Redirect to:
To assume good faith is an important part of Wikipedia. It means to think that people on Wikipedia have good intentions when they do something (like changing...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:UWWP:UW User warnings are meant to guide good-faith testers and dissuade bad-faith vandals. You may place any of the warning templates listed...
Click to read more »and try to reach a compromise. Assume good faith, unless it is obvious they are not editing in good faith. If using the talk page has not helped, ask...
Click to read more »in good faith. Level 3 (Warning) – Assumes bad faith; warns editor to stop what they are doing. Level 4 (Final Warning) – Assumes bad faith; a strong...
Click to read more »for deletion was to Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 08:40, 20 April 2024 (UTC) Faith Stowers (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close...
Click to read more »help. This can cause harm to our ideas of assuming good faith. Some editors focus on "good faith" so much, that they might think that is all you need to...
Click to read more »rules for how to work better in Wikipedia together. Wikipedia:Assume good faith Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers Wikipedia:User page Wikipedia:Protecting...
Click to read more »assumption of Good faith by editors who have contributed to the talk page. If there are recent heated discussions on the talk page, good faith may be lacking...
Click to read more »about their RfA is often a better choice than suddenly closing their good faith attempt at adminship. Any candidate who sees that their RfA is failing may...
Click to read more »here. —Clementina talk 10:44, 13 November 2010 (UTC) Wikipedia:Assume bad faith (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) Kansan (talk) has...
Click to read more »assume good faith. People who wrote the article and think they own it should be talked to on the article talk page. Always assume good faith - do not think...
Click to read more »is the blocked/banned user, and no other user has made significant good-faith edits to the page. This does not mean that an administrator must delete...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Bad faith nomination. -DJSasso (talk) 15:06, 12 September 2011 (UTC) Internet Explorer...
Click to read more »{strikethrough|This article has been undoubtedly notoriously created in Bad Faith to give a bad impression overall towards the country.} Inamos (talk) 18:59...
Click to read more »argue about it, without listening to other users. Wikipedia works with good faith edits and consensus. When people refuse to listen, even after other people...
Click to read more »administrator has removed. Users who appear to be children changing pages in good faith who give out identifying personal information should be treated kindly and...
Click to read more »will help Wikipedia become a much happier place! Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to: Love Wikipedia:Be kind Wikipedia:Assume good faith...
Click to read more »{strikethrough|This article has been undoubtedly notoriously created in Bad Faith to give a bad impression overall towards the country.} Inamos (talk) 19:03...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedily kept as bad faith deletion nomination with no valid reason cited. Pmlineditor (t · c · l)...
Click to read more »the advice of other editors. If editors on a talk page suggest in good faith that you may have a conflict of interest, try to identify and minimize your...
Click to read more »nationalistic editing. Because Wikipedia editors are expected to assume good faith, labeling another editor as a distortionist is a personal attack and should...
Click to read more »progress but only if the user has been disruptive. Requests made in bad faith may result in you being blocked. Blocks are different than bans. They can...
Click to read more »not likely to cause a dispute. Rollback must not be used to remove good-faith changes by other users, registered or not. If the tool is repeatedly used...
Click to read more »that others are working to make the encyclopedia better (assuming good faith). Building a consensus also means that everyone must try to be neutral to...
Click to read more »policies of Assume good faith and No personal attacks. Judging on behaviour elsewhere can be seen as one user is not assuming good faith in the new user, as...
Click to read more »such as Twinkle, Huggle, and rollback should not be used to undo good-faith changes or in content disputes unless an appropriate edit summary is used...
Click to read more »To note you, I will only be using this tools for bad faith assumptlion. If I'm assuming good faith there, I'll just undo it or use Twinkle to revert the...
Click to read more »advantage at the expense of other users or the Wikipedia community. Bad-faith wikilawyering – arguing the word of policy to defeat the principles of policy...
Click to read more »maybe quick delete per G3. This redirect was definitely not created in good-faith and if you look at the IPs contributions they add about the "Chinese virus"...
Click to read more »those comments without names in the meantime. {{Uw-tilde}} Assume good faith on the part of the newcomer. They most likely want to help out. Give them...
Click to read more »unblock request to ask that another user should also be blocked. Assume good faith. It is possible that the other users who may have reported you, and the...
Click to read more »closed quicker due to this. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. – Bad faith nomination. – RyanCross (talk) 01:37, 10 October 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »category for duplicates, but it's obviously not a test page, I assume good faith in the writer, but it's not needed. Please delete. DaneGeld (talk) 17:01...
Click to read more »some elements for the table, Some user did add a QD label. Ignoring good faith to his talk page I swore, As he laughed at my new, fantasy, ore. While I...
Click to read more »user who created it has since been indef'ed and more then likely a bad faith create. With 2 speedy noms, I must concur that this should be closed early...
Click to read more »its still a bad change, so I used a lv. 1 warning (Neutral Faith) instead of lv. 2 (bad faith). rollingbarrels (talk) 09:39, 10 January 2020 (UTC) IMHO...
Click to read more »to the terms that I can not use the tool in edit wars or to revert good faith edits. The tool would also help me deal with vandalism-only users or IPs...
Click to read more »see is an editor who is willing to get into these disputes acting in good faith for the encyclopedia. Lastly, I also wish to point out my desire for active...
Click to read more »wiki. I strongly agree to the terms that I cannot use it to revert good faith edits or make edit wars. I think I should be capable for this permission...
Click to read more »Rollback must never be used to revert in edit wars, or to remove good-faith changes. Use the undo feature for this, and give a reason. Rollback does...
Click to read more »unencyclopedic entry by what appears to be a disruptive user. Assume good faith. Do not attack the author who you suspect is disruptive. However, revert...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Assuming good faith here...--Eptalon (talk) 11:30, 27 October 2018 (UTC) Jimmy Hibbert (edit...
Click to read more »only for bad faith changes that you're sure are made by someone who has no intention of helping Wikipedia, so it's best to assume good faith when there's...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Closing bad-faith deletion request that has no reason given --Auntof6 (talk) 05:22, 29 June...
Click to read more »Just remember that rollback is only for vandalism, not for undoing good faith edits or anything else. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC) Yeah...
Click to read more »improve this project and that I have no doubt would continue to assume good faith and use his powers to improve the project. Kansan (talk) 03:35, 19 February...
Click to read more »(UTC) Block a good faith user is much worse than unbanning a bad faith user. The bad faith user can just be reblocked, the good faith user has a taint on...
Click to read more »purpose makes you an editor that everyone hates. Keep assuming in good faith and report it to any active adminstrator or open a topic about it in the...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:44, 19 September 2011 (UTC) You won't get blocked if its good faith. If you QD an article and it should go through RfD then the admin or another...
Click to read more »though archiving is preferred. Please note, though, that the removal of good-faith warnings, even though permitted, is often frowned upon. If the community...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: I moved this page to Confession of faith because it was about the incorrect topic. In Catholicism, "confession" usually...
Click to read more »including refraining from using the tool in edit wars or to revert good faith edits. This tool would also make it easier for me to deal with vandalism-only...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Bad faith nomination -DJSasso (talk) 15:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC) QBasic (edit ·...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Bad faith nomination. -DJSasso (talk) 15:09, 12 September 2011 (UTC) Surrain (edit...
Click to read more »merging. WP:SNOW keep - article is a featured article. Hard to assume good faith with a nomination like this. IWI (chat) 22:10, 17 August 2020 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request...
Click to read more »to as "this guy". –Juliancolton | Talk 02:04, 1 October 2009 (UTC) Bad-faith de-adminship requests should be summarily closed. This is axe grinding,...
Click to read more »(UTC) Weak support - No reason not to but still not into it, assuming good faith.-- † CR90 01:53, 15 February 2010 (UTC) +1 --vector ^_^ (talk) 08:30,...
Click to read more »(UTC) Its not a waste of time, the nomination I believe was made in good faith and the article has been improved since. Therefore you could actually say...
Click to read more »term "LTA" implies bad faith, but I am pretty sure that GYH is acting in good faith. I don't see how a person acting in good faith can be labelled as "LTA"...
Click to read more »18:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC) And I have to say this lovely bit of assuming bad faith sums up my feelings beautifully. Also goes a long way towards prooving my...
Click to read more »rollbacks(xtools:autoedits/ko.wikipedia.org/기나ㅏㄴ/all). I won't revert good faith change or edit war using rollback. Thank you. --ginaan(T/C) 07:42, 25 September...
Click to read more »in a serious conflict with anybody yet. I always try hard to assume good faith and be polite to people for Jesus' sake, that I may not tarnish the pure...
Click to read more »asking a rhetorical question. Both of which make sense. Please assume good faith here, and don't scare off editors.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 20:11, 30 January...
Click to read more »for fun. I do not trust him, as I doubt a few edits have not been in good faith, and it doesn't matter if he has been in Simple wiki long enough or not...
Click to read more »of disputes, particularly recently to the point where (albeit in a bad faith manner) your adminship was requested to be removed. I'm not sure now is...
Click to read more »appears you sometimes cannot tell the difference between vandalism and good-faith edits. There is also a discussion on the administrators' noticeboard currently...
Click to read more »for the reason: Pahe was created for vandalism, even when presuming good faith. --Osmo Lundell (talk) 08:46, 18 March 2025 (UTC) Osmo Lundell (talk) 08:46...
Click to read more »tool. Used rollback here to remove a section of comments I made in good faith. While removal of comments on your own page is kosher, using rollback to...
Click to read more »abide by the discussion about these on simple talk shows a lack of good faith in this community. --Gotanda (talk) 22:15, 20 February 2022 (UTC) Gotanda...
Click to read more »assuming someone won't abuse or do something in bad faith. I am not suggesting he will do something in bad faith. I am saying he doesn't have enough experience...
Click to read more »read Wikipedia:Rollback feature and plan to continue using undo for good-faith edits (substituting the default summary for an explanation). In addition...
Click to read more »notability criteria, almost to the point where it doesn't seem like good faith. Please ensure you follow WP:BEFORE when nominating an article. -DJSasso...
Click to read more »inappropriate usernames. It should not be used where they are doing it in good-faith, or if you just disagree with them Techman224Talk 03:01, 15 March 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia to work on and discuss. Act in good faith, do not make problems to prove something, and assume good faith on the part of others. Be open and welcoming...
Click to read more »article may be a hoax. --IWI (talk) 05:31, 23 August 2020 (UTC) Hoax by bad faith editor Naleksuh (talk) 20:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »Many articles are created on Wikipedia every day, most of which are a good faith effort by contributors to improve the encyclopedia. Preferably the first...
Click to read more »May 2022 (UTC) Delete probably paid-for spam. Anyway, this isn't a good faith attempt at contributing: w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Remitbuber...
Click to read more »08:12, 25 October 2019 (UTC) Delete. I think page creation may be in good faith. But yikes, even if notable it would need quite a bit of cleanup. Desertborn...
Click to read more »November 2009 (UTC) No, I have assumed good faith. I have specifically said he would not act in bad faith. I can oppose the current setup of our crat...
Click to read more »reliable sources Notability Patent nonsense Behavioural guidelines Assume good faith Conflict of interest Do not make problems to prove something Etiquette Gaming...
Click to read more »abuse is not reason for deletion. The majority of use seems to be in good faith and with good reason. We need not delete a template because of a minority...
Click to read more »deity Mother goddess Beliefs, 11 Animism Creation myth Curse Eschatology Faith Myth of origins Resurrection Sacred Supernatural Totemism Theophany Practices...
Click to read more »bad faith is not a valid argument. - A Link to the Past (talk) 02:02, 5 August 2008 (UTC) Please explain how there is an assumption of bad faith Link...
Click to read more »maybe quick delete per G3. This redirect was definitely not created in good-faith and if you look at the IPs contributions they add about the "Chinese virus"...
Click to read more »is not Good Faith, even when the "crystal balling" is done over at English-wiki. Whether the article gets kept or not, I have Good Faith that the administrator...
Click to read more »nominate Sam for adminship. He has great edits and is always assuming good faith. While I was banned he sent me emails as suggestions to get me unblocked...
Click to read more »passing mention in a table and a paragraph. The claim one of the first faith-based Muslim singers to sing in English is nowhere in the book. -- *Fehufangą...
Click to read more »meet our quick deletion criteria. I was following policy. I hope you have faith that I would follow the oversight policy as well. It is very, very clear...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) --vector ^_^ (talk) 19:53, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Support I have faith he meets the only important criteria, namely sticking to the privacy code...
Click to read more »That's an interesting question, Griffin. :) I am firmly convinced that my faith in Christianity will not hinder anything I do on Wikipedia. I haven't had...
Click to read more »is a hard working article builder and copyeditor. He also acts in good faith, and has never been uncivil in his time here. He has a strong knowledge...
Click to read more »(talk) 00:34, 14 November 2021 (UTC) Everyone should please try to show Good Faith, when trying to analyze as a complete context: "The usual South-Asian young...
Click to read more »be it RfA, RfD or GAs. They just aren't allowed to vote. IPs, as good faith as they may be, could be anyone - sockpuppets for all we know. We treat...
Click to read more »this are so great that everything else is tainted. Delete and allow a good-faith editor to recreate in the future and perhaps we can better judge notability...
Click to read more »the article's relevance. I declare my understanding of Wikipedia's good faith rules. BenjaminGM (talk) 23:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC) Delete seem promotional...
Click to read more »30 October 2024 (UTC) Keep It doesn't seem that bad. I'm assuming good faith that the content is accurate. PRicoNMI (talk) 19:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »collaborative environment. Act in good faith, do not make problems to prove something, and assume good faith on the part of others. -WP:5 There are many...
Click to read more »at that and reject this proposal. To me (and I'm not assuming the best faith, admittedly, but there's evidence and justification for doing so) it seems...
Click to read more »closing the discussion, kindly don't delete, I assure and assume in good faith, I will fix and address and adhere to the concern raised about the topic...
Click to read more »such accounts cannot be ursuped). I will also not object if this is a bad faith account blocked impersonating an established user. Camouflaged Mirage (talk)...
Click to read more »to the nominator to do a good faith search for sources prior to nominating. So if you know its notable then its bad faith (or more likely misguided) to...
Click to read more »as shown a good sense of judgement in when to warn, when to assume good faith and when to escalate incidents. Recent concentrations include mainspace...
Click to read more »use something more Simple. IMHO, a "good faith" and a "bad faith" template would be enough, with the good faith one assuming lack of clue (and giving links...
Click to read more »votes have been for delete. There is no need for such assumptions of bad faith. I was on the fence on this one but think that SuperBid as a company might...
Click to read more »specifically exists to help good faith editors step around bureaucratic red tape that may have been created in good faith but are preventing beneficial actions...
Click to read more »WP:Rollback feature and I am aware that rollback should not ever be used for good-faith edits - Twinkle or normal undo can be used for those. Thank you for your...
Click to read more »the unblock request at their talk page and while I'd like to assume good faith, I'd like to, at the very least, see an indication by them that they realise...
Click to read more »Transclusions {{User:Quantum4/Templates/AGF Userbox}} This user always assumes good faith. Transclusions {{User:Lauryn Ashby/AdminRB}} 127.0.0.0/8 This administrator...
Click to read more »bad faith not to link or ping a user when you are making a complaint about them. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC) Is it more bad faith than...
Click to read more »different practices can be mistaken for vandalism (or at least unwanted good faith edits) when they really aren't. It takes a bit of time to learn some of...
Click to read more »We have to be nice, assume good faith, and not be a dick. (Not that I was accusing you of being mean, assuming bad faith, and being a dick). Also, how do...
Click to read more »massive enormous huge ginormous oppose User shows an extreme level of bad faith towards me. TurboGolf 07:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC) This is a big accusation...
Click to read more »confront my work. Deppiyy (talk) 18:59, 9 February 2022 (UTC) Assume good faith - while the redirect-discussion churns out a "verdict".--Not sure that I...
Click to read more »oppose rationales, fix the issues, then come back after some time. I've got faith. NonvocalScream (talk) 18:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC) Tharton, what was this...
Click to read more »reviewing another editor. Editors are asked to remain civil and assume good faith. When reviewing, consider: User conduct: Using the edit summaries correctly...
Click to read more »investigations/Nithiin1983, which means this article immediately strikes me as a bad faith creation. In any case, the subject is not notable and subscribers cannot...
Click to read more »first and second level warnings assume that the person is acting in good faith, doesn't really intend vandalism and perhaps is just bored and trying out...
Click to read more »carefully and the article itself before even considering to revert. Assume good faith is something that pops in mind when thinking about this. Thanks again Cassandra...
Click to read more »show it in the article. As per WP:BEFORE we are obligated to make a good faith effort to look for sources for something before nominating it. Was that...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC) Interesting... talk about not assuming good faith. If you guys (or gals?) want, please remove this section as the only reason...
Click to read more »assuming good faith is an important principle on Wikipedia. --IWI (talk) 14:31, 5 April 2021 (UTC) "Actions that are not consistent with good faith include...
Click to read more »new users not doing very well, which if you see, you should assume good faith with. WikiGnomes, editors which do work behind the scenes. WikiFallens,...
Click to read more »not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request...
Click to read more »articles for deletion as long as the nom is in good faith. I see no evidence that this nom was in bad faith. -DJSasso (talk) 16:17, 25 July 2010 (UTC) Blocked...
Click to read more »the vandal. What are your actions and why? A: First of all, I assume good faith. I would not block the admin or do something that would just cause drama...
Click to read more »sentence, Apologies for the bad faith on my part, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC) Not bad faith, just a misunderstanding. :) -- Auntof6...
Click to read more »April 2009 (UTC) Careful Cman. The editor requested a deletion in good faith, please don't even go close to calling him stupid, as it could be interpretated...
Click to read more »editor made a pointless section is bad faith assumptions. He stated "Completely pointless section.". That is bad faith assumptions... and is only a small...
Click to read more »good objections. There is 1 oppose vote, which may have been made in good faith, but was made by a user who is now indef blocked. There are also 6 comments...
Click to read more »follow WP:BEFORE when nominating for deletion. ie you have to make a good faith search for references which would be found as soon as you went to the en...
Click to read more »"assume good faith", but I think in most cases of unhelpful editing, one warning plus an openness to dialogue would be enough. A good faith editor would...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep. This template was created in good faith to tag content that exists but serves no encyclopedic purpose. The nominator...
Click to read more »warrant its presence here on Wikipedia. I declare my understanding, in good faith, of Wikipedia's rules. BenjaminGM (talk) 20:46, 3 January 2024 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »The main problem here is that he (or she. probably he) is acting in good faith. We do not have many options; he is not really distrupting (so blocking...
Click to read more »crossover from this), illustrate that the content was not created in good faith; most of it sounds like a joke, bar the (not terribly relevant) observation...
Click to read more »Rollbackers need to have good judgement over edits and should assume good faith. We don't need all those user groups. We are a small community, let's keep...
Click to read more »them then that is your option. Actioned for what? I generally assume good faith. Best, NonvocalScream (talk) 16:34, 23 July 2009 (UTC) Per all my other...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Super Mega Gigantic Massive Huge Enormous Oppose User shows bad faith towards me (ie he oppose me in my RfAs and deletes pages that I created...
Click to read more »code/label ~2000 revisions labeling them productive/damaging and good faith/bad faith. This would be similar to the campaign on English Wikipedia en:Wikipedia:Labels/Edit...
Click to read more »personal discussion about intentions and questioning motives. Assume good faith, please. We have a proposal below to redirect one sentence place articles...
Click to read more »worried about scaring people away because the stub was clearly done in good faith, then drop them a line and advise them it needs to be longer, otherwise...
Click to read more »paid editing is not entirely problematic; the motive seems to be in good faith. IWI (chat) 23:17, 21 January 2019 (UTC) Thanks for the feedback, additional...
Click to read more »improve the article. Any COI? You should atleast give some time to good faith editors. Pretty nonsense. Temporarycowmew (talk) 23:53, 19 February 2026...
Click to read more »yet, and he has continued. I am certain that this user is editing good faith, but this is not enough; competence is required also. This kind of disruption...
Click to read more »11:45, 18 June 2010 (UTC) I recently came across this. While it is a good faith attempt at enforcing wikibreaks, we shouldn't be entertaining those types...
Click to read more »29 December 2009 (UTC) Of course not, because the edit was made in good faith, even though the user is community banned. It goes to show that they are...
Click to read more »look at my contributions, you will see that they have all been in good faith. Keep an eye on me by all means, but if I was really a vandal who was trying...
Click to read more »and good will. It is about a trend from editors. Failures to assume good faith, and outright personal attacks threaten the colloborative atmosphere. So...
Click to read more »reliable sources Notability Patent nonsense Behavioural guidelines Assume good faith Conflict of interest Do not make problems to prove something Etiquette Gaming...
Click to read more »supported by black hat SEO sources. Non-notable. This is clearly a bad faith article - one of the fake sources is deceptively labelled as "NBC News"...
Click to read more »trust that your choice in them was right. If you make someone a CU, have faith that they will do what is best, tell you what they can, and remain totally...
Click to read more »seeing enough. The blatant attempt at advertising really discourages good-faith editors from trying to improve anything (hint, hint to IP's...). Ravensfire...
Click to read more »critics - a twenty-something: "Why are you not sixty years old".--My good faith take, on the wiki-article: The article has not been made, as an "answer"...
Click to read more »English by copying and pasting text. While I commend Eptalon on assuming good faith, I think the edits are not harmless. Much of the stuff on enwp in this area...
Click to read more »am not sure that it helps to use it when some people are acting in good faith. The simple message could be "Someone does not agree with the change you...
Click to read more »done before but I want to get that feature because I can't rollback bad faiths in mobile version. I usually observe all activities in Wikipedia New changes...
Click to read more »(UTC) (change conflict) While I believe Racepacket to be acting in good faith, many of his edits seem a tad clueless. I am also worried about his behavior...
Click to read more »reason to keep this. Ternera (talk) 15:30, 15 July 2024 (UTC) Keep The good faith edit remains as such. we don't always delete blocked IPs contributions....
Click to read more »of copyright. Also, it is deeply dependent on a prior knowledge of that faith, and not really appropriate for our general readership. Apart from the first...
Click to read more »of the original period. My natural inclination is toward assuming good faith; however, as a newer user, it is possible that I may be missing signs of...
Click to read more »September 2009 (UTC) This editor is making changes, presumably, in good faith. I am using the term "vandal" here very loosely. Many of you know we've...
Click to read more »Dish's vote is trolling and needlessly offensive. I struggle to assume good faith of accounts that spend most of their time on this project voting on things...
Click to read more »the same time, the pathways to editing should remain open for all good-faith participants. Read more on Apple iCloud Private Relay. Answer the questions...
Click to read more »This is the pattern with the user. Generally good faith edits on one account, and not so good faith edits on another (we call it good hand, bad hand)...
Click to read more »image. Deleting this article and articles like it that were created in good faith simply reinforces Wikipedia's well-know problems with gender discrimination...
Click to read more »separately. --IWI (talk) 08:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC) I totally accept your good faith. I obliquely suggested that we will never have to write a page in this subject...
Click to read more »not that the only substantial editor blanked. See: "If requested in good faith and provided that the only substantial content of the page was added by...
Click to read more »editing. SHB2000 (talk) 01:37, 27 September 2021 (UTC) Delete not a good faith attempt at writing an encyclopedia article. MER-C (talk) 11:19, 3 October...
Click to read more »but good-faith admins who aren't familiar with technical stuff usually don't use it at all, and because of its slow nature, any kind of bad-faith abuse can...
Click to read more »the country. This article has been undoubtedly notoriously created in Bad Faith to give a bad impression overall towards the country. As for the opinion...
Click to read more »history). I'm not sure wether it is vandalism, spam, a test edit(s), or a good-faith edit. He has been editing the page since Feb. 2. So I thought the admins...
Click to read more »recognition Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers Wikipedia:Assume good faith Wikipedia:Assume no clue Wikipedia:No personal attacks Wikipedia:Don't call...
Click to read more »going back through the previous versions. If any of the versions were good faith, they should not be rolled back and so each would have to be checked. At...
Click to read more »seems). His original blocks were under the name Matrix17 and included bad faith afd noms, incivility, harassment, non-notable bios recreation, and impersonating...
Click to read more »voluntarily is getting more and more annoying. All users here act in good faith and no one respect this. The two closed requests had a very clear consensus...
Click to read more »more here. We can't afford to lose any editors, even the occasional good-faith IP. Juliancolton (talk) 19:52, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Not at all, Razor....
Click to read more »28 February 2010 (UTC) I withdraw my opposition, user seems to be a good faith editor --Eptalon (talk) 23:08, 2 March 2010 (UTC) First things first: It...
Click to read more »review an edit could be the difference between accidentally reverting a good faith edit or not. Quickly looking through your contributions, I don't see any...
Click to read more »enhance it. I declare that I am familiar with Wikipedia's rules in good faith. BenjaminGM (talk) 11:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC) Keep i find more sources...
Click to read more »block/ban. G5 should not be used to delete pages which has had major good-faith contributions from other users. G5 is an option. There is no obligation...
Click to read more »more general political point of view; or those who adhere to a certain faith. The problem with such categories is that the basis they rely on is fairly...
Click to read more »that Wikipedia is based upon: "anyone can make changes" and "assume good faith". I'm disappointed to see these pages protected and would like them un-protected...
Click to read more »15 November 2009 (UTC) The interlanguage links on Wikipedia:Assume good faith are not working correctly. The syntax appears to be correct, but they are...
Click to read more »VandalFighterFR(V) Bad warning? 14:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC) That was nearly good faith, it's not like I yelled at him, all I did was put a little emphasis on the...
Click to read more »two year gap in editing that Allixpeeke had. I didn't want to assume bad faith and go, "Oh, that's vandalism," so I thought I'd ask here. That's all. --Lithorien...
Click to read more »mention and made over 60 VIP reports, treating vandals fairly, with good faith until no other course of action bar VIP remains. He always seems to be one...
Click to read more »don't know if it's one LTA doing it, or a group of people acting in good faith or whatever, it's getting to become a bigger problem. Several list articles...
Click to read more »of what is seen by some editors as vandalism is actually bumbling good-faith editing. And some of what some editors call vandalism is in fact correct...
Click to read more »12:23, 19 September 2011 (UTC) I am genuine. Thank you for assuming good faith.--213.107.74.132 (talk) 12:25, 19 September 2011 (UTC) (e/c)I'm only pulling...
Click to read more »would you change a local redirect to a soft-redirect to en? Or remove good faith edits without saying why? Other reverts you have made appear to be done...
Click to read more »policy on unrelated issues seems too harsh to me. He is editing in good faith and trying his best. At worst, I would suggest a short-term community ban...
Click to read more »This wouldn't be bureaucracy for the sake of bureaucracy; it's a good faith effort to address a problem. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »as well as the assumption of good faith. Nothing else that this candidate has done even remotely infers bad faith intentions - he clearly is here to...
Click to read more »them nervous or unhappy. But overall you're a very good editor, and good-faithed too. I hope you can continue your work well and improve soon! Happy editing...
Click to read more »Desertborn (talk) 08:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC) I would really like to assume good faith but this page makes me hard for me to do so. Would appreciate if someone...
Click to read more »they participate in all aspects of this project so I would assume good faith and say that they are not here in a disruptive fashion. Griff (talk) 11:53...
Click to read more »desirability. Either way, since you are entitled to use your time in any good-faith way you see fit (since all of us are volunteers), an article on TV Tokyo...
Click to read more »controversies-in-making but Icek863 is making it hard for me to assume good faith in helping him. Could someone watch over him? Kaltxì Na'vi! 22:19, 6 January...
Click to read more »state. Osiris (talk) 12:24, 1 March 2014 (UTC) Obviously Angela is a good-faith editor. The content creation just needs some practice. Proof-reading and...
Click to read more »Gotanda (talk) 05:05, 21 October 2011 (UTC) As long as he is making a good faith attempt to simplify we do allow copying and pasting of articles. That is...
Click to read more »America/or Europe, and from Saudi Arabia. There is a great tolerance for other faiths in the KSA. If, as a Christian, I can presume, I would quote from the Qu'ran:...
Click to read more »The criterion they use on en, I believe, is whether the tag is in good faith or not. alexandra (talk) 17:42, 25 October 2008 (UTC) Hello, i put a complex...
Click to read more »be performed. Target username has edits. If the target username has good faith edits which were not immediately reverted, and the account owner has not...
Click to read more »article he makes is pretty much non notable but since he's editing in good faith I don't think there is much we can do about it. I'm in favour of deletion...
Click to read more »edit war is against a blatant vandal and not disruptive editing or good faith editing) and I have read the tool's respective guidelines, essays and rules...
Click to read more »considered as well. Primary considerations (for me) are quality of edits, good faith, sustained interest in the project, and understanding of what being an administrator...
Click to read more »with bad faith, more than half of your "facts" are nonsense, you have proven nothing at all apart from your unhealthy obsession and your bad faith in this...
Click to read more »articles are crippled by this rule, as almost every image invloving the Baha'i Faith is owned by the Baha'i World Center. They are available for free use as...
Click to read more »the right place (they're not there because we distrust authors -- good faith is assumed). In general, the main content of the page may well be suitable...
Click to read more »just contribute a bit more. Also, I think you should assume more better faith (even though you were quite wonderful to me, giving me that great, megawatt...
Click to read more »where personal success at work may be linked to belonging to a certain faith. (Iran comes to mind...) --Eptalon (talk) 15:42, 11 August 2010 (UTC) Mosque...
Click to read more »October 2008 (UTC) Wow Creol, I had no idea that RfD I closed as a bad faith nomination was actually Ric, and the vandalism he did with his other accounts...
Click to read more »difficult so that no one understands about ourselves and should be in good faith and meet Wikipedia's enclosens. Kashish pall (talk) 16:19, 12 November 2020...
Click to read more »merging. Strong Keep as the nominator of this article for deletion is a bad faith editor have edit warred with me, this article have significant coverage...
Click to read more »page is better than leaving it lying around. All articles made in good faith are welcome, but try hard to keep the articles you make from being stubs...
Click to read more »June 2010 (UTC) My point here is how do you know it's spam and not a good faith attempt to add a website related to the topic and perhaps valid? If doubt...
Click to read more »that is currently causing more harm than good, yet still acting in good faith? It can reduce edit conflicts on such noticeboards, and throwaway comments...
Click to read more »DaneGeld (talk) 14:24, 4 May 2018 (UTC) Clearly, I like to assume good faiths too but DJ Mixify, Fatemeh Parisa, Parisa Mixify see the number of failed...
Click to read more »00:45, 28 September 2010 (UTC) Rollback must not be used to remove good-faith changes by other users. If the tool is used wrongly, it will be quickly...
Click to read more »copyright, vandalism etc. I'd not like to use a template against a good faith editor just trying to help. A quiet customised chat on their talkpage would...
Click to read more »calling or insults. Please review Wikipedia:Be kind if you need to. In good faith, EhJJTALK 00:34, 3 October 2009 (UTC) Note:This is not directed at any one...
Click to read more »you know you are going to be away you should give the tool back in good faith.--Gordonrox24 (talk) 05:10, 19 June 2009 (UTC) I've created a new template...
Click to read more »claimed many dupes and showed two. And, what ever happened to assume good faith? You say, "looks like a classic "if I dump 50 urls of articles I made"....
Click to read more »keep the Chinese government from looking bad. And I say that assuming good faith, but it does very much look like that. It is just a list, of movies that...
Click to read more »he should have got consensus first. I revert, he reverts back. In good faith, I have not reverted again. There is no evidence of long term IP or User...
Click to read more »edits and suggestions you make there will truly be constructive or in good faith, which means that they likely will not be accepted by the community. I am...
Click to read more »Ask questions, get answers. Be polite, and welcoming to new users Assume good faith Do not attack other users For disputes, please see our guideline...
Click to read more »culture of bullying. DJSasso used the word "disruptive" and the phrase "bad faith" here. These are loaded words. With bitter regret, I have learned the hard...
Click to read more »request feels like a request to hat collect. (not that it wasn't done in good faith). We are such a small community that we should have less flags not more...
Click to read more »September 2018 (UTC) I only use 1 if it could in some way be seen as good faith which is rare. I almost never use 1. But then I also think too many here...
Click to read more »black-and-white as the rules of my household think. But, it is in good faith and I will miss you all. Goodbye (temporarily), Ionas Rand [i.'ɔ.na.sız...
Click to read more »uncilised language at my [page]. I [again] to review the article in good faith. but met with [abuse] I again reiterate that Wikipedia is a shared space...
Click to read more »even if you're not vandalizing, you are acting in extremely bad faith by calling good-faith edits "trolling" and "disruptive", regardless of their content...
Click to read more »anyways) would still create pages, and it would likely only stop the good faith IP editors who have better things to do from editing. We could implement...
Click to read more »of which guidance brought about no improvements - I'm about out of good faith for what seems to be promotional content for non-notable solo projects,...
Click to read more »May 2020 (UTC) IWI, Similar username too but I am going to assume good faith... They will be blocked soon anyways if they keep doing this --Thegooduser...
Click to read more »Category:Municipalities in the Philippines (see above). I have been making a good faith effort to understand your concerns, but frankly I am about finished trying...
Click to read more »LTA with some spam history. I've deleted both as G3, they're clearly bad-faith articles that harm the project. Vermont 🐿️ (talk) 18:08, 13 June 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »this not being notable and admin are chosen in part for the communities faith in them generally making the community accepted correct call, this could...
Click to read more »6 August 2012 (UTC) Continue Ban - Unfortunately I tried to have some faith but the user seems unwilling to change from the manner of editing for which...
Click to read more »However, we also recognize that not every takedown notice is valid or in good faith. In such cases, we strongly encourage users to file counter-notifications...
Click to read more »Something else to remember is WP:BEFORE. You are supposed to make a good faith look for sources before you put something up for deletion, this applies...
Click to read more »similar-looking articles in Chinese and Japanese, but I am assuming good faith at the moment. --IWI (talk) 16:38, 28 August 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »--Ferien (talk) 11:51, 15 December 2022 (UTC) Delete for suspected bad faith editing. See what appears in Wikidata for the director and this film, related...
Click to read more »one of notability, which is covered by the print reference (assuming good faith, as I haven't got access to it). Goblin 02:46, 26 August 2014 (UTC) I ♥...
Click to read more »122.178 (talk) 08:55, 26 October 2021 (UTC) Draftify (after removing good-faith mistake - external link to wiki-article about a different persion.). — Preceding...
Click to read more »06:43, 24 January 2010 (UTC) Keep It's short, but it's been made in good faith I think, and I agree with Nifky that though it does need expanding, it doesn't...
Click to read more »support - I'm not entirely convinced, but I'm willing to assume a bit of good faith here, and support, afterall, its not a big deal... Kennedy 10:56, 12 March...
Click to read more »there is no reason not to believe that this discussion was made in good faith. Please do not make such comments as your rationale. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 05:49...
Click to read more »PeterSymonds (talk) 11:55, 7 March 2010 (UTC) And the fact that you can't assume good faith because you know my religious and political beliefs is disturbing to me...
Click to read more »=talk to the commander= 17:14, 8 January 2009 (UTC) Support - Out of good faith:) --§ Snake311 (I'm Not Okay!) 20:08, 8 January 2009 (UTC) Support - Give...
Click to read more »use policy Spam • Vandalism • Deletion policy The Community Assume good faith • Be kind Community Portal • Simple talk • TASERING Announcements • IRC...
Click to read more »well. Most of which have been good faith edits by MathXplore. The only edits I revert back are edits that are bad faith edits removing important information...
Click to read more »pretty sad, but then again, this is Wikipedia where accusations of bad faith are thrown around like they're going out of fashion. It was nothing like...
Click to read more »just redirect as it does seem a likely error to be made. Ill assume good faith and go with an honest mixup rather than an intentional hoax. As to the en:...
Click to read more »sockpuppet allegation: I am the real-life subject and I am posting here in good faith from my own account. Any concerns about sockpuppetry should be handled through...
Click to read more »did not create an account here, so it could be an impersonator or a good-faith account who dosen't know who I am. Can anybody help me on handling this...
Click to read more »raised that you didn't know how to properly distinguish between good and bad faith edits, so we're going to want to see your need for it demonstrated. Osiris...
Click to read more »references that comprehensively cover the topic. I declare my awareness, in good faith, of Wikipedia's rules. BenjaminGM (talk) 00:07, 4 January 2024 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »dealing with and avoiding WikiHate: Wikipedia:Civility Wikipedia:Assume good faith Wikipedia:No personal attacks Wikipedia:Wikiquette Wikipedia:Staying cool...
Click to read more »actions that got him blocked before and for other edits that were in bad faith. As before, I told him I would copy any comments he had here while he is...
Click to read more »themselves, and doing so exempts you from the strictures of civility and good faith. Come to think of it, why waste time constructing a sarcastic response where...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. That is what "open-source" means. Whatever happened to assume good faith, etc.? If editors want to make an article and it isn't vandalism or propaganda...
Click to read more »diffs are in chronological order): AGF issues Not assuming good faith Not assuming good faith, accusing an anonymous editor of "harrassment" AGF issues again...
Click to read more »missionary activity - They go out and try to actively convert people to their faith, by various means. en:Mission (Christianity) would probably be a good start...
Click to read more »it was ok if they did so? Come on now, assume just a little bit of good faith. They may very well not know the policy well enough, but continually hammering...
Click to read more »@FahadMuhammed: While what you did is technically allowed, it can be seen as bad faith. If you try to influence anyone's "vote" here, this RfD may be closed with...
Click to read more »nominating an article is that the nominator is expected to make a good faith effort to find such sources. I am guessing by your wording in this and other...
Click to read more »en:wiki) doesn't have a separate article for cults based on the Christian faith. Frankly, I've never even heard of the phrase "Christian cult" before. I...
Click to read more »Rollback must never be used to revert in edit wars, or to remove good-faith changes. Use the undo feature for this, and give a reason. Rollback does...
Click to read more »BG7even 09:51, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Strong support I have the utmost faith n this excellent user, he will use his bureaucratic tools for good and nothing...
Click to read more »actual proof that any of this story is real. All we have is "Assume Good Faith" and that horse was beat to death weeks ago in this case. Let the poor horse...
Click to read more »- frankly, I fear exposure to viruses!). I've pitched in with some good-faith editing including a citation from a legitimate African electronic media...
Click to read more »2012 (UTC) Who called you immature? I just requested you to assume good faith instead of developing a rebuking attitude. Haify2 (talk) 21:12, 28 April...
Click to read more »rights would be very useful for me. I have never vandalised or acted in bad faith and of all the 30+ articles I've created only one has been deleted so I...
Click to read more »changing for roughly half-month, and has made around 50 reverts with good-faith and vandalism reverting in that period. So I can support h-im/er. curtaintoad...
Click to read more »some vandalism. I'm not sure why you called the edits you reverted "good faith", though -- so many of the same kind of edit on the same kind of article...
Click to read more »--Auntof6 (talk) 15:36, 15 June 2013 (UTC) I would say that was done in good faith; Oregonian added a category to an article MySweetMelissa edited before....
Click to read more »biased to me then Christianrocker90's and reek of an assumption of bad faith and a specific grudge held that he will not let go and quite possibly distinct...
Click to read more »Rambling Man (talk) 23:40, 25 June 2011 (UTC) Yes, I wanted to enable good faith mistakes, without being too draconian. The six month probation is basically...
Click to read more »One-strike is used on a case-by-case basis and is not used very much for good-faith editors. --Ferien (talk) 20:29, 6 July 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »can engage in feedback/see what other editors have to say. These are good faith edits, but I feel these pages are a case of test pages. User also created...
Click to read more »discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion. In good faith, I was trying to suggest User:SHB2000 not to say harsh words and hate speech...
Click to read more »always been very good-natured so people have been inclined to ascribe good faith to his efforts. --A. B. (talk) 12:56, 5 November 2010 (UTC) He seems to...
Click to read more »be a good idea. The 76.64.* range has got some edits that could be good faith, so I don't think there should be a range block there, just individual....
Click to read more »president while trying to place it into his profession. These were good faith edits, reverted and never addressed via the ip's talk page. All of the "vandalism"...
Click to read more »accounts. A review of their edit history confirms that they were acting in bad faith and only engaging in disruptive editing. Therefore, I kindly request that...
Click to read more »Readers come here looking for information, and when they find jokes they lose faith in our reliability. Not everyone is looking for humor – When an editor will...
Click to read more »You are right AE, my block was way to harsh. I should have assumed good faith. I have unblocked and restored all changes. If he ends up making unconstructive...
Click to read more »is necessary to identify a minimum size for a section, as being a good-faith effort to provide broad coverage in the section. This exemption for size...
Click to read more »22:51, 20 September 2021 (UTC) Keep as clearly notable. Speedy Keep as bad faith nom. Has an English Wikipedia article [1] and a Bangladesh Wikipedia article...
Click to read more »08:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC) Support I know Julian personally and have faith that he will not misuse the tools. Aren't the tools what RFA is about? Not...
Click to read more »Twinkle, giving very insightful and detailed feedback, not only assuming good faith (but seeing the good in others). All in all, thegooduser lives up to his...
Click to read more »impressions about Muslims for the broader society" (Patel, E. (2019). Out of Many Faiths: Religious Diversity and the American Promise. United States: Princeton...
Click to read more »he's never been out of Florida.". You have two userboxes explaining your faith, one saying "This user believes in God's promise with Noah." And also one...
Click to read more »do anything. -DJSasso (talk) 18:55, 29 June 2010 (UTC) The lack of good faith surprises me. If you say he is getting folk to move content, then prove...
Click to read more »salting them as we delete them? I doubt any IP has edited them in good faith yet, and don't see it happening any time soon. — This signed comment was...
Click to read more »of thing sums you up. I don't like using these words, but you assume bad faith. Basically what you have said above, is that you are worried that Archer7...
Click to read more »--Eptalon (talk) 16:57, 18 November 2011 (UTC) Support, per above, user's good faith seems obvious. Ajraddatz (talk) 18:11, 18 November 2011 (UTC) Support, per...
Click to read more »understatement). I understand that while most of my activities were in good faith (only I can know if they are or if they aren't), I surely didn't show it...
Click to read more »a weak spot on articles related to Islam, I think we should Assume good Faith and not scare them away. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in...
Click to read more »membership. The religious group would include only people who practice the faith, which not all in the ethnic group would. Second, Jewish is not the same...
Click to read more »that he was making useful edits. It couldn't hurt to have another good faith edit admin on here, could it? I know it won't. Support Loudclaw (talk) 02:12...
Click to read more »(UTC) With all due respect, you need to lighten up a bit, and have more faith in other users/admins. Every edit and action made doesn't have to be explicitly...
Click to read more »When you "ask" for a good faith commitment, is that not an admission of bad faith on your part? "Asking" for good faith commitments - i think is outside...
Click to read more »nothing but vandalism in the past few months, with the occasional good faith edit sprinkled in there. Thanks, Razorflame 21:10, 9 March 2009 (UTC) Since...
Click to read more »can incorporate into our local article. Please stop misinterpreting good faith comments - I voted keep, no? Hiàn (talk) 23:34, 14 February 2019 (UTC) In...
Click to read more »before it was deleted.THD3 (talk) 17:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC) Assuming good faith here. I have restored and moved the said article to userspace so that you...
Click to read more »indefinite blocks, but it seems to be a just one. Telecom is capable of good faith changes, however, and a review in a few months seems good. EhJJ sums up...
Click to read more »probably would not have made the block, but I believe it was made in good faith. EhJJTALK 15:51, 13 July 2009 (UTC) (ec) Which policy requires an admin...
Click to read more »of snowstorms... and bad weather... but anyway, you should assume good faith, as I always try to. :) Let's trust him for now, and be more slow on the...
Click to read more »doesn't have to be shown on the page itself to avoid deletion. If a good faith search shows the presence of sources existing then the article shouldn't...
Click to read more »creating X is Y in Z pages. Seems like GYH evading block? Or am I assuming bad faith? Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:48, 3 October 2021 (UTC) + 104.243.168.230...
Click to read more »concerns he has with the changes you make. Discuss those concerns in good faith and work toward agreement. If there are points you can't agree on, ask for...
Click to read more »2016. I've reverted to the edit immediately prior, although a lot of good faith edits in the meantime have been nullified by that. Thanks, Vermont (talk)...
Click to read more »the guideline says "The Assume Good Faith guideline does not require that editors continue to assume good faith in the presence of obvious contrary evidence...
Click to read more »to be able to listen to instructions now. So I feel we can assume good faith and allow him back, especially with the ban so easily re-applied. However...
Click to read more »139 (talk) 19:45, 7 October 2021 (UTC) Please stop this assuming of bad faith. I wrote delete below. You are in agreement with me, yet write things like...
Click to read more »Streisand Stevie Wonder American folk and country Johnny Cash Bing Crosby Faith Hill George Jones Peter, Paul and Mary Reba McEntire Dolly Parton Hank Williams...
Click to read more »late April 2013. I have got around 50 reverts (my contribs), some good faith rvts and vandal rvts. How I fight vandalism is I go to the recent changes...
Click to read more »does not have merit to be on Wikipedia. I declare my understanding in good faith of Wikipedia's rules. BenjaminGM (talk) 23:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »"consensus" is basically a unanimous decision (of users acting in good faith), but many people treat it as a majority rule (as "consens-Us-versus-Them")...
Click to read more »organised now. We just about manage to quell vandalism, tests and good-faith errors here just now, without adding 50 active, inexperienced users into...
Click to read more »User:Ely: Ah yes, a wild wikipedian/rogue wikipedian - in avoidance of good-faith editing. 89.8.121.2 (talk) 21:12, 22 December 2021 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »feeling you can make that call, but i'm not entirely certain you have the faith in yourself to be willing to make it. You're answer comes across as more...
Click to read more »talk page, what lead him to do this - I can't automatically assume bad faith, because that's wrong of me, but I have to voice my concern somewhere, because...
Click to read more »You reverted an edit on Ku Klux Klan with an edit summary "Reverted good faith edits by 62.49.127.26", then issued a final warning to the user for it....
Click to read more »be happening. The user has accused several editors of not assuming good faith. I personally believe that we've gone way beyond what is reasonably expected...
Click to read more »warned about following WP:BITE. I would suggest that you read that and WP:FAITH and take them to heart. If you do I think you could be a very strong contributor...
Click to read more »happens, you can drop me a line on my regular wiki talk page. Keep the faith, and Osiris, don't let me great DYK suggestion go to waste! Drmies (talk)...
Click to read more »be deleted. It is disgusting, inappropriate, and obviously made in bad faith. Agrave Banks --- (talk - contribs - email) 14:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »highlights this subject here on Wikipedia. I declare my understanding, in good faith, of Wikipedia's rules. BenjaminGM (talk) 20:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »bad faith is absurd, as if an admin was acting in bad faith, they would not remain an admin for very long. Presumably, admins never act in bad faith. Also...
Click to read more »or registered user to preempt the decision by removing the notice. Have faith that something sensible will be done. Remember, removing a page on appropriate...
Click to read more »user:Eptalon was saying.)--Remember to keep having Good Faith; the Good Faith you give approximates the Good Faith you get. 89.8.70.129 (talk) 20:47, 5 April 2022...
Click to read more »violate other policies like being civil (being kind) and assuming good faith. Etamni | ✉ | ✓ 14:54, 10 December 2015 (UTC). In consideration of the...
Click to read more »any way to change it. I like giving people chances, maybe I assume good faith to much, but to be honest I don't see a reason why you can't hear him out...
Click to read more »19:45, 17 April 2022 (UTC) Delete While the category was made in good faith, I agree with Ferien, this category doesn't define what "tallest people"...
Click to read more »not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Glossary 1 Wikipedia:How to copy-edit 1 Wikipedia:Image use policy good faith 1 Wikipedia:Peer review 8 Wikipedia:Recentchanges 1 Wikipedia:Requested...
Click to read more »not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request...
Click to read more »English-wiki? (Hard to believe, perhaps.) Instead Simple-wiki gets served a "Good-faith Agenda-pushing Table". I suggest that Simple English Wiki puts down the...
Click to read more »not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request...
Click to read more »understood WP:RBK and I know how to tell the difference between bad faith vandalism and good faith contributions. Examknowtalk 21:31, 21 May 2019 (UTC) Done --Peterdownunder...
Click to read more »20:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC) *"Keep" This article seems written in good faith, all facts, sources and references seem reliable and come from independent...
Click to read more »has begun a campaign against me after I nominated him for admin in good faith. But this is clearly over the line. Snow funn at tall (talk) 12:48, 21 April...
Click to read more »accusations and disqualifications of anyone or anything, please! NPOV and Good faith collaboration vs. coatrack article bordering on an attack page. The first...
Click to read more »exemplified below: An example of appropriate use is when (blatantly bad faith) attack accounts need to have their IPs blocked, to prevent further creation...
Click to read more »commented by Huji and Tygart. Although they look to have been created in good faith, perhaps it would be appropriate to analize all these articles, and see...
Click to read more »'crat. --Maxim(talk) 15:03, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Your oppose reeks of bad faith and false conjecture. Thank goodness that's what I won't be like. We even...
Click to read more »positive contributions. Wikipedia:Why create an account? Association of Good Faith Wikipedians Who Remain Unregistered on Principle As of 2019, the historical...
Click to read more »about this articles fictional "constitutional republics" but just citizens faith in the ability of a government to abide by its constitution, its charter...
Click to read more »if it appropriate to use it in certain instances. He also assumes good faith more than any user I have came across on Wikimedia, and is always kind in...
Click to read more »recent check brought up issue which makes me vote oppose." That is not good faith especially when he tarnished FSM's record with FSM has done no wrong. --...
Click to read more »This is a discussion and not a room for accusations. Please assume good faith. Mastashat (talk) 09:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC) I don't endorse vandalism...
Click to read more »of the nominator, which I se quite a significant lack of assuming good faith when nominating articles for deletion, and reverting "vandalism", but this...
Click to read more »that make similar edits are also disruptive, they can be acting in good faith. Ravensfire (talk) 19:46, 6 April 2025 (UTC) Thank you @Ravensfire for understanding...
Click to read more »a week now and I have done quite a lot of good reverts (both gd and bad-faith) and stayed out of trouble (other than removing a late RfA vote). For the...
Click to read more »notable enough for Wikipedia in my eyes. Again, I suggest you assume good faith (in other words, think people are doing things to try help improve Wikipedia)...
Click to read more »21:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC) OBJECTION! I am a good user that assumes good faith and you treat me like crap! A1a4s (talk) 21:45, 21 February 2009 (UTC) But...
Click to read more »complaint, attributing the wording is usually sufficient to establish good faith. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC) I agree with mac on this...
Click to read more »you've barely edited here. With regard to the reason, kindly assume good faith. I have been an administrator on this project just shy of two years, and...
Click to read more »I understand rollback is meant for obvious vandalism and not for good-faith changes. I always check the context before reverting to avoid mistakes....
Click to read more »oppsition to the self-nom, and, in fact, as a gesture of assuming good faith and all that is right with Vermont, move to support. ;) --Mareklug (talk)...
Click to read more »and leadership.(https://ajuniorvc.com/how-astrotalks-puneet-gupta-turned-faith-into-funding/) Named in Business Today’s "Top 15 Emerging CEOs". (https://www...
Click to read more »They had a choice. They chose to publish what they did. As I have little faith in anyone who promoted anti-Semitism, I don't find your references to be...
Click to read more »just about the only reason that any userbox about a person's background, faith, what have you, can legitimately live here. (3) The line between censorship...
Click to read more »same page, at the same time. I think the accounts were editing in good faith but editing on multiple accounts at the same time breaks some alt account...
Click to read more »a good contributor with a strong desire to help, always acting in good faith. Almost every error and problematic usage on Wikipedia can be corrected...
Click to read more »making an issue out of it. Why do I think the block was unfair? Because good faith was not assumed. Before the block, I was a mentor for newcomers (simplewiki...
Click to read more »too rough. That assumption can be misleading and risks discouraging good-faith contributors. In this case, the article was written by me, not by AI. I've...
Click to read more »pointing out issues with his changes. Those changes may have been done in good faith, but they show that he either doesn't understand our practices and procedures...
Click to read more »restored sourced information. I understand that we should always assume good faith, but as mentioned above, that is sourced information. And, I also stopped...
Click to read more »I've been working on rescuing articles (i.e. those that IPs create in good faith but qualify for quick deletion), creating articles by simplifying en articles...
Click to read more »they have done has been 'in good faith' - using multiple accounts to try to win arguments is an inherently bad faith action. Since their block, their...
Click to read more »since 2008 when he was last properly active! Whilst I am assuming good faith throughout this nomination and giving my reasons as above (Inactivity, may...
Click to read more »between being blunt and being rude. I do think you need to assume good faith more often, you've accused several editors of being "disruptive" just in...
Click to read more »the situation in Europe at the time, they were unable to practice their faith. Like most Anabaptists, Amish (and Mennonites, and Hutterites) were from...
Click to read more »to Wikipedia activities as other users. And your statement about his bad faith is at the same time a violation of the rules of WP:AGF and WP:CIV (because...
Click to read more »guidelines and should not use it for edit-wars or use it to revert good-faith edits, as I can use Twinkle for that. Thank's for your consideration. --Cuddles9999...
Click to read more »successful or not, to call it half-baked is definitely not Assuming Good Faith, and detracts from the process altogether. The nominator may withdraw the...
Click to read more »does not show me enough about his personality and style to have enough faith to support him. While there are ample edits for the time he has been here...
Click to read more »helpful suggestions about how to improve this article. I am here in good faith, and I would very much like to learn to be a better writer of Simple English...
Click to read more »certain users connecting the pages on Wikidata, whether in good or bad faith. It does not necessarily mean that the “other languages” versions are properly...
Click to read more »Davey2010? I'm an editor just like you with all that respect and due good faith that applies. I want to make the wiki a better place like any other editor...
Click to read more »awards. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 06:45, 5 June 2021 (UTC) I have faith that Vermont knows the criteria. It is quite clear. What is not a QD is...
Click to read more »someone convinced enough by their faith to declare it publicly? This may be a culture thing - open declarations of faith in the UK are frowned upon, to say...
Click to read more »user has made more edits than almost everyone. He has edited in very good faith, and I haven't been noticing any trouble. Everybody makes mistakes, only...
Click to read more »I've done that before. After a awhile, it does become hard to assume good faith. I think you can improve in this department as you've shown improvement...
Click to read more »believe in Wikipedia:IPs are human too from enwiki. I always assume good faith before making a decision or action. I believe that IPs are just as good...
Click to read more »pages for false reasons, it is getting harder and harder to assume good faith here. Pure Evil (talk) 00:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC) Comment: It might...
Click to read more »Requests for deletion/Requests/2010/Wikipedia:Assume bad faith Requests for deletion/Requests/2010/Wikipedia:Esperanza Requests for...
Click to read more »would consider my interaction with Razorflame to be positive. I assume good faith and that his execution of admin tasks would also be helpful and useful....
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) You don't need to apologise! You created the article in good faith, so no one has any problems with that! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 08:47...
Click to read more »Please remember that an underlying tenet of Wikipedia is to Assume Good Faith, I am sure this is not being done with any bad intent. Again this is just...
Click to read more »are good (-faith, at least). If it were up to me, I'd have +Rollback'd already. Can't we just remove the rights if vandalism or bad faith reverting does...
Click to read more »this, but if Davey2010 withdraws the edit summary, and BZPN assumes good faith and communicates before interpreting policies in the wrong way, I will consider...
Click to read more »with bots and AWB is in my opinion good, as, even though we assume good faith with peoples spelling, there are still a few stuff ups. The AWB typo tool...
Click to read more »People in the past have said it helps the admin or whoever count. But I have faith that administrators are able to count without the help of aids. -Djsasso...
Click to read more »meaningful history is a valid deletion reason. Of course this refers to good faith users. Yeah nuke should have the option to use prefilled reasons, that might...
Click to read more »redlinks. JC and I (and others) participate in the VGA process with good faith. We never said the criteria were correct, in fact I've been a strong opponent...
Click to read more »whether a guideline or policy concerning it exists. Generally I assume good faith when a page is created, especially if the page was actually not bad. Users...
Click to read more »just because they lack sources. Like on en you are expected to make a good faith search for sources before nominating anything which is why people often...
Click to read more »not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request...
Click to read more »not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request...
Click to read more »thinks they should do the opposite on. And he frequently never assumes good faith on new editors and he never assumes it on IPs. Uses off-wiki means to keep...
Click to read more »and my contributions, IMHO, show the ability to distinguish good and bad faith edits. It would also be helpful in situations like this, this and this where...
Click to read more »am an administrator. My philosophy on trust is defined by "assume good faith" - if you have a fair number of edits, I "automatically" trust you. Unless...
Click to read more »2011 (UTC) I am an editor in good standing at en.wp. Please assume good faith, as those wikihounding warnings ultimately stem from a series of controversial...
Click to read more »event, most of which would be bannable violations of policy but lets assume faith there and just let it go with the CoI issues. And to deal with the "IPs...
Click to read more »deflag your bot or block your bot, because I know you are acting in good faith, but you need to be very careful in the future to have your bot make only...
Click to read more »encyclopedia, and that must take precedence. My report was filed in good faith, to that end; and I can also state, that if it is the consensus here that...
Click to read more »that have a different view??--The good news, is that an assumption of good faith, is expected of all wikipedia-users.--Signed, an-IP-from-NordicSubcontinentThingy...
Click to read more »months now. During this time, I have been undoing vandalism and other bad-faith edits to help improve Wikipedia. I have been using Twinkle for my edits...
Click to read more »article into a simple English article, and I hate to see a potential good faith new contributor being made feel unwelcome here. There are only five other...
Click to read more »Hippopotamus (talk) 01:43, 24 July 2008 (UTC) Oh my. The "significance? of his faith" Hmm, I'm guessing that none of you ever read his book. He said over and...
Click to read more »join the discussion and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~...
Click to read more »not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request...
Click to read more »was doing what any good faith editor should have done. Kindlt and IP, you're going WAY over the top here and ignoring good faith and justified edits. Not...
Click to read more »certainly not assuming good faith. It is clear this article needs an update, so there is no reason to suggest bad faith. IWI (chat) 22:52, 14 June 2020...
Click to read more »En-wiki does not have the title.--Do i think that the title, is non-goodFaith?--Well, i think it should be Deleted, because the title is not a known subject...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) First of all be polite, this is a basic rule to assume good faith towards other users. Secondly, you seem afraid of the usercheck, what’s...
Click to read more »Should Stay. It passes GNG and NActor. There seems to be deliberate "bad faith" actions occurring in the AFD discussion. I feel bad for this professional...
Click to read more »it then start doing research to fact check them. This isn't done in bad faith but mostly due to the fact simple wikipedia is quite lacking massively and...
Click to read more »Streisand Stevie Wonder American folk and country Johnny Cash Bing Crosby Faith Hill George Jones Peter, Paul and Mary Reba McEntire Dolly Parton Hank Williams...
Click to read more »the removal of a once very active CU/OS, I can't (at least not in good faith) place the same requirements as I would normally - especially with Barras'...
Click to read more »od bad faith. Just because they are IPs does not mean they are vandals that should be ignored. Yes, there will be people using IPs in bad faith but that...
Click to read more »this. Either fix the situation or don't tag. Not to say this isn't a good faith idea. I just don't think it should be done. That being said I will leave...
Click to read more »Since my last request, I have reverted at least fifty edits made in bad faith. I did not revert these just to get this right, but I just looked at recent...
Click to read more »admin and an IP should have equal weight as long as they're both in good faith and can provide good reasons). Not much has changed consciously for me,...
Click to read more »join the discussion and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~...
Click to read more »join the discussion and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~...
Click to read more »reconsider your request provided your work stays good and I will assume good faith on the issues I have listed. -- Enfcer (talk) 03:10, 22 July 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:59, 6 August 2023 (UTC) Keep Some editors want to delete in bad faith or maybe they don't know how Indian news article's works and they are not...
Click to read more »et cetera, going on?--If my question is viewed as a Good-faith question, about Good-faith edits by others, then fine.--If articles are not okay, then...
Click to read more »another editor who gets the tools and quits. Not so, but extremely bad faith on your part. I admit not being the most active editor here - but I have...
Click to read more »in Islam in the relevant article? I dont doubt that you did this in good faith, but (a) that too seems to be out of touch with reality, and the reality...
Click to read more »coverage. But I'd also like to say that I believe this nom was done in good faith and I don't believe it to be egocentric. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 02:24...
Click to read more »have a variety of nominations so please view my nominations in very good faith. In the case of withdrawing for VGA, I would prefer to withdraw Carter's...
Click to read more »(talk) 05:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC) @Myatrrcc Watch it and assume good faith. These sources are deprecated; this is a fact. They are not reliable sources...
Click to read more »associated with the previously locked user. I’m editing this article in good faith using independently verifiable references. The subject is notable, and I’m...
Click to read more »deliberate spammy sites to create sources, it's not worth the time from good-faith editors to review, source and fix utter junk from paid editors. Ravensfire...
Click to read more »Their user talk page is basically an attack against editors who in good faith ask them not to attack them (they are attacking the same people QSS did)...
Click to read more »join the discussion and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~...
Click to read more »join the discussion and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~...
Click to read more »join the discussion and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~...
Click to read more »changes would help me a lot. ExplorerofSpace (talk) Not done While I do have faith that you would use rollback properly, I'm only seeing a couple undos by...
Click to read more »possible (and unfortunately relatively frequent) for some people to, in good faith, accidentally edit logged out. I do not know if that's what happened here...
Click to read more »difference between the two, I am not convinced that you are engaging in good faith. Please refrain from personal attacks on this page if you wish to convince...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Oppose I'd like to assume as much good faith as possible, but oversighted diffs were posted to RfCU by you back in December...
Click to read more »at) or is that about a person possibly doing a clean start, assuming good faith in that point? -Barras talk 14:03, 6 July 2025 (UTC) I’m also curious since...
Click to read more »(UTC) @HorseBro the hemionus please WP:AGF. The article is clearly a good faith effort by a legitimate editor. The editor's block on enwiki has no bearing...
Click to read more »deleted. Lotte van Dam (talk) 08:36, 30 April 2026 (UTC) Please assume good faith on Wikipedia. There is no reason to speculate that this is in any way related...
Click to read more »~2025-36630-44 (talk) 20:07, 26 November 2025 (UTC) There's an obviously bad-faith quick delete nomination of an article Polygnotus created recently from the...
Click to read more »hate spending my time reviewing a lot of edits from someone acting in bad faith. Ravensfire (talk) 20:39, 16 April 2026 (UTC) Another example of subtle...
Click to read more »significant good-faith edits to the page. " This is exactly the point, other users should be allowed sufficient time to make good-faith edits to the page...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC) I really, really want to assume good faith, and not sound bitey or anything, but may I venture to ask one question:...
Click to read more »recent changes for bad-faith edits, and some even have this page on their watchlists. Semi-protection will allow for good-faith users to contribute while...
Click to read more »join the discussion and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~...
Click to read more »join the discussion and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~...
Click to read more »join the discussion and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~...
Click to read more »join the discussion and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~...
Click to read more »join the discussion and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~...
Click to read more »join the discussion and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~...
Click to read more »another wiki so that we can see you have experience judging between good faith attempt and vandalism. -DJSasso (talk) 18:34, 6 January 2010 (UTC) Na'vi (talk ·...
Click to read more »Joe meet 'WP:GNG', which is the 'keep' side's main point. I assumed good faith of Auntof6, but now we can clearly see that she is quite biased in this...
Click to read more »more of against standards No, it's not. Requests like this made in good faith are a part of Wikipedia's process and suggesting otherwise is not helpful...
Click to read more »good faith. To replace the US flag with a version when it only had 48 stars or to replace it with the UK flag in not an edit made in good faith. You do...
Click to read more »information on here and the English Wikipedia. If they are here in good faith, we can determine that in an appeal. Best regards, Vermont 🐿️ (talk) 03:26...
Click to read more »reasoning early on would have helped me make the necessary improvements in good faith Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 12:00, 27 July 2025 (UTC) The "second reason"...
Click to read more »join the discussion and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~...
Click to read more »log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) This account has been only used in bad faith page creations. They keep on making pages about Diddy that have the same...
Click to read more »Anekantavada · Asser · Atheism · Augustinian theodicy · Badnjak (Serbian) · Bahá'í Faith · Beth Hamedrash Hagodol · Blue men of the Minch · Bonshō · Cardinal-nephew...
Click to read more »anonymous IP on defamatory and unestablished remarks. Not really the good faith that you put forward on your profile... Kind regards, Simple english pic...
Click to read more »offensive material whatsoever. I would recommend @PotsdamLamb to assume good faith as much as possible. BRP ever 07:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC) Done Dealt with...
Click to read more »editors, but would an admin mind deleting the two new junk articles? Good faith editors have already reviewed them and probably not knowing the history...
Click to read more »frankly, you need to calm down. Of course I assume good faith, but I don't assume good faith when you comment on me rudely. Hockeycatcat (talk) (changes)...
Click to read more »luck. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:06, 5 July 2011 (UTC) Please assume good faith. You don't need to warn other people to be civil; the expectation that they...
Click to read more »which i tried to pinged first in the place have ruthlessly making an WP:Bad faith editorial styled quorums over every subordinate article letted with Jats...
Click to read more »understood by comparing it to "assume good faith." It's a bit like "don't assume good faith or bad faith; don't assume anything." During the four years...
Click to read more »join the discussion and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~...
Click to read more »QD backlog. I also atleast once a day will go through all the likely bad faith edits in the RC feed and will check for open proxies. Often times I will...
Click to read more »Kinfauns: A Legacy of Faith, Exile, and Return |url=https://medium.com/@john_6172/the-catholic-lord-kinfauns-a-legacy-of-faith-exile-and-return-67974751eddc...
Click to read more »boundaries of discussion (polite, heated, or otherwise). Calling a good faith editor deceitful is wildly off the mark and insulting – and an excellent...
Click to read more »RFD. My thoughts are in line with those of Lee. If there is a future good-faith effort in user space (by someone NOT blocked globally) to build on this...
Click to read more »discussion. Anyone who disagrees with you gets accused of not assuming good faith, and you discount what they have to say. You also don't get to throw out...
Click to read more »homepage of a spam cite amongst cites randomly. I'm all for assuming good faith but it's not like they randomly inserted a BBC news piece in the wrong place...
Click to read more »IPs, and then a user @HeTojiFushigoro that is refusing to engage in good faith with the content and just reverting to satisfy their own ego. Please someone...
Click to read more »also an public Hate Speech. Wikipedia always teaches us to assume good faith and not to spread hatred. Qylt (talk) 00:49, 23 January 2025 (UTC) Qylt...
Click to read more »non-denominational Faith Based Organisation Partners for Hope Stabilization and Transformation (PAHSTA) is a non-denomination faith based National NGO...
Click to read more »production 1169 doubt 1170 attend 1171 speech 1172 taste 1173 camp 1174 faith 1175 soldier 1176 conference 1177 fresh 1178 glad 1179 strength 1180 structure...
Click to read more »Larrymhardy (talk) 19:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC) They seem to be more in good-faith, i've seen their edits, it's only been redirect creations (to pretty questionable...
Click to read more »could some leeway be given to these editors as they are editing in good faith to create articles relating to Singapore (where Wikimania is happening)...
Click to read more »talk header. -- Auntof6 (talk) 09:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC) When they make good faith edits, but their summary is offensive, is rollback with a warning suitable...
Click to read more »articles, and the only downside being a small wait for indexing on good faith articles. Enwiki also has w:WP:autopatrolled permission. Whilst not part...
Click to read more »/original poster My Twinkle tool is not working specially rollback, Good Faith, Revert Vandal features. When I try to click on rollback it gives reply...
Click to read more »on other articles.)--If one does not have Good Faith in others, then why should others have good faith in that one.--Please also explain which discussion...
Click to read more »your block, which is not allowed and while you may be "evading it in good-faith", it is extremely disruptive so please stop. --Ferien (talk) 17:06, 3 February...
Click to read more »community' over the years, a large portion of the rest have contributed good faith edits and moved on, the rest are vandals and schoolkids messing about. In...
Click to read more »