Wikipedia is not, and Biographies of living persons. Shortcuts WP:GNGWP:GNG WP:SIGCOVWP:SIGCOV If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 11:12, 3 April 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »merging. Delete fails GNG. —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 10:37, 4 November 2021 (UTC) Delete promotional article that fails GNG. --Ramaswar(discuss) 15:35...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Article was found to meet GNG --Griff (talk) 05:25, 26 April 2022 (UTC) Jay Foreman (comedian) (edit ·...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Fails WP:GNG.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 21:30, 20 September 2022 (UTC) Shaheryar Shafi...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Keep dose pass GNG ""37.255.154.18 (talk) 22:06, 28 March 2021 (UTC)" Delete fails GNG. ShadowBallX (talk) 22:08, 28 March 2021...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Fails GNG and clearly an attempt of promotion. BRP ever 08:45, 28 October 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nlewedim seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:NENT. Looking at English WP's discussion on this person, she seems...
Click to read more »as merging. Delete - Fails GNG, no significant coverage from reliable sources. Found bio listings but those don't pass GNG.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page...
Click to read more »the reason: Can't find any references that seem to indicate they meet WP:GNG. The two on the page are a roster listing announcement and non-independent...
Click to read more »The article is about a not-notable from a not-notable artist. Fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 12:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: does not appear to pass WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 15:18, 8 May 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »merging. Delete per nom, clear fail of GNG.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:10, 2 April 2021 (UTC) Delete You Tubery fails GNG. Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:49, 2 April...
Click to read more »notable person hence doesn't pass WP:GNG आकाशJhaJi 17:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC) Keep - Sources all look fine to me, Passes GNG. –Davey2010Talk 21:15, 12 May 2024...
Click to read more »general notability guideline (WP:GNG) and should be kept. --IsaAlkasir (talk) 10:32, 24 October 2025 (UTC) Delete - Fails GNG and is created by an LTA. CountryANDWestern...
Click to read more »him a presumption of notability in the absence of a demonstrable WP:GNG pass". [GNG is general notability guidelines]. Evidently there is no qualified...
Click to read more »GNG plus it causes no harm to keep it. N1TH Music (talk) 17:12, 14 September 2022 (UTC) N1TH Music, could you show me sources that show it passes GNG...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. Has a reasonable claim that it can "meet the demands of Fortune 500 advertising...
Click to read more »Unsourced BLP is not a reason for deletion. This article fails GNG for other reasons such as under GNG Academics. --Gotanda (talk) 22:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 23:29, 22 July 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »not render any significant coverage; fails WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 22:41, 21 July 2025 (UTC) Delete fails GNG --Cactus🌵 hi ツ 09:07, 22 July 2025 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:31, 26 December 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »merging. Obviously fails GNG. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:25, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Delete this one is quit obvious, does not WP:GNG Wikicontributerr (talk)...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG/w:WP:NFILM. --Ferien (talk) 15:40, 2 October 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Fails WP:GNG. No explanations were given for the claim "National Poet of Pakistan" either...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Delete. Sources given aren't enough to meet WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 15:05, 27 September 2021 (UTC) Ananta Kumar Seram (edit...
Click to read more »13 October 2025 (UTC) Delete, fails GNG. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️🌈) 02:16, 13 October 2025 (UTC) Delete, fails GNG. Redoforest89 (talk) 11:13, 15 October...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 13:52, 16 July 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »the significant coverage expected by GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 19:53, 21 July 2025 (UTC) Delete fails GNG fr33kman 02:14, 22 July 2025 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. RiggedMint 15:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »many pages on the internet, for example places he performed. However, WP:GNG requires "significant coverage" in multiple "reliable sources", which means...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability; does not meet GNG. Also with recent additions it has become obvious advertising. User:Rus793...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Indian actress that fails to meet GNG or en:WP:NACTOR. BRP ever 11:32, 26 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Only routine coverage of age. See also en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grace...
Click to read more »for the reason: Couldn't find enough reliable, independent sources to meet GNG. Only a single interview with its founder. --IWI (talk) 16:49, 12 March 2021...
Click to read more »October 2025 (UTC) Delete does not meet WP:GNG. Ternera (talk) 02:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC) Delete clearly fails GNG fr33kman 04:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No references, appears to fail GNG. Deppty (talk) 16:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request TTP1233 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 09:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »RiggedMint has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, no reliable sources provided. Also has a slight non-npov tone. RiggedMint...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails to show notability per WP:GNG. Sources are weak and mainly self-published (IMDb). Haxorpy (talk) 06:30...
Click to read more »businessman. There is no significant coverage in reliable sources. Page fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 09:03, 2 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »indicating significant coverage. Page has been here since 2016 but fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 09:25, 2 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO, I can't find any sources that show notability. --Ferien (talk)...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Not a notable company. No reliable sources to meet GNG. BRP ever 01:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article fails GNG and ANYBIO having almost no "significant" "third party" coverage from reliable...
Click to read more »the article meet GNG, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:57, 30 March 2025 (UTC) I was an editor of the German page and present proof for GNG was sufficient for...
Click to read more »request DMK-C5 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, mostly created for advertising. And doesn't have enough sources to verify...
Click to read more »merging. Delete - per nom. Not notable - fails GNG. IWI (chat) 16:50, 20 August 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:GNG. See What Women Want Magazine, Tuniscope Magazine...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Not a notable company. No coverage to meet GNG. BRP ever 10:07, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 17:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »Keep easily passes GNG with hundreds of reliable sources covering her. --IWI (talk) 09:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC) Keep passes GNG. ShadowBallX (talk) 12:04...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:53, 29 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »request Hiàn has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. A quick search reveals no substantive coverage of the subject by reliable...
Click to read more »request Aranya has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. The Heraldo de Aragón is only good source that focuses on him. All the others...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Not a notable 'mobile accquisation platform'. Fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 02:11, 15 February 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »about a company that barely has any independent reliable source. Fails WP:GNG and w:WP:NCORP. BRP ever 13:04, 5 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »deletion was to Delete. Keep votes do not explain how the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:N. Clear consensus to delete.Ternera (talk) 14:04, 6 August 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »address the original concern, and doesn't demonstrate how the subject meets WP:GNG.- BRP ever 07:59, 9 June 2025 (UTC) Alex Hormozi (edit · talk · history ·...
Click to read more »6 August 2023 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Illusion Flame (talk) 02:21, 4 August 2023 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG. Bobherry Talk My Changes 21:38, 4 August...
Click to read more »Fails GNG. Justarandomamerican (t • c) 11:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC) edited by alt 19:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC) Delete per nom. This fails GNG. No good...
Click to read more »Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Clearly fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 19:55, 17 March 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete fails WP:GNG--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 11:37, 7 August 2024 (UTC) Delete Per first nomination...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Hiàn (talk) 21:52, 22 April 2020 (UTC) Delete Fail WP:GNG Operator873talkconnect 22:54, 29 April 2020...
Click to read more »deletion was to Delete. Consensus is that the article does not meet WP:GNG. The sources mentioned do not show notability for the author. Having a poem...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete clear fail of WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 01:05, 13 July 2025 (UTC) Delete - failed GNG for lack of sources Mrfixer2024 (talk) 19:33...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable caste, Fails GNG –Davey2010Talk 16:50, 11 January 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 19:41, 25 December 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 17:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG - note they are a different Kumar Gaurav to w:Kumar Gaurav. --Ferien (talk)...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 20:52, 12 June 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: No notable things about this person. Fails WP:GNG. – Angerxiety! 11:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable invasion, Fails GNG –Davey2010Talk 22:34, 22 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to fail WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 14:07, 24 April 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »discussion below, I'm not entirely convinced this still meets NFILM and GNG but the sources to me seem fine and there's an article on the Telugu Wikipedia...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail NACTOR and GNG. --IWI (talk) 23:05, 25 March 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail GNG. They came second in a competition which could be considered a claim to notability...
Click to read more »- no evidence of any notability, fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 20:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Delete Easily fails GNG. ShadowBallX (talk) 20:43, 19 March 2021...
Click to read more »Appears to fail GNG, The article was originally tagged as G1 by Haftevanian who's claiming the article is AI/LLM content[1], Anyway fails GNG –Davey2010Talk...
Click to read more »Sources are just mentions with no substantial coverage. The page fails GNG. BRP ever 10:24, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG and is basically a copy of Fuad Al Jabir, just with a few words different...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:30, 9 October 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »for the reason: I was unable to find sufficient in depth coverage to meet GNG. There doesn’t appear to be any independent coverage specifically about this...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG, also see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lene Bausager --Ferien (talk)...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Nope, fails GNG, not notable.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 09:46, 1 January 2024 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. See also en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashish Vijay Barras talk 21:56...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unlikely to meet WP:GNG or any other notability criteria. BRP ever 04:05, 27 July 2025 (UTC) Hi!...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 19:58, 14 November 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 18:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »for the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG. Not a reliable person Shoot for the Stars (talk) 10:20, 31 March 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »request A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 06:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 16:36, 26 March 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:49, 27 June 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »reason: There is no significant coverage of this person. Does not meet the WP:GNG. Garsh (talk) 14:18, 7 July 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »polo player, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NPLAYER and GNG –Davey2010Talk 13:14, 19 March 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: As secondary school, I don't think it meets WP:GNG Barras talk 20:52, 1 June 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request below, but...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable enough to meet WP:GNG, because the sources aren't independent enough. Kk.urban (talk) 17:54, 1...
Click to read more »request Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG, no reliable sources that provide significant coverage of the subject. —...
Click to read more »cannot find any evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 11:06, 14 August 2024 (UTC) Delete fails GNG. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 16:35, 18 August...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DSLinux. --Ferien (talk |...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail w:en:WP:NSCHOOL/WP:GNG --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:31, 8 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG. Only coverage I can find is about his death. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!)...
Click to read more »presented in the RfD do not show the significant coverage we would expect per WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 13:08, 5 July 2025 (UTC) Ann Howard Creel (edit...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Not notable musician. Appears to fail WP:GNG. DIVINE 06:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below, but...
Click to read more »CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to fail GNG. Nominated for an award but not a recipient of it. CountryANDWestern (talk)...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable individual. Fails GNG. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 17:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »local news sources with in depth articles. So they could very well meet GNG. I assume you have actually looked through them and search for others per...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Doesn’t pass the WP:ANYBIO, nor the WP:GNG. 🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN (💬) 09:26, 18 September 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable. Fails GNG. Barras talk 22:33, 28 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »nom - No evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 10:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG --आकाशJhaJi 15:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »all I can see the sources are interviews and pr. Fails WP:NMUSICIAN and WP:GNG as well. 🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN (💬) 06:51, 23 September 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 22:30, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: No notable roles, doesn't pass WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Garsh (talk) 04:20, 22 March 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails, WP:GNG. Looks like UPE. BRP ever 21:49, 24 June 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete as failing both WP:GNG and WP:ENT. Hiàn (talk) 20:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC) Delete She is an Xvideos...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 22:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Did not find any sources that meet WP:GNG. Nothing in depth. Just a passing mention. DJSasso (talk) 16:48, 15 August...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This band seems to fail WP:GNG as far as I can tell. Sources may be in Romanian. Batrachoseps (talk) 18:50...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 20:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »notable person, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NPERSON and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 19:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »request Fr33kman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG as company and reads as promotional, does make a claim of notability but...
Click to read more »request Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. AFD on endwiki. Barras talk 20:21, 26 June 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »PotsdamLamb has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG as well as en:WP:AUTHOR. This is just a list of books but meets no requirements...
Click to read more »from both sides, the keep !votes did not sufficiently address the issue of GNG, particularly significant coverage of the subject.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable enough. fails GNG, also article had couple unreliable sources such as Blogs and Youtube links...
Click to read more »as stated above, fails WP:GNG PieWriter (talk) 00:51, 17 December 2025 (UTC) While I understand the concern regarding WP:GNG, I would like to clarify that...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, all sources are completely promotional. --Ferien (talk) 16:43, 5 November...
Click to read more »entrepreneur, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NPERSON and GNG –Davey2010Talk 17:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: This individual is not notable as defined by WP:GNG and WP:PEOPLE. The only independent reliable sources present do not significantly...
Click to read more »from those in favour of it. It appears to meet notability requirements, GNG at the most basic. Issues of bias are not handled at RfD, and the issues...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 21:59, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: The subject does not seem to be notable per WP:GNG. No in-depth coverage of the subject in independent, reliable sources....
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - Fails GNG, no significant coverage or notable enough roles.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 22:24, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. I'm unable to find independent sources that mention it using Google. Ternera...
Click to read more »fail WP:GNG. Ternera (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC) Delete per Ternera, No article exists at EN (en:Maheshacharya), Seems to fail GNG. --–Davey2010Talk...
Click to read more »software engineer. I can't find anything that would indicate they meet WP:GNG. Djsasso (talk) 12:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 15:36, 20 January 2026 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. I do not think being in a 5000 fastest growing companies list proves notability...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 14:56, 11 August 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG, frankly could easily be A4 too but considering it's been about for a year...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:CORP. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NIX (company)...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 08:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Littlebite hoax article, Fails GNG, first and second sources only mentioning the the name of Ranjit Yadav and...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 15:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG, also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/12 Apostles (record label)...
Click to read more »ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. The article itself is full of unreliable or dead sources. Not notable. --IWI...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 10:03, 24 October 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet the WP:GNG or en:WP:WEB guidelines. There is no significant coverage from reliable sources...
Click to read more »not give any significant or reliable coverage that would make this pass GNG. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 00:33, 6 May 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. No significant roles, sourcs mainly mention family members...
Click to read more »for the reason: Created by a glocked spammer and UPE, see [1]. Fails WP:GNG. KBDell2 (talk) 22:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »WP:SPORTBASIC and I can't find any sources that would make me think she passes WP:GNG. If she eventually plays in the Olympics/World Championships or otherwise...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable. Fails GNG Barras talk 20:39, 31 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request below,...
Click to read more »No significant coverage in reliable sources that is required in WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:58, 12 December 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 21:05, 3 January 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep I think this person passes GNG as they are well-known within their sphere of interest, are known for multiple...
Click to read more »Not enough of the coverage should be counted as "independent" to meet WP:GNG. 65.182.226.56 (talk) 02:20, 21 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »request TTP1233 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, not notable DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 17:18, 11 August...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, search results just come up with social media and this wikipedia page.....
Click to read more »doesn't meet the criteria. Nothing in the article can indicate notablity via GNG / ANYBIO. Non english sources cannot be evaluated for notablity (at least...
Click to read more »other than her being arrested, and that too seems to be in a group. Fails GNG. BRP ever 00:11, 5 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »since 2004. Does not meet sports person GNG and being part of a national team no longer applies since 2021. WP:GNG not met. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please...
Click to read more »request Jeff G. has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, quite miserably. Has no verifiable reliable sources. — Jeff G. ツ 04:38...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 15:00, 12 February 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete appears to fail WP:GNG. The article mentions they were a politician, but makes no mention of if...
Click to read more »count towards GNG Interviews are not independent of the subject, would not count towards GNG. Not in-depth, would not count towards GNG. In conclusion...
Click to read more »Written like a promotion. Linked references lead to dead pages. Fails WP:GNG. Ternera (talk) 14:03, 24 September 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »sufficient to meet en:WP:ANYBIO#1 and there are enough sources to justify basic GNG. GNG isn't based on sourcing in the page anyway, there are enough press coverage...
Click to read more »while her academic profile alone is borderline, i think she establishes GNG through her media and broadcasting career,. For example, serving as a core...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable businessman. Fails WP:GNG Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Kelblizz (2nd nomination)...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 18:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »search engines do not lead to relevant reliable sources, may not pass WP:GNG. MathXplore (talk) 12:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »AVG555 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet WP:GNG and has no WP:RS showing anything significant, notable, or encyclopedic AVG555...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSICIAN. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skip (singer)...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable person, fails GNG fr33kman 19:19, 3 July 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this request below, but...
Click to read more »Fails wp:GNG and is a en:wp:PERMASTUB Plutus 💬 🎃 — Fortune favors the curious 13:05, 22 September 2025 (UTC) Delete WP:BIO1E, fails WP:GNG.🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, three professional appearances. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:11, 12 March...
Click to read more »of the GNG is violated? Otherwise you are just !voting. To count you have to point out a guideline violation. Come up with a quote from the GNG of the...
Click to read more »be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Fails GNG. currently plays in (what I can tell), a second-tier regional league in India...
Click to read more »just to be safe. I can't find any evidence that this person passes the WP:GNG Garsh (talk) 04:18, 22 March 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be notable. Fails WP:GNG with zero Google news results whatsoever --IWI (talk) 20:13, 12 January 2021...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable company. Fails WP:GNG and en:WP:NORG. BRP ever 14:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »request SaneFlint has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG criteria as article is surviving with the only source. ,also Suggesting an...
Click to read more »request Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG. Sources don't indicate notability, and there are no independent in-depth...
Click to read more »notable company, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NCORP and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 19:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »else delete per nom.--Ksy 21:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG/w:WP:NORG with a complete lack of reliable independent sources on the article...
Click to read more »request A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 09:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: It appears to fail WP:GNG DIVINE 15:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below, but keep...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Was deleted as an A4 but there are numerous claims to notabiltiy here. --Ferien...
Click to read more »Bensebgli has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable, fail GNG and its a district based list of people many of them not belong to this district...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, fails GNG. For the record, an article for this subject went through an RfD around six...
Click to read more »an admin/admins are seeing some notability here) so listing here, Fails GNG –Davey2010Talk 18:24, 28 March 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Our articles is the first mention on google. Barras talk 21:59, 5 June 2025...
Click to read more »Subject fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 10:10, 5 May 2024 (UTC) Delete as outlined above. Yottie =talk= 19:13, 5 May 2024 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG --Michaelglassy...
Click to read more »notable culture, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails DICDEF and GNG –Davey2010Talk 18:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:04, 14 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »sources on the article do not show notability for the album under the WP:GNG. A search did not reveal any others. Garsh (talk) 21:46, 19 April 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »as merging. I'll start the ball rolling... This small page fails several GNG points, especially: The sources are not multiple or secondary or significant...
Click to read more »request Aranya has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG due to a lack of coverage in reputable publications. The article's sources...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG - not to be confused with en:Usha Kiran. --Ferien (talk) 21:29, 3 January...
Click to read more »Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail GNG. --Ferien (talk) 19:18, 17 March 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 15:40, 4 May 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable bio. Fails WP:GNG --Hulged (talk) 09:16, 27 September 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »min movie. I will say this isn't notable per en:WP:NCORP, neither by WP:GNG Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:23, 15 January 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Fails GNG. For reference, previous RfDs: Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Mayank...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 17:04, 31 July 2025 (UTC) I am the subject of...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG, note this is not the same person as en:Aleksei Antonov. --Ferien (talk)...
Click to read more »request BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG, and I don't see any other claims. Search results are mostly social media...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - Not notable, fails GNG. Deppty (talk) 10:41, 8 April 2022 (UTC) Delete, not enough sources to pass GNG. --2600:1700:5EC1:4010:958D:6B06:CBF8:E97B...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: appears to fail NACTOR and GNG. --IWI (talk) 22:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:05, 7 December 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG. Not clear if w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Jay Berman is about...
Click to read more »Delete - Clearly fails WP:GNG. – Cyber.Eyes.2005Talk 19:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC) Delete as very clearly fails WP:GNG. –Davey2010Talk 17:01, 6 September...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG - some interesting claims but can find no evidence or references for them...
Click to read more »Mastashat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP: GNG. No significant coverage of her title, "Architect" Mastashat (talk) 01:27...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The subject fails WP:GNG as it isn't even mentioned in any sources provided in the article, and I...
Click to read more »17:45, 17 March 2023 (UTC) (change conflict) Delete – clear fail of WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 17:47, 17 March 2023 (UTC) Administrator note: I have blocked...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Not enough to show this person meets WP:GNG or WP:NBIO. Most sources are passing mentions or Shafique. Of the three that...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete as they fail the GNG criteria, and looks promotional. SHB2000 (talk) 01:29, 10 October 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »NACTOR and GNG. --–Davey2010Talk 17:39, 29 November 2024 (UTC) Delete As nominator noted, there's nothing in the article to show that NACTOR or GNG is met...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No WP:RS, fails WP:GNG, and WP is WP:NOTCRYSTAL AVG555(talk) 19:15, 17 January 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »from my read, w:en:WP:NGEO doesn't cover them - so this would default on WP:GNG, that it doesn't pass. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:44, 15 September 2025...
Click to read more »enough to make the subject notable. That means this page needs to meet WP:GNG which is unlikely. BRP ever 10:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Sources are a mix of primary sources, self-published blogs,...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The subject of this page fails GNG, unsourced, nothing special about this, also just an extensive list of the...
Click to read more »Not a notable band. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources to meet GNG. BRP ever 02:06, 1 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: No evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010Talk 15:30, 2 March 2025 (UTC) The article was nominated for deletion...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable company, Fails NCORP and GNG –Davey2010Talk 00:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »NMUSIC, Fails en:WP:NMUSIC and en:WP:GNG. –Davey2010Talk 17:26, 30 January 2025 (UTC) Delete Not notable, fails GNG. 𝓐𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓲𝓭𝓮 (𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴 ♡ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓼)...
Click to read more »international player, and took part in only five first-class matches, so fails WP:GNG. The article was created immediately after his death was reported in the...
Click to read more »justify an article here and few third-party sources on the Internet. Fails WP:GNG. Hiàn (talk) 15:22, 8 December 2018 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »was introduced to the article - as it stands, the subject seems to fail GNG, so voting for delete on those grounds. Chenzw Talk 13:55, 28 June 2020...
Click to read more »the reason: Can’t find many in depth sources online. I believe he fails WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 13:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Does not seem like a notable individual, fails WP:GNG PieWriter (talk) 10:15, 20 January 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »with incredibly weak sourcing, I do believe this should be deleted per WP:GNG. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kendra Lust. --Ferien (talk...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Little notability which seems to fail GNG, see also en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arat Hosseini Naleksuh (talk)...
Click to read more »Justarandomamerican has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG. Sources appear to be insignificant. Justarandomamerican (t • c) 07:48, 1...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Not notable per en:WP:1E. Also fails WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 19:16, 11 January 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »(per GNG) — Koster played in the highest Dutch league and was a “known player” according to the Encyclopedia of Drenthe (read here). Meeting GNG as he...
Click to read more »hand, and an online search will simply show social media. Clearly fails WP:GNG, to me. --Ferien (talk) 18:37, 9 October 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »SaneFlint has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: clearly fails (GNG). Additionally, the information provided about the subject is poorly referenced...
Click to read more »does not appear to be notable. There's no sources that help it pass the WP:GNG Garsh (talk) 19:20, 19 May 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this request below,...
Click to read more »any notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 23:43, 21 March 2024 (UTC) Quick delete can we just put a4 instead? Clearly fails GNG just because it died in...
Click to read more »doesn't cover topic to the significant extent or aren't reliable to meet GNG. Thanks,--BRP ever 16:10, 12 June 2025 (UTC) Delete I agree with BRPever...
Click to read more »TyphoonAmpil has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Falls WP:GNG one source only TyphoonAmpil (talk) 06:37, 31 August 2024 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »request Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG for me. Not much on google either. Barras talk 21:29, 5 June 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »Michaelglassy has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG Also Both users Bamalli01 Lagwai having similar behaviour as they are removing...
Click to read more »person meets WP:GNG. Doesn’t appear to be a reason to delete. --IWI (talk) 10:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC) Keep Enough sources to meet GNG. -Djsasso (talk)...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Contested A4, appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 06:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »results are non-American companies with similar name. Does this meet WP:GNG ? MathXplore (talk) 08:12, 14 August 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »would say the subject fails GNG & creative person guidelines. JW 1961 Talk 22:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC) Delete fails WP:GNG with very little coverage, and...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 21:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Simply doesn't pass gng. Gordonrox24 | Talk 02:17, 24 April 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »not proven in that role. The sources on this wiki do not contribute to WP:GNG at all - the first one is a simple profile and the second one is an interview...
Click to read more »WP:GNG.Bensebgli (Talk) 06:34, 15 April 2025 (UTC) Delete Edit wars have been happening too much, and fails a sense of notability and fails GNG. ⭐ Adelaide...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable; fails WP:GNG. Similar article about the subject previously deleted under A4. Ternera (talk)...
Click to read more »to the table but you are still lacking any references that count towards GNG. The sources all focused in on the website and this article is not about...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Fails WP:GNG, but indeed doesn't fall under A4. --Ferien (talk) 21:30, 20 March 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »reason: Subject may not meet the criteria for Notability and possibly fails WP:GNG. There are claims of notability in the Award section, but no sources are...
Click to read more »paid-for-adverts (newswire). Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 10:36, 23 August 2024 (UTC) References Steve, Paris (6 March...
Click to read more »delete so can't G4 this page and have to send to RfD again. Clearly fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 16:08, 17 March 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:32, 4 September 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dom Okon. Seems not notable. Fails WP:GNG. Barras talk 06:24, 28 May 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request below,...
Click to read more »Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Continues to fail GNG. The last RfD was a discussion that probably should have been left to settle...
Click to read more »reason: No notable. No independent coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG BRP ever 14:39, 6 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below,...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 22:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »complete hoax, and the title seems fabricated (verified). There’s little to no GNG to back it up. The article talks about a possible marriage alliance between...
Click to read more »Wikipedia’s notability guidelines, especially the General Notability Guideline (GNG). The subject has received significant, non-trivial coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »request Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG. Nothing that suggests reliable, independent or significant coverage. — *Fehufangą...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. Nominated for PROD on enwiki. --Ferien (talk) 15:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 14:08, 16 July 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 19:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »reason: Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Sources are of poor quality and don't seem to meet the requirements of GNG. Djsasso (talk) 18:17, 20 September...
Click to read more »Mastashat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP: GNG Mastashat (talk) 19:15, 3 January 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »show this person meets WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Ravensfire (talk) 18:18, 27 February 2024 (UTC) Delete This article fails GNG. On top of that, the sources...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG, also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tory Green (entrepreneur)...
Click to read more »request Fr33kman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, non-notable player but claims made fr33kman 03:53, 14 July 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »programs aren't eligible for A4. Sending to RfD as this appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 10:25, 12 March 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »Tanbiruzzaman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG or WP:NSONG. There is no substantial coverage in significant secondary sources...
Click to read more »Delete - Fails GNG. Deppty (talk) 12:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC) seems to be enough reliable sources and routine coverage. but, why fails GNG? --142.197.240...
Click to read more »Delete as they fail the GNG criteria. SHB2000 (talk) 11:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC) Delete as per Macdonald-ross, and fails gng 23stan (talk) 09:37, 13...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: I fail to see this person meeting WP:GNG. Barras talk 17:32, 14 September 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »while we don't delete articles based on their creators, this one fails WP:GNG by a long shot. Absolutely no coverage at all. --IWI (talk) 19:46, 23 September...
Click to read more »I cannot find their name anywhere on the MTV source. Appears to fail WP:GNG. DIVINE 21:09, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below, but...
Click to read more »reason: Notability contested. I don't think this artist is notable. Fails GNG, and the sources that come up appear to be promotional, not independent,...
Click to read more »ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail GNG and NACTOR. --IWI (talk) 10:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Fails all four points of en:WP:CREATIVE, as well as WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 13:17, 11 January 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 20:25, 14 April 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - Fails GNG.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 07:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable producer. Fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 01:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 14:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 16:01, 2 October 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 15:12, 2 October 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable company. Fails GNG. BRP ever 06:27, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 13:35, 16 October 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 06:43, 21 October 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 21:01, 25 October 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 15:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 18:59, 30 September 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »request Belwine has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG —Belwine (talk) 09:47, 7 March 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 22:14, 25 November 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 19:43, 25 November 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 22:16, 25 November 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Promotional article about an app that fails GNG. BRP ever 12:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable organization. Fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 00:21, 5 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable actor, fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 22:19, 9 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 19:24, 25 November 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 21:10, 21 November 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 19:25, 25 November 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 19:03, 23 October 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person. Fails GNG. —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 10:52, 10 September 2021 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 21:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 16:32, 21 November 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Not a notable entrepreneur and inventor. Fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 12:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 17:16, 28 September 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 15:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. And I will take the description from w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountasser...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep – Appears to meet both WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR, with roles in television series and films. Multiple independent...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable person per WP:GNG. The coverage is either not significant or not from independent sources 205...
Click to read more »presumed for roads, and they are only considered notable if they meet GNG. To meet GNG, it is expected that "multiple sources" provide significant coverage...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: not a notable programmer and author. The page fails GNG. BRP ever 13:13, 30 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 10:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: appears to fail WP:GNG. There are two sources in the article, one doesn't work and one is behind...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The page doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:SOLDIER. Page was deleted on enwiki after an AFD. Wikipedia is not...
Click to read more »notable. There are no sources pointing towards wide coverage to meet WP:GNG. BRP ever 12:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:GNG as they're Notable Globally, However i can't take their notability for guaranteed whether if The Subject satisfies Wikipedia:GNG or not Per...
Click to read more »subpage Aurafish has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG. The available sources appear to consist primarily of routine coverage, interviews...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. Claims to have won an award so not notable for A4. --Ferien (talk) 16:12...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: not a notable company. The page fails GNG, and looks promotional. BRP ever 12:53, 29 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »massive cultural and economic impact within the web gaming ecosystem. Per WP:GNG, if a single source provides significant, in-depth independent coverage with...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Reads promotional. Fails to meet GNG or any other notability criteria from what I see. BRP ever 03:38, 19 July...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG/w:WP:NARTIST. I did note the claim that "MIT gave him the First Annual Distinguished...
Click to read more »request Belwine has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Belwine (talk) 20:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »Liverpool Echo, Leeds Live) are general gossipy-crap, Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG –Davey2010Talk 19:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 18:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't really seem to meet GNG here, fails or notability criteria for music artist. Likely not notable and...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG (claims to have won an award so not eligible for A4) --Ferien (talk) 13:09...
Click to read more »appears this was part of a group created en-mass with no signs of meeting WP:GNG. A WP:BEFORE only brings up his social media accounts and a couple of pictures...
Click to read more »shows up with a simple google search is IMDb and social media. Fails the WP:GNG. Garsh (talk) 04:54, 16 June 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 20:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG and w:WP:NATHLETE. --Ferien (talk) 21:57, 1 October 2022 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail w:WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 19:31, 25 November 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 19:34, 25 November 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail w:WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 19:36, 25 November 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG and w:WP:NCOMPANY --Ferien (talk) 12:01, 4 December 2022 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 20:37, 26 August 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG and w:WP:NJOURNALIST. --Ferien (talk) 15:43, 2 October 2022 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail w:WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 19:31, 25 November 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail w:WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 20:24, 25 November 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »request Hiàn has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Only claim to notability is for breaking a world record. Very few substantive...
Click to read more »ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail GNG --IWI (talk) 22:46, 11 March 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep: The article meets WP:GNG and Notability (people) policy. Multiple independent and reliable media sources...
Click to read more »Fr33kman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails NACTOR & GNG fr33kman 01:51, 24 July 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this request below, but...
Click to read more »subpage Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Ternera (talk) 15:23, 23 September 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »Person fails WP:NACTOR. -Barras talk 00:21, 3 May 2026 (UTC) Keep Passes WP:GNG with significant independent reliable sources. Notability established.SocerTabe...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: No sources indicating significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. Doesn't appear to meet any other criteria. BRP ever 01:00, 5 November 2021...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, I don't think this is notable enough for a redirect. --Ferien (talk) 19:16...
Click to read more »request Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG, definitely not the largest coffee shop chain in the world. — *Fehufangą...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Lacks significant coverage to pass GNG. Wikipedia is not a memorial. BRP ever 11:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Not a notable blogger and scholar. the page fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 15:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »the reason: Not notable. Claims aren't significant and the person fails GNG. BRP ever 06:00, 28 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails en:WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Claims with no reliable sources, and a quick look lead to no reliable sources...
Click to read more »request BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Sources are unreliable, promotional or primary. BRP ever 12:35...
Click to read more »request BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG. Looks like another promotional attempt. Likely paid editing or COI. BRP...
Click to read more »the reason: Not a notable scientist. Lacks significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. BRP ever 14:02, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »the reason: Not a notable music artist. No significant coverage to pass GNG. BRP ever 13:15, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable organization. Fails WP:GNG and en:WP:NORG. BRP ever 14:19, 27 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 22:14, 25 November 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »request BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG. No significant coverage in independent source found. The article is somewhat...
Click to read more »reason: Important suspect of a case, but not sure how this one meets WP:GNG or any other criteria we have. BRP ever 01:22, 9 November 2021 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Not a notable businessman and investor. The page fails GNG. Likely another promotional/paid article. BRP ever 06:39, 31 October 2021...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK. --Ferien (talk) 21:27, 13 September 2022 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »No sources are given for their works, recognition etc. Possibly fails WP:GNG. MathXplore (talk) 14:06, 4 September 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »request BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and en:WP:NMUSICIAN. Page about a music artist who is not notable. BRP ever...
Click to read more »for the reason: 22-year-old American tech entrepreneur, that doesn't meet GNG. No reliable sources to make the article notable. BRP ever 11:12, 26 October...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail w:WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 19:37, 25 November 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »chairperson of the Electoral Commission with some coverage, but not enough to meet GNG IMO. BRP ever 11:29, 26 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable video game. Fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 21:02, 7 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: does not appear to pass WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 17:03, 8 May 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail en:WP:SINGER and WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 00:14, 3 April 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Don't see how this subject passes GNG. Looks like a local businessman with no wider reach. Gordonrox24 | Talk 22:32...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: No significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG and en:WP:NORG. BRP ever 14:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable public figure. Fails GNG and doesn't meet any of our other notability criteria. BRP ever 03:40, 28...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, being someone notable's spouse doesn't make you notable. --Ferien (talk)...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 20:40, 26 August 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to pass WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 10:58, 31 May 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »Doesn't appear to be a notable event. Lack of significant coverage to meet GNG. BRP ever 09:28, 30 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable historian. The page fails GNG as there don't seem to be multiple reliable sources. BRP ever 12:43, 29 October...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: appears to fail WP:GNG and w:WP:NFILM --Ferien (talk) 09:49, 26 June 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG and w:WP:NFILM. --Ferien (talk) 15:49, 2 October 2022 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »reason: Likely paid editing. Not a notable businessman, and the page fails GNG. BRP ever 23:00, 28 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »own, as per all the references available it does clears the borderline of GNG, and those coverages shows that his songs got enough media attention and...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable per WP:GNG. DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 15:48, 22 August 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »claimed to be notable for websites and stories. None of the sources fulfill GNG or BIO. Seems spammy too. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:10, 27 October 2021...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - Does not meet GNG or ENT. @微甜微酸微苦＿＿微鹹: This has nothing to do with Bollywood vs. Hollywood, the ENT/GNG criteria is applied equally, and...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 20:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »notability, Sources in the article are all SELFPUBLISHED, Fails NCORP and GNG, (Just noting NSCHOOL would be irrelevant as it's a yoga place not a high...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails GNG --Ferien (talk) 20:13, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »from being notable. Official does not mean notable. The article fails WP:GNG. Furthermore, we are not discussing the content of other wikis. You need...
Click to read more »urban has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: May not meet WP:GNG or en:WP:NCORP. Coverage is almost all promotional. Kk.urban (talk) 20:44...
Click to read more »references are full of social-media sites like linkedin, youtube, etc. Fail WP:GNG. Jyoti Roy (talk) 08:23, 31 December 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »requirement of the GNG, yet you vaguely claim it passes with nothing to back that up. It would have to put forth a Herculean effort to fail the GNG more miserably...
Click to read more »request A09 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, also contains lots of spam links A09 (talk) 09:32, 7 August 2023 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable actress. Page fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 02:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »as a whole. I can't find anything in the media and thus feel it fails WP:GNG Fixing26 (talk) 19:14, 25 June 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »person has to be covered by international media as well to create a page? GNG states there should be significant coverage in reliable sources. She is a...
Click to read more »who doesn't appear to be notable. The sources aren't independent. Fails GNG. BRP ever 06:54, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable singer. Fails GNG Blissyu2 (talk) 05:42, 7 December 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: A long list with no sources. Fails GNG and there aren't any other claims. Looks like a person doing his job. BRP...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: The subject does not seem to meet WP:GNG. Vermont (talk) 00:28, 5 August 2019 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 20:39, 26 August 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request Hulged has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Non-notable. --Hulged (talk) 04:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »the reason: Doesn't appear to be a notable music artist/ singer. Fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 07:35, 1 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request ShadowBallX has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG and NFOOTY (only played in the Japanese Regional League/4th tier of Japan)...
Click to read more »been addressed and the subject of the article does indeed appear to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 21:50, 29 September 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »reason: Appears to fail en:WP:NGRIDIRON and en:WP:NCOLLATH; as well as WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 23:35, 2 April 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Fails WP:GNG and doesn't seem to meet any other criteria here. A copy of rejected draft...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable businessman. Page Fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 07:57, 2 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Non-notable football player. Possible hoax. Fails GNG Blissyu2 (talk) 10:37, 28 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Some coverage but not significant enough to meet GNG. And the claims aren't enough to meet any other criteria that we have. BRP...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 10:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail NAUTHOR and GNG. He is a CEO of a company that doesn't appear to be notable itself. --IWI...
Click to read more »request ShadowBallX has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG and NFOOTY (only played in the Japanese Regional League/4th tier of Japan)...
Click to read more »request ShadowBallX has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG and NFOOTY (only played in the Japanese Regional League/4th tier of Japan)...
Click to read more »the reason: No significant coverage except a few announcements. Fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 13:23, 7 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request ShadowBallX has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG and NFOOTY (only played in an amateur league) ShadowBallX (talk) 14:03, 18...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Not there yet. Lacks significant coverage to meet WP:GNG and the claims aren't significant enough to make the person notable. BRP...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG, might be a hoax. --Ferien (talk) 17:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable music artist. Page Fails GNG. Part of ongoing promotional attempts. BRP ever 06:26, 1 November 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »been addressed and the subject of the article does indeed appear to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 21:53, 29 September 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »YouTuber, voice actor, actor, producer, writer, and director. The page fails GNG. I couldn't come across anything much in my search. BRP ever 06:48, 31 October...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG – "Lake Como" related, like all the others I've recently posted onto RfD...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Not a notable training Program. Page Fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 12:56, 6 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »claimed. However, the awards aren't significant enough and the page fails GNG. BRP ever 13:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: An article about a music composer who fails GNG. I don't think the article meets any of our other criterias here. BRP ever...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No significant coverage to meet GNG, doesn't meet any other notability criteria. The claims made in the article...
Click to read more »Vermont has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet GNG. Vermont (talk) 18:10, 3 December 2018 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 10:18, 9 October 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The page fails to meet GNG, and just having an album nominated for the JUNO awards doesn't give someone...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG, can only find this Wikipedia page, social media, IMdB and YouTube when searching...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Reads like an ad. Nothing on Google. Fails GNG Blissyu2 (talk) 13:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 19:03, 3 March 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 06:14, 15 September 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »includes numerous cited sources that adhere to Simple Wiki's guidelines: WP:GNG, if a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't demonstrate notability. Fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 02:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »about a person who doesn't appear to be notable. The page, as it is, fails GNG. BRP ever 09:16, 28 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG, it might be best to have a redirect to Star Wars. --Ferien (talk) 20:47...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to meet GNG and appears to maybe be spam. Djsasso (talk) 15:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »reason: An article about a stage actor that IMO fails en:WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Barely any sources in the article, and I couldn't find much outside. BRP...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete no independent coverage on the film; fails WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 22:40, 25 March 2021 (UTC) This request is due to close on...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: An unsourced article that fails GNG. The only claim here is her role in a notable soap opera, but that in itself...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable politician, fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 00:04, 15 February 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »notable businessman. No significant coverage in reliable sources to meet GNG. BRP ever 07:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »enwiki after multiple times after multiple RFDs. Fails W:WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Not an elected candidate, no other significant coverage. Thanks BRP ever...
Click to read more »official website presented in the article doesn't look very official. Fails GNG. BRP ever 15:48, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »the reason: Not a notable businessman. No real coverage or claim. Fails GNG. BRP ever 06:58, 1 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »for the reason: not a notable entrepreneur and businessman, the page fails GNG, and looks like another PR attempt. From what I see, it could likely be paid...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG - no reliable sources in the article or online - and no claim to notability...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Non-notable entrepreneur who seems to fail WP:GNG. Most of the article's sources look like they focus on his company Powtoon...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: No significant coverage, no reliable sources. Fails GNG. BRP ever 01:40, 1 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »guidelines. There is no in-depth coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. BRP ever 16:02, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable software. The page fails GNG. BRP ever 01:25, 1 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG. The only claim in the article is the direction of several successful movies...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG. Ternera (talk) 15:41, 19 March 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG pretty clearly. The claims of him being "the greatest world famous A-List...
Click to read more »event. In addition, there appears to not be sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 19:29, 11 January 2021 (UTC) IWI, you keep mentioning paid...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicola Paparusso (2nd nomination)...
Click to read more »it's soon to have stand-alone article, i mean the subject can't satisfy WP:GNG. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 13:40, 2 December 2021 (UTC) Keep The subject...
Click to read more »RiggedMint has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG; could not find any sources other than the homepage referenced. RiggedMint...
Click to read more »Refrigerator has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. No significant and independent coverage. I can't find a lot of sources online...
Click to read more »CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:07, 3 November 2025 (UTC) '''Keep.''' The subject meets WP:GNG. There are multiple independent editorial sources (not primary, not paid...
Click to read more »request BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG. No lasting notability, and Wikipedia is not a newspaper. BRP ever 09:35...
Click to read more »as creator has contested QD. Not notable, no significant coverage, fails GNG. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 01:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »explanation well that subject is being notable. Also failed clauses of WP:GNG. --DMK-C5 (talk) 04:04, 9 September 2022 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Definitely fails WP:GNG and probably some disruptive sockpuppetry as all the names in the article...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: The sources are not good enough for WP:GNG or WP:Notability (people). 172.58.21.180 (talk) 04:11, 4 August 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »the en.wiki page would have shown there was enough references to meet WP:GNG. Please remember to perform WP:BEFORE when thinking about nominating an article...
Click to read more »the reason: Does not meet WP:GNG, when I looked on Google, not much results are returned that would meet the criterion at GNG Tsugaru let's talk! :) 02:53...
Click to read more »nothing beyond they have a social media presence. That's not enough to show WP:GNG is met. Probably a very nice person, but not one we should have an article...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 20:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »detail. Additionally, I checked the source, and it doesn’t satisfies WP:GNG Shakib ul hassan talk! 22:01, 31 December 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »Mastashat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Clearly fails WP: GNG. I don't think this page is considered notable. Looking at the sources listed...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: This particular website/tool failes WP:GNG, and the article in its current state borders on an advertisement. Perhaps...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Also see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearl Kapur. --Ferien (talk |...
Click to read more »reason: QD was declined, so I'm taking this here. Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG, in Persian or English. Not a notable educational institution. — *Fehufangą...
Click to read more »request Yahya has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and Wikipedia:Notability (people). Yahya (talk) 16:21, 9 August 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail GNG and notability is not inherited. --Ferien (talk) 17:00, 26 March 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »sufficient to establish notability. Looking online not seeing much either to pass GNG. --IWI (talk) 14:19, 27 August 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 15:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »- It meets the guideline outlined by Slowking4 above, but actually fails GNG due to lack of coverage - so delete. IWI (chat) 15:36, 19 July 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »reason: Not a notable businessman. Barely any coverage shown to meet WP:GNG. BRP ever 06:36, 1 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable entrepreneur. Fails GNG. BRP ever 12:16, 30 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable software. Fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 11:05, 1 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »No notable as there seems to be no significant coverage on her. Fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 07:55, 2 November 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails per GNG and that one athlete guideline. This person has already had tens of articles...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 17:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable photgrapher. The page fails GNG. BRP ever 11:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »