Redirect to:
version of the GFDL. Important note: The Wikimedia Foundation does not own copyright on Wikipedia article texts and illustrations. It is therefore useless...
Click to read more »free images. All of the images on the "Commons" web site are free of copyright and can be used anywhere in the world. This supports Simple English's...
Click to read more »including how to reword it for Simpler English and how to stay within copyright law using the GFDL license and proper attribution of source. (This applies...
Click to read more »WikiMedia Foundation (WMF) was looking for comments about updating the copyright licenses for all of its projects (which includes the Simple English Wikipedia)...
Click to read more »do not provide attribution to the source page, it will be deleted as a copyright infringement. Any user can request an import by an admin at the administrators'...
Click to read more »and should state: What part of the copyrighted work is used and to what degree does it compete with the copyright holder's usage? For example, if the...
Click to read more »Be aware of copyright. Do not put material on Wikipedia that is copyrighted by somebody else. As most things on the Internet are copyrighted, do not just...
Click to read more »IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT AND/OR OTHER APPLICABLE LAW. ANY USE OF THE WORK OTHER THAN AS AUTHORIZED UNDER THIS LICENSE OR COPYRIGHT LAW IS PROHIBITED...
Click to read more »to. People who write content on Wikipedia do not have to give up their copyright to the material they contribute. However, they must license their changes...
Click to read more »was to Delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:03, 28 May 2025 (UTC) Criticism of copyright (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request...
Click to read more »information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail, or other meaningful, relevant content that is not...
Click to read more »sources which isn't that good quality to portray this, as well as possible copyright issues as pointed below, in addition to WP:OR and WP:NOT an essay. Camouflaged...
Click to read more »Unanimous consensus. --Ferien (talk) 23:07, 4 July 2023 (UTC) Wikipedia:Copyright problems (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close...
Click to read more »proper training in copyright law so that I am able to advise teachers on their legal obligations under the copyright laws. Copyright is an issue that has...
Click to read more »misunderstood copyright as episode titles aren't copyright, In fact none of the content you've added here or at List of My Dear Heart episodes is copyright so you're...
Click to read more »rules about how users should act. Wikipedia:Blocks and bans Wikipedia:Copyrights Wikipedia:Deletion policy Wikipedia:Edit war Wikipedia:Image use policy...
Click to read more »Project pages Wikipedia:Cleanup – a list of pages that need help Wikipedia:Copyrights – remember not to add text that belongs to someone else Wikipedia:Glossary...
Click to read more »Copyvio Copyright violation. Usually used in an edit summary when some copyrighted material has been added to Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Data...
Click to read more »vandalised a lot, like the Main Page. The site's logo, press releases, and key copyright and license pages, for legal reasons. Personal CSS and JS pages; these...
Click to read more »for what the GFDL is. Do not edit this page Version 1.2, November 2002 Copyright (C) 2000,2001,2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 59 Temple Place, Suite...
Click to read more »it should not be quickly deleted using this rule. Obviously breaking copyright law like a page that is: Copied from another website which does not have...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete copyright infringement. Note: a copyrighted page does not need a copyright symbol to claim copyright protection. The author is...
Click to read more »someone you represent. Copyright How to copy text on Wikipedia, donate your text, or report unallowed use of your copyrighted work. Press and partnerships...
Click to read more »comply with the policies and guidelines on Simple Wikipedia as well as copyright law. Pages that include AI content must include the template {{AI-notice}}...
Click to read more »principle that it be a free-content project so that legal issues regarding copyright are avoided or at least minimized. Most Wikipedia Foundation projects...
Click to read more »DMacks (talk) 15:02, 22 November 2022 (UTC) Keep it was copyright edit but I all copyright text removed and correct the meaning fully sentence about...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Delete. Quickly deleted by Fr33kman as a copyright violation. Depextual (talk) 18:08, 8 December 2024 (UTC) Brite Benson...
Click to read more »happen? If copyright is infringed the lawyers for the copyright holder inform the offending website who then takes the image off the site. Copyright law doesn't...
Click to read more »the law. If there is a page that needs to be deleted because it is a copyright violation, then tag it with {{qd|g12|(name of site)}} so that an administrator...
Click to read more »someone you represent. Copyright How to copy text on Wikipedia, donate your text, or report unallowed use of your copyrighted work. Press and partnerships...
Click to read more »is a copyright violation. Rus793 (talk) 02:55, 21 August 2014 (UTC) Comment - Page should have better attribution, to avoid chance of copyright violation...
Click to read more »Speedy close, as article is clearly a pesronal opinion, and possible copyright vio.--Peterdownunder (talk) 21:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC) Should kids have...
Click to read more »these terms and conditions. Adapted Material means material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights that is derived from or based upon the Licensed Material...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Article was quick deleted by Macdonald-ross for copyright violation. I have tagged the article under QD G4. Shoot for the Stars...
Click to read more »page wher you need them. The text that was here might be someone else's copyright. It has been removed. The text that was here was the same as text from...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Quickly deleted as copyright violation --IWI (talk) 06:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC) Sourav Jain (edit · talk...
Click to read more »which is based on Wikipedia will bypass that check. There can also be copyright problems. Do not use sources which copied their information from Wikipedia...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. QD'd as a copyright violation. Chenzw Talk 04:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC) The history of small...
Click to read more »Version 1.2, November 2002 Translated into simple English, August 2003 Copyright (C) 2000,2001,2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 59 Temple Place, Suite...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Person is notable, copyright-infringing parts have been removed/rewritten--Eptalon (talk) 07:24, 14...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's policies and guidelines (especially Wikipedia:BLP, Wikipedia:Copyright, Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Notability). The user right is...
Click to read more »Breaking Wikipedia policies Adding pages or sentences that are against copyright Having an inappropriate username Users should be warned with the right...
Click to read more »proper training in copyright law so that I am able to advise teachers on their legal obligations under the copyright laws. Copyright is an issue that has...
Click to read more »close request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copyright violation, no attribution Rus793 (talk) 02:49, 21 August 2014 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »Category:Possible copyright violations category should be regularly pruned. Some of the articles in there have been tagged for quite some time. Keeping copyright violations...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Contested quick deletion (G12-Copyright); page looks simple and generic. Keep or delete? Eptalon (talk) 23:30...
Click to read more »close request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copyright violation, no attribution Rus793 (talk) 02:52, 21 August 2014 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »little useful here although it does appear to be a clear copyright violation per Wikipedia:Copyrights (the example given for the fair use exception is "one...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's guidelines on conflict of interest. Shortcut WP:OIWP:OI Because of copyright law in a number of countries, there are relatively few existing images...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. QD'd as copyright violation. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:56, 6 May 2019 (UTC) George Edward Donovan...
Click to read more »copyright vio, advertising puff, totally unsimplified, unwikified... Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:52, 19 June 2013 (UTC) Quick delete (G12): A copyright violation...
Click to read more »Quick Deletion and the reason is copyright infringement, since Wikipedia is Free-content why it's considered as copyright infringement? Thank you 🌸 Sakura...
Click to read more »for deletion was to Delete. Speedily deleted by Peterdownunder as a copyright violation. Margaret leslie davis (edit · talk · history · links · watch...
Click to read more »EhJJ writes about the CC license and the impact of a possible change of copyright policy on the Simple English Wikipedia. Shappy - Article 2 Shappy talks...
Click to read more »to Keep. I see no direct overlap with the cited website (so, no ,no copyright issue), also the page seems to have two sources. Needs cleanup, perhaps...
Click to read more »major concern for me - basically all the new pages from Synergy are GFDL copyright infringements. When creating an article significantly copied from the...
Click to read more »single-purpose accounts that just create spam articles. This one is likely a copyright violation as well. BRP ever 05:40, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. QD as copyright violation -Djsasso (talk) 19:16, 28 October 2021 (UTC) California Victor...
Click to read more »are known to be not under copyright.": that's right for many sources, but not Wikipedia. Text on Wikipedia is copyrighted, but the licenses everyone...
Click to read more »asking the Wikimedia Discord server, I found somebody with access to the copyrighted source and I found that a significant section of the article is identical...
Click to read more »clear, and there is no editorial reason to keep the revision. Removal of copyright violations on the advice of Wikimedia Foundation counsel. Hiding of blatant...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Quickly deleted as copyright violation and spam. Operator873talkconnect 02:20, 10 April 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:ANWP:AN WP:ANBWP:ANB WP:ANIWP:ANI WP:AN/IWP:AN/I WP:RFPPWP:RFPP This is a message board for talking about tasks on Wikipedia that only administrators...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Quickly deleted due to copyright violation Operator873 connect 05:35, 2 June 2022 (UTC) Bludgeoning Angel...
Click to read more »Wikipedia fall under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) with the copyright being kept by the original author. This is a guide for using multiple...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Nuked as Copyright infringement. Barras talk 15:00, 25 July 2025 (UTC) Ayangba (edit · talk...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. copyright violation Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:20, 5 May 2018 (UTC) Interesting Facts...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. QD'd as copyright violation --Auntof6 (talk) 02:09, 15 April 2018 (UTC) DJ13SA (Tshepo Makhubela)...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Copyright violationKansan (talk) 05:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC) Disadvantages of internet...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Quickly deleted as copyright violation. Operator873talkconnect 19:31, 13 January 2021 (UTC) Chucklevision...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. QD'd as a copyright violation. Vermont (talk) 12:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC) Subsidized (edit...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Quickly deleted as copyright violation, which we cannot permit to keep --IWI (talk) 14:12, 27 July...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Copyright violation, deleted G12. Vermont (talk) 23:52, 6 February 2019 (UTC) Ronald...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Useless now that Wikipedia:Copyright problems has been redirected to WP:AN. Just mark for speedy deletion....
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Quickly deleted as copyright violation --Auntof6 (talk) 04:02, 22 November 2022 (UTC) Leon Fontaine...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Quickly deleted as copyright violation --Auntof6 (talk) 05:22, 22 October 2022 (UTC) Ahmed Al Hosani...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Quickly, as a copyright violation. Chenzw Talk 01:53, 15 June 2013 (UTC) Durability (edit ·...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy Delete. Copyright violation: Heart Murmurs; National Center for Biotechnology Information...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Quick deleted as copyright violation. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:48, 11 January 2014 (UTC) Xavier Lust (edit...
Click to read more »deletion was to Delete. The article was quickly deleted as it was a copyright violation. --Ferien (talk) 18:24, 9 May 2021 (UTC) Akumaizer 3 (edit ·...
Click to read more »Quéniaux (en) Coonley House (en) Criminal justice reform (en) Criticism of copyright (en) Cryptomeria (en) Culture of the United States (en, currently redirected...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Copyright violation.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 21:55, 28 May 2023 (UTC) Junior Tomlin...
Click to read more »Future recreation of the same/similar/related articles should be taken as copyright violations (since no attribution was done) and dealt with as necessary...
Click to read more »non-free images (images uploaded to Wikipedia without the permission of the copyright owner, or under licenses that do not permit commercial use) on your user...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. as a copyright violation (Non-administrator observation) JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP....
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Deleted as a copyright violation by Macdonald-ross; looking at the section below, it would probably...
Click to read more »deletion was to Delete. Early close, copy of Katie Perry song lyrics is a copyright violationPeterdownunder (talk) 07:50, 9 April 2020 (UTC) I kissed a girl...
Click to read more »guideline and others will help you. You may want to ask someone you respect who has not edited the article for an neutral opinion. Wikipedia:Copyrights...
Click to read more »checked but I'm willing to bet that text directly from the source is copyrighted Normandy 13:06, 2 February 2012 (UTC) According to this it is not, and...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Delete. This article was largely a copyright violation and a hoax. I deleted the article as such and am closing this...
Click to read more »of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy deleted by me as a copyright violation. It was a blatant copy-paste from another website - Griff (talk)...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. QD'd as copyright violation. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:43, 10 January 2025 (UTC) Facts about the...
Click to read more »edit is entirely unattributed copy from [1] and needs to be deleted as a copyright violation. -- asilvering (talk) 20:28, 3 February 2025 (UTC) Delete Deletion...
Click to read more »made up of two lengthy quotes, which is concerning for a possibility of copyright infringment. Osiris (talk) 21:38, 3 December 2011 (UTC) Osiris (talk)...
Click to read more »400-500 million people, real reach: no idea. Originally listed at QD G12 (copyright), I have not found the page it is copied from. In contrast my last nomination...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. QD'd as copyright violation. Tuscan Ant (talk) 07:36, 19 January 2025 (UTC) Basel Al-Haroon...
Click to read more »buttercup cardboard • carefree • caretaker • clockwork • commonsense • copyright • cupboard daylight • downfall ear-ring • earthwork • evergreen • everybody...
Click to read more »files to remain there if they violate copyright in the US, the image is tagged there as likely violating copyright in other jurisdictions, and is also tagged...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. It's also a copyright violation of https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19880521-0...
Click to read more »doubt a list like this has the "height of invention" to be subject to copyright, so probably no G12. --Eptalon (talk) 20:35, 17 October 2010 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »Roads's lyrics (derivative work based on copyrighted material, so we might consider deleting it for being a copyright violation as well). Ahmadtalk 16:45,...
Click to read more »on. Do not copy and paste sentences from English Wikipedia: this is a copyright violation, but you can rephrase or even translate French Wikipedia (with...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. QD as copyright violation by Griffinofwales. Tuscan Ant (talk) 19:49, 23 January 2025...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Delete. Article was quickly deleted as copyright violation. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:25, 11 August 2013 (UTC) Hedge fund (edit...
Click to read more »where a image does better than words ever could, and if the image is copyrighted, as our rules/policies currently stand, you're out of luck. I agree with...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Quick delete Copyvio. While they do point to the copyrighted source they copied this from, that in no way changes the fact that it...
Click to read more »not) as advertising, but I am pretty certain that it is deletable as a copyright violation. Chenzw Talk 06:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC) Things to consider...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. as a copyright violation Lauryn Dirty little secrets 17:10, 12 May 2010 (UTC) Bikicsunáj...
Click to read more »2113853211 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: May be copyright violation. Android 2113853211 (talk) 07:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »WITHDRAWN: non-admin close - Editors fixed it and took it out of violation of copyrightThanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 18:01, 8 April...
Click to read more »non-English text in userspace, unless it is something like attack language or a copyright violation. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:15, 27 October 2015 (UTC) User:The Wiki...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy Deleted due to copyright issues. -DJSasso (talk) 21:23, 8 June 2010 (UTC) Tiny Rascal Gang (edit...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:43, 26 June 2012 (UTC) An IP removed the RfD template and added copyright violation text from here. --weltforce (talk) 09:52, 28 June 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »for image uploads. If no image is found there, get one. Find suitable copyrights and then upload it. Commons is made specially for images, and just because...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Copyright violation with no evidence of fair use or attribution. EhJJTALK 01:08...
Click to read more »It was said that the article was 'too close' to other texts (whether copyrighted or not doesn't matter here), so I think it's best to delete the article...
Click to read more »restricted by laws pertaining to personality rights, independent from their copyright status. Before using these types of content, please ensure that you have...
Click to read more »after a period of time. Please do not put inappropriate things like copyrighted material, swearing, or other attacks in the sandbox. These kinds of changes...
Click to read more »A lot of the article is copied from several places, which brings the copyright concerns. Other than that, the writing sounds like original research....
Click to read more »and the article is in need of cleanup and wikifying (and checking for copyright issues.. nothing obvious out there, but could exist), it seems a valid...
Click to read more »{{subst:uw-create3}} {{subst:uw-create4}} {{subst:uw-create4im}} Breach of copyright {{subst:uw-copyright1}} {{subst:uw-copyright2}} Not applying the Manual...
Click to read more »changed and redistributed at will by the community. Do not infringe on copyright or submit work licensed in a way incompatible with the GFDL. Shortcut...
Click to read more »material on their pages is copyright. The copyright breaches are from many websites - that doesn't make the breach of copyright any better. The editor has...
Click to read more »theme feminism and folklore.* The article must not have any problems with copyright, notability, plagiarism or sourcing. The article must be written in Simple...
Click to read more »numbers Images Layout Lead section Linking Lists Wikimedia Foundation List of policies Licensing and copyright Privacy Category: Policies / Guidelines...
Click to read more »- If this is a yes, we need to re-work the artice to solve possible copyright issues. Eptalon (talk) 22:25, 8 December 2012 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »Notability Sources Content End Live Help Chat Your article must not violate copyright. As a general rule, never copy and paste text from other websites. There...
Click to read more »Razorflame 13:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC) No country with copyright laws would object to simple.wiki using copyrighted images as it is a non-profit organisation. It...
Click to read more »Compound: cardboard • carefree • caretaker • clockwork • commonsense • copyright • cupboard Endings: carter • clothier • clothing • cooker • cooked • cooking...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not notable, possibly a copyright violation? MrMeAndMrMeTalk 17:30, 21 April 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »Receptie123 (talk) 17:19, 2 October 2012 (UTC) Delete. Fairly obvious copyright infraction. Should be deleted and the editor warned. Macdonald-ross (talk)...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Unused. This is supposed to be a copyright message-box tag for files. Since we don't have files here, it's pretty...
Click to read more »agreed it's not GNU-compliant, then I'll delete it now No sense in keeping copyright problems around. Osiris (talk) 10:25, 17 June 2012 (UTC) Hari Baba Ashram...
Click to read more »editorial approach (neutral point of view); as well as the Wikipedia copyright policy. All editors are expected to stick closely to these policies when...
Click to read more »without the permission of the copyright holder. Many sources, including websites found on the Internet, are copyrighted. I am afraid Wikipedia cannot...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Possible copyvio, not cc says "Copyright 1963, 1966 & 1968" TheAnnoymousUser (talk) 16:32, 29 June 2012 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »delete it. Could even claim G12 as someone has had to have said that in a copyright protected work.. --Creol(talk) 16:44, 4 April 2013 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »rest is not copyrightable as it is standard industrial design, not an artistic work. The Nintendo logo itself is possibly not copyrightable either as it...
Click to read more »as merging. Speedy Delete I found the source of the article. The only copyright I could find suggests that it isn't compatible with our licenses, so the...
Click to read more »a direct copy/paste from an unacknowledged source, and a violation of copyright. Also, it is deeply dependent on a prior knowledge of that faith, and...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Wherever you work, do NOT copy things from other websites. Copyright violations will be deleted. MathXplore (talk) 03:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »to apparent lack of understanding of copyright, as shown on candidate's recent RFA on EN. Aside from the copyright issues, one thing that jumps out is...
Click to read more »best. I have a question, do you feel comfortable with GFDL and other copyright issues? Have you done much work with it? Best, NonvocalScream (talk) 20:58...
Click to read more »may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator. Delete as Copyright violation of http://madisonbaezmusic.com This is a word for word copy...
Click to read more »Music • Radio • Sports • Theater • Travel • Television Government and Law Copyright • Defence • Economics (trade and business) • Government • Human rights...
Click to read more »proper training in copyright law so that I am able to advise teachers on their legal obligations under the copyright laws. Copyright is an issue that has...
Click to read more »{{PD-shape}}. Never use copyrighted materials such as creatively designed logo per the Wikipedia:Non-free content policy. The copyright status of an image...
Click to read more »November 2021 (UTC) Delete it's the list not the article. It probably has copyright violations. --Lecz Ka (talk) 08:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »biography that is also on their MySpace page, so there are certainly some copyright issues to consider also. Osiris (talk) 01:36, 25 July 2013 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »requirements. MediaWiki:Wikimedia-copyright MediaWiki:Wikimedia-copyright Hopefully you've all noticed the new copyright notices. Unfortunately, the language...
Click to read more »"Created and written by Michael Power, 2019 ®". I presume they intended to copyright it, and instead put the registered trademark symbol, both of which mean...
Click to read more »request N1TH Music has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copyright violation, unsimplifiable topic N1TH Music (talk) 11:57, 27 August 2022...
Click to read more »15:40, 4 September 2020 (UTC) Quick Delete as hoax and mildly edited copyright violation from here. Naddruf (talk) 16:06, 5 September 2020 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »article should not have links to websites that post content violating any copyrights, such as listing song lyrics without proper notice. However, there is...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Quick delete Possible copyright violation, WP:G12. 🌙 Raayaan9911 Ramadan Kareem! 01:31, 27 March 2025...
Click to read more »IP that resolves to the region. My basic question (aside from possible copyright issues is how encyclopedic this is.--Eptalon (talk) 21:29, 18 May 2011...
Click to read more »its sentences and paragraphs. I was taking pride in riding our pedia of copyright violations. They should not be created, and most certainly not restored...
Click to read more »no evidence of acknowledgement, and no evidence of its being free of copyright. That makes it totally unsuitable. Delete. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:49...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Copyright violation and unreferenced. I founded it Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 11:48...
Click to read more »QD:A4 - Does not assert notability, copy paste from MIT publication (copyright past) with no sign of simplification per WP:SNOW fr33kman talk 20:47,...
Click to read more »no editorial reason to keep; When the WMF attorney asks us to remove copyright violations. The rest can be deleted in accordance with local policy and...
Click to read more »at the bottom it says "all material on this website is protected by copyright". But not all of it is taken from that site. It reads like an essay and...
Click to read more »Templates included in this request are: Template:Attribution - related to copyright for files Template:BibleGateway (KJV) and its doc page Template:Canada...
Click to read more »references on an original research article, served with a side of possible copyright. 💠Ely - Talk💠 09:30, 22 December 2021 (UTC) Quick delete copyvio from...
Click to read more »Allmusic search engine. To find ownership information on song texts copyrighted in the US, the ASCAP ACE Title Search and BMI Repertoire Search utilities...
Click to read more »POV fork from the English Wikipedia. My guess is it probably includes copyright or GFDL violations in the copy and pasting as well. Please discuss this...
Click to read more »29 November 2016 (UTC) Delete. Does not show notability, synthesis, copyright violation. Rus793 (talk) 17:09, 29 November 2016 (UTC) @Rus793: If you...
Click to read more »es:Wikipedia:Consultas de borrado/Jorge Roig , Jr. - although mostly for copyright reasons. Osiris (talk) 14:17, 1 April 2013 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »can NOT be copyrighted as clarifing States Laws. In the meantime, I will report to Voice of America that her all materials are Copyrighted exclusively...
Click to read more »things at Commons, you have to be the copyright holder or have and provide documented permission from the copyright holder, and you upload them under a...
Click to read more »delete and clean the sections of an article causing a problem, such as copyright violations. This will allow for editors in the long-term to improve the...
Click to read more »really, really similar to the article, to the point this is probably a copyright violation. Ravensfire (talk) 22:24, 2 March 2025 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Questionable copyright status, parts taken from encyc.org, which seems to be running with a Creative...
Click to read more »multiple blocks and second chances on En:wp for adding and uploading copyrighted material and each time claimed she was innocent and that someone else...
Click to read more »Voices of the Trojan War. Great article but again I suspect it is either a copyright violation or original reseach Please discuss this deletion below, but...
Click to read more »complexity ? (such as copyright, COI, original research). I would like to note that the author is blocked from enwiki per copyright violations at the draft...
Click to read more »licensing requirements: Text to which you hold the copyright: When you submit text to which you hold the copyright, you agree to license it under: Creative Commons...
Click to read more »-- Creol(talk) 11:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC) As we tend to get a lot of copyright complaints on articles based on En:wp pages and the entire matter is a...
Click to read more »for deletion was to Delete. Since this version was copypasted from copyrighted site, there really was no oother opton that to delete. Note though, that...
Click to read more »references, isn't written from a neutral point of view, and is possibly a copyright violation. Not an article suitable for an encyclopedia. J991 17:31, 22...
Click to read more »{{subst:uw-create3}} {{subst:uw-create4}} {{subst:uw-create4im}} Breach of copyright {{subst:uw-copyright1}} {{subst:uw-copyright2}} Not applying the Manual...
Click to read more »article and check the copyright status of every image before distributing it, otherwise they will be in trouble for copyright infringement. As we have...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I suspect this is either a copyright violation or original reseach. Please discuss this deletion below, but...
Click to read more »numbers Images Layout Lead section Linking Lists Wikimedia Foundation List of policies Licensing and copyright Privacy Category: Policies / Guidelines...
Click to read more »images through Wikimedia Commons. This means that they meet all relevant copyright laws. Some other Wikipedias, notably English Wikipedia have other rules...
Click to read more »this is a copy-paste from an unacknowledged source, and hence probable copyright infringement. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:42, 25 June 2014 (UTC) Now keep...
Click to read more »Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:19, 9 January 2021 (UTC) Found the source of the copyright violation and tagged for G12. --IWI (talk) 16:54, 9 January 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Racepacket (talk) 12:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC) Delete. unwikified, looks like copyright vio and notability unsupported. Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:25, 16 January...
Click to read more »no editorial reason to keep; When the WMF attorney asks us to remove copyright violations. The rest can be deleted in accordance with local policy and...
Click to read more »discussing ways to make enforcement of copyrights more practical. One proposal currently being discussed is that the copyright owner files a lawsuit and give...
Click to read more »for A3. I've just added the attribution template so this is no longer a copyright violation. Yes, further simplification should be done, but I see no reason...
Click to read more »02:20, 17 September 2022 (UTC) Hello everyone. After we have noticed more copyright violations recently (with some going back nearly a year) I thought about...
Click to read more »articles. Granted the editor is busy, but the articles can not exist as copyright violations. The editor should have asked for deletion so that he could...
Click to read more »21:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC) Tagged as a copyright violation. Majorly (hot!) 12:59, 17 April 2007 (UTC) Once copyright information was removed, the article...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Quick delete Since I nominated for QD G12 (copyright violation), and the page remains in the same status, RFD may not be needed...
Click to read more »Lacks notability, and reads like an advert or trade blurb. Maybe also copyright issues. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:36, 14 March 2012 (UTC) Weak delete....
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notable?, May also has Copyright based issues based on EN Cactus🌵 spiky ツ 07:55, 1 April 2025 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »demonstration of the practice that occurred. I also feel this is close to a copyright violation; the wording from the article is almost essentially the wording...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete, copyright violation. Copied from https://www.facebook.com/OtterbourneBrass/about/...
Click to read more »smaller community did not have to waste time checking out the licenses and copyright status of every image. --Bärliner 22:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC) It's just...
Click to read more »archives with no response, along with a few extra things I thought of: Copyrights - no point sorting it out if it has to be deleted anyway Expansion - unfortunately...
Click to read more »Earwig's copyright violation detector. Is there an equivalent tool for the Simple English Wikipedia where I can check new articles for copyright violations...
Click to read more »deleted and recreated multiple times on English Wikipedia [1]. First as a copyright violation, then at en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumar J. Doctor...
Click to read more »his work. More importantly, this should be quickly deleted under G12 (copyright violation). It is a word-for-word copy (including grammar errors) of http://www...
Click to read more »lack of citations on the article is a problem that may include potential copyright issues so on that basis I support deletion. I note that this would be...
Click to read more »(talk) 04:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC) Every article is not feasible. Given copyright issues, articles on books, albums, television series, movies, video games...
Click to read more »something similar on the talk page for the article to deal with potential copyright complaints as well as for comparing the two articles to see how well it...
Click to read more »anything copyrightable there. Of course, you'd have to format it. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:02, 30 September 2021 (UTC) I don't think that's copyrightable per c:COM:TOO...
Click to read more »19:06, 28 October 2008 (UTC) One of the points we get quite often is copyright complaints from Enwp copy/pastes (with or without simplification). It...
Click to read more »sourced and cleaned up, but definitely not deleted, unless we find it is a copyright violation or direct copy from enwiki. --Ferien (talk) 10:32, 10 July 2021...
Click to read more »article for the foundation that awards the prize a short while ago (as copyright violation, IIRC). Anyway: searching on google, I get articles for the...
Click to read more »trying to upload a cover of a copyrighted photo of a cover. However, you can't upload it to the commons because it is copyrighted, and you can't upload it...
Click to read more »it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator. Delete Copyright violation (QD:G12): https://books.google.com/books...
Click to read more »articles that are considered patent nonsense, blatant advertising, or copyright infringement. I've been here since May, 2006 and I've accumulated over...
Click to read more »(possibility). Thousands of aticle lack images here (mostly logos which hold copyright issues) but the article can be good on itself so tagging those good article...
Click to read more »the file's country of origin. See Commons:Licensing for information on copyright law in whatever country this may be (is it Japanese?). Osiris (talk) 14:46...
Click to read more »each line. (Only part of the lyrics are listed, to keep them short, per copyright laws limiting to 10%, or prohibiting the display of an entire performable...
Click to read more »good portion. The one before that in April caused some problems with copyright violations and copying from the English Wikipedia, but their teacher/supervisor...
Click to read more »countries, but as much as I think there should be an image on every page, copyright is an area where I don't have the legal expertise. Let's leave it to the...
Click to read more »collection (and linked to collect on simp:wikt) and linked licencing to copyrights. -- Creol(talk) 06:37, 6 November 2007 (UTC) Hello, I am somewhat new...
Click to read more »professional looking font. I think we'll stick with serif, and preferably non-copyrighted ones. {{Sonia|talk|en}} 09:37, 21 June 2010 (UTC) ┌─────────────────────────────────┘...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:45, 19 June 2012 (UTC) We can cope. As usual, copyright violations generally stick out a mile (or kilometer) because they aren't...
Click to read more »uploading. In fact, the licenses/copyright tags dropdown is empty, making it hard or impossible to comply with copyright requirements during upload itself...
Click to read more »Ogden died in 1957, so in countries where copyright is 70 years after the author's death, his copyright has not yet expired. The list was deleted from...
Click to read more »one go on a personality who is difficult to assess. Too great a risk of copyright vio, or of connection between posting editor and the subject of the bio...
Click to read more »written and created by Charles Schulz (who died in the year 2000), but is copyright "© 2012 United Feature Syndicate, Inc". Assuming Stewie refers to the...
Click to read more »18:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC) Comment. Originally this appeared to be a copyright violation. But the free use statement seems to negate that: "All of the...
Click to read more »judgment. Attribution is a legal requirement to comply with En Wikipedia's copyright license. Once the starting point is selected, it is up to the editor to...
Click to read more »the edit history will have to be posted on the talk page because of copyright issues.--Werdan7T @ 01:25, 22 July 2007 (UTC) Yes, I followed the process...
Click to read more »tools. EhJJTALK 18:53, 18 June 2010 (UTC) You call a user who added a copyright violation a scant two months ago "know[ing] what she's doing"? Codedon...
Click to read more »attribution today (I hope! Time allowing!) I have cautioned the students about copyright violations, so I hope we don't have any today. I will review the pages...
Click to read more »theme of Feminism or Folklore. ✅ The article must not be an Orphan. ✅ No copyright violations; proper references required. 🥇 1st prize: 300 USD 🥈 2nd prize:...
Click to read more »the reason: Wikipedia is not a guide, also, the article looks like a copyright violation. —SEPTActaMTA8235— (t — c — l) 16:48, 2 May 2011 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) @MathXplore: I don't think that speeches are copyrighted, if that speech was copyrighted it would already be in the public domain by now, but...
Click to read more »not attributed, I have no idea which version it was taken from, is it a copyright violation? I editied the article and did not know it was copied from EN...
Click to read more »2021 (UTC) @Darkfrog24 - BTW I just tagged that article for QD Breaking copyright with a 96.6% violation. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 16:42, 1...
Click to read more »Unsourced. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:23, 12 May 2023 (UTC) Quick delete G12: copyright violation of https://www.cnn.com/2015/04/01/europe/anne-frank-date-of-death...
Click to read more »may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep - Copyright is a serious matter and editors should always attribute content copied...
Click to read more »more of a problem as only free images can be used. Most video games are copyrighted and there are no free images available. -- Creol(talk) 15:29, 21 January...
Click to read more »image uploading, I would like to suggest disallowing fair use of others' copyrighted images.--Jusjih 15:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC) Hello, SimpleWP has an article...
Click to read more »MC8) 07:57, 27 May 2009 (UTC) Can I get an admin to swing by Wikipedia:Copyright problems and deal with (delete) the article I posted there? Thanks. --Philosopher Let...
Click to read more »Image:Wiki.png is marked as being GFDL, when it's explicitly not (it's copyrighted to the Wikimedia Foundation). 86.132.121.26 18:20, 5 May 2006 (UTC) Done...
Click to read more »as needed as well as the default state. (also includes turning off the copyright/save/sign your post sections all in one table for easy access)-- Creol(talk)...
Click to read more »notable; another wiki and home pages are not acceptable sources; possible copyright infringement of http://mujeeb-rahman.yolasite.com/ Rus793 (talk) 14:24...
Click to read more »to use the Huffington Post article's fascinating information without copyright infringement.[2http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/24/banned-baby-names_n_5134075...
Click to read more »a second admin has to do the deleting in cases like this. You cannot copyright a single sentence, therefore nothing he did violated WP:COPY if you weren't...
Click to read more »Physics • Statistics • Zoology (study of animals) Government and law Copyright • Defense • Economics (trade and business) • Government • Human rights...
Click to read more »but I'm happy to do it) can copy/paste them over with links back for copyright) If people are willing to wait a day or two we can get consensus and I...
Click to read more »deleted. Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 18:56, 26 April 2011 (UTC) Delete. Possible copyright violation. Many schools have nearly identical text. --The Three Headed...
Click to read more »of copyright infringement though. -- Creol(talk) 21:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC) I've already notifiied Scorpion that is isn't in any way a copyright infringement...
Click to read more »the project by discouraging bad behaviours such as disruption, warring, copyright, vandalism etc. I'd not like to use a template against a good faith editor...
Click to read more »(they can use the same images) and also there's no need to worry about copyright violations. All images must now come from Wikimedia Commons, see our image...
Click to read more »kept). --Rory096 08:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC) Take a look at Wikipedia:Copyrights. Archer7 - talk 17:11, 20 November 2006 (UTC) I doubt if we have a book...
Click to read more »dynamic IP addys and that means it's impossible to tell who owns the copyright to any given edit (since the person using the IP changes daily/hourly...
Click to read more »Bionlpumass (talk • changes) at 16:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC). Speedy Delete. Copyright violation: National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National...
Click to read more »advice? -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 07:55, 29 January 2010 (UTC) Twas a copyright violation, now gone. Thanks for the heads-up. :) Lauryn Ashby (d) 09:28...
Click to read more »gone gone, such as personally identifying information, libel, or severe copyright violations. In such cases, merely selectively deleting the diffs isn't...
Click to read more »Wikipedia, which is allowed because the content is licensed under a public copyright license. The page should say it's from Wikipedia, but the message can...
Click to read more »A few days ago, someone asked me if there was Twinkle on this wiki. I told him there wasn't as Twinkle isn't configured for this wiki. Using it will only...
Click to read more »the ones for Olympics) or things like works from YYYY will have their copyright expire (which you are just going to be able to add to year articles forever)...
Click to read more »that he has ported over here from the English Wikipedia including a few copyright violations, combined with the porn site link on his userpage may be grounds...
Click to read more »upload them at Wikimedia Commons if they meet the requirements as far as copyright and free use. This page gives some detail about what is allowed. --Auntof6...
Click to read more »Non-notable as far as I can find. was deleted 3 times on en. Twice for copyright and once through Afd as self-promotion. I think this is also a case of...
Click to read more »in and I foolishly volunteered. I discovered many problems, including copyright, POV, and sources that did not support the text. She felt that her academic...
Click to read more »December 2021 (UTC) Then how is it on en-wiki? (I'm not an expert on copyright tbh) 💠Ely - Talk💠 13:31, 18 December 2021 (UTC) @Elytrian It's used...
Click to read more »will try to keep on top of all of their edits. I am mainly worried about copyright violation and correct attribution, but that has not been a significant...
Click to read more »18:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC) It seems to have been deleted at [2] as a copyright violation. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:25, 25 January 2018 (UTC) Yeah that wasn't...
Click to read more »site. The site includes resources and position statements on access, copyright, censorship, intermediary liability, and privacy. The site explains how...
Click to read more »revisions you are shown are copyvios, follow the instructions on Wikipedia:Copyright problems. --Ferien (talk) 22:36, 24 November 2022 (UTC) It's hard to believe...
Click to read more »does that banner contain the actual Nickelodeon logo? If so, Is it a copyright violation? I do appreciate the effort you put into the Wikiproject, but...
Click to read more »better. Uploading an image to Commons isn't hard, and sorting out the copyrights sounds tough, but it isn't. So whenever possible, get an image. However...
Click to read more »point of view • Verifiability Citing sources • What Wikipedia is not Copyrights • Image use policy Spam • Vandalism • Deletion policy The Community Assume...
Click to read more »example, with notability issues, but not with others such as vandalism or copyright violation). --Auntof6 (talk) 23:57, 17 October 2015 (UTC) Oppose. This...
Click to read more »on Commons (which there often isn't, because album cover art is often copyrighted), they can host local images. We don't host local images, however, so...
Click to read more »year the song was written, the year it was released, the year it was copyrighted, or what.--Auntof6 (talk) 09:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC) Being simple doesn't...
Click to read more »(subst:'d) to attribute the original authors and ensure there are no copyright issues. -- Creol(talk) 05:12, 20 September 2008 (UTC) Cool, will clean...
Click to read more »WikiProject Biology and sub-projects #wpcci – English Wikipedia Contributor copyright investigations #wpengineering – English Wikipedia WikiProject Engineering...
Click to read more »exception copyvio as that can be a documented copy/paste violation of copyrighted material which isn't likely to be challenged What constitutes an attack...
Click to read more »license and therefore are copyright by their sender, and should not be pasted onto the website in a way that breaches copyright law. If you've added and...
Click to read more »Instagram, etc.) This may actually be a case of paid editing and/or copyright issues. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his)...
Click to read more »pre-release publicity articles and interviews. Image is almost certainly a copyright violation, but already tagged for permission on commons and will be deleted...
Click to read more »simplification. Or, under one interpretation of G12, it's a speedy delete due to copyright violation. Our deletion policy says it should be brought here for discussion...
Click to read more »files to remain there if they violate copyright in the US, the image is tagged there as likely violating copyright in other jurisdictions, and is also tagged...
Click to read more »intro looked pretty much like a copy of Everybodywiki, so we might have a copyright issues as well. If the article is recreated, plese loo that it is ont...
Click to read more »02:06, 16 Dec 2004 Netoholic deleted "Computability theory" (restore) (copyright violation copied verbatim from various online dictionaries) 20:40, 15...
Click to read more »cannot be moved.--Eptalon (talk) 09:59, 8 June 2008 (UTC) Wikipedia:Image copyright tags (change · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) We don't...
Click to read more »content dispute, I can think of two reasons. One: To remove vandalism, copyrighted info, and attacks (defamation) on living people. Two: To make minor changes...
Click to read more »appropriate. The user page will have to go however as it is technically a copyright violation of enWP and not attributed under GFDL, unless it is their intention...
Click to read more »ismt) then it does not matter how many other sites are violating that copyright. It is against a core value of all of wikipedia (and wikimedia and the...
Click to read more »Keep There's no longer enough content to be violating copyright. It's only two sentences but this is fine for a stub; we have thousands...
Click to read more »article is posted again with the copyright content, it should be deleted for G12. If it is recreated without the copyright content, and we still want to...
Click to read more »November 2018 (UTC) He does technically own copyright (CC-BY-SA 3.0) to what he writes in articles, and owns copyright on the images that he hasn't released...
Click to read more »2015 (UTC) 1st thing, there is no copyright violation at all. You can't simply accuse someone of violating copyrights without giving evidence of your accusation...
Click to read more »albeit for what looks like the wrong reasons. If he continues to create copyright violations/spam, then he'll be blocked. Lauryn Dirty little secrets 03:07...
Click to read more »women, feminism, and LGBTQ. The article must not have any problems with copyright, notability, plagiarism or sourcing. The article must be written in Simple...
Click to read more »Also, the text is from here: gaiaonline.com, I'm not sure about the copyright status, but looks like copyvio to me. --Rimshot 12:00, 13 February 2007...
Click to read more »that he is really notable. Also, it seems to be a copyright violation from somewhere (the copyright tag is still on the page). There isn't really a big...
Click to read more »https://www.loc.gov/publish/pcn/faqs/ "All works submitted to the Copyright Office to meet copyright obligations are also reviewed by Library of Congress selection...
Click to read more »sockpuppetry and commons for copyright infringement, and they have created multiple pages recently that infringe on copyright laws after being warned not...
Click to read more »Since this does not fall under fair use, I suggest speedy deleting for copyright violation or whatever the Simple English equivalent to that is. RajanD100...
Click to read more »for a number of reasons including sock puppetry, disruptive editing, copyright violations, and harassment". It is difficult to imagine more serious findings...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete - I have removed the Youtube links for potential copyright issues. Does not meet this guideline "Has been the subject of a several...
Click to read more »this page about? To me, it's probably just a test of wiki-syntax on copyrighted material. << S O M E G A D G E T G E E K >> (talk) 16:32, 21 February...
Click to read more »user. He's being purely disruptive: edit-warring, repeatedly inserting copyright violations, removing attribution templates, making personal attacks and...
Click to read more »August 2011 (UTC) You can't copyright a single sentence so don't need to be attributed. In order to be able to apply copyright there has to be originality...
Click to read more »Wikipedia, en:User:GenOrl has been found to have been pasting in copies of copyrighted text, please see the thread on the admin noticeboard. You may want to...
Click to read more »other people's work from web pages or books and add it to Wikipedia. Read Copyright before adding content. Keeping it Simple. This Wikipedia needs to written...
Click to read more »en:Carlo Biotti. Nothing he writes can be trusted and he often pastes copyright material verbatim into articles. He is particularly obsessed with creating...
Click to read more »which support the removal of content in some circumstances are Wikipedia:Copyright, Wikipedia:Vandalism, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, and the core policies...
Click to read more »the only reference. The books are nothing more than reprints of out of copyright sources, with spelling errors from the title page on forward (For example...
Click to read more »whose now I own Full Legal Rights! Copy of my claim can be found on Copyright.gov Case #1-4710448981 https://www.flickr.com/photos/58711927@N04/335...
Click to read more »enough to pick the right meaning for some words. Should they be considered copyright violations, given that they're not in the original language? I should...
Click to read more »suspect that it is from en.wikipedia. Not sure how we handle this type of copyright issues. Nunabas (talk) 17:43, 6 June 2019 (UTC) Yeah have been looking...
Click to read more »file' option from the toolbar. We don't like fair use images because copyrights are a real headache, and also when people redistribute our work (pretty...
Click to read more »Hello. Please can you hide this revision from the history as it is a copyright violation. Thanks. --Belwine (talk) 10:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC) Done...
Click to read more »disruptive editing, so the perp has come over here instead. Persistent copyright violations. No point in blocking the IPs, since it seems to jump every...
Click to read more »wiki and the editor who created this creates hoax articles and uploads copyrighted images there) IJReid (talk) 00:16, 22 March 2018 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: No encyclopedic tone, AI generated, contains copyrighted content. CosmLearner (talk) contribs 18:02, 10 October 2024 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »Subsequently, these were also uploaded to Miraheze commons, and deleted for copyrights violations. Besides that, the article is promotional and NPOV rules are...
Click to read more »clearly violates WP:FAKEARTICLE. There's also a potential concern regarding copyright, as the content resembles biographical information that could be copied...
Click to read more »Krishna chali london because it is not copyrighted. Akir333456 (talk) 14:13, 20 May 2018 (UTC) Not being copyrighted is not a reason to keep an article....
Click to read more »2013 (UTC) Resolved. By Eptalon. Chenzw Talk 14:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC) Copyright violation here, taken from here. Thanks, --Snow Blizzard 17:27, 13 May...
Click to read more »but my issue with that, as I mentioned above, is that it might be a copyright violation without attribution. Sadly, there are no votes on this one,...
Click to read more »a sock of the globally blocked User:Alec Smithson (hoaxes and serious copyright violations). More background here. The page was a verbatim copy of this...
Click to read more »inventory Intangible assets for example: goodwill, patents, trademarks, copyrights and computer programs Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:26, 24 August 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »article. Only (talk) 17:18, 24 February 2019 (UTC) I have removed the copyrighted content from the article. Vermont (talk) 19:26, 24 February 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »not sure what to do besides going and tagging them all QD for either copyright or from another project. Can an admin please advise me? The articles are...
Click to read more »be used as a sandbox, and by the user page content, it's clearly not copyrighted material, or anything that could get it deleted or the user blocked....
Click to read more »@2011-04-05T12:22:03Z and expires at 2011-04-12T12:22:03Z because "Creating copyright violations: and other unconstructive editing" (Account Creation Blocked...
Click to read more »at En wiki, and hence the editor's copyright was abolished. Its later appearance here was a violation of copyright because the editor did not acknowledge...
Click to read more »protected User:SimonMayer 04:44, 29 Feb 2004 Angela unprotected Wikipedia:Copyrights 18:03, 26 Feb 2004 Angela protected MediaWiki:Searchdisabled 18:03, 26...
Click to read more »article the topic of which is notable from keeping unless there is mass copyright violation of text within, since they are handled in further edits / discussed...
Click to read more »differences.)I want to be very careful to comply with the attribution and copyright requirements, so I include a permanent link to En Wikipedia whenever I...
Click to read more »[paper (PDF download)], copying of works with copyright, without the permission of those who hold the copyright is a criminal offense, in some countries....
Click to read more »timebomb... PM, disputes seem to come to me. Like here, NVS accused of copyright infringement; considering what I did with admin tools on en.wiki, that's...
Click to read more »websites where it's copied from? Then the article can be deleted as a copyright violation. --Ferien (talk) 17:15, 14 July 2021 (UTC) Actually maybe not...
Click to read more »Arbitration Capital punishment Civil and political rights Constitution Contract Copyright Court Damages Equity (law) Evidence (law) Freedom of speech Guilt (law)...
Click to read more »Regarding what Okanlawon said, it seems the articles in question violate copyright and should be deleted. - Huji reply 18:59, 17 August 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »direct translation would be a derivitive work (and therefore protected by copyright). But there's no hard evidence of that. The main issue is that it's made...
Click to read more »deletion.) Sju hav (talk) 11:41, 5 September 2017 (UTC) Please WP:REVDEL the copyright infringing revision of Knowledge University under WP:RD1. The content...
Click to read more »02:05, 1 January 2023 (UTC) Even if it were the same, then it'd be a copyright violation (i.e. G12), since the content is no longer published. It cannot...
Click to read more »Japanese Wikipedia where they routinely RFD articles because someone added copyrighted text to the article.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:26, 26 July 2009 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »articles, lack of criteria when creating articles, massive uploading of copyrighted images as own work. I suggest to follow this user closely as he is very...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard 4 Wikipedia:Citing sources (Policy) 1 Wikipedia:Copyrights (Policy) 1 Wikipedia:Edit lock (1 IP) 4 Wikipedia:Glossary 1 Wikipedia:How...
Click to read more »think it'd be best if we just had one category for all these cross-wiki copyright violations. The templates themselves are a bit of a problem—they sort...
Click to read more »I think I have already pointed it out on IRC, but some edits Goblinbot reverts are not clear cases of vandalism. Another such case occurred just now. diffs...
Click to read more »which they sing when each child is taken away, but I think that may be a copyright violation). I have put all of the information in those articles (apart...
Click to read more »work as an administrator, upholding policies such as the one on image copyright, but in the gentlest way. The reason my vote may not count (and I fully...
Click to read more »of Biesme." However, the reference for that "cannot be displayed for copyright reasons." -- Auntof6 (talk) 17:02, 14 January 2023 (UTC) Comment: There...
Click to read more »2012 (UTC) Q: An editor has tagged a new article for quick deletion as a copyright violation, giving a link to a website from where the article has been...
Click to read more »article on a website about the boxer, the website says the entire page is copyrighted. So is the picture a copyvio? (Referring to This Website ) --Thegooduser...
Click to read more »unique cultural ramifications (I know that Bavaria is known for owning the copyright to Mein Kampf and for never allowing permission to reprint it so there...
Click to read more »111.235.50 has been around awhile and has been repeatedly blocked for copyright violations (many of which are still up on the site, I'm going to go through...
Click to read more »3 March 2020 (UTC) Doesn't require G12 when you can just remove the copyright violation. -DJSasso (talk) 12:27, 4 March 2020 (UTC) I was thinking this...
Click to read more »Quick delete A1 This page as little-to-no meaning (without the likely copyrighted photo I removed). ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 21:17, 1 April 2025 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »possible(I don't know if it is, but I think Tolkien still possesses a copyright). Also, the name is very misleading, possibly meaning places where middle-earth...
Click to read more »23:45, 29 Jan 2004 Angela blocked "The Undead" (Continuing to upload copyrighted text. Was warned. Alerady banned from the English and German Wikipedias...
Click to read more »site (talk • contribs) Support deletion. Images are most likely all copyrighted and not the work of the subject. I will ask for CU if enough data is...
Click to read more »no clear violation of Wikipedia's deletion policies (e.g., vandalism, copyright infringement) is evident. Also this article can be improved and expanded...
Click to read more »Image:Instant_ramen.jpg: This is an obvious copyright infringement. Those artworks are all copyrighted exclusively, so the copyright of this picture belongs to the...
Click to read more »like to use my experience as an m:OTRS volunteer to help clean up our copyright situation. Also, as I am an administrator on the English Wikipedia, I...
Click to read more »and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work...
Click to read more »Arbitration Capital punishment Civil and political rights Constitution Contract Copyright Court Damages Equity (law) Evidence (law) Freedom of speech Guilt (law)...
Click to read more »regarding copyright violations (we only have 2 levels of copyright warnings and I gave him the 2nd level). They are taking sentences from copyrighted books...
Click to read more »waffle that can be saved and even if it could I would assume it's all copyrighted anyway?, Better off being deleted and any editor in good standing can...
Click to read more »text is not actually copyrighted. Source can be found here). In the example above, the article text copied part of the copyrighted source directly, and...
Click to read more »applied in error. That AfD was closed as “creator has been blocked for copyright violations and this article is presumed copyvio,” which isn’t accurate...
Click to read more »creators are subject to more serious warnings. Anyone creating pages with copyright violations will also be subject to being warned more seriously than the...
Click to read more »puppetry. Nigos (talk · contribs) 07:13, 8 August 2019 (UTC) Quick delete: copyright infringement of https://metacademy.org/roadmaps/Prof.Kee/Decision_Stream...
Click to read more »someone you represent. Copyright How to copy text on Wikipedia, donate your text, or report unallowed use of your copyrighted work. Press and partnerships...
Click to read more »for the reason: Originally QD candidate (as a copyvio); This is not a copyright violation. I do however fail to see the encyclopedic notability of the...
Click to read more »cause all of sorts of problems for our readers whom may not understand copyright etc). This page has a lot of potential to be useful and helpful, –Davey2010Talk...
Click to read more »Orphan—it must have links to it from other articles. There should be no copyright violations or notability issues, and the article should have references...
Click to read more »about the lack of attribution than the copying over. That itself is a copyright issue. The secondary issue of a failure to change the wording is also...
Click to read more »cetera. Q: An editor has tagged a new article for quick deletion as a copyright violation, giving a link to a website from where the article has been...
Click to read more »Trigger Happy guy who started this via photo that I uploaded on commons as copyright violation (that he now retracted) might not be sufficienly happy...after...
Click to read more »started here. So actually most, if not all, of your page creations here are copyright violations. Please try and get the hang of things first before requesting...
Click to read more »Etamni | ✉ | ✓ 01:22, 4 December 2015 (UTC) Keep. I don't see any copyrighted, offensive or libelous content in this. The sandbox is a place for experimenting...
Click to read more »constructive edits about actresses and then are reverted for posting copyrighted information on "Angelina Jolie". The user is reported to VIP for violating...
Click to read more »deleted as a copyright violation. If indeed it was a copyright violation, it will not be restored; you are not allowed to upload copyrighted material to...
Click to read more »quality of content. I am familiar with Wikipedia's policies, including BLP, Copyright, Verifiability, and Notability, and I am committed to maintain these standards...
Click to read more »March 2024 (UTC) The importing over top was to give attribution. It was a copyright violation as it stood. That isn't actually the issue I was referring to...
Click to read more »March 2024 (UTC) The importing over top was to give attribution. It was a copyright violation as it stood. That isn't actually the issue I was referring to...
Click to read more »user before deletion promotional text I have none of it. violation of copyrights I have none of it.' BLP violations I have none of it.' and many more as...
Click to read more »articles.) Just because we give credit to English Wikipedia to avoid copyright concerns does not mean that independent editorial judgment and scholarly...
Click to read more »word="Copy" find="\b([cC])poy(ing)?\b" replace="$1opy$2"/> <Typo word="Copyright" find="\b([cC])opywrite\b" replace="$1opyright"/> <Typo word="Cordial"...
Click to read more »someone you represent. Copyright How to copy text on Wikipedia, donate your text, or report unallowed use of your copyrighted work. Press and partnerships...
Click to read more »someone you represent. Copyright How to copy text on Wikipedia, donate your text, or report unallowed use of your copyrighted work. Press and partnerships...
Click to read more »issues with the work here. Has been censured for repeatedly uploading copyrighted images at Commons. For these reasons, I oppose this nomination. Even...
Click to read more »someone you represent. Copyright How to copy text on Wikipedia, donate your text, or report unallowed use of your copyrighted work. Press and partnerships...
Click to read more »someone you represent. Copyright How to copy text on Wikipedia, donate your text, or report unallowed use of your copyrighted work. Press and partnerships...
Click to read more »(coordination) coorperation (cooperation) coorperation (corporation) copywrite (copyright - nb copywrite is valid for proofread) corosion (corrosion) corparate...
Click to read more »such as -> if the article is Meaningless or copied from another Place (Copyright issue), or if the subject does not claim notable, and if not written in...
Click to read more »page was copied from enwiki or G12 where you can see an article was a copyright violation. We don't have to use QD criteria to delete articles, that's...
Click to read more »years ago on the Cedars Sinai hospital staff page.It was flagged for copyright issues... Because it is about him and both Cedars and Dr. Kimchi are fine...
Click to read more »Folklore or Feminism.) The article must not be an Orphan. There should be no copyright violations and notability issues and the article should have proper references...
Click to read more »this Wikipedia. They are all following the policies and include zero copyrighted material. These include translations of the week, but I mainly simplify...
Click to read more »a quick reminder that WP:G12 exists for deletion of articles that are copyright violations. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:22, 3 September 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »generated by its content. As for copyright, the AIs are proprietary software and a thing they generate would be copyrighted by the company running the AI...
Click to read more »And deleted with G12 and G5 (Created by a blocked/banned/locked user, Copyright infringement). RiggedMint 09:09, 26 December 2023 (UTC) --- G11 reasons :...
Click to read more »Fnafpuppetmaster Programming language: JavaScript / Node.js Function: Copyright Description: This would monitor any new pages created to see if it has...
Click to read more »reason, I have blanked Wikipedia talk:Copyrights so that we have room to work together and change the copyright notices and attribution templates for...
Click to read more »rollbacks , articles , I am a profound user familiar and recognized with the copyrights and policies i have a lot of spare and free time and willing to dedicate...
Click to read more »after a period of time. Please do not put inappropriate things like copyrighted material, swearing, or other attacks in the sandbox. These kinds of changes...
Click to read more »otherwise. 2). "I have pasted from the NHS website to here." ... which is a Copyright violation and isn't allowed, 3). There was consensus here to delete the...
Click to read more »under copyright so I'll leave that for an admin to verify. As I don't see any license listed on that website, I think it's probably copyrighted and this...
Click to read more »material from another Wikipedia, you also need to give attribution for copyright purposes. Osiris (talk) 04:21, 17 September 2012 (UTC) For large translation...
Click to read more »no the newspaper did not write it, an editor did please attribute the copyrighted material to the author or just simply say "an editor wrote..." Done...
Click to read more »references myself, adding the information to a website, without breaking a copyright law and reffing back to the original ref or course, and then reffing that...
Click to read more »started here. So actually most, if not all, of your page creations here are copyright violations. Please try and get the hang of things first before requesting...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: This is a cut and paste job from here:[1]1.It's a copyright violation. 2. No reputable medical organizations including the World Health...
Click to read more »This is an article I wrote from scratch for enWP and imported here (as copyright holder). It has a couple of redlinks (which I will fix) but it is very...
Click to read more »coorperations->corporations copmetitors->competitors coputer->computer copywrite->copyright coridal->cordial cornmitted->committed corosion->corrosion corparate->corporate...
Click to read more »EhJJ writes about the CC license and the impact of a possible change of copyright policy on the Simple English Wikipedia. Shappy - Article 2 Shappy talks...
Click to read more »article, it needs to be credited, otherwise this will be deleted as a copyright violation otherwise this will be reverted to the way it was prior to your...
Click to read more »control convenient conversion cook cooked cooker cooking cool copper copy copyright cord cork corner correlation corrosion cost cotton cough country court...
Click to read more »at least one image. I know that may difficult in this case because of copyright, but it is usual to have something visual. A sidebar or infobox outlining...
Click to read more »so much for the info! ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 01:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC) Copyright law is interesting. For our purposes, with text, you can exactly copy...
Click to read more »don't have copyrights and attribution is not needed (special:diff/8974105). I would like to know which global/local policy or guidelines, copyright law can...
Click to read more »specific words or phrases, or you can browse through the book (although for copyright reasons the entire book is usually not available). Find this book at Karlsruhe...
Click to read more »not addressing or mentioning plagiarism verbatim, there is a policy on copyright and copying content from Wikipedia (whether it's the Simple English Wikipedia...
Click to read more »{{Section resolved|1=~~~~}}. For example see commons:Commons:Village pump/Copyright. For details, see commons:Template:Autoarchive_resolved_section. My SUL...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:BLP, Wikipedia:Copyright, Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Notability rules. For example, every nation will have different copyright/privacy rules...
Click to read more »dedicate to the legal issues of the constant copyright issues? Who here is qualified in international copyright law and willing to put in all the hours needed...
Click to read more »getting through all of these :) Thank you (sincerely) for finding these copyright violations and presenting the diffs/information in an easy way to process...
Click to read more »that the extent and length of the quotations raises the question of CV (copyright violation: most of the authors died less than 70 years ago). The second...
Click to read more »Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 20:19, 18 June 2025 (UTC) It depends on the copyright license under which you published the content on that wiki, and whether...
Click to read more »(which can be either legit or copyright violations), helping us save time. The goal is to reduce the rate of copyright violations by at least 10% among...
Click to read more »for Me? ~2025-32267-17 (talk) 17:02, 10 November 2025 (UTC) Not done copyright nonsense Plutus 💬 🎃 — Fortune favors the curious 02:11, 26 November...
Click to read more »Obviously Revdel is needed when a vandalism edit contains personal info, copyrighted information, grossly inappropriate content and just edits that appear...
Click to read more »used for The Super Mario Bros. Movie and I was wondering if this is a copyright issue. As far as I know, posters are not used on this Wikipedia due to...
Click to read more »allowed into Wikimedia Commons: File:Akon_City_construction_site.png (copyright expires in home country Senegal on 1 January 2144; There are 117 years...
Click to read more »well be another account of the users blocked. Editor is also uploading copyrighted images to commons and fighting policy there. Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk...
Click to read more »sported on his beret was his trademarked logo (registered trademark under copyright act 1999) and NOT one of the Indian Army. However, certain groups tried...
Click to read more »and paste. Throwing the whole "can AI's retain copyright" out, does the article itself have copyright issues from the content, especially close paraphrasing...
Click to read more »currency 3759 expertise 3760 stink 3761 void 3762 widespread 3763 greet 3764 copyright 3765 suspend 3766 boo 3767 clutch 3768 inquiry 3769 distinguish 3770 documentary...
Click to read more »possible libel. Eptalon (talk) 10:49, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Hello, there is a copyright violation at Observer states. The current text in the article is from...
Click to read more »article need to be hidden ?, It's complex totally agree but it's not copyright and it's not a Enwiki copypaste job (so therefore doesn't meet any QD...
Click to read more »was a copyright violation from here, could an admin RevDel it? Thanks Nobody (talk) 13:50, 4 December 2024 (UTC) Also this edit which is a copyright violation...
Click to read more »of page188.214.196.178 (talk) 16:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC) Description: Copyright issues188.214.196.178 (talk) 16:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC) 188.214.196.178...
Click to read more »Physics • Statistics • Zoology (study of animals) Government and law Copyright • Defense • Economics (trade and business) • Government • Human rights...
Click to read more »public domain by waiving all of their rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed...
Click to read more »we'd simply follow what they do. We'd let them hash out the rationale, copyright concerns etc and we'd use the image after enwiki has addressed all those...
Click to read more »albeit for what looks like the wrong reasons. If he continues to create copyright violations/spam, then he'll be blocked. Lauryn Dirty little secrets 03:07...
Click to read more »magazine, newspaper or another website without the permission of the copyright holder..." or whatever the case will be. I think this would be more beneficial...
Click to read more »(UTC) Edit summaries by Special:Contributions/~2025-37485-15 contain copyrighted lyrics from "All I Want for Christmas Is You". Please remove. Saroj (talk)...
Click to read more »Commons is a clean and simple solution. The benefit of being able to use a copyrighted image is very small. Eptalon (talk) 00:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC) I disagree...
Click to read more »important and covered by Communication), Zoology (covered by Biology), Copyright, Defense (simply a redirect to Military), Trade (covered by Economics)...
Click to read more »enwiki-translated articles, as it's harder to detect and also isn't necessarily copyrighted. --Ferien (talk) 22:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC) In the case of Baby shower...
Click to read more »English Wikipedia to Simple English Wikipedia. I’m a bit worried about the copyrights because I’m using the content, images, and sources from the English Wikipedia...
Click to read more »111.235.50 has been around awhile and has been repeatedly blocked for copyright violations (many of which are still up on the site, I'm going to go through...
Click to read more »extra steps such as revdel before deleting – for example – a page for copyright violations until said bug is fixed. Thank you for your attention. ✩ Dream...
Click to read more »after a period of time. Please do not put inappropriate things like copyrighted material, swearing, or other attacks in the sandbox. These kinds of changes...
Click to read more »after a period of time. Please do not put inappropriate things like copyrighted material, swearing, or other attacks in the sandbox. These kinds of changes...
Click to read more »references provided in the foreign-language article. You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing...
Click to read more »names. I already tagged 2 pages by NoraCook and they were declared as copyright violation. Instead tagging QD to all of the remaining creations, I request...
Click to read more »determine whether the simplewiki page was copied from there (making it a copyright violation), or if their page was copied from simplewiki? Kk.urban (talk)...
Click to read more »believe this revision: special:permalink/9011671 should be deleted as a copyright violation from Encyclopedia Britannica. Kk.urban (talk) 03:52, 23 March...
Click to read more »Ferien. I'm not sure if it's on commons though, as there is likely a copyright for the logo. Apparently, with the old Zellers logo, HBC didn't renew...
Click to read more »broad, and not appropriate for an encyclopedic project. Again, there were copyright violations as you too closely translated sentence by sentence of the Scroll...
Click to read more »April 2025 (UTC) I've tagged it for quick deletion since the article is a copyright violation. Ternera (talk) 19:45, 23 April 2025 (UTC) You can use WP:TWINKLE...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:54, 16 August 2023 (UTC) Legally that must be so. The whole of copyright law depends on it. Macdonald-ross (talk) 19:15, 18 August 2023 (UTC) It...
Click to read more »the text in a pastebin? Since I wrote like 95% of it it shouldn't be a copyright violation. Naleksuh (talk) 20:06, 26 February 2022 (UTC) The content you...
Click to read more »parts of images and putting them together and no clue if any of it is copyrighted or not. As the AI will generate its own description and info about it...
Click to read more »articles in your own words. Copying from the English Wikipedia violates copyright and articles from there do not use language that is simple enough. If...
Click to read more »Hi, Could someone revdel this please as it was taken from here, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:56, 2 May 2025 (UTC) Done.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions)...
Click to read more »