This page is a redirect. The following one or more categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
cannot talk about how you think Nintendo is fun or boring. Dictionary. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and an article that is made of just the meaning of a...
Click to read more »"What Wikipedia is not". "Wikipedia is not a dictionary" means that an entry that is only a dictionary-style definition (sometimes called a dicdef) does...
Click to read more »English well, or need a clearer explanation of the meaning of a word. This dictionary will have all English words, but uses a small group of words to define...
Click to read more »species Wikiversity Learning resources Wikivoyage Travel guide Wiktionary Dictionary and thesaurus Use these templates when linking between Wikimedia projects...
Click to read more »· delete) Aaqib has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary, only bots have edited this page. Aaqib 20:15, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »delete) Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary definition, already in Simple Wiktionary Auntof6 (talk) 21:30, 6 November...
Click to read more »what "existing means for a word"), this is an encyclopedia, and not a dictionary. We have little means to provide an encyclopedic definition for it--Eptalon...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Delete as being a dictionary definition, and not a word used in English--Peterdownunder (talk) 23:27...
Click to read more »you might not know that the grammar is also different sometimes. British Spelling standards Dave VE7CNV's Truly Canadian Dictionary of Canadian Spelling...
Click to read more »should stand for. After many rounds of ideas and flicking through cheap dictionaries, "Talking about Simple English Really Is Not Grueling" was born....
Click to read more »dictionary entry. We try to maintain a policy that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so please resist the urge to make such pages even more dictionary-like...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Per Wikipedia:DICTIONARY article seems to be a dictionary definition of the word. Bobherry Talk My Changes 12:59...
Click to read more »than just a dictionary definition. There are many articles that have definitions on wiktionary that will also be on our wiki. A dictionary definition is...
Click to read more »like a dictionary definition to me.--Mr Wiki Pro (talk) 21:21, 16 July 2014 (UTC) Delete I agree with the user above. This is like a dictionary article...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Per Wikipedia:DICTIONARY article seems to be a dictionary definition of the word. As well as the article would...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:13, 8 April 2016 (UTC) Delete. Not in major dictionaries. One web dictionary categorizes it as "chiefly fandom slang". The sources failed...
Click to read more »NonvocalScream (talk) has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary definition. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. This was a dictionary definition, and I see little space for encyclopedic content. Note however...
Click to read more »request A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:DICTIONARY A1Cafel (talk) 07:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »(talk)~ has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is just a dictionary definition and belongs more correctly on simple.wiktionary which it already...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary Peterdownunder (talk) 01:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC) Vato (edit · talk...
Click to read more »example: In [[digital imaging]], a pixel<ref> Rudolf F. Graf, ''Modern Dictionary of Electronics'', 1999, Newnes, Oxford, page 569, ISBN 0-7506-43315, Google...
Click to read more »articles on En wiki, and contain nothing which is not in the dictionary. The dictionary is little more than a list of names. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:20...
Click to read more »compare our definition with the Tormont Webster's Illustrated Encyclopedic Dictionary definition of "car" (which redirects to "automobile"): A self-propelled...
Click to read more »not meant to be a dictionary page. Wiktionary exists for this--Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 23:07, 2 May 2020 (UTC) Delete Dictionary definitions aren't...
Click to read more »merging. Delete: Just a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 15:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC) Delete No more content than a dictionary definition. --AmaryllisGardener...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 184.2.99.185 (talk) 11:29, 6 July 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »reason: Not a well-used term, Wikipedia isn't a dictionary. Only source appears to be Urban Dictionary which doesn't show notability. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Will only ever be a dictionary definition. Osiris (talk) 05:32, 5 December 2013 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. —SEPTActaMTA8235— (t — c — l) 17:58, 26 April 2011 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »checking Basic English text - supports Basic English and various other dictionaries WriteIdea: writers' tool for writing simple text. Both java and web-based...
Click to read more »this being a BE850 word, the current entry offers little more than a dictionary definition, and would better fit Simple English Wiktionary. I think we...
Click to read more »be deleted on the reason that Wikipedia isn't a dictionary, because this page isn't purely a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 01:32, 10 June 2013...
Click to read more »request Creol has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not a dictionary --Creol(talk) 06:43, 2 January 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »merging. Delete - this is a dictionary definition, and the people at wiktionary are better (and more motivated) with dictionary definitions. Also I see little...
Click to read more »can have a good encyclopedia article written about them. To link to the dictionary definition of a word rather than an encyclopedic article, link to the...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary; this reads like a dictionary entry. Doesn't meet any QD criteria, though. --IWI (talk)...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. 轻语者 (talk) 02:03, 8 December 2019 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »Academic Press, 2005, p. 2. "Cite". Merriam-Webster's Collegiate(R) Dictionary. 2004. Retrieved 5 November 2011. Davis, Martin (2006). "The Church–Turing...
Click to read more »request Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary article Rathfelder (talk) 09:48, 15 June 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Only consists of a dictionary definition Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 13:24, 16 January 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 00:27, 15 January 2023 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Little more than a dictionary definition. No other pages link to it. Only (talk) 01:35, 7 October 2013...
Click to read more »175.223.20.153 Delete wikipedia is not a dictionary it is encyclopedia wikipedia don't use word from dictionary 1.11.169.5 This request is due to close...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Made-up word, not in any dictionary that I can find online. Osiris (talk) 08:08, 28 July 2013 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 15:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 18:11, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »upgoer6 tools can help to identify complex writing and vocabulary. Internet Dictionary Project software called IDP Companion translates between several languages...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 15:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »manuals, directories, lists of links, advertising, self-promotion, and dictionary definitions are not encyclopedic. These things are examples of what Wikipedia...
Click to read more »added was the etymology (origin) of the word, which is a normal part of a dictionary definition --Auntof6 (talk) 02:31, 12 January 2022 (UTC) Prosperity (edit...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:06, 31 October 2013 (UTC) Delete. As has been said, dictionary definitions are not useful to Simple Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment...
Click to read more »reason: Page already exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 14:21, 30 May 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »very similar to a dictionary definition and I don't think that an article can be written in Simple English that is not a dictionary definition. Perhaps...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Its not needed here. Look it up in the dictionary. not an encyclopedia. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is a as boiled down, a dictionary definition. Thank you for your consideration. NonvocalScream (talk) 02...
Click to read more »delete) Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary definition, and probably not encyclopedic. Auntof6 (talk) 05:30, 9 January...
Click to read more »request Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary article Rathfelder (talk) 13:54, 26 October 2023 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »request Creol has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a dictionary --Creol(talk) 06:43, 2 January 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete: dictionary item if at all: term is long outmoded. Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:50, 26...
Click to read more »not a dictionary, so the articles should have some substance to them besides saying Oh this is the fear of cisgender people (as that is a dictionary entry)...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: This is a dictionary-style definition of a word that doesn't exist in my dictionary. EhJJTALK 15:52, 27 May 2011 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »request Reception123 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary definition Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 15:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Page is oversimplified to the point of being misleading or incorrect. A dictionary definition; orphaned; no reliable sources; does not meet minimum requirements...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Little more than a dictionary definition. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that...
Click to read more »for deletion/Foreign language. Also en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Absolutiva (talk) 12:17, 12 December 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 14:46, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep: it's not a general dictionary word: 'lexeme' is never used except in linguistics. The issue here is...
Click to read more »word and does not belong in Wikipedia. Also, the main source is from a dictionary. Pending(tell me I screwed up and where) 20:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »C.K. Ogden's Basic English Voice Of America Special English Internet Dictionary Project using a Basic English Word List put in using how to do it at Basic...
Click to read more »Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is more a dictionary definition and is already at Wiktionary. It has remained unimproved for...
Click to read more »2024 (UTC) Keep I think already at a level where it has more than a dictionary entry, could be further expanded? --Ferien (talk) 11:47, 12 August 2024...
Click to read more »close request Only has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary definition that doesn't have a likelihood of expanding beyond a definition...
Click to read more »more than a dictionary would here. Justarandomamerican (t • c) 23:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC) Quick delete Wikipedia it’s not a dictionary. Beter transfer...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not encyclopedic. Dictionary definition. Gotanda (talk) 04:07, 9 June 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to be only a dictionary definition, I propose moving to Simple Wiktionary or deletion. Rubbish...
Click to read more »pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate article for every idea in the universe...
Click to read more »is not. It changed from being a dicdef to not being a dicdef. It was a dictionary definition. He requested it be deleted because it was a dicdef. It was...
Click to read more »George.Edward.C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary definition. George Edward C – Talk – Contributions 17:21, 12 December...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not encyclopedic dictionary definition with some speculation tacked on at the end. Gotanda (talk)...
Click to read more »deletion was declined and the article was stubified, but Wikipedia is not a dictionary and this doesn't have any real content in it. Thoughts? Belwine • 💬 •...
Click to read more »Keep: Osiris' additions improved the article and made it more than just a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 01:17, 8 October 2013 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. FuzzyDiceTalk 20:35, 1 September 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: As a Dictionary Definition (root word cruel part of Basic English 850) Rus793 (talk) 18:25...
Click to read more »delete) 216.99.65.80 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary Definition Only 216.99.65.80 (talk) 20:01, 16 April 2012 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »below: Reasons on Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not: "Wikipedia is not a dictionary", "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information" and "Wikipedia...
Click to read more »request Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary article Rathfelder (talk) 21:06, 9 September 2023 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »request A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:DICTIONARY A1Cafel (talk) 10:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:DICTIONARY A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »was to Delete. I note that there is a reference, but a reference to a dictionary definition does not establish notability. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:48, 16 May...
Click to read more »SlimyGecko7 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Per WP:DICTIONARY. Article does not exist on enwiki. SlimyGecko7 (talk) 09:38, 8 October...
Click to read more »memorials, instruction manuals, directories, lists of links, promotion, and dictionary definitions are not encyclopaedic. See What Wikipedia is not. If you are...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Per Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary, this should be on Wiktionary, not here Reception123 (talk) 08:12, 20...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I already copied this dictionary definition into Simple English Wiktionary and added to it. This article...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef. Wikipedia is not a dictionary User:Rus793 (talk) 00:08, 6 September 2015 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wikipedia is not a dictionary Passengerpigeon (talk) 02:54, 26 February 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »NonvocalScream (talk) has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary definition. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wikipedia is not a dictionary Passengerpigeon (talk) 17:00, 4 May 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wikipedia is not a dictionary Passengerpigeon (talk) 00:20, 26 January 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »request 64.6.124.31 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary definition. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 14:21, 16 July 2014 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »wikt. Oregonian2012 (talk) 22:19, 25 September 2013 (UTC) Delete: Just a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 23:25, 25 September 2013 (UTC) Delete - Same...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 184.2.99.185 (talk) 11:51, 6 July 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:50, 5 December 2013 (UTC) Delete: Not notable, and a dictionary defintion. Lugia2453 (talk) 19:22, 5 December 2013 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not encyclopedic. Dictionary definition. Gotanda (talk) 04:07, 9 June 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »Lugia2453 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Purely a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 00:49, 26 July 2013 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 18:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 16:48, 16 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete: Dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 02:30, 7 January 2014 (UTC) Delete. Dicdef...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:04, 2 February 2014 (UTC) I think this has gone beyond a dictionary definition. Osiris (talk) 07:48, 4 February 2014 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »not on wikt. and would probably not be acceptable there (concept, not a dictionary word). Maybe redirect to foreign aid. Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:43, 13...
Click to read more »reason: This appears to be a word definition, we are an encyclopedia, not a dictionary Krett12 (talk) 02:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Expanded to more than a dictionary definition. EhJJTALK 19:43, 6 June 2010 (UTC) World power (edit · talk...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 16:51, 16 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 184.2.99.185 (talk) 11:43, 6 July 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »as merging. Quick delete (G12): This is copied directly from The Free Dictionary. I tagged it for that reason. Lugia2453 (talk) 01:36, 15 June 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »in enWikt.Rus793 (talk) 13:23, 27 September 2013 (UTC) Delete: Just a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 23:22, 27 September 2013 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »wikt. Oregonian2012 (talk) 22:21, 25 September 2013 (UTC) Delete: Just a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 23:25, 25 September 2013 (UTC) Delete. Dicdef...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 18:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »(talk) has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Written as a dictionary definition rather than an encyclopedia article. Please discuss this deletion...
Click to read more »request A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:DICTIONARY A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »NonvocalScream (talk) has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary Definition. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that...
Click to read more »close request Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary definition with examples. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hwebul...
Click to read more »request Pure Evil has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary definition Pure Evil (talk) 20:39, 25 February 2023 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »are dictionary references. There are no sources to the history or common usage of the word, just what it means. SE Wikipedia is not a dictionary. More...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 15:33, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary The Anonymouse (talk | changes) 19:29, 25 April 2013 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and there are not enough articles on people named Pratik to turn this...
Click to read more »NonvocalScream (talk) has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary definition. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that...
Click to read more »is an OR blog-like spiel, and not suitable for us. It is basically a dictionary item puffed up. Delete. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:38, 30 March 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »descent" is a dictionary definition and simply defines the title, not to mention stating the obvious. I’ll remind you that dictionary definitions do...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dicdef: Wikipedia is not a dictionary User:Rus793 (talk) 13:42, 10 May 2016 (UTC) Request withdrawn after improvements...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete: Dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 19:24, 12 January 2014 (UTC) Keep, after...
Click to read more »examples like you are citing from the Oxford dictionary that we were not supposed to use the Oxford dictionary when I was in school many years ago. Because...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. PrimordialTaco :D (say hii) 00:56, 24 June 2020 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »usage and doesn't really claim notability. The article belongs more in a dictionary. MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 12:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete, per nom. Rus793 (talk) 15:34, 15 March 2014 (UTC) Delete: Dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 02:14, 17 March 2014 (UTC) Delete: Dicdef...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 14:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 21:22, 27 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nothing more than a dictionary definition of little use. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:39, 5 May 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »differences — see Spelling. Use The American·British–British·American Dictionary for English Speaking People or your own favorite/favourite reference....
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 184.2.99.185 (talk) 11:30, 6 July 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 21:16, 27 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »than a dicdef, and has a page on Wiktionary. Violates Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 16:49, 9 January 2015 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 67.239.113.78 (talk) 16:03, 23 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »Delete - Per nom. Rus793 (talk) 17:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC) Delete: Dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 67.239.113.78 (talk) 16:23, 23 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 67.239.113.78 (talk) 16:05, 23 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »pointless. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:18, 5 September 2013 (UTC) Delete: Just a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 01:30, 6 September 2013 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 12:44, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Delete: Just a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 01:21, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Withdraw request...
Click to read more »delete) Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A dictionary definition; no reliable source citations; nothing to indicate this is...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep: This is more of a stub than a dictionary definition, if you ask me. Sure it could use some sources, but otherwise...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 18:25, 30 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 21:14, 27 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 18:28, 30 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »merging. There is an entry in Wiktionary, and this pretty much reads like a dictionary definition. delete-Eptalon (talk) 11:45, 6 February 2023 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »request A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:DICTIONARY A1Cafel (talk) 13:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 184.2.99.185 (talk) 11:45, 6 July 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »request 64.6.124.31 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary definition. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 14:19, 16 July 2014 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »contentious material Dealing with articles about the deceased Encarta dictionary definition Retrieved 13 March 2008 This guideline also also applies to...
Click to read more »Dicdef. Oregonian2012 (talk) 16:15, 28 September 2013 (UTC) Delete: Just a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 23:54, 28 September 2013 (UTC) Keep, now...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 67.239.113.78 (talk) 15:20, 25 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 15:35, 16 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 15:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 15:50, 16 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Per WP:WINAD. Appears to act as a dictionary definition. Bobherry Talk My Changes 20:28, 20 June 2023 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »request A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:DICTIONARY A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 19 May 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 67.239.113.78 (talk) 15:16, 25 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 67.239.113.78 (talk) 15:19, 25 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 14:25, 16 July 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 184.2.99.185 (talk) 11:33, 6 July 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 21:24, 27 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:43, 12 December 2012 (UTC) Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary.--Mark91it's my world 19:31, 12 December 2012 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wikipedia isn't a dictionary Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:41, 3 April 2014 (UTC) Delete per nom. Just some dictionary definitions. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC) Delete as what...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wikitionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 67.239.113.78 (talk) 16:12, 23 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 67.239.113.78 (talk) 15:14, 25 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »(talk) has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No more than a dictionary definition. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 16:42, 16 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 21:20, 27 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 184.2.99.185 (talk) 11:37, 6 July 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 16:35, 16 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 15:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 67.239.113.78 (talk) 16:14, 23 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 67.239.113.78 (talk) 15:12, 25 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 14:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 67.239.113.78 (talk) 16:18, 23 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 14:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »a dicdef, and has been for several years. Violates Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 16:43, 9 January 2015 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »reason: QD was declined, but the way the article stands resembles like a dictionary entry, not an encyclopedia article. SHB2000 (talk) 05:59, 3 July 2022...
Click to read more »expansion and sources, but otherwise, it's a perfectly good stub. It's not a dictionary definition at all. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:16, 17 October 2013 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »SEWikitionary as it is dictionary style.-- Tdxiang 10:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete as it is unencyclopedic and is dictionary-style.-- Tdxiang 08:07...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep: It doesn't seem like a dictionary definition to me. Lugia2453 (talk) 16:52, 7 April 2013 (UTC) Delete. It's...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. The article as we have it now, is a dictionary definition, at best. Big question: can we get encyclopdic content: If...
Click to read more ») Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:35, 29 September 2013 (UTC) Delete: Just a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:13, 29 September 2013 (UTC) Delete - Nothing...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wikipedia is not a dictionary; original research. User:Rus793 (talk) 14:49, 21 November 2015 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »don't see anything wrong with it. The article, is a bit more than just a 'dictionary entry' --Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 00:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC) Redirect...
Click to read more »request Pure Evil has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary definition Pure Evil (talk) 20:40, 22 February 2023 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 19:24, 4 June 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wikipedia is not a dictionary Lights and freedom (talk) 00:44, 5 February 2023 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Page containing one dictionary definition, and one paragraph about medical treatments, both of which...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 19:12, 4 June 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 67.239.113.78 (talk) 15:22, 25 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »possible article.-- † CR90 11:00, 17 November 2009 (UTC) Snow delete as a dictionary term with no encyclopedic content. EhJJTALK 02:31, 17 November 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »I am deleting this per the consensus below, and as Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Ferien (talk) 19:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC) Permission (edit · talk ·...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on WIktionary. Contradicts WIkipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 67.239.113.78 (talk) 16:20, 23 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »which is correct. "Used to" is considered more correct by some (such as A Dictionary of Modern Usage (1998) by Bryan A. Garner), but others disagree. I don't...
Click to read more »Delete. Dicdef. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:11, 3 January 2014 (UTC) Delete: Dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 03:04, 4 January 2014 (UTC) Delete: Dicdef...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 15:01, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »projects Link with articles in other languages Simple English Wiktionary, a dictionary and thesaurus in Simple English Wikispecies, a directory of species Wikisource...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. This is simply a list of words with a certain ending. Not a list that...
Click to read more »extension. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 18:02, 21 March 2014 (UTC) Delete: Dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC) Delete I wouldn't...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete: Dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 15:23, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Delete - A dicdef...
Click to read more »individual surnames such as Lee, Wang, William nor Smith. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and this should be transwikied to Wiktionary. SHB2000 (talk) 12:17, 22...
Click to read more »Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 12:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Delete: Just a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 01:21, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Redirect to Shoemaking...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:20, 20 September 2013 (UTC) Delete: Just a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 19:02, 20 September 2013 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on WIktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 67.239.113.78 (talk) 16:25, 23 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »belong in Wiktionary. People seem to think that "simple" means give a dictionary definition because "simple" readers won't be able to understand anything...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Contradict's Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 16:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »one. The people at Wiktionary are better and more motivated to handle dictionary definitions. --Eptalon (talk) 10:41, 14 December 2014 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »the reason: In its current form the article is an English textbook or dictionary entry. Kai Burghardt (talk) 04:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 184.2.99.185 (talk) 11:53, 6 July 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 16:02, 16 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »students: provide an online dictionary for their vocabularies, and explain on the run the newly introduced words. Links to the dictionary are even more practical...
Click to read more »Universal Language Dictionary. This is a project to define a small vocabulary (1600 words) to design artificial languages. This dictionary includes many words...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 21:18, 27 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 15:45, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Just an unsourced dictionary definition. Sophocrat (talk) 03:00, 21 January 2026 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »information. It's just the title run through a thesaurus. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Very short articles: Some very short articles can be quickly deleted...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: WP:WINAD. This article is only a dictionary-style definition. Carrot2333 (talk) 00:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 18:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 15:46, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Violated WP:DICTIONARY A1Cafel (talk) 13:17, 9 April 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 18:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »request Batrachoseps has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A dictionary definition and poor title for an article. We already have stigma (a dab...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 16:31, 16 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »request A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:DICTIONARY A1Cafel (talk) 09:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »merging. Keep. Needs explanation on this wiki, and is not a standard dictionary term. The word as socially used contains a sly allusion to riding a horse...
Click to read more »Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 12:44, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Delete: Just a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 01:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Withdraw request...
Click to read more »(talk) has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: More of a dictionary definition type entry, and the notability is not asserted so is unclear...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 18:03, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is essentially a dictionary definition. But not even a good one at that because it mentions only a...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary definition. And I have to agree with the other editor that hijacking the...
Click to read more »2016. "Rich Man's Disease – definition of Rich Man's Disease in the Medical dictionary". Free Online Medical Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia....
Click to read more »Result: Keep PullToOpenTalk 19:26, 30 December 2006 (UTC) Looks like a dictionary definitions to me. As such, can be taken care of by Wiktionary -- Eptalon...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 16:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »If not delete. --Tbennert (talk) 01:50, 28 February 2014 (UTC) Delete: Dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 00:46, 1 March 2014 (UTC) Keep as first choice...
Click to read more »delete) Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary definition that already exists on Simple English Wiktionary. The only...
Click to read more »theory" (restore) (copyright violation copied verbatim from various online dictionaries) 20:40, 15 Dec 2004 Netoholic deleted "Fire" (restore) (jibberish / user...
Click to read more »on its own, as a topic where any potential article would likely be a dictionary definition. We could redirect to Embarrassment once it has enough information...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 14:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »Cyclonial has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:DICTIONARY Cyclonial (talk) 21:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is a borderline dictionary definition, rephrasing of the title, and one "fact". Please discuss this...
Click to read more »WikiData which has sealed the deal so cool, Guess this one-lined short dictionary definition lives another day!. –Davey2010Talk 01:10, 11 April 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »request A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:DICTIONARY A1Cafel (talk) 10:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »unnotable neologism. Even if it were commonly used, it isn't more than a dictionary definition, so seems to be a clear delete. Kansan (talk) 20:31, 28 November...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: 1. Article is basically a dictionary definition with a little bit of unneeded info about which Asian countries...
Click to read more »reason: Page already exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 17:16, 16 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 184.2.99.185 (talk) 11:40, 6 July 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »in the use of G1, G3, A1 and A4? A: How would you handle the usage of dictionary definitions to define BE 850 terms? A: Strongest Possible Oppose and Close...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Delete due time is over and i think no source from news or dictionary 124.52.60.213 124.52.60.213 ♮ 06:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »Latin. 172.58.102.230 (talk) 17:11, 16 March 2022 (UTC) We are not a dictionary and etymology of words aren't used here, which, in my opinion, makes this...
Click to read more »or countries, even for known names, just as in the American Heritage Dictionary. --89.148.2.44 14:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC) We hit article 14,000 today...
Click to read more »delete) NonvocalScream has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary definition only, nothing here to explain the notability of concept, et...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 19:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not encyclopedic, and not a dictionary. Zaxxon0 (talk) 05:32, 18 June 2019 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »Mac-donald's additions made this into an article that's more than just a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 01:52, 1 November 2013 (UTC) Keep: per Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary. SHB2000 (talk) 07:19, 31 October 2021 (UTC) This operational definition...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep - The article is more than a dictionary definition - the article explains what doors are important for. Please...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. A museum is defined in my Webster's New World Dictionary as "an institution devoted to the procurement, care, study, and display...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 16:15, 16 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Currently just a dictionary definition. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my User talk)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Sorry to all the "isogenders" out there but we aren't a dictionary. We can't just add new words as we please. - Angerxiety+ 12:38, 11 April...
Click to read more »definition of a word. Describing a subject like this is would not be a dictionary definition. That being said while I understand the point being made, it...
Click to read more »information. :) --Auntof6 (talk) 12:39, 11 October 2013 (UTC) Delete: Just a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 00:03, 14 October 2013 (UTC) Keep, now that...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom it is a dicdef. This is an encyclopaedia not a dictionary. Blissyu2 (talk) 14:39, 10 April 2023 (UTC) There is a lot more to be...
Click to read more »01:31, 15 November 2024 (UTC) Its an unreferenced one liner. Better as a dictionary definition. Rathfelder (talk) 23:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC) And ?, It's...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. SEPTActaMTA8235 (talk) 20:43, 6 April 2011 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 184.2.99.185 (talk) 11:27, 6 July 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »rather than deleted. There are other ways to make it better, take it from dictionary definition and make it become a true article. Angela Maureen (talk) 22:34...
Click to read more »request Diadophis has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary definition. The content here is already covered at List of phobias. Diadophis...
Click to read more »English Dictionary) says: Movie - n. esp. US colloq. A motion picture film. then take the definition of colloquial, from the same dictionary: cooloquial...
Click to read more »into en.wiktionary and not a combined simple. For the sheer fact that dictionaries are supposed to be simple english, sort of the point of them. -DJSasso...
Click to read more »are too simple to link? And, by the way, a dictionary is available to anyone online by typing "dictionary" into the address bar. I begin to do what I...
Click to read more »on Simple English Wiktionary not here. This is an encyclopedia not a dictionary or thesarus. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that...
Click to read more »vague attempt at a definition of a figure of speech. We do not include dictionary definitions here. Not encyclopedic. Gotanda (talk) 01:26, 22 March 2019...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete: Just a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 23:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC) Keep, now...
Click to read more »CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Basically a dictionary def. without sources. No reason shown why this is different from pop music...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 18:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 64.6.124.31 (talk)...
Click to read more »template with a reason input, and nominated Wikipedia:Simple English Dictionary for deletion, as circumstances have now changed since its last nomination...
Click to read more »a small description of the subject but this isn't what is known as a dictionary definition. Whether or not it should be merged I have no comment. But...
Click to read more »would be. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:42, 29 August 2013 (UTC) Delete: Just a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 02:36, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Keep, now that...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: What we have here is a pure dictionary definition,of a word, with some examples. I think it would be preferable...
Click to read more »pretty much copies what's on Wiktionary. Violates Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy 64.6.124.31 (talk) 16:46, 9 January 2015 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »--Derpdart56 (talk) 15:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC) Delete, Simple is not a dictionary. --Tarawneh (talk) 05:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC) Delete - The actual...
Click to read more »wikt:vice versa now. Osiris (talk) 01:55, 9 October 2013 (UTC) Delete: Just a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 01:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC) Delete. dicdef...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 64.6.124.31 (talk) 15:25, 16 June 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »regarding the "in other projects", that's a cross reference from the dictionary to the encyclopedia. Simple is considered another language, not another...
Click to read more »actually show anything helpful. You link to a dictionary definition, but that page also has a dictionary definition for transportation. You link to some...
Click to read more »(talk) 09:29, 1 October 2013 (UTC) Delete: It's not in any mainstream dictionaries I could find and seems to be a misnomer. Common noun is the proper term...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: No way this is notable. First hit on Google is UrbanDictionary. Not much after that. Osiris (talk) 20:49, 24 October 2013 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »think those artciles are not encyclopedic, but rather, they are more dictionary entries. However, this is "my" opinion. We need to discuss it, or refer...
Click to read more »Dictionary definition that doesn't need its own article. J Di 11:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC) Article was deleted (along with wax) as part of dictionary...
Click to read more »request Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary article Rathfelder (talk) 20:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »a dictionary definition and not an encyclopedia entry. Someone will sooner or later transwiki it to wiktionary, if it really is only a dictionary entry...
Click to read more »the reason: Page exists on Wiktionary. Contradicts Wikipedia's "Not a dictionary" policy. 184.2.99.185 (talk) 11:49, 6 July 2014 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »the number articles. Finally, not all articles with {{dicdef}} are pure dictionary definitions. Therefore, I would prefer using WP:RFD. --rimshottalk 12:09...
Click to read more »Maureen (talk) 01:51, 9 January 2014 (UTC) Delete per Angela. It's a dictionary definition, too. Lugia2453 (talk) 02:21, 9 January 2014 (UTC) Delete -...
Click to read more »delete) Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A dictionary definition, Orphaned, Complex and probable OR Rus793 (talk) 13:39, 9 September...
Click to read more »allows you to use a Simple English dictionary for spellchecking has been updated by User:Lwyx. Loading the dictionary into Firefox underlines all words...
Click to read more »those without sources are typically very short and try to avoid looking a dictionary definition. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 02:46, 23 April 2025 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »users click on the other likely title in the hat-note suggestion. Online dictionaries, for years, have been listing other choices when a user enters misspelled...
Click to read more »has nonetheless created the article and it is referenced to the Cassell Dictionary of Slang. — Cheers, Truth's Out There –talk– 08:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Engländer is a special case of a Schraubenschlüssel. We are not writing a dictionary here - there is no need to point to the translation of every topic in...
Click to read more »his work is not listed in any first-rate museums. These "historical dictionaries" list everyone there is. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »mix the wordlists of SIMPLE.dic and Rick Harrison's Universal Language Dictionary, and fixed a bug in the file simple.aff; Rick's wordlist includes several...
Click to read more »Delete - In desperate need of cleanup and nothing more really, than a dictionary definition. Jon@talk:~$ 05:50, 2 October 2011 (UTC) Extended for another...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is just merely a dictionary definition that falls under WP:NOT. The en wiki version is much more developed...
Click to read more »As far as I know, "Alot" is not even a word that appears in a standard dictionary. I think these should be changed. Billz (Talk) 09:41, 31 July 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep: With the additions made to the article, it's no longer just a dictionary definition. Lugia2453 (talk) 01:18, 21 October 2013 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »means is that coming across a word that one doesn't know, one uses a dictionary to look up the meanings of that particular word. Page has 11 totally different...
Click to read more »not up to date. What I proposed at the time I think was to compile a "dictionary" of perhaps 10.000 words. With that, ignore proper names/placenames. "Architecture"...
Click to read more »harder by the fact that many of the dab pages here are more like lists of dictionary definitions than they are like links to pages a reader might be looking...
Click to read more »a close call but there is some help at: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Rus793 (talk) 14:02, 5 June 2014 (UTC) This request is due to close on...
Click to read more »the use of second person. Obviously, there is a difference between a dictionary and an encyclopedia, but I agree with him that language students do tend...
Click to read more »their encyclopedic articles in Simple English, they probably need their dictionary definitions in Simple English We should be promoting the Simple English...
Click to read more »sense to make things any more complex than they need to be. Webster's Dictionary' gives the definition of consensus as "general agreement", so "agreement"...
Click to read more »Simple English dictionary for Firefox. I like it a lot. (I wish it said "Simple English" instead of "English" in the spell checker dictionary list.) Do you...
Click to read more »reference works on world religions (e.g. Encyclopaedia of Religion, Oxford Dictionary of World Religions) University press publications on religious history...
Click to read more »demographic is. Many Europeans with a good grasp of their own language and a dictionary can battle their way through a highly literate article if they are determined...
Click to read more »Article isn't necessary, as it exists on Wiktionary already. More of a dictionary definition than an article. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 18:41, 22 October 2017...
Click to read more »post a message to his talk page later. That said, the mass creation of dictionary-style entries for the sole purpose of hitting a certain milestone faster...
Click to read more »any other stub. It already provides useful information and it's not a dictionary definition. It's clearly notable, because 900 people died. Kk.urban (talk)...
Click to read more »a mistake to think that a wikt definition could explain it properly. Dictionaries tell you what words mean, they do not explain historical context and...
Click to read more »Not notable. What little I can find about it on Google (i.e the Urban Dictionary entry of all things, or the wiki some other pages this account made cited)...
Click to read more »proposed deletion is that the article is a dicdef. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so we don't keep dicdef articles. If this is a dicdef, we don't keep...
Click to read more »Best, NonvocalScream (talk) 04:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC) It's currently a dictionary definition, so I personally would have deleted and transwiki'd by now...
Click to read more »spoken with non wikipedian native speakers of English who needed to get a dictionary as they didn't know what disambiguation was. This only makes me more certain...
Click to read more »unsigned comment added by 209.244.16.185 (talk • contribs) We don't do dictionary definitions here. Have a look on the Simple English Wiktonary or the normal...
Click to read more »wiktionary (which was the whole idea in the first place, since we can't have dictionary definitions in an encyclopedia), so it partially contradicts itself. Currently...
Click to read more »helping people understand the difference between an encyclopedia and a dictionary! - PhilipR (talk) 03:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC) Hi, everybody. I want to...
Click to read more »Creol(talk) 23:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC) Wiktionary is a multilingual dictionary explaining all words in every language in Simple English. We don't have...
Click to read more »improve wiki with. I'm sure y'all know please find a way to add a speaking dictionary. SO, I DONT NEED TO GOTO OTHER SIGHTS TO KNOW HOW A WORD OR SUBJUCT SHOULD...
Click to read more »— neuro(talk) 19:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC) (ec)Exactly! How about simply using the dictionary definition (either inline or instead of)? Something like "worthy of notice...
Click to read more »necessary to link non-simple terms to articles about those terms, or to dictionary entries for them. In this way, the non-simple terms can, themselves, be...
Click to read more »in future. Is it acceptable to just link (not redirect) to the Simple Dictionary, however? I've done that a couple times now but can revert if need be...
Click to read more »"Vietnam". That's how you will see it in every almanac, atlas, encyclopedia, dictionary, that uses the English language, and not "Việtnam" which is the correct...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:10, 8 June 2021 (UTC) What's your evidence? The Oxford English Dictionary uses U.S.A. WP is pretty formal, and I would expect traditional typography...
Click to read more »much more simpler and -ing and other endings are in the simple english dictionary. However, I also feel the 1st one is just as good. PDLTalk to me!OMG,...
Click to read more »that's not just simplified, "found in" isn't what "endemic" means. The dictionary I looked at, www.WordReference.com, gives "belonging exclusively or confined...
Click to read more »some people then turn that into slang for bars. The definition from the dictionary "a depression in which water collects, especially one from which animals...
Click to read more »problem, I do not see it as an external link, it just takes you to our dictionary. There are many words that need a definition which are not suitable for...
Click to read more »per enWP. I understand the argument for Ancestry, but we can't ignore dictionary definitions in our aim to be simple. For the sake of argument, is there...
Click to read more »agree with Eptalon. It is very difficult to expand the article beyond a dictionary entry and I am already trying to improve other articles so that the use...
Click to read more »know if something is too complex. Someone in the past created a firefox dictionary for simple English which some people liked using but again that only helps...
Click to read more »--Auntof6 (talk) 09:53, 16 November 2015 (UTC) Yeah there is a Firefox dictionary for Simple English that does a similar thing. I believe it uses our different...
Click to read more »refs on it since it declares some famous nobles. It’s kinda between a dictionary entry and an extended definition. If we have something similar, I too...
Click to read more »70 publishers in every major subject, including general and subject dictionaries and encyclopedias. There are 125 full Credo 350 accounts available, with...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:40, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Keep This is a not a single world dictionary entry. It is a well established concept in sociology. The very brief stub...
Click to read more »a replica of some original form. In essence I agree with DJS above. Dictionaries can be useful, and so can Roget's thesaurus, which some editors may not...
Click to read more »2011 (UTC) Where on Wiktionary would it go, though? Wiktionary is for dictionary definitions, and this isn't really one. Kansan (talk) 21:31, 19 January...
Click to read more »Tdxiang 08:18, 21 April 2007 (UTC) WP is not a dictionary, and this article is basically a dictionary definition. Dreyderswinson 16:21, 7 April 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »to be everything such people might need. It is an encyclopedia, not a dictionary, as stated in policy and in this guideline. -- Auntof6 (talk) 00:01, 21...
Click to read more »some parts of the article that had little to do with this, such as a dictionary definition of "duster" and a mention of the stock symbol of the company...
Click to read more »with a strict template, possibly even auto generated. The other is a dictionary.com article which is a much better source, but again the article doesn’t...
Click to read more »(talk) 06:19, 5 January 2013 (UTC) Merge within one of the two English dictionaries unless this valid word doesn't exist there. ONaNcle (talk) 09:13, 4 January...
Click to read more »very wrong) articles, many of them on non-notable subjects or apparent dictionary entries and no references. They are all related to the Bodo people. The...
Click to read more »article isn't getting much attention. I really feel this falls under "not a dictionary" and should be deleted for that reason, but also because if it is better...
Click to read more »Argument (from 2013) to Delete: "Delete as non-notable neologisms. Urban Dictionary is thattaway.------> /// [...] 23:09, 15 September 2013". See English-wiki...
Click to read more »popular in a small circle. Here is the definition of popular in oxford dictionary (liked or admired by many people or by a particular person or group)....
Click to read more »or parliamentary records Established encyclopaedias and biographical dictionaries Academic or political science publications Major newswires and outlets...
Click to read more »you wrote on "Lick" was fine, but the simple english wikipedia is not a dictionary. If you would like to write about what words mean, please use the . [english...
Click to read more »done nothing to the number pages that have even the slightest bit of non-dictionary content. --rimshottalk 11:50, 20 July 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. - Huji...
Click to read more »where this person get this from. Name what it says it came from urban dictionary and references where it came from (Psychological institutes) proving those...
Click to read more »it doesn't only refer to "creature", but would that make it more of a dictionary definition than encyclopedia article? 78.26 (talk) 14:54, 27 February...
Click to read more »more as if this article is more encyclopedic and more informative than a dictionary definition and thus I still stand by my vote to keep the article. --GeorgeBarnick...
Click to read more »source types work well: Established encyclopaedias and biographical dictionaries Official government or parliamentary records Academic or peer-reviewed...
Click to read more »mentions dasikane in passing. No mention of their orthodoxy. Ref 3 is a dictionary link to a sanskrit word with no connection explained Ref 4 no mention...
Click to read more »· talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) Wikipedia is not a dictionary. An entry already exists at Simple English Wiktionary.-- Lights talk ...
Click to read more »for your help. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=coolie http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/coolie To me it is obvious that this article was...
Click to read more »Naturalis Principia Mathematica On the Origin of Species Oxford English Dictionary Gulliver's Travels King Lear Macbeth A Midsummer Night's Dream Othello...
Click to read more »Those articles should be deleted because they are not core articles. Panda Bear 14:48, 17 June 2007 (UTC) (I have merged the two other requests into this...
Click to read more »respectively) Review the article about cold (which is currently a dictionary definition, unfit for this wikipedia, more suited to wiktionary) Redirect...
Click to read more »a simple encyclopedia entry that Reagan was elected #3 and an unclear dictionary citation #9. This article shows no sign of become more neutral in point...
Click to read more »thing? Lights and freedom (talk) 03:28, 14 May 2023 (UTC) That is the dictionary definition of each, simplified. I was highlighting the very slight difference...
Click to read more »written and published major works about it. Entries in biographical dictionaries that allow people to write about themselves, (such as the Marquis Who's...
Click to read more »in one of the articles I read on this topic: I checked four different dictionaries, and two don't include woman as an adjective (1, 2), one does (3), and...
Click to read more »new word to my dictionary xD. Well, you can do it --Ravave (talk) 11:06, 18 August 2015 (UTC) Not to worry, Ravave. It's not a dictionary word (yet?); it's...
Click to read more »Naturalis Principia Mathematica On the Origin of Species Oxford English Dictionary Gulliver's Travels King Lear Macbeth A Midsummer Night's Dream Othello...
Click to read more »Punishment Respect Shyness Trust Language Constructed language Dialect Dictionary Grammar Adjective Adverb Conjunction Grammatical case Noun Pronoun Sentence...
Click to read more »it when searching on Google either, only found blogs and open content dictionaries. Zaxxon0 (talk) 23:03, 4 August 2019 (UTC) Comment: Just to let everyone...
Click to read more »language, so you might want to check the meaning of "imagine" in a learner's dictionary. It is not realistic to expect users to have already used the permissions...
Click to read more »replace="$1mok"/><!-- Amuck is valid https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/amuck--> <Typo word="Among" find="\b([aA])mo?ung(st)?\b" replace="$1mong$2"/>...
Click to read more »en.wikipedia |Date= 1913 |Author= Public domain image from ''Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia'', 1913 (Transparent background added October 23, 2006)...
Click to read more »spelling, plurals, etc. would definitely be possible to identify using a dictionary file or APIs but since that has a much greater ability to produce erroneous...
Click to read more »17 February 2009 (UTC) Then what was I supposed to do with it? Write a dictionary entry for Leathermouth? --§ Snake311 (I'm Not Okay!) 00:16, 19 February...
Click to read more »at: "Philosophy". Cambridge Dictionary Online. Cambridge University Press. and "Philosophy". Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. Merriam-Webster.). If the...
Click to read more »know that in reading Spanish I constantly have to check words with the dictionary, and figure out the (for me) complicated Spanish verb tense system. It...
Click to read more »chance be able to find the ISBN number for the "Yves Renouil (dir.), Dictionary of Wine, Féret et fils, Bordeaux, 1962" bibliography work? It's the only...
Click to read more »functions than carrying nutrititents and water. Manual of style issues: In a dictionary, you, or we has no place. Most of the article is a bigger-better-faster...
Click to read more »is meant, whereas "mayor" is more generic. Check with a good American dictionary. That aside, congratulations! Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:31, 21 September...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:13, 8 August 2019 (UTC) It was deleted for being a dicdef (dictionary definition). If someone wants to write a more fleshed-out article, that...
Click to read more »|first= |last= |work=Holidays, Festivals, and Celebrations of the World Dictionary |year=2010 |accessdate=2011-07-11}}</ref> Saturn's symbol is ♄ which is...
Click to read more »of it in our MOS. I looked through sample of entries in the Australian Dictionary of Biography to see how they did it - both ways! Any other ideas for this...
Click to read more »language, so you might want to check the meaning of "imagine" in a learner's dictionary. It is not realistic to expect users to have already used the permissions...
Click to read more »fringe 6165 pier 6166 empathy 6167 vinegar 6168 cone 6169 fascinate 6170 dictionary 6171 lengthy 6172 sufficiently 6173 accessory 6174 firefighter 6175 whoo...
Click to read more »that some people couldn’t understand, for example i had to look in the dictionary words like “namesake” (A complex word even in my native language: Spanish)...
Click to read more »December 2021 (UTC) Endorse deletion: the content was no more than a dictionary definition. If more medical-type content were added, it could be encyclopedic...
Click to read more »overlaps with recently blocked users. First this user is using a non-dictionary term "deletation" (special:diff/9255394). This doesn't seem to be a widely...
Click to read more »generation by AI, when the end result is identical to me going and using a dictionary and comparing it to BE 1500? And if I don't disclose this, how will we...
Click to read more »language (and wanted to discuss on whether a link after the term to the wikt dictionary would be a good placeholder for each item until they are translated by...
Click to read more »could be made. Otherwise keep it as it is. We're an encyclopedia not a dictionary. :) fr33kman 19:18, 20 September 2023 (UTC) What are the chances that...
Click to read more »was told that was shot down. Even worse is some articles are basically dictionary definitions that are never expanded on. Again only being a sentence or...
Click to read more »simple english wikipedians can't read this without spending hours in dictionaries. Anachronistic projection of modern territories? Probably not, but I...
Click to read more »November 2024 (UTC) Yeah, "diplomat corps" is not in any (reputable) dictionaries - however folksy language that journalists or other writers use, according...
Click to read more »luck, WPCleaner does have a interwiki linking finder but it's all WikiDictionary or whatever it's called, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »