Redirect to:
To propose an article for Good article status, just add it to the top of the list using the code, filling out 'page title' and 'reason' with your proposed...
Click to read more »press are clear PR pieces. The ones in Forbes are not by one of their staff writers but by Cheryl Conner who runs a PR agency: "SnappConner PR ranks among...
Click to read more »this article. It is promotional and seems a little inflated. It smacks of PR or off-wiki resume padding. That being said, this reference is probably enough...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Sources are tinged with PR (or outright PR), and so are not proper evidence of notability. Too little evidence...
Click to read more »spam by an xwiki lta, no meaningful in depth coverage, everything is paid PR or passing mentions Praxidicae (talk) 15:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »More on the Dagcoin scam here. The "sources" in the article here are all PR plants, not independent publications, and they are all devoted to advertising...
Click to read more »Company started in February this year! Sources are either named PR sources or shills for PR. Could and probably should have been offered for QD (IMO). Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:REVIEWWP:REVIEW WP:PRWP:PR This page is a place to get comments and peer review from other Wikipedians on Wikipedia pages. For comments on...
Click to read more »article is significant, in fact most of hte sources are based off of the same PR piece flooded to the sources by what is likely their manager. this is a local...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Non-notable "translator". All of the sources are PR pieces or interviews. His Turkish page was protected from creation (now re-created...
Click to read more »Notability of authors is not proved by the size of their books. Sources are PR puffs, not serious independent assessments of merit. Macdonald-ross (talk)...
Click to read more »professional critics. Biog put up by probable PR, as is a subsequent edit. Not on En wiki. Looks like a PR-posted cv-type bio. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:47...
Click to read more »advertising the person without showing independent evidence of notability. Typical PR-type product. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC) Keep. He's india's...
Click to read more »simplification, so it is not just a copy paste. Also the article is not just a PR promotion, so not spam either. No grounds to delete. Peterdownunder (talk)...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG, sources are PR/puff pieces. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fela Akinse /...
Click to read more »page does not show this, and it must. Rehashing PR-type clips does not do it. If you take out all the PR clips, there's no refs left. That's why the page...
Click to read more »actually, the PR process is different. At WP:P(V)GA articles are voted with consensus of the community to promote or demote an article. At WP:PR, usually one...
Click to read more »"sources" are two blogs that are clearly advertising and pr. No byline for authors by name on these pr blogs, so no accountability. No coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Likely another PR attempt. Sources are unreliable and the page has no significant claim. BRP...
Click to read more »entrepreneur and businessman, the page fails GNG, and looks like another PR attempt. From what I see, it could likely be paid editing. BRP ever 12:21...
Click to read more »the reason: Non-notable business person. Deleted twice on EnWP. Coverage is PR and promotional business "awards." Gotanda (talk) 22:00, 4 October 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Part of a long-going PR spam. BRP ever 11:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »but the org itself does not have any notability. Coverage are mainly puff/PR pieces. Infogapp1 (talk) 11:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »notability it is completely incompetent. This guy should get himself a better PR! Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:07, 10 May 2021 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: No Notability found Other link are self Published or PR links. Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. Not notable, sources of low validity. In fact, sources are PR links and repeats of handouts. Way not notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:21...
Click to read more »this comedian. A lot of the sources used in this articles look like blatant PR or content scrapers - at least 6 of them have titles like "Biography, Age...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Not notable: PR promotion-type. Individual lacks suitable independent awards or critiques...
Click to read more »notable. All the stories look like they're straight out of the subject's PR machine and very CV/promotional in nature. Infogapp1 (talk) 15:34, 21 August...
Click to read more »notable person. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 20:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC) Delete PR puff sources, delete this one. DIVINE 21:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »coverage. The Broadway World article seemed promising but it’s a very puff, PR type piece. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:54, 16 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete The majority of sources are PR puff, and the article looks like an advertisement. DIVINE 20:59, 13 April...
Click to read more »Not notable, no significant coverage from reliable and independent sources. PR fluff and all that. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 21:51, 17 June 2022 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »Note the editor has put up marginal not notable biogs before, and may be a PR paid editor. See record of Draft:Celai West on En wiki. Macdonald-ross (talk)...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: News coverage seem to mostly consist of PR fluff and/or gossip. Has a minor role in a drama series and a participant...
Click to read more »publicity. No claim for notability, no evidence of notability, looks like a PR handout... this person has hardly started his career, and yet here we are...
Click to read more »be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. Another PR puff, delete as not notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:43, 28 August 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »May 2018 (UTC) Delete. No proper grounds for notability. This reads like a PR handout, and probably is. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:05, 28 May 2018 (UTC) Reads...
Click to read more »(talk) 04:47, 23 June 2015 (UTC) Delete. Not notable, and reads like a PR statement. Virtually unknown, and could be a hoax. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:28...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete, non notable, PR. Кронас (talk) 10:11, 1 April 2025 (UTC) Delete I agree with the proposer...
Click to read more »reason: No significant coverage, all I can see the sources are interviews and pr. Fails WP:NMUSICIAN and WP:GNG as well. 🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN (💬) 06:51, 23 September...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. All the links I checked were to PR handouts, magazine articles and other sources which have little or no status...
Click to read more »there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Typical PR promotion. A clear-cut case: the young lady's achievements are not notable...
Click to read more »merging. Delete. Young actress, about six years' experience. This is just PR which flatters but does not prove notability. Most of the text is just fluff...
Click to read more »there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete, PR and cross-wiki spam, no have sources. Кронас (talk) 10:08, 1 April 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »user-generated or PR pieces, including those on HighBeam to which I have a subscription. They are clearly labeled there as the source being PR Newswire. Note...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete not notable, absolutely no coverage outside show PR or social media fr33kman 03:11, 27 October 2025 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »about a non-notable person. Ravensfire (talk) 14:49, 29 September 2023 (UTC) Pr.yogiville (talk) 14:57, 5 October 2023 (UTC)I would like to edit the article...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, sources are PR pieces. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baanty. --Ferien (talk...
Click to read more »coverage. Little mention in most cited source. Others are primary sources and pr. Fails in any notability criteria. 🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN (💬) 10:00, 30 September...
Click to read more »--KP70D (talk) 19:33, 31 March 2025 (UTC) Delete, advertising, look like PR. Кронас (talk) 10:09, 1 April 2025 (UTC) Delete It is apparently an advertising...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. Reads like a PR puff from the company. Lack of evidence of notability, and lack of independent...
Click to read more »bit about Khuri in the context of his stylist. All the others are marked as PR or is an interview. Aranya (talk) 14:43, 6 November 2021 (UTC) Delete yet...
Click to read more »suggests notability. Unfortunately, all the refs are repeats or edits of his PR handout, which has obviously been sent to all of them (this from the almost...
Click to read more »such as the piece in Maxim magazine, appear to be written directly by a PR firm. Leads me to believe this is just a promotional piece, and the subject...
Click to read more »of articles. None of the sources are significant coverage. Some are just PR fluff and miscellaneous biographical trivia such as zodiac sign and marital...
Click to read more »22:54, 24 February 2017 (UTC) Delete. Machine translation of some hoax or PR stuff. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:10, 25 February 2017 (UTC) Delete (I'd have...
Click to read more »attested by reliable sources. They are not for start-ups which consist of a few PR notices and no track record. Not on En, and should be deleted here. Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Looks like another PR attempt. The person is likely not notable, and the article fails GNG. BRP...
Click to read more »security). BZPN (talk) 22:44, 9 January 2025 (UTC) Delete, non notable, PR. Кронас (talk) 23:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC) This request is due to close on...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete. A fairly obvious copy-paste with no sources at all, PR puffery and advertisement, unwikified, no satisfactory grounds for notability...
Click to read more »the general public, the girl is little known in London! This is obviously a PR puff, and as such very well done. Basically, lists of work done by models...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. A blatant piece of PR work. Notability not dealt with explicitly at all. Except for certain special...
Click to read more »the community thinks. All comments will be of help. Thanks, I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 03:00, 3 March 2010 (UTC) A better forum for this would be an Wikipedia:Editor...
Click to read more »subject fails WP:GNG. "Matthew Peters is an entrepreneur and expert in SEO and PR, known as the founder and CEO of Search Manipulator, an online reputation...
Click to read more »Also, not on En wiki, and page put up in one go by newly registered editor (PR?). Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:51, 3 April 2019 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »nominator. BZPN (talk) 10:41, 8 January 2025 (UTC) Delete, non notable, PR. Кронас (talk) 23:04, 10 January 2025 (UTC) keep He can comfortably pass basic...
Click to read more »It's like another PR, which didn't work, therefore this won't either. I know I wouldn't be helping there as I didn't do it much at PR either. So far you...
Click to read more »learnt not to trust Indian newspapers and magazines because they publish PR handouts. However, his appointment as a "Tribune of the People" is interesting...
Click to read more »G11 category, authored by what looks to be the artist themselves and their PR agent. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 21:49, 20 December 2020 (UTC) Delete It seems...
Click to read more »Quantum4 Send me a message 16:31, 20 February 2010 (UTC) --I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 21:53, 20 February 2010 (UTC) Just be careful because we admins are lazy...
Click to read more »Time and effort went into these discussions, and this is just one of several PR attempts to promote the person after our decisions. Macdonald-ross (talk)...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Sources are PR articles, P blurbs, passing mentions or articles by Schiller. Not enough sources...
Click to read more »sources, oddly, for someone who is based in the Middle East. Suggests to me a PR attempt to increase "hits" for her utilizing the lax journalistic standards...
Click to read more »deletion/Rhonda Vetere (2nd nomination), the bulk of the sources here are PR type pieces with little claim at notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 19:51...
Click to read more »CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC) Delete I'm sure a PR team could have written a more positive article, but not by much. The promotional...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: After removing the really obvious AI generated PR pieces and promotional churnalism, this is a promotional article about a new...
Click to read more »significance of these awards. I see this as one of many pages that get put up by PR agents for the benefit of their client(s). Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:40, 15...
Click to read more »Thanks 39.41.144.183 (talk) 21:28, 30 November 2021 (UTC) Delete Spam by PR, and not a good one at that. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:46, 7 December 2021...
Click to read more »quality (or other notoriety). Otherwise we become just agents of the item's PR clamour. It's not as though we're dealing with a well-known property here...
Click to read more »significant media. Recipient of a bunch of prizes that are pretty clearly PR/promotional exercises. Please delete. --Gotanda (talk) 07:05, 4 June 2018...
Click to read more »merging. Delete - Coverage doesn't establish his notability, I'm seeing PR fluff and gossip. Winning a competition isn't a ticket to notability. — *Fehufangą...
Click to read more »not notable –Morneo06 (talk) 21:06, 12 September 2021 (UTC) Quick delete PR MagicalNight97 (talk) 02:33, 13 September 2021 (UTC) Delete. All sources...
Click to read more »and failure to establish notability, despite the plethora of duplicative PR/puff pieces added by the paid editor who created the original version of this...
Click to read more »her early 30's and the mentions of her in the references are brief and/or PR puff pieces. The movie she "starred" in was an 18-minute short with several...
Click to read more »here, this also has a promotional tint, whether self-promotional or via a PR. Anyway not notable per Chenzw. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:11, 2 March 2018...
Click to read more »little notability. The references are all in Mandarin, but are obviously PR hypes. There's nothing like a proper critical review, so I go for delete.— Preceding...
Click to read more »2024 (UTC) You are right. Whole article looks like self promotion for links, PR. Most of those awards are pay to participate. Apennyspent (talk) 08:06, 29...
Click to read more »media coverage in a reliable, general market publication--not just blogs and PR sites. Gotanda (talk) 04:20, 13 June 2018 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »source is also just "we heard she's going to play this role on this show" PR puff. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:02, 28 February 2026 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »accepted: Company websites, press releases and investor relations materials PR and press release distribution services Social media accounts and promotional...
Click to read more »coverage. IWI (chat) 05:55, 30 June 2020 (UTC) Comment I might have used a few PR but the company does meet NCORP. You will find independent news coverage if...
Click to read more »first of all. The "references" are vapid PR puffs. I don't mind anyone disagreeing with the proposal, but if PR puffs are references, where will it all...
Click to read more »with SEO spam, and the sources in the article are either routine coverage, PR or unreliable. One must wonder why some of these sources are no longer available...
Click to read more »very promotional tone towards the subject, which makes me believe they are PR. The source for his collaboration is routine coverage. It can be used to cite...
Click to read more »talking about a kickstarter campaign for a relatively small amount of money for PR purchases. Not what I'd expect to see for a notable artist. Gordonrox24 | Talk...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete as not notable. Typical PR posting for a mid-career person with minor awards. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:30...
Click to read more »(talk) 03:56, 28 April 2019 (UTC) This is a type we see more and more of: a PR edit to advertise the individual and the organisation. See history for who...
Click to read more »the awards themselves need to be assessed as suitable evidence, because the PR industry has invented many awards specifically to bamboozle the public! Article...
Click to read more »no other edits here; reads like a promotion of the subject, possibly by a PR agent. Not notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:21, 17 September 2020 (UTC) Already...
Click to read more »merging. Delete. Clearly not notable. The page has all the hallmarks of a PR handout for someone who has so far achieved very little. Macdonald-ross (talk)...
Click to read more »24 June 2022 (UTC) Yes, but "First ladies" is not a title. It's more of a PR gimmick or slogan. I don't know of any country which has an official designation...
Click to read more »generated. These are not reliable sources, they're just marketing junk that his PR team paid to get on the sites. Ravensfire (talk) 02:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »merging. Delete Wikialpha is a copy of Wikipedia and a place to publish PR/Spam/Garbage, with other references being self-generated sources. However...
Click to read more »published on different websites, so not reliable press coverage and most likely PR. Does not meet Wikipedia:Notability_(music) in any way. Gotanda (talk) 06:00...
Click to read more »Planeteers which links to Captain Planet, thus no longer orphaned. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 20:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC) My bad1 It is still orphaned. There needs to...
Click to read more »Would have been better to delete the original list: we can surely rely on the PR industry resubmitting any who get more notable. It's not as if we're ever...
Click to read more »had him before under some guise. WP is a big target for self-promoters and PR agencies, and we should delete this one quickly. Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:22...
Click to read more »not suitable as it is now: vastly too complicated language. Reads like a PR handout. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:53, 18 July 2023 (UTC) Speedy delete cross-wiki...
Click to read more »Crystal ball: the shooting has not yet started, the sources are copies of PR fliers, there cannot be any evidence of quality, and who knows when it will...
Click to read more »are not significant coverage. He appears to be a quote machine with a good PR operation. Featured coach is an interview and typically paid promotion. Stylecraze...
Click to read more »articles ([1], [2]) and claimed that they both were self-published articles or PR article on contrary, both articles are investigative and critical pieces that...
Click to read more »winery. I can find no in-depth independent coverage of this winery. It's all PR-based, and that includes interviews with the owner plugging the company. In...
Click to read more »any mention of, other than the obvious sites controlled by Wadile or his PR team. Not helping with notability. Entrepreneur of a website that self-claims...
Click to read more »thought you were an admin. You sure act like one. So, yes. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 15:34, 17 March 2010 (UTC) One of the people who will help to keep up...
Click to read more »Winter Olympics? And why aren't any of them tagged with RfD? I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 15:32, 12 March 2010 (UTC) No comment on the first query, however, the...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - Not notable, has added all hoax info, he is simply paying all PR things and why are you wasting 7 days this piece of hoax shit. Don’t delete...
Click to read more »but this is an obvious use of WP for the purposes of advertisement and P.R. Actually, it's almost a textbook case of what wanna-bees expect from their...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Most of the sources look like PR or self-published. Appears to fail WP:ORG DIVINE 21:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Not notable. Account which created the page is probably PR, and previous pages were also v. borderline on notability. Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »15 March 2010 (UTC) Support A good, helpful user. Why not? I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 22:17, 15 March 2010 (UTC) Support Although I'm not too active here,...
Click to read more »c.v. with the intention of advertising the person. Probably placed by a P.R. firm. Lacks independent verification, and lacks independent evidence of...
Click to read more »trend and the like Has.kka66 (talk) 22:53, 25 December 2021 (UTC) Delete PR spam. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:28, 22 December 2021 (UTC) Delete undisclosed...
Click to read more »and their in need of a drummer if anyone's interested. ;) I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 15:28, 12 March 2010 (UTC) Keep per Ion.--Sinbad (talk) 15:52, 12 March...
Click to read more »March 2010 (UTC) Strong delete. Just close this discussion. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 02:23, 12 March 2010 (UTC) This request is due to close seven days after...
Click to read more »review. For example, the SuccessMagazine [2], no byline and it reads like a PR team wrote the piece. Multiple other sources have the same cautionary signs...
Click to read more »and recognition" section was an utter joke, full of promotional fluff and PR marketing speak. The sources are iffy, using the same w:WP:NEWSORGINDIA paid/sponsored...
Click to read more »media coverage in a reliable, general market publication--not just blogs and PR sites. Gotanda (talk) 04:20, 13 June 2018 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »because his wealth is not so unusual. Of course, rich people can always get PR agents! Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC) Keep Being rich...
Click to read more »- They mean about the same thing. Its close enough for me. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 18:58, 22 February 2010 (UTC) Change - it's in the basic 1000 (or some...
Click to read more »Megan|talkchanges 13:14, 20 February 2010 (UTC) Delete per nom --I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 23:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC) This request is due to close seven days...
Click to read more »would be my point exactly. Couldn't of said it better myself. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 17:41, 26 March 2010 (UTC) With so much censorship going on at government...
Click to read more »sources are good enough to support notability and which are just fan blogs, PR farms, and gossip sites (Update: Especially for entertainers / entertainment)...
Click to read more »think it mainly refers to the fact that so many people and companies use PR agents to try and shoehorn their way onto WP. The basic problem with this...
Click to read more »rules out puff pieces submitted by them, friends, family, management, labels, pr teams, etc. Basically a reliable source needs to think people would want to...
Click to read more »August 2022 (UTC) Delete. This is a fairly obvious promotion designed by a PR pro, I would say. The photo is a giveaway! Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:03, 21...
Click to read more »Featured article procedure. -- Netoholic @ 20:47, 29 September 2006 (UTC) WP:PR states that "if you see an excellent article here, add {{vgood}} to the page"...
Click to read more »Ditto. --Diego let's talk 22:37, 28 March 2010 (UTC) Merge --I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 22:43, 28 March 2010 (UTC) Merge or keep it as it is now I'm working...
Click to read more »Business magazines are not reliable sources because their existence depends on PR handouts by companies. Journalists in general are always desperate for "copy"...
Click to read more »So please Delete Udit Dixit It’s also look like promotional and like paid pr. Sir Fixing26 can you please provide a list of reliable source.Mekiakaro (talk)...
Click to read more »problem here is the lack of good sources. I've already removed the obvious paid/pr articles as w:WP:NEWSORGINDIA [1]. The oneindia.com and firstindia.co.in sources...
Click to read more »not, and we can follow. I think we're right to anticipate intrusion by paid PR agents into any kind of entry path to Wikipedias. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:26...
Click to read more »about the consensus, but this editor's mind is changing. Many advertisers and PR agents hide behind moving IPs. Children at school are also IPs. A large percentage...
Click to read more »specific thing or article, I have extra time. We really need to either revive PR, or create a new message board or such (without cluttering this page) for...
Click to read more »The problem occurs most with show-biz/media type biogs, often puffed up by PR agents and fans. We should not allow an elastic term like "model" to be used...
Click to read more »thing is common practice here. Note also,we common have articles on animals pr plants on their common English name, and redirect from the binominal one....
Click to read more »(UTC) Yes, that is what I meant. Obviously an attempt has been made for a PR agent to promote this person in return for cash. The spamming on En wiki is...
Click to read more »settings. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:31, 5 January 2012 (UTC) In much the same light as PR, Editor review is dead. Its been dead for months, or longer, and a good doctor...
Click to read more »you! Nikolai Kurbatov (talk) 08:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC) Delete, typical PR/advertising that they stubbornly want to place. Nikolai Kurbatov is trying...
Click to read more »independence by being based on sources which back up claims. This is just a PR stunt. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »to see if the brand is real? It just needs minor clean up. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 15:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC) I think you mean this link. That article however...
Click to read more »--Gordonrox24 | Talk 22:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC) Keep per Gordonrox24. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 01:17, 19 March 2010 (UTC) Comment Are we discussing the redirect or...
Click to read more »though it is a legit news site, is noted as a paid article. It's in the "PR News" section, and there's not even an author listed. And most of these articles...
Click to read more »criterion on BIO / ACTOR ? Are the awards notable themselves. This seems puff up PR spam and the language isn't that neutral either. Leaving for community to...
Click to read more »Swaroop, the "sources" are a business blog that is clearly advertising and pr. One of those stories isn't primarily about the program. No coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »assessments, but PR puffs. Not notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 05:17, 15 October 2021 (UTC) need an explaination on how the sources are PR PUFF and not notable...
Click to read more »actor in a video application called "Josh" and Instagram reels. Looks like PR. For me, I still need some additional references to pass it for notability...
Click to read more »mentioned. Articles that do not approach the GA criterion should be listed at WP:PR, please. –Juliancolton | Talk 20:58, 10 September 2009 (UTC) Moved from the...
Click to read more »id=202409200834PR_NEWS_USPR_____PH10819 https://www.morningstar.com/news/pr-newswire/20240827ph91209/wsandn-sets-sights-on-ending-ukraine-russia-and-...
Click to read more »18:45, 28 September 2011 (UTC) But its a requirement that articles gets a PR. Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 20:47, 28 September 2011 (UTC) I actually meant to...
Click to read more »say so. What we actually have is a storm of PR hype which passes muster only with the innocent. Remember, PR guys are out to earn money, and they orchestrate...
Click to read more »as a "sponsored" post, and the Deccan Herald article is filed under their PR Spot column. The Forbes post is not suitable according to WP:FORBESCON. The...
Click to read more »"leading" and "best selling" are typical claims. Not notable. Sources are PR journalism at its most trivial. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:34, 19 February 2016...
Click to read more »by his behaviour towards me, I'm somewhat uncomfortable with him being a PR capacity. As for the latter, it would help if I wasn't treated as a ticking...
Click to read more »the metric system in France with no more than a quarter of that to French PR problems in selling the system to their own people. DeFacto's puppets refused...
Click to read more »04:10, 4 September 2009 (UTC) Again for the same reason we notify the WMF PR team. Because anything we say can be picked up by the press etc. -DJSasso...
Click to read more »--Gordonrox24 | Talk 16:42, 20 February 2010 (UTC) Keep per Gordonrox24. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 23:07, 20 February 2010 (UTC) Keepr per Gordon's improvements; still...
Click to read more »the others don't exist, but a matter of making the others. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 00:02, 21 March 2010 (UTC) As clarification: I put it up here so I could...
Click to read more »Xenon (Xe) Caesium (Cs) Barium (Ba) Lanthanum (La) Cerium (Ce) Praseodymium (Pr) Neodymium (Nd) Promethium (Pm) Samarium (Sm) Europium (Eu) Gadolinium (Gd)...
Click to read more »she stars in are notable either. Coverage about her I could find seem to be PR fluff. And a note here: Wikitia is essentially a pay-for-promotion wiki. —...
Click to read more »contribs) 17:08, 17 November 2020 (UTC) Delete Not notable: the supports are PR puffs, and the page is a promotion. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:40, 19 November...
Click to read more »Os Ot Ou Ov Ow Ox Oy Oz Pa Pb Pc Pd Pe Pf Pg Ph Pi Pj Pk Pl Pm Pn Po Pp Pq Pr Ps Pt Pu Pv Pw Px Py Pz Qa Qb Qc Qd Qe Qf Qg Qh Qi Qj Qk Ql Qm Qn Qo Qp Qq...
Click to read more »for the reason: Lacks evidence of notability. This well-written page by a PR agent shows the subject to be qualified and competent, but not clearly notable...
Click to read more »with vested interest advertising a company. If we allowed this to stand, PR accounts all over the world would flood us with company descriptions. Editors...
Click to read more »PR is dead, but I'm hoping I can get a brief overview of what the article needs before proposing it at VGA. Also, I want to template the lead from this...
Click to read more »his getting high and shooting two people as symbolic. where it not for a PR campaign, he would be less than a footnote in history. He is well below "relatively...
Click to read more »news is manufactured by the media, who are always short of content, and by PR firms. Much of the page could be summarised as "he's popular on local TV"...
Click to read more »can. :) fr33kman 05:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC) Delete per nom. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 16:50, 17 March 2010 (UTC) Keep Could we stop nominating articles for...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:39, 21 February 2010 (UTC) Delete per Slipknot1. --I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 16:14, 21 February 2010 (UTC) Delete: We're a Wikipedia, not a missing...
Click to read more »redirect" to Simple wiktionary word work and be done with it? I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 02:27, 12 March 2010 (UTC) Keep per Purplebackpack89 --Peterdownunder...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) NatelieamericaPR (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user ·...
Click to read more »Now that the article is cleaned up, no need for deletion. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 01:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC) Keep Since the article is cleaned up (thanks...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep Just some minor clean up, and it is notable IMO. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 23:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC) Delete This topic is not broad enough....
Click to read more »later. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 16:39, 8 March 2010 (UTC) I have added 9 refs in total. I hope this is enough. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 19:02, 10 March 2010...
Click to read more »primary? ~2025-69656-7 (talk) 12:07, 23 September 2025 (UTC) Interviews, pr, this references are defined as primary source. 🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN (💬) 12:13...
Click to read more »Xenon (Xe) Caesium (Cs) Barium (Ba) Lanthanum (La) Cerium (Ce) Praseodymium (Pr) Neodymium (Nd) Promethium (Pm) Samarium (Sm) Europium (Eu) Gadolinium (Gd)...
Click to read more »rewrote this article it had 2 references: https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/jr/press/ https://victimsofcrime.org/help-for-crime-victims/get-help-bull...
Click to read more »blackhat SEO sources, unreliable or press releases as a result of a massive PR campaign by the subject. No independent or indepth coverage. Praxidicae (talk)...
Click to read more »find="\b([rR])e(?:p(?:es+[ae]?[ent]+|p[pr]*es+[ae]?[ent]+|r(?:es+[ae]?[ent]+|[pr]+es+[ae]?[ent]+|sent))|r[pr]*es+[ae]?[ent]+)(?<!epres(?:ent|se))(ati(...
Click to read more »As If We Search The Person With His Skill Such As Bhaskar Sharma (Doctor) Pr Bhaskar Sharma (Homeopathy) It Has Enough Reliable Resources To Get Eligible...
Click to read more »thinking, but the PVGA page is for articles that are basically ready. See WP:PR for community building. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 16:23, 23 November 2008...
Click to read more »the article does meet all other points. I didn't want to nominate it for WP:PR because I already nominated four articles and I don't want to overwhelm users...
Click to read more »indefinitely from the English Wikipedia as a sockpuppet of LiteralKa (Head of GNAA PR), who in turn has been blocked for a myriad of reasons including COI/POV pushing...
Click to read more »relate to home keys. In a nutshell: Its completely useless. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 13:47, 18 March 2010 (UTC) Keep and move Home keys to Home row. This...
Click to read more »these problems and I will support the article in promotion. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 02:31, 19 February 2010 (UTC) The length of the article has nothing to...
Click to read more »have that much. I will also try to help if new tasks come up. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 14:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC) Number of refs depend on the size of the...
Click to read more »Either way (talk) 22:20, 10 March 2010 (UTC) Yes. Please do. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 23:17, 10 March 2010 (UTC) Keep per DJSasso, and the sources Either way...
Click to read more »Reliable Sources Beyond Press Releases While some earlier references (e.g., OpenPR, PRLog) are press releases and should be treated cautiously, there are additional...
Click to read more »July 2009 (UTC) Well, perhaps WP:PR should be re-opened? –Juliancolton | Talk 17:11, 15 July 2009 (UTC) Please, PR immediately. I'm ready to review it...
Click to read more »mentioned. Articles that do not approach the GA criterion should be listed at WP:PR, please. –Juliancolton | Talk 20:58, 10 September 2009 (UTC) Closed: currently...
Click to read more »globalcitizen.org/en/connect/coloresperanza/?utm_source=pressrelease&utm_medium=pr&utm_campaign=global_coloresperanza_emailsignup&utm_content=ctasignup_link...
Click to read more »https://natnatselmalanggen.blogspot.com/?fbclid=IwAR20Eu7GUIlf1SZUfcPw-0f__uSiK4IchNlTQ6wvyMmPrIp7NaKQ5E4E7WM List Of University Of Colorado Boulder Alumni List Of University...
Click to read more »October 2011 (UTC) Can you guys point these out? (That's why I voted to keep WP:PR). Secondly, I'll remove that and put in the background section. Jonayo! Selena...
Click to read more »a clean-up of the page. Hazard-SJ Talk 09:36, 28 July 2010 (UTC) I think PR is only for articles. Regards, Pmlineditor ∞ 09:38, 28 July 2010 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »ISO_3166/data/PF 38 ISO_3166/data/PM 39 ISO_3166/data/PN 40 ISO_3166/data/PR 41 ISO_3166/data/RE 42 ISO_3166/data/SJ 43 ISO_3166/data/SX 44 ISO_3166/data/TC...
Click to read more »on this again. He is a quote machine which is perhaps the outcome of good PR. But none of those articles are about him or his company. Some of the sources...
Click to read more »15:22, 6 August 2023 (UTC) @A09, I think it's more likely that there's a PR group that they are a part of that's been trying to push articles here. I...
Click to read more »(UTC) Could I have a second opinion on "Alisa Genevieve", whom I believe is a PR agent putting up clients? Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:59, 1 June 2023 (UTC) @Macdonald-ross:...
Click to read more »That the government and the main stream media are putting a lid on it (for PR/public anger prevention) doesn't mean it didn't happen. Reinoud (talk) 09:19...
Click to read more »French 3 German 4 (Japan) Japanese 5 (Russia, former USSR) Russian 7 (China, PR) 957/986 (Taiwan, ROC) 962/988 (Hong Kong, SAR) 981 (Singapore) 99937 (Macau...
Click to read more »a major, reliable news source is required for this. Too much evidence of PR and content placement. Should remain deleted. --Gotanda (talk) 05:38, 27 December...
Click to read more »Os Ot Ou Ov Ow Ox Oy Oz Pa Pb Pc Pd Pe Pf Pg Ph Pi Pj Pk Pl Pm Pn Po Pp Pq Pr Ps Pt Pu Pv Pw Px Py Pz Qa Qb Qc Qd Qe Qf Qg Qh Qi Qj Qk Ql Qm Qn Qo Qp Qq...
Click to read more »also created by Akash Mukherjee Edits. At best, there's meatpuppetry from a PR group trying to post articles here for non-notable people. I suspect they...
Click to read more »