Redirect to:
simplification, no {{inuse}}, and no attribution to their original location ({{enwp based}}) will be deleted. (A3) A7 has become our A4, and A6 is slightly different...
Click to read more »en:WP:Esperanza This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »current head of MIT, I find an EnWP article (en:L. Rafael Reif) which details his career, and what he did in the past, and the EnWP article is quite at the top...
Click to read more »QD tagging. I occassionally work on WP:PGA or may create few stubs. And of course, SN. Back at enWP, I work at WP:NOVELS Yes, Simple News is Very important...
Click to read more »in her mid twenties; we also got an article on enWp en:Meghan Jadhav ands Indonesian Wikipedia. The EnWP article probably has some usable references (in...
Click to read more »en:WP:CANVAS This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Originally an EnWP copy-pase, with a qd tag. The problem is: the EnWP article itslef is labeled as needing more sources...
Click to read more »it. I have rollback both here and on enWP and I use it whenever I see vandalism. I feel that I have always been WP:CIVIL and can't remember a time I've...
Click to read more »at Enwp (en:American Descendants of Slavery). Our article has two main problems though: It consists of 2-3 unsourced sentences. Looking at the Enwp article...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: The article is a complete copy-and-paste from enWP and is also an outdated version. --§ Snake311 (I'm Not Okay!) 00:13, 12 January...
Click to read more »it appears you may not completely understand how our policies differ from enWP, particularly in relationship to blocked or banned users. I'm hesitant to...
Click to read more »for the reason: Notabliity difficult to judge. There is an article on enWp (en:Jayant Sinha, but it is about a an Indian politician. Also, very few Indian...
Click to read more »enwp page, at en:Aisi Deewangi Dekhi Nahi Kahi, and there seem to be pages in Hindi and Indonesian. I have to admit though, that at least on the EnWP...
Click to read more »few sources to establish notability. Some sites in the external links of enWP are fine, but no other reliable sources for establishment of notability.<fontsize=4px>And...
Click to read more »points stated above. Delete The bronze medal was in a competition that enWP article doesn't even consider enough for an article. No legitimate claim...
Click to read more »Buenos Aires, born 1977. What we have is a basically an article from EnWp draft space en:Draft:Mariela_Anchipi, which looks like it was translated from Spanish...
Click to read more »not because they believe the status of tibet should change. If I read the enWP article correctly, Tibet depends on Chinese (or other aid). Most of the economy...
Click to read more »about a Japanese TV series, "translated" from either EnWP or JaWP. Originally listed as A3 - EnWP copypaste, I will honor the author's comment on the talk...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:RAWP:RA WP:REQUESTWP:REQUEST WP:REQWP:REQ If you add a request, make sure you give a link to the subject's article in English or other Wikipedia(s)...
Click to read more »about the Simple English Wikipedia. For the English Wikipedia, please see en:WP:VRT. Help:Contents Wikipedia:Contact us Wikipedia:Simple talk meta:VRT...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. As EnWp copypaste ('QD-A3'). A simplified version might stand a chance, this is just...
Click to read more »for deletion was to Delete. Speedied by me, cross-wiki promotion at enWP & arzWP --Griff (talk) 03:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC) Ahmed Alhemyari ( YouTube )...
Click to read more »all be deleted as far as I am concerned. From what we see on the ones on EnWP they are mostly in a state of decay, with spam, vandalism and bad information...
Click to read more »en:WP:DEAL This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »is based on an EnWP article which has since been deleted (en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brijwood). The respective discussion on EnWP is from 2016,...
Click to read more »on another article on ENWP, where the incident took place. It may be worth creating a List of incidents on Wikipedia, like on ENWP, and merge it with that...
Click to read more »in a few months. Goblin 15:34, 20 July 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Shappy! Oppose per en:WP:NOTNOW. -Djsasso (talk) 15:34, 20 July 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. 'Involuntary' and 'Voluntary' are disambigs in enWP, and I think it is likely they will become so here. It's the conceptual aspects...
Click to read more »Sarkozy's blog, - English, French, Hungarians references - and the page on FrWP and EnWP, I haven't improved it myself. It's the French, and English wikipedian's...
Click to read more »of the monthly English Wikipedia en:WP:Signpost document, under subpages for various publication dates, such as: en:WP:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-01-24/Technology_report...
Click to read more »invalidating refs 1, 7, 8, 12 and 15. on the essay enwp have on cryptocurrency notability, w:en:Wikipedia:Notability (cryptocurrencies)#Arguments to...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Delete. Our community is different form EnWP in many ways; we therefore do not need this template, currently. Also, per...
Click to read more »en:WP:TPS This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep because they meet en:WP:NFOOTBALL. -DJSasso (talk) 02:24, 13 November 2014 (UTC) comment - as editor...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason:A short blurb on a person who also has an EnWP article. The article we have is very short, just a few sentences, and has...
Click to read more »British ambassador/diplomat. There's an article at EnWP (), but in my book, neither the aricle at EnWP, nor the one we have gives a clue why this person...
Click to read more »alumnus of the school. The EnWP article doesn't give details on his schooling. Note that the article was deleted from EnWP, for lacking sourrces. I suggest...
Click to read more »en:WP:MOSSIS This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »en:WP:MAGIC This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »en:WP:REDDEAL This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »en:WP:NWEB This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »en:WP:FIRST This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »en:WP:NOTBROKEN This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: What we have is pretty much the EnWP version of the page (with attribution). In addition, only 0.5% of the Bhutanese...
Click to read more »several problems, though: First of all we probably got a 1:1 copy of the EnWp article, secondly, two thirds of the article are tables, saying what role...
Click to read more »reporting. It's seems to be like a NOTNEWS etc. I will state that many of the enwp voters just say meets notablity, the sources at the time is valid for notablity...
Click to read more »from the English Wikipedia article [[:en:Plant]]. (for English Wikipedia articles) Or use the template {{enwp based}} on the new articles's talk page...
Click to read more »Meets en:WP:BASIC and I would say just about meets en:WP:NGAME too. –Davey2010Talk 00:17, 16 July 2024 (UTC) I take it by en:BASIC you mean en:WP:BASIC...
Click to read more »November 2014 (UTC) Keep. Meets en:WP:NFOOTBALL because he played in J. League Division 1. Neither en:WP:NFOOTBALL nor en:WP:BLPNOTE trump each other: either...
Click to read more »16 November 2014 (UTC) Keep. Meets en:WP:NFOOTBALL because he played in Ligue 1. Neither en:WP:NFOOTBALL nor en:WP:BLPNOTE trump each other: either can...
Click to read more »November 2014 (UTC) Keep. Meets en:WP:NFOOTBALL because he played in J. League Division 1. Neither en:WP:NFOOTBALL nor en:WP:BLPNOTE trump each other: either...
Click to read more »November 2014 (UTC) Keep. Meets en:WP:NFOOTBALL because he played in J. League Division 1. Neither en:WP:NFOOTBALL nor en:WP:BLPNOTE trump each other: either...
Click to read more »England. I have rewritten it, so that we no longer have a copy of enwp. When I look at the EnWP page though, there is the claim that this might have been an...
Click to read more »shows/socialite. What we seem to have is a copy-past of the EnWP article (with no link yet). Direct enwp copy-paste aside, I think the refernce section is problematic...
Click to read more »November 2014 (UTC) Keep. Meets en:WP:NFOOTBALL because he played in J. League Division 1. Neither en:WP:NFOOTBALL nor en:WP:BLPNOTE trump each other: either...
Click to read more »reliability (or lack thereof) of the cited sources, however I do think that en:WP:FRINGE does not apply here. Chenzw Talk 10:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep because they meet en:WP:NFOOTBALL. -DJSasso (talk) 02:22, 13 November 2014 (UTC) comment - as editor...
Click to read more »Or article had no sources, and there's an EnWP artile, which is also very short, and also has one source (en:Kodlamane). So I guess its best to delete...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Redirect not needed. Not present in EnWP. Word is part of the common name of places so adds complexity. Point pushing...
Click to read more »deletion was to Keep. Redirected to Multiverse, which already exists, per enWP naming standard fr33kman talk 01:11, 24 August 2009 (UTC) Alternate universe...
Click to read more »would expect more Interwiki links than Persian and (probably) Arabic in the enwp article. I would expect languages such as Spanish or perhaps French (which...
Click to read more »nominated for quick deletion, seems to be a copy-paste of the respective enwp article (en:Sant Soyarabai). Personally, I think we should go through the regular...
Click to read more »November 2014 (UTC) Keep. Meets en:WP:NFOOTBALL because he played in J. League Division 1. Neither en:WP:NFOOTBALL nor en:WP:BLPNOTE trump each other: either...
Click to read more »en:WP:BABY This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »en:WP:NEWSORGNIGERIA This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »en:WP:NORG This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »en:WP:CITEVAR This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »en:WP:NSCHOOL This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »basically an EnWP copy-paste. When I deleted it, the article was close to 60kb of unsimplified text. 3-4 editors kept adding stuff from EnWp, without simplifying...
Click to read more »search on this term (in quotes) and there is no usage of it whatsoever. enWP does have a page but it is a redirect to Republican and conservative support...
Click to read more »w:en:WP:AES This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »w:en:WP:LYRICS This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »paste of the EnWP article. I cut it down to a three or four sentence stub, but looking at it now it still looks very "promotional". The EnWP version is...
Click to read more »does Enwp have an articles about the political climate between two countries? --Eptalon (talk) 23:41, 17 February 2011 (UTC) Just FYI, yes, en WP does...
Click to read more »me, this looks like at attempt at televangelism. There is an article at EnWP (en:Peace TV). If I believe the article, they are located in Dubai, were founded...
Click to read more »The vocabulary and sentences structures are complex. It is copied from EnWP without attribution by an obvious sock who was making a habit of disruptive...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Delete. Non-notable businessman; also deleted on EnWP for failing notability for a politician--Eptalon (talk) 10:53, 26 February...
Click to read more »(Do we? See this under the English WP.) Is is poorly written and quite possibly a subject better left to the enWP at first but it is not nonsense. (That's...
Click to read more »notable? - Besides, our article is very close to the EnWP one, and it was originally listed as 'A3' (EnWp copy without attribution). Comments? Eptalon (talk)...
Click to read more »done nothing notable. Naddruf (talk) 20:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC) EnWp redirects her to en:Double Take (group). Double take seems to have been a short-lived...
Click to read more »to Delete. New encyclopedic article created at Yubeshi, recipe moved to EnWP Wikibooks (Cooking?)--Eptalon (talk) 08:18, 28 July 2018 (UTC) Kurumiyubesi...
Click to read more »Large (1400+ employees) law firm founded by merger in 2016; there is an EnWP page (en:Gowling_WLG), from which we have the blurb. My problem is towofold:...
Click to read more »she can be deemed as fulfilled ANYBIO #1 (en:WP:ANYBIO) as well as GNG. The issue is that will this be in en:WP:BLP1E but I don't think this is 1E as there...
Click to read more »was recently reorganised, and the status of Ladakh changed. Also note, the EnWP article has a map, where some territories are marked Pakistan-occupied territory...
Click to read more »Sanscrit (?) script also blog posts. No corresponding page on EnWP. There is a town, [1] on EnWP with snippets of the same unsourced legends. Original research...
Click to read more »every article writer is a copyviolator. Also, although you are a sysop on ENWP, you only have two article edits, and this is your first edit for almost...
Click to read more »notable, see en:Ngarrindjeri; What I see as problematic is that the article is (to my liking) too short to be a stub. If I look at the EnWP article, scientits...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Except for an EnWp article (since moved/deleted), there really is only social media about her...
Click to read more »need to be obtained to achive en:WP:SIGCOV. Also WP:FOLLOW, this piece is deleted / moved to draftspace twice in enWP for good reasons, refer to this...
Click to read more »July 2019 (UTC) Note: The article has been moved to Ashurst LLP, same as EnWP.--Eptalon (talk) 09:33, 20 July 2019 (UTC) Ashurst (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »Especially with there being a similar article on the EnWP, it seems important to cover on the SEnWP as well.Voyager640 (talk) 04:01, 13 March 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Delete. Our article was pretty close to EnWp, and as outlined, not really that notable/no clear sources that show the...
Click to read more »an award for one movie he starred in. There's an EnWp article, and a Bengali-language one. The EnWP article is tagged as needing more sources. Big question...
Click to read more »good, but this is a principle worth inclusion in an encyclopedia. See the EnWP article. --Gotanda (talk) 23:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Delete Pure dicdef...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet the WP:GNG or en:WP:WEB guidelines. There is no significant coverage from reliable sources...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail en:WP:NGRIDIRON and en:WP:NCOLLATH; as well as WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 23:35, 2 April 2021 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »19:03, 14 January 2025 (UTC) @68.107.182.234, Please read en:WP:Notability, en:WP:NSCHOOL and en:WP:GNG to gain a better understanding of why it was nominated...
Click to read more »two language codes: {{subst:Babel-2|es-3|en-1}}. This looks like this: You may also use the code {{#Babel:es-3|en-1}} to get a similar effect. It is simpler...
Click to read more »No valid reason given for deletion, User:Cactus0rme please read en:WP:BEBOLD and en:WP:SOFIXIT, It makes no sense sending it here on the basis of "it's...
Click to read more »English [our] alternative will come up as the top search result (as it does on EnWP). Adding this will just create ambiguity, not clarify it. This opens up endless...
Click to read more »far as RedWarn (software) it does work on simple. It has to be pulled from enWP until the UltraViolet team puts in somewhere else. — Preceding unsigned comment...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Delete. EnWp mentions a legendary King 'Eugenius I' or 'Evenus I' at en:Legendary_kings_of_Scotland, we don't get accession...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Probably a 1:1 copy of the respective EnWP article, created by an IP editor. Our copy now includes a number of templates...
Click to read more »Delete. Parent list was deleted; this list had three entries. Looking at EnWp en:Cateogory:Afghan scientists, there seem to be about 10, in total. Not opposed...
Click to read more »it pass WP:N in light of the media coverage? If it does it'd only be for single-event notability. fr33kman talk 15:27, 5 October 2009 (UTC) EnWp lumps all...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:RFUWP:RFU WP:DRVWP:DRV If you think a review of a deletion discussion is needed, please list it here and say why. Users can then comment...
Click to read more »be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - The enWP article on which this seems to be based, although not attributed, has itself...
Click to read more »physicist and an economist. Consensus below looks like a delete. EnWp has a category en:Category:Albanian scientists. Note that this deletion does not preclude...
Click to read more »this is a copy-paste from EnWP, vwhich still needs a rewrite, to be understandable by our audience. Given that this is an ENWP copy-paste we probably also...
Click to read more »on his EnWp talk page, let's see... Eptalon (talk) 11:03, 14 December 2025 (UTC) I think we still have a problem, If I look at TRMs edits at enwp, I get...
Click to read more »Delete. Doesn't look like there's in-depth coverage, page was deleted on EnWp a few years ago, consesus below is also to delete--Eptalon (talk) 08:52,...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Also see the EnWp RfD ; In short, this actor isn't notable yet.--Eptalon (talk) 22:24, 25 July...
Click to read more »scientific papers, see Google Scholar [1]. This may make him notable under en:WP:ACADEMIC. Lights and freedom (talk) 03:11, 2 December 2022 (UTC) A dozen...
Click to read more »information can be found by using your changes list. Shortcuts WP:SIG#NLWP:SIG#NL WP:SIG#Non-LatinWP:SIG#Non-Latin Users with non-Latin usernames are welcome...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep - per winner of national title. I see this as sufficient to meet en:WP:ANYBIO#1 and there are enough sources to justify basic GNG. GNG isn't based...
Click to read more »probably notble; what we have here is an unformatted (probably copy/paste) from EnWP. The options we have are wikify/cleanup, or delete, and hope someone re-creates...
Click to read more »obviously notable per GNG (c.f. the Impact and influence in enwp version) which also fulfills en:/Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles#7...
Click to read more »votes. WP:POLICY — We could probably use more policies of our own than looking at en.wikipedia policy. Let's create more proposed policy. WP:ST and WP:AN...
Click to read more »are presumed notable - I'm going by en:WP:POLOUTCOMES, en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Burke (elected) and en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kendall...
Click to read more »Very little reliable, independent coverage on this person, despite the en:WP:REFBOMB in the article. Some sources featured are similar in nature, with...
Click to read more »search and iMDB search reveal no planned movie by this title. No article on enWP. WP is not a crystal ball. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in...
Click to read more »Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: EnWp has an article about the band, en:The Party (band). I conclude that the band members on their...
Click to read more »Horatio (talk) 14:47, 23 March 2009 (UTC) redirect to Michael Barrymore like enWP or delete. This person is alone not notable. --Barras (talk) 20:45, 23 March...
Click to read more »doable at another such committee; hoever given the relatiobnnship to en, I dont think enwp abcom would be a good one. Ideas? --Eptalon (talk) 14:12, 14 February...
Click to read more »You should only write things that should be in an encyclopedia. Shortcut WP:NOTBLOCKEDWP:NOTBLOCKED Some special rules need to be used for the Simple...
Click to read more »Delete. If 'Uncanny valley' really means what EnWp says, this is a term completely unsuitable for SimpleWp; you could likry say 'movie with antropomorphic...
Click to read more »@Arthurfan828: I think you mean en:WP:BLP1E, yes it applies here. However, if they can meet WP:GNG based on the 1 event or en:WP:NACTOR using that 1 event,...
Click to read more »Comment: BTW, just because enWP doesn't have the article doesn't mean we shouldn't. I consider the same vice-versa, Just because enWP might have some articles...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Existence of tiger disputed on enWP. None has been caught; no reliable source to determine facts. If exists,...
Click to read more »Fram, an admin on EnPW was banned as an office action, on EnWp. People held different opinions on this, as is obvious from the EnWP community page about...
Click to read more »oversightship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it. Not successful per WP:SNOW clearly under the requirements. --Barras talk 20:03, 20 July 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »page ♮ 12:52, 7 March 2022 (UTC) Delete - Fails NFM, it has gone to AFD at enWP three times (keeps being re-created by sockpuppets), and has been declined...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Contested quick deletion; there is an article at EnWP, en:Chicka Chicka 1, 2, 3. Reason for quick deletion was that the article was...
Click to read more »same subject at en.wp The article was expanded due to it having been nominated for deletion by an editor who maybe did not follow WP:BEFORE, but when...
Click to read more »paper is probably important. See en:New Math. I do have to say though, without at least a simplified version of the EnWp article, keeping this is probably...
Click to read more »anyone commenting on this request to review the very well-researched AFD on enWP. Griff (talk) 14:24, 3 January 2025 (UTC) This request is due to close on...
Click to read more »needed if a note is given that the page is copied from EnWP. I say that because if the original EnWP article is kept, its history is kept as well. Normally...
Click to read more »idea if it saw theatrical release. Article is a little on the complex side (enWP copy/paste), and has many red-links. Article was created by an IP editor...
Click to read more »author created the article in multiple languages [1], got deleted in enWP [2] and deWP as well [3]. --Johannnes89 (talk) 09:30, 26 October 2021 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:UBXWP:UBX WP:USERBOXWP:USERBOX WP:UBWP:UB Userboxes (commonly abbreviated to UBX) are a simple way to display your interests on your userpage...
Click to read more »present page exists in the Tamil and EN WPs as Freemasons Lodge Building (Karachi). I suggest: rename it as in the EN WP and Wikidata item, removing all mention...
Click to read more »is an article en:Brahmana. Big question to ask the community is whether the article we have (up for deltion here) summarizes the EnWp article well enough...
Click to read more »Straight Edge PXK (talk · contribs) Ended: December 25 (per WP:SNOW -- Creol(talk) 13:38, 25 December 2008 (UTC)) I am the same Straight Edge PXK as on...
Click to read more »Actor BLP without any references and may not meet WP:NACTOR. Recently deleted at ENWP due to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pradeep_Rajput...
Click to read more »be considered notable (see en:WP:PERP point no. 2). Could it be notable in the future? Perhaps, but at the moment it is en:WP:TOOSOON. --IWI (talk) 17:21...
Click to read more »give a delete, no reason we deviate or re-discuss if concern is notablity) enwp discussion. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »insufficient reliable, independent coverage. He also doesn't appear to meet en:WP:NACADEMICS. --IWI (talk) 08:54, 17 January 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »Fails w:WP:NLIST, and there is no significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS...
Click to read more »actually notable figure. See remarks relating to the cited sources in the EnWp discussion of AfD linked by User:Zaxxon0, above. -- Deborahjay (talk) 15:37...
Click to read more »Reads like an ad. Is simpler than the EnWP article, but I haven't seen at all. Vaguely reminds me of the story of en:JPEG 2000? - Anyway, I think we can...
Click to read more »notification of meetings. No news hits, no book hits. I've nom'd it for deletion on enWP. fr33kman t - c 14:12, 26 February 2009 (UTC) Delete under QDA11 rule for...
Click to read more »reason: River crossing, not a community. Fails en:WP:GEOLAND and en:WP:GNG. Deleted on enwiki for this reason: en:Special:Redirect/logid/124952752. 136.152...
Click to read more »Never. THIS AINT ENWP! -- Da Punk '95 talk 06:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC) This concept is bound to bring out two angles. 1. Banned en:wp users claiming...
Click to read more »the narrow QD criteria, but I have no objection to a WP:SNOW delete. I would have PRODed this on enWP. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind...
Click to read more »history of page creations and deletions at EnWP, and someone should probably determine whether the creator here is a WP:SPA and/or sockpuppet. StevenJ81 (talk)...
Click to read more »did not win) is really notable enough for an article (the corresponding EnWP article just got quick deleted, for what that's worth), so I'm leaning towards...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Per en:WP:TOOSOON and en:WP:FUTURE. Cannot find independent reliable sources for this year...
Click to read more »made of listings/tables of productions. Article also available at EnWP, and one other WP (Malay?). Anyway, as it stands: Absolutely no sources, and nothing...
Click to read more »notable. The article was made by an SPA on Simple and an SPA on enWP. An IP commented on en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chase Tang saying "my client"...
Click to read more »as with the aborigines below: Festival exists, there is an article at EnWP(en:Vijayadashami), but what we have here is too little to justify keeping...
Click to read more »from EN WP selectively added back in. -- Deborahjay (talk) 15:38, 26 December 2020 (UTC) Comment: I have cut most of the parts copied from EnWP, as they...
Click to read more »search) and also the items in the list can be quantifiable. Meets en:WP:LISTN and is not en:WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Removing the merge tag.--Camouflaged Mirage (talk)...
Click to read more »Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet en:WP:NALBUMS. Auntof6 (talk) 17:50, 30 June 2013 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail en:WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG. Also see the precedent at en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khandaker Abdullah...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete The page is an obvious hoax. Nothing was found on Google or enWP. See this discussion about Bambifan101's socks. --Megan McCarty|talk 18:33...
Click to read more »significant coverage in sources. He is not presumed notable per NOLY or NATH (enWP notability guidelines specific to the Olympics and track sports). Note, he...
Click to read more »14 September 2022 (UTC) Delete - Not notable, doesn't have an article on enWP. NytharT.C 05:42, 14 September 2022 (UTC) Delete Yes, he is a DJ, and he...
Click to read more »the FinTech industry, that won a prize in 2016. Article was deleted from EnWP (en:Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wedogood). There's probably little material...
Click to read more »w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BolsaOObsequios. Non-notable, no article on en-wp. MER-C (talk) 13:15, 12 December 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »administration is mostly about trust. We are are much smaller project than EnWP, there are very few pages that are permanently protected. You can therefore...
Click to read more »quick deleted, but IP editor re-created with more complex copy-paste from EnWP in a pattern of disruptive editing. Gotanda (talk) 23:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wekeepwhatwekill 22:39, 18 September 2018 (UTC) Yes, SEWP is not ENWP but we borrow some of our policies from ENWP if we lack those here. Some of the Past members of...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Likely hoax article - no article on en.wp and the only Google hit is us... but I'm not sure enough to QD... Goblin...
Click to read more »those texts, another group has another set of texts). Unfortunately, the EnWP version this was takewn from has pretty much the same problems. What about...
Click to read more »Wikipedia page at this time, We get Some results on Google. also Mentioned on ENWP, but the article does not exist. Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 02:10, 25 February...
Click to read more »be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - The enWP AFD discussion is certainly interesting, but specific to this article, the...
Click to read more »because of their actions on ENWP, or other wikis. -- Da Punk '08 talk 21:16, 22 August 2008 (UTC) Would this involve a change to WP:Rules or do you intend...
Click to read more »The AFD at EN (en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adolf Uunona) says it better than I ever could, Fails en:WP:BLP1E, en:WP:NPOL and WP:GNG, –Davey2010Talk...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Georgan politician; we pretty much have the EnWp article. As there might be at least a claim to notability, I'd prefer to...
Click to read more »(most {not saying you} come here because they were blocked or banned on enWP) and create short articles on people not meeting any guidelines. We are a...
Click to read more »Delete per en:WP:1DAY - this has not yet been featured in reliable sources. --Belwine (talk) 13:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC) Delete also per en:WP:1DAY. Should've...
Click to read more »which he does not meet. That guideline also references enWP's guidelines, and he does NOT meet the enWP policy specifically for MMA fighters. I am more than...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Non-notable business person. Deleted twice on EnWP. Coverage is PR and promotional business "awards." Gotanda (talk) 22:00,...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails w:en:WP:NASTCRIT. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:35, 15 September 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »01:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC) Comment: I started a summary of the EnWp page en:Son of God, and labeled it with disambiguation. Might need some references...
Click to read more »talk:Rowde/Motorsports ITV for deletion for the reason: Each page violates WP:NOT. User seems, like on ENWP, to be not here to build an encyclopedia. See also Wikipedia:Requests...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: No evidence of any notability, Per en:WP:RSPSOURCES; Metro, Daily Express, The Mirror, Youtube, Twitter and Instagram...
Click to read more »Hammer-Sabrine (talk) 19:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Hammer, You may want to read en:WP:COI and en:WP:Paid editing, Your investment in this and other articles makes me...
Click to read more »Take a version from EnWP, copy it here; Edit summary Copied from EnWP (plus article-name if non-obvious/not the same) Add {{Enwp based}} template to talk...
Click to read more »Comment: : Also, these on English Wikipedia: en:WP:FREECOPY & en:WP:AIFAIL. This should be followed as said in WP:ENWIKI ― Dylan | ✉ | ✓ 19:34, 22 May 2023...
Click to read more »Wikipedia? Originally I contributed because of the many typos I saw on en.wp. I then moved into anti-vandalism and I've done lots of that. I originally...
Click to read more »based on No open proxies. WikiEn-l: "Anonymous proxies (was Re: Desysop Morwen)", Tim Starling 15 February 2004 WikiEn-l: "Anonymous proxies (was Re:...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable Kickboxer who fails en:WP:NKICK who I can't find anything to pass GNG. Djsasso (talk) 20:45, 20 August...
Click to read more »some titles, and the article we have is also not a simple copy-paste of EnWP. Deciding whether a beauty pageant winner (born 2007) is notable, is always...
Click to read more »Delete Fails wp:GNG and is a en:wp:PERMASTUB Plutus 💬 🎃 — Fortune favors the curious 13:05, 22 September 2025 (UTC) Delete WP:BIO1E, fails WP:GNG.🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN...
Click to read more »there a world of difference between the two! At EN, there is always drama. On pages like WT:RFA and WP:ANI, not a second goes by between dramatic arguments...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »on ENWP is pointless here. --Eptalon (talk) 11:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC) Canada for example has its own version of english as well. A hybrid of uk-en and...
Click to read more »interesting information (story) is lacking. There is an identical page of this at EnWP. My crystal ball is broken, but since we neither get a story, nor (obviously)...
Click to read more »languages they are, but they are the sort of en:WP:OVERCITE and refspam to make it seems notable but most are just en:WP:ROTM coverage. --Camouflaged Mirage (talk)...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Delete - Not notable, promotional, doesn't have an article on enWP, apparently made by the article subject. NytharT.C 05:45, 14 September 2022...
Click to read more »a different Indian actress with the same name with an extensive page on EnWP. How best to handle that? [1]? --Gotanda (talk) 22:28, 16 June 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »point to the point where he takes over control of an airline which can be en:WP:ROUTINE coverage as per when someone take over some position, there sure...
Click to read more »comparable -- many new articles in a very short time, cut-and-paste from ENWP and no response to repeated requests to slow down or stop, etc. See similar...
Click to read more »since the last AFD at ENWP (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Umesh_Kaushik). Possible spam, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umesh_Kaushik...
Click to read more »to be re-creation of the deleted article that was originally deleted at enWP AFD in 2018. Now, onto the article itself, the emerging award he won was...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »merging. Keep NYT obit seems pretty notable to me. Looking over at the EnWP article, a university building was named for her. Becoming a full professor...
Click to read more »23, 2022). It does not look like they have done anything else on enWP since then EN:Special:Contributions/Muhammad_Faisla_Ashraf PDLTalk to me!OMG, What...
Click to read more »had WP:FOLLOW as a guideline here. So we can follow enwp but not bnwp. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:52, 17 January 2021 (UTC) Delete. Follow En. Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »--Gotanda (talk) 00:19, 20 July 2023 (UTC) I have added information via EnWP and from reading the NYT article which clear describes her level of success...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Unsimplified, unattributed, copy and paste from EnWP Gotanda (talk) 02:55, 4 November 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »the reason: Unsimplified, unattributed, word-for-word copy and paste from EnWP. Gotanda (talk) 02:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »references be cited in context and on topic. Shortcuts WP:PSTSWP:PSTS WP:PRIMARYWP:PRIMARY WP:SECONDARYWP:SECONDARY Wikipedia articles should rely mainly...
Click to read more »a local version of how to not display images at WP:NOIMAGE. At the moment is mostly a copy of the enWP page. It needs to be simplified, and the links need...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: EnWp copy-paste of a moderately successful family film of 1995, vaguely inspired by en:Lottie and Lisa, a book bx Erich...
Click to read more »versions) of enWP. Above all you want them deleted to illustrate a WP:POINT. Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 18:45, 20 October 2011 (UTC) The doc of ENWP Based are...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:CORP. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NIX (company). --Ferien...
Click to read more »Comment: Also, these on English Wikipedia: en:WP:FREECOPY & en:WP:AIFAIL. This should be followed as said in WP:ENWIKI — Dylan | ✉ | ✓ 19:34, 22 May 2023...
Click to read more »significant coverage of his career per en:WP:NSPORT. The article was created in response to news of his death (en:WP:NOTNEWS). I agree he was a promising...
Click to read more »for the reason: Nothing here to show why subject is notable. No article on enWP, little other mention outside of IMDb. Rus793 (talk) 16:28, 13 October 2013...
Click to read more »as merging. Delete - Non-notable individual, doesn't have an article on enWP. NytharT.C 08:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC) This request is due to close on...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete - Not notable, doesn't have an article on enWP. NytharT.C 00:42, 13 August 2022 (UTC) Delete complete hoax. --DRC (User:TTP1233)...
Click to read more »evidence of notability, and evidently fails en:WP:PORNBIO. Was deleted on the English Wikipedia several years ago (en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milena...
Click to read more »it fit Simple WP. Therefore, quick deletion seems justified for articles, in particular long articles, that have been copied from enWP that are not simple...
Click to read more »articles that have never been created on EnWP. I might rephrase that last sentence to if an article doesn't exist on EnWP that doesn't automatically mean that...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Fails en:WP:NCOORP. Article has been deleted on enwiki as well. See en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NL-Pearl Barras...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG/w:en:WP:NSOFT. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ABrowse. --Ferien (talk |...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:NWEB, also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Answerbag (2nd nomination)...
Click to read more »or "delete", such as merging. Delete - This article was declined as an enWP draft for the same reason, there are no sources found that indicate this...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:AFDWP:AFD WP:RFDWP:RFD WP:XFDWP:XFD WP:VFDWP:VFD If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure. Then follow...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: 1:1 copy of an article from EnWp, where it is in Draft: space, so possibly work in progress. I am using the...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep Seems to probably meet en:WP:NPOL, depending on how it is read. "Politicians and judges who have held...
Click to read more »merging. Our current article may have shortcomings, but according to the EnWP article the concept was discussed as early as the 18th century; Note:I don't...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Convicted criminal, died recently, has article at EnWp FrWp. Rather than quick-deleting (Created by banned/blocked user), I'd prefer...
Click to read more »football. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:55, 26 September 2012 (UTC) Keep Meets en:WP:NSPORTS by playing in the J1 league. Remember notability is not fame. Playing...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Apparently non-notable. Already deleted on en en:WP:Articles for deletion/Jon Michail Garsh (talk) 20:26, 25 May 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails w:en:WP:NSOFT. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avant Browser. --Ferien (talk...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:SPORTBASIC. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koichi Hashigaito. --Ferien...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG/w:en:WP:NATHLETE. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugene Killoran. --Ferien...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails w:en:WP:NSCHOOL/WP:GNG. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makoons Play School. --Ferien...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: appears to fail w:en:WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrey Shishkin. --Ferien...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:NGAME. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Code of the Samurai. --Ferien...
Click to read more »has, and the religion of the person. There currently is an article at Enwp (en:Morality and religion), but I think we need to be very careful here: It...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »picture. The categories do not exist though so I’m thinking it came from enWp. PotsdamLamb (talk) 08:17, 9 May 2021 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »to 1659 on en) cant get along peacefully, agree and follow rules sends the message that that Simple consists of a bunch of amateurs with ENWP penis envy...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Quick delete - An exact copy of the enWP article. Griff (talk) 14:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC) Comment: A3'd by Eptalon...
Click to read more »my mind.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 20:33, 13 August 2017 (UTC) See en:WP:HISTORICAL and en:WP:HISPAGES. Pages that record history or historical processes should...
Click to read more »Beethoven. Also, Wijerd Jelckama which was a PGA was actually a copy-paste from enWP. We must take these things into consideration. We need to work on the rules...
Click to read more »discussiion though: There is an article at en:Human Rights Activists in Iran, and in other organizations. The EnWP arrticle mainly uses primary sources, though...
Click to read more »article we have has potential for expansion, but Shapiro has an article on EnWP (en:Ben Shapiro) and several other Wikipedias. My question is therefore: Is...
Click to read more »again reworded WP:COPY. I am not a law-person, but please note: To my knowledge, the stubs we have here (usually a few sentences from enwp intro, which...
Click to read more »doesn't creep into the article. I think it is notable and (enWP has it; we've used that as a WP:N test in the past. fr33kman talk 22:12, 30 May 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »idea to make a class of "better articles", much like Featured Articles on EnWP. We called them Very good articles, the criteria were these. With the time...
Click to read more »complex enough for QD and not complex enough for here, Respectfully en:WP:BEBOLD and en:WP:SOFIXIT applies, –Davey2010Talk 15:26, 5 August 2024 (UTC) Again...
Click to read more »appropriate behaviour. The only thing that comes close, that I can think of: EnWp has a number of articles on people who died in the protests against the Re-election...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep - Exists at en:One Thing Remains. en:WP:SOFIXIT. –Davey2010Talk 14:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC) Keep - It doesn't fail WP:GNG, and while this is...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails w:en:WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandrani Das. --Ferien...
Click to read more »CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:28, 24 June 2025 (UTC) This is what I mean by WP:NGR see en:WP:NGRS) and all the sources are listed Mrfixer2024 (talk) 15:23, 24 June...
Click to read more »comments at the talk page>? I wouldn't get away with it at enWP. When I read WP:OWN (en.wp's version, not this one), I thought this was what it was supposed...
Click to read more »a enWP version so it's obviously not breaking any policies.-- † CM16 19:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC) If we followed everything that happened on enWP, you'd...
Click to read more »under en:WP:RPRGM. This article has no reliable sources indicating its notability. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:48, 5 July 2014 (UTC) Delete per nom and en:Wikipedia:Long-term...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - Fails en:WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. No independent coverage; no roles of note. --IWI (talk) 13:24...
Click to read more »is also different on this version. This is apparently referenced in the en:wp article and should be added to the appropriate section. And then! rewrite...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete QDA3 applies here. This is just an unsimplified copy-paste from EnWP. The sources are not significant. --Gotanda (talk) 08:49, 30 December 2023...
Click to read more »A Listing of 19 movies made by Pixar; list is an unsimplified copy from enWp; the problem I see with this list though: high-maintenance item, which is...
Click to read more »be difficult, as there are few sources available; There is no article on enwp. Article in its current form does not show notabililty. Barras (talk) 17:40...
Click to read more »person, from Bangladesh. Won some awards which are hard to place. Articles in EnWP and Bangla. I personally don't see encycopedic notabilty; does someone else...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. I have replaced it with a stub based on EnWp. It is a large language group with probably around 300 million speakers....
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, fails w:en:WP:NCORP/WP:GNG. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KnowledgeFlow Cybersafety...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, fails w:en:WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ion Exchange (India) Ltd...
Click to read more »enwp article (en:Lehava) has over 40. Eptalon (talk) 19:05, 5 April 2026 (UTC) Keep, the organization is plainly notable, see all the sources on en:Lehava...
Click to read more »22 December 2024 (UTC) Delete - I agree with Darren that not having an enWP article is not a reason to delete the article, however not meeting the criteria...
Click to read more »It is quite clear that adequate sources do exist just by glancing at the EnWP page. No need to fill RfD with these. --Gotanda (talk) 22:19, 21 May 2023...
Click to read more »(UTC) StevenJ81, the article at En WP was deleted based on lack of notability, not for socking by banned users. See en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy...
Click to read more »1 August 2010 (UTC) Comment: The article is currently up for deletion on enwp too. -Barras (talk) 16:37, 30 July 2010 (UTC) Delete - Has not even released...
Click to read more »this SEWP article is on the first page of hits. The interwiki linked for EnWP is about the serial she won the award for. So I decided to do a regular RfD...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete per nom's well-presented reasons. The AFD at enWP also referenced NCLIMB, which Jyoti does not meet either. All the sources...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:NFILM. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Father's Diary. --Ferien...
Click to read more »Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EssentiallySports (2nd nomination)...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Fails all four points of en:WP:CREATIVE, as well as WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 13:17, 11 January 2021 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »Keep - Looks like Order of the Baobab is pretty significant. According to EnWP it isn't just handed out like a doorprize. --Gotanda (talk) 23:11, 19 February...
Click to read more »policy for redirects, I will be referencing points 1 & 8 from R#DELETE (enWP). In my opinion, this redirect will make it unreasonably difficult for users...
Click to read more »to change these if it is deemed needed. --NigelJ talk EN 21:51, 1 April 2007 (UTC) As per the enWP guidelines, the section should always be called External...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to fail en:WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 14:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »using mostly the information presented here as well as random glances at en:wp and the reference given. --Creol(talk) 18:10, 25 January 2013 (UTC) Speedy...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Questionable notability; has article on EnWp and what looks like hebrew wikipedia; still not convinced that the subject...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fully protected rd at ENWP per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pawandeep_Rajan_(2nd_nomination)...
Click to read more »use of it but I'm not sure. and just because enWP doesn't have it doesn't mean we shouldn't...we're not en.-- † CR90 22:23, 3 January 2010 (UTC) If you'd...
Click to read more »the entire suit is a more suitable topic. Also, as evident, there is an En.wp article and it seems to have more references then text.. so that's two issues...
Click to read more »22:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC) Delete fails WP:GNG with very little coverage, and also fails all points at en:WP:NAUTHOR. Not notable. --IWI (talk) 22:21...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails w:en:WP:NCORP. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AeronautX Luftfahrtschule. --Ferien...
Click to read more »appear in the enWP or faWP lists for the seat he supposedly holds. Without this, he doesn't meet NPOL. For additional context, the article on faWP was nominated...
Click to read more »Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails w:en:WP:NSOFT and WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG, note this is not the same person as en:Aleksei Antonov. --Ferien (talk) 18:30, 3 January 2024...
Click to read more »ago by a Bengali en:WP:LTA name "Parvej Husen Talukder" (see their SPI page bn:উইকিপিডিয়া:সকপাপেট তদন্ত/মোঃ পারভেজ হুসেন তালুকদার & en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet...
Click to read more »BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and en:WP:NMUSICIAN. Page about a music artist who is not notable. BRP ever 11:44...
Click to read more »for the reason: No significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG and en:WP:NORG. BRP ever 14:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »I don't see the harm in FUN being a redirect to humour?, At EN en:WP:FUN redirects to en:Wikipedia:Department of Fun which we don't have ..... Obvious...
Click to read more »http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Murad_Gümen. Regards Valentino Rivoli Of note, there is an OTRS request on the ENWP AfD discussion...
Click to read more »deletion under any criteria. The title of the page should be correct (per WP:MOS). The content of the page should be wikified to a certain extent. This...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Fails w:en:WP:NSPORT. Played one match in the Olympics, but did not win a medal. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:NCORP. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ContractZen. --Ferien (talk...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Non notable porn actress, Deleted at EN due to notability, Fails en:WP:PORNBIO and GNG –Davey2010Talk 22:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »Tanbiruzzaman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails en:WP:NORG and WP:GNG. 🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN (💬) 07:12, 25 September 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nog WP:SIGCOV. Fails en:WP:COMPANY too. Barras talk 20:45, 16 June 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »request Hiàn has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and en:WP:NARTIST. Hiàn 01:51, 30 April 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »youtube, so it does have some notability. It also has more details than the enwp article. It gets quite a few visits as well [1] and is in our top 5000 most...
Click to read more »BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails en:WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Claims with no reliable sources, and a quick look lead to no...
Click to read more »or "delete", such as merging. Delete - the discussion that took place on en WP is useful and I agree with the consensus there. Umpires are not inherently...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:TWINKWP:TWINK WP:TWWP:TW Twinkle is a set of JavaScript functions that gives autoconfirmed/confirmed users many extra options and tools to...
Click to read more »reason: QD was declined, but this is a word-for-word copy and paste from EnWP without any simplification or attribution. Gotanda (talk) 11:54, 7 December...
Click to read more »Declined QD. Subject of article does not appear to meet NMUSIC. Soft deleted at enWP and then declined in draft space. Griff (talk) 03:22, 25 January 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »for the reason: Upcoming Hindi TV series; what we have is a copy of the EnWP article. Article also has a high number of red links. Other than a problem...
Click to read more »for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:BIO1E. Only references relate to age, no notability shown beyond that. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for...
Click to read more »appropriate school authority for a redirect). Fails notability. See en:WP:NSCHOOL and en:WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Primary and junior high (middle) schools tend to...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Keep and change content in the article to match en:WP's disambiguation page :). Cheers, Razorflame 02:28, 7 August 2008 (UTC) Withdrawn...
Click to read more »Shahram could possibly be notable, but the article does not indicate so. The enWP AFD discussion is worthy of reading, but I have to judge what is presented...
Click to read more »reason: Let's do an RfD, we are looking at a convicted criminal, with an EnWP page. There are quite a few references. Article was nominated for QD (created...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - enWP certainly doesn't think a list is necessary nor does this programme lend...
Click to read more »10:28, 4 December 2011 (UTC) Agree, the article shouldn't have to exist at enwp for it to be VGA here. The two projects are separate. Yottie =talk= 16:35...
Click to read more »Yeah, so this Wikipedia needs a Typo Team like the enWP. The main goal of the enWP Typo Team (enTT) is, "[being] dedicated to making Wikipedia look more...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Not notable organization. Fails WP:GNG and en:WP:NORG. BRP ever 14:19, 27 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail en:WP:SINGER and WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 00:14, 3 April 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Agree with Fr33k, Delete. If someone really wants a list, go to enWP. We can't simplify a list. Griffinofwales (talk) 03:34, 18 February 2010...
Click to read more »27 October 2021 (UTC) @Blissyu2 Fixed by me too on that page. But seems enwp doesn't take SOLDIER as an exclusionary guidelines and discourages from using...
Click to read more »You can make an emailnotice? {{Sonia|talk|en}} 07:44, 15 May 2010 (UTC) Yep. For example, my email page on ENWP has one: here. :) -Avicennasis @ 17:32,...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG/w:en:WP:NSPORT. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:18, 19 October 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG/w:en:WP:NSPORT. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:22, 5 November 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:SPORTCRIT. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:21, 11 January 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG/w:en:WP:NSPORT. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:24, 5 November 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG/w:en:WP:NSPORT. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:25, 5 November 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: appears to fail WP:GNG/w:en:WP:NPROF. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:26, 1 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »we need to find the value of A." Shortcuts MOS:ENGVARMOS:ENGVAR WP:ENGVARWP:ENGVAR WP:LANGVARWP:LANGVAR Remember that millions of people have learned...
Click to read more »no verifable sources given, although it can easily be rectified by adding enwp sources and had been done. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:57, 19 January 2021...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: An article about a stage actor that IMO fails en:WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Barely any sources in the article, and I couldn't find much...
Click to read more »aspect of the Warriors (book series) universe. There is a mirror article on enWP. I would be happy to help clean this up if it is kept. PrincessofLlyr talk...
Click to read more »standard, it is nowhere near at present. I think the article is en:WP:TOOSOON and it fails en:WP:GNG. Thanks. Jack (talk) 10:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails w:en:WP:NCHARACTER/WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 17:30, 2 December 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable per WP:GNG and en:WP:NEVENT Barras talk 10:48, 4 January 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »you see enwp - Cyrillic (Transnistria only) was mentioned) as well as Turkish_language (our version doesn't but enwp have it per https://en.wikipedia...
Click to read more »This article appears to describe a battle within the Şahkulu rebellion (enWP) but has no sources and the battle isn't notable enough on its own to have...
Click to read more »them, global rollbackers and stewards also have access to rollback. Shortcut WP:ROLLBACKUSEWP:ROLLBACKUSE Rollback is a tool normally only used to reverse...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:MOVIEWP:MOVIE All articles in Simple English Wikipedia must be about notable subjects. This page shows how notability is used for movies. Notability...
Click to read more »(Template:Ain communes) and thought I ought to attribute it to enwp with the template we have (Template:Enwp based). However, it seems to be for articles only (well...
Click to read more »afd on enwp, etc. SwirlBoy39 23:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Delete - NN, no en.wiki version. 2x AFD's on en.wiki. No reliable sources. Closing as WP:SNOW...
Click to read more »sequel, either in IMDB or in a search. Even if real, it apparently fails en:WP:NOTFILM. Auntof6 (talk) 21:45, 21 March 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »discussion. Jimmy Wales. Keynote speech, Wikimania, August 2006. Jimmy Wales. "WikiEN-l Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information", May 16...
Click to read more »the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG, also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC Paris. --Ferien...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: appears to fail w:en:WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:51, 2 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG/w:en:WP:NFILM, only being kind in kicking it to RfD as an A4 that has stood...
Click to read more »"WP:TEA" redirects here. If you are looking for the Teahouse, please note that Wikipedia:Simple talk serves this purpose. Note that drinking tea is only...
Click to read more »we get basically unformatted text; note also the deletion discussion at EnWP. In short: all they found about it are not reliable sources; nothing similar...
Click to read more »Arabic, Persian and other languages. If wanted, we could 'translate' the EnWP article properly, pointing out similarirties and diferences. The article...
Click to read more »to EN, you will be overwhelmed by the shockingly high numbers of all kinds of noticeboards. Yes, that was one of the reasons I like least about WP too...
Click to read more »is a person doing the job he was educated for. So, despite him having an EnWp article, I propose we get rid of our article. Thoughts? Eptalon (talk) 18:10...
Click to read more »Support - I still have some concerns over the recent one year ArbCom ban on enWP, but I think I've heard enough to support. I would still work on your commitment...
Click to read more »Local Pages: Check Page • Requests • Typos Shortcuts WP:AWBWP:AWB WP:AUTOWBWP:AUTOWB If you would like to request permission to use AutoWikiBrowser on...
Click to read more »Unable to find sufficent in depth, reliable sources to deem this notable per en:WP:NBUILDING. --IWI (talk) 08:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »to quote the deletion nomination reason on en.wiki cause it says it perfectly. Fails en:WP:TVSERIES and WP:GNG, no significant (better to say none) coverage...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG (and also the failed w:en:WP:MALL.) --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:44, 1 July 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »is no significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The rationale applies...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Not notable, there's primary source only. Fails WP:GNG and en:WP:NSOFTWARE. 🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN (💬) 06:17, 27 September 2025 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »Non-notable. But I must say we should never delete an article because enWP did (WP:NOTEN).-- † CR90 08:30, 11 January 2010 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete fails en:WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 10:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete appears to fail en:WP:AUTHOR and WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 22:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »notability: The article exists in 28 other Wikipedias. As to the references: The EnWP article has some references, which could probably be copied. As to the case:...
Click to read more »areas. This includes the over 50 accurate WP:QD requests he has done, his help in reverting vandalism, the WP:VIP reports he has done (I admit not many...
Click to read more »clueful editor, so I won't propose this on enWP just yet. But if I do, how should I go about it? {{Sonia|talk|en}} 00:21, 13 May 2010 (UTC) I think your...
Click to read more »--Gotanda (talk) 07:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC) And, there is always. EnWP https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Segun_Ogunsanya Gotanda (talk) 07:39, 18 February...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to pass w:en:WP:NBUILDING. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:03, 10 August 2026 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to pass w:en:WP:NBUILDING. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:04, 10 August 2026 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:SPORTBASIC. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:31, 14 July 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG/w:en:WP:NSOFT. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 13:44, 8 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:SPORTBASIC. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:42, 14 July 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:SPORTBASIC. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:41, 14 July 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:SPORTBASIC. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:40, 14 July 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »depratment/uniz is called Inter-Services Intelligence, there likely is an article at EnWP. If we need an article, we need itr under the full name of the organization/unit/government...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC) Delete - While this article does have an enWP version, the nominator's reasons are strong and backed up by our notability...
Click to read more »further ado. Article was created about half a year ago, and also exist in EnWp. Opinions? Eptalon (talk) 18:23, 23 March 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »Several socks of Jackjack were discovered. Many of these were named after En:wp users. Other accounts which have been used for good editing were also a...
Click to read more »that it has helped English/American people understand complex articles on enwp. But initially it wasn't really intended for native speakers. Yottie =talk=...
Click to read more »really want the change (as you could be anyone), so post under your name on enWP with something like "I am 118.92" or "I, Ala Liefting, am requesting usurption...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail w:en:WP:NSCHOOL/WP:GNG --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:31, 8 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete en:WP:POVFORK of en:Genocide of Poles by Nazi Germany. Polygnotus (talk) 17:07, 8 July...
Click to read more »source. I have started World religions (which is a partial translation of the EnWp article). One option would be a redirect, to get rid of the unattributed...
Click to read more »17:22, 12 March 2008 (UTC) Alison made the "bringing the fight" comment on ENWP. By replying here and taking up so much space already on this board you are...
Click to read more »such as merging. Quick Keep Article is marked as WP:HUMOR and to not take it seriously. See also en:WP:HUMOR. The creator of the article is also purposely...
Click to read more »subpage Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails en:WP:NPOL. Barras talk 18:54, 15 February 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails w:en:WP:NASTRO. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 06:24, 16 February 2026 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail w:en:WP:SPORTBASIC. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 15:05, 19 October 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails w:en:WP:NASTRO. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:43, 12 March 2026 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails w:en:WP:NASTRO. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:30, 2 December 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails w:en:WP:NSCHOOL/WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 15:36, 1 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable. Might be a case of en:WP:TOOEARLY. Barras talk 19:09, 9 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG/w:en:WP:NFILM. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 19:00, 1 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails w:en:WP:NSCHOOL/WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:26, 8 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG/w:en:WP:NORG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:35, 1 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails w:en:WP:NMOVIE. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:42, 2 December 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails w:en:WP:NSOFT. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 13:56, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails w:en:WP:NASTRO. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 17:04, 12 March 2026 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »it is not considered to be a reliable source. For more information, see en:WP:FRINGE on the English Wikipedia. {{citation needed}} — adds: [source?] Wikipedia:Citing...
Click to read more »10, and compare to en:Indianapolis Motor Speedway, reference link number 10. It also appears that the other cite template on enwp use the same printonly...
Click to read more »posted there... But how likely is it we get people who know about Islam from EnWP? --Eptalon (talk) 16:33, 15 July 2008 (UTC) There must be a few editors with...
Click to read more »there is a claim to notability, none of the sources I have found on enWP or urWP meet our RS requirement, and without that, this article does not show...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Non notable boxer, Fails en:WP:NBOX and GNG, Was deleted at EN too (en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rolly Lambert Fogoum)...
Click to read more »then why don't you tell that to enWP.-- † ChristianMan16 16:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC) Why should we "tell that to enWP"? This is not English Wikipedia....
Click to read more »gwickwire (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions) Already have rollback on en.wp , would like to become more active here, and would like to go ahead and...
Click to read more »pointless) list at ENWP, Authors of the Bible is a very similar one History of ... may be a rather lengthy article which will not add much to this WP. Should we...
Click to read more »article is not a clear WP:CRYSTAL violation, because there is a reasonable amount of coverage in external sources, based on the EN version of the article...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Delete. w:WP:SOFTDELETE MathXplore (talk) 10:28, 29 April 2025 (UTC) Siempre en las Nubes (edit · talk · history · links...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail w:en:WP:NSCHOOL/WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:29, 8 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: appears to fail w:en:WP:NSCHOOL/WP:GNG --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:30, 8 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »js', 'My monobook.js'); // ONE addPortletLink ('p-navigation', '/wiki/WP:AN', 'WP:AN', 'ani', 'Go to the Admin Noticeboard'); var el = document...
Click to read more »in a long time... I concur with AE. It's about time your community ban on en-wiki was lifted. --Dylan620 (Sign this plz) 23:57, 23 January 2009 (UTC) I...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to pass w:en:WP:NJOURNALS or WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 15:16, 1 July 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG and w:en:WP:NGAME. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:10, 5 July 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »Pmlineditor Talk 17:35, 8 August 2009 (UTC) I have already used you once at enWP. No problems with trust. Griffinofwales (talk) 17:38, 8 August 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable galaxy, fails w:en:WP:NASTRO. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:46, 6 March 2026 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG/w:en:WP:NARTIST. --Ferien (talk) 10:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:NSOFT, has existed on this wiki since 2007. --Ferien (talk | join...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, Fails en:WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG –Davey2010Talk 16:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »Doesn't meet GNG nor the specific track & field criteria spelled out at en:WP:NTRACK. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:11, 26 June 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: This is not notable because it fails en:WP:NCORP. The only sources I can find with significant coverage are paid sources...
Click to read more »significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. Not an international player, and took part in only ten first-class matches, so fails WP:GNG. Jack (talk) 18:40,...
Click to read more »Thanks, RyanCross (talk) 01:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC) Hello, one of the reaosns enWP has is "independent research" (or similar, don't quote me on the exact title)...
Click to read more »· delete) EhJJTALK has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: en:WP:Neologism. Non notable, unverifiable new word. Please discuss this deletion...
Click to read more »July 2011 (UTC) Pages can be copied from the enWP and simplified with an attribution note (Template:Enwp based) on the talk page. Albacore (talk · changes)...
Click to read more »basis, I believe the subject fails WP:NACTOR. With respect to the AI company, the subject very clearly fails en:WP:NBUSINESSPERSON. Hiàn 02:04, 30 April...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail w:en:WP:NASTRO. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WOH S281. --Ferien (talk | join...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail w:en:WP:NSCHOOL/WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:36, 8 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »hundreds of communities that enWP has become. All I'm asking is that people become more civil and not insult each other on seWP; we have lost a lot of good...
Click to read more »23:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC) Comment: - EnWp has an article about the surrounding conversvation area, en:Mill Creek (conservation area), they decided...
Click to read more »Juliancolton is also an administrator elsewhere in the WMF universe such as at enWP, simpleWB, simpleWQ (also a crat there), commons, enwikinews, flaggedrevs_labswikimedia...
Click to read more »that you are doing a fine job. You edit articles, participate in WP:RFDs, request WP:QDs, revert vandalism, and you are civil in discussions. All I can...
Click to read more »reason: The article doesn't state why the siege is notable at all. Fails en:WP:NEVENT. Barras talk 21:31, 10 January 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be a notable event per en:WP:NEVENT. Barras talk 10:47, 4 January 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: This is not notable because it fails en:WP:NCORP. I can't find any sources that are significant, independent of the...
Click to read more »(UTC) Can someone import the enWP dance stub, please? It's {{dance-stub}}. Macdonald-ross (talk) 19:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC) See WP:SSP please and get it approved...
Click to read more »March 2009 (UTC) Delete as en:WP:Neologism EhJJTALK 23:17, 18 March 2009 (UTC) Delete non-notable...and by the way, teh en article in the interwiki is...
Click to read more »interested in do not even have an article here. This is why I, and many other enwp editors find it difficult to edit around here. I only work on DYK here, which...
Click to read more »Turkish and Russian Wikipedias. What we have is more or less a 1:1 copy of the EnWp article. Article comes with 20 References, that are either in Russian or...
Click to read more »reason: No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT. The only source is a statistical database, and the content breaches en:WP:NOTSTATS. The list is one of several...
Click to read more »Delete per nom - Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails en:WP:NACTOR & WP:GNG. –Davey2010Talk 21:29, 11 July 2024 (UTC) Delete as per above...
Click to read more »knowledge of when it should be performed. Brian is also a trainee SPI clerk on enWP and this shows that he has been determined to have the skills needed in this...
Click to read more »reason: Possible hoax. Can't find reliable sources. Might be a case of en:WP:TOOSOON. Barras talk 13:52, 9 June 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »not certain what it is you seek, but are you looking for something like {{enwp based}}? It looks like this: This page or parts of it were created based...
Click to read more »the exact revision (of the en article copied), and could therefore link to a special version of the edit history of EnWP article. Would this then fulfill...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG/w:en:WP:NFILM --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:40, 2 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »or "delete", such as merging. Delete Not a very significant murder, see en:WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Lights and freedom (talk) 23:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »deletion/Requests/2024/Krishna Bhaiya). Renominating it now, fails WP:GNG/w:en:WP:NFILM. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 09:54, 1 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and w:en:WP:SPORTBASIC. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:48, 14 July 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail w:en:WP:NTEAM and WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:32, 6 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »appear to pass Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Creative people (w:en:WP:NJOURNALIST) or WP:GNG. The only coverage appears to be about his resignation after...
Click to read more »Unsuccessful Request for Adminship This request was closed by a Non Admin per WP:Not Now. The filer is encouraged to continue to contribute and try again when...
Click to read more »In consensus with discussion on AN/I at enWP, just wanted to note that a user from enWP who is indef blocked for sockpuppetry is active here as Highspeedrailguy (talk ·...
Click to read more »07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Delete - Fails en:WP:CREATIVE even after considering the (questionable) sources on EN. Chenzw Talk 12:57, 1 February 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »monobook skin on both enWP and simple. Griffinofwales (talk) 00:19, 13 July 2010 (UTC) Search runs here on alpha just as it does for me on en. -DJSasso (talk)...
Click to read more »actively editing Wikipedia since November of last year. I started out on en, but a while ago I realized how much more good I could do here. I'm in the...
Click to read more »incorporate Wikipedia: and WP: as one heading so if someone wrote WP to simplify, they wouldn't get lost. This is what en.wikipedia does. MathCool10 04:15...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, Fails en:WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG –Davey2010Talk 19:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails w:en:WP:NSONG --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:27, 23 July 2025 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »(UTC) I say Keep it, cause eventually it will be used and I think WP:PAPER from enWP would apply nicely here.-- † ChristianMan16 05:16, 7 June 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(UTC) What I basically wanted to say above: As it is now, WP:OWN is more or less a copy of EnWP. I believe few people think it should not apply here, as...
Click to read more »subpage Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails w:en:WP:NGAME. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:14, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »Notable? Truthful? Referenced? I have no clue about it, and nothing on EN WP. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't...
Click to read more »apply as w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinesh Kunwar Patel - mainly notable for the Shalu robot, but this is just 1 event, w:en:WP:BLP1E. --Ferien...
Click to read more »blocked/bannerd user). Rather than QD I would prefer a discussion. There are EnWP and ItWp article. so, keep, delete? Eptalon (talk) 09:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »reason: Article about a race championship 4 years later, no official sources. en:WP:TOOSOON. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:14, 14 June 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »reason: Article about a race championship 5 years later, no official sources. en:WP:TOOSOON. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:14, 14 June 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »pure attempt at POV-pushing, brought here to circumvent its deletion at EnWP. Might even support a quick deletion. Phaedriel - 17:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »