of the sources in the last RFD I still believe this isn't a notable company and...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage ShadowBallX has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:...
Click to read more »reason: Simple Wikipedia is suspiciouly seen as a link/source, brought to RFD, revert if im wrong thnx. BigKrow (talk) 21:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »2019 (UTC) This concerns pages at RFD being deleted under the following circumstances: The RFD is created in 2018 The RFD consensus is to delete the page...
Click to read more »Mewtwo, Jigglypuff, Lucario. Those articles should be discussed in another RFD dicussion since no real agreement to redirect or delete them happened. NonvocalScream...
Click to read more »in case anyone was wondering, I've been trying to keep on top of closing RFDs, but there are a few I'm not closing because I commented on them. Someone...
Click to read more »but I moved it back pending closure of this RFD. @Sujon004: Please do not move pages that have open RFDs. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by...
Click to read more »namespace! You have never: reported vandalism at WP:VIP, taken part in a WP:RFD, tagged an article for WP:QD, discussed anything at WP:ST. How are we to...
Click to read more »to Delete. QDed per G4. Recreation of Sam Pio that was deleted after an RFD with similar content-BRP ever 13:04, 26 July 2020 (UTC) Samantha Ismael Gabriel...
Click to read more »to another. This can be fixed by an administrator after discussion at WP:RFD. If there is only a redirect with no history at the other name, the move...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requests/2021/Mohammed_Shanooj is based on RFD or a QD. I am seeing can G4 applies. Thanks. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:26...
Click to read more »regular RfD. Possibly notable Indian businessman (born 1990). As there were disputes over quick deletion, I tjink its best to do aregular RfD. Comments...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment: No reason for deletion is given. Also this Rfd isn't transcluded onto the main Rfd page. Kk.urban (talk) 07:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC) Hello...
Click to read more »are so much "keep" votes, I think there is no more need to continue this RFD. If any admin is available, you can close this discussion now. I myself admit...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. RFD is not a vote. I went through the comments and there is barely anything suggesting...
Click to read more »cases like this. If the QD is declined, there's no harm done and then an RFD can be done. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC) It's your...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. per RFD discussion--Peterdownunder (talk) 23:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC) Anomalous Properties...
Click to read more »the rfd tag keep getting removed, can the page be protected? Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 02:43, 9 September 2021 (UTC) @つがる If the page is at risk of deletion...
Click to read more »there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Comment RFDs aren't for gathering ideas. If you want ideas post a section on Simple Talk...
Click to read more »that shouldn't be in an encyclopedia. If a page has already gone through RfD or QD and was not deleted, it should not be quickly deleted using this rule...
Click to read more »RFD run. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:08, 3 May 2019 (UTC) @Auntof6: Woah you're right, they are. Fortunately only 8 of them are transclusions so if the RFD passes...
Click to read more »October 2022 (UTC) @N1TH Music: I think it's at RFD because none of the QD options currently apply. If this RFD passes, then G4 could apply for the specific...
Click to read more »mainspace; however he also participates in discussions in AN, Simple Talk and RFD. He is an excellent vandalism fighter and has several rollbacks and ViP reports...
Click to read more »would see it sent straight to RfD. --Yottie =talk= 17:42, 7 November 2020 (UTC) Going through RfD, and tagging all rfd's with noidex is only part of the...
Click to read more »deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete, and a lot was added after this RFD started --Auntof6 (talk) 19:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC) Kefee (edit · talk...
Click to read more »exist). Also @Jim.henderson: you didn't put the discussion into the main RFD page which probably made it not noticeable. Zaxxon0 (talk) 01:15, 24 June...
Click to read more »note: As of the time I write this, this IP's only edits have been to this RFD. -- Auntof6 (talk) 20:42, 26 November 2022 (UTC) Delete What can I say except...
Click to read more »to Delete. Quick-deleted as recreation with same or similar content. Old RFD from September last year is here--Eptalon (talk) 22:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »At the bare minimum, this can be merged /redirected if needed outside a RFD if we think the version here is still very duplicative. I see no reason whatsoever...
Click to read more »don't think that applies to categories. It could mean C1, but since this rfd already exists, we need to deal with it here. An admin could decide to speedy...
Click to read more »for the reason: I was borderline on whether to qd, but decided to go with rfd. This is basically a dicdef, which should be deleted. Auntof6 (talk) 11:30...
Click to read more »as an exact re-creation of Ali Qassim, an article deleted last month at RFD - Griff (talk) 03:49, 23 March 2022 (UTC) Ali Qassim Jawad Al-Lawati (edit...
Click to read more »make changes to it within the last 6 months. You can't simply remove the RfD notice from a page because you don't agree with it. Yes, other users can...
Click to read more »how to do. Jim Michael (talk) 16:42, 25 November 2013 (UTC) I fixed the rfd template on the category, so there is now a link to this discussion. What...
Click to read more »articles through the RFD process. Griff (talk) 00:52, 26 December 2024 (UTC) I investigated this further as part of a similar RFD. While I stand by earlier...
Click to read more »article had to go to RFD. I also didn't realize the QD for lack of a claim of notability did not apply in this case, so I will go to RFD in the future, provided...
Click to read more »multiple times, was brought to RFD but QD again per Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requests/2021/Mai_Vu_Minh, I think a proper RFD is in place. Camouflaged...
Click to read more »page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Procedural close RFD isn't for merge discussions. Discuss on talk page. -Djsasso (talk) 12:03...
Click to read more »Can't find anything on this politician. Possible hoax, but we'll go with RFD for the moment, in case somebody else can find something. Gordonrox24 | Talk...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. RFD is not a vote. Arguments in favor of delete outweigh the ones in favor of...
Click to read more »not notable and deletable per QD A4 why waste the communities time with a RfD?-- † CR90 19:25, 22 December 2009 (UTC) In the case of this article, it...
Click to read more »here. Despite the clear meat puppeting that is happening here. Remember Rfd is not a vote. -DJSasso (talk) 17:19, 28 February 2019 (UTC) Russell Surasky...
Click to read more »QD'd Nominator created it and was the only person to edit it so didn't need Rfd. -Djsasso (talk) 12:28, 11 March 2022 (UTC) Module:CountryData/cachel (edit...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Article improved during rfd process--Peterdownunder (talk) 05:35, 27 April 2015 (UTC) Bell tower (edit...
Click to read more »(UTC) On the RfD page, one should put all the "RfD regarding redirects" - in its own section, directly following all the "non-redirect RfD".--(My idea...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: There was a previous RFD that was closed as keep. All the votes on the last RFD were from globally banned users and sockpuppets...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. as G4. Has been through Rfd many times with various page names such as J-Pimp. -Djsasso (talk) 00:47...
Click to read more »which part(s), if any, you think are worth merging. With the large number of RFDs we're getting, the admins can use all the specifics we can get. --Auntof6...
Click to read more »This user's only edits here have been to their user page, this RFD, and the article the RFD is for. -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC) Yes I'm...
Click to read more »(UTC) Administrator note: The above user's only edits here have been to this RFD and the article it is for. In addition, the user is indeffed and globally...
Click to read more »many articles. I also noticed that you have very little participation in RFD's and not very many articles marked for quick deletion, which means you would...
Click to read more »I have is that I don't know anything about you. You've never voted on WP:RFD, nor voted here on other candidates. You also only rarely edit summaries...
Click to read more »March 2020 (UTC) Comment: Thau 66 blanked out the page shortly after the RfD started. I am not sure if this is supposed to be a G7/U1 self-requested delete...
Click to read more »16:42, 30 August 2014 (UTC) Mac, you could do that without affecting this rfd, because this page title has all the words starting with upper case and your...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:55, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Comment Was speedy deleted after this Rfd was created by Macdonald-ross. I have restored it because it doesn't meet...
Click to read more »why he added rfd to this article 444metaphor (talk) 11:24, 17 October 2021 (UTC) Delete this article seems to be promotion, because the Rfd tag on the Page...
Click to read more »to Delete. Quickly deleted as recreation of page previously deleted via RFD --Auntof6 (talk) 09:10, 8 October 2022 (UTC) Salvatore Ambrosini (edit ·...
Click to read more »RfD is where we have to prove it. So any of those examples you use might not be notable and maybe they should be deleted, but they need to go to RfD to...
Click to read more »RfD.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:36, 25 October 2021 (UTC) Delete There is an Rfd for the main article and a template is too soon. Let's see if that RfD survives...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Delete. Quick deleted per the dicdef/wikt Rfd resolution. Disambig page moved to this pages location. --Creol(talk) 07:18...
Click to read more »the quick deletion rules, then there needs to be a Request For Deletion (RFD). This allows the article to be deleted after a discussion. For cases where...
Click to read more »for deletion was to Keep. Close early as the article was improved during rfd discussions--Peterdownunder (talk) 12:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC) False memory...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Keep. Closed early, article rewritten since, RFD no longer relevant--Peterdownunder (talk) 22:16, 14 November 2014 (UTC) Breakbeat...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Delete. G4 deletion - same article was deleted at RFD 6 months ago --Griff (talk) 02:04, 16 April 2022 (UTC) Marvelous MMW (edit...
Click to read more »G4 but I couldn't see an Rfd for it unless I am blind (which is totally possible) so G4 didn't apply so bringing it to Rfd. Djsasso (talk) 14:57, 8 October...
Click to read more »discretion of an administrator. New end date: August:24 (wasn't visible on Rfd page)--Eptalon (talk) 03:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »was to Keep. Closed early as changes have improved the article during the RFD process --Peterdownunder (talk) 08:48, 28 April 2015 (UTC) Proactivity (edit...
Click to read more »think it's directly copied from enwiki, you could nominate for qd instead of rfd. It may be a copy, but the language seems simple enough for here. --Auntof6...
Click to read more »August 2021 (UTC) Delete even the person mentioned tried to remove the rfd notice. SHB2000 (talk) 01:31, 10 August 2021 (UTC) Delete not notable at...
Click to read more »they would improve the article, but there has been no change in it since RFD was opened --Auntof6 (talk) 18:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC) Abhishek Nigam (edit...
Click to read more »Google doesn't bring me much back, I am unsure of notability, so I bring to RFD. Only cited IMDB as References i n article. Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 01:32...
Click to read more »but I don't see how this template is going to be used, so I'll start this RFD as encouraged. MathXplore (talk) 06:07, 1 August 2022 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »to this discussion. Speedy deleted as a hoax. Didn't notice there was an rfd tag on the page but in researching if it was a hoax I agreed so speedied...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage Tanbiruzzaman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:...
Click to read more »Delete per nom, FWIW I was doing these in batches so that I didn't clog up RFD as even in batches (ie 5x10) I knew deleting these would be a royal pain...
Click to read more »deletion/Requests/2019/Joél Filsaime. Probably still not notable, but decided RFD anyway just in case. (useful to note that the creator has only made this...
Click to read more »counting people editing here reguiarly (and who edited here before this RFD, and on pages not related to this article.--Eptalon (talk) 17:19, 27 August...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. No objections to RFD, MathXplore (talk) 02:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC) Marie Docher (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. No objections to RFD MathXplore (talk) 13:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC) Jo Warne (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. No objections to RFD MathXplore (talk) 13:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC) Freddie Foreman (edit · talk ·...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. No objections to RFD MathXplore (talk) 13:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC) Natalie Casey (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. No objections to RFD MathXplore (talk) 05:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC) Wasurenai Hibi (edit · talk ·...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. No objections to RFD MathXplore (talk) 13:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC) Ronnie Knight (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. No objections to RFD MathXplore (talk) 05:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC) Names for ordinal numbers (edit...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. No objections to RFD MathXplore (talk) 13:14, 21 May 2024 (UTC) South Georgia and the South Sandwich...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. No objections to RFD MathXplore (talk) 05:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC) Hoshizora no Live: The Best of...
Click to read more »doesn't apply when the article has only been QD'd, not deleted at RFD. I have put back the RFD template. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC) @Auntof6:...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. RFD is not for cleanup. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC) Cosmic...
Click to read more »it serves no navigational purpose. No objection to keeping if after the RFD, more red can turn into blue. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:06, 14 November...
Click to read more »it serves no navigational purpose. No objection to keeping if after the RFD, more red can turn into blue. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:05, 14 November...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. *ignore the repeat rfd* Derpdart56 (talk) 13:46, 12 August 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »to read, but double copying think I is not allowed, sorry, need to add a Rfd :( Psl631 (talk · contribs) 18:55, 12 May 2018 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »or no proof it does. Seems to be a persistent issue, as this is the 5th RFD filed for the exact same (and valid) reason. Griff (talk) 13:13, 8 February...
Click to read more »Mirage (talk) 10:35, 22 January 2020 (UTC) If no one has said keep in the rfd and he is the sole contributor then it can G7 but since I nominated it I...
Click to read more »subject. Following the QD tag being placed, they then started an unneeded RfD for the article. I propose we implement WP:ONESTRIKE as it is evident that...
Click to read more »being worked on they are supposed to be nuked. Technically these postings to Rfd don't even need to be voted on as once the 7 days passes they can be soft...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. RFD withdrawn after rewrite. --Auntof6 (talk) 12:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC) Bohr radius...
Click to read more »deletion on this RFD. Article is also not written in a neutral tone --Tsugaru let's talk! :) 19:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC) Keep - RFD is not clean up....
Click to read more »an IP trying to disrupt this rfd like so. Computer Fizz (talk) 18:04, 25 January 2020 (UTC) I have semi-protected this RfD; there's both an IP and a named...
Click to read more »"keep" suggestions were made by IP editors who had no edits before this RFD was started --Auntof6 (talk) 07:40, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Start (Ali Tajdary...
Click to read more »"keep" suggestions were made by IP editors who had no edits before this RFD was started --Auntof6 (talk) 07:42, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Bi Ghanoon (edit...
Click to read more »both unfair and unfriendly to suggest that they stop taking part in votes, RfD discussions, etc. until they "gain more experience." This discourages new...
Click to read more »close of an RFD after the nominator withdrew the RFD. Cactusisme only closed the RFD discussion; they did not go back and remove the RFD from the article...
Click to read more »such as merging. Comment: Since the main article has been deleted per RFD, we have no place to redirect. We have to discuss about keep or delete. MathXplore...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Delete. G4 - was previously deleted at RFD CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:49, 15 June 2026 (UTC) Eterno (politician) (2nd...
Click to read more »November 2024 (UTC) Administrator note: Extending the date because this RFD was not listed on the main page. --Auntof6 (talk) 11:11, 30 November 2024...
Click to read more »years of age, in India, and any social media is linked, it’s a QD and not an Rfd. We are getting a ton of these lately. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done...
Click to read more »October 2013 (UTC) They do indeed. I withdraw the request and will remove the rfd tag from the article. Thanks to all both of you. This request is due to close...
Click to read more »from Google, but I'm not sure if this person is notable, so I bring this to RFD. つがる Let's Talk! :) 🍁 01:57, 27 November 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Per QD G5 and RFD MathXplore (talk) 12:10, 30 August 2024 (UTC) FlexClip (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Per RFD and QD G5 MathXplore (talk) 13:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC) RanDada Farm (edit ·...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Per QD G5 and RFD MathXplore (talk) 02:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC) Abdulrahman Abed (edit · talk...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Per QD G5 and RFD MathXplore (talk) 02:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC) Umaima al-Baghdadi (edit ·...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Per QD G5 and RFD MathXplore (talk) 06:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC) The Daily Target (edit ·...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Per RFD and QD G7 MathXplore (talk) 13:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC) Category:Exotic (edit...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. improvements made after the rfd--Peterdownunder (talk) 10:53, 20 December 2014 (UTC) Bookcase (edit · talk...
Click to read more »discretion of an administrator. New end date: August:24 (wasn't visible on Rfd page)--Eptalon (talk) 04:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »reason: Inappropriate use of userspace and user indeffed. Per the other RFD, delete. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »admin: This template has a doc page that will need to be deleted if this RFD passes. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC) Delete per nom. Etamni | ✉ | ✓ ...
Click to read more »removed the user category RFDs from WP:AFD as this discussion covers them as well and the page was getting rather cluttered. The RFD pages themselves have...
Click to read more »notable or there has been a previous RfD, the article may not be quickly deleted, and should be discussed at RfD instead." Two admins at least thought...
Click to read more »Keep. Discussion should occur on the templates' talk page and not here. RFD is not a forum!fr33kman 05:18, 16 February 2010 (UTC) Template:Sports (edit...
Click to read more »as an A4 (Non-notable); the editor is disputing it, so I am moving it to RfD for discussion. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 23:01, 13 July 2022...
Click to read more »thinks it is needed (Special:Diff/9677824). Should we reverse the previous RFD? MathXplore (talk) 09:14, 1 August 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »18:45, 18 January 2023 (UTC) I'm usually against adding pages to an existing RFD, for two reasons: People who've commented might have a different opinion...
Click to read more »{{subst:uw-encopypaste}} Removing deletion requests from articles {{subst:uw-rfd}} Information on cross-wiki attribution {{subst:uw-encopyright}} Userpage...
Click to read more »characteristic. I've collapsed the list above as there are 46 extra pages in this RfD. --Ferien (talk) 09:54, 16 August 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »close request Cohaf has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: RFD after CSD was denied. Notifying Praxidicae who tagged as A4. Non notable...
Click to read more »also en:Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sadakat_Aman_Khan the same enwp RFD which seems to have unanimous consensus to delete per TOOSOON Camouflaged...
Click to read more »was challenged, and the article has been restored. I will now nominate for RFD as being original research. Peterdownunder (talk) 12:56, 8 June 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »article doesn't make much sense, but deletion is not clean-up. So, this RFD is due to notability concerns. BRP ever 13:13, 27 October 2021 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »for. Hiàn (talk) 15:31, 3 April 2020 (UTC) Speedy delete why is this at rfd? It's a clear cut example of a4. Praxidicae (talk) 15:52, 3 April 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »substantially different from Ali Sabri (musician), which in turn was deleted via RFD, therefore I have speedied this one. Chenzw Talk 12:45, 4 February 2020...
Click to read more »not meet our standards. Recording my opinion so that there is both a QD & RFD reason to delete the article. Griff (talk) 14:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »deletion was to Delete. Speedy deleted as a copy vio. Didn't need to go to Rfd. Can be recreated if someone wants to do so with non-copy vio text. -DJSasso...
Click to read more »permissions request that did not succeed. Please do not modify it. Result: RfdCU unsuccessful. Chenzw Talk 13:29, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Fr33kman (talk ·...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Article edited during RFD process and improved Peterdownunder (talk) 10:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC) National...
Click to read more »(UTC) Please remember G4 only applies if there was an rfd before. You're linking to this very RfD so G4 doesn't apply here. --Ferien (talk) 16:49, 25 January...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:...
Click to read more »request · open RfD subpage Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This might technically qualify as A4, but I think RFD is a better...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Disputed QD, sending to Rfd. Appears to fail WP:GNG and w:WP:ENT --Ferien (talk) 12:12, 12 June 2023...
Click to read more »only edits here have been to comment on this RFD and to create a user page. All those edits were after this RFD began. -- Auntof6 (talk) 02:24, 15 September...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. RFD found that the subject of the article lacked notability. -Griff (talk) 01:23...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. No reason for the RFD on the talk page, deleted as housekeeping Peterdownunder (talk) 09:26, 7...
Click to read more »mainspace count above your talkspace count. And i'd like to see you in WP:RFD and WP:RFA. Sebb Talk 19:39, 27 July 2008 (UTC) Thank you. I will take that...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Delete. QD'd (under G4) twice since this RFD started --Auntof6 (talk) 07:15, 30 March 2025 (UTC) Mohammad Safoyan Hossain...
Click to read more »such as merging. Administrator note: Not listed properly in RfD extended time and posted in Rfd — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enfcer (talk • contribs)...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage Shadow. 547 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:...
Click to read more »Delete. Speedy close as this article has been previously deleted after an RFD: See Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2017/Amilton Rodríguês de Cristo...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. QD G11 (RFD started soon after QD) MathXplore (talk) 05:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC) User:JADAVMEETSEO...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: There was a similar that article was previously up for RFD and was voted to keep all by globally banned users and sockpuppets. I am...
Click to read more »Administrator note: This user's only contributions here have been on this RFD. -- Auntof6 (talk) 00:09, 21 May 2023 (UTC) Comment: Was banned for sockpuppetry...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Keep. Nominator has now changed to keep. RFD is withdrawn. Only (talk) 17:07, 12 October 2013 (UTC) Refrain (edit · talk...
Click to read more »for deletion was to Keep. The article has been improved since start of RFD--Peterdownunder (talk) 10:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC) Patina (edit · talk...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. No objections to RFD, content available in Simple English Wiktionary MathXplore (talk) 05:57,...
Click to read more »- No notability or significant coverage. Was half-surprised to find this RFD discussion when googling the topic. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 11:07, 3...
Click to read more ») as being not notable, the writer being "ordinary". I have moved it to RFD as it did not meet qd criteria Peterdownunder (talk) 04:07, 21 October 2015...
Click to read more »(the auto RFD tool didn't create this one as a 2nd request) and was kept then. I agree with User:Griffinofwales' analysis from that previous RFD. CountryANDWestern...
Click to read more »else has worked on it, G7 should be rejected and it should be referred to RFD. Once other users have added to the work, blanking it is then vandalism....
Click to read more »under the G4 criteria. Identical enough as the article discussed in the last RFD— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 11:38, 23 May 2023 (UTC) Vishal Rathod (artist)...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. The base page is at RFD; this talk page will be deleted if the base page is deleted. --Auntof6 (talk)...
Click to read more »Delete. The only "keep" vote was from a user whose only edit here is on this RFD. Because of that and because that user gave no rationale, I did not consider...
Click to read more »(UTC) Some of the subtemplates are used, which is why I brought this to RFD instead of QD. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:04, 29 November 2011 (UTC) Delete - As...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy Delete Already discussed on RFD before, page has been created and deleted multiple times already --つがる Let's...
Click to read more »merging. Keep - I was conflicted by this one, especially since on Amber's RFD, I pushed to delete, but frankly, Payden has several reliable sources written...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Comment: After the RFD has started, the IP editor made more pages and now the navbox has enough...
Click to read more »different areas, primarily focusing on anti-vandalism but also helping out at RfD and with article cleanup. They applied for adminship back in 2024 and withdrew...
Click to read more »could not find any significant coverage in reliable sources. Also see enWP's RFD from 3 years ago, based off that, it looks like the same issues are present...
Click to read more »Probable hoax I should disclaim that I previously took this halfway to RFD in May, but didn't finish it. But there haven't been any arguments to the...
Click to read more »possibly single-purpose account. I propose we discuss this as a regular RFD. Eptalon (talk) 16:54, 15 June 2019 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »and wait for another admin to reevaluate or take them to RFD. And these days I prefer to do RFDs instead of tagging them for QD.-BRP ever 16:54, 17 September...
Click to read more »discretion of an administrator. New end date: August:24 (wasn't visible on Rfd page)--Eptalon (talk) 04:02, 17 August 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »no good claim of notability, but the worldwide broadcast may count, so RFD. Just a ROTM station and a simple Google news and search doesn't yield any...
Click to read more »should be removed from the name. However, please do not remove it while this RFD is still active, because it will break links. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:17, 30...
Click to read more »14:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC) Hi, that's not why I nominated the article for rfd. It is because the company in question does not appear notable. Belwine •...
Click to read more »such as merging. Quick delete It's a hoax. I actually mentioned it in my RFD. Etoza (?) 18:09, 8 June 2021 (UTC) Quick delete Obvious hoax. Speedy deletion...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a web host (this rfd also applies to the /Harvest subpage) Naleksuh (talk) 22:47, 2 September...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable website. The last RFD was closed as soft deleted. Depextual (talk) 08:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete - I was about to tag this as QD then noticed the RFD tag up top. Don't see anything that makes this a notable artist. CountryANDWestern...
Click to read more »original close date here, because this request was not transcluded on the main RFD page. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:51, 2 November 2022 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't...
Click to read more »also socking issues here, fortunately checkuser was available to me. This RFD can be closed G6, fr33kman 11:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC) The following discussion...
Click to read more »why did you make another RfD? Remember to check whether or not your RfD tag has been removed by another user before the RfD period ends instead of creating...
Click to read more »deletion was to Delete. Clear case, also salted for 3 months, the last RfD of this was at most a month ago...--Eptalon (talk) 20:45, 31 July 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »of a deletionist opinion for the other Rugrats-related RFDs, which should be merged into one RFD IMO. Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 00:09, 21 April 2011 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »🄴🄳🄸🅃🄾🅁 -(𝙇𝙚𝙩'𝙨 𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠) 13:15, 27 December 2022 (UTC) Keep per other Rfd Pure Evil (talk) 20:46, 27 December 2022 (UTC) Delete [1]— *Fehufangą ♮...
Click to read more »merging. Delete Obvious self-promotion and was already discussed on another RFD: Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requests/2019/Pechkurov_Aleksej_(musical_author)...
Click to read more »it. Jackson Lorry, who is claimed to be subjects brother is going through RFD below. By the looks of it, this case is a self promotion case. BRP ever 08:21...
Click to read more »🄴🄳🄸🅃🄾🅁 -(𝙇𝙚𝙩'𝙨 𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠) 13:15, 27 December 2022 (UTC) Keep per other Rfd Pure Evil (talk) 20:47, 27 December 2022 (UTC) Delete [1]— *Fehufangą ♮...
Click to read more »checkuser (log)) Per overlapping activity at Hacktivist Vanguard, removing rfd tag. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 21:45, 30 January 2024 (UTC) Check user shows...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Apparently...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage The Sophocrat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage Peterdownunder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:...
Click to read more »close request · open RfD subpage CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Was kept previously at an RFD 11 years ago. However...
Click to read more »ѕwirlвoy ₪ 00:24, 27 November 2008 (UTC) Delete - Non-notable, and whilst RFD is not a place for cleanup related discussion, the article is not written...
Click to read more »notable. Not much again from the regular Google lookup, I bring this to RFD for everyone's thoughts... Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 01:44, 24 January 2021...
Click to read more »4 December 2021 (UTC) Article restored. Not eligible for A4 and was at RfD so I think it's best to let people decide there. --Ferien (talk) 12:37, 4...
Click to read more »that had actual talk on it, even though it was only the notice about this RFD. instead of deleting the page, I deleted everything except the actual talk...
Click to read more »Name Current text Where {{rfd|reason}} (talk) An editor has asked for deletion of this project page. You may join the discussion to give your opinion...
Click to read more »255.43.145) and an account (Am567887) have attempted to disrupt/stop this rfd by removing the template from tne page. Computer Fizz (talk) 06:47, 6 November...
Click to read more »Admin note: extending close date because discussion wasn't added to the rfd page. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:17, 28 September 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »talk page. MathXplore (talk) 13:22, 27 December 2022 (UTC) Keep per other Rfd Pure Evil (talk) 20:48, 27 December 2022 (UTC) Delete [1]— *Fehufangą ♮...
Click to read more »I said before: As long as the RfD is running, moving is not an option (as it likely breaks the templates). After the RfD ends, we can look at moving, if...
Click to read more »In its current state, the article is no reflection of the one tagged for Rfd. At best the tagged article was a1 qd if the user didn't feel it was better...
Click to read more »merging. Comment: I changed the date because this was not transcluded on WP:RFD. Batrachoseps (talk) 16:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. QD per previous Rfd (here)--Creol(talk) 14:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC) Same rationale as for depict...
Click to read more »such as merging. Comment: just realized that this was already deleted at RFD, sent to a QD MrMeAndMrMeTalk 01:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »for recreation of recently deleted material as it was just deleted at an RFD last week. CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:34, 15 June 2025 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Comment:, I don't know it was previously deleted by RFD. The article should be deleted QD under G4.Dibyojyotilet's chat 03:33, 8...
Click to read more »took place. Ternera (talk) 16:48, 26 December 2024 (UTC) Delete per this RFD I have started. Griff (talk) 01:15, 29 December 2024 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »just revert with edit summary "was ok". In addition, the opening of this RFD where the creator had only just created the article shows too eagerness to...
Click to read more »(UTC) Note - I wasn't aware of the original RFD when I nominated this. That being said, since the first RFD was closed as a WP:SOFTDELETE, I'll keep this...
Click to read more »articles to be discussed in the same RFD, especially so when at least one of the articles here was kept in a previous RFD. Chenzw Talk 02:53, 11 January...
Click to read more »stop discussing this now; I realistically do not see an outcome of this RfD which is indepenent of that of the category (Cold war Leders), just below...
Click to read more »not notable. EN wiki doesn't have a page. (I made this now even though the Rfd was made a while back) Ely - Talk 07:00, 1 September 2021 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »Per Talk:Uttarakhand 2013 they need a week for sources so brought it to RFD. Thanks BRP ever 09:17, 30 October 2018 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »rather than quick-deleting it", so the notability is the agenda. Since the RFD started after I tagged for QD A4, we can hardly avoid discussing the notability...
Click to read more »2023 (UTC) @RiggedMint this page has deleted for nonsense, let's close this rfd! Editor114514 (talk) 15:40, 21 December 2023 (UTC) Wasn't a valid QD as it...
Click to read more »deletion was to Keep. Interested editors are welcome to merge as proposed. RFD is requests for deletion, not discussion; requests are not needed here for...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Not quick deletion criteria, can be a reason for RfD. However, this could have been, and has been, expanded, which goes against...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage Dasani053 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not...
Click to read more »for deletion was to Delete. Due to confusion in time zone I closed the RFD some hours before the due time but the consensus is unlikely to change by...
Click to read more »Bensebgli (Talk) 02:17, 12 April 2025 (UTC) Delete The nominator for this RFD is now blocked. This article has been created and deleted before at Sharad...
Click to read more »conflicts. @BigKrow: For future nominations to RFD, please outline why you believe the article is a hoax. This RFD was inappropriate. Griff (talk) 15:50, 26...
Click to read more »reason: Seems to be different from previous deleted versions, so taking to RFD instead QD G4. This musical artist BLP has no details about discography and...
Click to read more »Delete. In evaluating this RfD, I took into account the fact that the only edits made by the two voting IPs were related to this RfD. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:47...
Click to read more »deletion was to Delete. Sources cited (including those mentioned on this RFD page itself) were not found to provide significant coverage of the subject...
Click to read more »notable or significant within history, and have little information. This RFD applies to the list, as well as all articles linked within the article in...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. per the previous RfD. Thanks for the link. I was looking for it. The article now is a redirect...
Click to read more »deletion. It just means that the page does not need to wait for the seven day RfD period. The really is little need for most pages to instantly get deleted...
Click to read more »maybe G12 but inter simple wiki attribution issues can be easily fixed, so RFD seems the only option. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:57, 26 October 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. If you demonstrate something notable about it I will cancel my RFD. Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 14:33, 28 June 2013 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »Blissyu2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Brought to RFD after request from IP editor, who said the following on the article's talk...
Click to read more »Without reliable sources shown clearly, notability is not proved and the RFD must continue. MathXplore (talk) 01:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »discretion of an administrator. New end date: August:24 (wasn't visible on Rfd page)--Eptalon (talk) 04:03, 17 August 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »🄴🄳🄸🅃🄾🅁 -(𝙇𝙚𝙩'𝙨 𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠) 13:15, 27 December 2022 (UTC) Keep per other Rfd Pure Evil (talk) 20:46, 27 December 2022 (UTC) Delete [1]— *Fehufangą ♮...
Click to read more »-DJSasso (talk) 11:02, 13 April 2018 (UTC) Yes, first I thought that but RFD seem fair, since it gives creator a chance to say why it might be needed...
Click to read more »🄴🄳🄸🅃🄾🅁 -(𝙇𝙚𝙩'𝙨 𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠) 13:14, 27 December 2022 (UTC) Keep per other Rfd Pure Evil (talk) 20:45, 27 December 2022 (UTC) Delete [1]— *Fehufangą ♮...
Click to read more »but it's to Lists of television channels in India, which is also up at RFD. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:14, 18 October 2022 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »for him that I can see. I did a QD but it was challenged, so converting to RFD. PotsdamLamb (talk) 18:45, 4 May 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »Quick deletion under category A1 (Little or no meaning). Now it's out for RFD, it'll have to stay here. If you want a quick way to do this and you understand...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: As pointed at a relevant RFD, almost all of the content comes from a single source: "Market Publishers"...
Click to read more »since it was created in 2010. --Horeki (talk) 14:45, 23 September 2012 (UTC) RFD withdrawn -- notability established using Japanese webpages here --Horeki...
Click to read more »sandboxes. Although, the creator may respond in occasion of the RFD so let's wait until the RFD closure. MathXplore (talk) 14:21, 16 October 2022 (UTC) Yep...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage Passengerpigeon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:...
Click to read more »Kennedy (talk) 08:55, 5 January 2009 (UTC) I see you are quite active at RfD, so ignore that part of my previous comment, it was just me who didn't notice...
Click to read more »close to the government. Similar in style to Raman Bandarenka (RfD) and Hienadz Shutau (RfD). So, like the others: Possibly notable for just one event (BLP1E);...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Comment: @Absolutiva Is your RFD Requests that you created? I voted Delete because Non Notable Raayaan9911...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Administrator note: The RFD starter did not include the discussion in Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletio...
Click to read more »n/Requests/2024/Vince_Maristela, not familiar enough to just QD so going RFD route. The sources are both from the group he is signed to, so not independent...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Administrator note: time from start of inclusion on rfd. -Barras talk 14:36, 6 July 2025 (UTC) This request is due to close on 00:20...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Procedural renomination as first RFD (Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Almal Real Estate Development)...
Click to read more »seem to be notable, using Google to lookup, I found no results. Sending to RFD for discussion.... Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 22:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »be given to this request. Unlike the asteroid RFD, Razorflame was not informed of the Romanian rivers RFD since he had officially retired from the project...
Click to read more »deletion to WP:RFD and when it is not necessary. The article "The Reluctant Dragon" which I tagged for deletion didn't have to be posted at RFD since it was...
Click to read more »(under Zóviz and Zoviz), I don't know if that's better than letting the RfD run for a week so there's a discussion to point to later....
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Early close of invalid rfd. This is not a user talk page, it is a user page. Many users redirect their...
Click to read more »Bobherry Talk My Changes 23:34, 1 June 2023 (UTC) Withdraw Just saw it had a RFD previously closed as delete. Bobherry Talk My Changes 23:36, 1 June 2023...
Click to read more »request Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: First RFD: Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Rajputs mentioned as shudras...
Click to read more »disambiguation, As far as I'm aware there's no applicable QD hence this RFD but if anyone wants to speedy delete I'd have no objections, Thanks –Davey2010Talk...
Click to read more »discretion of an administrator. New end date: August:24 (wasn't visible on Rfd page)--Eptalon (talk) 03:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »(Non-administrator observation) Changed to 06:12, 4 of October (UTC), not filed on RFD page--Cactus🌵 spiky ツ 06:12, 27 September 2024 (UTC) Delete not notable...
Click to read more »was moved to End of the Soran Dynasty and significantly edited since this RFD opened. CountryANDWestern (talk) 01:34, 24 July 2025 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG, not notable. Note that an {{RFD}} template was placed on the article on August 7th, but the discussion page...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Administrator note: time from start of inclusion on rfd. -— Preceding unsigned comment added by Barras (talk • contribs) 14:35, 6...
Click to read more »close request Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: RFD added by Enegmo (talk · contribs) with the following reason: AI/LLM generated...
Click to read more »10:09, 26 February 2025 (UTC) changed closure time as it was not listed on RFD page Cactus🌵 spiky ツ 10:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC) This is just propaganda...
Click to read more »has been recreated several times, so creating this discussion to get the RFD on record. Unsourced article, excessively promotional in tone. Great on a...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I am nominating this for RFD due to En:WP:NOTWEBHOST, and per the guidelines at WP:UP, I am not sure if...
Click to read more »Giuseppe Conti.For one of his paintings, see it:Il battello gira la punta. RfD is not for cleanup; the translation we have is workable. I am not anm art...
Click to read more »basic questions: Is this notable, and worth simplifying? - Doing a regular RfD to give the original author a chance to simplify.. Eptalon (talk) 17:09,...
Click to read more »desirable to keep both. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:38, 7 January 2014 (UTC) Withdrawn RFD Pending(tell me I screwed up and where) 19:40, 7 January 2014 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »doubt however that this TV series is notable which is why I've brought it to Rfd N1TH Music (talk) 15:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »the physician who is the subject of en:William Mobley. This was already at RFD before, but that was a soft delete so it can't be used as a reason to delete...
Click to read more »deletion was to Keep. Article improved since nomination; nominator withdrew RfD. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 20:08, 11 October 2025 (UTC) Fiorenza Bassoli...
Click to read more »removed), and that there already was consensus to delete the article in another RFD (which I don't find at the moment, probably in 2006, or 2007). I therefore...
Click to read more »below. Whilst we do have an automatic removal policy (indeed, his previous RfdA two years ago [Take note of that number] was closed early for that reason)...
Click to read more »--Creol(talk) 21:47, 27 June 2013 (UTC) QD -- there was no need for this rfd. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:29, 27 June 2013 (UTC) Quick delete: I agree that this...
Click to read more »support deletion with banned contributor. A4 might be controversial. Hence, a RFD with rationale of non notable as well gibberish. Cohaf (talk) 11:17, 17 December...
Click to read more »search results lead to sources about other Pakistani provinces. Allow this RFD to include these: Provincial animal of Eastern Pakistan Provincial tree of...
Click to read more »AFD process, which we don't have here. We use different templates for our RFD process. Auntof6 (talk) 07:07, 24 December 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »and the founder of the company have the same name and they also removed RFD tag twice indicating advertisement.-BRP ever 09:18, 1 July 2018 (UTC) Now...
Click to read more »just point out that 1) maybe QD applies, but the editor has chosen to do an RFD instead, and 2) you haven't given a keep or delete opinion. -- Auntof6 (talk)...
Click to read more »ImprovedWikiImprovment for G11, removed by an anon, since the other is now at RFD, propose this to be discussed also. Promotional in tone too. Camouflaged...
Click to read more »delete G4 - has been quickly deleted many times. There's also been another rfd this year that was quickly closed. —Belwine (talk) 07:27, 24 March 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »enough. (might I also note that he was active since 2017?) Putting it through RFD due to interwiki links. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 14:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »compared to Brittany Spears, appeared in movies never released. Link to enwiki rfd discussion [1] Thanks PotsdamLamb (talk) 09:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »but since they had coverage from embassies, they are excluded from this RFD. MathXplore (talk) 11:32, 30 August 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »currently have an RfD about a few categoiies (people, by occupation, mostly), where there are separate categories for men and women. In this RfD it became obvious...
Click to read more »this RFD passes, it would be simple to automate removing it using AWB. If the closing admin would like me to take care of that (again, if the RFD passes)...
Click to read more »be made to this discussion. I had started a discussion of a possible new RFD criterion above, hope there will be some comments. Camouflaged Mirage (talk)...
Click to read more »suggest that we create separate RFDs for the different professions so that the arguments can be more targeted. Those RFDs should include people from all...
Click to read more »against NPOV. So I propose we delete this. I want to do it in a regular RfD so that the community has a chance to comment. Eptalon (talk) 09:05, 16 November...
Click to read more »This is a bizarre request, with the original article author filing this RFD. I was unable to find any reliable sources about this person that could meet...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete AI article, I think i tagged QD before RfD. Raayaan9911 14:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC) Comment:(Non-administrator observation)...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:...
Click to read more »is in Draft: space, so possibly work in progress. I am using the regular Rfd process, this was originally a quick deletion. I haven't seen much simplification...
Click to read more »notable. TheAE talk 01:11, 8 March 2009 (UTC) Delete Considering there is a WP:RFD on wikipedia then these articles should be deleted unless then can be improved...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) I am fine with this RfD being closed as keep (was somewhat of an experiment with a new way I found articles to rfd), and the results are known...
Click to read more »this user is an active member in the RFD area, and as such, it is reasonable that this user would comment on RFDs (and ST discussions) for which they have...
Click to read more »examples you cited in the last RfD were from 2012. --IWI (talk) 04:10, 12 January 2021 (UTC) Thanks for locating the more recent RFD on EN, this didn't appear...
Click to read more »Quick Deletion, but I think they had good intentions so I'm starting an RfD instead. Krett12 (talk) 23:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. QD per previous Rfd (here)--Creol(talk) 14:03, 30 April 2013 (UTC) actually it isn't in wiktionary...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Delete. There was limited discussion on this RFD, however the commenters noted that the nominator's reasons were valid, but...
Click to read more »be used in articles. Many of these words are jargon. !vote A entry on a RfD discussion that is not a vote. Article An encyclopaedia entry. All articles...
Click to read more »Delete - I nominated this in 2011 and still stand by my statements at that RFD. Only (talk) 16:09, 19 October 2013 (UTC) Delete: Non-notable newspaper....
Click to read more »I remember the N900 being a poplular phone among hackers, at the time. RFD is not for cleanup. There are many poorly written articles i this wikipedia...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Rfd is not for cleanup, and we can discuss how our Graffiti article can be improved...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:...
Click to read more »no significant coverage in reliable sources. Recommend SALTing after this RFD. Griff (talk) 03:19, 26 March 2022 (UTC) Endorsing a salt of the page and...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Didn't get any votes at Rfd last time so it was only a soft delete so can't be speedy deleted as a recreation...
Click to read more »soft-deleting till someone writes an accurate cited article on these topics. This RFD covers this article and listed articles. Griff (talk) 22:50, 4 January 2025...
Click to read more »quick delete per nom and Ray - imho should be deleted per G5, won't tag as RFD closes today anyway. --–Davey2010Talk 17:25, 29 November 2024 (UTC) Quick...
Click to read more »template was added. Basically this is a notability issue. I'm sending it to RFD and removing it from QD. fr33kman 20:42, 13 August 2023 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) Hi @WuTang94, You're more than welcome to improve it as this RFD will be closed at 18:02, 29 March 2025, Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk...
Click to read more »review BEFORE to determine articles that are appropriate for referral to RFD. Griff (talk) 01:50, 26 December 2024 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Administrator note: The RFD starter did not include the discussion in Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletio...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete per nom. @Fr33kman: I created a RFD for a whole bunch of those articles. See Wikipedia:Requests for...
Click to read more »such as merging. Administrator note: - time from start of inclusion on rfd. -Barras talk 14:31, 6 July 2025 (UTC) This request is due to close on 13:48...
Click to read more »in English generally isn't required, but given this article was taken to RFD at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Mohammed uzzal miah a week...
Click to read more »here, it is sent to RFD and both keep and delete consensus are good. An additional Reliable Source was published during the RFD of the article, but since...
Click to read more »Duplicates a lot of content from NASCAR TV which was recently deleted via RFD. None of the content within this sandbox would be useful for Simple Wikipedia...
Click to read more »not notable and fails to meet the WP:BIO . The only reason I bring up this RFD is their claim of an award and notability, but this is merely an honor from...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: QD request A4 (Not notable) was declined so, RfD. Currently RfD on Kiswahili Wikipedia. A talent manager not a primary artist. Most...
Click to read more »16:19, 9 March 2024 (UTC) @PotsdamLamb: Please don't remove RFD notices. That is done when the RFD is closed. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 19:52, 18 March 2024...
Click to read more »September 2023 (UTC) Comment: I put the humor on this RFD by inspiration by some humour on an enwiki RFD for a non-notable number — Preceding unsigned comment...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment: changing end date as page was never transcluded onto WP:RFD --Ferien (talk) 00:33, 17 July 2023 (UTC) Quick delete Per G11. Bobherry...
Click to read more »of notablity whatsoever and isn't notable per NCORP/CORPDEPTH. Going to RFD as it is contested QD. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:36, 8 March 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »entries in our human issues category do not seem to be activities. When this RFD is resolved, if the human issues categories is kept then the Wikidata situation...
Click to read more »User:Rus793 (talk) 13:34, 3 May 2016 (UTC) Technical/rules comment: There was no {{RFD}} template on the page itself until I added one just now. So I am going to...
Click to read more »of the claims as well as are those sources independent, hence, asking for RFD. I did a google and the english top result is a mirror of this. 2 English...
Click to read more »October 2018 (UTC) G4 only applies to articles that have gone through an Rfd. Not speedies. (No comment on if it should actually be deleted here yet)...
Click to read more »seeing as all the pages about it seem to be in Spanish. Either way this RFD turns out, I think this article shouldn't have the name 'PPT', as that is...
Click to read more »be sitting like this in user space. The editor has not edited since the RFD in July 2011. Only (talk) 01:19, 26 January 2016 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »nominated around 6 pages for RFD but they added RFD template only. Since the process is incomplete those pages are not listed in RFD page so they are unlikely...
Click to read more »Kansan (talk) 19:59, 29 April 2011 (UTC) If you get a chance head over to WP:RFD and weigh in on a few of the nominations, we have several with little or...
Click to read more »there's not exactly such thing as "replacing" editors per se...all RFAs and RFdAs are independent of each other Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 01:21...
Click to read more »September 2010 (UTC) Delete This article clearly does not show notability. This RfD is about our article, not the one enwiki has. If you [the keep voters] think...
Click to read more »accident) nor here in the discussion section. You must give a reason, or the RFD may be closed for procedural reasons. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:46, 29 July 2021...
Click to read more »find much about him. Not sure about this person's notability, so I bring to RFD Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 23:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »suggested on the talk page for this to be deleted so I am bringing it to RFD. This was their comments: (No explanation of how the subject possibly can...
Click to read more »15:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC) Since it's improved I would like to withdraw the RFD. Can an admin please close as keep? Computer Fizz (talk) 02:55, 7 August...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep per PirSquare's excellent changes. Could somebody close this RFD now that the nom changed his mind? Belle tête-à-tête 05:31, 10 May 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »for the reason: Was deleted on enwiki after multiple times after multiple RFDs. Fails W:WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Not an elected candidate, no other significant...
Click to read more »Camouflaged Mirage has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: 1st RFD close as no consensus. For the sources, one is a repeat source. Rest are...
Click to read more »seen as a RFD. For DRV, no consensus to do anything defaults the article to be deleted (if RFD result is delete) or article to be kept (if RFD results is...
Click to read more »sometimes editors remove the RfD templates. Would this be a good warning to fill this need? User:Naddruf/Template:Uw-rfd. See also the testcases. Naddruf...
Click to read more »as they inform me. However, I think that mass creation makes deletion via RFD difficult because there are so many similar articles to check through, so...
Click to read more »title. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC) I can't find an Rfd for anything similar. Feel free to provide a link if you find it. Otherwise...
Click to read more »Upaddhay --M7 (talk) 15:43, 17 May 2025 (UTC) Thanks. Didn't see a previous RFD regarding it so didn't tag it as recreated. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:45...
Click to read more »them, Ice Age (TV series) claimed to be produced by them, but per another RFD, seems a hoax, lastly only SOS Fairy Manu is produced by them, a short 10...
Click to read more »else to my knowledge. --IWI (talk) 03:29, 31 December 2020 (UTC) NOTE: This RfD will now also include Category:Senates. --IWI (talk) 15:28, 31 December 2020...
Click to read more »Since when do articles only have to claim notability to avoid deletion via RFD? I've only seen the claiming aspect in quick deletion requests, which is...
Click to read more »we want to go through RFD with them all. Thanks, Either way (talk) 14:41, 8 May 2010 (UTC) Let's turn the current RFD into an RFD on all the articles....
Click to read more »block tool. Edits Access to the delete tool is unrequired: six edits to RFD; only one of which is delete -- and only three show any independent thought...
Click to read more »Note - An IP user has made significant changes to this article since the RFD opened. CountryANDWestern (talk) 01:23, 20 June 2025 (UTC) Delete, Obviously...
Click to read more »Osiris (talk) 09:41, 2 December 2013 (UTC) Note to closing admin: If this rfd succeeds, this template's doc page should also be deleted. I apologize if...
Click to read more »the first nom), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:38, 10 April 2025 (UTC) Previous RFD: Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Zayid Bin Labid Al-Ansari...
Click to read more »going to suggest merging, they can just go ahead and do that without an RFD. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC) Mother 3 fan translation (edit...
Click to read more »also would have been very little effort -- even less than creating this RFD -- to just add a brief mention in the existing article. --Auntof6 (talk)...
Click to read more »Recent concentrations include mainspace work, DYK, community discussions and RFD. Admittedly there was a time of long inactivity, but most of us have had...
Click to read more »@Belwine Just feel free to give QD a go next time, if a sysop decline then we RFD it if necessary. Clear copyvios are always G12. :) Camouflaged Mirage (talk)...
Click to read more »users in this category have not edited since last month or before. If this rfd passes, I would want the category removed from the template. Auntof6 (talk)...
Click to read more »probably counterproductive. In short: A maintenance delete, going through RFD. Eptalon (talk) 18:53, 28 July 2013 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »I am no expert on the subject, I would prefer this goes through regular RFD. Personally, I tend towards deletion, though. Eptalon (talk) 12:44, 12 October...
Click to read more »or one of our rules. Removing warnings like {{complex}}, {{cleanup}} or {{RfD}} just because you think a page is yours is not right. No matter who you...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete - Eptalon, thanks for bringing this to RFD. However I attempted to research the subject of this article and was unable...
Click to read more »references.So...delete --Eptalon (talk) 16:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC) Similar Rfd was kept. Perhaps can be expanded? --A1Cafel (talk) 02:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »result of a DRV, this article has been restored for further discussion at RFD. The initial administrator deleted this article due to their belief that...
Click to read more »also state for the record a BEFORE search was conducted as it is with every RFD I make but as I said the Enwiki page didn't show up for me, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk...
Click to read more »voice and soap actors. There were several that I thought should be sent to RFD for a community review of their notability. Denton does not appear to be...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Procedural nomination -- This was tagged as an RFD by User:CharlieMehta in May but they did not complete the steps. I am completing...
Click to read more »Comment: On May 6, 2021 at 1626U time, IP address 105.192.86.211 removed the RFD template [1]. IP may be part of sock farm. PotsdamLamb (talk) 16:49, 6 May...
Click to read more »participate, but with RFDs, what is needed is reasons for and against keeping the page. "Per nom" refers to a reason already given. RFDs aren't votes, they're...
Click to read more »Top Gun X 4 (talk) 11:46, 25 February 2025 (UTC) Not Allowed to remove the RFD tag by yourself, Only the admin has right to remove the tag until the decision...
Click to read more »extending discussion for a few days because page wasn't included at the RfD page. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:35, 23 September 2018 (UTC) Keep I expanded the...
Click to read more »me I screwed up and where) 13:16, 16 January 2014 (UTC) Keep A difficult RFD to vote in. It does not follow the Simple English Wikipedia's practice of...
Click to read more »Can we get protection on this article please until the RFD is completed? IPs keep removing the RFD. PotsdamLamb (talk) 06:29, 7 May 2021 (UTC) @Auntof6:...
Click to read more »RfD -Griff (talk) 15:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Probably shouldn't have been moved during a discussion. But either way, moving it wouldn't end the Rfd...
Click to read more »Sarhan Shamran? Or is the content different so there is a need of RFD. Hope some admin can clarify. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 08:30, 5 November...
Click to read more »differently: A person doing the job he was trained for isn't notable. So: regular RFD... Eptalon (talk) 14:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not notable (per other painting rfd) Mwiqdoh (talk) 21:34, 13 December 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable...
Click to read more »the page, because it looks like it was only QD'd before, not deleted via RFD. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:52, 25 November 2018 (UTC) Delete a big part of this...
Click to read more »different name; I moved it back for the time being. Another user had removed the RFD template from the article; I put it back. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:32, 10 January...
Click to read more »SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Latter two brand new accounts voting on the same RFD. Top created the page and also voted. --IWI (talk) 04:36, 29 December 2020...
Click to read more »{{subst:uw-encopypaste}} Removing deletion requests from articles {{subst:uw-rfd}} Information on cross-wiki attribution {{subst:uw-encopyright}} Userpage...
Click to read more »closing admin, Waterfox is the nominator of this RFD. Waterfox, as nominator you don't have to come into the RFD and add a delete "vote," your nomination statement...
Click to read more »how, and/or 2) were made by users whose only edit here has been on this RFD or the related article, and some of those users have been indeffed for socking...
Click to read more »mistakes earlier on (he's been here since May 21, 2008), but were corrected (RfD tags instead of QD tags) and he has about 30 QD's, most of which were in...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage Tanbiruzzaman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:...
Click to read more »Fizz Programming language: Node.js Function: cleanups Description: maintain rfd list, stub links, and correct External links to Other websites , possibly...
Click to read more »does no harm. There is no valid reason to to either QD or delete through RFD.--Peterdownunder (talk) 00:11, 2 April 2011 (UTC) Schools can be notable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2019/Youssef Chreiba, علاء. I think a 2nd RFD is suitable to decide the keep / removal of this page....
Click to read more »2019 (UTC) This concerns pages at RFD being deleted under the following circumstances: The RFD is created in 2019 The RFD consensus is to delete the page...
Click to read more »20 February 2009 (UTC) I hate them because everywhere they're used (RFA, RFD) are places where there should be proper discussion, not just counting how...
Click to read more »there may be options that are not just "keep" or "delete", such as merging. RFD subpage created by Barras (talk), because Leathp (talk · contribs) forgot...
Click to read more »to be deleted. If the hoax is very obvious, it can be quickly deleted by adding {{Qd-hoax}} to the page. Otherwise, it can be listed at the RfD page....
Click to read more »(UTC) @Ternera: Please don't make that kind of change while an article is at RFD. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:49, 10 April 2025 (UTC) Got it. I can revert...
Click to read more »head of communications for the presidency is a claim. will need to go to rfd if you want to delete". Community to decide if this seems notablity. Camouflaged...
Click to read more »somewhat early as the article had been deleted by Macdonald-Ross whilst this RFD was still going - no one so far had objected to redirecting and I doubt it...
Click to read more »focused on RFDs, and while many of their opinions are w:WP:PERNOM-like comments, Special:Diff/9931930 shows a stronger interest than other RFDs. The 4th...
Click to read more »nominated for such an award several times. FatalFit, please keep in mind that RfD is not a vote. As Wikipedia:Requests for deletion#Discussion points out,...
Click to read more »watch · logs · delete) rfd talk Daisy Johnson (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) rfd talk Inhumans (edit...
Click to read more »(UTC) Feel free to do so. If someone does so, I'd be happy to withdraw this RFD. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:18, 1 January 2013 (UTC) It would have taken you less...
Click to read more »nomination from J991. Also with apologies for screwing up your original RFD. That'll teach me not to mess with things I can't fix! DaneGeld (talk) 20:04...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Question: @Rathfelder: RFD is for proposing deletion, but this sounds like a proposal to rename. Please...
Click to read more »soft delete usually means a delete when there has been no discussion on an RFD. It means that the page can be recreated with no prejudice if someone wants...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nomination. I put the other articles from the user up for RFD as well. THe user is blocked at English Wikipedia for the same promotional...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep per Fehufanga. I will suggest you BigKrow to avoid unnecessary rfd. NXcrypto Chatting 16:45, 25 January 2025 (UTC) Sorry BigKrow (talk) 17:46...
Click to read more »and make use of WP:AN for more complicated requests. I also take part in RFD discussions. I help new users, unless they are vandals. I am familiar with...
Click to read more »Both users Bamalli01 Lagwai having similar behaviour as they are removing Rfd/Qd on this page and on Enyi Ben-Eboh आकाशJhaJi 22:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »obviously. Desertborn (talk) 18:45, 4 May 2021 (UTC) I have removed the RFD from the page as it is an archive of simple talk and needs to remain. If...
Click to read more »that useful, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 18:35, 28 June 2017 (UTC) Ah I thought RFD was "Redirects for Deletion" ..... Just for clarity then the above is a redirect...
Click to read more »Zaxxon0 (talk) 18:26, 18 January 2020 (UTC) Quickly Delete Why is this an rfd? Computer Fizz (talk) 20:36, 18 January 2020 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »article does not fall under an appropriate QD category, therefore referred to RFD. DaneGeld (talk) 08:01, 16 October 2017 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »unsigned comment added by ShadowBallX (talk • contribs) There is no need for RFD, since it's an empty category, C1 applies. If copy-pasted without attribution...
Click to read more »November 2021 (UTC) Also, would like to include following movies in this RFD for the same reason: Kokusai himitsu keisatsu: Tora no kiba Kokusai himitsu...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Note to closing admin - if the outcome of this RFD is to keep, the article should be moved to Steven R. Jones. --IWI (talk)...
Click to read more »— Preceding unsigned comment added by Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk • contribs) At RFD pages, please use Keep or Delete to show your opinions. MathXplore (talk)...
Click to read more »can never be completed. It can never become an encyclopaedic list. enwp RFD Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote...
Click to read more »any further based on comments the IPs made in the rev del conversation and RfD. Link is here User talk:Macdonald-ross#EFEM article deletion thanks. PDLTalk...
Click to read more »please remember to remove closed RFDs from the RFD page. Exert 21:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC) I prefer to leave them on the RFD page for about 12-24 hours time...
Click to read more »such as merging. Clerk note: I've added this request for deletion to WP:RFD as it was never previously added here before when this was first created...
Click to read more »should ave their own article. In addition, the list of hackers ìs also up for RFD. 🄰🄽🄸🄼🄰🄻 🄴🄳🄸🅃🄾🅁 - 𝙇𝙚𝙩'𝙨 𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠 (talk) 20:11, 29 December...
Click to read more »notable. --82.46.44.65 (talk) 14:23, 4 December 2020 (UTC) Comment: As the Rfd temoplate was repeatedly removed I havbe semi-protected the page; you'll...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep - Per TheAafi. Also, an early administrative closure of this RFD may be appropriate as it was created by a banned sockpuppet. Griff (talk)...
Click to read more ») StevenJ81 (talk) 16:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC) I would leave this to an Rfd. Being a geographic location it doesn't really meet any QD and it is reasonable...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. @Eptalon: There was already an Rfd for Caveginia Primary School and Dore Numa College this year: Wikipedia:Requests...
Click to read more »been fixed instead of requiring the time of several other editors at the RFD process. The article is now sourced and has a photo. Griff (talk) 17:32,...
Click to read more »a recreation of a previously-deleted article on EN. There's probably an RFD on EN if someone were to go digging for it. Simple is not the place to put...
Click to read more »The article has a source now. Is it a stub? Absolutely. Does it meet A1 or RFD criteria? No. I understand that short articles provide little value to the...
Click to read more »Hello, I just delted Energy conservation at home/Saving energy at home (per RFD; it can be found in Simple Wikibooks here. one of the pages that link to...
Click to read more »this and have already closed the RfD. If a page is already deleted before you've created the RfD, you can request the RfD for quick deletion under G6. --Ferien...
Click to read more »default to that unless there is clear consensus to do otherwise (and an RFD discussion 10 years ago doesn't count). The issue I have is with categorising...
Click to read more »countless accounts and spamming. Some I had nominated at RFD, rest if you want can send to RFD if necessary. Most are notable though. --Camouflaged Mirage...
Click to read more »Not sure I understand the point of removing the QD tag then sending to rfd for the same reason. --Gotanda (talk) 23:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »notability guidelines. Mark Rekon Mohammad Amin Nejat, please note that RfD is an open discussion. Going forward, if you are found to make any further...
Click to read more »June 2019 (UTC) Keep Notability is not temporary. It does need cleanup but Rfd is not for cleanup. That being said, if it is a copy paste it needs its attribution...
Click to read more »