Redirect to:
Shortcuts WP:RFUWP:RFU WP:DRVWP:DRV If you think a review of a deletion discussion is needed, please list it here and say why. Users can then comment...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:RFUWP:RFU WP:DRVWP:DRV If you think a review of a deletion discussion is needed, please list it here and say why. Users can then comment...
Click to read more »need to. If you disagree with this decision, please start a review at WP:DRV instead of discussing it here. --IWI (talk) 18:26, 23 August 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross as G7. Further discussion about the deletion can be had at DRV. --Griff (talk) 18:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC) Loro Horta (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »quick-delelted, for laack of notabililty. This deletion was contested at WP:DRV, so doing an RfD instead. Open to comments... Eptalon (talk) 12:02, 31 May...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete with no prejudice to a unilateral undeletion at DRV or AN if an expert or otherwise experienced party wants to simplify it. Keep...
Click to read more »previous categorization system, a broader discussion should occur at ST or DRV. Chenzw Talk 05:14, 22 January 2022 (UTC) Category:Women linguists (edit...
Click to read more »RFD and your QD of G4 tagging is wrong. I had raised this issue out at WP:DRV. @PotsdamLamb:. There is clearly a clean version that can be kept for PICH...
Click to read more »reason: This was originally QD'd as a duplicate, subsequently disputed at DRV. In lieu of the discussion there, I have restored this and am sending this...
Click to read more »projects. If you believe deletion is unfair please feel free to take this to WP:DRV. Thanks BRP ever 00:38, 16 March 2020 (UTC) Dj Parisa (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »under QD A4, this was contested (restored), re-deleted, and re-contested at DRV. It was found that the original A4 deletion was likely to be invalid; sending...
Click to read more »ANYBIO/GNG. Recommend SALTing and sending any future discussion through DRV. Griff (talk) 02:25, 28 December 2024 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »Griffinofwales has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: As a result of a DRV, this article has been restored for further discussion at RFD. The initial...
Click to read more »article" which is disruptive and POINTy behaviour. Creator should've gone to DRV like every other editor. –Davey2010Talk 16:43, 18 June 2025 (UTC) But you...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: This article was undeleted as a result of a DRV discussion. The outcome of the discussion decided that a RFD would be appropriate...
Click to read more »SEPTActaMTA8235 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Consensus at DRV to re-open. --—SEPTActaMTA8235— (t — c — l) 15:28, 28 April 2011 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »clear enough for a NAC in this case. I think at RFD will be easier than DRV. This was initially nominated by SHB2000 at Wikipedia:Requests for...
Click to read more »--Yottie =talk= 10:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC) I would say to Djsasso that both DRV discussions led to the respective deletions overturned by an admin, so are...
Click to read more »now. When article is considered "good enough", appeal the deletion through DRV. Do not re-create in article space without consensus. Griff (talk) 00:51...
Click to read more »above, DRV is of course an option for any redirect deleted under this rule. I expect all members of the community to be wise about the use of the DRV discussions...
Click to read more »DRV rather than RFD. The previous discussion have a consensus to use Movies rather than Films. The previous discussion can be seen as a RFD. For DRV,...
Click to read more »Sure. Lauryn (u • t • c) 02:19, 7 March 2010 (UTC) Resolved. Subject of DRV is watching, so we shall keep it open, well, unless the closing administrator...
Click to read more »the article was illustrated, and referenced. So go ahead and start up a DRV. Good luck.. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC) I restored...
Click to read more »editing, this is better to be individually handled as to prevent future DRV and etc. This bundling might give a clear consensus on the general state...
Click to read more »of the suitablity of redirect (where I see it here), but well DRV isn't for this. DRV is to evaluate whether the closer acted correctly, so the RFD should...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: None notable. Was deleted under QD but restored per DRV discussion fr33kman 04:12, 27 March 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »DelRev. Jim Michael (talk) 11:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC) @Jim Michael: At WP:DRV. There is an edit filter at English Wikipedia preventing additions of "Brandon...
Click to read more »Blissyu2 (talk) 09:04, 25 November 2021 (UTC) I mean that bringing these to DRV is a correct move if you think the close isn't correct, but I won't say they...
Click to read more »he described it as a "political decision", which is when I brought it to DRV. There are also numerous other examples that I can provide if needed. Upon...
Click to read more »first moves in this project) without WP:DRV. These suggest that both users have the same intent (possible WP:DRV and WP:3RR evasion). Please also note that...
Click to read more »statement. As for the questions: 1) I plan to be active in places like RfD and DRV as well as dealing with vandals if I catch them in the act :). Most of my...
Click to read more »'something else' part above, I do know that a DRV is mainly used 'to review the RFD'. In fact, I started this DRV according to Auntof6's odd reply, that is...
Click to read more »with the deleting administrator (en:User:JIP) or to deletion review en:WP:DRV). Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 15:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC) Restore: I would...
Click to read more »by EARTHSCIENCETEACH (talk • contribs) This user is the creator of this DRV proposal. Vermont (talk) 16:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC) We are a small Wikipedia...
Click to read more »express my support. This bot will make archiving our WP:PGA, WP:PVGA, WP:DRV and our permission requests (RB and Patroller) much easier. I am hoping to...
Click to read more »19:03, 15 January 2025 (UTC) Hi admins, when you close discussions around WP:DRV and WP:PGA, you can simply mark the section as resolved using {{section resolved|-~~~~}}...
Click to read more »deletion/Requests/2025/Devan Leos (2nd nomination) and that was overturned at DRV[1] primarily because the RFD was closed as SOFTDELETE, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk...
Click to read more »Endorse deletion per dave Raayaan9911 16:29, 18 January 2025 (UTC) Hi! So DRV is here to condone if a deletion is a suitable response to the discussion...
Click to read more »User:محمد محسن 90 created the Millat Mohammed article here, declaring in a WP:DRV request that they do have a COI on this topic.[22] They have been blocked...
Click to read more »being 25. Thanks,--BRP ever 12:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC) I feel like WP:DRV really needs a rework in general. Maybe make it more similar to WP:RfD in...
Click to read more »baseless accusations of me being an LTA, according to Bbb23 on the same DRV on English Wikipedia, the IPs involved in editing by User:LiliaMiller2002/User:Angelmunoz50...
Click to read more »AfD Includes AfD (Articles for deletion), VfD (Votes for deletion), and DRV (Deletion review) discussions Deleted and later redone At the time, this...
Click to read more »Pape2023 (talk) 14:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC) This should be taken up at WP:DRV not here. :) fr33kman 18:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC) Possible case of Advertising...
Click to read more »should be discussed with user:Macdonald-ross, please feel free to use WP:DRV. MathXplore (talk) 05:08, 11 August 2024 (UTC) Sent talkback (Special:Diff/9694803)...
Click to read more »(talk) 11:57, 4 January 2025 (UTC) Hello. Please submit a request on WP:DRV. By the way, the notability of a person must be proven here, on simplewiki...
Click to read more »2 August 2025 (UTC) If you want to request undeletion please do it at WP:DRV fr33kman 01:05, 9 August 2025 (UTC) If you have time, please contribute and...
Click to read more »