Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following one or more categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Use the talk page when you are not sure or when you want to suggest a change. Shortcuts WP:NPOVWP:NPOV WP:NPVWP:NPV WP:NEUTRALWP:NEUTRAL WP:POVWP:POV...
Click to read more »Point of View (POV) railroading, or POV railroad as titled, is the use of bullying tactics to discredit an editor with an opposing viewpoint or to take...
Click to read more »Civil POV-pushing involves being polite while displaying some or all of the following behavior: Editing primarily or entirely on one topic or theme. Edit...
Click to read more »negative or positive views, in the section, and does not limit the text into a "POV funnel" which would restrict the contents. Some words, such as "criticism"...
Click to read more »for us to expand into the English version and subsequently here. This is POV laden and must go.--Cohaf (talk) 11:39, 15 March 2019 (UTC) I don’t think...
Click to read more »and ridicules those who believe in it, giving only one POV but refusing to allow their own POV in response to even be heard. This is completely unacceptable...
Click to read more »Result: Deleted - not SE, likely POV, GDFL issues, sockpuppetry found in voting. Swatjester (talk) has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:...
Click to read more »us reason together. has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: POV mini-essay, not really about international relations Please discuss this...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: English is grammatically poor and difficult to read. POV is very far from neutral. If it is kept, its proper name would be Flag of...
Click to read more »sounding like you are writing your own point of view. It is often called POV-pushing. Sometimes Wikipedians think a writer was biased on purpose and that...
Click to read more »upstream so it can be shared with the rest of the Wikimedia community It is POV. The POV of the editor-in-chief Wikizine is small in the number of staff members...
Click to read more »pushing my POV because I'm not of that POV. @lauryn, you're right I shouldn't have reverted I should have discussed, but that was a mistake not POV pushing...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: This is a fanatical article with largescale POV about relations between India and a country that does not exist. Therefore...
Click to read more »November 2011 (UTC) Basically, it's POV pushing, so delete. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 17:07, 11 November 2011 (UTC) Delete - POV pushing. --Orashmatash 23:17,...
Click to read more »for the reason: Unsourced content about a nationalistic concept, possible POV pushing and violation of en:WP:SOAPBOX. Chenzw Talk 03:29, 2 January 2016...
Click to read more »be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Sheer POV pushing. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC) The Indian state...
Click to read more »IP to push POV. This is a blatant hoax there is no such thing as "Maratha Rashtra Parishad". The user has created many similar disruptive/POV pushing pages...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article is a short POV essay and does not even describe what the alleged topic is. Kansan (talk)...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Original research with a strong POV by a blocked user. This is just generalizations and completely unsupported...
Click to read more »hurry. StevenJ81 (talk) 22:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC) Delete as unsourced POV, OR and synthesis. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC) Delete-political...
Click to read more »independent source. Contents are POV laden to the point I don't think a merge of the contents is warranted for both POV and UNDUE reasons. Ravensfire (talk)...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - Especially the "major" sounds POV-ish. What is a major city? Is there a clear definition for it? Then keep...
Click to read more »request Mr.Hanes has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Heavy POV pushing, it neither cites neutral sources nor neutral views, the entire conclusion...
Click to read more »articles, because high-quality sources do not support the non-neutral POV, requiring the "POV pusher" to use substandard sourcing in an attempt to meet Wikipedia's...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems like an attempt to POV push PieWriter (talk) 07:03, 20 February 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »Cometan, seem to have been written by the creator himself, so there may be POV and OR issues. Auntof6 (talk) 23:02, 2 June 2019 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: This whole page is just a whole bunch of unreferenced POV with no useful information. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus is that article is too full of POV to be saved. No prejudice against recreation as a neutral article. -DJSasso...
Click to read more »article. The article suffers from a multiple of concerns including synthesis, POV pushing, and potential AI generation. CountryANDWestern (talk) 20:53, 12...
Click to read more »Krett12 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not neutral POV, is an attack at the paradox, constantly contains the word "I" Krett12 (talk)...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - this is a POV essay, there's no chance of an article sticking with this name. I'm tempted...
Click to read more »The article was originally tagged for QD by ONaNcle, as it has a strong POV and much of it needs proving. However, it doesn't fulfil QD criteria, so...
Click to read more »least about Wikipedia? I would have to say the people who spoil it: vandals, POV pushers, and anti-social people. Good heavens yes. Is there one thing in...
Click to read more »editor. Example: An editor asks an admin to warn another editor for alleged POV-pushing, and hints that the first editor's pending GAN or FAC review of the...
Click to read more »PiRSquared17 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: It's a POV stub. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't...
Click to read more »releases from one side, and the IP range with a strong POV doing this over and over and this is just a POV push that quite honestly this Wikipedia site cannot...
Click to read more »previous discussions. Ips or editors creating the article again are likely pov pushing, and should be blocked..--Eptalon (talk) 16:06, 20 June 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »to evangelize people or push my views; and if a Christian user pushed his POV about Christianity, and this sparked arguments and disruption, I would block...
Click to read more »sock, who was also using socks to support his case. The article was heavily POV without reliable sources and deleted on Enwiki for the same reasons. --Peterdownunder...
Click to read more »verify the history section and its notability, also including unsourced POV pushing. MathXplore (talk) 05:18, 19 July 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »- if not the actual words in the box, the actual name of the box. Clear POV pushing, not conducive for a collaborative environment. Thought about this...
Click to read more »merging. Delete. Yes, this is one of several pages which are full of OR, POV, lacking proper sources, unwikified, blog-like and maybe copy-pastes. I don't...
Click to read more »article with largescale POV about relations between India and a country that does not exist. It is unreferenced and based of original (POV) research. Therefore...
Click to read more »request Mr.Hanes has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Heavy POV pushing, it neither cites neutral sources nor neutral views, the entire conclusion...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete as OR and POV. Very strange page. Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »to establish his notability beyond one event. The tone of this article is POV and will require a significant rewrite if kept. CountryANDWestern (talk)...
Click to read more »expressed through reliable sources. The tone of this article is extremely POV and unencyclopedic. Would need a significant rewrite if kept. CountryANDWestern...
Click to read more »Unclear if this battle is notable enough to warrant a page. Potentially POV pushing. See discussion from earlier this year at en:Wikipedia:Articles for...
Click to read more »redirects, disambiguation pages, talk pages, documentation and special pages. POV Literally, a point of view, but often used negatively as an adjective to...
Click to read more »speedied Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 06:46, 7 April 2011 (UTC) Delete - it has serious POV issues. --Peterdownunder (talk) 12:15, 7 April 2011 (UTC) Delete - Seems...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - totally non notable and POV issues also. IWI (chat) 21:59, 3 June 2020 (UTC) Delete First few results...
Click to read more »request Mr.Hanes has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems POV pushing with invented name also this article isn't cited properly use of...
Click to read more »we need to be very careful here: It is possible to write this based on a POV of a tehological/philiosophical standpoint, you'll likely end up citing philosophers...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Merge to Tabriz due to POV / socking around all of this, lack of solid sources for everything in article...
Click to read more »Vituzzu, with reason: "created by en:user:Brunodam, known for copyvios, pov-pushing and insering false informations, please check even sourced statements...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Between 1891 and 1893, a bloody conflict erupted, POV. BigKrow (talk) 22:32, 12 January 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »monitor for continued POV pushing. A primary example of this is user:Freddy (en:user BoxingWear) who had an extensive history of POV issues on boxing articles...
Click to read more »sources, none of the sources exclusively call it a "Pakistani victory" Heavy POV pushing, it neither cites neutral sources nor neutral views, the entire conclusion...
Click to read more »article further. Mythdon (talk • changes) 18:28, 23 August 2009 (UTC) The POV has been removed and the article simplified. It is, of course, much smaller...
Click to read more »close request Mr.Hanes has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: POV:PUSH and WP:SYNTH, barely any of the sources calls it an "Ahir kingdom",...
Click to read more »internet. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:15, 14 January 2017 (UTC) Delete. Yes, it's all OR/POV. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:43, 14 January 2017 (UTC) Delete. I agree, reads...
Click to read more »Resolved. Unblocked per review. He is advised to tread carefully; avoiding POV pushing. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 21:28, 21 March 2011 (UTC) Fellows, it...
Click to read more »community banned user who had a history of POV pushing editing, so I just figured that the change he made was POV pushing again. I've been dealing with the...
Click to read more »Fr33kman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to be a POV push, per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/...
Click to read more »November 2008 (UTC) I have just created a new system for POV's. {{POV-check}} (same as on ENWP). POV violations are put into Category:NPOV disputes, to be...
Click to read more »either promotional or it was written by some fan of the shoe in a non-neutral POV. Either way, the shoe doesn't seem to be notable. TCN7JM 13:02, 26 November...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. Not proven to be notable, POV with original research by an editor likely connected with that site, unsourced...
Click to read more »That article was deleted in February due to it being "pseudo-historical POV fork" and a few other reasons (see [1] ) . It reappeared in the 4th of May...
Click to read more »English Wikipedia this topic area and article has been subjected to long-term POV pushing by a sockmaster. That leads me to question the motivations of the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia either. It is most likely a hoax, besides being poorly written from a POV. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't...
Click to read more »nation National saint of India Father of the Pakistani nation Nationalistic POV redirects equivalent to Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Hindustani...
Click to read more »English Wikipedia for edit-warring/POV-pushing on the same page (see here, here and here). For an idea into the different POVs being pushed here, compare the...
Click to read more »try to keep this post short, but here are a couple examples: widespread POV-pushing, demonstrated here and here, which has led to disruption such as...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:54, 2 August 2022 (UTC) Delete. All are unjustified nationalistic POV links, and not a proper use of the redirect facility. Macdonald-ross (talk)...
Click to read more »Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability, POV. This is a dubious genus based on a single tooth that cannot be verified...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete. Almost everything about this article is bad. Heavy POV, violation of several aspects of Biog of living persons requirements, lacks...
Click to read more »the creator does appear to be blocked as a sockpuppet on enwp, where caste POV-pushing does appear to be an issue. The SPI is at w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet...
Click to read more »subtle POV article.--Peterdownunder (talk) 01:27, 17 June 2012 (UTC) Delete - as per nom and others. It's unsourced, unwikified, not notable and POV. If...
Click to read more »such as merging. Keep - While it is obviously written in an anti-Ukrainian POV (...illegal Kiev junta regime), I don't think that deletion is the way to...
Click to read more »written in Simple English. Lots of disputes over content. Appears to be a POV fork of an EN-Wiki page or pages. Blissyu2 (talk) 11:27, 8 April 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »POV spiel. Using WP for propaganda, no attempt to write a proper article. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:52, 22 September 2019 (UTC) I understand the POV bit...
Click to read more »merging. Neutral - While I can see that the article is trying to push a POV here, is it not possible to rewrite it? — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 07:52...
Click to read more »close request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:POV, WP:PUFFERY, Notability. More a hagiography than a biography. Rus793 (talk)...
Click to read more »and the rest. The article is mildly POV. I think the section on Criticism is written in too dismissive a way; the POV of that section is that the criticism...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The content seems to be POV-ish, and unnotable. Furthermore, I sadly cannot find any such article on...
Click to read more »person. Kolya75Media (talk) 16:34, 10 October 2024 (UTC) Keep While the POV of the article is not ideal, I don't believe this is AI-generated. He has...
Click to read more »belief and is not significant. The writer of this page has created many POV articles and this is one of those IMO.--BRP ever 11:40, 13 January 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »choosing this particular topic as the theme for the list could come across as POV. Kansan (talk) 01:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC) Strong delete We're "not a newspaper...
Click to read more »can not use out own POV to make things smaller especially things like and others thought to be significant. That is very much POV editing. Either the...
Click to read more »an IP 212.108.146.62 is constantly POV pushing? I suspect that 212.108.146.62 is the same IP 185.135.96.2 who is POV pushing in the same pattern in the...
Click to read more »violation is the whole thing (implicitly, not that I actually disagree with the POV). What's wrong is "only one person to vote for, and that's Kim Jong Un"....
Click to read more »and introduce POV. Chenzw Talk 11:05, 27 June 2008 (UTC) Rephrase to do what? And as I've said, if the article becomes distorted and POV before it's promoted...
Click to read more »hard Delete that is what i am leaning toward. It is not encyclopedic; the POV starts with "... can be predicted with a comfortable level of accuracy"....
Click to read more »rather than proper nouns. Their meaning also sounds to be nationalistic POV. MathXplore (talk) 01:24, 26 August 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »(talk) 09:52, 28 June 2012 (UTC) Delete Not really needed; created by known POV pusher who has already started adding copyrighted content to it... Pmlineditor...
Click to read more »subject, content is unreferenced as to pov. Blockinblox 14:43, 13 October 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom; unverified and pov. --TBCΦtalk? 00:58, 14 October 2006...
Click to read more »EhJJ (talk) has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Largely POV and is not at all in simple English. Would need to be fundamentally rewritten...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete all per nom. Typical military engagement, POV pushing spam. CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:23, 23 September 2025 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »user repeats the same thing over and over again. However if the user does a POV-push which they have no history of and were continously moving pages with...
Click to read more »merging. Delete. This is another obvious self-advertisement. It violates WP:POV as well as the need for reliable sources of notability. Macdonald-ross (talk)...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: It may meet notability, but it seems written from a POV. There is no Wikidata entry. I cannot find it mentioned on enwp either. I...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A list which contains only POV, because there are only hobbies mentioned without any reference and the list...
Click to read more »version of the article cannot be used anyway because it is LLM generated and POV so that is moot. Polygnotus (talk) 21:29, 15 July 2025 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »Christian POV it doesn't matter both are just as bad as the other. But from a non-Christian POV your right...But I'll stick with a Christian POV.-- † ChristianMan16 ...
Click to read more »endless digs at the fact that we shouldn't use IRC borders on the point of 'POV pushing'. If Djsasso was running for adminship, I would oppose, let alone...
Click to read more »Many of you know we've had a user who edits via IPs and makes, typically, POV edits about Pakistan (and surrounding nations). In particular, articles in...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Bad spelling, not notable, not nPOV, very short, and not even one source Krett12 (talk) 16:13, 25 November 2015...
Click to read more »believe in quickly removing anything that can be seen to have lack a neutral POV and/or makes critical and unsubstantiated claims about anyone. I am happy...
Click to read more »having a POV is one thing, but he hasn't gone to the next step, which is edit warring over the POV. It is when they start to edit war over the POV is when...
Click to read more »article certainly is notable, but it is advertising. If changed to a good POV and worked on, I say Keep, but if not, then Delete, but not because of its...
Click to read more »defraud someone. --Eptalon (talk) 09:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC) Delete as POV, OR, unsourced, unencyclopedic spiel. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:52, 9 January...
Click to read more »Fylbecatulous talk 17:46, 19 May 2015 (UTC) Delete: Blog-like spiel, OR and POV, wrong on many points. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:27, 21 May 2015 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »school actually non-notable? It seems like it might be fixable by removing POV language. What I'm not sure of is if that's worth the effort. StevenJ81 (talk)...
Click to read more »contributor, but he has never created any account to my knowledge; he creates POV articles, full of red links to non-notable topics, and worst of all, he's...
Click to read more »I've recently blocked (for two weeks) two IPs used by the Pakistan POV editor for POV pushes. I don't know what is happening regarding the anon editing...
Click to read more »them, and no sign of POV activity. Not everyone who writes about Pakistan will be a POV pusher, but in view of the history of POV and Pakistan, it is probably...
Click to read more »logs · delete) Exert has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: POV/Personal essay Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that...
Click to read more »discussion of this a few months back; it ended clouded by accusations of POV pushing and trolling. However, it is clear that naming conventions, here...
Click to read more »charged/convicted with a hate crime in any of them. There are definitely POV issues with a category worded like this. For example compare this category...
Click to read more »The first two are clearly spam of a website and the third one is cleary POV (both also called vandalism). I agree with the rollback use there. --Barras...
Click to read more »Issue now is POV and content. Union Councils of Mardan District Category purged, each article has at least 1 IW link. Issue now is POV and content. Union...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Created by the Pakistan anon/POV pusher, this category is not neutral because it is a term created by the...
Click to read more »with POV and censorship, as shown in the religious category debate and the RfD on soggy biscuit. An administrator with an open expression of POV is an...
Click to read more »of Hinduism. The page already has lots of uncited stuff, and some rather POV statements; and some of it is difficult to simplify. I am doing my best,...
Click to read more »some consideration. The article is pushing a Turko-centric and unscientific POV. I have no objections if the article is recreated with NPOV and scientific...
Click to read more »editing and POV changes on political pages are part of what he was doing on En wiki. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC) Political POV editing...
Click to read more »(talk)⁄(changes) 19:18, 19 September 2010 (UTC) Delete as a personal essay promoting a POV (the US being a Christian nation), based substantively off of one source...
Click to read more »with most of what Macdonald-ross has proposed because it would be far to POV in a lot of cases to say you can't split this but you can split this. In...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Seems to have calmed down a bit, but Razorflame just undid a POV push in Kashmir fr33kman t - c 14:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC) I am slowly...
Click to read more »06:55, 29 May 2016 (UTC) Delete. The term is not encyclopedic, neologism and POV. There is no objection to the concept of temporary marriage, although they...
Click to read more »talk 19:59, 6 December 2015 (UTC) Keep as above. I would note my personal POV on this kind of article: Seasons of 0 or 1 loss, or 0 or 1 win, are notable...
Click to read more »From the looks of the block review, it appears mostly his issue was with POV in projectspace. Article space is our gold here. I would propose that we...
Click to read more »16:07, 3 July 2015 (UTC) Delete as unproven notabiity. Large parts look like POV invention or synthesis. Look at the date 1921: Iraq not a state, but a UK-administered...
Click to read more »could be fixed, although the article would need a fundamental rewrite for POV. Most of the information is not significant enough for an article. As far...
Click to read more »aspect of the article is its thoroughgoing POV, which is absolutely unrestrained. As others have commented, its POV will never be accepted by any wiki. So...
Click to read more »recreation by another editor The issue here isn't notability, but accuracy and POV. FYI, the closing admin can count this as an expression of a deletionist...
Click to read more »lack of credits is critical, and notability is not a defence because it is POV and probably a coyvio. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:37, 4 April 2021 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »searching) which is a major red flag for any caste article that it's really a POV fork of something. Ravensfire (talk) 17:26, 19 October 2023 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »such issues without a POV. I heard something like "we don't want lots of pages each with a few lines about sex toys". That's a POV. It could also be said...
Click to read more »allow an article about this. (Unless the article seemed to plagiarism or POV-pushing, which this doesn't seem to be.) Oholiba (talk) 20:08, 21 November...
Click to read more »dramas. It do will help readers I admit. Sorry for misunderstanding your POV. @SHB2000 Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:34, 8 October 2021 (UTC) Yeah no worries...
Click to read more »However, such blanking is done, often, and sometimes justified as removing "POV" (slanted point-of-view) text from the article, while effectively axing entire...
Click to read more »current state. Osiris (talk) 05:16, 15 February 2014 (UTC) Delete. Wildly POV, unwikified, personal involvement, no evidence of notability, no reliable...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:OR and non-neutral POV Gotanda (talk) 05:37, 28 March 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »11 June 2010 (UTC) Keep He has had a few pages deleted before due to some POV pushing. Surely we shouldn't be picking on editor's pages to be deleted,...
Click to read more »--Auntof6 (talk) 18:52, 12 April 2014 (UTC) Is that by any chance the Pakistani POV pusher - some person creating lots of stuff related to India, Pakistan and...
Click to read more »--§ Snake311 (T + C) RFA 04:46, 29 September 2007 (UTC) Delete unsourced, POV, not in simple english. Oysterguitarist 14:19, 29 September 2007 (UTC) Delete'...
Click to read more »00:24, 3 Jul 2005 (UTC) deleteDejvid 7 July 2005 19:17 (UTC) Justice another POV rant. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 16:29, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) Delete if not simplified...
Click to read more »IMDB mentions it. It's Hungarian, so from US POV perhaps not relevant or prominent, but from Eastern Europe POV pretty relevant. How many Hu animations do...
Click to read more »is a POV word. Generally we try to avoid either descriptor if possible because either can be an issue, but of the two disputed is the least POV. But people...
Click to read more »Ionas68224. Took a look on Commons and he's caused trouble for pushing his POV - which I imagine would be quite challenging on a media library. I found...
Click to read more »aren't POV cats either. 🪐 Haumeon the Adventurer 🪐 18:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC) That is simply untrue (Pakistan is a neologism) and the cats are POV/OR...
Click to read more »knows this person and therefore this article is not written from a neutral POV. I have also done some research about Aisaki Media, a business owned by the...
Click to read more »wiki and in violation for vandalism, incivility, canvassing, harassment, POV, edit warring, disruption, stalking and personal attack against me. Yesterday...
Click to read more »keeping it.--I did not catch if the article says that "killer app" is a POV concept. The article does not seem to explain if being a "killer app" is...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete is what i am leaning toward. POV article? Maybe.--En-wiki's article links to no wiki-articles (on their project)...
Click to read more »change on this one. -Orashmatash- 23:16, 9 December 2011 (UTC) An example of POV problems is the inclusion of a link to the YouTube video. If you want to...
Click to read more »the change and forces their PoV on the world. I'm not choosing the PoV of the political elite, I'm shying away from the PoV of the media elite. As to every...
Click to read more »acquainted with Simple to join and best of all (4) it'll be fun :-) (my PoV) So what do you guys think? If you are interested in helping just say which...
Click to read more »BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Another clan POV page. I say we purge them all as most are full of promotion, misinformation...
Click to read more »articles. Wikipedia has almost no way to stop groups of people who are all POV-pushing some viewpoint. Even on the English Wikipedia, formal en:WP:Requests...
Click to read more »There are three main issues I'm watching with this editor; 1) socks, 2) POV posts, 3) copyright vios. fr33kman talk 01:40, 10 March 2009 (UTC) I would...
Click to read more »landing conspiracy theories. There were concerns that the first title was POV. I agree. However, in my attempt to find an NPOV title, I have created a...
Click to read more »changes, as my view is they are POV and need reverting.--Peterdownunder (talk) 04:05, 5 October 2011 (UTC) Yup, it's the same POV edit as the past being restored...
Click to read more »rather than browsing through the "knowledge groups" (but this is just my pov). If it's necessary to keep them, I agree with Sonia it would be nice to...
Click to read more »was a "brutal dictator", it may well be true but it still seems a little 'pov' way of putting it, and the guy is still alive! Maybe better to say he is...
Click to read more »Especially since deciding what or what doesn't belong would come down to POV. -Djsasso (talk) 15:40, 28 April 2009 (UTC) (change conflict) Would the...
Click to read more »own articles and reject changes from others, we would soon see a lot of POV-pushing and that would be detrimental to the project generally. As for RyanCross's...
Click to read more »--Cromwellt|talk 21:14, 7 March 2006 (UTC) I think BCE and CE are even more pov terms, because they assume that dating years from Christ is or should be...
Click to read more »propose the page in question for deletion. The placing of 'complex' and 'POV' tags on pages solves no problems. Pages that look to be in real trouble...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:30, 22 May 2019 (UTC) To be honest that would likely end up in POV territory if we lumped them all together as in professions where women are...
Click to read more »without a POV." QUESTION: What is the so-called 'threat'? QUESTION: What makes this urgent? QUESTION: Where is this blackout covered without a POV? 4 Racepacket's...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:22, 13 September 2012 (UTC) At a quick glance I don't believe it is POV at all. Throughout the article it says "Christians believe...", "Protestants...
Click to read more »do it for all because not doing it for every subject is either a biased POV approach to specific topics at best or a complete violation of NOTCENSORED...
Click to read more »greatly appreciated as this seems to be strongly biased from a Pakistani POV on the subject (mainly the Indian controlled section of the region). Articles...
Click to read more »are supposed to weigh up the things that will help the wiki and avoid WP:POV. ~ R.T.G 06:34, 24 October 2008 (UTC) The community decided a long time ago...
Click to read more »sources. Until then we have a useless article that exists for the sake of POV pushing. MrMeAndMrMeTalk 07:16, 8 June 2026 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »2024 (UTC) Delete I'm looking at this category from a slightly different POV so don't mind the outcome either way, whichever the closing admin sees as...
Click to read more »same range, has been adding POV edits to the article over the last day. This article has had issues in the past for POV pushing and it seems that this...
Click to read more »additional opinions in that discussion, POV pushing there is to be expected. RfD is all about each persons POV coming together to form a general consensus...
Click to read more »material to Islam, but anything I write on the topic will probably need to be POV-checked. sonia♫ 22:39, 11 August 2010 (UTC) Mosque has never been a GA candidate...
Click to read more »remove an award because an editor does not believe she deserved it is blatant POV. It would be akin to refusing to accept that Halle Berry got a Razzie award...
Click to read more »the governments of Belgrade and Serbia a few hours later. I suspect it is POV as it was reverted before but am not sure. 97.103.130.129 (talk) 14:38, 4...
Click to read more »November 2008 (UTC) I would appreciate extra sets of eyes at DYK. There is POV pushing about what is suitable for the main page. Moreover the article selected...
Click to read more »Personally, I don't see where essays belong in Wikipedia because they are kind of POV, and can be construed in very weird and/or derogatory ways. That is probably...
Click to read more »June 2010 (UTC) Any about a city I wouldn't be speedying....that would be POV...because cities are notable. -DJSasso (talk) 19:56, 9 June 2010 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »livejournal.com in Ukraine and I do not know if they are even valid and not a POV or anything. PotsdamLamb (talk) 17:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC) @PotsdamLamb...
Click to read more »editor is actually one of the reasons we want it. He creates really bad POV articles that we keep having to delete and he refuses to communicate with...
Click to read more »claiming Asian-centric). Names should be eliminated as they have a local POV issue (Municipality does not work in some European and many Asian countries...
Click to read more »21:52, 28 May 2025 (UTC) Yeah, I've been having problems moderating between POV pushers with regards to castes. Personally I'd like to see them all nuked...
Click to read more »to cause distress. Kennedy 09:23, 13 March 2009 (UTC) Yeah it really is a POV thing. I'd probably get rid of it myself. That being said I haven't really...
Click to read more »Please don't feign lack of knowledge. You're blatantly pushing your own POV here, and edit warring to boot. Majorly talk 22:26, 11 December 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »close request Only has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: POV article that relies almost solely on primary publications related solely...
Click to read more »is making good or bad changes. Some changes are good and many others are POV pushy. Recently S3CR3T found herself in a pickle regarding this user and...
Click to read more »beyond my level of comprehension. If they were banned for creating copyvios, POV pushing or something related to disruption to articles, then by all means...
Click to read more »that all tags should go on talk pages, except ones that note content is POV. hmwithτ 16:44, 25 August 2009 (UTC) I'd be fine with this. –Juliancolton | Talk...
Click to read more »and deleting everything except the VGA/GA etc. Otherwise its a complete POV situation. One line stubs as Gordonrox mentions that have room to grow are...
Click to read more »more long and in simple english than 10 one line stubs. But that is just my pov. -Djsasso (talk) 13:36, 14 January 2009 (UTC) Well obviously you don't like...
Click to read more »not start off with one indef block, but with multiple blocks concerning POV pushing, edit warring, civility issues, escalating all the way up to indef...
Click to read more »to go through all, but either they aren't totally reliable (having some POV issues, fringe issues), or not independent (like having some close relationship...
Click to read more »Eyes.2005 and the allegation of POV-pushing by Gotitbro (...a very serious accusation imo...); This has been cited as my POV push, where I simply aligned...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: This article is poorly written, and seems to have some POV issues. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't...
Click to read more »09:25, 10 March 2017 (UTC) Personally, I don't think he should be. But my POV on such things is well known. However, I have a bigger concern... StevenJ81...
Click to read more »Examples? fr33kman talk 04:45, 11 October 2009 (UTC) (It's probably just my POV):1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Bot flag request for higher editcounties, 6. All imo unuseful...
Click to read more »material which can be added without modification to WP and are discouraged as POV, but does anyone want to incorporate some of the information into the article...
Click to read more »We have little influence on who edits, and except for blatant vandalism/POV_pushing there is little we can do. If you re-sized EnWP to our editor base...
Click to read more »original template used by a bot to generate the stub articles, included a very POV-ish stand alone statement: "Before 1945 the area was part of Germany." (example:...
Click to read more »person is very defining of them in just about every profession. It is highly POV not to categorize as such. It is very likely that someone would search for...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Appears ai generated, overly complicated and possibly POV. However topic also appears to clearly have a decent amount of support as...
Click to read more »Uanfala (talk) 04:15, 10 February 2019 (UTC) I think its part of the Pakistan POV Pusher we have had before. Just blocked, and removed their content. -- Enfcer...
Click to read more »as is. Notable individuals are notable, pairing down is silly and frankly POV. Red links are not bad. -DJSasso (talk) 02:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC) Some...
Click to read more »believe admins have waited and communicated enough for the creator. In my POV, I do not see reasons to keep so many sandboxes. Although, the creator may...
Click to read more »The article was originally tagged for QD by ONaNcle, as it has a strong POV and much of it needs proving. However, it doesn't fulfil QD criteria, so...
Click to read more »from his IP. In addition to his personal attacks, Jonas also seems to have POV issues at times. This, for example, is considered a "more neutral" heading...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:05, 9 May 2016 (UTC) IP user 66:37:226:66 has been introducing POV or vandalism edits to Sudan (among others) since the beginning of April....
Click to read more »a few weeks or months. Perhaps the most that can be done is to lodge a "POV dispute" on an article's talk-page, but not carry out a protracted debate...
Click to read more »QD Reasons: Vituzzu Said "contents by three sockpuppets of the same LTA/pov pusher/hoaxster, brunodam -- Enfcer (talk) 18:09, 13 February 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »simplification, incomplete or missing references and most troubling, subtle POV changes in some. For example, the most recent account, LittleTrumpJackStar...
Click to read more »system of units of measurement", he reverted. (See System of units) Blatant POV in his opposition to metrication Centaur has taken every opportunity to run...
Click to read more »company's founder. Those edits do not appear to have introduced a significant POV (or NPOV) issue, but are of concern anyway. Finally, I checked other Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Kind regards, ToQ100gou2 (talk) 08:35, 14 February 2015 (UTC) The Pakistani POV-pusher may be back. Several new stubs on the New Pages list. User:Rus793...
Click to read more »due to the nature of the vandalism (at the bare minimum, this is extreme POV pushing) and its likeliness to repeat. -- Creol(talk) 13:01, 23 August 2008...
Click to read more »caused because of how much people use IRC on this wiki. But thats just my POV. Nothing on IRC should ever be taken seriously. -Djsasso (talk) 18:54, 28...
Click to read more »extent) in Mossad article when I suggested a merge. We do allow different POV to be documented in Wikipedia, just that it must be neutral in the end. There...
Click to read more »Created on German wiki by the same editor here who has been pushing OR and POV on other articles. Gotanda (talk) 21:36, 22 December 2022 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »2012 (UTC) I ♥ GoblinBots! Please semi-protect Tamara Toumanova. Ongoing IP POV pushing. Janitor Joe (talk) 13:22, 4 January 2012 (UTC) Done by Chenzw here...
Click to read more »range has included only one semi-valid edit (which was later removed due to POV). If this group continues to present a problem with open proxies, a wider...
Click to read more »Josip Broz Tito under a semi protection? IPs have returned to push their POV into the article, giving undue weight against the subject. This has been...
Click to read more »explained Ref 4 no mention of dasikane or orthodoxy The editor is pushing a POV with multiple similar entries. Please delete all of the inbound redirects...
Click to read more »about diplomatic (and non-diplomatic) relations can easily be used to spread POV material (e.g. making a specific country "better" in the point of view)....
Click to read more »–Juliancolton | Talk 19:12, 25 July 2009 (UTC) The editor is disruptive because they have a POV... that the articles does not belong due to it's creator. The editor is not...
Click to read more »that was blocked for pushing Rajput caste POV, but restoring their edits, you also tried to push caste POV, but not for the first time. Everything I've...
Click to read more »behaviour in what appears to be a clear attempt to push their POV on our wiki. Examples of POV pushing in an undue fashion: here and here they made half of...
Click to read more »protected for a week due to these changes. I feel like there's some sort of POV pushing going on here, as there's no reason to make over half of the article...
Click to read more »it with a few problem editors such as the disney vandal and the pakistani pov pusher. -DJSasso (talk) 12:00, 27 June 2019 (UTC) Delete - Also agree with...
Click to read more »06:02, 12 July 2010 (UTC) Today, an IP address was blocked after blatant POV pushing on Pakistan-related articles for abusing multiple IP addresses. http://simple...
Click to read more »Delete. As the biog contains wrong information as well as synthesised and POV material, it is best to get rid of it. Deletion does not prevent another...
Click to read more »sides are not POV pushing. It is mostly @Kojak Savalas, as @Super Dromaeosaurus is not removing sourced content in favor of a nationalistic POV, as far as...
Click to read more »really relevant. The additional text feels like an attempt at introducing POV material into the various articles, but I'm not familiar enough with the...
Click to read more »another device) and then defend the same pov, He is First was Topic ban on en.wiki just because of his POV behavior towards Rajput specially adding "Yaduvanshi...
Click to read more »June 2025 (UTC) For some time now I have been acting as mediator on various POV edit wars going on to the Caste based pages. As such I have now made it a...
Click to read more »should not let any DYKs or articles be featured as they are all promoting a POV by your argument. It's only for five days, it's not forever and not the end...
Click to read more »it's off-wiki. Canvassing the stewards will just be annoying from their POV. –Orashmatash 18:59, 28 October 2011 (UTC) Um, above I just asked Barras...
Click to read more »source, he had tried to remove the entire section, just to push his own POV. ([2]). Request the admins to restore the sections and take necessary actions...
Click to read more »time.--12.144.5.2 (talk) 07:52, 19 March 2020 (UTC) Blocked for the same pov issues as on en.wiki. -DJSasso (talk) 15:14, 19 March 2020 (UTC) Thanks,...
Click to read more »was not a lot of info, I could easily argue there was no real one sided POV push that often defines advert articles. But anyway, an admin felt it was...
Click to read more »A. B. (talk) 17:40, 20 August 2007 (UTC) Strong delete, pure attempt at POV-pushing, brought here to circumvent its deletion at EnWP. Might even support...
Click to read more »people, en:Bodo culture), and at least the first even seems to have a neutral POV. But this is so far from my experience that I, like Mac, could not possibly...
Click to read more »similar pattern during my initial research. Other than ref bombing with POV references, have any of you noticed other violations of editing policies...
Click to read more »believe in quickly removing anything that can be seen to have lack a neutral POV and/or makes critical and unsubstantiated claims about anyone. I am happy...
Click to read more »been unanswered so far. The reverting reintroduces lots of low quality and POV sentences and weasel words into the article. As there are practically nill...
Click to read more »19:53, 30 April 2009 (UTC) I never said we were writing it from a Christian POV, and don't think we should. Try actually reading what I wrote and then maybe...
Click to read more »should probably get rid of the article. The big question (from a popularity POV) is whether these animals are similar to yetis (for which we also have an...
Click to read more »15 March 2026 (UTC) Bljr, just to be clear, I am not associated with any POV on this whatsoever. This period of time should definitely be covered, I am...
Click to read more »does seem to point to a disruptive editor pushing a personal objective and PoV. --Creol(talk) 17:08, 20 March 2013 (UTC) Editor blocked, not going to range...
Click to read more »22:35, 27 December 2007 (UTC) Delete per Nickm57. At best this page is a POV nightmare, most likely it is a theory by a few nationalistic historians about...
Click to read more »"minority appeasement" + india, and then use the results that come back. POV issues are all over the place. "Shah Bano was unfairly divorced by her husband"...
Click to read more »This article, for its size has way too little references, and has numerous POV problems, for example: "People should choose an instrument that they enjoy...
Click to read more »These have been a problem for a while and some have been the subject of POV pushing and edit wars. fr33kman 22:05, 2 June 2025 (UTC) Keep: That such...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:37, 28 March 2009 (UTC) Oh don't get me started on the political POV on Wikiepdia, I try stay out of that cause I'll go off like a bomb. If would...
Click to read more »to enforce the point that you arn't just using the page to show your own POV and that others actually share it. Gwib-(talk)- 15:35, 18 September 2007...
Click to read more »Delete - A long time ago, the community decided that all articles by the POV-pushing vandal should be deleted and the user blocked on sight. Perhaps it...
Click to read more »encyclopedic.--Is there a major problem with tone and/or promotional feel and/or POV? Not sure, but something feels 'quite off'.--If my view is regarded as helpful...
Click to read more »many libraries" is not a universal hallmark of notability, It is also a POV claim, and it can mean one book in three libraries in all of China, and it...
Click to read more »this here in the RfD - This was part of a mass cleanup of Hoax/attempted POV cleanup back in 2017 and it looks like nothing changed to be included into...
Click to read more »log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Reason: Both have recently pushed the same POV on Christianity. Shapiros10 22:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Unlikely. Majorly...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Repeated POV pushing towards RKO (whatever that is) on Disney related articles suggests...
Click to read more »written in such a way that implies something non-existent ‒ also a significant POV issue The article is unencyclopedic and fundamentally flawed, serving no...
Click to read more »usual Rajput caste POV push around this topic. I would encourage others to look at the versions on en wiki for some idea of the POV pushing from this temp...
Click to read more »it self cause it would cause an uproar. This nomination is in favor of a POV.-- † CM16 19:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC) Further there are several hundred...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC) Neither of the following points are POV. POV is "Point of View" and indicates that the writer is stating their own opinion...
Click to read more »you give? User:TDKR is indefinitely blocked on the English Wikipedia for POV pushing on Ukrainian related articles. They make several constructive edits...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC) Delete Article written in POV tone, more than a few sources are press-releases / sponsored news articles...
Click to read more »asked for disputes is that at times, they can be quite insistent on their POV and it might cause issues, but overall I see is an editor who is willing...
Click to read more »Ravensfire (talk) 00:44, 27 November 2025 (UTC) P.S. Fixing what he alleges to be POV issues does not justify him breaking every rule on the website, including...
Click to read more »to restrict the article right down to admins because it kept getting very POV stuff added to it. -DJSasso (talk) 18:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC) Comment: I...
Click to read more »fairly precise idea on dealing vandalism, license errors etc. as set out. POV, reference details, etc. are flexible stuff but straight vandalising and...
Click to read more »'second coming of Etymology of Junagadh'; That last article was maybe 'quite POV and quite not to the point, in regard to the title'.--I will try to see how...
Click to read more »information that matters in the end - CoI is a warning that we may be dealing with Pov issues not that something needs to go and this is a single CoI, not every/majority...
Click to read more »which looks is an evangelical press. I would question the neutrality of the POV here. Double checking with the new spelling, I still find no mention of rejecters...
Click to read more »the article, I notice that there are numerous unsourced facts, including POV such as "Many societies see this as very bad." The prose is also confusing...
Click to read more »keeping the article at the current title. Steven Slater air rage incident has POV concerns, violates WP:BLP, and has no reliable sources that deem the incident...
Click to read more »those, two are not formatted properly. There are also instances of unsourced POV, such as "Midwesterners are sometimes viewed as open, friendly, and straightforward...
Click to read more »have a policy or concensus to support this being notable, it is just your POV and had no bearing. --Creol(talk) 20:19, 7 May 2022 (UTC) As the article...
Click to read more »seen a lot of the user's POV pushing and I believe that castecruft is there too, Singh Jadon have gotten a bit too far on the POV pushing, and it needs to...
Click to read more »'Hindustan' and 'Hindustani' have been used frequently, which may constitute WP:POV since 'Hindustan' refers only to the modern state of India today. – Cyber...
Click to read more »"does not look as nice"? Needs reference, otherwise this is pure WP:OR/WP:POV. The "In biology" section needs several more references. Overall, perhaps...
Click to read more »relegating some explanations to daughter article. With regard to POV, I see no POV tags, and I believe that any that are placed are in error Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈...
Click to read more »make me doubt whether they will / had used their tools to pursue a certain POV. However, since the filer said this isn't the case they are pursuing it's...
Click to read more »PR), who in turn has been blocked for a myriad of reasons including COI/POV pushing and cross-wiki sockpuppetry. I am not a member of the Simple Wikipedia...
Click to read more »community banned from English Wikipedia due to his history of socking and caste POV pushing, which seems to be repeating here. After his request for unblock...
Click to read more »Even though millions of people know about it? Hmmm..... what an interesting POV! ;) fr33kman 05:48, 19 March 2010 (UTC) Comment not sure if creators can...
Click to read more »consider asking first, and not in a way that stipulates your subjective POV about the policies and common practices right away. It will do me and probably...
Click to read more »advise you to avoid such personal attacks and instead of focusing on caste pov push edits better add constructive information on the articles that too along...
Click to read more »believe in quickly removing anything that can be seen to have lack a neutral POV and/or makes critical and unsubstantiated claims about anyone. I am happy...
Click to read more »sources, and the sources aren't verifiable, it also doesn't have a neutral POV tone, it feels much promotional. I would improve it if it wasn't for the...
Click to read more »Apparently you don't even have to be American to make the list.. It also has PoV/Who?/OR issues but that is not actionable here. Would suggest also deleting...
Click to read more »example of my anti-vandalism efforts, where I have dealt with caste-based POV pushers. Shakib ul hassan talk! 17:02, 6 February 2025 (UTC) I am seeing...
Click to read more »this POV and anachronistic disruption, enwiki users when the user's recent unblock appeal also did (after being blocked for socking); with blatant POV and...
Click to read more »article; all deletions of it were done in an incorrect manner and seem to be a POV push. I believe the article should be restored. fr33kman talk 20:04, 27 March...
Click to read more »07:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC) Needs doZens more refs. Many MOS breaches and some POV which need to be fixed. Also needs to be more prose and less bullet point...
Click to read more »sheep and cattle (to avoid huge sheep!) " and almost forgotten" sounds like POV. "In 1839, he moved.." he-> Stuart "European" and "relatives" are dab links...
Click to read more »to pretend she is notable so it makes people here feel better. A neutral POV does not support keeping the article. Pure Evil (talk) 23:43, 13 February...
Click to read more »Codedon (talk) 22:07, 21 June 2010 (UTC) I just removed some POV-ish things. I still reads a bit POV-ish. Haven't reviewed it for GA yet, just read it for the...
Click to read more »info (without sources) one IP adding Palestine POV the other adding Israeli POV instead of Neutral POV. Faraz Sualeh (talk) 04:51, 11 October 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »editing along with the 157.49.*.* IP range noted in the SPI to push their POV. The IP range has created deleted articles in en.wiki especially Annamalai...
Click to read more »contribs) without any review, comment, discussion, sources review, etc. POV. Please help. 118.201.150.4 (talk) 04:49, 24 December 2018 (UTC) You need...
Click to read more »created and immediately begin editing the same page Zen was editing. Similar POV pushing and patterns in speech. Would not be surprised if this is linked...
Click to read more »article is not far off good article. It just needs a few simplifys, a few POV removed (maybe?) and a couple of good external links. ~ R.T.G 23:57, 10 April...
Click to read more »and the IP is claiming "keeping Greek instead of Turkish is nationalist POV", The IP has also made previous Greek-to-Turkish replacements:[27], I'm assuming...
Click to read more »org/wiki/Standard_Model Standard Model] which has unfortunately a physics-POV name. We can and should fix this ...') 10:49, 18 Dec 2003 Angela deleted...
Click to read more »the 90s and not in the 80s. Its a reasonable size and well written, in my POV. Any fixes, I'll be gladly to correct. Thanks, Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 23:00...
Click to read more »| join TBA!) 21:10, 28 October 2025 (UTC) There’s been a good amount of POV pushing at Grokipedia already since its creation earlier today. It may require...
Click to read more »indo-pak conflict talk page like here:[7][8] Editing on the same page try the POV pushing here: IP user removed the analysis section of 2025 conflict page...
Click to read more »of the targets." needs a reference. In my opinion, the second example is POV without a reference. Some redlinks should become blue. Barras (talk) 11:47...
Click to read more »get logged out, that edit summary is questionable. And the allegations of POV, have me concerned, but as of right now that is about the only aspect, I...
Click to read more »possibly abused me by saying "tuadi mkc bro" [17]. I have reverted the caste POV-pushing edits and restored the article to a neutral version. I request semi-protection...
Click to read more »Rajput POV pusher ip. This ip is Rajput caste warrior and please check the edits by this ip. Here are list of pages raided by this Rajput POV pusher ip...
Click to read more »removed "famous mosques" - this is Simple English but we should still maintain POV standards. What makes one mosque more "famous" than another? Why "Mosques...
Click to read more »21 November 2024 (UTC) If the content is obviously malicious, incorrect, POV, OR, or publicly unverifiable information, it can be removed and then user...
Click to read more »2024 (UTC) The article is constantly vandalized by history revisioners and pov pushers. It was vandalized 6 times in the last two days, and it's always...
Click to read more »surname was Yaduvanshi and belongs to Jadaun Rajput and all So why this POV article exist, this was totally vandalized and should be deleted and there...
Click to read more »Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 15:06, 4 November 2024 (UTC) This article is a very bad WP:POV fork of en:November 2024 Amsterdam attacks (including the name). It contains...
Click to read more »intervention by the community is needed. I first assumed this was Rajput POV pushing on the part of MughalaiHistorian02, but the sources do support it...
Click to read more »these are POVs. Sometimes they are published but in local papers (say India, Afghanistan, even here in the US). At what point do we not allow a POV to come...
Click to read more »assistance with. Non-admin closures can result in unnecessary drama. And, from my POV: RfD almost never gets into a massive backlog and if it does, then it usually...
Click to read more »to this discussion. Hello all, There has been a lengthy discussion about POV-pushing, at the Admin noticeboard. The Users Kojak Savalas and Super Dromaeosaurus...
Click to read more »for a friend. 46.138.72.194 (talk) 07:31, 13 January 2024 (UTC) From my POV - is he, or is death notable enough to warrant an article? I have no idea...
Click to read more »January 2024 (UTC) Okay, thank you. I’ve seen a lot of articles contain a 2nd POV and I wanted to change them. TheWikiCyclone (talk) 01:58, 17 January 2024...
Click to read more »the governments of Belgrade and Serbia a few hours later. I suspect it is POV as it was reverted before but am not sure. 97.103.130.129 (talk) 14:38, 4...
Click to read more »--Another thing: The creation of some of things, seem to be POV; However, the establishment, is not POV.--Another thing: Things have to sound like okay English;...
Click to read more »log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Reason: Both have recently pushed the same POV on Christianity. Shapiros10 22:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Unlikely. Majorly...
Click to read more »Lights and freedom (talk) 00:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC) Not done - LTA POV pusher Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 16:39, 28 July...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 14:30, 31 December 2023 (UTC) They're a pov pushing sock in the (I guess "normal"?) Eng Wiki [19]. And to no surprise...
Click to read more »I have since reverted that removal, as the discussion is closed. From my POV, I did see the comment and the opposition it attracted while closing, but...
Click to read more »Going through it again, there are a lot of things that are unsourced and POV and not accurate at all. I compared this to en version and the page there...
Click to read more »NDG (talk) 06:17, 14 April 2026 (UTC) Some of the Sources available are N:POV maybe keep article and suggest for improvement! ~2026-23149-19 (talk) 14:33...
Click to read more »December 2024 (UTC) I just removed most of them as they were unrelated and pov-pushing as well. Why was Adolf Hitler a related page under autobiography...
Click to read more »Lights and freedom (talk) 02:13, 13 April 2023 (UTC) Thanks. Looks like a POV fork to me. Blissyu2 (talk) 00:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC) Hello everyone, The...
Click to read more »24 May 2025 (UTC) Attal (caste). (Attal). Sejwal (caste). (Sejwal).--Is POV-pushing, et cetera, going on?--If my question is viewed as a Good-faith question...
Click to read more »the items. In general, it would be good to have a better native speaker POV on the items — including their names in the Meitei script and possibly mergers/sitelinks...
Click to read more »Can you look a bit at the article Wet T-shirt contest, I think it is a bit pov biased (the sexism sentence) and it has an image which does not really explain...
Click to read more »(talk) 23:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC) The thing is that he was pushing a pov, like saying the holocaust uniqueness debate is holocaust denial or distortion...
Click to read more »mathematics, so I thought something could be taken from here. Of course, POV pushing opinions or original research must be eliminated. Again, I'm sorry...
Click to read more »and also Jadaun This User are removing reference from article and Doing PovPush as you can see in Thakur . Coelentrata (talk) 04:57, 20 September 2025...
Click to read more »been unanswered so far. The reverting reintroduces lots of low quality and POV sentences and weasel words into the article. As there are practically nill...
Click to read more »Foreign relation.--What if Country T changes its laws, so that goods (or products) from the U.S. , do not have to (customs-tax or) customs duty, when those...
Click to read more »