Redirect to:
en:Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Projects This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »en:Wikipedia:Long-term abuse This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »deletion was to Keep. Also redirected to Long division per consensus. Chenzw Talk 02:51, 2 March 2020 (UTC) Long Division (edit · talk · history · links...
Click to read more »Long Island (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Long...
Click to read more »created recently Special:Ancient pages – pages created long ago that may need work Special:Long pages – pages that are the longest Special:Short pages...
Click to read more »other users to make the article longer. The template will show this message on the page: This short article can be made longer. You can help Wikipedia by adding...
Click to read more »or disruption to Wikipedia. Blocks are cancelled if they are not (or no longer) needed to stop such damage or disruption. You, as a blocked user, are responsible...
Click to read more »change almost any article at any time, even without logging in, and many long-time users do not log in. Creating an account is fast, easy, and free, and...
Click to read more »it has no incoming links at all from other articles. In other words, as long as there is one other article which links to it, the article should not be...
Click to read more »using Wikipedia policies and guidelines to delay a decision by making a long debate. Do not simply think that an issue will not pass just because things...
Click to read more »accidentally or intentionally – to place the notice required by these terms. This short article can be made longer. You can help Wikipedia by adding to it....
Click to read more »implications that must be managed by the Foundation's press relations team. Avoid long blocks of these addresses and be especially careful in formulating your block...
Click to read more »different talk page Keep signatures short, both in display and markup. Extremely long signatures with a lot of HTML/wiki markup make page changing and discussion...
Click to read more »they link to pages that do not exist, and should first be created. For a long list of "basic encyclopedia articles" (10,000), see: Vital articles - expanded...
Click to read more »also say why you changed something. Some people use abbreviations (making long words or phrases shorter) in their change summary. There is a list of abbreviations...
Click to read more »A sleeper account is an account that has not edited in a long time and essentially is dormant. Technically, a sleeper account is still enabled, and it...
Click to read more »deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 19:17, 8 May 2026 (UTC) Long Mejia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request...
Click to read more »can be nominated more than once, as long as the hooks are different and the time between each nomination is long enough - usually about four months. We...
Click to read more »page. Most blocks should be for 24 hours, but a user may be blocked for longer if it is needed. Partial blocks also exist, preventing a user or IP from...
Click to read more »are some users who wanted to help make this Wikipedia better, but who no longer want to because the personal attack scared them away. People who make bad...
Click to read more »kind. Of course, an article can report objectively about such things, as long as an attempt is made to approach a neutral point of view. You might wish...
Click to read more »bored with it. I definitely agree. That's the only reason I've stayed for so long. :P How'd you stumble across Wikipedia? I knew about Wikipedia for ages,...
Click to read more »miss any major facts and details. The article should be several kilobytes long, not including infoboxes, images, references, other websites, interwiki,...
Click to read more »already per this discussion. Barras talk 14:08, 2 October 2013 (UTC) Template:Long fossil range (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) Osiris...
Click to read more »I am no longer going to be using this bot (at least, not in the near future), I would like to request that its' bot flag be removed so long as it can...
Click to read more »and air would long have worn out, even if the sun is still in its main sequence stage. After the Sun reaches a point where it can no longer get bigger,...
Click to read more »with rollback may also use it to revert their own edits in mainspace as long as those edits are a mistake and also not likely to cause a dispute. Rollback...
Click to read more »numbers.[REF] There is a time limit on copyright. If something was created a long time ago, the copyright of it may have expired. Things that are commonly...
Click to read more »article must be fairly complete. Usually, articles should be a few kilobytes long, although shorter pages may also be nominated. The article must have gone...
Click to read more »bold. That means that it is very important that they be written. For a very long list of basic articles (10,000), see: Vital articles - expanded. Count checked:...
Click to read more »exists on the English Wikipedia is like writing a research paper. It is long, boring, and most of time a lot of work. Therefore, article writing isn't...
Click to read more »concerned with articles named as subpages of other articles; this is no longer done. {{Workpage}} Accidental linking and hard-wired category schemes Case...
Click to read more »page history when they are no longer useful. Think about the anonymous user's contribution history when deciding how long to leave warnings visible. When...
Click to read more »deletion was to Delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 11:22, 29 January 2025 (UTC) Long Story Short (musical) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)...
Click to read more »(talk) 07:59, 28 July 2026 (UTC) AnonLionCavalier83, thank you, this was a long-term vandal. Please report these to vandalism in progress so they can be...
Click to read more »which perform jobs on Wikipedia. Usually, they do jobs which would take a long time to do without the bot. Bots perform their jobs under a different user...
Click to read more »First off, I'd like to wish everyone at Simple a happy Summer! It's been a long year, and congrats to all those graduating moving up a year in school. Now...
Click to read more »reason to check a user. Note that alternative accounts are not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of the policies (for example, to vote more...
Click to read more »constructive users occasionally make mistakes, sometimes a Wikipedia user creates long-term problems by persistently changing a page or set of pages with information...
Click to read more »sometimes a good or very good article is changed in such a way that it no longer meets the criteria, or new information may become available about the topic...
Click to read more »do (or agreed to) repeatedly. I would issue each subsequent block with a longer varied time depending if the user repeats the same thing over and over again...
Click to read more »everything. Current limitations include: Slow to load — It may take some time for long, complex pages to start in VisualEditor. In the future, the software will...
Click to read more »work on the Simple English Wikipedia. They are based on two things: How long they have been an editor The number of edits they have made. Unlike other...
Click to read more »articles and add anything they like. Sometimes bad changes stay in place for a long time. Wikipedia guidelines such as Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No...
Click to read more »build an encyclopedia could be blocked or banned. Not wanting to contribute. Long history of vandalism that does not show signs of changing. Advertising. Edit...
Click to read more »of the subject is usually the same as the page title. If the article is long enough to have several paragraphs, the first paragraph should be short and...
Click to read more »was to Delete. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 15:16, 14 April 2026 (UTC) Long Lake Library (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close...
Click to read more »notice saying this on your user page. Because of the large templates and long category names, some editors move the license templates to a subpage (see...
Click to read more »that Simple News will be published weekly now. This has been my aim for a long time, and I am pleased I can manage that now. I hope that I can get DYK to...
Click to read more »trolling and disruption. Also you should know this since your last RfA is not long time ago and it was deleted upon your request. Do you think that requesting...
Click to read more »be linked to other pages and they can be changed quickly. You can write long articles. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. It does not tell how to use words...
Click to read more »view" and pasted the text of the entire article. Only one sentence was flagged as "too long". I fixed it now -Baangla (talk) 05:26, 11 August 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »theory used by biologists. It explains how animals and plants changed over a long time, and how they have come to be the way they are. Earth is very old, about...
Click to read more »thesaurus would be appreciated. Tools for measuring textual difficulty (long words, long sentences, etc.) include: Readability Score: online readability calculators...
Click to read more »that are usually wrong. It says things that can not be proven. It has a long list with many wrong things. It was written by someone who writes a lot of...
Click to read more »flags. Non-crats are allowed to close requests for adminship as "failed", as long as it is obvious, for example, if a nomination is eligible for speedy closure...
Click to read more »Having to re-create an article from scratch often takes a long time and can result in a long-term loss of encyclopedic information from Wikipedia. Note...
Click to read more »If people purposefully put wrong information into Wikipedia, to see how long it can stay there, or to cause disruption, this is wasting people's time...
Click to read more »template code to them. When a template is substituted, the result is no longer linked to the template, so it will be hard to find all pages displaying...
Click to read more »for desysopping included sysops resigning or because of inactivity for a long of time. This Wikipedia does not have an arbitration committee, so most desysopping...
Click to read more »sometimes. Or, the articles may have some misspelled words. It can take a long time for students to finish writing an article. Students feel bad when their...
Click to read more »also be pruned in advance, by many actions each person could take to avoid long-term storing of more revisions. You might wonder if it even matters that...
Click to read more »TheAE talk 23:55, 20 January 2009 (UTC) First edit to simple-wiki in a long time... I concur with AE. It's about time your community ban on en-wiki was...
Click to read more »should be linked", below), but it is not Wikipedia's purpose to include a long or complete list of links about each topic. No page should be linked from...
Click to read more »son at home for the afternoon. He was a troublemaker, so she gave him a long list of things not to do. "Don't play with the oven. Don't break anything...
Click to read more »Wikipedia (for the purposes of this nomination, I'll call him Max). Max is a long-time contributor to the project who's edited for over 1 1/2 years. In that...
Click to read more »find subtopics of interest. Create sub-headings if a section becomes too long, and choose a wording that describes what is discussed in the section. Do...
Click to read more »(UTC) AE, I write stubs because I don't want them to be too long and for it to take a long time. I just put inportant facts in, and sometimes an image...
Click to read more »not do this because I would distrust the other candidates, It took me a long time to think about it, some will probably see me as a hat-collector. I just...
Click to read more »then discover Simple English Wikipedia? I have no idea any more... It was long ago, my first edits in SEWP were like end of 2005. The first message on my...
Click to read more »circle - but how about all three? Think about it: it really doesn't take that long to check over an article for the DYK criteria, and it takes even less time...
Click to read more »analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims so long as they have been published by a reliable secondary source. Primary sources...
Click to read more »judge. The Wikicup has already started, so entries will not be accepted any longer. However, you are always welcome to help in any other part of the project...
Click to read more »some very slow templates, when used many times per page, were causing a long time run, followed afterward by the Wikimedia Foundation Error box, such...
Click to read more »in North America. Monarchs are known for their long annual migrations. In North America, they travel long distances south in the fall, and north in the...
Click to read more »subject is involved in, teachers, or fans. Obscure topics are perfectly okay to have articles on Wikipedia, as long as they meet notability guidelines....
Click to read more »Razor's request, I'd rather them import and simplify then copy/paste. As long as they are careful (be very very careful of including templates, i.e DONT)...
Click to read more »can find something of interest to write about. A Big Weekend needs to be long enough to allow editors from around the world to take part within their own...
Click to read more »three crat supports. Per the new rules, he would be considered passed as long as there are no good objections. There is 1 oppose vote, which may have been...
Click to read more »Non-notability is based only on a lack of suitable evidence of notability, and no longer applies once evidence is found. It is not possible to prove non-notability...
Click to read more »from the English Wikipedia for article work. I have been editing here for a long time and have considerable knowledge of the tool. Regards, —§ stay (sic)...
Click to read more »method has no advantage over using the gadget, as Twinkle settings are no longer stored using "TwinkleConfig" lines in your personal JavaScript file. If...
Click to read more »long equations (especially, near images or infoboxes) would be shifted down a page, causing a wide text-gap to appear, because they would be too long...
Click to read more »Barnstars are usually used for an editor who has been doing good work for a long time. The following awards are more often given for a particular action or...
Click to read more »en:Wikipedia:Long-term abuse This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »en:Wikipedia:Long-term abuse This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »the surrounding environment, a snowball might require much longer to melt, even years longer in permafrost conditions. Scientists, when digging into glaciers...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. Perhaps some of the rules need to be looked at again. They may no longer be right for this Wikipedia. So, it is important to watch the newcomer for...
Click to read more »been userfied by the author. As I said below this is probably not a good long-term outcome, so I may revisit this if no further improvements are made over...
Click to read more »CPU time (you can look in the source code of a rendered page to see how long a template or module took to parse). And relative to standard Lua, Scribunto's...
Click to read more »oppose - Yes, he did "threaten" suicide, and was rude - I support a week-long block. But I see no reason why he should be banned, especially considering...
Click to read more »skilled users (who have participated here or on a different project for a long time). This itself is one of the most important factors that makes this wiki...
Click to read more »(UTC) Best case, the elections might end in 3 months, which is a long time. The longer they are open, the higher the chances that people will oppose, and...
Click to read more »clear cases of vandalism. Another such case occurred just now. diffs In the long run, I think the bot needs a few changes: Get away from a strict "anonymous...
Click to read more »(https://www.observatoriodaimprensa.com.br/e-noticias/site-arqueologico/) and long-form articles on digital memory and the societal role of archives in Shifter...
Click to read more »we should do it and be bold (at least sometimes). Agreed, discussions are long but we fail to /do/ anything in reality. That's true, we discuss, but don't...
Click to read more »kept because their very long lifespans are notable. Everyone in the supercentenarian cats are notable for their exceptionally long lifespans. It is a defining...
Click to read more »simplification because they are long not complex. Many of the pages on the Long page list are quite simple. Lets replace the Long page list with a complex page...
Click to read more »think of the article in general helps. Even the smallest of edits help! As long as you are participating in some way, you could help decide to promote an...
Click to read more »I just don't think you have enough edits and have been fully active for long enough at this time. Kansan (talk) 17:11, 4 November 2010 (UTC) I agree with...
Click to read more »taught very early in language. Just for comparison, when I learned Latin so long ago, the passive voice was taught before we moved into sentence structure...
Click to read more »articles I believe that short articles can be very good article as well as longer ones. There is a great difference between the length needed for an article...
Click to read more »@Razorflame - Do you really have an important need the import tool? Having a very long list of individual articles for asteriods is not what simplewp needs right...
Click to read more »"Why aren't these pages copy-edited?" Or, if they have been here a bit longer: "Why aren't these pages wikified?" ("Wikifying" is the process of adding...
Click to read more »Beyond the occasional dramatic outburst though (which she has thankfully long outgrown!), career highlights include hosting the NYC Greenwich Village Halloween...
Click to read more »will change. If this was one logged-in user, he'd have a block log a mile long, and we should really be considering a ban, and revert/remove any edits this...
Click to read more »that many articles already approach typical Wikipedia prose with paragraph-long sentences. Perhaps a limit of 20-25 words per sentence would be useful.Eloquence...
Click to read more »spend more time? Making articles longer, making (V)GAs or writing new articles? Well, I'll say making articles longer (that's why I asked all to join WP...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) As to yourself, I doubt you will stay a non-admin for very much longer. All I was trying to say was that we have an unusually high percentage of...
Click to read more »Yotty in his ‘kerchief, and I in my cap, Had just settled our brains for a long winter’s nap When out on the wiki there was such a smash, Jimbo spilled his...
Click to read more »are too long, read the TLDR (too long, didn't read) version at the end. This problem with Netoholic that Archer7 mentions has a much longer history than...
Click to read more »suggested a week-long vote. I am sort of inclined to think that they've been posted for a month and a half and thus have had that long (plus the time before...
Click to read more »finding unexpected things is part of what makes Wikipedia interesting (as long as you can still find the expected things as well). The Wikipedia software...
Click to read more »Candidate withdrew self-nomination. Self Nomination...I may not have been here long but I've had my Admin tools on my Wikia since September. I think I'm ready...
Click to read more »ambassadors: Angela (no longer active on this project) tofutwitch11, (no longer active on this project) Reception123 (no longer active on this project)...
Click to read more »vertical-bars). When a data item is too long to fit into a standardized infobox, consider appending a simple infobox for longer notes: {| class=infobox width=245px...
Click to read more »think I should be an administrator because I have been on this wiki for a long time and I have helped take vandals down and simplified articles. And I've...
Click to read more »community discussion. If the user had been blocked for immaturity/sockpuppetry/long term vandalizing, I wouldn't take the decision on my own. Pmlineditor Talk...
Click to read more »so long as it looks halfway decent. My other thought is not to speak whole articles, at least not in the first place. With some articles as long as 90...
Click to read more »with a long, long history of vandalism (such as Ricky Martin) and some content pages like cat and dog. I'm not talking hundreds of pages. How long for?...
Click to read more »reconsider if you can show long term, consistent abuse of the tools. Malinaccier (talk) 16:00, 13 July 2009 (UTC) De-adminship is for a long pattern of abuse....
Click to read more »happened long ago, and it is no longer who I am. (Activity note: I'm active for usually a few hours a day, (due to school) but I won't be gone for long periods...
Click to read more »the "Index" and "Page" namespaces in the Proofread Page extension are no longer localized (bug #47596). Please check scripts that depend on $wgCanonicalNamespace...
Click to read more »choose an article from the list we wrote or pick up a topic of your own so long as it is close to the main theme and focusing on closing the gender gap....
Click to read more »(UTC) Regular editors will remember we have problems with exceptionally long and technically complex articles. They are brought over from En wiki and...
Click to read more »have been proposed for demotion; this means that someone thinks they no longer meet the criteria for the category listed. Look at the proposed demotions...
Click to read more »to deal with change page names, or with complicated naming issues where a long series of redirects would be problematic (I clean up double-redirect problems...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) I can only see one discussion about {{Link FA}}, and it wasn't a long one either, so I'd like to know what people think about making this template...
Click to read more »deletion was to Delete. , quickly Obvious hoax. Bears the signature of a long-term abuser. Osiris (talk) 03:34, 7 July 2012 (UTC) My Family and Me (edit...
Click to read more »Headings will be added automatically to the table of contents for the page, so long as three others already exist. If you don't want a table of contents for...
Click to read more »have brought up any concerns then a crats ups them. Community voting no longer happens. -DJSasso (talk) 14:22, 7 December 2009 (UTC) The above adminship...
Click to read more »de-adminship or de-bureaucratship) should be done. Otherwise, it is not needed as long as the emergency has passed and it does not look like it will happen again...
Click to read more »and has matured greatly in the last 5+ months. Also a positive, he took a long wikibreak after the one RfA, which shows he is very stable and doesn't blow...
Click to read more »should be said that taking longer and more convoluted summaries to get across a concept then with the English Wiki is fine as long as it does so with Simple...
Click to read more »justification does. The purpose is to align the sides equally so that there is no longer or shorter lines. I'm not sure how the margins would look wider, but what...
Click to read more »might no longer reflect what normal people would willingly follow. What seemed to be a reasonable format limitation, years ago, might no longer apply. Also...
Click to read more »In consideration of a week-long internet block in Iran, Wikipedia Asian Month 2019 contest has been extended for a week past November. The articles submitted...
Click to read more ».. possibly a bit more and to be honest as a very long term lurker I assumed he was an Admin long before he became one because he has always acted as...
Click to read more »--Kanonkas(talk) 20:13, 25 April 2009 (UTC) Oppose this user has not been here long enough IMO, I just noticed this user about 4 days ago. This user has only...
Click to read more »these links and self-categorize itself.==See also== {{Split}} {{Split dab}} {{Split section}} {{Split portions}} {{Merge portions from}} {{Very long}}...
Click to read more »September 2010 (UTC) The general idea is to block people for what they do. As long as an account does productive (non-controversial), ie. "good" edits, there...
Click to read more »Deleted the lot. Majorly (talk) 18:44, 2 June 2007 (UTC) I find this article long and confusing. One reason is there is the Disneyland Resort which consists...
Click to read more »media and broadcasting career,. For example, serving as a core expert on a long running national Tv show like celebs go Dating, and co hosting a syndicated...
Click to read more »the reason: Tagged for notability issues for 4 years since 2011 - way too long for any Wikipedia. The Checker of Kemz Five (Talk to me!) 19:43, 28 October...
Click to read more »allow people to use and change text that they find on Wikipedia, but only as long as attribution is done. The CC-BY-SA, section 4(c), states that: You must...
Click to read more »German-language requests, for example. That way, we should be able to no longer run into cases like Kambly (and Emile Bloch SA, which I have not restored;...
Click to read more »character requirement for an article for DYK (it sits at <400). Even if it were long enough, the source for the hook is simply "Jones, p. 211." The book is no...
Click to read more »"LTA" page? Cheers, Razorflame 00:34, 21 August 2008 (UTC) en:Wikipedia:Long-term abuse. Cassandra talk 00:42, 21 August 2008 (UTC) Alert: The Disney...
Click to read more »-- Chris†ianMan16 t c r 01:50, 24 January 2009 (UTC) ChristianMan, I have tried for a long time not to comment on this, but I think that you have pushed things too...
Click to read more »copyright holder's use. In the case of a music sample, the length should be no longer than 10 percent of the song's original length or 30 seconds, whichever is...
Click to read more »like they are in the userspace of users who are no longer active here / have been inactive for a long time.--Eptalon (talk) 10:51, 1 November 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Juliancolton interviewed a long-term editor, Mikemoral (talk · contribs). Hi Mikemoral, thanks for answering some of my questions. You're a long-time editor who...
Click to read more »footnotes. Also, indentation and line-splitting can be used, such as for long URL webpage names, when coding footnotes in an article. For example: In [[digital...
Click to read more »and the previous RfA being not very long ago, in my opinion, it would be better if there is a slightly longer time span between when the issues are...
Click to read more »Why evolution, why. Elytrian - Talk 05:35, 27 July 2021 (UTC) Hello, after long discussions (and the article not really changing much any more in the last...
Click to read more »do need to discuss the issues with GA/VGA fully. It has been needed for a long time. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:51, 24 December 2022 (UTC) See...
Click to read more »line • linen • lip • liquid • list • little (less, least) • living • lock • long • look • loose • loss • loud • love • low machine • make • male • man • manager...
Click to read more »name. Thus it should be allowed to use characters not used in English so long as they are within the Roman script. The page should be moved back to 'Hồ...
Click to read more »version in the introduction. Tools for measuring textual difficulty (long words, long sentences, etc.) include: Edit Central: online readability calculators...
Click to read more »deletion was to Delete. That was 16 years ago, Macdonald-ross deleted it, 'long past'--Eptalon (talk) 16:42, 2 July 2023 (UTC) 2007 Universal Forum of Cultures...
Click to read more »Goblin 22:22, 12 September 2009 (UTC) I ♥ GoblinBots! Just as note: I'm no longer that active in the process, because I don't really like it. (Even if it...
Click to read more »wrote a really long message in response to that challenging the logic of every single point, but I don't want this to continue any longer. Do not call us...
Click to read more »eliminate them all and expect new creations to at least be a paragraph or so long. People look to encyclopedias to find information about a topic. What Nameless...
Click to read more »aren't usually this long, it nearly put me off :) - tholly --Turnip-- 08:12, 6 July 2008 (UTC) No, nominations aren't usually this long. In fact, looking...
Click to read more »account IP viewer Several adminstrator accounts have been inactive for a very long time. These pose a danger to the wiki because someone may try to guess their...
Click to read more »death. In 1934, on Adolf Hitler’s orders, he was murdered during the Night of the Long Knives. more... Other good articles – Proposals – Requirements...
Click to read more »currently not used. It is kept for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose is not clear. To talk about the subject...
Click to read more »missing (living people) is used. With articles about people who lived a long time ago, it is not unusual for information about their birth to not be known...
Click to read more »nationally by any major radio network. Has been the subject of a half-hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network. Note that members of notable...
Click to read more »rules of the other Wikipedias, where it's pretty much "anything goes" (as long as it is verifiable and notable). We should not include every last hamlet...
Click to read more »successfully passed the criteria, but that we weren't happy with. There was a long discussion, here, and we finally settled for the current criteria for very...
Click to read more »This essay explains how the long-term policy "WP:Biographies of living persons" (WP:BLP) states that material should be improved/mended and fixed first...
Click to read more »wanted to let everyone know (not sure if you remember me) that after a very long break (about five years with very rare edits to Simple Wiki) I have decided...
Click to read more »good articles to candidates for quick deletion. Some articles are quite long and have a lot of content while others are shorter (possibly stubs) and of...
Click to read more »that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped. We expect the code deployments...
Click to read more »because long-term the wretched animals do evolve and, worse still, ignorant journalists insist on using local names. I'm afraid that as long as you have...
Click to read more »Forthworth Inc - This article has significant coverage on him. Travel Talk - Long article on him and his family Hawkins Crawford - Article about his wedding...
Click to read more »is long term spam. For reference: Enwiki draft, Enwiki userpage Userpage spam 1, userpage spam 2 Oldest account I could find Nope, this is older Long term...
Click to read more »somewhat neglected task, so before we have 100,000 stubs, we should have longer, more informative articles. I hope to have at least 75 good or very good...
Click to read more »that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped. There will be code freezes...
Click to read more »is Long term abuser, and his account locked globally --Alaa :)..! 06:47, 28 April 2021 (UTC) Delete No reliable sources on the article and long-term...
Click to read more »large Simple English Compendium of Knowledge. I have been unhappy for a long time with the state of Wikipedia (it's the only SE project I'm active on):...
Click to read more »oversighter. The old method was through Special:HideRevision, which no longer works; edits hidden using the old method were permanently removed from public...
Click to read more »August 2009 (UTC) When we take a long time, nothing gets done, but if we rush it, users complain that we didn't wait long enough. 72 hours minimum? and 7...
Click to read more »Simple English, I had a problem of using making them too difficult or making long sentences to write information using simpler wording. --LauraHale (talk)...
Click to read more »lawlessness ancestor – n. a family member from the past ancient – ad. very old; long ago and – conj. also; in addition to; with anger – n. a strong emotion against...
Click to read more »has shown increased maturity and has not created any difficulties for a long time. He has a range of skills that would now benefit this wiki. I have opposed...
Click to read more »discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. QD'd Long since deprecated template that somehow missed getting deleted. -Djsasso (talk)...
Click to read more »active in over a year. Now, I am new to this site, and don't know exactly how long you are supposed to wait for inactive sysops to not come back before nominating...
Click to read more »I can't find any sources online proving that it ever existed. We've had long-term problems with hoax articles on Filipino television, especially with...
Click to read more »possibly the VGA cut (eventually). I really need some help because of how long the article is, so if you can help me get it up to GA status, that would...
Click to read more »been working on this, and as far as I can tell, the draft will remain as long as I continue to work on it. My understanding is that if I do not make any...
Click to read more »with these policies. Who has written the material should be irrelevant so long as these policies are closely adhered to. The imputation of conflict of interest...
Click to read more »currently not used. It is kept for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose is not clear. To talk about the subject...
Click to read more »been around for a long time. Real life often gets in the way, hopefully in a positive personal way. Wishing them both the best as long term valued members...
Click to read more »November 2008 (UTC) I agree, just say that global rollbackers are allowed as long they follow our rollback rules. Techman224Talk 19:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »navbox-template codings. (even with high-speed internet, large navboxes take a long time). Consider conditional-skip of text, using MediaWiki #ifeq-statements:...
Click to read more »article. The article isn't overly complicated and a clean-up wouldn't take too long. I would be happy to do it. I just don't want to do it again mid-discussion...
Click to read more »articles, or article talk page), so that Wikipedia:Simple talk does no longer show up there. Thanks. --Eptalon (talk) 10:43, 22 May 2011 (UTC) Should...
Click to read more »ist|Listaref|FootnotesSmall)[_ ]*(\||}})/gi, '{{Reflist$1'); //Replace a long version of Reflist with Reflist str = str.replace(/<div[^<>]*[...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Does this redirect have convenience ? Maybe too long to be useful. MathXplore (talk) 14:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »speedy-deleting stubs under 20 words long citing QD A1. It's ridiculous to think that we have 20,000 articles in which the stub tag is longer than the content itself...
Click to read more »Name Current text Where {{stub}} (talk) This short article can be made longer. You can help Wikipedia by adding to it. Bottom of Article {{NPOV}} (talk)...
Click to read more »As nom. Pmlineditor ∞ 17:07, 21 October 2009 (UTC) Support Has covered a long road very fast Purplebackpack89 (talk) 19:24, 21 October 2009 (UTC) Support...
Click to read more »pretty much sums it up for me. While I have no hard set in stone rule for how long, 3 months is pretty standard. -Djsasso (talk) 20:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »the editors at English Wikipedia who has been combatting the ongoing and long-term abuse by the globally blocked editor, Alec Smithson. He now edits primarily...
Click to read more »Warcraft. The article itself is definitely notable as the game and series has a long history. Warcraft: Orcs & Humans, Warcraft2: Tides of Darkness, and Warcraft3:...
Click to read more »granted on a need-to-use basis only, and will be removed once it is no longer needed. Requests for the permission should be posted to the administrators'...
Click to read more »IP addresses Range blocks IPv6 Open proxies Global locks Banning policy Long-term abuse Standard offer Related to accounts Sock puppetry Single-purpose...
Click to read more »something odd, imo. Prove that you know our rules and guidlines, wait a bit longer and you're welcome to request the tool later again. Barras talk 19:08, 9...
Click to read more »Tropical Storm Arthur was a strong tropical storm. It did not last very long. It also did not take place during the usual storm season. It affected the...
Click to read more »take both conditions above into account, merging both articles does no longer make sense. --Eptalon (talk) 21:28, 31 March 2010 (UTC) Hey, everyone! For...
Click to read more »idea, but I've thought about this for a long time and I'm pretty sure it will be an immense help in the long run to Simple. Currently, at our manual of...
Click to read more »to write and pronounce outloud. Either way, it doesn't really matter as long as we pick one and stick with it, not too difficult to create redirects from...
Click to read more »however, as a newer user, it is possible that I may be missing signs of long-term abuse. So I would ask for a second opinion in some cases especially...
Click to read more »like the other nomen dubium non-dino we just discussed: around long enough and discussed long enough that it retains some notability, even if it was not really...
Click to read more »Americans who were nomadic (people who don't live in one place for very long). They hunted American bison. In the 1500s, Spanish conquistadores came to...
Click to read more »vandal fighter for more than three months here, and he's been active for a longer time than that on the English Wikipedia. He's a very kind, nice user who...
Click to read more »let us delete such orphaned articles? -"How long, O Catiline, will you abuse our patience? And for how long will that madness of yours mock us? To what...
Click to read more »when requested, and only as long as it is needed to complete the task. This should be issued by an admin, no need for a long drawn out process here, and...
Click to read more »recent Pakistani websites talking about her, only one of them long (and the somewhat long one is a listicle). The Sophocrat (talk) 03:18, 20 May 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »which can easily be fixed. That filter shouldn't be an issue for your much longer. Again, as far as the global filter, I'm sorry, I can't help. The local...
Click to read more »these, but at least they are long enough! Yottie =talk= 07:27, 18 August 2011 (UTC) I think as long as you make them longer than just a one-liner they should...
Click to read more »il Beato Angelico (the Blessed Angelico). He has been called this for a long time, because he was thought to be blessed by God who gave him the talent...
Click to read more »well are going to get more out of images, and be more intimidated by very long unbroken lines of text. RuhiWarrior 00:32, 11 September 2007 (UTC) I think...
Click to read more »• limit • line • linen • lip • liquid • list • little • living • lock • long • look • loose • loss • loud • love • low International: latitude • lava...
Click to read more »(talk • changes) 21:19, 8 June 2010 (UTC) I agree with varying them, so long as certain groups are represented. I just think that any articles we link...
Click to read more »(UTC) A Work has me for about 48 hours... Hopefully shorter. This won't be a long break, but I won't be available for that time. NonvocalScream (talk) 04:16...
Click to read more »hopping all over the place trying to find it. But on a page, a long page like WP:NOT is (longer if you expand some of the various points) it becomes hard to...
Click to read more »information such as phone numbers, addresses and so on. It shouldn't take longer than 10 to 15 minutes until the edit is removed. Barras talk 22:54, 18 February...
Click to read more »them to the latest archives but these pages are just getting longer and longer and longer. It has made trying to navigate things a lot harder and I have...
Click to read more »not opposed to you becoming an admin, I just think you should be around longer, that is to say more edits, before doing so. -- For the other poeple who...
Click to read more »open longer? Being open longer leaves more time for supports and opposes. If anything its skewed more towards not getting OS if its open longer. -Djsasso...
Click to read more »than delete, but QD is currently redirecting the D template as well, and longer than D. Pages tagged with D are showing a redirect instead of the delete...
Click to read more »apologies for the length. I've just realised how long this actually is (Nearly 8k bytes) and it's much, much longer than I thought. Oops. Goblin 15:48, 18 December...
Click to read more »19 January 2009 (UTC) I decided to base the articles because it takes to long to write my own stuff, and I don't know what to put into my articles. TurboGolf...
Click to read more »currently not used. It is kept for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose is not clear. To talk about the subject...
Click to read more »articles with headers, references, and etc. They don't exactly have to be long articles, it could be something as simple as This You may ask on why this...
Click to read more »trust a single word of it. See en:Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Alec Smithson. The assertion that Bestetti "has long been the only pupil of the painter Giorgio...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Page very messy and too long, not good manual of style, plot summary too long. Hockeycatcat (talk) 09:28, 29 August 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »article's talk page. Because the process of becoming a very good article is long, larger edits (beyond spellchecking/link-fixing) to current very good articles...
Click to read more »would be a better option. Under general, it also applies to user pages (as long as it isn't offensive, put what you want there), User talk (we get a good...
Click to read more »(though maybe on the named account). It would be a slow build up of longer and longer blocks toping out at the typical 1 year max for an IP that isn't a...
Click to read more »that even WP:FA featured articles are often quite long, and the appropriate way to shorten a long article would be to split into sub-articles, or move...
Click to read more »because when pages get too long, it becomes harder to read. Small details make articles longer. The English articles are so long that even if you used simple...
Click to read more »that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped. There will be code freezes...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's article is far too long. I simply don't have the time to learn how to play the game by reading such a long article. Therefore, can someone...
Click to read more »possible to follow these rules without writing a long article. Two sentences will do fine for a good stub--as long as they're two good sentences. The extra thought...
Click to read more »and is a stuffed toy.His eyes are black,and his tail is very very short.He is a giraffe only due to his looks,but his neck is not as long as a giraffe's...
Click to read more »to be expanded by us, but as long as it covers what most feel are generally the key points of the subject, it is no longer a stub. Very vague and up to...
Click to read more »think Eye is a good place to start. And Majorly: So I can make stubs, as long as they're not one-liners? Because I made a few yesterday, just following...
Click to read more »to really need that... What would all those admins do if they could no longer delete ip-vandal created articles? --Eptalon (talk) 10:08, 20 May 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »maxim to be angry? *is shot* (I've been wanting to make a maxim joke for a long time). Cassandra (talk) 05:12, 15 June 2008 (UTC) Thank god it's not a joke...
Click to read more »without getting emotional about it which in my mind is what leads to our long and emotional discussions that go nowhere. Talking about it, trying to find...
Click to read more »protect it at all. Since there's no related log, it must have been protected a long time ago. Liangent (talk) 16:57, 25 June 2010 (UTC) Done. However, I am...
Click to read more »&&&&&&&&&&&&2552.&&&&&02,552 articles is listed here. Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at Wikipedia:Proposed...
Click to read more »step might be to tone down the language; What I am saying is that in the long run we will need people who know the situation better. This might really...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of changes is no longer being updated. This is because the bot that used to do it, BOTijo, was run by emijrp, who...
Click to read more »worked on it there. Beware of long, complex pages! They can take a huge amount of work, and often the enWP original is far longer and more detailed than we...
Click to read more »currently not used. It is kept for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose is not clear. To talk about the subject...
Click to read more »that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped. There will be code freezes...
Click to read more »four wars in Ancient Greece. A list of all wars in history would be too long for a single page. Batrachoseps (talk) 00:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »small changes that are helpful and often maintenance actions. Too cut a long-story short I am beginning to lean towards banning anon editing; sadly so...
Click to read more »December 2009 (UTC) Support As I said last time, all the drama we had is long gone, and BG7 continues to be one of our most active and most dedicated editors...
Click to read more »am actually surprised and perhaps disgusted that this hasn't happened a long time ago. -Djsasso (talk) 18:32, 31 December 2008 (UTC) Support Disruptive...
Click to read more »not that A-word) after my name, So despite that, whenever I've been her long enough and written enough, I would like to be an admin to stop that when...
Click to read more »stability and user experience of the maps service. In addition, a question about long-term support for the maps service was recently settled, and a small team...
Click to read more »short road in Dutchess County, New York. The highway is 6.19 miles (9.96 km) long. It goes through mostly rural areas, and is usually used as a shortcut from...
Click to read more »algebra, an advanced math topic that was getting a lot of press not too long ago. I'd offer to write it myself but I don't even know where to begin to...
Click to read more »December 2017 (UTC) How is it not valid? Is it not a county in Wyoming? As long as it is, then it is a valid article. -DJSasso (talk) 13:21, 31 December...
Click to read more »that everyone can agree to. I don't really care what it is *too* much as long as it doesn't change very often. Computer Fizz (talk) 16:20, 17 September...
Click to read more »Generally speaking, most modern style guides recommend one space. Here's a long discussion about it: [1]. Zagalejo (talk) 23:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC) I add...
Click to read more »our guidelines. I gave you one minute, but you've been an admin for far longer. Synergy 00:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC) Personally I think it was the wrong...
Click to read more »absolutely basic to the arts. When you try and replace "mixed reviews" with a long circumlocution, it runs against almost all the published advice on how to...
Click to read more »believes that the use of Caucasian is precise and favors getting rid of it as long as the African-American actors category was gone as well. The question is...
Click to read more »any good reason put forth why it should be longer than 2 weeks. Per my original statement: "but no longer than 2 weeks from the original block date" (see...
Click to read more »hundreds, or perhaps low thousands are likely not what you can use to write long articles about. --Eptalon (talk) 18:03, 17 November 2020 (UTC) Yes even cities...
Click to read more »attempt at promo. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:26, 27 November 2020 (UTC) DElete a long since globally blocked loser creating hoaxes. Praxidicae (talk) 15:49, 2...
Click to read more »don't delete articles based on their creators, this one fails WP:GNG by a long shot. Absolutely no coverage at all. --IWI (talk) 19:46, 23 September 2020...
Click to read more »but many of us coders like things to line up. Are you worried about how long the template takes to execute?--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 16:19, 8 March...
Click to read more »grape juice does not stay in contact with the skins, seeds, or pulp for a long time. The colour can be straw-yellow, yellow-green, or yellow-gold. Alcoholic...
Click to read more »for "Discussions that may change the way this wikipedia works", and no longer have these on simple talk. What do you think? --Eptalon (talk) 12:58, 25...
Click to read more »I have to tell you, I am sick to death of this individual. English has a long-term vandal of nearly five years nicknamed "MascotGuy." His idiosyncracies...
Click to read more »involved people stated already their opinion and there was no reason to wait longer. I don’t have any kind of trust in him. The mentioned issues on his last...
Click to read more »not use abbreviations. We can have redirects that use abbreviations, as long as they're not ambiguous. --Auntof6 (talk) 01:22, 4 September 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »because to be fair, who uses them? Putting links on talk pages could link to long dead users who operate empty projects. 💠Ely - Talk💠 06:26, 13 March 2022...
Click to read more »someday I think you need more time here. I don't think you've been here long enough.-- † ChristianMan16 15:18, 4 October 2008 (UTC) Can you point to...
Click to read more »old problems with infoboxes and some other copied en data. After way to long I discovered this is because we really don't have the entire template, we...
Click to read more »about medical. Wikipedia's current policy is to include such content, as long as it does not break any of our policies (especially Neutral point of view)...
Click to read more »do not turn it around fast enough, I doubt that we will be around much longer. If I do not think that we are going to get any better, I might just have...
Click to read more »linked/changed if I move them over? I've been away from simple.wiki for long enough that I'm not really sure what "counts" as simple anymore. I won't...
Click to read more »that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped. There will be code freezes...
Click to read more »doing it since I got here like 5 years ago and I am sure it was happening long before I arrived. -DJSasso (talk) 13:08, 21 February 2013 (UTC) It's currently...
Click to read more »will no long be tracked as uncategorized by default. Unless the {{uncat}} tag is used (which is rare at best) these articles can be lost for a long time...
Click to read more »consider blocking and deleting pages created by 31.190.195.83: Long-term abuse, see en:Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Alec Smithson (global block already requested)...
Click to read more »16:34, 1 May 2010 (UTC) Q: What are the effects of protected a page too long, or protected too many pages? A: This sends a message to users that Wikipedia...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC) Not done We only give this right to very long term editors of this wiki who are not already admins. Your options are to...
Click to read more »passes that i'm running for in the early new year, but can we wait that long? BG7even 21:56, 22 December 2008 (UTC) I'd be happy to file the bug if needed...
Click to read more »question. IS it okay? Prime Contributer (talk) 07:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC) As long as it doesn't start a floodgate of similar requests, which I seriously doubt...
Click to read more »directly from the source and pasting it here is perfectly acceptable, as long as you attribute the source with its URL or a hypertext link. Correcting...
Click to read more »currently not used. It is kept for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose is not clear. To talk about the subject...
Click to read more »articles on Simple English Wikipedia, articles that would likely taken a lot longer to make it from English Wikipedia to Simple English Wikipedia. I have also...
Click to read more »Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Extremely long title that no one would search for, unnecessary redirect. Hockeycatcat (talk)...
Click to read more »that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped. There will be a code...
Click to read more »want to import a lot of them.) I believe you'll try, but it takes a much longer time and effort than might be imagined to properly simplify and clean up...
Click to read more »process fashion an article up to our standards eventually. And if it takes a long time for that process to work, so what? Wikipedia is a work in progress,...
Click to read more »long as the {{icon}} template stays the same. That is my compromise. Cheers, obentomusubi 03:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC) I will be fine with that so long...
Click to read more »accounts. I just though admins should take this into account before giving long bans to ips or accounts of this user. F S M 13:13, 21 August 2008 (UTC) I...
Click to read more »stub-sentence. For example, I think being is better than Causality. I think long and complex are worse than simple and basic stubs. -- AmericanEagle (talk)...
Click to read more »an orphaned article is hard, and the orphaned article might stay so for a long time. Angela Maureen (talk) 18:45, 8 May 2019 (UTC) People can add that tag...
Click to read more »22:51, 3 June 2011 (UTC) I'd block on duck. Snow fun at alls CU data is all long expired so unless a CU kept a personal copy a CU won't be much help. -DJSasso...
Click to read more »saying we need more admins. and i slowly feel the backlogs getting longer and longer. Computer Fizz (talk) 04:24, 10 September 2019 (UTC) Often people...
Click to read more »might find unsimple pages. They might find pages that are too short or too long. They might find pages that are not fun to read. They might find pages that...
Click to read more »you think? Cheers, Razorflame 14:59, 5 March 2009 (UTC) A decent idea as long as there is sufficient interest from the community in doing this. Right now...
Click to read more »should be no different. It's not something that needs much discussion; as long as it gives the same message, we don't need too much discussion about it...
Click to read more »retiring is only meant for someone who is leaving for good (or an extremely long time, not in your case), show a bad problem of indecisiveness, which I wouldn't...
Click to read more »a cull. Lee Vilenski (talk) 18:11, 15 July 2020 (UTC) Delete - absurdly long spam article. IWI (chat) 18:14, 15 July 2020 (UTC) Keep - The article was...
Click to read more »feasibility study by a scientific research institute, for using Wikidata in the long-term goal as an open Artificial Intelligence for improving quality of Wikipedia...
Click to read more »button on wikis where the Citoid service is enabled. The team has released a long-desired improvement to the handling of non-existent images. If a non-existent...
Click to read more »Adelaideslement8723 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Long title and a hoax aticle. 𝓐𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓲𝓭𝓮 (𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴 ♡ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓼) 02:04...
Click to read more »show which notable people have had long lives. Jim Michael (talk) 19:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC) What determines how long a life is notable? --Auntof6 (talk)...
Click to read more »article should be at least 3,000 characters and at least about 300 words long. Only characters/words in the text count. Characters do not count if they...
Click to read more »Weasel words may constitute sentence stuffing: they may make a sentence longer without carrying any information. Passive voice. Though it is possible to...
Click to read more »talk // ☯ // 06:39, 13 May 2010 (UTC) I know that if an article's really long I scroll to the bottom just to see how big it is. (And some aren't at the...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. A long forgotten project--Peterdownunder (talk) 13:33, 12 June 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. A long forgotten project --Peterdownunder (talk) 13:39, 12 June 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »simple adjectives used in the English language. Form Size Large Small Length Long Short Thick Narrow Deep Flat Whole Direction Low High Place Near Far Gone...
Click to read more »personal gain. He has been an active user on here for a long time, and throughout this long time, I believe, has helped this site out more than many...
Click to read more »• right changes) End date: 29 August 2009 Candidate Statement: I have a long track record of using tools in an appropriate manner here and on en. I believe...
Click to read more »short time, all things considered. While James hasn't been a sysop for much longer, I think he has the benefit of extensive cross-wiki anti-vandalism work...
Click to read more »Majorly talk 21:55, 11 October 2009 (UTC) Soup Dish has been doing this for a long time; some action must be taken. Pmlineditor ∞ 11:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »uncensored, as long as they don't put in detailed facts or real photographs. ♥ Belinda ♥ 05:14, 25 March 2010 (UTC) I think detailed facts, as long as they're...
Click to read more »especially with dynamic IP ranges? Some IP talk pages are getting quite long with warnings dating back to 2006, and i'm not entirely sure vandals will...
Click to read more »much space in the editing page. Especially anything that is over one line long. Anyone with similar sentiments? --TBC 04:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC) One line...
Click to read more »16:24, 17 December 2009 (UTC) However, Mount Everest has been covered for longer, and more coverage than any footballer I can think of. Go to Google Images...
Click to read more »watchlist. Changes since the last time I looked at a page are no longer in bold. There's no longer a button to mark all pages visited. Has anyone heard if these...
Click to read more »copyrighted, but I do not agree to this claim and the necessity to add a super long speech text to here. The speech texts matches to this website. I would like...
Click to read more »(Unindenting) The loading time has definitely decreased, but it can take as long as 40 seconds sometimes. Chenzw (talk ▪ changes) 04:03, 8 April 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. As long as there are no objections... Osiris (talk) 06:14, 19 November 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »with many of your signatures, and those of a number of other people, but as long as they follow policy there is nothing to be done about it. I certainly would...
Click to read more »from those articles with a very short introduction followed by a long table and/or long, complex infoboxes. The introduction by itself (if simply phrased)...
Click to read more »to now, you'd see I've learned and matured a lot since then. A year is a long time. Meetare Shappy Cunkelfratz! 20:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC) Amen :) Razorflame...
Click to read more »point where my articles are too simple? I always worry if my plots are too long (Die Hard 2, X2 come to mind) and now, whether they are too simple. I could...
Click to read more »language barriers AI can be used on talk pages and community discussions as long as certain rules are followed. Users may use AI to translate their own text...
Click to read more »"Municipalities in" would likely be the most accurate format, but it is just a tad too long, "Cities in" tends to work out best in my opinion. -- Creol(talk) 17:25,...
Click to read more »automated scale, which doesn't seem to be the case now I am looking into it. As long as a page demonstrates some kind of significance past the A4 threshold (which...
Click to read more »he can. One doesn't necessarily need loads of QDs and reports to ViP; as long as the candidate knows and has a clear history (which Djsasso does), there...
Click to read more »would be a good idea to remove their tools, as they haven't used them in a long time. Kennedy (talk) 09:52, 23 April 2009 (UTC) I thought that we said a...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete undisclosed paid-for spam, long term abuse, see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xenen1970. MER-C (talk)...
Click to read more »site, I feel uncomfortable reopening an RfD that has been closed for so long. Please let me know if you would be willing to take another look at these...
Click to read more »for Miss Tate. Obviously, voice actors have long lists of work done. Many not notable people can point to long lists of work. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:52...
Click to read more »become a administrator in simple english. I understand I haven't been in here long or haven't have that many edits but I think you guys need a little more help...
Click to read more »row may cause the whole map to stretch too wide because there is some very long Comment text in another row regardless whether the main text and note 1 cells...
Click to read more »meet the following criteria: It should be longer than 3-4 sentences. Ideally it should be one screen or longer (ie. over 5k-10k article size) It should...
Click to read more »Special:NewPages is no longer highlighting unpatrolled pages for me. Is anyone else seeing the same thing? I can see which ones are unpatrolled by hiding...
Click to read more »went to the wedding as Thumb's best man. He stayed away from women for a long time after the wedding. In 1879, he married Lilian Elston of Redwood City...
Click to read more »that should surely be protected for longer or shorter terms. However, a recent example I think that is simply too long for a protection against recreation...
Click to read more »to blocking and that he is not entitled to one because he has been here a long time and no one else has said anything. You may be interested in this particular...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy due to long term abuse as spam. Been dealing with this editor cross-wiki for quite awhile...
Click to read more »and the update would be easier - no fuss about which hook to remove or how long it had been there or whether or not there was balance in the topics covered...
Click to read more »mentioned on its page. It is also significantly long, with much known information. In addition, it is longer and has more refs then most of the articles on...
Click to read more »been active as an editor. The latest edit being on 09:09, 10 October 2009, long after the one prior. In fact, Huji is currently listed as a semi-active (or...
Click to read more »tagged for no source in April 2012. (2 1/2 years ago?) I think that is a long long time ago. This situation does not reflect well on sewp at all. ciao!!...
Click to read more »close request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A long list of almost all red links; serves no purpose for readers. Should be moved...
Click to read more »09:28, 4 July 2007 (UTC) Support - Simon hasn't been around for a really long time, and Brion can just give it to himself if he needs to. Sean William...
Click to read more »Bluegoblin7 (talk · contribs) End date: 21 July 2009, 18:30UTC Ok, i've thought about it long and hard for the past few days, and i've decided to give an RfA a go, also...
Click to read more »option of telling users not to use such terms with you and I believe they no longer do. We are under no obligation to review this ban, you are correct, but...
Click to read more »More infoboxes, perhaps 1-10,000 or remove existing ones or watch and wait longer Success criteria No existing editor at Simple English Wikipedia gains a...
Click to read more »been made, and I've seen several threads archived long before the last post has been made that long ago. Can an uninvolved neutral user please archive...
Click to read more »how long the block should be in the discussion (though there was consensus to HAVE a block) having the blocking admin decide when it had been long enough...
Click to read more »cause trauma, talking about his mistakes in the past (they happened a very long time ago, and I (and most bright people) have not seen anything similar here...
Click to read more »the 2010 page under the subheading Deaths, the other is a separate much longer article called Deaths in 2010 which is linked from the 2010 page. Many of...
Click to read more »close request BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A long list with no sources. Fails GNG and there aren't any other claims. Looks...
Click to read more »July) that most people think the longer stubs should be kept and that sub-stubs should be redirected to a list (as long as the teams are not of historical...
Click to read more »{{Habesha peoples}} probably some more long term abuse, but needs an admin eye. Nunabas (talk) 01:20, 6 July 2022 (UTC) Since when do templates get a crap...
Click to read more »concern is that the other people involved are gonna be over here before long as well. I am usually in favour of second chances for banned users on EN...
Click to read more »reason for deletion any longer. --Eptalon 15:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC) closing as kept since the original criterion for deletion no longer applies. Blockinblox...
Click to read more »it shown in the block logs. I would consider this to be long-term abuse and thus think a long-term (6 months to a year) soft block may be warranted. ·...
Click to read more »disruption. Chenzw Talk 07:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC) I'm sorry? For how long? TurboGolf 07:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Chenzw, I understand where you are...
Click to read more »with speculation, 19th century oil pictures of the first Thanksgiving, and long paragraphs about the uncomfortable conditions on the Mayflower. Oregonian2012...
Click to read more »was to Keep. First, being short is not a reason to delete an article as long as notability is shown. Second, for geographical places, the fact that they...
Click to read more »become more active. Razorflame 19:00, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Support – as long as he becomes a bit more active, I fully trust him for the tool. TheAE talk...
Click to read more »Does no one have any comment on the original question? Have I not waited long enough for responses? Would anyone have a problem if I just be bold and pick...
Click to read more »2373 pages without any interwiki links at all. This can lead to a lot of long hard hours hunting these links down. On the plus side, after an hour or two...
Click to read more »Account (and its many socks) blocked for crosswiki disruption (ja.wikipedia Long Term Abuse) Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:40, 25 March 2012 (UTC) User:恋のプロバイダ...
Click to read more »are quickly blamed is because they clearly wrote angry remarks, and in the long run, the various users must co-exist, and if the victims are fewer then they...
Click to read more »Just a thought. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 19:36, 5 March 2010 (UTC) Not as long as they edit here without being disruptive. fr33kman 19:48, 5 March 2010...
Click to read more »and my own talk page. I think a block is in order but I want to know how long other users think the block should extend until, since an indef block isn't...
Click to read more »on the covers in addition. Copying with changes limited to the covers, as long as they preserve the title of the Document and satisfy these conditions,...
Click to read more »opinion is that a block with a time limit - but a rather long one - should be given, as a sort of long wikibreak for CR90 to cool and think carefully over...
Click to read more »long per each type of protection? A:Protection should be set for a few days, however if it continues after being unprotected, it should be set longer...
Click to read more »The IP who began this request for deletion has been globally blocked for long-term abuse. However, I took a look at the article and it is a hoax, so I...
Click to read more »use of helpboxes provides rapid, brief information to users, especially to long-term users who might have forgotten some of many options encapsulated into...
Click to read more »(UTC) Anyone else who wants to help organize and judge may feel free too, as long as it doesn't impede with development and simplification of articles. But...
Click to read more »2012 (UTC) I unprotected RFP earlier because it had long term protection applied that was no longer needed. And, it appears to be causing issues with certain...
Click to read more »fact that its a long ass world. --Huik01 (talk) 22:46, 27 December 2009 (UTC) Umm... that's not a valid reason. Just because a word is long doesn't mean...
Click to read more »don't notice so they don't go and watchlist the split out page and then no longer get the notifications they want and effectively are cut from the discussion...
Click to read more »short sentences as you falsely claim, but in proper coverage and fairly long explanations that is enough for Simple English Wikipedia. Etcnoel1 (talk)...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete per nom and en:Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Bertrand101. Chenzw Talk 02:50, 12 July 2014 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »Please do not modify it. Like Phroziac, I haven't been here at Simple very long, but I am an admin at English and User:Phroziac was kind enough to elevate...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Part of a long-going PR spam. BRP ever 11:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »Wikimedia. The concept of Wikizine: Wikizine is short so it does not take long to read. If possible every topic is only a very short summary. There are...
Click to read more »back we gave User:Razorflame the importer right. At the moment, he is no longer active on the project. I request removal of the right with the side note...
Click to read more »(UTC) Sounds fine to me, as long as we think we won't change those again. (I seem to remember them being changed not too long ago.) In the meantime, I have...
Click to read more »overview of what I have included: I have started recording reverts for a long time already, but recording 1RR incidents only started in late-Jan this year...
Click to read more »(formerly Classical Esther) for adminship. I'm not going to make this a long nomination because I firmly believe that her actions and commitment speak...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Delete. QD'd as spam/advertisement by long-term abuse.-BRP ever 12:15, 15 April 2022 (UTC) DC Themmie (edit · talk ·...
Click to read more »February 2021 (UTC) It depends on how long the Arabian peninsula page is supposed to be. If the article gets 5 times longer would that be too much history there...
Click to read more »22:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC) Oppose, but only because you haven't been here long enough, in my opinion. Three months, and I'll gladly vote support for you...
Click to read more »June 2012 (UTC) You can certainly use an article from another Wikipedia, as long as you "translate" it (simplify it) and provide attribution to the original...
Click to read more »Please provide as detailed as possible a description of what you were trying to do. Incomplete reports may take a longer time to be processed....
Click to read more »–Juliancolton | Talk 17:16, 28 November 2009 (UTC) Support because the war was over long ago. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC) Support - Because...
Click to read more »as vandalism/not notable (by me) but has been remade and as such is no longer QD candidate but requires RfD now to delete it. No google hits at all for...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC) No. Any article is welcome here, as long as the subject is notable and the content simple english.--Bärliner 19:32...
Click to read more »leave? Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 22:05, 14 March 2009 (UTC) It's a long story, yes. ѕwirlвoy ₪ 22:16, 14 March 2009 (UTC) I'm not doing anything...
Click to read more »could cause havoc, I think this is the best opportunity we will have in a long time to really help change Simple Wiki in a good way. Yottie =talk= 13:17...
Click to read more »Therefore, I think that this disruption constitutes a longer block than a few days. I believe a long-term hard block is in order for this range. Razorflame...
Click to read more »what a "ban" is - so I think that the very workings of blocks and bans are long from sorted and stable. That's just my 2 cents worth, anyway. Lingamondo...
Click to read more »@Castilibrary2: is this “64.62.148.194–254” range itself static? For how long time does your ISP offer you IPs from this namely interval? Incnis Mrsi (talk)...
Click to read more »hand active with the tools. I appreciate the history I have but its been a long while and I hope my actions have proved I am committed to the cause. I have...
Click to read more »Wikipedia has previously included such warnings in some articles, but no longer does so, except for the content disclaimer and section headings (such as...
Click to read more »would need a major rewrite to become encyclopedic - it's currently a very long plot section. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 18:24, 13 January 2021 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Keep. Closing a bit early to shrink our long list. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:11, 28 June 2014 (UTC) Terry stop (edit · talk...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Keep. Closing a bit early to shink our long list. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:24, 28 June 2014 (UTC) Sin tax (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Keep. Closing a bit early to shrink our long list. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:13, 28 June 2014 (UTC) Takfiri (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Delete. No prejudice against recreation, as long as it has a use. Osiris (talk) 14:51, 18 January 2016 (UTC) Template:Universal...
Click to read more »before you do it. Just adding a few words as part of a quotation is fine, as long as you make it clear whose words they are to avoid plagiarism. Do not copy...
Click to read more »as long as enwiki's; i.e. they are only separate on the enwiki due to the long nature of en:U.S. state. Generally, I think we should only split long articles;...
Click to read more »:) TheAE talk 20:43, 23 April 2009 (UTC) Support. Hasn't been here very long, but should not cause any harm as an administrator. Best of luck, Malinaccier...
Click to read more »--Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 14:58, 11 November 2015 (UTC) As long as you are aware that Enwiki uses a slightly different standard of notability...
Click to read more »edits after the voting starts for VGAs is likely to cause the article to no longer apply as it fails the criteria that the last few changes should be minor...
Click to read more »count should only be a secondary consideration, I think that exactly how long a person has been editing here should also be secondary. This goes for Eptalon...
Click to read more »per nominator. I actually wanted to nominate this earlier, but it was not long after the article was created, so I wanted to give the creator more time...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: QD A1/G1 requested but long enough to avoid A1, and somewhat makes sense. Although no references except...
Click to read more »User:206500369 Archer7 16:08, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Roberto goes on a fairly long vandalism spree, mostly consisting of changing the Main Page to add some...
Click to read more »good. I should just be a sheep and accept that Rfa is now a vote and no longer a discussion. I shall remember that. -Djsasso (talk) 16:58, 23 July 2009...
Click to read more »categories, and the names have been carefully chosen, but some are very long. Each category is listed below with the live count of pages (refresh): Category:Pages...
Click to read more »templates aren't part of that system and, as far as I can tell, are no longer regularly used in keeping track of conflicts. Osiris (talk) 12:50, 8 November...
Click to read more »working on, but there is no reason not to do any that are very old with a long inactive user. Unlike en we don't have a Mfd location to delete this sort...
Click to read more »we need it—and apparently they don't—I don't think we need to keep it, as long as Chenzw's caveat is observed. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:07, 11 April 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »you! Darubrub (Let me know) 00:14, 27 May 2021 (UTC) Done. You've waited long enough and have enough experience, and rollback isn't that big of a deal...
Click to read more »its subject is notable. On a side note, the creator of the article is a long-term abuser. Ahmadtalk 01:53, 16 April 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »reason for this RfD aren't valid. I think religious concepts are notable as long as they're real, which this one is. I don't see any non-neutral point of...
Click to read more »of the subject. The sources in the article aren't widespread and having long impact. I would say this is way too soon. en:Wikipedia:Notability#SBST perfectly...
Click to read more »the reason: Looks like both a notability problem and also the work of a long time vandal Peterdownunder (talk) 20:41, 1 January 2018 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »work, DYK, community discussions and RFD. Admittedly there was a time of long inactivity, but most of us have had those and Philiosopher's activity level...
Click to read more »they have time to check all your edits. It may have been missed due to the long request after it. -DJSasso (talk) 18:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC) 92.12.208...
Click to read more »made count as long as they are made before the closing. There might be cases where 'crats intentionally keep requests open for longer. I've closed this...
Click to read more »deletion was to Delete. Speedily as a hoax without prejudice to recreation so long as the content is sourced. Vermont (talk) 17:44, 7 October 2019 (UTC) Jordan...
Click to read more »with your browser settings maybe? Archer7 - talk 11:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Long story short: I try to simplify a MediaWiki page (diff 1), and edit is reverted...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. This RfD has ran long over, and with arguments for and against keeping this article. At this time...
Click to read more »days is only a minimum, deletions often stay up longer. No need to post here everytime they go long. -DJSasso (talk) 11:43, 21 December 2017 (UTC) Asssseatwer...
Click to read more »though some more article percent would be great. I'm sorry I can't make a long review, but there really isn't anything that important that you haven't done...
Click to read more »exclusively used by one vandal on Simple Wikipedia since November 2019. This is a long term vandal who changes birth dates, locations, and other BLP info related...
Click to read more »count) (assign permissions) I have had the Rollback access on en-Wiki for a long and [edit:NON]contentious period, and made hundreds of productive reverts...
Click to read more »17:04, 29 November 2011 (UTC) Delete - As I recall, there was some talk a long while back about trying to add a few portals and see how well they work on...
Click to read more »You're bringing in a matter which belongs at AN, not here. Honestly, making long, deriding monologues about people who oppose your is just a waste of time...
Click to read more »consensus to keep this article. Also the article has been improved and is no longer that short. -Barras talk 15:39, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 7 Seconds (change...
Click to read more »deletion/Requests/2020/Joseph Kargbo too and has been spammed multiple times, this is long-term spam. Joseph kargbo junior (edit · talk · history · links · watch ·...
Click to read more »been verified, and you want to delete it, why don't you help me verify the long-lived author? ~2025-27866-79 (talk) 15:06, 6 October 2025 (UTC) Why delete...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Non-notable person, created by an xwiki spammer from long ago. Has no significant coverage and does not meet any type of N criteria...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, known cross-wiki long-term spammer. CptViraj (talk) 10:22, 8 November 2020 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:42, 3 October 2013 (UTC) Delete. Comment: enwiki has a very long article on this song. Oregonian2012 (talk) 13:18, 3 October 2013 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Article about a meme; I don't think meme's are long-lived enough, or universal enough to be included here; propose deleting....
Click to read more »eurodyne (talk) 22:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC) Delete as lacking notability. Long para in plaintext looks like a copy-paste, and is not encyclopedic. Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »or "delete", such as merging. Delete - Nothing encycolpedic about 10-15 long tables!, Doesn't exist on EN as obviously non notable. –Davey2010Talk 23:45...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:47, 8 July 2014 (UTC) Delete per nom and en:Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Bertrand101. Chenzw Talk 02:52, 12 July 2014 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »about to initiate an ER on myself when I saw this. I've known you for a long time now (about 6 months), and I have to say I have no complaints. You do...
Click to read more »They never worked in the field of chemistry and died 40 years later after a long writing career with many books about coins. Are they a chemist? My reasoning...
Click to read more »16:25, 31 July 2010 (UTC) PeterSymonds (talk) 18:07, 31 July 2010 (UTC) As long he can provide ID to the foundation I'll Support —I-20the highway 19:30,...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. After a long thought, there is really no use keeping this. There are now 130-odd pages...
Click to read more »then the explanation and I don't know is a totally acceptable answer in the long run. Q: What is the difference between a block and a ban? A: Blocks are made...
Click to read more »tagged for no source in April 2012. (2 1/2 years ago?) I think that is a long long time ago. This situation does not reflect well on sewp at all. ciao!!...
Click to read more »article. Reads like an advertisement. Likely paid article by user with a long history of writing paid articles. Blissyu2 (talk) 01:30, 8 December 2021...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. No content, and a long time dead. Macdonald-ross (talk) Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:05, 7 July 2014...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Speedy delete under G4, was already RFD'ed not too long ago: Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requests/2020/Rahul_Ahuja. This request...
Click to read more »request Agrave Banks has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Long and hard to navigate list - clearly a WP:NOT page that doesn't fit under...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. MERGE with Victory Day. This is far too long a title for anyone to be interested in. The usable content can be merged...
Click to read more »BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Created by a long term abuser but it looks like the event exists but isn't notable. Since this...
Click to read more »notable enough for inclusion. Furthermore, the bulk of the article is a long quote from another source. Yottie =talk= 18:37, 23 June 2020 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. Falls a long way short. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »January 20th. I have been dedicating myself to helping this Wikipedia for a long time now. I know that I still don't have 3 months of experience, but I really...
Click to read more »copyright violation, cobbled together passages from [1] and [2], each of which long pre-date the page here. DMacks (talk) 15:02, 22 November 2022 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »had the crat support before you placed this up because the community no longer !votes on it unless they fail to get the crat support needed. I would also...
Click to read more »with. Avoid making the article a directory of past winners. If the list is long, it belongs in a separate list article. If another article exists for the...
Click to read more »exact same... It is a story that will stay with me for a long time, This story stayed with me long after I turned the last page. This moment was particularly...
Click to read more »reason to check a user. Note that alternative accounts are not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of the policies (for example, to vote more...
Click to read more »research, writing and copyediting, filling red links, and simplifying the very long and complex topic, I feel it's ready to be reviewed. Comments, thoughts and...
Click to read more »articles related to Asia, new ones not expansion, 3500 chars, 200 words long, properly simplified and having references for all content and no maintenance...
Click to read more »12 July 2013 (UTC) Support- Bluegoblin7 has been around this wiki for a long time, and at times has been a coloful and controversial character. He has...
Click to read more »merging. Delete road is not notable. --IWI (talk) 15:23, 22 August 2020 (UTC) Long-term abuse Naleksuh (talk) 00:36, 24 August 2020 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »it is also high-maintenance, and will likely not be kept up to date for long. So... delete... Eptalon (talk) 21:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »Speedily kept per consensus and due to the fact that reason for deletion is no longer valid. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 16:03, 1 April 2011 (UTC) Category:Cleaning...
Click to read more »decided to run for Crat. Now, I know I have not been an editor here for that long, but I am hoping my other qualities (active, article creator, initator of...
Click to read more »domain value and activity (registered nearly 20 years ago) also demonstrate long-term significance and verifiability. Therefore, CubeFace Crypto meets the...
Click to read more »interwiki links (before wikidata comes into place) are inactive for quite a long period of time. For those who have active operators, I am less concerned...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This was created bya long-term hoaxer, Krabs502 - see [1] and [2]. Consequently, the information given...
Click to read more »tools. Meetare Shappy Cunkelfratz! 12:05, 10 May 2009 (UTC) I've thought long and hard this afternoon. As BG7 talked about switching votes, I hate to have...
Click to read more »Fnafpuppetmaster (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions) After a long and well-needed wikibreak, I have decided to return, and with that, I would...
Click to read more »happened until I make an edit as it shows me logged in until I edit. I have long since set up a virtual machine to edit wikipedia from when I am in the various...
Click to read more »