Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following one or more categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
your changes. Use the talk page when you are not sure or when you want to suggest a change. Shortcuts WP:NPAWP:NPA WP:NOPAWP:NOPA WP:ATTACKWP:ATTACK...
Click to read more »—MC8 (b · t) 23:02, Saturday May 9 2009 (UTC) WP:NPA, WP:NPA , WP:NPA , WP:NPA ,WP:NPA and WP:NPA! Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 11:05, 10 May 2009...
Click to read more »09:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC) STRONG Oppose - almost like a violation of NPA! << S O M E G A D G E T G E E K >> (talk) 14:17, 21 October 2015 (UTC) Oppose...
Click to read more »applicable here Shopno866 (talk) 00:14, 3 May 2026 (UTC) Please review WP:NPA. -Barras talk 00:21, 3 May 2026 (UTC) Delete enwiki shows a very clear picture...
Click to read more »They referred to the content, not contributor, which is exactly what WP:NPA recommends. --IWI (talk) 04:41, 1 January 2021 (UTC) I would hardly call...
Click to read more »deserves adminship so greatly, but still some grumpy and careless users (NPA, I know) deny with anyway. You are a great user, but I suggest you wait about...
Click to read more »mention that DJ continues to take NPA-esque pot shots at me? Since he's done it more than four times, I had to give him an NPA-4 warning. Do we really want...
Click to read more »contributing to Wikipedia. NPA is essentially 'comment on the content, not the editor', and CRRays90 did not do so, and is in breach of NPA. As for the discussion...
Click to read more »this at all, but wouldn't most, if not all of this already fall under WP:NPA? -DJSasso (talk) 18:25, 13 September 2010 (UTC) I think not- this is focused...
Click to read more »us reason together. 12:47, 23 August 2008 (UTC) The proposed page notes NPA and AGF. I think we should leave it at that and reject this proposal. To...
Click to read more »13:13, 26 May 2009 (UTC) And you say we can't handle such situations with WP:NPA? --Eptalon (talk) 13:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC) Not at all; just that we need...
Click to read more »them in weeks and I have no idea who they are. This could be considered WP:NPA, I have not done anything wrong and have done much to grow our Wikipedia...
Click to read more »violated numerous polices that administrators must know, including WP:NPOV, WP:NPA, WP:CIVIL, en:WP:WHEEL, and has violated the Wikipedia:Deletion policy and...
Click to read more »warnings and the block he got as his sockpuppet Edge37 and the vandalism and NPA warnings he got as the sock Hin111? Nope, other than those, none were given...
Click to read more »always involve issues of WP:V, WP:RS and WP:OWN; very few boil down to WP:NPA or WP:AGF. I'd recommend that something along these lines be tried here,...
Click to read more »Jimbo. Jonas D. Rand T 15:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC) Jonas I am warning you. NPA. I am the second person now to warn you about comments on other editors on...
Click to read more »violated clauses such as en:WP:Harassment#Threats, WP:AGF, WP:Civility, and WP:NPA. It's not a user warning; it's a threat. If you continue to pursue this course...
Click to read more »with who is making this suggestion than what it is about. Kindly review WP:NPA? EhJJTALK 21:19, 27 September 2009 (UTC) Honest answer, both. It's a user...
Click to read more »December 2008 (UTC) To Jonas D. Rand - I regard your comments as breaching WP:NPA - that is they are personal attacks commenting on me rather than the topic...
Click to read more »Majorly's entitled to say what he wants as long as it doesn't violate WP:NPA. Although, I think that Djsasso's comment was a little out of line. let's...
Click to read more »I've added the "Did you know" section on the Main Page, along with the first batch of DYKs. Thank you to all who helped accomplish this! I'll be around...
Click to read more »perfectly valid while mine is "crying wolf"? Because you get a carteblanche to NPA? Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 01:51, 7 October 2011 (UTC) Because it is crying wolf...
Click to read more »accusations in a public setting like this especially, regardless of your views (WP:NPA). I won't comment on that further. Are you alluding to the idea that admin's...
Click to read more »changes" or "errors introduced". Those mild insults don't really violate WP:NPA, but such wording leaves a scarring record of insults, toward you, in each...
Click to read more »Bluegoblin7 (talk · contribs) is completely inacceptable. Violation of WP:OWN and WP:NPA. I request a block for him by an uninvolved admin. He as a former admin should...
Click to read more »it's simply his way of solving problems (which others see as violating WP:NPA) which needs to be fixed rather than a block. Basically, unconstructive PA...
Click to read more »refuses to relent and continues their behaviour, block per WP:3RR or WP:NPA, whichever comes first. Chenzw Talk 03:09, 18 July 2013 (UTC) Thanks. I...
Click to read more »Ravensfire (talk) 17:02, 6 March 2025 (UTC) How about you follow that WP:NPA and strike your personal attack against me, Davey2010? I'm an editor just...
Click to read more »the account follows here. I have warned CRRays that he is in breach of WP:NPA even though it is off-wiki, per the rules. An admin may wish to take further...
Click to read more »discussions do take place sometimes on project-wide discussion pages (ST). WP:NPA should be able to cover that, though. Chenzw Talk 04:01, 13 June 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »potential problems whatsoever. Also, watch your tone...it's flirting with AGF/NPA Purplebackpack89 Continually, ie more than once. Most people would stop asking...
Click to read more »have supsicions that this user is editing under a IP adress to violate WP:NPA. The IP, when WhoIsed, comes up as a South Australian IP adress, which lines...
Click to read more »Oppose - I'm sorry but the attacks and your slogan "I don't care about WP:NPA" is not how an admin should be. These examples have made me come to a decision...
Click to read more »is not an "attack spot", it shows the hypocrisy that goes on here, when NPA is thrown around, but some people who make ad hominems are not even warned...
Click to read more »this site who should have the mop but everyone is too chicken of them! (No NPA breach intended) -- Da Punk '08 talk 08:57, 16 August 2008 (UTC) Weak...
Click to read more »was done can be reverted. The very first thing that comes to mind is WP:NPA. Everything was taken into consideration based on the information available...
Click to read more »no difference whether the talk page is there or not. Also, please read WP:NPA. Hockeycatcat (talk) (changes) 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Well yeah of course...
Click to read more »was done can be reverted. The very first thing that comes to mind is WP:NPA. Everything was taken into consideration based on the information available...
Click to read more »Lastly, I was never being a "dick" (though this counts as a warning for WP:NPA) I like to bring positively wherever I go (weather or not it is needed)....
Click to read more »sterilization of Native American women are crossing the line into WP:HOUNDING and WP:NPA. Specifically, [5], [6] and [7]feels more like hounding than a good faith...
Click to read more »disagree about policies, including extremely important policies like BLP and NPA, without resorting to incivility and personal attacks of our own. Please...
Click to read more »have supsicions that this user is editing under a IP adress to violate WP:NPA. The IP, when WhoIsed, comes up as a South Australian IP adress, which lines...
Click to read more »25 December 2023 (UTC) We need some basic respect for WP:RS, WP:DC, WP:NPA, WP:IMAGE, WP:OR from Gotanda on multiple articles. This has become a basic...
Click to read more »Kojak Savalas (talk) 22:24, 23 August 2023 (UTC) Kojak, you are breaking NPA more than they are. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC) @QuicoleJR...
Click to read more »particular users as antisemites, even if names are obscured. This raises WP:NPA concerns. I don't know the history at English Wikipedia that led to the block...
Click to read more »"caste-based warrior-like activity" without evidence is a violation of WP:NPA (No Personal Attacks). Claiming sockpuppetry without filing a proper WP:SPI...
Click to read more »not call people fascists. That is a very quick way to get blocked. Read WP:NPA. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:53, 27 November 2023 (UTC) This is very easily provable:...
Click to read more »