Redirect to:
statements generally should not rely on unclear or inconsistent passages nor on passing comments. Passages open to multiple interpretations should be...
Click to read more »paste it onto a Wiki text page), the list of pages listed in a category, nor the contents of non-transcludeable special pages. Transcluded Wikipedia headers...
Click to read more »it does not break any of our policies (especially Neutral point of view) nor the laws of the state of Florida in the United States, where Wikipedia is...
Click to read more »'widely known' for a product known as a Tazer. Article has neither categories, nor sources. Propose deletion Eptalon (talk) 22:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »these hooks are displayed on the main page. We don't want them to be bad, nor do we want to find any misinformation in the articles they promote. A little...
Click to read more »encyclopedia is not primary source material. Its authors do not conduct interviews nor perform original research. Hence, anything we include should have been covered...
Click to read more »used. No contributor, system operator, developer, or sponsor of Wikipedia, nor anyone else connected to Wikipedia can take any responsibility for the results...
Click to read more »core articles. This does not infer automatic deletion of non-core articles, nor the ostracism of the users that create them. It only means that our focus...
Click to read more »to make an encyclopedia, not see if anarchy can work. Neither fan pages, nor critical pans. Life stories and articles about artworks are supposed to be...
Click to read more »You should never create links from a mainspace article to any user page, nor should a userspace essay be used as the main source for any Wikipedia policy...
Click to read more »that the victim had a large role within a well-documented historic event, nor has historic significance been shown. Chenzw Talk 16:33, 22 December 2020...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete, nor to which article it could be merged. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:13, 26 July 2025...
Click to read more »which begets a responsibility to myself. I don't mention this in jest, nor in any sort of attention seeking. I mention it for elucidation to the rest...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:38, 24 May 2013 (UTC) It is a template, neither A1 nor a2 (nor anything under articles) applies. Under the current list of rules, there...
Click to read more »to satisfy Wikipedia:Notability (science) as his works are not mentioned nor referenced by any industry/wider media. Infogapp1 (talk) 12:33, 29 June 2020...
Click to read more »merely needs to have improved on yesterday. Perfection is neither desired nor achievable. Above all, creating an article which is unfinished is the second...
Click to read more »person. Unable to locate any decent third party coverage about this single nor the singer. Infogapp1 (talk) 13:15, 27 June 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »his clothing company. Couldn't find much external coverage of the subject nor his company. Infogapp1 (talk) 11:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »me. The refrences are neither significant, beyond mere passing mention, nor reliable. Elsewhere I can't find any significant coverage independent from...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete - Sources do not indicate notability, nor could I find significant coverage in reliable sources. Griff (talk) 00:59...
Click to read more »and why? I'm not pleased or unhappy about my work. I don't want any awards nor do I want my work scrutinised. Have you been in any conflicts over editing...
Click to read more »Delete - Fails ENT. Has not had significant roles in multiple notable films nor do they have significant coverage in reliable sources. I believe this is...
Click to read more »as merging. Delete - I don't see any credible indication of notability, nor any significant coverage. Doesn't pass WP:NBOOK. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page...
Click to read more »Unless otherwise stated Wikipedia and Wikimedia sites are neither endorsed nor affiliated with any of the holders of any such rights and as such Wikipedia...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to meet WP:ENT nor GNG. Chenzw Talk 10:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Doesn't have any sources, nor does it make any significant claim. BRP ever 02:08, 15 February 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to meet NORG nor en:WP:NONPROFIT. The only significant coverage I could find is a reproduced...
Click to read more »this one does not match the same requirements our existing articles have, nor does it meet our notability and reliable sourcing policies. Griff (talk)...
Click to read more »software currently has no method of detecting disambiguation pages, however; nor does it disregard stubs (but in any case, many articles tagged as stubs are...
Click to read more »Eptalon. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:54, 13 May 2018 (UTC) Neither lacking notability, nor NPOV. See en:Marriage in Islam (thats where the term redirects to at EnWP)...
Click to read more »coverage appears to be neither independent (e.g. they are interviews of him) nor significant (collection of biographical data). — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page...
Click to read more »case, we are neither talkink about a geographical feature, populated place, nor the name of a person, in the original language of the place they live. People...
Click to read more »their instagram and facebook has authentication symbol - thanks! AdrianaNor (talk) 08:06, 31 March 2022 (UTC) I have doubts that the publications are...
Click to read more »basically original research. Most of those advocating merge gave no rationale, nor did they comment on the lack of sourcing. Osiris (talk) 00:28, 25 July 2013...
Click to read more »really need is the definition. It's neither independently notable enough nor is it really needed as a separate article. Osiris (talk) 08:28, 6 October...
Click to read more »can't see any grounds for notability. The sources given are not independent, nor are they proper for our assessment purposes. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:16...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Non-notable. Neither sources included in the article nor other sources I've checked prove notability. In addition, the article has...
Click to read more »cited sources do not appear to provide significant coverage of the subject, nor do they appear to be independent. Chenzw Talk 09:02, 15 February 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC) Delete per nom. not deep coverage nor general notability. --77.1.35.78 (talk) 14:18, 19 November 2021 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »others. Users should not remove only portions of another user's comment, nor edit their comment in any other way. This includes paraphrasing, or correcting...
Click to read more »necessarily definitive, has neither a movie that matches this name/description nor an actor named Barry Boyce. It has an actor named Logan Moreau, but his entry...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete not reliable nor notable, and as you mentioned, there's barely any coverage on the award....
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Unremarkable musician, does not appear to meet GNG nor MUSICBIO. Chenzw Talk 04:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »Does not appear notable; single noted award doesn’t establish notability nor do the sources CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:01, 11 December 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't meet GNG nor the specific track & field criteria spelled out at en:WP:NTRACK. CountryANDWestern...
Click to read more »January 2009 (UTC) That's irrelevant; Peterdownunder isn't Majorly, nor Synergy, nor Gwib. Juliancolton (talk) 23:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC) Ugh...you asked...
Click to read more »Delete+SALT enough is enough, non notable. Nothing to do with Putin nor Trump nor any elections. --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:25, 12 January 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »neologisms nor dictionary entries. Just because it's trending today (one may take a look at the google trends graph) doesn't mean it's notable, nor that it...
Click to read more »judgmental terms — this is accusatory and discouraging. It is not helpful, nor reason to delete an article. Assuming good faith, start from the idea that...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete - None of the sources provided are reliable, nor do they show notability. The article as written also does not meet the standards...
Click to read more »Admittedly, this has also been my greatest concern. However, neither DJSasso nor I (nor any other user below) has considered this sufficiently worrisome to request...
Click to read more »sourced. There is no mention of a "20th National Consultative Assembly" nor is there a mention of a "General of the Iranian Army in the Assembly" in...
Click to read more »works even as a disambig: it doesn't connect to anything. And neither Simple nor wikt has a page for "plank", which is surely a prerequisite. Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »4 June 2013 (UTC) Delete: No significant coverage in reliable sources, nor is there is a corresponding English Wikipedia article. Lugia2453 (talk) 23:55...
Click to read more »Article is very very short to the point where there's no actual valuable nor helpful information included. –Davey2010Talk 20:20, 23 September 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »17 May 2020 (UTC) Delete - No reputable coverage about the individual nor the programming language. --Infogapp1 (talk) 16:38, 17 May 2020 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »I've removed all the content that made broad claims without any source, nor could I source any of the content. I realized after doing another check that...
Click to read more »that 'a youtube channel' was created does not establish further notability, nor does it add to any significant information in the article, most, if not all...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete - enWP certainly doesn't think a list is necessary nor does this programme lend itself to easily creating a cited future list. With...
Click to read more »Delete per Ferien. I also could not find any significant coverage of him, nor anything indicating that he was in a notable role in making movies. Griff...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Heavy POV pushing, it neither cites neutral sources nor neutral views, the entire conclusion of the article is based on what Pakistani...
Click to read more »discretion of an administrator. DELETE no references to this company at all, nor any indication that it's notable. Wekeepwhatwekill 00:23, 15 May 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Mozart. But notability is not inherited and there is nothing in the article nor online that indicates he is notable on his own. --Ferien (talk | join TBA...
Click to read more »find Japanese politicians: Note that Japan was/is neither part of NATO, nor of the Warzaw pact. Same argument: Finnish politicians; Finland was/is not...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. As it stands, a clear delete, neither claiming nor proving notability. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:23, 28 August 2014 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable, nor does it make much sense. IWI (chat) 18:33, 26 May 2020 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete Not notable, no significant coverage, nor anything that would verify that he is one of the "biggest content creators"...
Click to read more »probably Odia-language articles that show this, but as I don't know Odia nor are those sources presented. Griff (talk) 07:27, 30 March 2022 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: I find that the subject is neither referenced nor notable enough to merit inclusion in this Wikipedia. Additionally I find...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. DELETE there are absolutely no sources nor any indication that he's notable. Wekeepwhatwekill 00:21, 15 May 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete not useful nor needed. Someones pet project that has been long neglected. Pure Evil (talk)...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Seems to be a hoax. Sources don't mention this, nor does google or the photo. MrMeAndMrMeTalk 00:30, 14 October 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »it will be discussed for seven days. If neither a satisfying explanation nor appropriate sources can be found for a standalone article, but the person...
Click to read more »This one however has no sources and looking around no article cites this, nor does anyone use the symbol. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 14:28, 1 May 2026...
Click to read more »notability guideline as they have not held any significant political office nor are they particularly notable in any other way. Griff (talk) 02:47, 28 December...
Click to read more »subject of the article does not meet our notability standards for musicians nor do they claim to do so. The one reference given does not reference the musician...
Click to read more »January 2022 (UTC) Delete The company he created isn't even mentioned on enWP nor does it show notability. Griff (talk) 23:58, 28 January 2022 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »Unscathedsacrifice (talk • contribs) None of these are reliable sources, nor do they show notability. IWI (chat) 17:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC) Since when is...
Click to read more »is that the sources here are very iffy. And if neither English Wikipedia nor French Wikipedia kept the page—both deleted it—it doesn't pass the notability...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete No signs of WP:N nor are any of the sources reliable sources. A cursory search for the person...
Click to read more »coverage and not all are reliable sources. Nothing remarkable about the person nor his company. Fails notablity/BIO.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:34, 11 April...
Click to read more »"Too soon" but it does not work for deceased People as they can't improve nor make anything anymore. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 12:29, 12 November 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Not notable. hasnt played for anyone of note nor done anything of note --Creol(talk) 07:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »consideration, I deleted this article, because it was neither in simple language, nor unbiased. Recreting with language that is both sipmle and unbiased (with...
Click to read more »show notability. A soldier participating in many battles is not notable nor is an unexplained and undocumented heroic act. Rus793 (talk) 14:43, 2 August...
Click to read more »"(W)holesome Products" but did not find significant coverage in reliable sources, nor did I find any evidence (outside their own website and various wikis) that...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - meets neither BASIC nor NACTOR. Chenzw Talk 11:28, 3 September 2020 (UTC) Delete - per above. --Yottie...
Click to read more »Notability not shown through reliable sources. "Award" doesn't seem notable, nor do his positions or achievements. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:30, 4 September...
Click to read more »resolution of local conflicts. It's not true. Neither WMF board nor developers nor stewards nor meta sysops can solve such disputes. Take this to your local...
Click to read more »"Pakistani victory" Heavy POV pushing, it neither cites neutral sources nor neutral views, the entire conclusion of the article is based on what Pakistani...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: A redirect to a taxon which is neither an ancestor nor a descendant - see en:Holotheria Animal lover 666 (talk) 11:30, 25 July 2021...
Click to read more »2024 (UTC) Delete - Reddit doesn't seem to like the show very much, and nor did anyone else, because there aren't any sources or significant coverage...
Click to read more »chances of notability of this page, not elected to any position in assembly nor any significant coverage, it was also previously deleted on En Wiki by me...
Click to read more »its players have played at the first-class standard, and so neither they nor the team meets GNG. Jack (talk) 20:53, 28 June 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »sources referenced in the article did not include a reference to this company, nor did I find SIGCOV for this company anywhere else. Griff (talk) 02:05, 26...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete There are zero references to prove any claims, nor is there anything to prove that we should care about the claims. Blissyu2...
Click to read more »indicator of a user's trustworthiness where Adminship/sysop status is concerned, nor is it a good indicator of the value and quality of their contributions. Thank...
Click to read more »en:WP:NFOOTBALL because he played in J. League Division 1. Neither en:WP:NFOOTBALL nor en:WP:BLPNOTE trump each other: either can be used to show notability. --Auntof6...
Click to read more »en:WP:NFOOTBALL because he played in J. League Division 1. Neither en:WP:NFOOTBALL nor en:WP:BLPNOTE trump each other: either can be used to show notability. --Auntof6...
Click to read more »Meets en:WP:NFOOTBALL because he played in Ligue 1. Neither en:WP:NFOOTBALL nor en:WP:BLPNOTE trump each other: either can be used to show notability. --Auntof6...
Click to read more »en:WP:NFOOTBALL because he played in J. League Division 1. Neither en:WP:NFOOTBALL nor en:WP:BLPNOTE trump each other: either can be used to show notability. --Auntof6...
Click to read more »coverage. None of Chile's players take part in first-class cricket matches, and nor are they likely to. Therefore, the article fails GNG. Thanks. Jack (talk)...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC) He wasn't banned at en for his editing, nor his importing skills. He was banned for alleged behavioral issues, which...
Click to read more »as evidence of notability, and being in fashion magazines is neither here nor there. It needs to be independent evidence from qualified judges. Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »--Auntof6 (talk) 02:21, 13 June 2013 (UTC) Delete: No indication of notability, nor is there a corresponding English Wikipedia article. Lugia2453 (talk) 02:05...
Click to read more »notability. I don't see why this was not QD'd: not even a claim of notability, nor the slightest evidence. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Delete – There are no reliable sources that appear when you search the name, nor anything that really explains the details in the article well. InfernoGaming46...
Click to read more »18:57, 19 June 2013 (UTC) Delete: Fancruft. No indication of notability, nor is there a corresponding English Wikipedia article. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:24...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Sammy Houston is not his actual name nor is it one of his names. It is a variation of his name, but that is all MrMeAndMrMeLet's...
Click to read more »Looks like an autobiography. Can't find any reliable sources for this guy, nor for his "Movement and Action for Social Services". The impression I get from...
Click to read more »this at EnWP. My crystal ball is broken, but since we neither get a story, nor (obviously) critical reception figures, and because my crystal ball is undergoing...
Click to read more »usually have articles for individual surnames such as Lee, Wang, William nor Smith. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and this should be transwikied to Wiktionary...
Click to read more »Not notable, coverage in references don't present him in a neutral manner, nor are they significant. Refs 1, 2, 4 appear to be identical to one another...
Click to read more »en:WP:NFOOTBALL because he played in J. League Division 1. Neither en:WP:NFOOTBALL nor en:WP:BLPNOTE trump each other: either can be used to show notability. --Auntof6...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete. The link is to J Nored's own website (© 2011 Created by James Nored) with links to Amazon for Missional booklets for sale...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Don't believe this subject, nor his charity, have yet reached the level of notability we would expect on...
Click to read more »Being mayor 4 consecutive terms doesn’t make him notable outside of his town nor does being 27. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:50, 25 June 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »deletion: en:Osmium Blacksmiths. There has been no attempt at simplification nor any attempt to add references which support the band's notability. All references...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - meets neither GNG nor ENT. Chenzw Talk 13:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC) Delete- roles in shows aren't...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) Merge into Dvin. It does not meet the requirements of EVENT, nor does it have enough information to be in its own article. The wikidata item...
Click to read more »This is a perfectly good term in animal anatomy but is not in English wiki, nor even in English wiktionary (!). What I've done is expand our entry in wikt...
Click to read more »and besides that, the article does not describe much of anything else, nor put forward any claims of notability. QD A4 applies. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk...
Click to read more »also misleading. We don't call the pipa, liuqin, ruan "Chinese guitars", nor do we call the lute, baroque guitar, and the mandolin "European guitars"...
Click to read more »"pathetic" that RF failed. This is not the kind of behavior or attitude I expect, nor do I want to see, from a bureaucrat trusted in deciding consensus in an RFA...
Click to read more »does not make him notable and have an article on Wikipedia. No Wikidata nor English Wikipedia article, and even the organisation the subject was apparently...
Click to read more »the city level (they are Category:History by city but not establishments nor disestablishments. It seems too granular. Adding the subcategories as well...
Click to read more »(Faculty of Economics where the subject got hit PhD) but he is not a PhD nor of the listed age range. Pure Evil (talk) 01:25, 18 November 2022 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »October 2005 (UTC) While I don't think this is going to change your opinion (nor do I expect it to,) I'd like to point out that my edit count is higher than...
Click to read more »The French version is pretty similar to our article; I know neither Hindi nor Nepali, so I cannot judge these versions. So I am putting it up for deletion...
Click to read more »The article doesn't demonstrate significant coverage in reliable sources, nor does it seem to meet any other notability criteria. BRP ever 09:15, 13 February...
Click to read more »but there's really nothing in this article to build any content around, nor is there anything we could include in the future. This is at most a list...
Click to read more »its author notable. I note the points made in the book are not original, nor does it break new ground. The reviews are not clear on the issue of his notability...
Click to read more »January 2010 (UTC) FWIW, NU has not contacted me about my offer of mentoring, nor has he edited his userpage since the block. So that's one less editor. The...
Click to read more »when you opened the discussion (which we could overlook as an accident) nor here in the discussion section. You must give a reason, or the RFD may be...
Click to read more »reason: Fails WP:GNG and slightly promotional; the sources do not make sense nor relate to the actual article. RiggedMint 03:27, 21 May 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »of users required to accomplish this. We are not a place for statistics, nor are we a database to store information which is not useful for a reader....
Click to read more »no reason for us to be locally notifying IP addresses of global blocks, nor is it practical for us to be monitoring global blocks and notifying IPs locally...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not used anywhere, neither here nor on the English Wikipedia. Osiris (talk) 09:41, 2 December 2013 (UTC) Note...
Click to read more »the start. I don't feel that the elections are being conducted "fairly", nor in check with other elections that we have held (we've got 25 votes for CU...
Click to read more »10:11, 7 September 2020 (UTC) Delete No substantial claims to notability nor any third party reliable sources proclaiming the subject's relevance --Infogapp1...
Click to read more »19:31, 22 July 2020 (UTC) Delete - Per nom. Not enough reliable sourcing nor information to establish notability. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 10:27, 23...
Click to read more »userspace or not we should never have articles created by prolific socks nor should we have hoax articles. –Davey2010Talk 14:13, 12 December 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »individual modules the ESA is working on it. There is no European Space Station, nor does the ESA have any plan to make a space station. It's a topic that simply...
Click to read more »reliable sources and fails GNG. She hasn't done anything particularly notable, nor is there proof of such. Griff (talk) 08:05, 10 March 2022 (UTC) Delete not...
Click to read more »Hockeycatcat (talk) 02:52, 5 July 2022 (UTC) Delete Same - We are not an atlas nor do we store information about roads because of where they end, start, go...
Click to read more »category should have been removed by the creator. It's really neither here nor there in cases as clear cut as this though. I'd be more worried about that...
Click to read more »with trying to define what a dictator is, but we have had no such problem (nor have the 32 other language wikis with dictator categories). We have categories...
Click to read more »and 2. It's a how-to-do-it page. We're not equipped to teach languages, nor is it our remit. Macdonald-ross (talk) 20:57, 13 August 2012 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »reason: I could not find such artist in the web or books, neither in Russian nor in English. Possibly a WP:HOAX. Brandmeister (talk) 08:24, 4 March 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Shariros, I'm sorry and don't mean ANY offense by this but you don't know me nor my history on enWP.-- ✧ ChristianMan16 19:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC) CM16...
Click to read more »There's an article at EnWP (), but in my book, neither the aricle at EnWP, nor the one we have gives a clue why this person is notable. Professionals doing...
Click to read more »for the reason: Event does not seem likely to receive in-depth coverage nor provide lasting significance; cited sources border dangerously on sensational...
Click to read more »en:WP:NFOOTBALL because he played in J. League Division 1. Neither en:WP:NFOOTBALL nor en:WP:BLPNOTE trump each other: either can be used to show notability. --Auntof6...
Click to read more »count, and while that's probably factually true, it's neither an accurate nor a neutral statement. StevenJ81 (talk) 17:37, 23 May 2017 (UTC) Thanks for...
Click to read more »realize that their attacks are neither amusing, nor frustrating (just ho-hum reactions are the norm), nor original. Someone else did the same thing (and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Notability (music). Those in favor of deletion have not addressed that point, nor was there an argument provided for the subject not meeting the notability...
Click to read more »there is any ever reason that it should, and btw there isn't at the moment, nor should there be, I will resign the flag until another time. As for the sockpuppetery...
Click to read more »have any articles :p DefenseSupportParty (talk) 06:15, 19 March 2009 (UTC) Nor would there be any peer reviews. After all, if the article ain't broke, don't...
Click to read more »In some cases, the entries in the body aren't linked at all, neither red nor blue. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:11, 22 September 2022 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »neologism that falls under WP:NEO. I haven't heard this term being used nor have I found significant uses of it (maybe my math circle is just too small...
Click to read more »ToadetteEdit (talk) 17:35, 11 July 2024 (UTC) Delete subject clearly not notable nor meets Wikipedia:Notability. as the old saying goes: Delete i have a saying;...
Click to read more »11:40, 8 March 2025 (UTC) Delete It neither falls under Article category nor encyclopedic.--Pot 10:52, 9 March 2025 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »Therefore anyone who says he isnt notable clearly isnt a South African nor do they understand just what this young man has done. Thus this must not...
Click to read more »irrelevant or are not in-depth enough (routine coverage). Neither the singer nor the song are notable. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 10:43, 26 February 2024...
Click to read more »remaining source, that source nowhere calls this event as "Battle of batapur" nor the source specifically talks about an "X victory" or "Y victory" taking...
Click to read more »to get to a level that is generally acceptable but that is neither here nor there. Pure Evil (talk) 21:43, 25 February 2023 (UTC) He was a ruler, like...
Click to read more »ceo (talk) 12:55, 2 June 2025 (UTC) Delete per nom. Neither references 1 nor 2 actually make reference to the subject. Reference 1 has no mention, and...
Click to read more »Kurdish people under Category:Kurdish people – so that's not really relevant. Nor is self-identity; as was said in the discussion, that's best left to the...
Click to read more »meant to be an encyclopaedia, not a surreal version of Facebook or Myspace, nor a place for banned EN users to fester Soup Dish (talk) 17:14, 29 March 2009...
Click to read more »feature adverts. I personally don't see anything innovative, revolutionary, nor notable in the company in itself. Copy in its current form looks more promotional...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete, lack of notability, no sources nor references. There also seems to be a conflict of interest: "His choice of...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete - subject does not appear to meet GNG nor AUTHOR. Most of the sources in the article do not contain significant coverage...
Click to read more »Microsoft's website doesn't list him as one of their MVPs on that project's site, nor has it ever issued any statement listing him as one of '100 ethical hackers'...
Click to read more »is no reason to pick any out as especially characteristic of Bangladesh. Nor would any sane government do so. Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:15, 1 July 2021...
Click to read more »Only Article space (not even Article talk space), nor Wikipedia/WP:Talk, nor Template:/Template talk:, nor obviously User:/User talk: Lets say only the top...
Click to read more »Maybe. But still is clear to fail GNG, and the core content policy, WP:NOR because maybe the author of the article used a purchased book for sources...
Click to read more »seriously I have done more stuff than this and I don't get a Wikipedia page (nor does it even get considered) so why does she get one? Blissyu2 (talk) 00:43...
Click to read more »personal website doesn't provide any help in finding reliable sources, and nor does a news search. I'm a little rusty at this, but I'd recommend a deletion...
Click to read more »should. While I don't believe he would misuse the flag, he neither needs it nor does the wiki itself need more crats. Since neither needs the other and I...
Click to read more »been spent, and not all issues have been addressed. Therefore neither GA nor VGA-Eptalon (talk) 13:17, 30 December 2022 (UTC) And my answer to that editor...
Click to read more »going on experience, I don't believe that this change would be useful, and nor do they. Best to keep things as they already are without a doubt. Secondly...
Click to read more »are also places where a person can be legally recognized as neither male nor female. Lights and freedom (talk) 17:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC) Keep Needs improving...
Click to read more »issues with pages. The label of "completely useless" is usually neither true nor helpful. If a page is actually completely useless, it should just be brought...
Click to read more »Volkswagen Passat. These stubs do not have significant coverage for expansion nor do I expect them to gain any. Goodvac (talk) 06:57, 10 March 2011 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »election. it does not actually talk about the scope of the topic in detail nor analyze its party leadership structures. so for its redundancy it needs to...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Heavy POV pushing, it neither cites neutral sources nor neutral views, the entire conclusion of the article is based on what Pakistani...
Click to read more »way it is asserted in the article, can not be proved. Notability is not, nor could it ever be established for the facts presented. NonvocalScream (talk)...
Click to read more »pages. I have not found any sources proving the existence of this state, nor of the rulers on this list. Granted, I only looked on Google and not in any...
Click to read more »English Wikipedia. I notice the missing sections are not on the Georgian nor Vietnamese language templates either. Theirs just have the plain 'navbox'...
Click to read more »January, policeman, property, government. Missing are robbery (neither it nor rob are in simple wiktionary either but we do have an article on it at robbery...
Click to read more »won't know this, nor should they ideally need to do it. fr33kman talk 20:35, 13 July 2009 (UTC) reset It's hardly hacking the system. Nor does it take much...
Click to read more »Angerxiety 13:25, 21 December 2022 (UTC) Delete no hint of notability nor claim of it. Should have been quick deleted. Pure Evil (talk) 14:46, 21 December...
Click to read more »new, news, newspaper, next, nice, night, nine, no, noble, noise, none, nor, north, nose, not, nothing, notice, now, number obey, object, ocean, of,...
Click to read more »important news? Ahmadtalk 08:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC) We don't need crats, nor IA or coders to implement accounts only page creation, enwp model can be...
Click to read more »which have attracted most criticism, nor about the extensive literature on how the bible was put together, nor about the philosophical limitations of...
Click to read more »should vote. I think we should not allow users who are no longer active here, nor users who are not active here at all to vote; they are free to comment, but...
Click to read more »EverybodyWiki article it seems, and EverybodyWiki has no guidelines on verifiability nor credibility. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 05:36, 6 March 2022 (UTC) Correction:...
Click to read more »references provided are social media sites; they are neither independent, nor do they provide reliable sources. In short: we are talking about someone...
Click to read more »appears to read as a CV - cited sources do not appear to be independent nor provide significant coverage of the subject. Chenzw Talk 10:14, 30 October...
Click to read more »articles (and images) that are not appropriate. They may not exist here, nor may anybody have tried to create them. They do exist on English wikipedia...
Click to read more »eligible provided that the hook is referenced and the articles are not stubs nor VGA's, and have not been on the Main Page in the past for VGA. (Articles...
Click to read more »Primarily, I don't have to watch my G6s sitting in the QD cat for hours, nor do I have to patrol new pages without actually being able to click patrolled...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep - I’m going to vote Keep for now, though it’s not yet notability nor any ANYBIO or NM, but it would give it a go. — Preceding unsigned comment...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete as obvious hoax (or nn fan video). Neither Google nor IMDB knows about this. The odd cast of characters (Grinch, Mario, Stewie...
Click to read more »tools and no indication of understanding even the basics of the language nor any indication of policy or procedures. The user has one open RfD which at...
Click to read more »following the changes (not made as the result of a discussion mind you, nor coming from a location I can confirm (height of invention? where does this...
Click to read more »March 2023 (UTC) Yeah, VERIFIABILITY is one of the third content policy. NOR can tie into it and may also be used in this article. Thanks, WPchanger2011...
Click to read more »(talk) 23:53, 19 February 2026 (UTC) Personal attacks are neither appreciated nor helpful. This person is primarily covered in sources for the manner of his...
Click to read more »didn't create organizational typology - that was created by Ron Westrum. Nor did he create the concept of the corporate culture power pyramid - that was...
Click to read more »opposition, then an RfB should be triggered. This way, it is not seen as a reward nor a right, but merely as simplifying and speeding up process. Thoughts? Goblin...
Click to read more »Purplebackpack89 (talk · contribs) does not appreciate the ban that was put into place, nor has any remorse for that user's previous actions. As a result the community...
Click to read more »as he may be, I believe that Griffin possess neither the amount of clue nor the mentality to effectively administrate. His blind adherence to written...
Click to read more »quite offensive, as my previous tools never showed any such actions and nor would I do such a thing, as it would be a gross misusage of tools and go...
Click to read more »to announce, that neither Tangotango, nor Geeksluvpi have been using any sockpuppets on the Simple Wikipedia, nor are they sockpuppets of themselves. And...
Click to read more »question: Is there anybody here who knows for certain that neither stress nor addictive potential can do any harm to Inkpen2? If he knows then he should...
Click to read more »corresponding wikidata but at the right where it is linked simple was not there nor would it let me add it. This particular data had a lot of information compared...
Click to read more »no do you worship what I worship. I shall never worship what you worship, nor will you ever worship what I worship. You have your own religion and I have...
Click to read more »negligent in regards to substandard construction, which there is no evidence nor implication that she is in no way guilty of this) Pure Evil (talk) 17:45...
Click to read more »information to merge, I would recommend that, but this is not a useful redirect nor is there any information to merge. Griff (talk) 01:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »written a few other things is not a sufficient explanation of notability, nor is it particularly significant, though it is credible. WP:A4. However, I...
Click to read more »sign! ←Kalajan→ 14:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC) An essay isn't a policy. Nor should this be a policy. Thirdly you can't just copy and paste something...
Click to read more »Lauryn Ashby (talk) 18:36, 19 July 2010 (UTC) That's hardly new to this Wiki, nor unique to English (I daresay that English WP's drama is far worse, and at...
Click to read more »views on HotCat (it is useful, but does not add to the encyclopedia, and nor does vandalism reversion), I was saying that he did not make many manual...
Click to read more »to move it and create a redirect at Holocaust just to have it reverted, nor relink a lot of links if no one cares or has a better idea. TransUtopian...
Click to read more »the project page, and then hope for the best? (Note: so far neither state nor slavery have drawn much attention, both are listed on the project page. Are...
Click to read more »but I don't see how I could reword it. That's not bland scientific fact, nor is it fiction though. And pictures: I'd like there (for the sake of my lil...
Click to read more »be nominated if they are near-good and have a high chance at promotion, nor have we said that you should be bringing them to this page to ask if they're...
Click to read more »is no "SNOW pass". I request that until this is resolved neither Majorly nor Barras use their Oversight tools and instead continue to request actions...
Click to read more »the saving, Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )? It certainly wasn't me, nor Auntof6. Nor do I believe it was Rus793. In fact, you continued to fight on my talk...
Click to read more »This would help for dealing with things that are called neither church nor cathedral but very similar (Mormon temples for instance) and would be a subcat...
Click to read more »it wasn't added to the RFP page. So, no, there was no reason to close it (nor to vote, either). Auntof6 (talk) 00:42, 2 October 2021 (UTC) The above adminship...
Click to read more »in an encyclopedia - particularly in ours. We are not a travel guide, and nor do we promote regular, minor edits that are simply adding or removing content...
Click to read more »seems to have remorse for his actions. Before you ask, no, I'm not him, nor was I recruited here by him. (also, he was about 15-16 when he started his...
Click to read more »to textual copyright violations on seWP, I don't see them being removed, nor do I see the lawyers banging down the doors. A copyright vio is the same...
Click to read more »it earlier today (yesterday indeed), Archer. Neither your edit history, nor that of MediaWiki:Sidebar show a relevant change. - Huji reply 05:32, 13...
Click to read more »given the chance. Admins aren't the only ones who can nominate for deletion nor are the only ones who patrol these pages...While they are the only one who...
Click to read more »how this has lasted in the mainspace for so long – it's not an article, nor is it really a list. It's an assortment of short biographical descriptions...
Click to read more »refocus on the mission :) I don't think the statement should be changed, nor do I think that people should be forbidden from focusing on whatever takes...
Click to read more »"quick delete".--TBCΦtalk? 23:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC) "QD" is not suitable nor intuitive. It can stand for anything, not just "quick delete". ...Aurora...
Click to read more »it. Every article space page in the wiki now has neither External links nor See also, unless they were created since I ran the bot ;). Regards, Goblin...
Click to read more »proportion. Scoring was never an issue as there was a bot that did that, nor was it left 'to a few sysops' - because I certainly wasn't one. With regards...
Click to read more »This template isn't able to function on this site. Neither Citation bot nor its owner are active on here, so editors will simply have to fill out the...
Click to read more »have is that I don't know anything about you. You've never voted on WP:RFD, nor voted here on other candidates. You also only rarely edit summaries for your...
Click to read more »Redirect to Bill Paxton. An "orphaned mess" does not warrant deletion, nor does the fact that an actor is "minor"; and which Paxton is which? :| TelCoNaSpVe :|...
Click to read more »off WP:ANYBIO she has not actually won the well-known significant award nor has she been nominated for it several times therefore fails that. --Ferien...
Click to read more »80's: [1] [2]. However there's no significant coverage of this company, nor proof that they worked on Grim Tales. I believe the article was "hijacked"...
Click to read more »en:WP:NFOOTBALL because he played in J. League Division 1. Neither en:WP:NFOOTBALL nor en:WP:BLPNOTE trump each other: either can be used to show notability. --Auntof6...
Click to read more »with or without links. Also pelase note that I currently have neither time nor skill to do this change.--Eptalon (talk) 11:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC) Changes...
Click to read more »to his own companies. An internet search search reveals nothing better. Nor do his companies pass the notability criteria for companies. "Makin Electronic"...
Click to read more »from EnWP. I do however have to say, that neither being poorly written, nor having no sources are grounds for deletion. This article exists in several...
Click to read more »respond. A block would not imply that the user is acting in bad faith, and nor would them editing under a new IP address. --IWI (talk) 12:26, 17 October...
Click to read more »on the Administrative backlog, neither Category:Quick deletion requests nor Category:Current requests for permissions appear despite clearly being in...
Click to read more »front page and so may not be up to standard, and I doubt we have the time nor manpower to go through every single one to get it up to scratch that would...
Click to read more »also, more importantly, I personally don't like being called a pornographer nor do the others I would imagine. This constitutes a personal attack, so I suggest...
Click to read more »articles are useless. I have not made any arguments based on anything but that. Nor are my arguments Reductio ad absurdum. They are all very valid issues. Retaining...
Click to read more »is that, more and more these days, people are identifying as neither male nor female: sometimes agendered, sometimes gender fluid, maybe others I'm not...
Click to read more »I did do something wrong, what was it? I don't know how to repair this, nor do I know how to find where the mistake exists. Before asking for help, what...
Click to read more »years ago, and rarely has words necessary in modern science & technology, nor modern idiomatic use of language. Simple sentence structure works wonders...
Click to read more »objectively, its neither a floating lake (that would break the law of physics) nor is it the only lake of its kind. There are many lakes with floating islands...
Click to read more »redirected to Shabbat back in '03. As Shabbat is not completely Sabbath, nor vice versa, the article would be better suited to be split into the two forms...
Click to read more »legitimate stub; there still are a few red-links, but neither being a stub, nor red-links are reason for deletion. The status of the editors who created/changed...
Click to read more »redlinked cats, maintenance or not, aren't important enough to delete for (nor are redlinked templates, by the way): if that's the biggest issue, then there...
Click to read more »the preview button before saving", but there isn't a preview button and nor is there a save option. Not too hard to guess that the "Show preview" button...
Click to read more »serious problem that we simply don't have sufficient interest in this process nor an adequate number of "named" editors contributing regularly to sustain the...
Click to read more »18 July 2023 (UTC) Speedy delete cross-wiki spam; refs are not reliable nor the person is notable; previously deleted on en wiki two times: https://en...
Click to read more »August 2010 (UTC) I'm sorry, Fr33kman, but as we have no REFDESK, HELPDESK, nor Village pump in sight, I feel that this is the only way to discuss anything...
Click to read more »scientist categories should be any different than any other occupation category, nor did you provide a reason why they would be different. To my point Vjekoslav...
Click to read more »This should not be viewed as a deletion all redirects created by Deppiyy, nor is it meant to be exclusive to redirects created by Deppiyy. Users wishing...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete Being a scientist does not not care about gender nor does it affect the line of work. MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 00:01, 18 May 2022...
Click to read more »a start). Griffinofwales (talk) 23:48, 19 May 2010 (UTC) Not really, and nor are Bible articles really the most wanted. Look at it this way: the articles...
Click to read more »out how to get it to work here either. Exert 01:02, 1 December 2010 (UTC) Nor I, although I tried. sonia♫ 05:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC) Try using...
Click to read more »To my knowledge, they do not take into account any grammatical structure, nor any semantic information. For this reason: Simply splitting sentences and...
Click to read more »get an accepted editor of this wikipedia. I know this is neither youtube nor facebook. This is about making an encyclopedia that is easy to understand...
Click to read more »collapsed doesn't mean it should be gone. It isn't harming you in any way, nor is it harming IP editors I am sure. And yes Jonas you comments towards majorly...
Click to read more »(UTC) I don't think the word "spoiler" is simple English - neither spoiler nor spoil appear in the Basic English combined wordlist - I cannot think it appropriate...
Click to read more »state nicknames, both of which have much clearer criteria. Neither the group nor most of these on their own are notable enough for an article. There isn't...
Click to read more »reliable evidence that this person is 1) an astrophysicist, 2) has a PhD, nor 3) works at NASA. At best, there are non-RS that suggest the subject works...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Seems to be notable, but it's not in NPOV nor is in an encyclopedic format. And it's also asking questions to you about...
Click to read more »season). I don't think anyone would spend the time creating those articles, nor do I see the use in them. Template is also unused. Albacore (talk · changes)...
Click to read more »extended and eventually set to the point that it is believed you have not now nor will in the foreseeable future have changed in a way warranting letting you...
Click to read more »the point of this Wikipedia having a Manual of Style while neither the PGA nor PVGA process even suggests editors look at it, leave alone try to comply...
Click to read more »reverted and category tagged for deletion, as two hours is not a discussion nor time for a consensus to be formed at all. Goblin 23:25, 15 May 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »and Markus Schulze will know exactly why he was blocked. It was not bitey, nor was it punitive in any way. Best. Synergy 18:24, 3 June 2009 (UTC) Per Synergy...
Click to read more »people are forced into creating stubs on things they may not be knowledgeable nor interested in. Deleting stubs for the sake of deletion will force a review...
Click to read more »is yet to be proven to the satisfaction of medical science. Note there is nor reason for inaccuracies at enwp to be reproduced here - we are not a mirror...
Click to read more »more or less notable than the Moshis. (I have never had a Moshi Monster nor ever will). Quick discussion on IRC suggested the following as some starting...
Click to read more »Yotcmdr is saying. In the short-term, writing short stubs is neither good nor bad, but in the long term, if we want to have a complete encyclopedia, articles...
Click to read more »how this has lasted in the mainspace for so long – it's not an article, nor is it really a list. It's an assortment of short biographical descriptions...
Click to read more »a YouTube series and that's cool but this is not related to Big Brother nor has anyone entered any house (apart from your own), As for where you can...
Click to read more »(I'm Not Okay!) 04:02, 9 February 2009 (UTC) I haven't watched the video. Nor do I intend to. I know how it works, and I don't really want to watch someone...
Click to read more »"Dr. Potter congratulates Yoanna Gouchtchina." and she isnt even in a gown nor is there any clue what she is congrat'd for. Even if the other refs are stellar...
Click to read more »these various templates (populating the various categories) were in use, nor do I know the background of using "page" vs. "article." To be clear, my intention...
Click to read more »creators. Fylbecatulous talk 21:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC) Single is neither jargon nor complicated. It's a well-understood, basic term. Jim Michael (talk) 22:58...
Click to read more »Hello all, I just added the four "missing" RfDs (which were neither closed, nor listed as "in progress") to our RfD page. Currently, I dpn't know the reason...
Click to read more »out? I don't want to sound like I'm trying to cause havoc to your plans, nor am I trying to be aggressive in response to your plans. Thanks. --Tsugaru...
Click to read more »sum given to the winners as a token of appreciation. It is neither given, nor received in the manner you just pointed out. I have won some contest in Nepali...
Click to read more »deleted. However, the page explicitly states that it is not a guideline nor policy, and I think it is important that we make this clear lest editors...
Click to read more »copyright requirements during upload itself. Presumably, you don't have interest nor energies to have hundreds templates with the now required HTML, even less...
Click to read more »there are cases where the page at the unqualified name is neither a dab page nor an article, but a redirect. In some cases it redirects to the dab page (which...
Click to read more »content editor were extremely damaging to us. He has never acknowleged this, nor promised to reform. I have explained before that no-one in the history of...
Click to read more »(UTC) That is a lie many times you have just deleted pages with no QD on it nor giving time for someone to respond to anything you post. You just mass delete...
Click to read more »Category:Pages with reference errors but im not seeing the cat on the page nor any ref error either. Right now things are being screwy so that could be...
Click to read more »Currently, I have built 4 IRC bots that serve various projects. I have not, nor plan to, request approval or on-wiki input for those bots as they do not...
Click to read more »sandbox does not appear to be on the regular English Wikipedia (EnWiki) nor does it appear in the Japanese Wikipedia either. Etamni | ✉ | ✓ 16:59, 13...
Click to read more »Not all of it is documentable. Meanwhile, I notice neither Berserkerus nor Jonas have provided "documented sources" such as the latter has demanded...
Click to read more »written with a neutral point of view. This means that it is neither "for" nor "against" any particular subject. You can include praise or criticism of...
Click to read more »TurboGolf 18:07, 21 January 2009 (UTC) We don't document individual songs nor does enwp except on special occasions.-- Chris†ianMan16 t c r 18:54, 20 January...
Click to read more »as any sort of leverage as it is merely a tool to help be a janitor here, nor will I use this tool for any usage except for vandalism, especially in cases...
Click to read more »expanding articles. That certainly isn't bad. But I hardly ever see you revert, nor do I see many user warning messages from you on IP talk pages. This worries...
Click to read more »as per above, The idiot who did this shouldn't be given the time of day nor should the sad facebook group, Nothing at all on Google, Get rid. –Davey2010Talk...
Click to read more »Delete per above - non-notable film. Added references aren't convincing, nor are verifiable. Hiàn (talk/editing on mobile account.) 17:20, 30 May 2018...
Click to read more »September 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG criteria, no English Wikipedia article, nor a Wikidata item as well as lack of reliable sources. SHB2000 (talk) 11:52...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) @Blissyu2: There is no "fifth of alcohol" article, neither here nor on English Wikipedia. -- Auntof6 (talk) 02:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »11:20, 1 March 2014 (UTC) Angela isn't trolling, being dishonest or fake, nor is she using emotional blackmail. Her mental disorders impair her judgement...
Click to read more »the same editor. The subject is a young performer with not much experience nor impact on either the Tunisian or international entertainment scene. For comparable...
Click to read more »17 September 2021 (UTC) Delete i can't say the subject is not notable nor Notable Enough, but to put it in simple terms: Too Soon to have an article...
Click to read more »Either way (talk) 18:46, 13 August 2010 (UTC) Weak delete neither the band nor the album seem 100% notable (the band didn't pass music notability on EN)...
Click to read more »are accurate. EhJJTALK 22:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC) I am not a psychologist, nor biologist, but I learnt about both Pavlov and Skinner at school. (Their resp...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Clearly an unhelpful redirect, nor a redirect to User (computing), thus delete, A user is a person interacting...
Click to read more »18 June 2019 (UTC) I will note that I am not a member of the T&S team, nor an employee of the WMF, although hopefully someone who is will review the...
Click to read more »about the Teletubbies on a wiki site if either had been around at the time. Nor would I keep coming back to a place I wasn't wanted. I take hints well. This...
Click to read more »en:WP:NFOOTBALL because he played in J. League Division 1. Neither en:WP:NFOOTBALL nor en:WP:BLPNOTE trump each other: either can be used to show notability. --Auntof6...
Click to read more »21:50, 17 February 2006 (UTC)) This is not a core encyclopedia article, nor is it referred to by any core article. En: has an article, and there's no...
Click to read more »(UTC) This is possibly unique content, not found in either Spanish nor Portugese, nor English WPs. Keep an eye on it -- Eptalon 21:41, 12 November 2006...
Click to read more »are other users here who go around saying God Bless, it's not an insult, nor is it in violation of NPOV, you are allowed opinions, just not within the...
Click to read more »It's certainly not notable to be a queer in the entertainment industry! Nor is it notable to write a film with characters who are sexually deviant. And...
Click to read more »I wish you'd consider changing your username as I can never remember it, nor am I able to type it. Majorly talk 19:48, 4 April 2009 (UTC) A very fair...
Click to read more »that it's what GR is intended for, but that's not a right I can remove (nor is this, as Addihockey comments, the right place). sonia♫ 05:32, 29 October...
Click to read more »topic. In any case, the link you give is to an essay -- it is neither policy nor guideline, just the opinion of the author(s). --Auntof6 (talk) 22:09, 24...
Click to read more »bigger encyclopaedias just have broader scope. Wikipedia is not paper, but nor is it a book about miscellany. —MC8 (b · t) 12:41, Thursday May 21 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »the articles. I dont think the distinction is clear to all our editors. Nor to the dealers/traffickers, many of whom seem to deal both locally and internationally...
Click to read more »need to become myself admin neither about blocking disruptive contributors nor about blanking entries. There are already enough admins doing a great job...
Click to read more »buildings on the same street as "Palazzo 23" are listed. Neither "Palazzo 23" nor what the article claims as its alternative name "Palazzo d'Este" are listed...
Click to read more »19:56, 25 January 2026 (UTC) Keep Notability is not a function of location nor of the language of sources. Even the delete commenters admit there are sources...
Click to read more »July 2021 (UTC) Delete. Extraordinarily detailed fake. Neither the person, nor the details of his supposed life, can be verified. Note also the use of three...
Click to read more »hence, fails NACTOR. For the sources in the page, IMDB sure isn't reliable, nor the above articles which are more into the movie and promotional somemore...
Click to read more »November 2018 (UTC) Keep per Vermont. The subject is hardly non-notable nor self-proclaimed. There's a difference between the average everyday self-proclaimed...
Click to read more »remove it when they are done. You are not supposed to add it and leave. Nor should it be given for the sorts of edits he is making. It should only be...
Click to read more »on, absolutely nobody would have seen that edit revision as "vandalism" nor would anybody even probably look at it ever... now that you've asked about...
Click to read more »- what you are saying, but that is not what our notability policy states nor requires. If we want to start deleting notable articles that are not yet...
Click to read more »current article is absolutely unkeepable. The claims it makes aren't sourced, nor are they reasonable. Non-notable company. Zhangj1079 talk 15:30, 23 December...
Click to read more »email for each account, and the password would be emailed there. Neither you nor I would know the passwords. I believe each password would have to be changed...
Click to read more »approved for Redirect fix, I couldn't find any trace of community consensus nor approval upon its massive orphan redirect creation. --M7 (talk) 17:22, 26...
Click to read more »for admin, I don't believe it's fair to him to nominate him so quickly, nor do I think it's fair to the process of RfA. Please consider withdrawing this...
Click to read more »nearly identical to the first. None of the sources demonstrate notability, nor are they significant coverage. People can win awards and still not be notable...
Click to read more »that, just because you take it that way doesn't mean that's my intention nor what it is. And for me to take down those items on my userpage, which I might...
Click to read more »"no article should sit in your userspace for weeks"? That isn't a rule, nor could it ever be one. Ottava Rima (talk) 18:35, 29 June 2010 (UTC) Peter...
Click to read more »based on simple style guide and policies of Simple English. Neither you nor Hisham have had any experience with the Simple Wikipedia apart from a few...
Click to read more »just because you haven't heard of something doesn't mean it isn't notable, nor does it mean it don't exist. Such an argument is weak. —Mythdon [talk] [changes]...
Click to read more »Razorflame 20:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC) So he gets way with it. Cause no one checks nor cares about wrestling articles. If people would checks these kind of articles...
Click to read more »tagged for a WP:NPOV_dispute, but even then, not immediately deleted. WP:NOR - A section cannot be deleted simply by claiming the wording is "original...
Click to read more »fine, and the absence of a user page does not make his argument weaker, nor does having a user page make his argument stronger. Pure Evil is a well-established...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Delete. Very bad list which does not explain what it is about, nor does it explain the criteria for inclusion in the list. Useless. On the more...
Click to read more »at the credits on the left side on the bottom, there is no Justin Bieber nor Hilary Duff listed: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/87/02312c.jpg/sr=1...
Click to read more »go and get all the instances of where this has never, ever been an issue nor resulted in blocking for one edit in the past. Jesus. Goblin 17:51, 23 December...
Click to read more »6 July 2008 (UTC) American Eagle (talk · contribs) - This is not an RfA, nor do I (myself) intend to start one based on the result of the reviews here...
Click to read more »presumed that it does not exist. I am not seeing any coverage in sources, nor any results on online maps. Therefore, I will have to vote delete on this...
Click to read more »we don't have the manpower required to keep these categories up to date, nor is it necessary and people won't always remember to date them. As has been...
Click to read more »pages on mirror sites. It's not the list of Disney movies released in 1986, nor does it appear in filmographies of the listed cast—which, by the way, includes...
Click to read more »(at least not from something currently on the site under the same title), nor did a Google search of random phrases find matches on other sites. That said...
Click to read more »Comment I think it should go – no one is going to improve it, it's not simple nor notable. The main wiki page has it covered. Exodus also wasn't that big;...
Click to read more »being a book found on Google Books. There is no English Wikipedia article, nor is there a Wikidata item. SHB2000 (talk) 07:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »phrase to be used to search. The article has no mention of Hawaiian women nor does the same article on enwiki. Even if there was good information in the...
Click to read more »notable enough for an article. I don't get many hits for a "Philip Klinger", nor for any of the spelling variations suggested. The hits I do get are mostly...
Click to read more »is not found in the sources (which only mention a city council position) nor does his name appear in the enWP or faWP lists for the seat he supposedly...
Click to read more »reasoning why these relatively random keystroke choices should redirect to it nor that they are commonly referred to as other names when dealing with the topic...
Click to read more »project. DJSasso's behaviour is not limited to any one isolated incident, nor is it limited to me. The good work that DJSasso does is clear, but it does...
Click to read more »June 2008 (UTC) On Eng Wiki I am AlasdairGreen27. I'm nobody's sock, and nor is PIO; he's a banned user [8] and multiple sockpuppeteer. His known puppets...
Click to read more »· history · links · watch · logs · delete) Template:Country IOC alias NOR (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) Template:Country...
Click to read more »of the template were "similar enough". They look neither visually similar nor syntactically similar. Chenzw Talk 16:30, 12 September 2020 (UTC) The parameters...
Click to read more »not competent to edit here. Neither the user's language is quite clear. Nor their edits are constructive. I suggest a block must be applied to Nalanidil...
Click to read more »however, have no block history on EN, and are not listed on the SPI casepage (nor their subnets) either. From EN logs, the IP that was most likely responsible...
Click to read more »(UTC) A single questionable edit does not justify a sockpuppet accusation nor need a Checkuser to verify it. -- Creol(talk) 06:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »through September and undid many of them. This is not to say I caught them all nor that I didn't over do it at times.... I didnt bother to warn as it was obvious...
Click to read more »creation enabled) block on the /44 IPv6 range for now. Neither this rangeblock nor page protection appears to be a viable long-term solution - a /44 range is...
Click to read more »1955, 23 Nov. 1956, and 25 July 1955) none of which have a reliable source. Nor can a reliable source be found. I have now removed the latest addition. Voceditenore...
Click to read more »10:19, 5 September 2008 (UTC) Delete There is no encyclopedic value to this. Nor is there any administrative value to these other than that they look pretty...
Click to read more »think you're obsessing too much with usernames. It certainly isn't healthy nor beneficial... and everyone isn't out to offend you with theirs, really. --...
Click to read more »are bibliographic entries for her book. I do not see any mention of her nor her book in the Springer source. Source 4 is down. None of these are good...
Click to read more »relevant and shouldn't be removed. My message was not a personal attack, nor was it very offensive. --Gwib -(talk)- 19:13, 8 January 2008 (UTC) I agree...
Click to read more »August 2014 (UTC) On that note, I don't know what you are trying to do, nor do I know of your personal feud with this vandal, but edits like this and...
Click to read more »terrorists. I objected at the time that there were not categories for Christian nor Muslim terrorists. The response I received, and it's a fair one up to a point...
Click to read more »(talk) 08:19, 18 January 2020 (UTC) Delete - The user is neither famous nor infamous on reddit; only 2 of the top comments broke the 1,000 comment karma...
Click to read more »aware. I'm not a big fan of filling CU requests on behalf on IP adresses nor do i know if the admins here are aware of whatever is going on. --Trade (talk)...
Click to read more »Delete I do not believe that heads of monasteries are automatically notable, nor does his length of tenure making him notable. The subject is not notable...
Click to read more »(UTC) One small problem I see with that...many Pokémon are neither legendary nor starters. I'm 100% OK with you creating a "Legendary Pokemon" to dump Mew...
Click to read more »20th century. The article we are looking at has neithewr been vandalized, nor is it a blatant hoax. Fot those not familiar, look at en:Italian Somaliland...
Click to read more »singer, but they haven't won any awards yet, and there is no wikidata item nor an English Wikipedia article for this. Probably a borderline A4, but I feel...
Click to read more »coverage in reliable sources. The current sources do not verify the content nor do they establish notability. They are all primary sources related to the...
Click to read more »nothing more than a bare mention, with no real explanation of the topic, nor even a source. If the creator or other interested parties are able to create...
Click to read more »accusations, namely "he (Larry King) had no such right to homosexuality, nor does anyone else in the world" show that these acts of vandalism to religion-related...
Click to read more »I have removed the birth year of 1972 as I can find no source for this, nor for him having been born in the United States. One source says that he is...
Click to read more »competitions in the world, we have to be careful because most are notable nor have massive following. See: Category:Brazilian jiu-jitsu competitions. Otherwise...
Click to read more »notability. This page in no way meets wikipedia's standards for notability nor Biographies of a living person.-- Creol(talk) 23:48, 7 June 2007 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »other wikis is none of this community's business, and there is no obligation nor reason for us to interfere in the affairs of other wikis. Chenzw Talk 12:13...
Click to read more »Serious long-term conditions like Parkinson's and BPD are neither trivia nor gossip. They're also nothing like stubbing a toe. Some people are trying...
Click to read more »228 (talk) 21:33, 10 November 2013 (UTC) Interestingly, neither MANNdat nor Väteraufbruch für Kinder exists on the Simple English Wikipedia (or even...
Click to read more »These things have never changed. Rule with an iron fist was never in vogue. Nor was accusing people of saying things they never said. fr33kman talk 00:08...
Click to read more »female singers and what if a singer doesn't identify themselves as male nor female? --SHB2000 (talk) 01:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »18:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC) Keep Delete -- EN dosent these types of things, nor should we? -- Da Punk '95 talk 04:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Delete, per Da...
Click to read more »people stop piling onto this discussion. Note that I am neither supporting nor opposing any of those options. I'm saying that throwing around comments like...
Click to read more »move Tadpole shrimp to Notostraca, as in enWP. They are neither shrimps nor tadpoles! Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:48, 12 September 2011 (UTC) Done, though...
Click to read more »spur of the moment thing) when he had not asked if he could. Neither me nor BG7 knew about it. BG7 decided it wasn't a good idea and removed his nom...
Click to read more »11 August 2010 (UTC) OK. I wont even change my talk page or revert edits (nor fix typos; just adding cats). Thank you. Hazard-SJ Talk 21:52, 11 August...
Click to read more »so are related to a poorly advised RFD; and 5 or so are your user page. Nor would I be impressed by the fact you haven't edited in 2+ months then suddenly...
Click to read more »citation should have been to page 125. Neither the name Kunigunde Niklasin nor Margareta Karthäuserin is on that index page. The citations to the index...
Click to read more »The media has no coverage of this company, therefore I see no notability nor needing an encyclopedic article. PotsdamLamb (talk) 16:49, 24 May 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »a global issue and one based in policy. I have not been nasty with you, nor warned you. I have pointed out that as a teacher of children you should understand...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:09, 7 August 2023 (UTC) Currently presented sources do not satisfy nor show that the subject surpasses WP:GNG. A09 (talk) 11:33, 7 August 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »really see the point of it since there is nothing negative in the discussion, nor is there any personal information in it linking it to a specific person....
Click to read more »above here. I want it to be made clear that we neither abused our positions nor engaged in "unexcusable" behaviour. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:57, 24 October...
Click to read more »panies)#Primary_criteria. Significant coverage is not stocks information nor things such as lists. Merger news aren't significant. Lastly, the Forbes...
Click to read more »have talked to think about the painting by Picasso, and neither the city, nor the bombing of the city. I will take the case of en:The Second of May 1808...
Click to read more »tool, but wWith only 600 edits total, that does not show to me the activity nor the trustworthiness that I want to see in someone that I support to become...
Click to read more »reason for there to be a french translation of Diarrhea. It has no meaning nor help. I am aware that we shouldn't be making RfDs while the discussion is...
Click to read more »A Link to the Past (talk) 03:49, 22 July 2008 (UTC) No offense intended nor is any hostility that you sense, A Link To The Past, but I don't think you...
Click to read more »term city is used in English but legally has no meaning (Neither Montreal nor Quebec cities are legally cities) In each of these areas (and many more)...
Click to read more »needed: The source is a little bit reliable (i.e. neither generally reliable nor generally unreliable), and can be used depending on context. Editors may...
Click to read more »sources exist and are simply not included, it isn't a reason to delete (nor is it WP:CRYSTAL). Vermont (talk) 22:06, 12 January 2019 (UTC) @Wekeepwhatwekill:...
Click to read more »delete) This is a book written by a notable writer, but neither the book nor the TV series based on it are notabled. I added some info to the article...
Click to read more »Not done; It is obvious but just having two accounts is not a voilation, nor are their edits. Let's wait until the actually commit an offense. fr33kman...
Click to read more »css or Template:myTemplate/styles-foo.css, but not Template:styles-foo.css nor Template:foo.css. Generally follow the MediaWiki coding conventions for CSS...
Click to read more »idea what I just read. NonvocalScream (talk) 16:17, 25 August 2009 (UTC) Nor did I. I don't think there's a way to express that in simple terms, and I...
Click to read more »with your advice and neutral point of view, it doesn't take that much time nor is it difficult for me. I don't believe any further adjustments should be...
Click to read more »voting or comment of anyone. And they are undoubtedly never passing mentions, nor-self published or fringe or undue, they are all from renowned established...
Click to read more »I should note at the outset, that I have no prior interaction with him, nor do I know if this represents a pattern of behavior; so I'll just state what...
Click to read more »English Language and qualifications in computing and I cannot understand it, nor the explanations above. I think it should be merged with Lossless data compression...
Click to read more »guess this is the case if there are sources which are neither social media, nor rainbow press... I guess, if we had an article on en:Ice Bucket Challenge...
Click to read more »checked at WorldCat (which includes Chilean libraries) and neither the book nor anything else by the author appears to be held at any of the following libraries:...
Click to read more »September 2024 (UTC) Delete Despite best efforts, I can not find any notability nor decent sourcing for this person. Does not help that the creator of the article...
Click to read more »something that should be categorised by in view; enwiki has no equivalent, nor does anywhere else to my knowledge. --IWI (talk) 03:29, 31 December 2020...
Click to read more »by me. In general the company easily passed WP:NCORP. It is neither spam, nor not notable. It's not the biggest company, but enough sourced. It's also...
Click to read more »including some of their names, but the book likely isn't a reliable source nor does it mention them in much context. Vermont (talk) 14:42, 31 March 2018...
Click to read more »@SHB2000? But then it exist in 4 languages doesn't mean it can fit here, nor meets GNG. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:18, 18 October 2021 (UTC) By not...
Click to read more »advertising --O`oyle (talk) 13:28, 29 August 2023 (UTC) Article is not promotional nor advertising. I don’t understand why the negative feedbacks so much against...
Click to read more »haven't registered on the website. They are not a lower category of users, nor a special group we tolerate. They are not like swarms of locusts trying to...
Click to read more »non-wikipedia official title doesn't contain the term "constitutional republic" nor is this term contained in the US Library of Congress description. This can...
Click to read more »not extend to this project.) Where the article does not appear to be spam, nor would it constitute vandalism, and I don't see any indication the author...
Click to read more »of several short paragraphs. Ref. 2 is a resume, which is not a reliable nor independent source. Ref. 3 is famousbirthdays.com, a website which has been...
Click to read more »someone thinks the subject is notable... There is noone saying it is not, nor a reason for this RfD to exist. Look at the reasoning, it was sent here because...
Click to read more »he believes marriage is between a man and a woman. This is not offensive nor disruptive. As I said, unless every opinional UBX is banned (examples: 1...
Click to read more »been used abusively here, given that both were not active at the same time, nor were they involved in votestacking, etc. Yes, ChristianMan16/HornetMan16...
Click to read more »@Peterdownunder: @Krinkle: Ok , it works for a bunch of new pages, but neither marks nor advances when tapped on Template:Deaths in, Wikipedia:TPLATE, and Mexican...
Click to read more »other Wikis have the category is irrelevant. The term is neither simple nor clear, and so does not serve us well here. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:35, 3 May...
Click to read more »Many actors and singers are not known outside of their home country either, nor would a city's mayor, but they are still notable for inclusion. It is true...
Click to read more »establish notability for this person. Arguments for inclusion are weak. Nor can Chikki Panday borrow notability from his brother, the actor. Even the...
Click to read more »sites, but non-English equivalents don't work on English-language projects, nor on other-language project besides the language edition one is on. Writing...
Click to read more »page for further review. I do not know anything about football in Japan, nor which teams are notable. That is why I used which resources I could find...
Click to read more »claim of notability. A person is not inherently notable for being in a band. Nor is that person notable because of their choice in sexual partners. As those...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep I think it should stay the same and it should not be a redirect nor be moved. Thetree284 (talk) 00:24, 12 October 2024 (UTC) @Thetree284 If you...
Click to read more »about crypto prices. This is neither in-depth with respect to the subject nor is it independent of the subject. Source 2 suffers the same problem as source...
Click to read more »because he's in the US and I'm in Australia? I've never even came across SH, nor interfered with anything to do with him. And I've never vandalised or socked...
Click to read more »evidence that Narasu was an author of highly cited work (NPROF criterion 1), nor could I find specific evidence of Narasu's influence on Ambedkar's work/philosophy...
Click to read more »you to decide what does or does not cause a person anxiety. Neither you nor I can deny anyone their irrational fear, whether is it of a clowns, confined...
Click to read more »strictly on Wikipedia, I can't see how this request violates the policy nor do I see how we can't remove the rights before the inactivity deadline. Since...
Click to read more »the proposal itself is not notable at present. Therefore, neither the book nor the proposal should be here. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:18, 18 April 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »A Link to the Past (talk) 03:49, 22 July 2008 (UTC) No offense intended nor is any hostility that you sense, A Link To The Past, but I don't think you...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn’t pass the WP:ANYBIO, nor the WP:GNG. 🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN (💬) 09:26, 18 September 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »won't hurt us. If at that point we've not heard anything from the person, nor have we been able to verify the data, then I'd say the page should be removed...
Click to read more »The man with this name is neither a woman, signed with any of those labels nor has a connection to Sum 41. Date of birth is the only thing the woman originally...
Click to read more »don’t think articles that are subtly homophobic should be welcome here, nor should the editor making them. IWI (chat) 11:47, 15 March 2019 (UTC) Article...
Click to read more »a balanced view in RfD discussions, and doesn't automatically vote keep nor delete, and instead gives well-reasoned discussions, and I think that we...
Click to read more »ISO (w:Countries in the International Organization for Standardization) nor are UN member states. When it comes to countries, we will usually categorise...
Click to read more »actually called "LehmberGinni") does not mention what movie it is about nor any information about her part in the movie. Is she the main lead or an uncredited...
Click to read more »do, is a bad thing. I don't see Vector or Eptalon stop in their supports, nor Archer7 when he was one. Numbers, numbers, numbers. In every oppose you make...
Click to read more »two are neither related to each other (different regions in the world), nor to the first two. --Eptalon (talk) 09:01, 4 February 2020 (UTC) @Eptalon:...
Click to read more »main page. I've never disagreed with any of the guidelines or policies here nor have I seen any major changes to rules since I've been here. As for project...
Click to read more »Production. Nothing comes up in the Google News Archive for the subject nor in any of the other databases I looked through. Right now, it seems like...
Click to read more »user's uploads to the Wikimedia Commons. It isn't particularly helpful, but nor is it necessary to delete. Vermont (talk) 18:04, 25 February 2019 (UTC) Hi...
Click to read more »was added was a practicing professional, not a scientist. Neither the SEWP nor the EnWP article described Salvador Minuchin as a scientist. He was a therapist...
Click to read more »have had coverage in those newspapers, but you didn't put those sources in, nor do we know if they are notable sources either. Read up on the links I gave...
Click to read more »have a higher notability bar than en, but no-one has stated that we do, nor has anyone said that we do not. Jim Michael (talk) 16:03, 30 September 2014...
Click to read more »2019 (UTC) @Aaronsheij: I will note that interviews are neither reliable nor secondary. Further, your baseless accusation of paid editing and your claims...
Click to read more »whether good or bad. The information in this article is neither heated nor arguable in that the article merely says the person's name, occupation, and...
Click to read more »criteria of BK. None of the awards it apparently won meet that guideline, nor is there any indication it received significant coverage in reliable sources...
Click to read more »I don't like how some of our frequent contributors are being harrassed, nor how Simple tends to be a refuge for troublemakers who've been banned from...
Click to read more »There is no mention of this party by name in en:Politics of Maharashtra, nor does the page have the words "nationalist," "separatist," or "secessionist...
Click to read more »target (person using that IP) at any time without warning. They do not own it nor control what is put on it. bThat info on the page almost def should be deleted...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:02, 31 July 2020 (UTC) Don't support the phrase "real thing" nor referring to the Olympics as the "main event" here. Paralympians are just...
Click to read more »request, not for general ranting, so those comments didn't belong here. (Nor, really, do these comments about them.) However, they are still in the page...
Click to read more »us keep both CATs then and use them as intended. It is not the first time nor the last time people will be in identical cats. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have...
Click to read more »Darubrub (Let me know) 17:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC) Quick delete Neither Mortenensen nor Symonowicz has any sign of being notable. Identity theft happens all the...
Click to read more »category (or inanimate objects which would also not have a known date of death nor will they ever.) The fact that it is not used properly and would be flooded...
Click to read more »needed. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2016 (UTC) Delete. Neither claims nor shows notability. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:17, 13 August 2016 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »be more suitable in the project namespace. Article is not encyclopedic (nor simple) enough and suggests a COI (seeing that this method is used by the...
Click to read more »thing. Sources are not discounted because they are in another language, nor are they considered unreliable unless you can demonstrate it. I don't understand...
Click to read more »exists. However, all claims to notability are false/hoaxes. Neither Arsenal nor RB Leipzig even know who the player is, and I actually wouldn't be surprised...
Click to read more »January 2012 (UTC) A: No. The publisher has not said anywhere on the website, nor on the planner itself, where they have gotten their information from. Also...
Click to read more »no information provided on any of them that is not on there main article nor is it likely any will be found. The entire difference on the En:Shikoku article...
Click to read more »September 2024 (UTC) Comment: I just want to point out that neither this page, nor the page iron oxide has a lot of info... Eptalon (talk) 10:23, 29 September...
Click to read more »it up. It is not from OR, it is from the book itself. It is not copied, nor is it Original Research. I have seen that this Wikipedia may not want my...
Click to read more »ever accused it of being a source of spam/ads, or of not being credible. Nor does Google agree: the site has been indexed for a long time by Google News...
Click to read more »single act (13 minutes old) with no steps taken to correct the vandalism nor steps to warn the vandal prior to asking for the IP to be blocked - Definitely...
Click to read more »actor currently in acting school that has never acted in any film, TV series nor on stage. There is no explanation why such a person is notable, so it can...
Click to read more »guideline, but per en:Wikipedia:Notability (events), neither the person nor his suicide has any lasting historical significance. 205.154.244.130 (talk)...
Click to read more »wikidata:Q15975478 salted on WP ru, ru:Рашизм, as an example); it is neither an exclusion nor an inclusion criteria. The article on Christine Weston Chandler also exists...
Click to read more »(UTC) Where are these articles? Because Chedi Amir doesn't exist on enwiki, nor can I find any articles of similar titles here. Computer Fizz (talk) 16:54...
Click to read more »believe that I haven't been doing that nearly as much as I have in the past nor without thought. Every single QD tag I have placed since my last RfA has...
Click to read more »:int|rtion))|tip)\b)" replace="$1ernmost"/> <Typo word="Northernmost" find="\bNor(?<=\b[tT]he Nor)thernmost\b" replace="northernmost"/> <Typo word="Southernmost" find="\bSou(...
Click to read more »deities from various religions, none of which are connected by the sources nor termed "Pakistani' (anachronistic). Gotitbro (talk) 00:00, 5 September 2024...
Click to read more »