Redirect to:
Shortcut WP:NACWP:NAC Often, deletion discussions are closed by administrators. However, sometimes people who are not admins are allowed to close them...
Click to read more »heading for a restoration of NAC. Delete.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 08:25, 5 July 2023 (UTC) Delete - We do not do NACs anymore, so this template is...
Click to read more »Goblin 19:19, 13 November 2009 (UTC) I ♥ GoblinBots! As admin I confirm the nac closure. --Barras (talk) 19:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC) Category:Indian Occupied...
Click to read more »August 2012 (UTC) Done By Eptalon, who also added patroller. See WP:RBK. NAC.--Chip123456 TalkChanges 21:56, 18 August 2012 (UTC) Sarrus (talk · contribs ·...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedily NAC kept, done/ing some cleanup work on it. Goblin 17:12, 22 December 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »grant rights. It is about the judgement call. NACs in RFDs: I personally am not bothered much by NACs in RFDs that are unambiguously (100%) a keep result...
Click to read more »closed by a non-admin and I don't think the consensus is clear enough for a NAC in this case. I think at RFD will be easier than DRV. This was initially...
Click to read more »arguments, with my neutral !vote. If you look at my work at RfD, or rather my NAC Speedy Keeps, you'll see I can determine consensus. I'd like to ask if it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. Nalin-choudhary123 (talk) 11:34, 25 June 2023 (UTC) en:WP:NAC allows for NAC and it seems to help there a lot. We used to have it, but it is inactive...
Click to read more »can avoid it don't, some people follow the more open idea like you had for NACs where if its obvious they will still close it. -Djsasso (talk) 18:28, 28...
Click to read more »it's rather clearly heading for a delete, and is already controversial, so NAC should not have been applied - there's a reason we nominate our admins. If...
Click to read more »articles without ANY fuss. -- Da Punk '95 talk 11:53, 18 July 2008 (UTC) NAC is only used for RfD's where the vote is either a unanimous "keep" after...
Click to read more »:or|re)v([a-z]+)\b" replace="$1mprov$2"/> <Typo word="Inaccurate" find="\b([iI])n(?:a|nac?)cura(c[a-z]+|te[a-z]*)\b" replace="$1naccura$2"/> <Typo word="Inaugurates"...
Click to read more »personal take was that I wouldn't mind NACs for unambiguous results, but I don't see any consensus supporting an NAC process in the 2023 discussion. Chenzw Talk ...
Click to read more »Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 09:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC) (Nac)The only reason why you might want to do this is to be more simple. I don't...
Click to read more »