Redirect to:
an entry that is only a dictionary-style definition (sometimes called a dicdef) does not belong here. If you are interested in working on a wiki-dictionary...
Click to read more »Delete. Dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:23, 7 February 2014 (UTC) Delete: dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:04, 7 February 2014 (UTC) Delete – A dicdef much better...
Click to read more »as merging. Delete as fails WP:DICDEF. –Davey2010Talk 16:22, 2 March 2025 (UTC) Delete Little more than a WP:DICDEF.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions)...
Click to read more »Delete. It's a dicdef. Actually, I think our dicdef is better than the page! Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:18, 7 April 2013 (UTC) Definitely a dicdef; I also don't...
Click to read more »it is a dicdef, and it's already in wikt. Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:38, 8 May 2014 (UTC) Delete Dicdef. We should have a QD category for dicdef....
Click to read more »Dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:11, 3 January 2014 (UTC) Delete: Dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 03:04, 4 January 2014 (UTC) Delete: Dicdef....
Click to read more »as this can't be considerded a dicdef either as it is very small article with barely 10 words. Delete as it is a dicdef --Reception123/Receptie123 (talk)...
Click to read more »we certainly do not need as an article. Dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:41, 9 May 2015 (UTC) Delete as a dicdef. I agree, it is a rare word. User:Rus793...
Click to read more »close request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef: Wikipedia is not a dictionary User:Rus793 (talk) 13:42, 10 May 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Delete as a dicdef. Pretty tough to make an article out of this. User:Rus793 (talk) 00:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC) Question. It's a dicdef here, and really...
Click to read more »31 January 2014 (UTC) Delete - A dicdef already at sewikt. Rus793 (talk) 20:17, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Delete as dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:05, 2...
Click to read more »Delete as dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC) Delete as a dicdef. User:Rus793 (talk) 21:06, 25 May 2015 (UTC) Delete as dicdef. Eurodyne...
Click to read more »Delete as dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Delete as a dicdef. User:Rus793 (talk) 22:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Delete as dicdef. StevenJ81...
Click to read more »Delete as dicdef. It even reads like a dicdef ("Sing-along as an adjective means..."). --Auntof6 (talk) 22:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Delete as dicdef. StevenJ81...
Click to read more »Category for Dicdef-s? -Pending(tell me I screwed up and where) 19:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC) My take on that is that 1) what is or isn't a dicdef can be hard...
Click to read more »as a dicdef. User:Rus793 (talk) 23:38, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Delete as dicdef --GeorgeBarnick (talk) 23:43, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Delete. It's a dicdef, all right...
Click to read more »close request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: a dicdef partially copied from Simple Wiktionary Rus793 (talk) 12:28, 9 October 2014...
Click to read more »2014 (UTC) Delete. Definite dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:18, 6 December 2014 (UTC) Delete and move to Wikt - Obvious dicdef. George Edward C – Talk – Contributions...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. per dicdef fr33kman 01:12, 19 April 2012 (UTC) Pwn (edit · talk · history · links ·...
Click to read more »or "delete", such as merging. Delete as dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:05, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Delete as a dicdef. Redirect to List of Knots per StevenJ81...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete. Obviously a dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:58, 9 September 2013 (UTC) Delete. Dicdef, has an entry in Simple English Wiktionary...
Click to read more »close request Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef, already in Simple English Wiktionary. Also, article titles should usually...
Click to read more »I thought it obvious that it was a dicdef and now it is not. It changed from being a dicdef to not being a dicdef. It was a dictionary definition. He...
Click to read more »close request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef; obscure term User:Rus793 (talk) 22:48, 4 March 2015 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »or "delete", such as merging. Delete as dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:55, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Delete Dicdef. Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 12:44...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete as dicdef --GeorgeBarnick (talk) 04:50, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Delete as a dicdef. User:Rus793 (talk) 23:26, 12 May 2015...
Click to read more »deletion is that the article is a dicdef. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so we don't keep dicdef articles. If this is a dicdef, we don't keep it no matter what...
Click to read more »a dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:11, 26 October 2016 (UTC) Delete not notability Apipo1907 (talk) 11:21, 27 October 2016 (UTC) Delete as a dicdef; does...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete WP:DICDEF.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:22, 21 June 2024 (UTC) Delete as just a DICDEF. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:44...
Click to read more »June 2024 (UTC) WP:DICDEF Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 01:22, 22 June 2024 (UTC) Delete definitely qualifies for deletion under WP:DICDEF. — Preceding unsigned...
Click to read more »deletion was to Delete. Too little encyclopedic content for Wikipedia (bad dicdef). In its currect form also unsuitable for SEWikt--Eptalon (talk) 19:27,...
Click to read more »close request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: a dicdef. User:Rus793 (talk) 12:07, 18 May 2015 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete. Dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:28, 11 December 2014 (UTC) Delete. A dicdef. Rus793 (talk) Delete Dicdef. Eurodyne (talk) 01:59, 13...
Click to read more »(talk) 08:25, 10 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. Dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:32, 14 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. A dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 17:33, 14 June 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »also think so but really I hate keeping dicdef. I had done some expansion which makes it no longer a dicdef. And I added a reference, so the nom rationale...
Click to read more »close request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A dicdef Rus793 (talk) 13:26, 5 July 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »or "delete", such as merging. Delete as dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:53, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Delete Dicdef. Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 12:44...
Click to read more »to Delete. What we had was a pure dicdef, that's what Wiktionary us for. If re-created, should ne more than a dicdef..--Eptalon (talk) 09:36, 9 January...
Click to read more »its potential. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:03, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Delete as dicdef. We keep articles based on what's in them, not on what they might have in...
Click to read more »request StevenJ81 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef. Additionally, there is no context for the article except for a link under...
Click to read more »make it a disambiguation page, but I think it's really just a series of dicdefs and examples. Auntof6 (talk) 09:44, 19 September 2013 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »close request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: a Dicdef; Wiktionary already has an entry for positive User:Rus793 (talk) 22:22,...
Click to read more »close request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef; also WP is not a slang or idiom guide User:Rus793 (talk) 15:57, 23 February...
Click to read more »merging. Delete as a dicdef. I don't see much article potential. User:Rus793 (talk) 21:55, 24 May 2015 (UTC) Delete. It is a dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk)...
Click to read more »or "delete", such as merging. Delete as dicdef. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:14, 18 January 2017 (UTC) Delete. A dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 16:48, 21 January 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »close request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef. Wikipedia is not a dictionary User:Rus793 (talk) 00:08, 6 September 2015...
Click to read more »· delete) Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: dicdef; has Simple Wiktionary entry Auntof6 (talk) 02:31, 31 October 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »· delete) Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: dicdef, already in Simple English Wiktionary Auntof6 (talk) 07:25, 31 January 2014...
Click to read more »(talk) 02:30, 7 January 2014 (UTC) Delete. Dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:54, 7 January 2014 (UTC) Delete: Dicdef. Enfcer (talk) 04:24, 14 January 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »17:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC) While it was determined years ago that after a dicdef has been moved to Simple Wiktionary, it could be deleted, as written, it...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. It's a dicdef and, not for the first time, wikt does a better job. Macdonald-ross (talk)...
Click to read more »close request Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef, suitable for wiktionary; I don't think we can give much encyclopedic content...
Click to read more »a stub than a dicdef. Made some minor improvements. Rus793 (talk) 16:18, 6 July 2014 (UTC) Keep. Agree that this is more than a dicdef and with improvements...
Click to read more »· delete) Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef. Has an entry in Simple English Wiktionary. Auntof6 (talk) 22:08, 25 September...
Click to read more »delete) Oregonian2012 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: dicdef Oregonian2012 (talk) 11:37, 11 October 2013 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »real life. Jim Michael (talk) 23:31, 29 May 2014 (UTC) As it is, this is a dicdef and therefore a delete. If someone later on decides to write a proper article...
Click to read more »or "delete", such as merging. Delete. As a dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 11:29, 28 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. Dicdef and unencylopedic. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:48...
Click to read more »13:27, 23 March 2016 (UTC) Delete per nom as dicdef. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:22, 24 March 2016 (UTC) Delete as dicdef with nothing much to recommend it. Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete: obvious dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:26, 29 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. A dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 11:00, 29 June 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete. Very much a dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC) Delete. A dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 20:56, 18 July 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »· delete) Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: dicdef, already in Simple English Wiktionary Auntof6 (talk) 07:24, 31 January 2014...
Click to read more »close request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A dicdef, suggest it be moved to Wiktionary Rus793 (talk) 16:02, 6 June 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »close request Caliburn has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef, should be moved to SimpleWikt. --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth...
Click to read more »Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Basically a dicdef, but I don't think it even belongs in Wiktionary. Auntof6 (talk) 03:56,...
Click to read more »merging. Delete as dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:31, 25 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. An unimproved stub that's been here too long. A dicdef. Rus793 (talk) This...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete as dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:13, 16 July 2014 (UTC) Delete. As a dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 19:35, 18 July 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »or "delete", such as merging. Delete. As a dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 11:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC) Delete as dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:31, 30 June 2014...
Click to read more »as merging. Delete as dicdef, and what's more, it's wrong... Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:34, 25 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. A dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 12:56, 28...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete – Aside from being just a dicdef, the definition isn't really true. Around here at least, an avenue is just...
Click to read more »delete) Oregonian2012 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: dicdef, has wikt entry Oregonian2012 (talk) 08:20, 16 October 2013 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »is accused of being a dicdef, not a stub. For me, it's borderline, so... Keep. There's a tiny bit more than I would call a dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:47...
Click to read more »or "delete", such as merging. Delete as dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:57, 23 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. A dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 11:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete as dicdef. Also not quite correct. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:35, 25 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. A dicdef. Also a stub that's been here...
Click to read more »Delete. More a dicdef than a stub. Regardless, a six year old stub with no improvements. Rus793 (talk) 17:43, 6 July 2014 (UTC) Delete. Dicdef with almost...
Click to read more »or "delete", such as merging. Delete as dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:10, 24 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. A dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 11:38, 25 June 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete as dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. As it is, a dicdef. If returned to a redirect (see history)...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete as dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:42, 13 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. As a dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 21:02, 14 June 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »merging. Delete as dicdef. This one is just a restatement of the words. Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:16, 16 July 2014 (UTC) Delete. As a dicdef. Rus793 (talk)...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete as dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:09, 24 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. Little more than a dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 11:36, 25 June...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete as dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:21, 12 June 2014 (UTC) Delete - As a dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 12:54, 14 June 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »· delete) Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: a dicdef. Suggest moving to seWikt Rus793 (talk) 14:57, 28 September 2013 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »wiktionary as wikt:animal animation. Obvious dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:34, 5 June 2014 (UTC) Delete - As a dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 13:22, 5 June 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Delete Dicdef. unsourced, likely OR, vague info (someone on YouTube.. Someone?) It is possible to be made into something more than a dicdef, but that...
Click to read more »for deletion was to Keep. Important subject, I have extended it beyond a dicdef, needs simplifying though--Eptalon (talk) 07:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC) Workplace...
Click to read more »Oregonian2012 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: As is, it's a dicdef better off at wikt where it has been entered. Oregonian2012 (talk) 18:54...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete as dicdef. There are dozens of these botanical terms, many of which our articles do...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. Doubtful if it's even a dicdef (not in Concise OED). If anything it's a cant journalistic or web invention...
Click to read more »but as it is, this is just a dicdef. Delete unless improved. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:54, 23 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. A dicdef that’s had plenty of time to...
Click to read more »· delete) Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: a dicdef Rus793 (talk) 05:12, 29 September 2013 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »· delete) Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A dicdef that does not meet notability criteria. Rus793 (talk) 13:39, 17 October...
Click to read more »StevenJ81 below.Delete, not because it's in Wiktionary, but because it's a dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC) --Auntof6 (talk) 01:07, 28...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete per nom. It's a dicdef and I don't see anyway it could be made more encyclopedic.- FusionSub (Talk...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. A dicdef. User:Rus793 (talk) 14:20, 18 October 2015 (UTC) Move to Simple Wiktionary...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Dicdef; for an ebcyclopedia there's very little to talk about.--Eptalon (talk)...
Click to read more »or "delete", such as merging. Delete as dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:30, 12 June 2014 (UTC) Delete A dicdef, but it has over 250 pages that it links...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article is a dicdef. I added it to Simple English Wiktionary. Auntof6 (talk) 08:44, 30 August...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Can be deleted as a dicdef, in its current state. If kept, we should get to something similar to en:Elohim...
Click to read more »delete) Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: basic dicdef, already in Simple English Wiktionary Auntof6 (talk) 07:01, 11 July 2012...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Dicdef, no reason we cannot use the material already present at Angle --Eptalon...
Click to read more »request StevenJ81 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef. Should be fleshed out or deleted. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:47, 3 August 2017...
Click to read more »fixed however) but support moving. Hiàn (talk) 01:45, 17 January 2019 (UTC) Dicdef. Move or delete. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:29, 17 January 2019 (UTC) Transwiki...
Click to read more »dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:17, 7 February 2014 (UTC) Keep per Auntof6. Thanks Osiris. TCN7JM 16:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC) Keep: no longer a dicdef....
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. Very clear dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC) Delete: Just a dictionary...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete. Well, it is admittedly OR, and also a dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:56, 9 September 2013 (UTC) Transwiki - not sure...
Click to read more »to Keep. I could give you a whole essay on why this quite clearly fails DICDEF and why Asilvering is incorrect but in the end I'd only be wasting my breath...
Click to read more »close request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A dicdef; also WP is not a slang or idiom guide User:Rus793 (talk) 15:58, 23 February...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete as a dicdef. User:Rus793 (talk) 22:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Delete as a dicdef. But I'll probably play with it some on...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete as dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:33, 12 June 2014 (UTC) Keep - Just because a page...
Click to read more »close request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A dicdef. It was redirected to Physical attractiveness but an objection was raised...
Click to read more »logs · delete) Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef, notability, no sources. Rus793 (talk) 00:20, 18 September 2013 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »close request Fr33kman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef, no valid QD reason to delete fr33kman 00:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »that an editor added some content with the edit summary "Now more than dicdef". However, the information added was the etymology (origin) of the word...
Click to read more »· delete) Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: dicdef; title is adjective rather than noun; has Simple Wiktionary entry Auntof6...
Click to read more »between a stub and a dicdef. Stubs are acceptable, dicdefs are not. At the time of this nomination (and of your comment), it was a dicdef, just defining the...
Click to read more »· delete) Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: dicdef; has Simple Wiktionary entry Auntof6 (talk) 02:30, 31 October 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »--Auntof6 (talk) 20:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC) Delete, I think: It's a stub and a dicdef, so by rights should be deleted. But oddly, someone put {{Wiktionary}} on...
Click to read more »nothing wrong with having the dicdef at the top of a disambiguation page as long as the rest is there—especially if the dicdef represents the primary meaning...
Click to read more »2014 (UTC) Keep. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:34, 13 July 2014 (UTC) Delete. A dicdef. Keep per Eptalon's improvements. Rus793 (talk) 17:16, 6 July 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »whole process is not served by a dictionary definition. Also: Giving a dicdef is no grounds for deletion, in this case....--Eptalon (talk) 20:22, 25 June...
Click to read more »what is written is certainly a dicdef. Fylbecatulous talk 00:04, 23 April 2015 (UTC) Delete:. Yes, we do get many dicdefs on subjects which might make articles...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: First of all this looks like a dicdef to me. In its current form, the article is pretty unusable. So, delete?...
Click to read more »or "delete", such as merging. Delete. As a dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 14:15, 8 July 2014 (UTC) Delete: dicdef of a rare word. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:37...
Click to read more »all right, but more than a dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC) Keep - this is a stub article, not a dicdef. It should not be up for...
Click to read more »no more than simply define the title, then it's a dicdef, not an article. We could add the dicdef to the list item, and delete this page. That would...
Click to read more »delete it for now. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:52, 29 May 2014 (UTC) Delete. Another dicdef. Both terms are already explained in Menu, where á la carte is contrasted...
Click to read more »delete) Oregonian2012 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: dicdef Oregonian2012 (talk) 21:44, 7 October 2013 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 23:10, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Delete: Dicdef. Goblin 02:26, 6 September 2013 (UTC) I ♥ TCN7JM! Keep. Not sure how it...
Click to read more »seWikt and the article at enWiki shows there is more to it than just a dicdef. Keep as improved. Rus793 (talk) 12:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. In effect...
Click to read more »EnWP article. --Gotanda (talk) 23:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Delete Pure dicdef in current state. No prejudice in keeping if an encyclopaedia article is...
Click to read more »· delete) Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef. Has an entry in Simple English Wiktionary. Auntof6 (talk) 22:08, 25 September...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete -- basically a dicdef. Maybe could be merged somewhere, but I have no idea where that would be...
Click to read more »and delete here - dicdef. Hiàn (talk) 17:31, 25 July 2018 (UTC) Comment. Slow down here. As it stands now, the page is just a dicdef. But if you look at...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: OR, no sources, not even a dicdef Rus793 (talk) 19:04, 19 September 2013 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »Keep not a DICDEF at this point and could definetly be improved. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 00:11, 15 August 2024 (UTC) Keep not WP:DICDEF --Cactus🌵 spiky...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. A dicdef. Doubtful it will be accepted at Wiktionary either. Rus793 (talk) 15:56...
Click to read more »close request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A dicdef; unsourced and orphaned term User:Rus793 (talk) 16:26, 16 April 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »request StevenJ81 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef. Should be fleshed out or deleted. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:46, 3 August 2017...
Click to read more »there. This is currently a one-sentence dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:10, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Delete as dicdef. It can certainly go into Wiktionary. But...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Article has been created on SEWIKT, and is dicdef Enfcer (talk) 02:49, 4 February 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Was a pure dicdef, and got a new life at SEWikt, at [Inquest].--Eptalon (talk) 15:15, 27 June...
Click to read more »encyclopedic tone. It's clearly more than a dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:15, 14 July 2015 (UTC) Delete. It's not a dicdef, I agree, and I don't mind at least the...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Quick deleted per the dicdef/wikt Rfd resolution. Disambig page moved to this pages location. --Creol(talk)...
Click to read more »request StevenJ81 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef, and in fact wikt:treachery already exists. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:17, 3 August...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete - Definately a dicdef, no encyclopedic content. George Edward C – Talk – Contributions 17:50,...
Click to read more »· delete) Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A dicdef; does not state why it's notable Rus793 (talk) 20:32, 7 October 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »delete) Oregonian2012 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: dicdef Oregonian2012 (talk) 09:10, 20 October 2013 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »parts to this "disambiguation page". Neither has any links. One part is a dicdef. The other is about a restaurant and doesn't indicate notability. Auntof6...
Click to read more »delete) Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: basic dicdef, already in Simple English Wiktionary Auntof6 (talk) 07:01, 11 July 2012...
Click to read more »for the reason: No notability shown for this term/word. It's basically a dicdef here. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:39, 15 April 2026 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »Yottie has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The page is a dicdef for a word from another language. Cannot see how this is notable. Yottie...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. This was a one-sentence dicdef, not was Wikipeia is for...--Eptalon (talk) 15:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC) Ishizuki...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. A one-sentence dicdef, little to expand on...--Eptalon (talk) 10:12, 7 April 2024 (UTC) Michigander...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Dicdef now in Simple English Wiktionary. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. A dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 13:27, 14 December 2014 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. A dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 13:42, 14 December 2014 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »Keep. Per snow. The article has been heavily improved to distinguish itself from a dicdef to an encyclopedic entry.Synergy 16:54, 16 June 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete WP:DICDEF.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 12:57, 20 October 2024 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »· delete) Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef. Has an entry in Simple English Wiktionary. Auntof6 (talk) 22:07, 25 September...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. A dicdef. Unimproved and unsourced for several years. Keep as improved. Rus793 (talk)...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep. More than a dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 11:56, 1 July 2014 (UTC) Keep. Very thin: there's more to...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, also dicdef Auntof6 (talk) 03:46, 5 December 2013 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »close request Chenzw has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef, contents have been moved to simple.wikt. Chenzw Talk 11:02, 1 May 2020...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete as dicdef. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:05, 27 April 2015 (UTC) Now ok to keep. StevenJ81 (talk)...
Click to read more »delete) Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: basic dicdef, already in Simple English Wiktionary Auntof6 (talk) 07:00, 11 July 2012...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be more than a DICDEF here. More develpoment would be needed with sources to show depth beyond...
Click to read more »the parts that are about the person and not the word/concept, it's just a dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:27, 28 June 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. Not notable; at best a dicdef. Refers to a numbering system used by the w:Portable Antiquities Scheme...
Click to read more »Delete per nomination. Lugia2453 (talk) 23:20, 6 October 2013 (UTC) Delete. dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:18, 10 October 2013 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The 1st sentence is a dicdef. The following sentence can, if they have not been, included in the article...
Click to read more »dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 18:02, 7 November 2013 (UTC) Delete. Dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:54, 8 November 2013 (UTC) Delete It's already...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. Very rare word, a dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:39, 27 September 2013 (UTC) Delete - Delete as...
Click to read more »be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete as a dicdef; not because it also exists on Wiktionary. User:Rus793 (talk) 22:07, 9 May...
Click to read more »the part about hiring wedding photographers makes it a little more than a dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:45, 3 December 2015 (UTC) Keep - per Auntof6. Chenzw Talk ...
Click to read more »StevenJ81 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: For now a dicdef. But–other bridge types have own articles, some substantial. Probably can...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. As the person who tagged it with {{dicdef}}, I'm in favor of deleting. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:13, 3 February 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Delete. Already in Wiktionary; what we had was a dicdef, without much potential for expansion. Such articles are better in Wiktionary...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Supposedly a dab page, but really just some dicdefs with examples of how to use the word in sentences. We have no actual "piece"...
Click to read more »Oregonian2012 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Page is a dicdef Oregonian2012 (talk) 01:07, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. As a dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 19:32, 18 July 2014 (UTC) This request is due to close on...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Redirect to Exploration.Delete as dicdef (along with the redirect). This is another one that deserves more info,...
Click to read more »changes based on the enwiki article and added sources. It's more than a dicdef now. User:Rus793 (talk) 21:34, 9 May 2015 (UTC) Keep: this is now an expanded...
Click to read more »April 2015 (UTC) Keep. I think there's enough to keep it from being just a dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. As a dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 11:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC) Delete per nom. --Auntof6 (talk)...
Click to read more »· delete) Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef that's in Wiktionary Auntof6 (talk) 05:59, 30 April 2013 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. A dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 16:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC) Delete. Yes, obviously. Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »short dicdef isn't the most useful. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:13, 27 December 2020 (UTC) Not really a dicdef as generally when we say dicdef we mean...
Click to read more »Enfcer has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article is a dicdef, and already has a listing on Simple Wiktionary Enfcer (talk) 17:19, 12...
Click to read more »looking at what the article could be, the article is a little more than a dicdef, and is ok for a stub. --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 07:52...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep. An article stub and not a dicdef. This is a valuable subject that, unfortunately, hasn't been developed up...
Click to read more »improvements). Rus793 (talk) 12:11, 28 June 2014 (UTC) Keep - this is not a dicdef, it is a stub.--Peterdownunder (talk) 13:23, 28 June 2014 (UTC) Keep per...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is not much more than a dicdef, and has a page on Wiktionary. Violates Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. I reckon we should Redirect to Microphone; as a dicdef perhaps transwiki to wikt:computer microphone, although I defer to the Wiktionary...
Click to read more »"Throng" exists. --Beefball Talk 07:18, 5 December 2013 (UTC) Delete as dicdef, and add to wikt. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:48, 5 December 2013 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »· delete) Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef. Also a neologism, which we have a precedent of not including here. Auntof6...
Click to read more »June 2014 (UTC) Keep. While the article currently isn't much more than a dicdef, it's a recent article that has potential. Rus793 (talk) 17:13, 23 June...
Click to read more »article. In this form, the article lacks notablity and very close to a dicdef. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:04, 1 March 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete as dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:32, 12 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. Per nom. Rus793...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. One-sentence dicdef, wasn't expanded while the RfD was running, so gets deleted. Note: not opposed...
Click to read more »close request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A dicdef. A complex transwiki article that keeps repeating the definition and lists...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. Classic dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:43, 12 December 2012 (UTC) Delete. Wikipedia is...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. A dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 11:21, 28 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. Wiktionary does the job...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete. Speedily: doubt if it would even qualify as a dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:02, 3 February 2013 (UTC) Comment if it didn't...
Click to read more »point is that at the time, the entry was a dicdef; that's what Wiktionary is for. Extend to be more than a dicdef, and keeping will be no issue. Note, it...
Click to read more »2009 at 5:36 pm, although it may be closed more quickly due to WP:SNOW. {{dicdef}} —MC8 (b · t) 02:24, Wednesday August 26 2009 (UTC) Keep - it should be...
Click to read more »request FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:DICDEF and I don't see any use for a page called Voluntary in an encyclopedia....
Click to read more »(talk) 14:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. This one scarcely makes it as a dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:56, 18 June 2014 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. A dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 11:35, 28 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. Once again, wikt does a...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:58, 17 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. Perfect example of what the word 'dicdef' means. Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:03, 18 June 2014 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »for this one. --Eptalon (talk) 10:39, 14 December 2014 (UTC) Delete. As a dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 13:49, 14 December 2014 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »delete Cmarsch (talk) 21:27, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:DICDEF. –Davey2010Talk 19:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC) Delete per others.Me Da Wikipedian...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete To me just looks like a dicdef with pictures. evolution.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 16:42,...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. DeleteYes, it's a dicdef and not a particularly good one. fr33kman 19:40, 16 October 2023 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »· delete) Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A dicdef and also erroneous. Rus793 (talk) 19:15, 16 October 2013 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »to Wikitonary. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 23:12, 16 August 2021 (UTC) Obvious dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:12, 19 August 2021 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is not much more than a dicdef, and has been for several years. Violates Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary"...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep. There's more than just a dicdef here. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Keep as per Auntof6. StevenJ81...
Click to read more »Still needs some references and categories, but is already more than a dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:21, 3 July 2022 (UTC) I withdraw this nomination upon...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete as dicdef. Could be moved to wikt. StevenJ81 (talk) 02:51, 22 November 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »a dictionary article. A2 04:54, 17 July 2014 (UTC) Delete. As-is it's a dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 19:25, 18 July 2014 (UTC) This request is due to close on...
Click to read more »· delete) Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef that's in Wiktionary Auntof6 (talk) 05:59, 30 April 2013 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »seWikt. Rus793 (talk) 12:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. Another very clear dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:06, 18 June 2014 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. A dicdef. Redirect works just as well. Rus793 (talk) 12:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC) Redirect...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete WP:DICDEF.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 13:20, 12 October 2024 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. A dicdef, plus it is an adjective, which is usually not a good article title. --Auntof6...
Click to read more »Durjan Singh Jadon (talk) 00:59, 10 May 2025 (UTC) Keep Definitely not a dicdef, seems to be a decently long and thoughtful article. Not a wikt move candidate...
Click to read more »2014 (UTC) Did you mean "delete", Mac? This kind of name wouldn't be a dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:56, 27 June 2014 (UTC). Oh, yes! Macdonald-ross (talk)...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. Dicdef, and such a rare word. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:45, 23 June 2014 (UTC) Oh...
Click to read more »close request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A dicdef for an obscure term User:Rus793 (talk) 13:23, 27 June 2016 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. Effectively a dicdef; job better done by wikt. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:57, 7 February 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete. The only part worth keeping is just a dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:06, 17 June 2012 (UTC) Delete per above and per others...
Click to read more »the lead from EN and simplified it however it still felt like it failed DICDEF so gave up, I want to say Keep but my version would still result in it sounding...
Click to read more »off topic (the article covers one definition of the term in a relatively dicdef aspect but not the more encyclopedic definition of the word) or a useless...
Click to read more »Category:Move to Wiktionary is full of these. Above article should be tagged with {{dicdef}} and moved to Wiktionary. Beefball Talk 18:50, 20 December 2011 (UTC) It...
Click to read more »reason: A1 declined which I think rightly so. However the content is a dicdef and the title isn't correct, the closest I can find is en:Nawabs of Bengal...
Click to read more »13 May 2015 (UTC) Keep, I guess. Not really a lot here but more than a dicdef. User:Rus793 (talk) 18:40, 13 May 2015 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »October 2013 (UTC) Keep. September's additions have made this more than a dicdef. (Some sources would still be good, though.) --Auntof6 (talk) 07:12, 7 October...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. Worse than a dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:26, 12 June 2014 (UTC) Delete per above. Chenzw Talk ...
Click to read more »(talk • contribs) 11:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Redirect to child abuse per WP:DICDEF, Obvious really. –Davey2010Talk 17:24, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Redirect In...
Click to read more »close request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A dicdef. Mentioned as such in w:Taqlid Rus793 (talk) 16:55, 26 February 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete. Even if it's real, the article is just a dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC) Delete from Wikipedia and move...
Click to read more »delete. Kansan (talk) 20:31, 28 November 2011 (UTC) Delete - A non-notable dicdef. Delete. -Orashmatash- 21:20, 28 November 2011 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »content. So, dear community: do you see a life of this article beyond a dicdef? Eptalon (talk) 17:44, 23 January 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »07:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Keep because more info has been added. Delete as dicdef. Another one that deserves more info, but we don't decide based on what...
Click to read more »FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Declined qd, WP:DICDEF - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:36, 31 January 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability, a dicdef, only link is to a disambiguation page. Not an article. Rus793 (talk) 13:56...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Offers a dicdef at best; I don't know if we have an article about a story published in episodes...
Click to read more »appropriate) to Simple Wiktionary. Agree that as the article is now, it is a dicdef that doesn't belong here. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 05:00, 6...
Click to read more »moved it to Wiktionary, see wikt:dismemberment. Wikipedia is no good for dicdefs, and there's little we can write about.--Eptalon (talk) 08:24, 19 June...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete. The only part worth saving is just a dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:05, 11 June 2012 (UTC) Delete - as per nom. --Peterdownunder...
Click to read more »the added info. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:17, 4 June 2014 (UTC) Delete - As a dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 13:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC) This request is due to close on...
Click to read more »Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 04:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC) Keep. It's more than a dicdef, and what's there has potential for expansion. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:06, 11...
Click to read more »request StevenJ81 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef, and not really even (fully) correct. StevenJ81 (talk) 19:34, 26 October...
Click to read more »Camouflaged Mirage has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: dicdef, doesn't seem nonsense or etc, enwp has a page on en:Greco-Roman mysteries...
Click to read more »consensus IMO. IWI (chat) 01:24, 13 March 2019 (UTC) CommentNow it's a dicdef plus very little, so unless expansion it's sensible to redirect back but...
Click to read more »Delete: Not notable. Lugia2453 (talk) 01:18, 12 August 2013 (UTC) Delete:. Dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:21, 12 August 2013 (UTC) Delete:. Per everyone...
Click to read more »redirect it is not an alternative title for Communism, otherwise it's a dicdef. Rus793 (talk) 00:37, 18 December 2014 (UTC) Delete. Not an appropriate...
Click to read more »see no decent formatting; if there's enough material to be more than a dicdef is debatable.In the case of description this may be the true: In 1905, Bertrand...
Click to read more »it is. But it’s not on the Basic or Basic English picture wordlist. So a dicdef much better suited for wikt. Rus793 (talk) 12:52, 14 December 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia has an article. Lights and freedom (talk) 04:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC) Dicdefs we don't want, but articles we do want. It's up to the author to read this...
Click to read more »term which almost certainly came from the book. Both sources treat it as a dicdef. One web dictionary picked it up but as a copyvio of the book. Rus793 (talk)...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. At least more than a dicdef of what 2070 is, but seems a little en:WP:CRYSTAL. Per enwp, redirect temporarily...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Comment This isn't a dicdef. It is a small description of the subject but this isn't what is known as...
Click to read more »with the original nom, that the original amounted to little more then a dicdef, but now is an acceptable article. Enfcer (talk) 04:13, 14 January 2014...
Click to read more »borderline on whether to qd, but decided to go with rfd. This is basically a dicdef, which should be deleted. Auntof6 (talk) 11:30, 15 October 2018 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is not much more than a dicdef, pretty much copies what's on Wiktionary. Violates Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary"...
Click to read more »required to be useful. This one has just enough info to be more than a dicdef. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:26, 13 September 2012 (UTC) Keep Same reason as user:Auntof6...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. The article was a dicdef. I did not create a redirect to supermarket, because in my view, a grocer...
Click to read more »be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. Two dicdefs which are already covered in articles. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:53, 20...
Click to read more »delete) Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: basic dicdef, already in Simple English Wiktionary Auntof6 (talk) 06:57, 11 July 2012...
Click to read more »be noted that, as currently written, the article is little more than a dicdef, although this could be fixed. Etamni | ✉ | ✓ 23:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete per nom, its a dicdef, not an article.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:15, 18 March...
Click to read more »never heard the term "sibling family", though, and this is a pretty useless dicdef. I've created child-headed family instead. Osiris (talk) 03:23, 31 October...
Click to read more »Non notable culture, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails DICDEF and GNG –Davey2010Talk 18:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »Fusion - Certainly a notable subject and article is more than just a WP:DICDEF so there's hope. Just needs expanding. –Davey2010Talk 19:31, 18 March 2024...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Since when are we discussing dicdefs? Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) Fixed the definition...
Click to read more »Archer7 - talk 17:35, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Added note: we also have template:Dicdef which is similar in function (but not with the pretty colors and a whole...
Click to read more »As for redirecting to the main IRA article, that article is currently a dicdef (and I just tagged it as such). --Auntof6 (talk) 19:36, 9 December 2015...
Click to read more »delete) Oregonian2012 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: dicdef Oregonian2012 (talk) 11:17, 11 October 2013 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »often forget is that WP:DICDEF doesn't just mean a sentence describing a concept, that in fact is allowed by dicdef. What Dicdef disallows is an entry that...
Click to read more »numbers are wastes of time. LIAM ! 13:41, 22 July 2007 (UTC) You can add a {{dicdef}} template to an article that you think is a dictionary definition and not...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC) It's a disambiguation page, not a dicdef. -Orashmatash- 16:41, 10 December 2011 (UTC) Keep. Per Orashmatash. Goblin...
Click to read more »Delete this one. Come up with something about cremation if it is more than a dicdef. --Eptalon 16:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC) Delete Marcin Suwalczan [our talk]...
Click to read more »past the basics. I think we all need to keep in mind the spirit of what WP:Dicdef is getting at. There is a subtle (but important) difference between a very...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:21, 28 February 2009 (UTC) I found {{Move to Wiktionary}} (aka {{dicdef}}). Seems there's a good number of articles listed at Category:Move to Wiktionary...
Click to read more »--Peterdownunder (talk) 10:43, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Yes, we have one here: {{dicdef}} Chenzw Talk 10:48, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Hi all. I have searched for...
Click to read more »the river! I just turned it into an encyclopaedic article so it's not a dicdef anymore! hehe, just kidding. I agree with Angela. Optim 08:27, 26 Jan 2004...
Click to read more »analysis or synthesis" even if it means citing every sentence at least one. "Dicdefs." I have responded to this concern on my talk page at: User talk:Msannakoval#Satisfaction...
Click to read more »ring. -- Eptalon 15:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC) Transwiki and then delete, dicdef.--TBCΦtalk? 02:37, 7 December 2006 (UTC) Closed as delete.--TBCΦtalk? 16:40...
Click to read more »have a Wikipedia article, then it has to meet requirements (notable, not a dicdef, etc.). --Auntof6 (talk) 08:57, 4 May 2015 (UTC) Okay, the reason I commented...
Click to read more »have articles, if that's what you mean. I wouldn't want to see a lot of dicdef entries. Not all the terms would make appropriate encyclopedia articles...
Click to read more »commander= 08:26, 8 May 2009 (UTC) Suggestions for replacement pages for dicdefs include making them a disambig page or {{softredirect}}ing to the corresponding...
Click to read more »correct (clarify this with Razorflame or somesuch), stubs that are close to dicdefs should automagically go to wikt:. —MC8 (b · t) 22:49, Thursday August 27...
Click to read more »created soon. I'm not fond of creating stubs that are only barely more than dicdefs, and don't think people necessarily have to create subsidiary articles...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Delete dicdef, per nom.--Werdan7T @ 04:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC) Result: Quick deleted as per the RfD outcome on all dicdef articles. SEWP definition...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete I really don't understand why we can't just quick delete dicdefs??It's dumb. fr33kman 17:01, 26 October 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:BEFORE "C...
Click to read more »Dreyderswinson 16:21, 7 April 2007 (UTC) Move to Wiktionary - I have added a {{dicdef}} tag, which nominates the page for moval to the wiktionary. --rimshottalk...
Click to read more »billion, trillion) I was uncertain of it not being capable of being purely dicdef and not encyclopedic. There are still several numbers left which need to...
Click to read more »in the long run (although overall it is more a wiktionary concept as a dicdef and realy should be either linked there or a redirect to a wiki-glossary...
Click to read more »1.15.56 is running a bot through the wiki, putting up pages with short dicdefs. The question is, do we mind this? Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:50, 9 June...
Click to read more »the first sentence to work with. One sentence which is a poorly written dicdef. Every sourse provided (in the article and in this RfD are dictionary references...
Click to read more »dictionary definition. Quite literally. People like to play loose when stating dicdef as a reason. But none of these articles even before they were expanded were...
Click to read more »Ottawahitech (talk) 01:13, 8 August 2019 (UTC) It was deleted for being a dicdef (dictionary definition). If someone wants to write a more fleshed-out article...
Click to read more »"Invariant polynomial" (content was: '{{delete}}-- Vandalism/silliness/dicdef to make a point, see [[:en:User:Haydes]].----An invariant polynomial is...
Click to read more »making a stub: the article has to be more than dicdef/wikipedia:Dicdef; Possible sources for avoiding dicdef: triumfalisme [5] - Det Norske Akademis ordbok...
Click to read more »for examples. As Simple English Wiktionary admin I can import simplewiki dicdefs. Having advanced permissions here can allow me to work on the opposite...
Click to read more »contribs) 23:23, 26 December 2024 (UTC) Similarly anything tagged with {{dicdef}} Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 23:25, 26 December 2024 (UTC) @Lee Vilenski:...
Click to read more »If in the end you write an article that turns out to be more than a mere dicdef, go ahead. You could also give examples. For example showing an image Vermeer...
Click to read more »