Redirect to:
Any time that people work together, it is important to make rules that they should agree to follow. Most of the rules written here must be followed by...
Click to read more »This page consists of guidelines as to how bureaucrats process requests at Wikipedia:Changing username. Renames are a matter of discretion and bureaucrats...
Click to read more »article. Notability guidelines for articles about movies Notability guidelines for music related articles Notability guidelines for articles about people...
Click to read more »shortcut on Wikipedia is a quick way of getting to Category:Wikimedia, guidelines and project pages. They are shown in boxes to the right of the pages which...
Click to read more »article must actually show that the guidelines have been met. Evidence with references should be included. These guidelines are about whether a person is notable...
Click to read more »structured, you may need much more space. Please remember to use this guideline and all Wikipedia rules with common sense. It is more important to follow...
Click to read more »over the ones from other wikis. Because of this, no English Wikipedia policy is a policy on Simple English Wikipedia—they are never more than guidelines....
Click to read more »like. Sometimes bad changes stay in place for a long time. Wikipedia guidelines such as Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research and...
Click to read more »unless it meets these guidelines and common sense. The person adding the link has to show that it meets the guidelines. This guideline is about links to other...
Click to read more »article does not meet these notability guidelines, it is not a reason for quick deletion. Also, meeting these guidelines does not mean that an article must...
Click to read more »to drive away productive contributors: act in opposite of policies and guidelines such as Wikipedia:Civility,Wikipedia:No personal attacks, Wikipedia:Ownership...
Click to read more »but it is designed to keep editors from using Wikipedia policies and guidelines to delay a decision by making a long debate. Do not simply think that...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »For information about putting redirects into categories, please see the guideline on the English Wikipedia....
Click to read more »your words. Help: The entry to our help pages. Policy: The rules and guidelines you need to follow here. What Wikipedia is not: It's easy to misuse Wikipedia...
Click to read more »the world of Wikipedia. Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines is the main page for policies and guidelines. Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not says what articles...
Click to read more »okayed deletion --Auntof6 (talk) 07:54, 13 November 2020 (UTC) Notability Guidelines (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Spam); and you must always: Avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography. Contributing...
Click to read more »Important note: If a new article does not fully meet these notability guidelines, that is not a reason for quick deletion. A claim of notability is enough...
Click to read more »Category:Spoken Wikipedia requests or somewhere else Record it (Recording guidelines at English Wikipedia) Upload it Add Template:Spoken article to article...
Click to read more »don't like the guidelines, you should propose changes to them, not ignore them. Purplebackpack89 (talk) 00:07, 1 October 2009 (UTC) Guidelines don't need...
Click to read more »engineers and technical pioneers are not famous. Simple English Wikipedia's guidelines explicitly allow notability to be established through impact, leadership...
Click to read more »and why. Avoiding jargon. When pointing someone to a policy or set of guidelines, use its whole name, to help them find it easily. Avoiding using bans...
Click to read more »the English Wikipedia's Manual of Style for disambiguation pages. The guidelines are mostly the same on this wiki. Next, choose a disambiguation page to...
Click to read more »the easy parts of laying out an article. For more detail about style guidelines, see the Simple Manual of Style. For greater detail about how to use wiki...
Click to read more »names or abbreviations of those of our site rules (the "policies and guidelines") that the blocking administrator believes you have violated. Before you...
Click to read more »community is generally friendly and offers a lot of freedom in using these guidelines to regular editors. Particularly, community-building activities that are...
Click to read more »additional/subject-specific notability guidelines does not guarantee inclusion; conversely, not meeting subject-specific N guidelines may not lead to deletion if...
Click to read more »WikiProject subpages – for project-specific templates, discussion, or guidelines pages. Dividing up Wikipedia process pages (e.g., Wikipedia:Articles for...
Click to read more »oversight may be needed. Help younger users protect themselves through our guidelines: Wikipedia:Protecting children's privacy Cyberbullying fact sheet "Cyber...
Click to read more »Administrators can protect pages to stop them from being changed. They can also unprotect pages. There are five types of protection; full protection, semi-protection...
Click to read more »them not guidelines here. Per WP:FOLLOW en.wiki guidelines only apply here when we don't already have the policy here. So if you create a guideline with just...
Click to read more »material by Wikipedia editors. For the purposes of Wikipedia policies and guidelines, primary, secondary and tertiary sources are defined as follows: Tertiary...
Click to read more »subject is involved in, teachers, or fans. Obscure topics are perfectly okay to have articles on Wikipedia, as long as they meet notability guidelines....
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »of policy. Example: Posting a neutral notice that does not violate the guideline on canvassing, while using a different set of notifications to lure a...
Click to read more »and have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines (especially Wikipedia:BLP, Wikipedia:Copyright, Wikipedia:Verifiability...
Click to read more »though no man will ever be given this award. The other rules of this guideline apply to the newly-started category. Voting on gender-related categories...
Click to read more »write articles for the Simple English Wikipedia. The Schools/Projects guidelines here help fix these problems. Please read the "The teachers' guide" for...
Click to read more »these policies and guidelines The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion. The main four guidelines and policies that inform...
Click to read more »use it. However, any such use of an account must conform to Wikipedia guidelines, particularly those of sockpuppetry. No known period without editing makes...
Click to read more »subject meets the notability guidelines here. Publiology (talk) 07:49, 2 March 2015 (UTC) You keep referring to the guidelines here, as opposed to at enwiki...
Click to read more »what their ''guideline says''. I've quoted the guidelines both on your user page and on Simple Talk. Auntof6 has linked the guidelines above in the nomination...
Click to read more »over subjectivity. Dispassion, not bias. As with any rule of thumb, this guideline should be balanced against other needs for the text, especially the need...
Click to read more »appear to have a policy page for, we follow English Wikipedia, but as a guideline, never policy. Here are some things that are different on this Wikipedia:...
Click to read more »the policy on its discussion page to attempt to reach an agreement or compromise. Policy dispute on English Wikipedia Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »etc). And since wikipedia's notability guidelines are based on coverage in sources and the notability guidelines are based on how likely they are to meet...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »article should not be tagged as {{complex}}. It should comply with the guideline on writing Simple English articles. If possible, readability tests, such...
Click to read more »NATH (enWP notability guidelines specific to the Olympics and track sports). Note, he does meet one criteria within our own guideline (PEOPLE#Athletes) but...
Click to read more »of this request for deletion was to Delete. Does not meet notability guidelines Peterdownunder (talk) 21:42, 20 April 2021 (UTC) Asif Jeriya (edit · talk...
Click to read more »months given. Guidelines are there to work with them. They are not policy, but most (active) editors will agree with most of the guideline. --Eptalon (talk)...
Click to read more »reason: Fails general notability guidelines. The awards mentioned aren't significant to meet notability guidelines for organizations. BRP ever 13:41...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »administrator's discretion to delete in accordance with applicable policy and guideline. Shortcuts WP:REVDELETEWP:REVDELETE WP:REVDELWP:REVDEL WP:RDWP:RD Selective...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Fails our notability guidelines for the company and our general notability guidelines. BRP ever 00:57, 28 October 2021 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »a discussion to remove the porn-specific criteria from the notability guidelines. Please comment at Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Porn stars. Lights...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:5WP:5 WP:5PWP:5P WP:PILLARSWP:PILLARS Wikipedia's rules can be shown through the five pillars that show how the project works:...
Click to read more »enwiki. A writer who fails to meet our notability guidelines for author and general notability guidelines. BRP ever 13:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »situation is not covered by the policies and guidelines that exist here, we will look at the policies and guidelines on the main English Wikipedia". - Huji...
Click to read more »of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines. Following the completion of the UCoC Enforcement Guidelines Draft in 2022, the guidelines were voted on by the Wikimedian...
Click to read more »promoted. Of course, this is a wiki, we have manuals of style and other guidelines with which articles should comply and the chances of an article making...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't meet notability guidelines. Fails WP:NCORP and there are no sources. BRP ever 03:23, 4 September...
Click to read more »enough to make the subject meet general notability guidelines (WP:GNG) or the notability guidelines for actors that we have (w:WP:NACTOR). BRP ever 06:14...
Click to read more »asked to remember the above guidelines and use good judgment when creating redirects, ensuring that the spirit of our guidelines are followed. Users that...
Click to read more »people say you do not know enough about the article. Show the users this guideline and others will help you. You may want to ask someone you respect who...
Click to read more »notablity guidelines and inclusion guidelines. While my common sense tells me to advocate for delete, I can't if our notablity guidelines and inclusion...
Click to read more »The following is the guideline of how users who are members of global groups should use those groups on the Simple English Wikipedia. Users with global...
Click to read more »encyclopedia article. The way we do that on Wikipedia is through our notability guidelines. I would make the following points: The reason Humility was on the Mayflower...
Click to read more »any other indication of notability. TEDx's guidelines seem to set a low bar. From TEDx's eligibility guidelines: You need to a apply for a license Anyone...
Click to read more »essay (but not an official guideline). EhJJ (talk) 03:13, 5 March 2009 (UTC) I would agree. Someone should draft up some guidelines for other people to use...
Click to read more »with articles that fail to meet the guidelines.· Tygartl1·talk· 14:44, 31 August 2007 (UTC) Speedy keep - This guideline serves us as a means to learn that...
Click to read more »v t e Rules Overview Five pillars Policies and guidelines List of policies List of guidelines Follow English Wikipedia Project-wide principles Consensus...
Click to read more »Working with others Civility No personal attacks Harassment No legal threats Consensus Dispute resolution More Full list of policies List of guidelines...
Click to read more »a recent ArbCom ruling making it even stricter. I tried to find some guidelines/policies here, but I came up a little bit blank, so I decided to come...
Click to read more »deleted. For an example, see Wikipedia:Requests for page importation: Guidelines for admins on the English Wikipedia. You may find the easiest way to avoid...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »notability guidelines for web-based and cryptocurrency projects under [WP:GNG](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:General_notability_guideline) and [WP:WEB](https://en...
Click to read more »fact that other year articles may include events which break this set of guidelines is not a valid reason to do so for another event. Any of the standards...
Click to read more »This is an information page. It is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, but rather intends to describe some aspect(s) of Wikipedia's norms, customs...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Meets notablity guidelines, but sources are needed--Peterdownunder (talk) 22:51, 19 September 2018...
Click to read more »This is a rough draft of what may eventually become a guideline. Feel free to help out. This project is aimed at helping four groups of people: People...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »This is an information page. It is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, but rather intends to describe some aspect(s) of Wikipedia's norms, customs...
Click to read more »(UTC) If there's no specific notability guideline for TV series, then you'd use the general notability guideline. I still don't see any indication of notability...
Click to read more »content, but obviously, I haven't done anything which will prohibit the guidelines of Wikipedia. Miffsseek (talk) 11:16, 17 March 2020 (UTC) Delete - blatant...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »which imply the presence of spoilers. The No disclaimers in articles guideline details why spoiler warnings are not used on Wikipedia. It is not acceptable...
Click to read more »enforce the letter of the policies and guidelines or is it more important to enforce the spirit of said guidelines? Administrative judgment is fairly self-explanatory...
Click to read more »"showing notability" with "meeting notability guidelines". For example, geographic places meet the guideline just because they exist, and people in certain...
Click to read more »you could tell me whether there is a special project for books and the guidelines of this project. Thank you for your help.--Austroungarika (talk) 18:54...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. GNG is "general notability guidelines: if a topic has received important coverage in reliable sources that are...
Click to read more »forms and spellings of the word, to the actual article name. As a general guideline, the most common name used in English should be used to name an article...
Click to read more »simplicity as our primary guideline for making decisions –; or when it comes into conflict with other guidelines: naming guidelines for categories states...
Click to read more »This is an information page. It is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, but rather intends to describe some aspect(s) of Wikipedia's norms, customs...
Click to read more »your article reads like an advertisement or does not meet the notability guidelines described above, it will probably be deleted very quickly. My article...
Click to read more »to the Simple English Wikipedia. I have notices that theologies and guidelines are very similar. So I think I would make an excellent administrator....
Click to read more »(Common Era) are sometimes used instead of BC and AD. Is there some sort of guideline about this? Thanks. Oh, and I don't know yet about the parent question...
Click to read more »actual point still stands. If the guidelines are out of date they should be updated immediately instead of written guidelines but unwritten actual criteria...
Click to read more »reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject. The guidelines on this page are intended to reflect the fact that sports figures are...
Click to read more »policies and guidelines, so don't be surprised if long-term users are not familiar with all of them. Some people try to treat guidelines as being far...
Click to read more »should be well versed in these things. You should have already known our guidelines. I gave you one minute, but you've been an admin for far longer. Synergy...
Click to read more »them. If you are unsure what the category should be called, our naming guidelines may give you a better idea. When you click the button below, you will...
Click to read more »as merging. Keep - The subject of this article meets the WP:CREATIVE guidelines. Please also look up her Wikipedia article on 1 and, if you want to, you...
Click to read more »reason u gave was: you "didn't provide any reliable sources per WP:RS guidelines". How come sites like goldenglobes.com, thedailystar, The Daily Observer...
Click to read more »Wikipedias. The list itself is not a policy or guideline, but it does link to some relevant policies and guidelines. If you have any questions about it, feel...
Click to read more »en:Wikipedia:Media copyright questions and am quite well versed with non-free content guidelines on en (presumably ours would be similar) and the requirements to comply...
Click to read more »Dear all, About 11 days ago the ratification voting for the Enforcement Guidelines of the UCoC started. There are three more days left before the voting...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »a unique (and separate) project with our own guidelines and policies. Case in point, the enwiki guideline states "Notability requires only the existence...
Click to read more »above which is a guideline that when we don't have any local policies / guidelines, we can take enwp policies / guidelines as guidelines. But clearly we...
Click to read more »comments to its talk page. The idea would be to get this to a status of a Guideline, if not even a Policy. I have made some changes, to what most of you will...
Click to read more »is recognised in the Wikipedia:Notability guideline under #Articles not satisfying the notability guidelines. It suggests that if an article does not demonstrate...
Click to read more »British Person alive. N1TH Music (talk) 07:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC) What guideline says that all super centenarians are notable? If there isn't one, then...
Click to read more »simple English in all Simple Wikipedia content (category usage notes, guidelines and policies, help pages, template documentation pages, etc.), except...
Click to read more »more about what Wikipedia is not I want to learn more about conflicts of interest I want to learn more about Wikipedia's guidelines on autobiographies...
Click to read more »together, but somehow this is what usually happens. One of our important guidelines that reminds editors to work together is "assume good faith". This is...
Click to read more »No-one suggests 'you' should be used inappropriately, just that the guidelines be adjusted to permit its use where it is clearly better practice. Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »my view. It may however be the case that the subject fails notability guidelines, or there are other issues. Thanks, --IWI (talk) 22:18, 17 March 2021...
Click to read more »(there shouldn't as admins are set to enforce the guidelines not to be one who set the guidelines via deletion). This cannot be prevented as no one think...
Click to read more »about the library, as is the Brittle Paper interview. I just reviewed the guidelines for reliable sources and it is unclear which standards these sources fail...
Click to read more »allowed in Wikipedia article guidelines because readers looking a article and found it's un-encyclopedic Fails Wikipedia Guidelines Raayaan9911 Talk to me!...
Click to read more »was: Serious discussions, which may result in a change of eg. policies/guidelines go to a different page. Looking at Village Pump at enwp, what they term...
Click to read more »have not had any problems with misusing the tools or with following the guidelines too closely. I have logged over 10 blocks, 100+ deletions, 100+ unblocks...
Click to read more »British is a race, then a lower level of categorisation should apply; the guidelines state: "Ethnic groups are commonly used when categorizing people; however...
Click to read more »except the last words you mention. Apart from basic GNG guidelines, there are some additional guidelines we use from enwiki in order to ensure whether to keep...
Click to read more »unable to verify the notability of the subject to cross our notability guidelines. But I leave community to decide on it. Note that the user who created...
Click to read more »administration. It is passes general simple english Wikipedia notability guidelines. The subject (Mohammad Rafique musician) of the article is match with...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep Brenda Abdelall meets notability guidelines based on her prominent public service and verifiable media coverage. She...
Click to read more »combination. Guidelines, technically speaking, have less prescriptive power compared to policy, but that is not to say that guidelines are optional....
Click to read more »must follow the rules below in order to comply with the policies and guidelines on Simple Wikipedia as well as copyright law. Pages that include AI content...
Click to read more »the problem remains; it is not notable now. Notability is one of the guidelines that prevent this project from becoming an indiscriminate collection of...
Click to read more »Guidelines were published 24 January 2022 as a proposed way to apply the Universal Code of Conduct across the movement. Comments about the guidelines...
Click to read more »essay pointing you to places that are guidelines. Probably the best way to have it so we don't have competing guidelines. -DJSasso (talk) 17:28, 28 February...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »nobody changes their opinion here, I'm gonna add this to the relevant guidelines/policies. - Huji reply 15:26, 16 November 2007 (UTC) I don't know Huji...
Click to read more »much strips it of authority. I understand that we don't need most of the guidelines, but I do feel that we should have local versions of at least the most...
Click to read more »interprets policies and guidelines a certain way. Yes, it concedes, there are potentially other ways to look at the policies and guidelines. But that's not how...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »current VGAs to be in line with the new guideline. Given how long this guideline took to become a guideline, I do (currently) not dare change it. --Eptalon...
Click to read more »that we now need to discuss making some notability guidelines. We have the general notability guideline... and with that, each page that we suspect may not...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »notability guideline on athletes only provides some examples, of which he does not meet. That guideline also references enWP's guidelines, and he does...
Click to read more »some of the guidelines you quote here. The notability guideline doesn't say anything about "good contributions". The reliable sources guideline doesn't recommend...
Click to read more »would like to move Category:Proposed to Category:Proposed policies and guidelines. I though we should discuss this before the category is actually moved...
Click to read more »what's really needed and what is over-doing it. There is also this guideline, this guidelines and this how-to page for reference. Using common sense to apply...
Click to read more »it Simple. This Wikipedia needs to written in simple English. Read the guidelines for Simple English for more details Censorship. Wikipedia is not censored...
Click to read more »As most of the main Wiki's tend to follow either English's notability guidelines or have ones similar to them, It would follow that most pages found on...
Click to read more »this user has been repeatedly commenting with no regard for notability guidelines. The fact he wrote the script for a few episodes is irrelevant as far...
Click to read more »single edit for more than a year, I guess even meta hinted that on their guidelines for an admin. Also, in a situation such as Gwib, the community supports...
Click to read more »policy doesn't exist here we use en's. I would assume that extends to guidelines as well. -Djsasso (talk) 13:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC) Chill out Goblin. I...
Click to read more »page gives general notability guidelines, as well as guidelines for some specific subject areas. There are guidelines for other areas on enwiki, such...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Duplicate of Category:Proposed policies and guidelines. Found this also. Osiris (talk) 15:23, 15 December 2011 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »new guidelines, instead, you created new pages for them as some did not exist here. Chenzw Talk 11:38, 15 April 2008 (UTC) The first guideline I would...
Click to read more »of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines Revisions committee is requesting comments regarding the Revised Enforcement Draft Guidelines for the Universal Code...
Click to read more »here" policy we have and use their actions in the matter as suggestions/guidelines if not an outright acceptance of a type of "global topic ban". The editors...
Click to read more »case), we use enwiki's as a guideline. Of course, that's not to say that we can't add our own versions of policies and guidelines that we don't have here...
Click to read more »This is an information page. It is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, but rather intends to describe some aspect(s) of Wikipedia's norms, customs...
Click to read more »deprecated guideline on enwiki but not here for whatever reason. As it is said at the top of "Additional guidelines", Meeting one or more of these guidelines does...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »English uses much of the basic grammar of English (with added rules and guidelines) and only a small part of its vocabulary. Simple English is based on Basic...
Click to read more »on new changes and use Twinkle. I have carefully read all the rollback guidelines and I think the tool will help me a lot in my quest to stop vandalism...
Click to read more »may meet the notability guidelines at Enwiki but not here. There is also the problem in that another wiki may have a guideline, but may not follow it....
Click to read more »good to have guidelines to help explain what splits are undesirable, as specifically as possible. For example, we could have a guideline that says "don't...
Click to read more »- Misunderstood, I see it is granted by stewards and there are strict guidelines. Fair enough. Kennedy (talk) 09:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC) Support Meh...
Click to read more »of the en:WP:SPORTS guidelines are that players who meet them will have had coverage to meet GNG. The reasoning for the guideline is so that players in...
Click to read more »Promotional article about news website that doesn't meet our notability guidelines. BRP ever 12:58, 29 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »(And if we did create WP:ENGVAR, what about the other hundred or so MOS guidelines?) –Juliancolton | Talk 02:40, 16 April 2009 (UTC) I believe we create...
Click to read more »so few active editors and admins compared to En. The linked guidelines are the En guidelines, but I suspect here if an article has been left unsourced for...
Click to read more »that are willing to help us make this wiki the best it can be. Our own guidelines of what this wiki is not (not news, not pop culture) is fighting against...
Click to read more »these policies and guidelines The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion. The main four guidelines and policies that inform...
Click to read more »enwiki so not notable" way of thinking. This easily fits the notability guidelines. IWI (chat) 15:50, 24 May 2020 (UTC) Keep seeing some results on Google...
Click to read more »up in policy and appeared to be just that they didn't like it. Current guidelines are pretty clear that situations like official names are perfectly valid...
Click to read more »particularly usernames who haven't edited? Can we not make a blanket guideline and avoid any actions on accounts with no edits? In my opinion, the edits...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Fails in anybio and in General Notability Guidelines as well. Cited sources reads like promotional or paid. 🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN...
Click to read more »article that shows notability, or might not be familiar with all the guidelines about notability for the type of subject the article is about (with some...
Click to read more »January 2008 (UTC) Maybe more prominence should be given to the school guidelines, and also a better way of starting a school account than has happened...
Click to read more »shows no indication of notability. Please read the general notability guidelines - there are no significant coverage from reliable and independent sources...
Click to read more »look into it as a non-notable movie. (As we don't have local notabilty guidelines, I'm refering to en:WP:MOVIE.) - Huji reply 03:25, 6 August 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »and administrators as we have here. We still apply the same notability guidelines, whether for QD or RfD. They were deleted for a lack of notability four...
Click to read more »the reason: Promotional article about an app that fails our notability guidelines. BRP ever 06:12, 6 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails general notability guidelines and doesn't meet any of our other notability criteria. Likely spam/paid...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails general notability guidelines as there is no significant coverage in reliable sources. The wall street...
Click to read more »v t e Rules Overview Five pillars Policies and guidelines List of policies List of guidelines Follow English Wikipedia Project-wide principles Consensus...
Click to read more »that is a guideline here. And WP:USER is technically a rule. It is in Wikipedia:Rules#Behaviour guidelines and these behaviour guidelines are "rules...
Click to read more »continued comments and ideas on the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines. Your responses have helped to build a stronger Universal Code of Conduct...
Click to read more »of the en:WP:SPORTS guidelines are that players who meet them will have had coverage to meet GNG. The reasoning for the guideline is so that players in...
Click to read more »to meet the notability guidelines. Beyond our local general criteria, I've always followed the English Wikipedia's guidelines to judge specific topics'...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: May not meet our notability guidelines, there are no claims of notability. BRP ever 06:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »reason: Promotional article about a person who fails to meet our notability guidelines. Likely COI case, and this version is a copy of enwiki draft that was...
Click to read more »a show which seems notable, but the page doesn't meet our notability guidelines. There is no in-depth coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. BRP...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Certainly fails to meet the guidelines we have for notability in music, and I was amused to read this in one...
Click to read more »etc. Surely an objective set of guidelines for granting could be decided? If one admin granted it outside the guidelines the way forward would be clear...
Click to read more »the final decisions and turn down those that they believe do not meet guidelines or policies. A further safeguard is found at the bottom of the Wikipedia:Deletion...
Click to read more »Similarly, to me there seems little point in changing related policies and guidelines here, until that decision has been reached. As for dispute resolution...
Click to read more »appear like paid coverage. I don't think the subject meets notability guidelines because the coverage isn't independently written. See also en:Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »just a reminder that the Universal Code of Conduct Draft Enforcement Guidelines are open for review and comment. The Drafting Committee will start working...
Click to read more »such as merging. Keep I believe the subject may indeed meet notability guidelines based on some findings in Google search results that suggest Luke Hessler...
Click to read more »Transport here. I have read Wikipedia:WikiProject and I will follow the guidelines on there. Thanks. Tbo 157 (talk) 15:53, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Please create...
Click to read more »how we worded it. Guidelines are sometimes used to further a personal goal rather than to help figure out problems and a guideline on voting would certainly...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Does not seem to pass the musician notability guidelines. Article is promotional in the way it is worded. Little is found in a...
Click to read more »en:Wikipedia:Autobiography This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »coverage in reliable sources, no claims to notability that match any of our guidelines. Griff (talk) 02:44, 4 April 2022 (UTC) Delete Typical You-tuber looking...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet the relevant guidelines for notability. Osiris (talk) 22:07, 7 February 2014 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: It definitely does not meet any policies or guidelines. CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 06:52, 29 April 2013 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Delete. Not notable, doesn't meet our guidelines Peterdownunder (talk) 05:46, 7 November 2021 (UTC) Black Feather Messengers...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Don't believe this subject passes notability guidelines. Typical CEO/CFO. Gordonrox24 | Talk 02:25, 5 August 2021 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »Fails the general notability guideline —Belwine (talk) 10:16, 8 March 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails the general notability guideline. Note the editor has put up...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »approach. This is not a case of someone who is deliberately flouting the guidelines of our wiki. Yet the fact of the matter is that it is not anywhere near...
Click to read more »remember that the main guideline for deciding any article's notability is the general notability guideline. The subject-specific guidelines are merely a guide...
Click to read more »find many articles still here which lies below our notability guidelines. If these guidelines are made clear we can make the long RFD process short to QD...
Click to read more »you will stop doing whatever got you blocked." Based on those 4 of 6 guidelines, I am not convinced. Gotanda (talk) 04:23, 5 May 2013 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »used on Wikipedia:TASERING, which I think has the potential of being a guideline, but image uploads are not allowed on this wiki. I was wondering how people...
Click to read more »work, not a patient guide. Cite peer-reviewed publications and clinical guidelines, not health journalism or patient information leaflets. Distinguish clearly...
Click to read more »fails the general notability guideline and has a very promotional tone. Doesn't pass our neutral point of view guideline at all either. --Ferien (talk)...
Click to read more »Kennedy (talk • changes). 09:45, 1 August 2009 (UTC) What rules? They're guidelines not policy and the specifically permit a crat to make a judgment call...
Click to read more »flooding is disruption, and indeed the meta page, and now our own, is only a guideline, not a policy, and suggests that admins use it, not that they must, further...
Click to read more »for making the mistake. If yes, what will the frequency be, in zhwp the guidelines is no more than 5 / min, what shall be the rate here? Thanks much. Camouflaged...
Click to read more »work on simplification there. Either way (talk) 21:03, 10 May 2011 (UTC) I have proposed a guideline here. chris†ianrocker90 13:58, 13 May 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Doesn't have sources. Doesn't pass notability guidelines. Ma'az (talk) 19:30, 29 March 2018 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »inappropriate is that it doesn't meet our guidelines (because it is misleading). Notice that at the en guidelines, it puts "misleading names" under the "inappropriate...
Click to read more »time to write the guidelines down. At this point really its been consensus by silence that doing it this way is ok and guidelines are descriptive not...
Click to read more »Beefball has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet guidelines set out in WP:ENT. Person in question appears to have only many small...
Click to read more »Peterdownunder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet guidelines for notability in music. Peterdownunder (talk) 02:25, 31 March 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Promotional article about an author who fails to meet our notability guidelines. BRP ever 01:45, 1 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »shouldn't be limited to just reading articles because they can't understand guidelines. That's defies the point of a wiki. "Agreement" at least has its roots...
Click to read more »here. It's an essay so neither policy or a guideline on en. As such it is also not a policy or guideline here. -DJSasso (talk) 02:38, 28 April 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »their guidelines. I don't think why we need to discuss on enwp the issues. If we are seeing a lot of issues with FOOTY as a subject guidelines, we can...
Click to read more »content has (twice) been restored. In an effort to ensure that changes to guidelines and policies and the like have broad community support, I'm asking for...
Click to read more »list itself is unofficial -- not policy or guideline -- but it does link to relevant policies and guidelines where possible. If you have any questions...
Click to read more »of relevant policies/guidelines is a key responsibility for an administrator. For each of the below stated policies/guidelines, please provide an example...
Click to read more »this project if they want to post content here. That means following the guidelines at Wikipedia:How_to_write_Simple_English_pages. This first attempt is...
Click to read more »long as they pass notability guidelines – many British and American schools are deleted for failing notability guidelines too – so please note this isn't...
Click to read more »Nollywood actor. Has significant roles in local movies. Meets basic BLP guidelines. --165.155.168.154 (talk) 18:28, 25 October 2021 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »to meet any of the guidelines about notability. In addition, all the articles are based on sources which fail Wikipedia's guidelines on reliable sources:...
Click to read more »their change history/count) is familiar with Wikipedia's Policies and guidelines. Candidate's acceptance: Due to the obvious quality issues that we have...
Click to read more »delete, are any articles that begin with WP. These link to en's policies, guidelines, and essays that might be important. So those need to stay. Synergy 15:30...
Click to read more »"pop" while others are better suited being more subdued. Policies and guidelines notices need the pop screaming "Hey you! Read this now!", while cleanup...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails our notability guidelines as it has no significant reliable sources. The page looks like a job profile...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Trivia. Does not meet notability (films) guidelines Rus793 (talk) 15:36, 27 April 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »6 million youtube views, but that's not enough to meet our notability guidelines. BRP ever 06:05, 1 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »reason: Page about entrepreneur and inventor that fails to meet notability guidelines. The page fails GNG as the sources aren't reliable. It is likely paid...
Click to read more »(UTC) I like the idea on the first and second parts of your proposed guidelines, but for the third one, I think it would be better to move the {{vgood}}...
Click to read more »your article looks like an advertisement or does not meet the notability guidelines described above, it will probably be deleted very quickly. The best advice...
Click to read more »blurring out Sony on a PSP or Apple on an iPod. LIAM ! Hello, I have done a guideline, at WP:SETTLEMENT, regarding that earlier vote. --Eptalon 20:36, 2 August...
Click to read more »meets the GNG guidelines. The remaining issue that is open is the article reliability. They are credible and meet the WP:NRVE guidelines. Bonvoybrilliant...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »in reliable sources. This matches the English Wikipedia's notability guidelines for football players, in which J. League Divisions 1 and 2 are the only...
Click to read more »the Phillipines are not considered to be notable". according to what guideline or standard is that true? That's not a true statement so far as I know...
Click to read more »wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#english Nallalo (talk) 18:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC) Note those guidelines apply to all talk pages apart from...
Click to read more »English Wikipedia have been lifted. This is a violation of the user page guidelines. The page is now larger than any article on this wiki and is growing continuously...
Click to read more »them to my userspace and simplifying them per the word list, grammar guidelines, and readability tool to ensure that users of beginning English and younger...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »another user, regardless of whether the talk page is for a registered editor or for an unregistered "anonymous" editor. Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines...
Click to read more »interest in improving Wikipedia. RF is far too reliant on the rules (guidelines), and appears desperate to please people (use of barnstars, friends lists...
Click to read more »guideline here on reliable sources. They do of course at English wikipedia ( Wikipedia:Reliable sources ) and moreover it is a fundamental guideline when...
Click to read more »[55][56] So this first sample contains more than one violation of our guidelines on plagiarism. I looked through a few of the others; some of them look...
Click to read more »involved in the project in order to be fully aware of change in policy and guidelines. If a candidate went for RFA after nine months of inactivity, they would...
Click to read more »Fylbecatulous talk 11:31, 23 October 2015 (UTC) Keep. Meets notability guidelines. Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »here. But yes there are cases where you could write simple versions for guidelines or policies if you wanted to. However, there are not many that we need...
Click to read more »annons to submit articles for review. If the article meet the article guidelines it is accepted by a "reviewer" (a autoconfirmed editor). This is also...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Trivia. Does not meet notability (films) guidelines Rus793 (talk) 15:35, 27 April 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Does not meet guidelines for notabilityPeterdownunder (talk) 06:30, 24 January 2021 (UTC) Mohsen...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Fails notability guidelines eurodyne (talk) 22:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC) Delete as lacking notability...
Click to read more »dumped after being rejected there multiple times. Doesn't meet notability guidelines and the sources aren't reliable or significant. BRP ever 08:24, 26 October...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Trivia, Does not meet notability guidelines Enfcer (talk) 23:10, 28 April 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »Doesn't meet GNG, and the claim is not strong enough to meet any other guidelines. Likely not-notable. BRP ever 17:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Trivia, Does not meet Notability Guidelines Enfcer (talk) 23:17, 28 April 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to meet our notability guidelines Only (talk) 20:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »it. For some reason it isn't marked as a guideline yet. If everyone is happy with it, I will add a {{guideline}} tag to it. — Cheers, Truth's Out There...
Click to read more »are cases of blatant vandalism, we disregard any notablility or style guidelines; Articles created from schools that do not meet these guidleinnes (probably...
Click to read more »We have several new articles on Hindu temples. What are the notability guidelines for this kind of thing? --Auntof6 (talk) 03:01, 1 February 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »As Auntof6 mentions the purpose of NFOOTBALL and other sub-notability guidelines is to protect clearly notable people who it might be harder to adequately...
Click to read more »-DJSasso (talk) 18:57, 5 July 2010 (UTC) Folks, I need to know what is the guideline regarding reversing another administrator's actions. Reference this thread...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Notability not shown/does not meet notability guidelines User:Rus793 (talk) 14:46, 12 August 2015 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »is about a musician/vocalist but I don't see it meeting the notability guidelines here. First three references have same thing on them and the fourth reference...
Click to read more »book" is any such thing. Don't think this person meets our notability guidelines. Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:34, 3 July 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »A page about a Wildlife photographer that doesn't meet our notability guidelines. The creator of the page was blocked for undisclosed paid editing. The...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't meet the notability guidelines. Only source on the page is associated with the subject. Hardly any reliable...
Click to read more »no longer automatically notable. They need to meet either of the above guidelines.-BRP ever 13:27, 27 October 2021 (UTC) This request is due to close on...
Click to read more »Garden had already proved his ability and trust on enwiki. Besides, the guidelines state a few hundred edits are enough. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:00, 14 May...
Click to read more »notability guidelines to us so their results aren't relevant- neither are en's, for the record, although they at least have similar notability guidelines. The...
Click to read more »verifiable on Google Books, which are valid references under simple Wikipedia guidelines. The publication of several works is a clear indicator of significance...
Click to read more »school projects. There are guidelines for the setting up of a class project, see Wikipedia:Schools/Projects. If these guidelines are followed then there...
Click to read more »found In a Google Search, does not seem to pass or meet the notability guidelines for musicians Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 21:21, 15 March 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »and 2021. I’m looking to see if they have been recreated to meet any guidelines or if it’s still should be deleted. If they are then get them categorized...
Click to read more »status to this wiki. I have also sent him a small [proposed] list or guidelines for people to warrant the rollback tool. Minimum of 1 month experience...
Click to read more »currently do not see how this song (a single song) could meet notability guidelines; we are looking at a Hi Hop song. Ask yourself: In 5 to 10 years, how...
Click to read more »(talk) 04:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC) Delete as he does not meet notability guidelines --Peterdownunder (talk) 05:56, 23 July 2011 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »through Google Translate (so, no problem). But, I don't know if Wikipedia guidelines permit non English sources for English article. That's only it. If there's...
Click to read more »--–Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 00:48, 11 July 2011 (UTC) Well per our accessibility guidelines we are supposed to design our articles to look good under 1024x768. So...
Click to read more »guidance from the community about how this is to be assessed. Without guidelines, this page has little meaning or usefulness, and I have read the arguments...
Click to read more »Delete It's not a hoax but I don't think it really meets the notability guidelines, it could NEVER get beyond a stub. Jamesofur (talk) 15:30, 5 October 2009...
Click to read more »Barras was also involved in the discussion and that goes against most guidelines when it comes to closing things - you should be uninvolved so that your...
Click to read more »Besides, there's no forms of advertising in the sources. Besides, Wikipedia guidelines also recommends sources from Google Books, JSTOR, etc. Haoreima (talk)...
Click to read more »content, but obviously, I haven't done anything which will prohibit the guidelines of Wikipedia. Mike1turner (talk) 12:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »I have to be careful about when making these (ie. are there specific guidelines about website articles, what constitutes notability in this case, what...
Click to read more »discussion of their knowledge or lack thereof of the main policies and guidelines would also be useful. Talking about a candidate having a responsible or...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article failing notability guidelines for movies/films. NXcrypto Chatting 11:10, 6 December 2024 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »subpages) The content of their editnotices shall be subject to the same guidelines for user page content. Editnotices should not have contain colours that...
Click to read more »it is well within the guidelines to exist. -DJSasso (talk) 17:06, 25 February 2019 (UTC) Leaning Keep I tried to find a guideline which might suggest deleting...
Click to read more »wasn't a self nom I would probably be willing to forgive the 3 month guideline. I do agree you are a good editor, but I need a larger sample size to...
Click to read more »mentioned by multiple media organisations. The English wiki talk page has guidelines for what should go into their Common misconceptions page. I agree the...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete per cystal ball guidelines--Peterdownunder (talk) 04:10, 21 October 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:CRYSTAL...
Click to read more »nominating this one as it fails notability guidelines for organization and general notability guidelines. BRP ever 01:26, 28 October 2021 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »to lose my election to become a sysop. I am going to study wikipedia guidelines and will run again next month. This election has been a major help to...
Click to read more »promote the page to the status of a guideline. Therefore, please contribute, on the talk page of the proposed guideline. Thanks. --Eptalon 08:58, 12 October...
Click to read more »other projects. I see no reason for adminship not to follow the same guidelines in that adminship is granted on request or, perhaps more realistically...
Click to read more »NPP can be kept as a separate right to users who knows the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia. Autopatrolled can be given to NPRs when they are eligible...
Click to read more »Noodly? 13:33, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Delete - doesn't meet notability guidelines and imo isn't notable enough. BG7even 14:20, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »often revert vandalism, so I'm familiar with the usage, policies, and guidelines around rollbacks(xtools:autoedits/ko.wikipedia.org/기나ㅏㄴ/all). I won't...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't meet notability guidelines, only claim is company being award winning. BRP ever 19:42, 4 December...
Click to read more »reliable sources to prove notability. I don't see it meeting the Notability guidelines here. BRP ever 15:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Delete. Did not meet Music notability guidelines and therefore QD. Peterdownunder (talk) 22:13, 13 March 2025 (UTC) Parth...
Click to read more »enough sources to verify the content. Unlikely to meet the notability guidelines. BRP ever 14:33, 7 August 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »Translation is very useful but not significant alone to pass notability guidelines here - fails WP:BLP1E --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 14:24, 1 July 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »simpler: the other word list recommended in the Wikipedia:Simple English Guidelines page, Special English, has a core 1600 word dictionary for international...
Click to read more »are to treat this user as a "school project" then we need to follow the guidelines at Wikipedia:Schools/Teachers' Guide. These may need review but the basic...
Click to read more »podcast which all are very reliable sources. So this page is following the guidelines of Wikipedia as the text is organic and no promotional activities there...
Click to read more »but shouldn't be expected to I don't think. Of course, our policies, guidelines, interface, templates, articles etc should all be in Simple English. Majorly...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Trivia. Does not meet notability (films) guidelines. Information conflicts with another new article submitted for RfD, Opening...
Click to read more »article content they don't seem to meet any of our specific notability guidelines (WP:AUTHOR, WP:NTENNIS, etc.). Sources provided are spammy and doing a...
Click to read more »article on Mexican actress and singer that fails to meet our notability guidelines. Fails w:WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. BRP ever 12:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Fails the relevant notability guidelines for musical groups. Has not been signed to a major label, and none of...
Click to read more »patient information leaflet. Cite peer-reviewed publications, clinical guidelines, and recognised health authorities, not news articles or personal accounts...
Click to read more »guideline about non-admin closures. What makes this wiki interesting to many is that as it is smaller, we need fewer (hard-coded) rules, guidelines and...
Click to read more »But we would like to bump the guideline slightly higher. -DJSasso (talk) 20:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC) So the guideline would be upped to 75%. But what...
Click to read more »titles remaining Those are just options; also the page I changed is a guideline, not a policy. --Eptalon 17:46, 27 May 2007 (UTC) Relief was listed on...
Click to read more »15:25, 26 December 2022 (UTC) I think it should be a guideline. Since Wikipedia:Categories is a guideline (not an advised way to do things, an essay, or a...
Click to read more »alternatives for an article that does not meet Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. They do this before commenting here. Deleting an article is always a...
Click to read more »Amingak (talk) 10:56, 12 December 2023 (UTC) According to the notability guidelines, not all sports competitions show significance. Only the most significant...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Keep – TR.ENERGY appears to meet the notability guidelines for organizations (WP:ORG) as it has received significant attention in...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet our notablity guidelines for music, several references do not support the claims, eg he is not...
Click to read more »to Delete. Consensus to delete on the basis of not meeting notability guidelines. Vermont (talk) 01:26, 28 February 2020 (UTC) Ratna Sarita (edit · talk...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:20, 17 November 2019 (UTC) Delete - Does not meet notability guidelines, and atm only serves to promote with false claims. Vermont (talk) 01:49...
Click to read more »notable people would make this huge and unmanageable. The list has no guidelines for inclusion and no hope of ever being thorough. Pure Evil (talk) 22:52...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: does not seem to meet notability guidelines Tbennert (talk) 05:09, 4 January 2017 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. I suggest it should be deleted because it does not follow the guidelines at WP:User page. Green Giant (talk) 00:07, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »and the popularity is clearly not sufficient for meeting notability guidelines here. BRP ever 17:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »sourced biography about actor and voice actor, may not meet notability guidelines here. Was deleted multiple times in enwiki too (after discussion). BRP...
Click to read more »on makes the cut. Overall, I think the individual fails our notability guidelines for politicians. Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:47, 5 August 2021 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »to meet WP:GNG. There is some coverage but it's not enough to meet our guidelines. BRP ever 14:04, 15 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Notability, the subject does not meet WP guidelines Rus793 (talk) 12:07, 4 July 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »sources and content I couldn't find this person meeting the notability guidelines here. Sources may not be enough to prove notability. Thanks BRP ever 06:15...
Click to read more »for the reason: This article does not establish notability under our guidelines. References are not reliable. Peterdownunder (talk) 23:22, 24 July 2015...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails notability guidelines Milo, Talk, Contribs 22:10, 15 April 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »for notability. Couldn't come across much that would make them meet our guidelines. BRP ever 14:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »it and refer to en.wiki's MOS as I suggested. We do it for many other guidelines and policies, why should this be any different? The Rambling Man on tour...
Click to read more »to simplify templates does require content knowledge. Guidelines: discussions need guidelines. To give you an example from the infobox domain, one might...
Click to read more »article has plenty of sources that show this subject passes notability guidelines: [1][2][3][4][5] --Ferien (talk) 12:08, 24 August 2024 (UTC) Keep – I...
Click to read more »'student projects'. It seems that ones where the instructor gave very clear guidelines, and made sure that attention to Wikipedia style and policy were part...
Click to read more »concepts or processes used by the Wikipedia community. It is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, and may reflect varying levels of consensus....
Click to read more »to follow)". I read somewhere that some of you don't want to give such guidelines, but it seems to me that they can not be avoided. Nevertheless, they could...
Click to read more »deemed needed. --NigelJ talk EN 21:51, 1 April 2007 (UTC) As per the enWP guidelines, the section should always be called External Links, independent of the...
Click to read more »--TBC 23:26, 2 March 2008 (UTC) And, it is not officially accepted as a guideline or policy, although it is not too far from that point. - Huji reply 21:31...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to meet notability guidelines. Bulk of references are from his institutions and not outside. CountryANDWestern...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Fails notability guidelines. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 17:18, 11 December 2024 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails general notability guidelines and was deleted by community consensus in July 2020 on English Wikipedia...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: The subject does not appear to meet the notability guidelines and does not contain any sources to show that this publication has received...
Click to read more »investor known in small circles, not somebody who meets the notability guidelines for our encyclopedia. Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »particular project, however, I feel confident in the project's policy/guidelines that I can be an accurate judge and make a qualified vote, recommendation...
Click to read more »this encyclopedia'. Our community of editors has established a series of guidelines, under the heading "notability", of what is and what is not suitable for...
Click to read more »per the guideline at en:WP:OC#EPONYMOUS. The category contains the article on Wiesel and articles about two of his books. As per the guideline, I added...
Click to read more »that you demonstrate a good understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. It seems to be the consensus here that you have not demonstrated that...
Click to read more »started a new sub-section below for that purpose, as it appears that the guidelines as suggested by Eptalon are ok with most members of the community. If...
Click to read more »AAA. While Wikipedia is not paper, I wonder whether we could get any "guidelines" or "criteria" for including such items? These are of course just my thoughts...
Click to read more »21:45, 8 July 2009 (UTC) I wonder if we can get TRM to write us a set of guidelines for how to review an article? A mini course if you will. fr33kman talk...
Click to read more »Give me a break. Many of your pages don't meet the guidelines. David meets many of the guidelines listed in the "musicbio" page. Video in heavy rotation...
Click to read more »have done projects in the past and have been very careful to follow all guidelines. I will be working with them, so please let me know if you find any problems...
Click to read more »comments. I'm still improving the article in line with the notability guidelines. No, this is not a paid promotional spam. Yes, it's my first article as...
Click to read more »are doing like this in the favour of the subject. They didn't study any guidelines before creating articles. and User:Masum Ibn Musa is removing ad tag as...
Click to read more »incident and both are unreliable. This does not meet the general notability guidelines. 81.109.99.117 (talk) 20:09, 10 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »August 2009 (UTC) Actually there is technically a guideline for this per our "lack of policy/guideline follow en" and en resysops any admin that removes...
Click to read more »all policies and guidelines related to articles on this Wikipedia. If the article writer is able to meet those policies and guidelines, while using AI...
Click to read more »candidate can choose to answer them or not ;) Or we could add them into the guidelines to be answered in the nomination statement? Goblin 22:21, 26 February...
Click to read more »coverage of things than the English Wikipedia, we still have notability guidelines that I am concerned this article does fall short of. Thank you for your...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »experienced editors as well as unregistered visitors. Here's where the guidelines are: Wikipedia:Notability (people). Note that "having an article on English...
Click to read more »editors and in insisting on adherance to policy and the consideration of guidelines but at the same time respecting both WP:BOLD and WP:IAR. fr33kman t -...
Click to read more »notable based on the sources in the article and meets general notability guidelines. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 01:40, 15 October 2021 (UTC) Ashish Chanchlani (edit...
Click to read more »proportion - and that I am partly to blame - and I think now that the guidelines around this tool have been made clearer such an incident won't happen...
Click to read more »sandbox. I do not understand why editors are encouraged to edit a Wikipedia guideline page. --weltforce (talk) 13:03, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Because the tutorial...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines and seems somewhat like self-promotion. Milo, Talk, Contribs 16:44, 15...
Click to read more »This is an information page. It is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, but rather intends to describe some aspect(s) of Wikipedia's norms, customs...
Click to read more »is back! We wish you all the best of luck for the contest. The basic guidelines of the contest can be found on your local page of Wikipedia Asian Month...
Click to read more »participation and socializing. While we can't make decisions, influence guidelines, or attain consensus via IRC, it does help bolster interpersonal rapport...
Click to read more »some of them. (That list is not policy or a guideline, but it references some relevant policies and guidelines.) --Auntof6 (talk) 23:18, 3 March 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete clearly fails all notability guidelines. fr33kman 22:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »has begun... 01:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Delete Fails all notability guidelines. Kk.urban (talk) 23:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »promotional, so it's unclear if the article meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for films (WP:GNG, WP:NFILM). Saroj (talk) 18:50, 14 December 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »deletion, which was declined. I don't see this meeting our notability guidelines. If kept, please make sure to fix the article (links to enwiki etc.) Barras...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: This author doesn't meet notability guidelines (WP:AUTHOR). 207.62.246.62 (talk) 00:06, 5 March 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »Let's Talk! :) 🍁 23:30, 14 October 2020 (UTC) @Thegooduser: The relevant guidelines are Wikipedia:Requirements for good articles and Wikipedia:Requirements...
Click to read more »14 February 2009 (UTC) Maybe if we started an Infobox "Project", or guidelines on designing infoboxes... but more laissez-faire than what it sounds like...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't meet notability guidelines. Most sources are either published by the subject, niche groups that deal...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Don't believe this subject meets our notability guidelines. Many references are just passing mentions, or just listing her name....
Click to read more »notability. It's about whether the person meets the relevant notability guidelines, including WP:GNG. Something could be notable without being featured on...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet the general notability guidelines for an individual article. There's nothing to redirect it to. Osiris (talk)...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet the notability guidelines for sports professionals, having only played in the Regional Leagues in...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails general notability guidelines. A page about a nutritionist and food scientist that has been deleted...
Click to read more »for the reason: Non-notable flight simulator. Doesn't pass notability guidelines. Lithorien Talk • Changes 09:33, 28 June 2016 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to meet the notability guidelines for companies. Doesn't claim notability either, but it's been around for...
Click to read more »(change conflict) (Now I'm using ec?) Oh, and do we have a file for guidelines about refs, inline ones and so forth? :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 03:57, 22 June...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:28, 11 January 2017 (UTC) Keep, per above. Also, there is a guideline w:Wikipedia:Notability (high schools) Rus793 (talk) 17:19, 12 January...
Click to read more »October 2021 (UTC) Delete - mobile video game that doesn't meet notability guidelines for video games. Through a quick Google search, it seems Turkish websites...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Category now meets guidelines.Peterdownunder (talk) 00:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC) Category:Trombones (edit...
Click to read more »notable - is one game more notable than another? I have been looking for guidelines after the poor Moshi Monsters got deleted. Other games eg AdventureQuest...
Click to read more »count them! Wikipedia:How to write Simple English pages - These are the guidelines for how to write a good article here. The Administrators' Noticeboard...
Click to read more »the absence of a demonstrable WP:GNG pass". [GNG is general notability guidelines]. Evidently there is no qualified source to make the needed support. Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »reason: I am nominating this for RFD due to En:WP:NOTWEBHOST, and per the guidelines at WP:UP, I am not sure if this type of page is allowed, so I am asking...
Click to read more »because I don't feel right about unilaterally making a major change to a guideline without a sandbox page), and added a reference to the Cite4Wiki addon...
Click to read more »that I keep. The list itself is not policy or guideline, but it links to some relevant policies and guidelines. Stay a while, learn how we operate here, create...
Click to read more »of this request for deletion was to Delete. Does not meet notability guidelines Peterdownunder (talk) 06:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Dooley Car Rentals (edit...
Click to read more »of this request for deletion was to Delete. Does not meet notability guidelines Peterdownunder (talk) 03:41, 16 June 2021 (UTC) W. Yao Liang (edit · talk...
Click to read more »of this request for deletion was to Delete. Does not meet notablity guidelines. Peterdownunder (talk) 21:46, 20 April 2021 (UTC) Dur Khan (edit · talk...
Click to read more »feeling has been developing a lot overtime and I'm not sure if there's a guideline about not nagging for so much so I leave with an apology. I'm sorry you...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: This article does not meet the notability guidelines. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't...
Click to read more »on the talk page of Latin music: "Although it is not forbidden in our guidelines, I think it extraordinary to copy over such an out-of-date page [18 June...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet notability guidelines. Article is about an event that is not significant, with no lasting effect...
Click to read more »I can't see anything that makes him notable, or meets our notability guidelines. Peterdownunder (talk) 05:17, 8 March 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - fails notability guidelines for music. Milo, Talk, Contribs 12:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC) Comment: Also...
Click to read more »adaptations made me lean toward keep. The clincher was reading the notability guidelines for film. It has "The film features significant involvement (i.e., one...
Click to read more »WP:POLITICIAN "People can be notable if they meet any of the following guidelines ... Politicians and judges who have held international, national or sub-national...
Click to read more »commissioned officer rank) or notary (legal official) is in itself notable to WP guidelines. Rus793 (talk) 19:14, 28 February 2014 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to meet the notability guidelines for films. There is no significant coverage about it online, nothing in...
Click to read more »article); so, for the community to decide: Does this article meet our guidelines, to be keepable. This also means that there's probably a week to put further...
Click to read more »have people that have the ability to hide anything that falls under OS guidelines. Anything else doesn't have to be deleted. ie the typical penis vandalism...
Click to read more »considering the guideline related to this, and an indication that consensus is that this case does not meet point number 3 of the guideline. --IWI (talk)...
Click to read more »This page is a guideline on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many editors agree with the ideas on this page. It is a good idea to follow it, but it is not...
Click to read more »blocking/banning policy as well as dealing with difficult users, policies & guidelines to the wiki, and how to co-operate with the community. Merely reverting...
Click to read more »Zuz (WMF)! I'm interested in this role - I am currently looking the guidelines and the requirements for it. I am however, not as active on weekdays,...
Click to read more »rather than the talk page in order to get more feedback. I think the guideline needs something about how people may unintentionally cause problems because...
Click to read more »Wikipedia articles may seem quite bizarre, and several so-called "official" guidelines are still demanding peculiar rules, years later, with some rules so wiki-spastic...
Click to read more »this explanation. It's good for us to be reminded that we have policies/guidelines on this sort of thing other than "it seems like a good thing to do". --Auntof6...
Click to read more »2018 (UTC) ┌─────────────────────────────────┘ Hello again. We do have a guideline, called Criteria for Adminship. We are a small Wiki, with, I'd guess,...
Click to read more »some of them. PiRSquared17 19:47, 17 May 2010 (UTC) What happened to the guideline of not featuring more than one article of the same subject on the page...
Click to read more »English WP and so does not have to follow its exact rules with article guidelines and layout. A final point: I doubt such a proposal would work, for one...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Delete. as not being notable under our guidelines--Peterdownunder (talk) 21:29, 2 March 2019 (UTC) Luis Alberto Alonso Pastor...
Click to read more »for the reason: Badly formatted page that does not meet the notability guidelines currently that has been here for several months with little to no sign...
Click to read more »failing on general guidelines of notability related to companies. Bredclads (talk) 13:24, 31 August 2018 (UTC) I don't know the exact guideline page but per...
Click to read more »___________." I originally thought "important" should go in that blank, but our guidelines say that notability is not the same as importance. Any ideas/suggestions...
Click to read more »sometimes become too complex over time. In order to address this, per this guideline, the introduction section of all articles must be able to be understood...
Click to read more »Rheumatology Standards, Audit and Guidelines Working, Group. (26 May 2017). "The British Society for Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Gout". Rheumatology...
Click to read more »related subjects. If, in the future, there are valid reasons per Wikipedia guidelines to restore the article, a deletion review should be opened. Best, -Griff...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: The article does not meet notability guidelines for biographies (WP:NBIO). The references are primarily local or niche...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Delete. Doesn't meet our notability guidelines for music Peterdownunder (talk) 22:39, 7 September 2021 (UTC) Rel McCoy...
Click to read more »December 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Nifky! We should always wait, so that the silly meta guideline is met. We have managed to get more than 25 votes before, so it's possible...
Click to read more »writing about future things. Also keep in mind that there are notability guidelines for some types of future events. We want to keep categories such as Category:Future...
Click to read more »a strong application General planning page for Project Grants Program guidelines and criteria Program officers are also available to offer individualized...
Click to read more »additional criteria needs to be met in order to be approved with the Wikipedia guidelines? The objective of writing the biography of Ryan would certainly not be...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete Again, he's fairly close to notability guidelines but not quite. Blissyu2 (talk) 12:25, 20 April 2023 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete as not notable. The guidelines say: "An album requires its own notability, and that notability is not...
Click to read more »for half a year already. I don't see how this battle is notable per our guidelines. Barras talk 17:21, 30 December 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »heavily promotional sources without any good sources. Fails notability guidelines such as WP:GNG. (created on behalf of 2607:f140:6000:816a:ed02:ed81:4c2:7e3e)...
Click to read more »commander= 16:50, 16 April 2009 (UTC) I fully agree, Barras. The official guideline says, "Never edit someone's words to change their meaning, even on your...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet notability guidelines in WP:POLITICIAN. While there does appear to be coverage of this person...
Click to read more »article and ensuring it adheres to Wikipedia’s neutral point of view guidelines, avoiding any promotional content. I will continue to edit the article...
Click to read more »independent sources to better demonstrate notability in line with Wikipedia guidelines. I respectfully suggest allowing time for improvement or draftification...
Click to read more »sourcing guidelines. After some research, I concur with the assessment that the sources contained in the article do not meet our guidelines for either...
Click to read more »notability guideline on athletes only provides some examples, of which he does not meet. That guideline also references enWP's guidelines, and he does...
Click to read more »to Delete. Consensus is that the subject does not meet our notability guidelines. Vermont (talk) 15:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC) Chedi Amir (edit · talk ·...
Click to read more »--Talk-- 14:49, 22 October 2008 (UTC) Note: all topical projects and guidelines (also seen as projects) redirect from "WP:..." for instance WP:SETTLEMENT...
Click to read more »policy or guideline here, we use enwiki's as guidelines. So even if it's a policy there, it's only a guideline here. -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:16, 22 May 2023...
Click to read more »i need help finding a website for chinese ancient navy!!! We can't really help you there, but the people over at the English Reference Desk might be able...
Click to read more »which must surely be read mostly by children. To what extent should the guidelines on language be flexible, so to meet the needs of the audience? In any...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet notability guidelines - see also Yung Trace. Peterdownunder (talk) 00:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »so I'm here at RfD. I don't believe this subject meets our notability guidelines. I'm not seeing any significant third party coverage. Mostly passing mentions...
Click to read more »coming young poet, not yet at the threshold that would meet our notability guidelines. No widespread independent coverage. Gordonrox24 | Talk 03:55, 6 October...
Click to read more »contribs) 04:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC) Keep exceeds the notability guidelines. --IWI (talk) 23:53, 19 November 2020 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: I'm not certain this subject meets out notability guidelines. They appear to now be going under the name "Ashley Smith " Our article...
Click to read more »(talk) 16:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails general notability guidelines --Tbennert (talk) 15:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete does not meet notability guidelines IMO. -Examknowtalk 00:18, 25 April 2020 (UTC) Delete agree that the individual...
Click to read more »Ferrari collector but I don't think this article meets our notability guidelines. Most of the sources are not reliable or don't give clear evidence of...
Click to read more »07:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC) Keep Not breaking any userpage policies or guidelines by the looks of it. When you see a userpage that is questionable, it is...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: The article might not meet the notability guidelines here. Most of the sources are unreliable and might not be enough to prove...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail notability guidelines + sources don't appear to meet appropriate criteria + refbombing Milo...
Click to read more »08:49, 17 September 2022 (UTC) Delete - Subject-specific notability guidelines do not override the GNG, which this road fails. Few reliable or significant...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet the notability guidelines for sports professionals, having only played in the Regional Leagues in...
Click to read more »could find that provide unique notability for him. After looking at the guidelines within WP:NM, I just don't see him meeting that criteria. Griff (talk)...
Click to read more »Jessica Alba is at WP:PVGA with only a day to go under our current PVGA guidelines. She has two supports and no opposes but needs at least three more supports...
Click to read more »make revisions to ensure the article adheres to Wikipedia’s neutrality guidelines and remove non-objective language. 3. Value of the Article: Although the...
Click to read more »written Wikipedia:Requirements for very good articles, which I termed as a guideline; it is also available as WP:VGOOD. So far there is no archive; though...
Click to read more »Simple WP is not yet kid-friendly and that there is no official policy or guideline making it such. So the question is, should Simple WP become kid-friendly...
Click to read more »This is an information page. It is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, but rather intends to describe some aspect(s) of Wikipedia's norms, customs...
Click to read more »notability guideline. This biography was previously deleted on English Wikipedia after an AfD discussion for failing the general notability guideline. Most...
Click to read more »these policies and guidelines The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion. The main four guidelines and policies that inform...
Click to read more »notable content or verifiable sources to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines.--TechnoManni (talk) 08:04, 17 March 2025 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete He's not far off meeting notability guidelines, but not quite there. Maybe in the future he'll get there. Blissyu2 (talk)...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: The subject does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines (WP:GNG, WP:NBIO). The sources all seems to be paid coverage, pretty much...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to fail notability guidelines. This was deleted five days ago on English Wikipedia and now has been...
Click to read more »