Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following one or more categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! What is Wikipedia? Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that is written by many of its readers. It is a special type...
Click to read more »en:Wikipedia:Automated taxobox system/intro This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »was to Delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:06, 23 May 2023 (UTC) Help:Get Help/Intro (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request...
Click to read more »Page Template:Intro to single/styles.css has no content. title lead top left image left1 left2 right image right1 right2 bottom Documentationcreatepurge...
Click to read more »Page Template:Intro to single/styles.css has no content. A quarter century of free knowledge On 15 January 2026, Wikipedia celebrated the 25th anniversary...
Click to read more »gallery and subject are v. notable. The text below the intro looks to be mainly rubbish. Suggest keep intro only. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:10, 3 November 2021...
Click to read more »feeling ambitious enough to copy over the en. article intro and simplify it. It is a large intro or I would have just done that myself. It would also need...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Intro reads like a press-relase, ands Wikipedia is not a company directory--Eptalon...
Click to read more »been deleted from Hindi Wikipedia, there's a text with at least the same intro at EverybodyWiki. If recreated, needs to be clearer, and also needs to clearly...
Click to read more »as simple as bolding the first appearance of the subjects title in the intro. {{Stub}} - for all stubs that can not fit into any stub we have {{List-stub}}...
Click to read more »December 2022 (UTC) More on the refernces: #1 is attached to the intro name.. as the intros name is identical to the page title, there is nothing there to...
Click to read more »tab. Apart from this piece, which is an interview (explains the laudatory intro), I am not seeing any notable coverage of the subject. — Infogapp1 (talk)...
Click to read more »merging. I'm very interested as to why there is a massive red link at the intro. I agree though, significance is questionable. Orashmatash (t • c) 00:38...
Click to read more »such as merging. Keep I've replaced the LLM generated contents with the intro sentence from enwiki, and made sure it's categorized as a music stub. Ravensfire...
Click to read more »--Ferien (talk) 07:57, 22 February 2023 (UTC) @Rjjiii: If you copies over the intro directly from the English version, it would most likely be quick deleted...
Click to read more »enwp, without much simplification (QD:A3). Originally, I had taken the intro of he enwp article, and simplified it. I did more simplifications today...
Click to read more »there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. The intro and premise section are an en: copy/paste of en:Zip Zip with the refs stripped...
Click to read more »housekeeping, but the article is literally copied straight up from enwiki (see intro from the enwiki and compare it). It has little editing done to it. RiggedMint...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:38, 17 February 2025 (UTC) I have copied the EnWP intro, with slight adaptations. I think what we currentlyy have is keepable.--Eptalon...
Click to read more »17:16, 6 July 2014 (UTC) I extended it a little, copying over some of the intro of the enwp page, and simplifying it. I think it is now more than a dicdef...
Click to read more »sections (20th century/21st century, consisting of 3-4 sentences. A blurb or intro of 2-3 sentences, a few images and a related pages where the relation is...
Click to read more »article (§ion=0) can be edited separately for much faster update of the intro text (right-click top option "my settings" then in the box named "Editing"...
Click to read more »and 2465 episodes ( 190 ep/year, 4-5 seasons a year, 40 ep/season per the intro). It also only has 3 season and 3622 episodes ( 1 season every 4 year, 280...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Quick delete With the exception of 3 links, the intro and infobox are a character for character copy of the English article. It...
Click to read more »Notable TV programme fr33kman 14:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC) Delete while the intro seems accurate, the latter info all seems to be a hoax. There is no indiction...
Click to read more »and paste to remove the parts completely without context; this leaves an intro and history section. Someone not familiar with us history will still have...
Click to read more »107.163.31 (talk) 23:36, 25 February 2025 (UTC) Comment: This articles intro seems exactly the same as this? --Cactus🌵 spiky ツ 10:00, 26 February 2025...
Click to read more »while it could be an interesting read it isn't notable enough and half the intro is just speculation.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:02, 12 June...
Click to read more »protected MediaWiki:Boardvote intro change (Voting is starting) 22:22, 30 May 2004 Tango protected MediaWiki:Boardvote intro (Voting is starting) 22:22,...
Click to read more »10:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC) I have rewritten it, and replacd it with a short intro, and plot section. Still needs references, but should be borderline keepable...
Click to read more »image..) so it comes down to complexity. Given the lack of wikifying in the intro, that needs cleaning. The second section is two sentences which should easily...
Click to read more »not a Norwegian death metal band. Also, Panzerdivision, as named in the intro of this article, is an en:wp redirect to Panzer Division, so nothing there...
Click to read more »extinct languages: Finding Latin on that site is no problem. Also, the intro looked pretty much like a copy of Everybodywiki, so we might have a copyright...
Click to read more »January 2010 (UTC) Keep - Have extended/rewritten the article based on enwp intro. --Eptalon (talk) 06:57, 20 January 2010 (UTC) Keep - (edit-conflict) actually...
Click to read more »don't get it. What's wrong with listing the alternate spellings at the intro to the article? It's not like we're being inconsistent throughout the article...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nothing important, just an intro and a link of reddit. This should be improved from an existing article English...
Click to read more »nothing about the topic of the article. This reference is shown to prove the intro line - name, DoB/death/ hero/combatant of communism in Brazil. At best,...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: The page states the obvious in the intro, and its only fact is unreferenced and arguable. It either needs expanding...
Click to read more »of the works of Charles Spurgeon. Of the 9 sentences in the article, the intro includes only the date the sermon was given and the "finings" section is...
Click to read more »impossibly tedious. With many articles the intro would be quite enough. Whole articles are shorter than some intros. By watching the way professional newsreaders...
Click to read more »oddly, this one didn't even bother to use the name of the airport in the intro.. its was only in infobox. 70.184.171.16 (talk) 07:09, 23 January 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »him. Voyage Dallas: This is an interview, but there are 3 paragraphs of intro about him that is not an interview, hence it should count towards notability...
Click to read more »I seriously doubt that the intro for a single wikipedia article is the exact same for all other languages. And if the intro isn't the same, then neither...
Click to read more »help and replaced the article we have with a stub, which summarizes the intro of the EnWP article. As always: few references, only a few sentences. I...
Click to read more »December 2015 (UTC) Comments. This is pretty much unsimplified from the intro of the enwiki article. In the process of simplifying, the editor left out...
Click to read more »transcluding diagrams into infoboxes that don't properly support RDTs {{Rdt intro}}: adds a category and basic description to the route template see the navbar...
Click to read more »other skins, it removes the white background, putting all text for the intro and TFA on blue. Personally, I think it looks fine, but other opinions are...
Click to read more »should also be. The foreign characters should only be displayed once: at the intro, by the first time the article's name is mentioned. And, while we're at...
Click to read more »English. Alalch Emis (talk) 09:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC) That is a good intro to Basic English for native speakers of English. I am suggesting a guide...
Click to read more »in particular) -DJSasso (talk) 13:36, 15 May 2013 (UTC) We could see an "intro-only for unreg or new users" as part of a 'new users' program. This might...
Click to read more »but it is placed in the lead-in for the general rules rather than the intro for quick deletion. "A page can be quickly deleted in the following situation...
Click to read more »link. In terms of usable secondary sources...this leaves us with only the intros to the interviews, at least for the ones in reliable sources. They do not...
Click to read more »-criterions?-Henswick (talk) 14:32, 18 August 2010 (UTC) As long as you make the intro simply. The criteria is a little different here though since you have to...
Click to read more »writing for the crowd here, first focus on the applications, like in an intro; in a section below, there is nothing against giving maths (or mathematical...
Click to read more »of blocking. -DJSasso (talk) 02:12, 26 September 2017 (UTC) Perhaps the intro on that page needs to be more clear about what to report and what is not...
Click to read more »Quite so. Another example of issues here. I found a double hyphen in the intro to the MOS which itself states double hypens should not be used. We need...
Click to read more »my knowledge, the stubs we have here (usually a few sentences from enwp intro, which more often than not are indentical to enwp) do in my opinion not...
Click to read more »December 2010 (UTC) enWP 'Mineral' says minerals are solid, and end of intro ref is 20th ed of Dana's Manual of Mineralogy. enWP 'Mercury (element)'...
Click to read more »seem to want would be a good idea too. I've gone ahead and simplified the intro from enWP and added it to the Simple article for Twitter. I'll work on some...
Click to read more »project could also cut down on schoolboy vandalism, if they've had a good intro and learned how to contribute and done some work, they most likely aren't...
Click to read more »I saw that and agree - some others too are just cut and pastes from the intros to enwiki articles. While there are only a few at this stage it may be best...
Click to read more »introduction then thats copynpasting, Cethegus once copied a full article, the intro with sections), and they're noy edeleted. TurboGolf 19:17, 30 January 2009...
Click to read more »Too many articles are brought over from enwiki as stubs, with only the intro from the original article. That may be better than nothing, but we shouldn't...
Click to read more »But in some of the changes earlier they left the summary that "earlier intro was fine" or something like that and did an addition that made it complex...
Click to read more »language. Macdonald-ross (talk) 20:31, 7 March 2014 (UTC) I have rewritten the intro, which was copied mostly form enwp; the other parts (positive and negative...
Click to read more »seems to not be one of Racepacket's. Diels-Alder reaction, at least the intro is worth keeping as it explains why the two scientists were awarded the...
Click to read more »idea. Even if we decide not to go down the final review steps, the basic intro stuff is valuable to help new editors. I will translate the pages that have...
Click to read more »properly categorized Page is wikified Page name bolded at beginning of intro important terms linked, even if the links are red page makes sense Appropriate...
Click to read more »and political trends which are not easily captured by dates. The 1980s intro is not bad, though it missed the discovery of AIDs, one of the few modern...
Click to read more »--Eptalon (talk) 06:47, 25 July 2012 (UTC) Done. It required splitting the intro into two templates - I'm not sure why, but if anybody else can manage it...
Click to read more »but has a wikidata link to en:Common blackbird, Turdus merula. But in the intro, it mentions a different species, en:Mistle thrush, Turdus viscivorus, which...
Click to read more »if necessary, I can outright remove and/or shorten some sections and the intro in this article. Futurist110 (talk) 07:13, 6 May 2021 (UTC) Issues with...
Click to read more »page (sub-page here or better yet Wikipedia talk:Lists and just leaving an intro blub with a link to it so those not interested in the topic can avoid the...
Click to read more »Thanks for the reply. 2 small additions: [edited] Here's an example of our intro to "Earth" run though Upgoer6 if you click on the highlighted words, it...
Click to read more »06:36, 13 September 2013 (UTC) Yes! I note a few long sentences in the intro which might also be edited with benefit. Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:22, 13...
Click to read more »Selena 4 ever 22:00, 28 December 2011 (UTC) OK, I did some work on the intro section. I'll do more when I get time. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:17, 28 December...
Click to read more »February 2026 (UTC) Let me re-state: I have recently added to / rewritten the intro, based on the DeWP article. I cannot see clear signs of AI generated content...
Click to read more »problem can be the placement of too much foreign (or off-topic text) in the intro section. Much tangent-level wording should be moved to lower sections. However...
Click to read more »May 2011 (UTC) What the contributor has done is a) to change the Grammar intro, and copy the rest, and b) add a Spanish translation. I would like to hear...
Click to read more »merge to at present, there is no need to keep this. Also, a minor note, the intro link is not to the 1988 series but to the 2013 remake. --Creol(talk) 19:00...
Click to read more »long, that is not a reason to delete it. I think we could simplify the intro a little, but there are a number of references to back up the research....
Click to read more »(talk) 22:33, 16 August 2014 (UTC) I think we agree that basic factual intros and infoboxes are not subject to deletion on grounds of lack of attribution...
Click to read more »watch · logs · delete) This page has stood there as a straight copy of the intro paragraphs from en.wikipedia for two months now. No progress has been made...
Click to read more »offline. Some issues to note: Remember to include all the basic parts: intro, history (if applicable), standard sections of WP:Layout (See also, Notes...
Click to read more »saw anything in the MoS that said that the Setting part had to be in the Intro. I am reverting my move very soon and am going to put the redirects up for...
Click to read more »I did try to improve it. Rathfelder (talk) 19:03, 28 October 2023 (UTC) Intro now fixed --Ferien (talk) 19:04, 28 October 2023 (UTC) But what does " The...
Click to read more »23:43, 1 October 2006 (UTC) Keep Needs a thorough going-over (trim the intro, citations, etc...), but this is a worthwhile encyclopedic topic. It needs...
Click to read more »source is what started my concerns about AI generation. The phrasing of the intro, the over-the-top tone, the organization of the article - all are hallmarks...
Click to read more »the standard "We appreciate all edits, and everyone can edit, but... " intro, a friendly comment should be the opening volley, not a ban threat. Pure...
Click to read more »didn't realize those previews were separate. I updated with the current intro text. --Gotanda (talk) 23:26, 18 May 2018 (UTC) Hi, Hugo Gaston page was...
Click to read more »evidence"}. Even if notable, it would not deserve a stand-alone article (see intro to WP:Notability). Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:28, 7 November 2021 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »the last few days, an IP, 203.111.235.50 has been creating pages with the intros, cats, templates and infoboxes copied from en and adding irrelevant content...
Click to read more »of the works of Charles Spurgeon. Of the 9 sentences in the article, the intro includes only the date the sermon was given and the "finings" section is...
Click to read more »(change · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) Portal:History/Intro (change · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) I'm requesting...
Click to read more »the GNG miserably when it comes to sources. It can not even get past the intro to notability without failing twice. None of the sources locally are remotely...
Click to read more »nothing as a footballer. I would question if that should even be in the intro as it is not anything he is known for. He has extensive professional volleyball...
Click to read more »As is now, this article is unkeepable. A keepable version would be: An intro, with perhaps 2-3 sections summarizing the arguments. With that, we can...
Click to read more »the intro is simple enough, the rest does not matter. It can be as complex as you want, but it might get deleted. Option 2. As long as the intro is simple...
Click to read more »The intro gives the game away. It has no perspective. A series of short sentences that don't flow together, and seem jerky. By the end of the intro we...
Click to read more »Nicholas" it is because the facts are unknown. If you take a look at the intro to the article on Giotto, which I am still simplifying, you will discover...
Click to read more »Simple English version of the GNU Free Documentation License This is an unofficial translation of the GNU Free Documentation License into Simple English...
Click to read more »--Isis§(talk) 15:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC) Added a (possibly hard to understand) intro; copied over the article on Giza (last redlink I saw), and started to simplify...
Click to read more »the criteria again. (You may also want to read the bolded section in the intro of this page.) Articles must meet all criteria or it cannot be promoted...
Click to read more »(used figuratively), began, enjoying, and various. Those are just from the intro. Also, be careful using expressions, such as saying "the song sold 500,000...
Click to read more »for a GA. Regards, Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 07:53, 20 July 2015 (UTC) The intro is for a summary, not a list of wins; the layout is so-so: left-ranging...
Click to read more »Left a few comments on the talk page, after a lot of work, mainly on the intro (and the political background in Cuba). Still needs more work though.--Eptalon...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Oppose I found issues in 7 of the 8 sentences in the too short intro. I stopped reading at that point as it is not even GA quality work in its...
Click to read more »representing pronunciation (such as IPA) are useless, and get in the way of the intro sentence, which affects readability. Do you see them in newspaper of magazine...
Click to read more »and volume) and mass. --Thrasymedes (talk) 20:08, 24 April 2023 (UTC) The intro is supposed to be an overview of everything. There's not going to be a whole...
Click to read more »Parcopa\b)" replace="$1harmac$2"/><!--avoid Parcopa--> <Typo word="(Pro/Re/Intro)duce" find="\b([iI]ntro|[pP]ro|[rR]e)duct(e[ds]?|ing)\b" replace="$1duc$2"/>...
Click to read more »I would reorder the content of the intro to place the dance info above the music info. I would split the intro into three short paras, rather than run...
Click to read more »introduction/lede that has 3-4 times the length of what it is now. If I only read the intro, I should get a fairly good understanding of the subject.--Eptalon (talk)...
Click to read more »(UTC) I would argue for rewritting much of the second paragraph of the intro. That entire section should sum up the key points of the article. Trivial...
Click to read more »Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 04:53, 25 November 2023 (UTC) Current version intro: 47.9, Classification: 68, Meaning: 60, History: 53.9, About schizophrenia:...
Click to read more »--SEPTActaMTA8235 16:03, 19 April 2011 (UTC) Demote Although I've improve the intro a bit, the article is probably an automatic demote: three sections flagged...
Click to read more »articles (for a third time, doesn't exist). Perhaps you need to read the intro to this page and the criteria page more thoroughly to help you understand...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:51, 28 January 2009 (UTC) Remove oppose assuming rewording of intro Soup Dish (talk) 18:08, 28 January 2009 (UTC) Hey SoupDish could you possibly...
Click to read more »are a few points that should be fixed. There should be references in the intro. Just because it's not in a section doesn't mean it shouldn't have references...
Click to read more »still make the merge work without removing too much, just as long as the intro isn't merged.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:08, 18 December...
Click to read more »(UTC) Done. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 23:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC) In the intro "Reagan is known to have created a political right." sounds very peculiar...
Click to read more »September 2020 (UTC) I'm troubled by the balance between the intro and the body of this page. The intro is long and sources are only placed in the body of the...
Click to read more »researched annd carefully written. For a major generic article to be good: The intro should be excellent The balance between the various sections should be considered...
Click to read more »Add a little bit on his influence on other artists ("Jazz?"). Rewrite intro, add refs. --Eptalon (talk) 21:07, 11 December 2009 (UTC) Closed as not...
Click to read more »"Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale", "high pressure", etc). However, I think the intro needs references. Megan|talkchanges 01:30, 14 March 2010 (UTC) Thanks for...
Click to read more »notability second. We don't normally draw attention to the publisher in an intro, however. His name is visible on the title page illustration. Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »12:38, 10 February 2010 (UTC) Comment: I just removed this addition to the intro "which many people believe was to be the start of revolution to create a...
Click to read more »When these two teams play, the game is called the "East Anglian derby". (intro) and One of Ipswich Town's nicknames is The Blues. (colours and crest)....
Click to read more »angles. There are problems with the perspective and quality of writing. The intro is a good example. It has no perspective. A series of short sentences that...
Click to read more »be sourced? TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 16:04, 23 December 2025 (UTC) In the Intro I think there is a sentence that white wine has been produced for at least...
Click to read more »YouTube - it states: "Provided to YouTube by EMPIRE Distribution Midas (Intro) • Icetre • Doom Bap Walking On Water • 2024 Blazington Music Group Released...
Click to read more »And then it all fell apart. The Intro was taken down to 7-10th grade readability. Refs got under control. The intro was trimmed and streamline while...
Click to read more »know why we all thought this was well written. I've only looked at the intro, and had to rewrite most of it. What can we be thinking? Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »confused here. I swear I rewrote the entire intro to an article on this subject a week or so ago.. The intro was heavily on the complex side and seemed...
Click to read more »that statement qualifies as a reason. Did the editor mean to lie in the intro? AGF and go with no. does it matter? not realy, it is still a blatenly false...
Click to read more »like information and ordering information so that ideas follow on. The intro was not well enough thought through. Some parts of the article are much...
Click to read more »other complex words like successor. The third sentence of intro can be broken down. The intro can be expanded. The page doesn't talk about hardware and...
Click to read more »Dotdotcomma_and_User:Cyber.Eyes.2005 and similar creation style (enwiki intro partial copying and adding {{reflist}} with sortkeys in same line) as well...
Click to read more »the birds. Based on what is it the wisest. This needs clarification. The intro needs good re-organization or maybe it needs some content addition and reworking...
Click to read more »should be little to know changes as the programs do not change often, One he intro is set and a bit is added to explain things, there should not be a lot of...
Click to read more »some edits to the page, such as moving all but one sentence out of the intro. It's a VGA, so can people please check if these edits are good?...
Click to read more »did remove the header as a header for a table is not an intro so it has now become an intro. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 10:08...
Click to read more »that the 2nd user aimed to restore previously removed statements in the intro (Dhadhor is ... Ahir or Yadav), please compare special:diff/9758784, special:diff/9585825...
Click to read more »wiki markup of my changes here for direct copy paste, with no formatting. Intro section '''Linus Gabriel Sebastian''' is a founder, [[editor-in-chief]]...
Click to read more »ouch 02:17, 18 August 2024 (UTC) The text looks like a simplified enwiki intro, {{uw-encopyright}} sent to the user. MathXplore (talk) 02:35, 18 August...
Click to read more »Dappercat (talk) 15:44, 5 September 2022 (UTC) Change being made: Updated intro, section 1, and deleted some very out-of-date (and borderline offensive)...
Click to read more »(musical artist). MathXplore (talk) 03:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC) As seen in the intro, the title does not match the context, please move the article without redirecting...
Click to read more »(talk) 14:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Many creations by this user are enwiki intro copies and possible QD A3 cases. Since the creator is repeating QD tag removal...
Click to read more »12 November 2025 (UTC) Source appears to be reliable from reading the intro pages. Peterdownunder (talk) 23:46, 12 November 2025 (UTC) How can we determine...
Click to read more »If we have facts about mass or volume, do we want to include them in the intro, in a section of the body, or both? Lights and freedom (talk) 19:38, 1 May...
Click to read more »We often just copy over a huge infobox and simplify part or all of the intro section and leave the rest for later. Over there, this tends to result in...
Click to read more »