Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following one or more categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
share their own view, which is against the NPOV policy. So it is important to assume good faith. People who wrote the article and think they own it should...
Click to read more »giving careful attention to the answers. For example, try to re-think your own words in terms of the graphic pyramid at the right. Try to use the graphic...
Click to read more »list: A lot of other useful pages are linked from here. You can set your own preferences or choices for the Simple English Wikipedia software at Special:Preferences...
Click to read more »User talk pages are for talking with other members. Every user has their own. You do not have to sign up for Wikipedia and get a username to have a talk...
Click to read more »some text. Please remember that Wikipedia is not a forum, chat site or your own website! Do not add profanity, things that are not true, or things that attack...
Click to read more »advance a position. This means that Wikipedia is not the place to publish your own opinions, experiences, arguments, or conclusions. Citing sources and avoiding...
Click to read more »another website. The Simple English Wikipedia is a separate Wikipedia in its own right. Shortcuts WP:CENSORWP:CENSOR WP:DICTIONARYWP:DICTIONARY WP:NOTCRYSTALWP:NOTCRYSTAL...
Click to read more »written and published non-trivial works of their own about it. Otherwise, someone could give their own topic as much notability as they want by simply...
Click to read more »Special:Mypage and Special:Mytalk special pages will take each user to her or his own user and user talk pages. Others will not be able to find your user page...
Click to read more »Sometimes it may be needed to create accounts with a username that is like your own to prevent other editors from using it. Such accounts are called doppelgänger...
Click to read more »is written by just one person, it is often that person's opinion or their own point of view. This may not be completely correct. If a website is selling...
Click to read more »username as the first word: Also, you can make a template appear with your own writing. Just type {{wikibreak|message=(your message here)}}, and it will...
Click to read more »be distributed by a special group that is well-known for checking their own facts as well, making sure the information is correct or true. On the article...
Click to read more »higher levels of the page. User subpages – making extra pages within your own user namespace, for example, [[User:Example/Draft of article]] or [[User:Example/About...
Click to read more »admin will understand the complaint. Note: To be most successful at AN, your own history must be clean. At all times, stay civil, and avoid engaging in multiple...
Click to read more »English version of the GFDL. Important note: The Wikimedia Foundation does not own copyright on Wikipedia article texts and illustrations. It is therefore useless...
Click to read more »registered user or IP. When enabled, it will stop them from changing their own user talk page during the duration of their block. Bots may be blocked at...
Click to read more »created in a user's userspace. Anyone can create a WikiProject in their own namespace. Let's say you are user:Example and want to create a WikiProject...
Click to read more »make hundreds of changes and create lots of new articles. Wikipedia is owned by the Wikimedia Foundation. Note: Wikipedia has pages that some people...
Click to read more »{{unblock|1=Insert your reason to be unblocked here}}. Don't forget to insert your own reason. If you cannot change your talk page or the reason is private, email...
Click to read more »links were not added automatically. And each language had to maintain their own list of links. If you see these, you can safely remove them if Wikidata is...
Click to read more »because this can happen anywhere and at anytime, at school, or even in their own homes. Governments around the world are under increasing pressure to do something...
Click to read more »or other type of association. Several million people have created their own blogs in the last few years. Thus, one must assess whether the source is...
Click to read more »special club. Any new place where humans work together on something has its own special rules and ways of doing things which take time to learn, and which...
Click to read more »another website. Simple English Wikipedia is a separate Wikipedia in its own right. Note that the Simple English Wikipedia has a one-strike rule regarding...
Click to read more »a neutral, reliably sourced encyclopedia. Changing pages to promote your own interests or those of other people, companies, or groups, is a COI. Where...
Click to read more »fix it. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done...
Click to read more »allowed. Generally, a person with rollback may also use it to revert their own edits in mainspace as long as those edits are a mistake and also not likely...
Click to read more »as each section grows, there comes a time when each article must have its own page. "Equal" disambiguation: all articles are moved to distinct names, and...
Click to read more »key to every category tag on the page that does not have a sort key of its own. To use the Default sort, the line {{DEFAULTSORT:Sort key}} is used. Sort...
Click to read more »We may be wrong – Use at your own risk – We are not doctors – We can't help with law – You may disagree with what we include This page has our disclaimer...
Click to read more »make changes try to consider other ways of looking at things, not just your own opinion. Watch what you write. We are an encyclopedia, so articles must be...
Click to read more »very good articles (VGA) or good articles (GA) as they already get their own spotlight on the Main Page as the "Selected very good article" and “Selected...
Click to read more »certain parts of a policy, but ignoring other parts Viewing the policy in your own opinion, and not as it was supposed to be understood Making false consensus...
Click to read more »out first on the English Wikipedia and then we'll need to adapt it to our own project. For that reason, I have blanked Wikipedia talk:Copyrights so that...
Click to read more »RevisionDelete will appear in the usual deletion logs. They do not have their own logs and do not appear in a user's deleted contributions. If a page with...
Click to read more »children may actually be adults pretending to be children for reasons of their own. When a user says they are a child, especially if they provide personal information...
Click to read more »an IP address that would otherwise be blocked through no fault of their own. Temporary account IP viewer is a right given to trusted users that allows...
Click to read more »address until the block expires. That is why it is a good idea to get your own user name by signing up to Wikipedia. Another reason is that other editors...
Click to read more »section headers; they should not be in an ==Introduction== section of their own. If there are at least four headers, the table of contents will automatically...
Click to read more »its own spin-off newsletter. Over at Simple.Wikiquote, you can find a similar news page. While I don't want to complain, and be accused of WP:OWN, I do...
Click to read more »other uses of the word "sandbox", see the page sandbox. Do you want your own sandbox? Create a user subpage. Click here to reset the sandbox. Shortcuts...
Click to read more »is true for Daniel Gomes. I totally get your passion for him to have his own article, but there is literally nothing that shows he's notable. You definitely...
Click to read more »own perspective and may also spot errors that others have missed or be able to contribute in ways that others cannot. If editors were allowed to own articles...
Click to read more »releases. Members of two notable bands are generally notable enough for their own article. For composers, songwriters, librettists or lyricists: Has written...
Click to read more »section with the pound (#) sign and wikipedia will number the section on its own. Use numbered lists instead of bulleted lists only if you will be talking...
Click to read more »line with Wikipedia policies, you should avoid linking to a site that you own, maintain, or represent—even if WP guidelines seem to imply that it may otherwise...
Click to read more »American·British–British·American Dictionary for English Speaking People or your own favorite/favourite reference. Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is a big place, with many editors, all with their own opinions on how to do things. It may seem surprising that we'd be able to work together...
Click to read more »We may be wrong – Use at your own risk – We are not doctors – We can't help with law – You may disagree with what we include This page has our disclaimer...
Click to read more »enough to allow editors from around the world to take part within their own time zones. The times also need to be flexible enough to allow articles to...
Click to read more »Simply state facts, cite the sources of them, and let the readers draw their own conclusions. Many people think... is often a lead-in to a bandwagon fallacy...
Click to read more »getting messages that are not for you, you can avoid this by creating your own account. If you cannot do this, it most likely means that doing so has been...
Click to read more »achievement. A good measure of achievement of notability for someone to have their own article, is whether or not they are featured in several other sources. More...
Click to read more »an article (like myself and others), make a suggestion, or even have your own section on Simple News by suggesting it here. Finally, a word about Spoken...
Click to read more »editorial time for this discussion. I also won't renew the request on my own. Thank you again, NonvocalScream (talk) 01:34, 14 October 2009 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »there weren’t so many articles, so I could actually create articles of my own and begin finding a place in the community. What do you think is the greatest...
Click to read more »important than the letter. Invoking the principle of ignore all rules on its own will not convince anyone that you were right, so you will need to try to...
Click to read more »abbreviation is used to mean the English Wikipedia. Other languages use their own codes. GFDL GNU Free Documentation License. Wikipedia articles used to be...
Click to read more »that's a bit stupid. They've stolen our Main Page!". But, if we have our own, that doesn't happen. Microchip • talk 15:08, 13 October 2008 (UTC) Honestly...
Click to read more »below.) Web-based reviews by amateur critics who have not established their own notability as critics are also not considered "significant coverage". Many...
Click to read more »another editor. The important part of hounding is ruining another user's own enjoyment of editing, or of the project generally, for no reason. If "following...
Click to read more »these covers the topics you are concerned with, you can always design your own award (using these examples, if you like). Here is a partial list of barnstar...
Click to read more »10 August 2009 (UTC) Oppose Sometimes comes across as those he thinks he owns the Simple project Soup Dish (talk) 10:25, 10 August 2009 (UTC) [source?]...
Click to read more »admins should never decline requests on their own blocks (though, they can always overturn their own blocks--unless they carried out community consensus...
Click to read more »orchestra • ore • organ • origin • outcrop • outlier • overlap • oval • own • oxidation Compound: offspring • oncoming • oneself • onlooker • onto •...
Click to read more »"per nom" !votes. WP:POLICY — We could probably use more policies of our own than looking at en.wikipedia policy. Let's create more proposed policy. WP:ST...
Click to read more »should not use "you". I don't own a cat nor will I ever own one; telling me that I must take care of the cat that I will own doesn't make any sense. Better...
Click to read more »their interest in the idea, and in Decemeber it was re-launched with his own ideas, and also included the new DYK? section that was omitted from the initial...
Click to read more »07:30, 28 July 2010 (UTC) I'm sorry, but I have to oppose per above, and my own observations. 3 months is pretty standard, and even users who have been here...
Click to read more »userbox}} This user creates their own userboxes. Transclusions {{User:Beaneater00/Userboxes/Userbox grower}} This user grows his own userboxen, just like his father...
Click to read more »mentioned there (even though I opposed the block). After this he evaded his own addiction by creating an undeclared sockpuppet account. I'm sorry, but all...
Click to read more »RfDing all of the pages in this category as Pokémon are not notable for their own articles imo. Should probably be redirected to something like List of Pokémon...
Click to read more »Attempting to force an untoward interpretation of policy, or impose your own novel view of "standards to apply" rather than those of the community. Example:...
Click to read more »sufficient importance, even relatively minor participants may require their own articles, for example Howard Brennan, a witness to the JFK assassination...
Click to read more »kind of simple project and Wiktionary should probably be imported into it's own namespace. Like Maximillion said on IRC the quotes would probably be better...
Click to read more »{{classproject| your project name}}, 3. Use the sandbox: have the students make their own sandbox. There are instructions on this page Wikipedia:User page. There is...
Click to read more »bigger one, but Kansas City, Kansas, is not an insignificant city in it its own right. So just be careful. StevenJ81 (talk) 13:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »seriously isn't much there. I was wondering if people could post here what their own personal standards are when looking at adminship candidates. J Di 17:31,...
Click to read more »exclusively pornographic content.", that made me think he was using his own personal opinion to decide whether or not the articles he deleted were worthy...
Click to read more »have respect for you, but I'm not sure about people who go against their own word. -- Mentifisto 00:07, 27 November 2009 (UTC) I've always been one to...
Click to read more »can have their own article... Basically; if they are notable as a group then they should have a group article, notable on their own, own article in this...
Click to read more »We may be wrong – Use at your own risk – We are not doctors – We can't help with law – You may disagree with what we include This page has our disclaimer...
Click to read more »templates). The template will spit out a bunch of red error text on its own page most likely but that will clear itself eventually. Just go back and...
Click to read more »their own standards, we have our own. – RyanCross (talk) 06:22, 24 October 2008 (UTC) this is the simple version of that site. If you want your own webpages...
Click to read more »do not need to credit yourself. Content which you have rewritten in your own words also does not need attribution. However, attribution must be done when...
Click to read more »exactly like autism but it's just milder. I don't think it should have its own article as it might confuse the readers. If we can just gain a consensus...
Click to read more »we don't. There is no case-by-case basis here. So I propose we create our own version of en's WP:ENGVAR here. Thoughts?-- † CM16 01:12, 16 April 2009...
Click to read more »This is currently scheduled for 7-11 May. The students each have their own account—pretty easy to identify, they all end in "smsb", and their userpages...
Click to read more »of some automatic script(s). I'm compiling my own simplewiki database for offline use, and running my own scripts I see there are many more images missing...
Click to read more »immediately recognise you (different people run the wiki here and we have our own stuff to do here and we are not the same as EN, just to let you know). No...
Click to read more »(tired of typing many colons) I don't own this wiki or rule it; there are many other editors that probably do more owning or ruling than I do. Feuding is unproductive;...
Click to read more »or make our own per the guideline at meta:Licensing update/Implementation. EhJJTALK 20:22, 1 July 2009 (UTC) I'd recommend we make our own. fr33kman talk...
Click to read more »article. His talk page could be construed as indicating he believes his own standards to be superior. Therefore, he violates consensus. This is not the...
Click to read more »of the best on the main page I think it's best to demote, and then in our own time bring them back up to scratch. That is the way this wiki seems to work...
Click to read more »stay pretty much the same. Certain languages (Dutch for example) have their own names, but still list the commonly accepted names and just note what the...
Click to read more »The second thing which really stuck out is the reversal of his own block, this on its own I was willing to ignore (until I noticed he did it twice which...
Click to read more »format, so each Project can add their own titles and their own selected articles and selected pictures to create their own Portal. I wish I knew how to write...
Click to read more »great it works on the English Wikipedia, I think that we should create our own version of this page on the Simple English Wikipedia in the instances where...
Click to read more »Ain (Readability says 1.67 and diff.) Checked 1 point Victor Hugo (to be simplified). - not checked as per your own comment here....
Click to read more »Huhsunqu replaced own upload Image:Banner_of_the_Qulla_Suyu.svg: trying to fix displaying; Used in: Aymara (local image page) Baerni replaced own upload Image:Lynx_kitten...
Click to read more »Gracias! 69.91.145.100 00:09, 21 August 2007 (UTC) You can create your own wikipedia, see m:Proposals for new projects and propose a Simple Spanish...
Click to read more »daily basis to do the work. This would be slightly hypocritical, but my own RFB failed for fairly "rediculous" reasons, such as not doing enough article...
Click to read more »BG7even 19:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC) Hello all, I do this in a section on its own, because the other two sections above are already getting lengthy. I'll keep...
Click to read more »locales have different opinions. Each US state is in charge of setting its own requirements (if it has any). Pennsylvania has little to no difference between...
Click to read more »individual users become the default for all users if added here, but the user's own settings take precedence. Some settings work only on this page. enable-all:true...
Click to read more »(UTC) Not really anyone. It has always just been a bit of a use at your own risk thing since most of its code doesn't/didn't work on simple, although...
Click to read more »places without their own administrative functions as well as the administrative divisions it already covers. Townships without their own local governments...
Click to read more »profession, dealing with problematic landlords/roommates/employers, managing your own scarce time, money, and resources, etc. The library (and also now the Internet)...
Click to read more »counting-mode, there is no set number of edits. Also note, that users have their own editing style, some do small edits, others do larger ones. If you are an...
Click to read more »of companies out there and we can certainly prove that they exist and who owns or runs them. But just being in existence as a company doesn't mean one is...
Click to read more »work well! You can see some of the current suggestions (and propose your own) on the Meta messaging page but I also want to encourage everyone to discuss...
Click to read more »meanings of film. Yottie =talk= 21:04, 21 March 2010 (UTC) Well, per your own argument, can you explain how "movie" can be ambiguous anywhere? The Rambling...
Click to read more »be strictly maintained. Votes will again be cast and counted on a server owned by an independent, neutral third party, Software in the Public Interest...
Click to read more »12:29, 4 January 2010 (UTC) Support - He has definitely learned from his own mistakes. Chenzw Talk 14:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC) Support - I may not have...
Click to read more »make a new article for your own product or website. Usually, when a person creates a new article describing his or her own work, it is because the work...
Click to read more »colorable wikilinked text, suitable for displaying a route or line name in its own color. The {{RoutemapRoute}} (shortcut: {{rmr}}) template can be used to...
Click to read more »Wilfred Campbell a Canadian poet. The festival might not be notable on it's own. So I am asking community, what they think will be the best action? Delete...
Click to read more »about such things. People also come here because they dislike the way their own native language wikis have devolved into process and complexity. This is...
Click to read more »his own actions (that contributed to the ban)". I don't see much evidence of this happening. Chenzw Talk 16:16, 6 August 2012 (UTC) PBP's own words...
Click to read more »links is as follows...WP:OUTING. But yeah all in all we should have our own. I was just pointing out there are no actual gaps. -DJSasso (talk) 00:07...
Click to read more »“articles” into their own languages. If successful, this could eventually allow everyone to read about any topic in Wikidata in their own language. As you...
Click to read more »still there. Lolcats20 (talk) 11:38, 4 May 2016 (UTC) I just conducted my own tests and found that the problem occurs when template:QD-multiple is used...
Click to read more »6 October 2007 (UTC) Agreed, I like it when the community develops it's own thing and doesn't copy it from another wikipedia. Oysterguitarist 14:47,...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:19, 19 July 2009 (UTC) (unindent) Each person is entitled to his own opinion. If you do not agree with what he thinks, I can only ask you to ignore...
Click to read more »break the revdel policy based on their own faulty understanding of the revdel policy - unfortunately, from my own reading of User talk:Chrissymad, I would...
Click to read more »needs to get it back up to speed. I am only saying this as posting 4 of my own hooks on the MP would be a bit of a bias. -- Da Punk '95 talk 04:10, 22...
Click to read more »accross to there? :) I(am)(ARice) 19:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC) To help our own discussion I put part of the discussion here. --Cethegus (talk) 12:54, 8...
Click to read more »We may be wrong – Use at your own risk – We are not doctors – We can't help with law – You may disagree with what we include This page has our disclaimer...
Click to read more »content, and a header. Currently, the three Nav* classes apply styles of their own. When mixing classes, this causes some of the Nav styles to override other...
Click to read more »have a one off. Notability is the issue here, a notable subject gets its own page. Useful, which is the criteria most have mentioned above doesn't enter...
Click to read more »specific for a number of dialects. "Platt"/"Plat" is generally the name for the own dialect. So, no to an extent merging these is probably problematic. --Eptalon...
Click to read more »critical, but not disgraceful. If you want disgraceful, have a look at CM's own (frequent) opposes. Majorly talk 17:51, 8 December 2008 (UTC) I don't want...
Click to read more »is being held at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Admins_reviewing_own_blocks, pleae do come and discuss. Jon@talk:~$ 08:43, 14 September 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »own the articles they create on Wikipedia content sites? Angela Kate Maureen (talk) 03:35, 19 August 2021 (UTC) @Tropical Storm Angela: No one owns any...
Click to read more »not working. I await further input (but i'm also going to come up with my own proposal that might work.) Cheers, BG7even 14:05, 14 December 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »things. The main reasons for the opposition during my 9th RfA were from WP:OWN and WP:BITE concerns, both of which I corrected by illiciting the help of...
Click to read more »people learning English read in their own language as most of my foreign friends do. To say they cannot read in their own language is nonsense there are so...
Click to read more »long as certain rules are followed. Users may use AI to translate their own text and ideas into English. This can be helpful because AI can help produce...
Click to read more »with their own walled garden, over time they are likely to expand into other aspects which will help round out the wiki as a whole. Our own focus on what...
Click to read more »registered users (not counting anons) and I think that in our own way we hold our own for relevance and quality. Sure we don't have articles for everything...
Click to read more »saying that flooding is disruption, and indeed the meta page, and now our own, is only a guideline, not a policy, and suggests that admins use it, not...
Click to read more »as soon as I removed its status and I am pretty sure that I reverted my own changes. Cheers, Razorflame 14:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC) Hello, the page WP:GA...
Click to read more »something. Maybe it's too Wikimedia-centric, or maybe it just needs to own up to being a Wikimedia topic; I'm not sure. Ideas? --Auntof6 (talk) 07:53...
Click to read more »30 December 2013 (UTC) I think the Tech News should have a page of its own. It has rather overwhelmed this page, and I notice editors are using this...
Click to read more »readers to voluntarily screen particular types of images strictly for their own account. Further details and educational materials will be available shortly...
Click to read more »every single issue that has been brought up in the past. I solved the WP:OWN, WP:BITE, and the canvassing issues in the past, and I have continued to...
Click to read more »small projects until they're large enough to merit a wikisource of their own), but I think that it and a simple English WikiNews seem to be the next things...
Click to read more »May 2015 (UTC) Since they created their own accounts already, the subpages might as well be under their own accounts. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:22, 5 May 2015...
Click to read more »free to choose an article from the list we wrote or pick up a topic of your own so long as it is close to the main theme and focusing on closing the gender...
Click to read more »much trouble for someone to make one, and if so, I'd like to make one on my own (but don't know how). Liam.gloucester 12:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC) Icelandic...
Click to read more »notable). We should not include every last hamlet, every atom, just to get its own perma-stub entry that's identical to enwiki. As I mentioned, we should be...
Click to read more »remain civil and don't yell. As for what you said, we will still be our own Wikipedia we just want to do what's easier and what's best for the community...
Click to read more »books" (is there a better term?) have become notable enough to have their own articles here, considering the sheer number of people who actually read these...
Click to read more »competing; it's trying to improve ourselves, and keep growing and expanding our own project, regardless of what happens at EnWP. Still, it's inevitable that...
Click to read more »clauses etc. into separate sentences and perform more complex tasks on its own (Machine translation from English to Simple English is much more easier than...
Click to read more »edits? Being that he is not an admin he would also not be able to undo his own mistakes in this case thus meaning the work would fall to an admin to clean...
Click to read more »with 4 blue links to scientists. What I also say: Two countries have their own lists, so re-adding scientits from those countries does not really help....
Click to read more »sourcing his edits. Or at least explain how to source and he can source his own. There were *many* other ways to go about this without blocking the editor...
Click to read more »suitable image can be found on Commons, use it. And you can always take your own too, upload to commons, and then use it here.--Peterdownunder (talk) 03:50...
Click to read more »unbanned elsewhere. Simple English Wikipedia is a separate Wikipedia in its own right, and should not need troublesome users referred to it." Shouldn't they...
Click to read more »still counted even though with the change they may not agree with their own vote. You suggested extending the voting when problems like this occur, I...
Click to read more »he swore numerous times on the RfA board and on my own talk page and inserted nonsense into his own RfA. He also inserted images of me (which I believe...
Click to read more »with over 150 edits/log actions (after getting adminship and not including own userspace) in the last six months. User is endorsed by two current bureaucrats...
Click to read more »what you worship, nor will you ever worship what I worship. You have your own religion and I have mine.” (Qur’an 110:1-6) . . . Do not say to one who offers...
Click to read more »could meet both ideas is some kind of banner at the top of ST linking to its own RFC discussion, or just let the topic die and go back to RFDing everything...
Click to read more »enough content to justify SOAP having its own page. The point on advertising and promotion already has its own point in NOT. Most to all of the information...
Click to read more »parallel articles that are simplier in language? Or is this going to form its own structure (one that's also simplier) in terms of templates, categories, articles...
Click to read more »Rambling Man (talk) 17:10, 30 June 2008 (UTC) I suppose we could have our own en:WP:IAR as well? Like everything else, discussion seems to have stalled...
Click to read more »not have our own page. As for Huggle we don't have the page because our wiki doesn't officially support Huggle since its a use at your own risk here. But...
Click to read more »@Derpdart56: And I prefer that people not strike out votes other than their own. If you feel you need to draw attention to a comment that's problematic in...
Click to read more »that gives a link to my monobook.js. You can easily adapt this for your own purposes: just copy the following: addOnloadHook(function () { addPortletLink...
Click to read more »English Wikipedia (or any other encyclopedia) and then rewrite them in your own words using simpler words and conecpts. Best, - Huji reply 16:55, 16 November...
Click to read more »immaturity/sockpuppetry/long term vandalizing, I wouldn't take the decision on my own. Pmlineditor Talk 08:31, 12 September 2009 (UTC) Q: With regards to protecting...
Click to read more »front page DYK, stating it's the only "... liquid mineral ..." while our own mineral article states that a mineral "must be solid". Suggest this DYK is...
Click to read more »of the fact that each and every Pokemon are not notable enough for their own pages. The histories should not be merged as per the above point made by...
Click to read more »for the wiki, whereas most who I berate are here only to use it as their own personal playground and seek to piss off as many of us as possible. Cheers...
Click to read more »situations like this I also don't believe an admin should be deleting their own speedies. I must say I am very disappointed in Synergy who its becoming more...
Click to read more ».please feel free to help out. Please help, I can't do it quickly on my own.-- † ChristianMan16 06:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC) If it doesn't require admin...
Click to read more »September 2016 (UTC) Does anyone actually speak or write Simple English as its own language, as opposed to using it temporarily as a way to learn normal English...
Click to read more »Articles breaking these rules will be deleted. Write the article in your own words. It is okay if your text is not perfect — that can always be fixed...
Click to read more »here more civilly and we need to start making longer discussions have their own pages to talk about them on. Simple Talk is just the cesspool for every single...
Click to read more »a thing on Wikipedia, I'm sure that this very post is a disaster on it's own. Thanks for all of what you guys do! You are awesome! X30phil1x (talk) 20:52...
Click to read more »Out There –talk– 18:44, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Every language has their own rules for this as we are all technically seperate communities. So for simple...
Click to read more »contribute to the Simple News. I would start work on November 19, 2010. My own inputbox for creation of new news articles: List of articles created: North...
Click to read more »"The exchanges we have had on our user talks make it seem like this is your own personal wiki" -- Microchip08 | He openly said he did not feel that way....
Click to read more »found here. In future, please ask questions on my user talk page, or on your own, where I will be able to see it. --Yottie =talk= 00:43, 14 February 2016...
Click to read more »devices are vital for conferences (whether of paper or silicon!). Prepare you own advert for SE on your device, so you can message others without loss of time...
Click to read more »this Template/Userbox page, I have made it so any user can update their own edit count accordingly. I have linked to this edit count site, it includes...
Click to read more »on articles that they have written in English, or translated from their own language to English. However, for this sort of collaboration to be successful...
Click to read more »regardless of how much I was learning English, I'd want that information in my own language. I'd want to be comfortable with what I was reading and how I was...
Click to read more »pictures to pages the same as on English Wikipedia. You just can't upload your own pictures. They have to be pictures from Commons. -DJSasso (talk) 13:12, 10...
Click to read more »talk:Thekohser. I wouldn't want an admin driving people off, because of their own mistakes. Majorly talk 17:18, 28 April 2009 (UTC) Can you read my reply and...
Click to read more »(UTC) Heh, no worries. But I do agree with Giggy, you should create your own sandbox, and do it there. Incase your coding becomes broked. Also, all the...
Click to read more »city) should be in Simple unless it is shown to be genuinely notable on its own account. Admittedly, we have difficulties in countries which do not have...
Click to read more »that we have enough requests for protection to warrant the creation of our own RFPP page yet, although, I must say that we are getting there. In a couple...
Click to read more »got it wrong ;) I didn't actually check with WMF devs, just going off my own back. Obviously the settings are different, so I probably missed a trick...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Do you guys think we should move the controversy section to its own article and put a link to it in Anish Kapoor? The fued with Semple over black...
Click to read more »MC Ambassadors will carry out their own activities and get financial support for enabling conversations in their own languages. Regional facilitators from...
Click to read more »like enWP does. While users may (and have) created Wikiprojects in their own userspace, they have never seen much use. With only 50 or so active editors...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:09, 20 April 2009 (UTC) (unindenting) Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but please do take note that whether your vote will be counted or...
Click to read more »RyanCross (talk) 10:32, 15 June 2008 (UTC) Actually, I found them on my own. But a few more lists would be help ful to me. -- RyanCross (talk) 10:46...
Click to read more »features a number of built in "variables" which you can change for your own use. To change the variables, just copy the following into your monobook...
Click to read more »for the position.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 15:10, 19 December 2009 (UTC) I also own an iTouch as well. Good luck:P —§ Snake311 (I'm Not Okay!) 00:23, 20 December...
Click to read more »enWP. Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 22:01, 20 October 2011 (UTC) So, they are your own work that just happens to be substantially the same as the text and references...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) You should be able to trust your own judgement in this matter. Take every of his edits on its own merit. It's quite easy to block him again should...
Click to read more »Majorly talk 10:14, 11 May 2009 (UTC) Yeah, using the word "fuck" isn't on its own incivil. GARDEN 20:11, 11 May 2009 (UTC) I know, Majorly and Garden, I...
Click to read more »There's no proof presented that this web site should have its own article. There are just 461 unique Google hits (hits 1 to 100)(hits 401 to 460) ......
Click to read more »from the company's own website (so they are not independent of the subject), and the French article has 2 from the company's own website and 2 links...
Click to read more »That's why we were set up, because many of them cannot understand even their own language in the prose of En wiki. Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:08, 24 December...
Click to read more »result of it? We would simply use enwiki's/common's FPs. We don't have our "own" pics. Barras (talk) 12:27, 21 September 2009 (UTC) This is the thing I must...
Click to read more »mainstream) on Simple English Wikipedia are often target to users adding in their own "fanon", such as an early change in the page for Numberjacks containing details...
Click to read more »and 2) if you are experienced with MediaWiki you can frame others for your own edits. Laptop Fizz (talk) 23:49, 27 March 2017 (UTC) There is a lot more...
Click to read more »Grunny (talk) 07:35, 23 March 2012 (UTC) Yes, in part because of Osiris' own words above -- "a problem-solver ... helpful and approachable" --Horeki (talk)...
Click to read more »We may be wrong – Use at your own risk – We are not doctors – We can't help with law – You may disagree with what we include This page has our disclaimer...
Click to read more »own, or you might need to do dummy edits on the pages. Try doing one dummy edit. It if clears the problem, the rest will probably clear on their own eventually...
Click to read more »Houses a few weeks ago. He suggested that Thai Houses should not be it's own article but that the content should be included in the Thailand article....
Click to read more »have to comment about it within the oversight request, it be limited by its own time. When that time comes, a bureaucrat will be able to determine consensus...
Click to read more »Ukrainian-language Wikipedia to unblock me? Thank you. Each wiki makes its own decisions. We cannot make decisions for another wiki. Sorry. Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »but even I don't know if that would be just notable enough to merit its own article). 172.112.210.32 (talk) 05:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC) Actually looking...
Click to read more »bots? I never got past the starting line. I quit the race and went down my own path. There is no leadership here to provide an overall plan. There should...
Click to read more »sources that are independent of the subject, they are notable enough for their own article. - Wikipedia:Notability (people) Very few people are notable enough...
Click to read more »noun in general. American English more often than not stands out on its own, and most Commonwealth countries follow Commonwealth English. One of the...
Click to read more »large mistake to stop the rollout here, in the end we would be trading our own temporary comfort for something designed specifically to make it easier for...
Click to read more »simple english which is different from regular english. You can create your own template in your userspace if you wish to see what others think of it. -Djsasso...
Click to read more »(UTC) Two ways to look at this: 1) Match other Wikipedias and 2) Do our own thing. 1) "Edit War" has an advantage: It is the same term used on the English...
Click to read more »- It is seen/It can be seen). If the person is learning English on their own, the passive voice is something that they need to know for them to be able...
Click to read more »only members of this group will be able edit CSS/JS pages that they do not own (that is, any page ending with .css or .js that is either in the MediaWiki:...
Click to read more »discographies for individuals should include only things released under their own name, not things released by a band. Comments? --Auntof6 (talk) 04:57, 25...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete I can only find social media links and his own website. That doesn't fulfill the notability criteria. Etoza (?) 16:37, 26...
Click to read more »they're entitled to vote right away. They are quite capable of making their own decisions. It's not sensible to drag things out artificially. Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »back to the start). Or you can create a draft that you can work on in your own time (see below). Whatever you choose, we encourage you to keep helping the...
Click to read more »we get our list of high priority articles? Do we identify them with their own category? (probably yes) The Rambling Man (talk) 14:03, 8 July 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »page, questionable on copyvio as it is apparently a copy of the editors own self description of their character on that site and as such seems to be...
Click to read more »December 2019 (UTC) Hi, and Welcome to wikipedia! Wikimedia already has its own donation page, which accepts Card, PayPal, and Amazon Pay. Hope that helped...
Click to read more »notable on their own, break out to their own article if you want more detail (unmerge gyrobus for example it should have stayed its own article), but as...
Click to read more »is not owned or controlled by the Wikimedia Foundation, but it does have several WMF staff members in it. It is run by volunteers on their own. The server...
Click to read more »2013 (UTC) Are you looking for such articles as a model for writing your own? If so, you might like to ask someone to be your mentor. We used to have...
Click to read more »like DYK, (V)GA etc. Also, there's no point to it imo as we don't have our own images. Cheers, Goblin 15:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC) Agree with above. We don't...
Click to read more »instrument that makes a musical sound ("a church bell") belong – v. to be owned by; to be a member of below – ad. lower than best – ad. the most good betray...
Click to read more »page seems to be about the red-tailed hawk, which already has a page of its own. What should I do about the stuff that is in the wrong place? Cut-and-paste...
Click to read more »talk 18:22, 3 January 2010 (UTC) 20 minutes won't break the wiki. Undo your own actions so that a discussion can take place. If you force other admins to...
Click to read more »this page. This help file would focus on helping new users create their own signatures here on the Simple English Wikipedia. I have been wanting to write...
Click to read more »they have several meanings. Phrasal verbs tend to have a life of their own. This is something which precludes them to be the tool of the foreign language...
Click to read more »event that the article's topic is not notable and has no potential for its own encyclopedic entry on Wikipedia. Deletion of a article can be one step backwards...
Click to read more »this can also be described in a section there, and as is doesn't need its own article. Note: Panda (of the series) was also replaced with a redirect to...
Click to read more »contribution to the RfA space. There are a few edits to your editor review (your own), a few reports to ViP, and a request for rollback. There are only four posts...
Click to read more »Movies and tv series I would not count as literature personally but as own categories, comics could be the only subcategory for style for the moment...
Click to read more »subpage. Imports should be few in number. Each import in a section on its own on AN, and archival will work as well. --Eptalon (talk) 21:21, 24 July 2010...
Click to read more »(User:Gwib/Archive_twelve#Retirement), my talk page (somewhere...), and his own talk page ([2]) (though, he deleted the warning afterwards). The warning...
Click to read more »page until the month has ended. At which point the May deaths go to their own month page (which had been a redirect) Deaths in May 2021. It is done this...
Click to read more »them over, and that's another way. Of course, everyone has to find their own best way of working. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:08, 12 December 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »a silly way. Every field of operation, every field of discipline has its own vocabulary. When we write about the science we expect the reader to know...
Click to read more »but I don't think you should unilaterally make such a page outside your own userspace. It should be discussed first. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:20, 3 September...
Click to read more »crippled by this rule, as almost every image invloving the Baha'i Faith is owned by the Baha'i World Center. They are available for free use as long as credit...
Click to read more »but it makes sense. English users feel more comfortable writing in their own language and more secure. Same with some ESL users. They feel secure in their...
Click to read more »programs in their context. If your affiliate/language project is developing its own education initiatives, please remember to take advantage of this newsletter...
Click to read more »over and over again. Once is enough. Other people are able to make their own minds up, and being pushy does not help the discussion. Discussion should...
Click to read more »very grateful if you could do it, since I have difficulties with writing my own Simpl:wikt-pages and tend to use {{wiktionarypar}} not that seldom instead...
Click to read more »obentomusubi 22:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC) If anyone has any ideas for our own iconthen please do tell and I will have a bash on Photoshop GIMP later today/tomorrow...
Click to read more »if he owns Ferraris? That makes him rich, not notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:30, 3 August 2018 (UTC) Delete not notable as more rich people own ferraris...
Click to read more »stubs is probably well known, but I don't really like them. If I had my own way, I'd eliminate them all and expect new creations to at least be a paragraph...
Click to read more »reason to oppose his RfA. The WP:OWN issues are all way overblown. He asked if he could be allowed to work at them at his own pace. He has shown that he is...
Click to read more »allow me to have some independence and allow others to concentrate on their own areas more effectively. Ottava Rima (talk) 02:28, 25 February 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »users with another name? How do you create one of them? Does it run on its own and what does it do? I thought these Users are just people with the name...
Click to read more »I'm a little surprised at having to remind such a regular editor about WP:OWN... Kennedy (talk) 12:25, 13 December 2012 (UTC) I didn't actually say they...
Click to read more »remember, this is simple english. Each language can put the articles in their own wikipedia if they choose. I do not personally know of another way to convert...
Click to read more »Media, a business owned by the person as claimed in the article. It appears that Aisaki Media is not legally a ‘company’ and has no own website. I can only...
Click to read more »enough to be worthy of a mention in its own right Genre warriors almost never provide sources beyond their own knowledge, blogs, YouTube and MySpace. Reliable...
Click to read more »person will eventually come to your aid but if you press all you can on your own before any help arrives, it may be too late. So, don't give up your idea...
Click to read more »is recognizable and a likely search term but perhaps not notable on his own. Though usually the book is linked to that they are in, but not always. And...
Click to read more »29 July 2009 (UTC) Well, we do not need total votes. If we make here our own criteria, like at least 25 votes are needed, I think no-one will argue, when...
Click to read more »Coverage must be substantive and come from sources that are not the museum's own promotional materials. Quick considerations: State the museum's location...
Click to read more »that claim. This should not be seen as POV. It is not a POV whether one ownes slaves or not. As far as the NPOV on the Death penalty, Either way can feel...
Click to read more »to remove comments from your own talk page. I find it strange that a user such as this would go ahead and issue his own warnings when it is obvious that...
Click to read more »television channel in the Philippines. Not notable enough for a list of its own. Osiris (talk) 09:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »RfBs because he believed we need no more. And here he is conducting his own. Perfectly logical reason for an oppose, so the tone can be dropped IMO....
Click to read more »here and here. In his previous RfA (essay mania), he was accused of WP:OWNing articles and WP:BITE-ing new users. However, I believe he has worked that...
Click to read more »for the reason: Doesn't appear to be notable on its own, or at the very least, doesn't warrant its own article. I propose we create the article for the band...
Click to read more »in Indian mythology, it doesn't look like this is notable enough for its own article. Osiris (talk) 06:35, 12 October 2013 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »November 2018 (UTC) He does technically own copyright (CC-BY-SA 3.0) to what he writes in articles, and owns copyright on the images that he hasn't released...
Click to read more »wouldn't it make sense if the logos were the same as the ones on their "own language" Wikipedia? Soup Dish (talk) 11:22, 16 March 2009 (UTC) The thing...
Click to read more »This Google search confirms this. Even though it has it's own website, it doesn't have it's own English Wikipedia page, and I don't think that it fits the...
Click to read more »Administrators should not protect or unprotect a page to further their own position in a content dispute. So, the answer is No, unless for some reason...
Click to read more »by User:Blockinblox. The current link goes to EN, I'd prefer to have our own version of Wikipedia:Searching. I'll give it a go when I have a bit of time...
Click to read more »friends (the ones listed above) hacked into my account... They had their own account, and I was angry with them for hacking into mine, so I lied to Jeffpw...
Click to read more »QD requests that I would have more time for editing if he/she had their own delete button. --Peterdownunder (talk) 23:21, 5 April 2009 (UTC) Support...
Click to read more »understand you (Vivekbhat9) correctly, you want to know how to start your own wiki, not how to contribute to Simple English Wikipedia. You'll need to install...
Click to read more »both genders compete in the same tournaments but separately, with their own championships. So in most cases in sport, where competitors are separated...
Click to read more »the WP:OWN policy. I therefore recommend that Macdonald-ross be blocked for a few days, both as a short-term preventative measure against WP:OWN violations...
Click to read more »made the request wants to hurry the process along, he or she can post their own reminder. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC) Ok.Reception123/Receptie123...
Click to read more »an article on the TV show, the awards can be a section in there. On their own, the awards of the show are likely not notable (and we lack context). Anyway...
Click to read more »opinion. Advocacy is the writing mistake of sounding like you are writing your own point of view. It is often called POV-pushing. Sometimes Wikipedians think...
Click to read more »is not based on edit count, nor any other set factors. Everyone has their own reasons to type the words "support" or "oppose". —MC8 (b · t) 22:28, Monday...
Click to read more »to be a large part of the universal lore though, so it may not need its own article. We are not talking Spinal Tap, Josie and the Pussycats or even Gem...
Click to read more »our own policy (which I don't believe we do in this case), we use enwiki's as a guideline. Of course, that's not to say that we can't add our own versions...
Click to read more »project you've actively worked on that you want to make your own rules and do your own thing. That's not how any Wikipedia works. This is a cooperatively...
Click to read more »to add something to MediaWiki:Common.js, as the toolbox doesn't have it's own MW page (I think). – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 20:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »and will your relationship with atheists be different from users of your own faith? Griffinofwales (talk) 14:08, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Hmm, I'm not sure...
Click to read more »mention in an article about Sony Pictures, but does not need an article of its own. Yottie =talk= 18:54, 24 July 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »related shows with their own storylines, which makes him bigger than any one of those shows. Each article stands or falls on its own merits, but personally...
Click to read more »internetexecutive for it's sources as well as it's own website. Googling the name of IFIC shows their own website, linkedin, and some other stuff. That's...
Click to read more »seemed unrelated to the topic of the sub-page. I later TW reverted (AGF) my own edit and thought, nah, I'll AGF here and let it go. This, however, got me...
Click to read more »(UTC) I decided to base the articles because it takes to long to write my own stuff, and I don't know what to put into my articles. TurboGolf 18:10, 19...
Click to read more »AethistMan19? You even mentioned in your attempt to explain you don't push your own view that you are a conservative. You have left various template "happy easter"...
Click to read more »would be notable to have its own article. Enwiki has an article about the Isla Vista murders, and instead of having his own article, Elliot Rodger's infobox...
Click to read more »accidental, then is ok. No, I won't ignore you on wiki, I am well within my own right to request diffs... if you don't provide them then that is your option...
Click to read more »I am also a bit concerned with the pattern of talking to himself on his own user talk page. Chenzw Talk 14:04, 8 March 2018 (UTC) Please ping me when...
Click to read more »If a user removes a comment from their own talk page it should not be restored. By removing the comment the user has verified that they have read it....
Click to read more »notable. Most information on Google appears to be links to facebook and his own website. The article reads like a bit of self promotion. Peterdownunder (talk)...
Click to read more »Towelie is a minor character on South Park, and shouldn't be included in its own article. I suggest a list of South Park characters be created, and then this...
Click to read more »Rizz exists as its own article because of how notable it has become but this string of four words is not notable enough for its own article. — *Fehufangą...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be notable enough for its own article. Not eligible for A4 as A4 doesn't apply to quotes. --Ferien (talk)...
Click to read more »suggested, the editor is also having issues with humility and accepting his own mistakes with grace. There also seems to be some (false) impression that...
Click to read more »user from editing any talk page except his/her own. Right now we are not going to block access to his/her own talk page, because nothing has been done to...
Click to read more »The template is only used in the creator's own user space and he/she do not have any edits out of their own userspace. What seems weird to me is that Rohaanhaq123...
Click to read more »not a patroller. I used to patrol on ENWP, but my concern here is that my own articles aren't being patrolled. I want other user's input on them, and the...
Click to read more »Those links are on English Wikipedia, which is a separate site with its own admins. You need to ask for help over there. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:37, 7 February...
Click to read more »little from his recent one-year ban. This week Jonas has chosen to (in his own words, yet), "butt in" after I answered a personal attack from Berserkerus...
Click to read more »editors or admins there, and they are more than capable of expressing their own opinion. Just read the feedback on en.wp, talk to the admins. If you think...
Click to read more »mention in an article about Sony Pictures, but does not need an article of its own. Yottie =talk= 18:54, 24 July 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »closes the request. In general matters, the opinions of IP editors, in my own opinion, are just as important as registered users' because they're still...
Click to read more »should keep a sharp eye for hoax articles like these. We might have our very own strain of the "North Carolina" vandal. PullToOpen Talk 03:34, 14 December...
Click to read more »redacted> STEPHEN, MY HUSBAND, UNDOUBTEDLY USED THIS ADDRESS IN CREATING HIS OWN ACCOUNT A FEW YEARS AGO. STEPHEN PASSED AWAY ON JANUARY 8, 2013. SINCE THEN...
Click to read more »We don't have articles about plot points unless they are notable on their own (and I don't know if any are). See Wikipedia:Notability for information on...
Click to read more »personal attack, plus we shouldn't be removing a user's comments from his own talk page. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:36, 17 May 2013 (UTC) Hey folks, As you may...
Click to read more »And while I'm here, I'll note that videos do not show notability on their own --Ferien (talk) 18:30, 5 May 2022 (UTC) EFEM (edit · talk · history · links...
Click to read more »deletion was to Keep. per snow. No standing !votes for deletion apart from my own. Lauryn Ashby (d) 22:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC) Ophélie Bretnacher disappearance...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Not enough criticisms to justify its own page. Merge to Pedro Sánchez and redirect. I am also including the category...
Click to read more »no press coverage. This is a startup looking for attention by having its own article. Blissyu2 (talk) 15:44, 24 September 2021 (UTC) Comment: - There...
Click to read more »article Ruyan. None of the three has enough information to require their own article. (En: has all under the single article for the company) All three...
Click to read more »who arrived later ought to create a new section on AN to request for their own rights, not hijack another editor's thread. Chenzw Talk 03:48, 21 June...
Click to read more »several people, I don't think anyone would argue against canvassing our own wiki. Looking at Huji's list of the 20 most active contributors by month...
Click to read more »in an article on one of his works, these places are not notable for their own entries. Nuk'Em'All with impunity. Pure Evil (talk) 20:48, 11 December 2022...
Click to read more »section of comments I made in good faith. While removal of comments on your own page is kosher, using rollback to do it isn't. When I warned him that that...
Click to read more »notable. Primary and middle schools are typically not notable enough for their own Wikipedia article unless they have received significant independent coverage...
Click to read more »having an agent, or being credited in a film or series is not enough on its own. The person needs in-depth coverage from sources that are not connected to...
Click to read more »17 September 2017 (UTC) Users are allowed to remove warnings from their own talk page if they wish. We shouldn't create an edit war with them by continually...
Click to read more »you are related to does not justify an article on wiki. No notability on own. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 22:43, 22 March 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »appropriate, but PBP needs to look at how to treat those who spend hours of their own time reviewing something that they may not be interested in, but are interested...
Click to read more »ours as a fork of the original. Once it came here it became its own thing at its own location. I forked a clean version of updated code to a new location...
Click to read more »("Somewhere Out There" through "Somewhere Out There 5" were all created from his own IP. The rest were created using open proxies (now blocked). Aside from the...
Click to read more »goal carom billiards games is to score points or "counts" by bouncing one's own ball, called a cue ball, off of the other two balls on the table. more.....
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Not enough content to justify its own article. Suggest merge with Xbox 360 Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 14:58, 5 May 2011...
Click to read more »only, open, opposite, or, orange, order, other, our, out, outside, over, own page, pain, paint, pair, pan, paper, parent, park, part, partner, party,...
Click to read more »notability independent of Pou, the first game in the series, to warrant its own page instead of a mention in that article, which is the case on the standard...
Click to read more »know that this atoll has a local gobernment, but this does not need its own article. Information such as the current composition (including what person...
Click to read more »page seems to establish that this person exists and that they run their own businesses, however doesn't seem to me to establish notability. One of the...
Click to read more »in its own right is another thing entirely, and the simple answer is probably not. On a Harry Potter wiki this would definitely have its own article...
Click to read more »they feel is improper, because it's really hard for a person to judge their own actions as inappropriate sometimes. So, I would obviously need to know what...
Click to read more »single article (article, not artical) of which you claim ownership of. No one owns any article. Essentially all of your edits to the wikipedia namespaces (wiki...
Click to read more »drawing about encyclopedic subjects are better equipped to develop their own style in more creative genres. Because all articles in Wikipedia must conform...
Click to read more »strong look at his userpage and reconsider if the way its set up is in his own best interests, since it was a pretty large factor in the ban in the first...
Click to read more »I believe in respect for what ever anyone wishes to do in and with their own lives an' it harm none. In these talks I've seen Aaron change drastically...
Click to read more »of "discography" in the title. If the musician is notable enough on his own, an article could be created about him, but not with this title. Auntof6...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't warrant its own article. The current article is complex and unsourced. Some information could...
Click to read more »the world's highest-paid model by Forbes. In 2021, Jenner began making her own tequila, known as 818 Tequila. more... Other good articles – Proposals –...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) CM, do you think that when you oppose, you could provide your own reason? You often seem to hide behind everybody else. Juliancolton (talk)...
Click to read more »are I guess, it's notable enough for its own article. I think any "spinoffs" of it should not deserve their own article, they are not as notable and don't...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Does not need own article. Bobherry Talk My Changes 21:32, 9 May 2023 (UTC) Delete because...
Click to read more »These two cities have such large populations that they can support their own category trees. In these cases, the people categories are usually limited...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: The subject is not notable enough to have its own article 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 20:35, 2 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »the page and leave them a note. Being blocked means he can't even edit his own userpage. How should he remove this stuff then? -Barras (talk) 11:13, 4 December...
Click to read more »on its own, its just a subsection of another template. As such the fact its all red links isn't as big a deal as it will never be used on its own, and the...
Click to read more »is any different from any other country and particularly notable in its own right (it even begins "as in any other country". This honestly reads almost...
Click to read more »notable only to their owners or occupants typically do not warrant their own article. Quick considerations: Establish why this specific building is notable...
Click to read more »his third edit was to User:Snow funn at tall and placed a barnstar on his own talk page. I suspect he's been here before. EhJJTALK 22:51, 3 June 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Using accounts to avoid problematic edits being linked is abuse on its own. This may require further technical investigation.. CUs? Griff (talk) 04:22...
Click to read more »(UTC) I think the accounts should not be shared. The teacher should have his own account and name there all accounts in context with his project. Then one...
Click to read more »protection measures. This makes the products illegal to sell, and perhaps to own in some EU countries, and the US. However, this does not make the company...
Click to read more »itself, but not worth an article of its own. --Bärliner 11:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC) Delete Not worth its own article. Razorflame 15:55, 25 February 2008...
Click to read more »Simple English Wikipedia." What do you consider your block then? Why (in your own words) were you blocked and what steps have you taken (or will you take)...
Click to read more »operation. You are the one causing problems and you have to live with your own actions. I have a clean conscience. Blockinblox - talk 21:18, 27 March 2009...
Click to read more »October 2007 (UTC) Redirect - until there is enough content to warrant for its own article. --Eptalon 19:26, 5 October 2007 (UTC) Redirect to Final Fantasy...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete On its own not notable. Way too far from our current understanding of the elements to merit its own article.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable outside its own "universe". The page has been here since 2006 BRP ever 13:22, 13 November...
Click to read more »nothing presented in the article convinces me it should have an article of its own. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:09, 15 July 2008 (UTC) Merge into either the...
Click to read more »part of the Lierna Castle complex and is likely not notable enough on its own to be anything more than a redirect to Lierna Castle, if that article was...
Click to read more »that seems easy to understand to me". It is a created language with its own vocabulary and grammar restrictions. If a word is not in that vocabulary...
Click to read more »but not simple fits into our QD's. The subject-matter was so far from my own experience that I decided not to act. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:31, 26 October...
Click to read more »don't think I appreciate another project's problems, becoming our own. Let En fix it's own importing issue, it is not our "exporting issue". Best, Jon@talk:~$...
Click to read more »Merge into Nobility. I can't really see anything here that deserves its own article, but it is simple enough that a merge into nobility will be useful...
Click to read more »that Iranian Canadian banker who fled to Canada has invested in properties owned by Mizrahi developments and there has been legal dispute about financial...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:53, 6 July 2017 (UTC) It's not 'outing'. They listed that on their own pages and I, on their behalf, would request better treatment than what I've...
Click to read more »fix it. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done...
Click to read more »in the Basketball article; when it's large enough, it can be moved to its own article. --Eptalon (talk) 21:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC) Comment: - That's what...
Click to read more »however, I know that Chenzw has his own interpretation of what WP:DEAL means. I will probably put down my own questions sometime later today. Naleksuh...
Click to read more »Musicians who satisfy at least one of the requirements below can have their own Wikipedia articles because there is likely to be a good amount of reliable...
Click to read more »articles that share a common theme or topic. Each Wikiproject develops its own rules, and many such groups have struggled to keep going, due to the limited...
Click to read more »iamyungprince.com is a dead link (see Twitter). The article says he established his own company but I can't find anything related to that. richardsonmgmtllc.com...
Click to read more »(talk) 05:51, 29 August 2009 (UTC) That is incorrect, A user does not own his own talk page (or user page for that matter) because it is provided by the...
Click to read more »automatically transfer across wikis, so each case must be judged on its own merit. Kansan (talk) 21:34, 23 April 2010 (UTC) Yeah, but in the past, this...
Click to read more »July 2022 (UTC) Redirect to Barney & Friends. Not notable enough on its own. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 02:17, 15 July 2022 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: For now a dicdef. But–other bridge types have own articles, some substantial. Probably can be kept if expanded and language...
Click to read more »make absolutely no mention of this person. Personal and corporate websites owned by the Jain family are cited liberally (although several used as references...
Click to read more »internet. In my opinion, this subject is not sufficiently unique to merit its own article. Yes, there's racism, yes there are other forms of hate speech (like...
Click to read more »Redirect for now This is the sort of thing that could be a good article on its own if it were fully fleshed out. (Just because en.wiki doesn't have something...
Click to read more »target account is not, in most cases, a bar to usurpation. Both accounts are owned by the same person. If the user can demonstrate that the target account...
Click to read more »to be editing to make the article readable; he seems to regard it as his own personal page which no-one else can change. I also suspect that this user...
Click to read more »low end. For me (personal edits obviously as I can't judge others on my own numbers), 320 a week is low, to Razorflame, 320 is a slow day. Each person...
Click to read more »tend to delete, but I'm not sure about a policy. I think we don't have our own. Furthermore, I'm not familar with enwiki's policies. If we don't have one...
Click to read more »and/or devices to talk or vote on this wiki, he probably didn't see his own vote or didn't refresh his page. DingoTalk 17:14, 25 February 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »work area or desk, then grabbing items to throw away. Even if they don't own those items, they are typically answerable for why those items are missing...
Click to read more »business association. Not many sources about the subject specifically on their own. Gordonrox24 | Talk 23:27, 25 December 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »list, and I don't see how this is notable /useful enough to warrant its own article. Fehufanga (talk) 04:47, 25 December 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete Piggy-backing on Amir Farhand. Not notable in its own right. Blissyu2 (talk) 03:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »Voceditenore (talk) 09:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC) Shariful Islam Naik is writing his own article in lieu of becoming notable in real life. All the "sources" are self-generated...
Click to read more »independent coverage in reliable sources — not press releases, not its own website, and not directory listings. Coverage must be substantive, not just...
Click to read more »uploaded all the CHU/U templates to make this easy for other people. I did my own clerking here (en.wp admin - did it before) and everything seems fine - Ali-oops...
Click to read more »The different sections/"places" are too short to make articles of their own (apart from lacking references, different story), and I am also not sure...
Click to read more »I'm stunned we are even discussing this. A friendship is not worthy of its own separate article, and I question if it's even worth mentioning as a section...
Click to read more »it yet, I'll userfy it onto my own userspace. I'm a decent person, and I made that page with no intention to use my own research for it. I read, mark a...
Click to read more »it doesnt warrant its own article. Harlem675 13:58, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Redirect to Pokemon definitely not notable enough for own article. Malinaccier...
Click to read more »should not have it's own article. Not notable and joke. Illusion Flame (talk) 02:10, 14 May 2023 (UTC) Delete Not notable enough for own article. Bobherry...
Click to read more »The references (2 dead links, the subject's own web page and a page created by the subject with his own biography) are not reliable sources. The subject...
Click to read more »I will ask as many as possible to make accounts. If teachers make their own, they may be more likely to continue to edit. But, I don't want people to...
Click to read more »term "Afro-Gypsy," an interview with exactly one musician who owns that it is his own personal term. I found no sources showing that the term is in general...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable enough for its own article. On en it is a redirect to Croatia–Serbia border dispute but we don't...
Click to read more »reason: I declined QD but the character doesn't appear to be notable in its own right. --IWI (talk) 11:48, 21 June 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable enough for it's own article, it is a character in a cartoon series. Contains OR, questionable...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete as own synthesis. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:55, 24 July 2018 (UTC). It's OK now....
Click to read more »BlackWidowMovie0 (talk) 18:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC) You don't need to vote on your own proposals. Secondly, we don't not have clerks. We just don't formally have...
Click to read more »and in my opinion, the use of Krett12's template outside of the user's own userspace would violate WP:Be kind. Traditionally, we do allow wide latitude...
Click to read more »here. But determine access on a case by case basis. (i.e. Each on their own merits.) Meaning that banned users active here might lose their editing priveledges...
Click to read more »But, if I think about it, I caused it myself for disruption. It was my own choice, that I didn't think ahead, that 1) I was doing something stupid,...
Click to read more »criteria when creating articles, massive uploading of copyrighted images as own work. I suggest to follow this user closely as he is very likely to do the...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I think it deserves its own page. For now, it redirects to a page with no info on the topic. So, delete...
Click to read more »for the reason: Doubtful the character is notable enough to warrant its own article. IWI (chat) 20:37, 20 July 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »make an article with. I cannot even find support for her being French. Hew own website lists she's a grad of Southern Utah University with a Bachelor of...
Click to read more »Notability isn't established through reliable sources. Many sourecs are his own works. Others suffer from Nigerian news source issues. CountryANDWestern...
Click to read more »many pages. The pp-indef template also has an internal error showing on its own page. As it is not used, we may want to just remove it from the nav template...
Click to read more »the page alone. TV Show News Man (talk) 10:35, 3 August 2022 (UTC) Nobody owns any page on Wikipedia, and any editor is free to edit it, unless some sort...
Click to read more »would soon be available for adminship, and it would be nice for one of our own to be able to promote them and handle name change requests. I've been an...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not really notable for its own article. Nunabas (talk) 19:29, 19 August 2019 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Lecturers and journalists don't get their own articles and fail the GNG criteria. No sign of notability, and poorly referenced...
Click to read more »for the reason: Does not show notability. Single reference is to subject's own website. Rus793 (talk) 18:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »2021 (UTC) Delete with current sources, not notable enough to have its own article.--🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 11:41, 11 November 2021 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable enough for its own article. Osiris (talk) 02:08, 4 October 2013 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »the band, en:The Party (band). I conclude that the band members on their own are likely not that well-known. So, delete? Eptalon (talk) 20:48, 24 May...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Cannot find reliable sources except their own website. MathXplore (talk) 04:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »Aragón is only good source that focuses on him. All the others are either his own posts or statistics on his social media. Best, Aranya (talk) 14:07, 23 October...
Click to read more »Padres89 (talk) 20:53, 6 November 2021 (UTC) Delete it's soon to have its own article on wikipedia.--🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 11:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »doesn't seem to have its own IMDB page. The character Bling-bling boy checks out as part of Johnny Test, but I'm not sure he has his own show. This looks like...
Click to read more »collaborative, non-profit wiki. It is a coordination wiki that owns other Wikipedia logos and domains.It owns over 35 million content pages in all and is based on...
Click to read more »Aligarh Muslim University per nom. Not enough significant coverage for its own article, but I found some sources that can be used for a section within the...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Not notable enough on his own. It isn't even clear which TV show he is from or whether that is notable...
Click to read more »self-promotional. Rus793 (talk) 15:45, 4 December 2016 (UTC) Delete. A legend on their own talkpage. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »if they have not been, included in the article Israel. This is just my own personal view, I don't see that the article has potential for expansion....
Click to read more »requires this nomination. The characters are not notable enough for their own article. Information should at the very least be merged with the main article...
Click to read more »dresscode for India National male dresscode for India Every country has their own traditional clothing, but is that equal to a national dresscode ? A national...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Unnecessary to have an article of its own. Would merge but Raj Kapoor's popularity in Russia is not even mentioned...
Click to read more »(UTC) at first i was unsure, but now yes Keep the subject deserves its own article. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 00:16, 11 November 2021 (UTC) Keep Seems...
Click to read more »parts of the world; heck I don't even expect every notable person in my own city to be a household name either! I do have some issues with the article:...
Click to read more »English Wikipedia, each area code has its own article, plus if a state has more than one area code, the list has its own page as well. That's 30-40 articles...
Click to read more »what I can say is that unblock requests made by a blocked user on their own talk page, regardless of merit, must be left on the page for administrators...
Click to read more »publicly released in theatres or to video, should usually not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines...
Click to read more »few minor results. English wiki has no page. References not supportive (own website and youtube). Kennedy (talk) 16:52, 9 January 2013 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »article must be based on reliable, independent sources, not the institution's own website, prospectus, or promotional materials. Avoid academic boosterism:...
Click to read more »article on any other wikipedia. In fact, no character from the anime has their own article (At least on the English Wikipedia). Gaismagorm (talk) 16:04, 19...
Click to read more »stated that you are a member of The Fine Bas. Creating an article of your own band may present a conflict of interest. Fehufanga (talk) 14:20, 28 December...
Click to read more »to justify this redirect, and I don't see any countries that have their own national insect. MathXplore (talk) 06:50, 8 October 2022 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »♮ ✉ Talk page 08:10, 31 March 2022 (UTC) Looks like you can submit your own news to MVDN and Fox43 (there's a clear disclaimer at the bottom: Information...
Click to read more »(talk) 08:31, 27 May 2022 (UTC) Delete - These days anyone can make their own token given they have enough money to start it out. This is just using Simple...
Click to read more »reading ease, DYK nominations, various comments on Simple Talk and on my own talk page). Whether or not these issues are due to inability to work well...
Click to read more »WWII. I don't think that part of mathematical history merits a fork on its own. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:04, 7 October 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »is nominated here so I'm deleting only that one. Any other page needs its own nomination --Auntof6 (talk) 20:17, 18 October 2022 (UTC) List of Crayola...
Click to read more »coverage in reliable sources or that this name is sufficiently notable for its own article. Osiris (talk) 02:11, 11 October 2013 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »moved to Amish with unreferenced tag, is not notable enough to have its own article. Best wishes, --@intforce 16:47, 21 September 2012 (UTC) Amish dating...
Click to read more »page about this topic on enwiki. Wondering if it is real and deserves its own page here? << S O M E G A D G E T G E E K >> (talk) 15:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not really notable for its own article. Nunabas (talk) 19:29, 19 August 2019 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Merge with Bop It - it's not notable enough for its own article, but we should mention it somewhere in the Bop It page. J991 17:12...
Click to read more »in any news, the only items on the web I can find mentioning her are her own YouTube channel, with 7,000 subscribers. Fixing26 (talk) 23:55, 3 April 2021...
Click to read more »lot of original research or reporting. I don't think it's worthy of its own article...if there's anything of value, it should be merged to the Napoleon...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be notable enough to warrant its own article. Coverage of the company is limited. Enwiki has a small section about...
Click to read more »independent critical acclaim, but this is another case of "famous on his own YouTube account". Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:02, 25 July 2015 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »just a one-sentence article at the moment, I have added the sentence to its own section in the Acapulco article, and replaced this 'Playones' and 'Playones...
Click to read more »the other gender, or I am homosexual, then I am mostly interested in my own gender, or I am bisexual, then it's both of the cases. This article here...
Click to read more »linked him to WP:CW, but he disregards what I say. He says that it is his own work so he doesn't have to attribute or they are complete rewrites of these...
Click to read more »Not a notable fictional character. Sure, Cocomelon might be notable in its own right, but that doesn't mean that every character in it is notable. — *Fehufangą...
Click to read more »his manager (if hat info is current), and not for things she did on her own.--Eptalon (talk) 10:30, 23 October 2022 (UTC) Lene Bausager (edit · talk...
Click to read more »15:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC) Keep - it is a place, it exists, it even has its own category on Wikicommons [1], lots of mentions on flickr, instagram, it is...
Click to read more »Not a notable fictional character. Sure, Cocomelon might be notable in its own right, but that doesn't mean that every character in it is notable. — *Fehufangą...
Click to read more »Delete Of note, there is a character called Forky from Toy Story who had his own series [1] that has a list of episodes on EN [2] however that doesn't seem...
Click to read more »mainly a rehash of the plot and does not appear to be notable enough for its own article. Suggest merging with the series article Peterdownunder (talk) 07:09...
Click to read more »have opinions on things. They just try to tell facts. Uncyclopedia has its own opinions about things. These opinions are often silly. For example, Uncyclopedia...
Click to read more »take into account the poor sorcing, is this event notable enough on its own, to be keepable? Eptalon (talk) 15:57, 23 October 2022 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »are used for this very reason, people who aren't notable enough on their own so they get redirected to what they are most known for. -Djsasso (talk) 17:41...
Click to read more »Thanks. Nifky^ 12:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC) Done I'd put these in their own sub-heading as there is no ' case to place them in the Jonas Brothers socks...
Click to read more »material originating from him may the support Ministry's own notability, but it does not support his own notability. I couldn't find any independent coverage...
Click to read more »independent technology publications and academic sources, not the developer's own documentation, blog, or press releases. Do not write about software you have...
Click to read more »juniorRestrictions apply to junior editors only. Not all albums need their own Wikipedia article. An album may be notable enough for a separate article...
Click to read more »permanently. Incivility and wheel-warring is not acceptable for an admin. In BG7's own words, "it's twats like him that give us the bad name". Wheel warring does...
Click to read more »be moved to the MediaWiki namespace, or it might sound like I would be "owning" it, because it is stored in my user namespace) or creating and fixing templates...
Click to read more »It's not AI-generated it's created by my own words. Close it now. It's not AI-generated I created it by my own words. ~2025-29393-91 (talk) 06:37, 20 October...
Click to read more »added, content can be merged to family, if it is not enough to warrant its own article. In the case no refs can be found/are added, we can also delete this...
Click to read more »Kathleen Hughes — this is a sustained body of work as a filmmaker in her own right, not a single inherited credit. She also holds authority control records...
Click to read more »here, which maybe people will comment on, or else make their own suggestion: Keep as own article. Move relevant information and redirect. And if so, where...
Click to read more »Evil (talk) 02:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC) No, it seems well known of its own accord. fr33kman 20:00, 10 October 2023 (UTC) Given that 2/3 (16 out of 25)...
Click to read more »and Merge SQR codes into QR codes, it has it's own article in enwiki. I'm not sure why it's not it's own article in the first place. RiggedMint 19:19,...
Click to read more »for the reason: This redirect seems to be more of a test or the author's own vision - I haven't found such a term for Sterilization of Native American...
Click to read more »