Redirect to:
Remember, always try to be helpful and not harmful. Everyone is allowed to help make Wikipedia better. However, sometimes different users may have different...
Click to read more »relevant reliably sourced publications. Identifying and interacting with SPAs requires both civility and tact. No personal attacks Do not bite the newcomers...
Click to read more »how to improve an article Their changes often avoid gross breaches of civility, especially by avoiding personal attacks, even though they interfere with...
Click to read more »These awards are part of the Kindness Campaign and are meant to promote civility and WikiLove. They are a form of warm fuzzy: they are free to give and...
Click to read more »Creol(talk) 15:34, 28 February 2007 (UTC) Moved my vote to Neutral, in light of civility issues. -- Creol(talk) 12:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC) I only had temporary access...
Click to read more »talk 13:14, 23 November 2006 (UTC) Support Great job with articles and civility! PullToOpen Talk 15:19, 23 November 2006 (UTC) Support --M7 15:26, 23 November...
Click to read more »BG7even 09:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC) Changing to Oppose, I have seen some civility problems in this very page, but the comments are staying calmer than in...
Click to read more »It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice. Wikipedia:Civility Wikipedia:Do not feed the trolls Wikipedia:Vandals versus Trolls Wikipedia:Deny...
Click to read more »No original research Biographies of living persons Working with others Civility No personal attacks Harassment No legal threats Consensus Dispute resolution...
Click to read more »No original research Biographies of living persons Working with others Civility No personal attacks Harassment No legal threats Consensus Dispute resolution...
Click to read more »then neutral editors can help the article to be improved. Importance of civility During debates in articles' talk pages and at articles for deletion, disparaging...
Click to read more »jokingly. American Eagle (talk) 03:25, 11 May 2009 (UTC) No violation of the civility policy. Not even slightly close. Majorly talk 10:14, 11 May 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »implication themselves, and doing so exempts you from the strictures of civility and good faith. Come to think of it, why waste time constructing a sarcastic...
Click to read more »full Rfb if you decide you actually want to run for it. Too many issues (civility, misusing your admin tools to unblock yourself, etc) to be considered a...
Click to read more »one finds funny, another person may find mean and hurtful. The use of humor does not override such core policies as Civility and No Personal Attacks....
Click to read more »Wikipedia, she cares about the articles we're here to contribute to. Her civility level is just fine when communicating with others. She has participated...
Click to read more »bring up the subject of civility. I've been observing seWP lately (rather than editing) and I've noticed a distinct lack of civility. I'd like to bring up...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Civility policy proposal. Any thoughts and/or suggestions?--TBCΦtalk? 15:42, 12 October 2006 (UTC) I renamed it to Wikipedia:Be kind. "Civility" isn't...
Click to read more »section without prior, adequate discussion, it is an obvious violation of WP:Civility to delete (or totally rewrite) someone else's text without asking their...
Click to read more »at English Wikipedia. She unfailingly treats others with kindness and civility. Looking through her contributions, she participates in both writing/editing...
Click to read more »does not directly go against our policies - we do not even have a page on civility but it is still policy to be civil). The page was copied over and lightly...
Click to read more »about is a normal user, and should be treated with civility (heck, we even treat vandals with civility). In order to replace our current bureaucrat, he'd...
Click to read more »there has been no assurance that the series of escalations (issues with civility), which led to the final indef block, will not happen again. Such problems...
Click to read more »(UTC) "I am an enwiki and commons vandal"... 9_9. But anyway, I think civility is important. If a vandal is editing pages going "User:X is a fag" or something...
Click to read more »and has violated clauses such as en:WP:Harassment#Threats, WP:AGF, WP:Civility, and WP:NPA. It's not a user warning; it's a threat. If you continue to...
Click to read more »issues don't concern me. Clementina consistently shows a high level of civility and matureness. The project would certainly benefit from Clementina, whatever...
Click to read more »it might be not considered important, it is nice and potentially adds civility; one of the eternal issues in Wiki communities. Thanks. Fylbecatulous talk...
Click to read more »Wikipedias would be more destructive than constructive. The policies of civility, no personal attacks, and such already promote a helpful and warm environment;...
Click to read more »legislative proposals as well as the media response tomorrow. I appreciate the civility and high level of discussion that we had here. Racepacket (talk) 05:42...
Click to read more »trolling, censorship, trolling, censorship, biting newbies and lacking civility, bad tagging, incivility and biting. Not that it will make much difference...
Click to read more »interesting one - returning after 3 years of inactivity to warn me about my civility. As regards the clown section, it is a 'clowns in popular culture' at best...
Click to read more »may be of assistance when dealing with and avoiding WikiHate: Wikipedia:Civility Wikipedia:Assume good faith Wikipedia:No personal attacks Wikipedia:Wikiquette...
Click to read more »be the shortest block necessary. I'm going by the English Wikipedia's civility policy, since I haven't read Simple English Wikipedia's version of the...
Click to read more »Unfortunately through your own actions you have caused your credibility in civility to be ruined. In other words why would someone act to stop an uncivil user...
Click to read more »users or their arguments goes against the principles of consensus and civility that we try to have here. I support a formal and final warning of them...
Click to read more »to be honest is pretty bad in some places) and easily could have led to civility blocks on the part of other users and admins. As I said before why not...
Click to read more »he is being a massive hypocrite by saying... shows a complete lack of civility and frankly, piss poor judgement on the candidates behalf. RfA is about...
Click to read more »took, not the person themselves, which is entirely compliant with the civility policy ("you should always talk about a person's changes, not the person...
Click to read more »Involvement in community discussions shows temperment and ability to follow civility rules which simply creating articles cannot do. He also has done things...
Click to read more »to avoid prejudicing myself, I won't add those on here. Remembering the civility guidelines, I'll stay quiet now. DaneGeld (talk) 20:36, 8 November 2024...
Click to read more »and useful way, then learn to follow the guidelines and to behave with civility with other editors and users. No profanities.Thank you Hamneto (talk) 04:41...
Click to read more »every occurence in that time, but I distinctly remember communication, civility, and maturity issues over the last year with Naleksuh and Computer Fizz...
Click to read more »answer to any of these is no, then this deletion request is not about civility — it’s about silencing dissent. Best regards, BZPN (talk) 13:07, 22 June...
Click to read more »more Wikipedia users on the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:Civility policies. Essays may represent common ideas, or ideas that many users would...
Click to read more »by being civil. Thank you. But this is not a reason to leave. Unless a civility policy is truly too much to handle (which I doubt), I see no reason why...
Click to read more »is arguably the most important thing about RfA, along with things like civility, maturity etc, which I think makes this more of an enwiki problem really...
Click to read more »up their position, so the whole thing petered out. All of this is our civility processes working as they normally do. (Perhaps not how things should’ve...
Click to read more »Drafting Committee, Zuz (WMF) (talk) 15:44, 3 May 2023 (UTC) Shouldn't the civility guideline be switched to a policy, as the enwiki version is? Users should...
Click to read more »may interact on other topics but should be held to the highest levels of civility at such times. So that is Super Dromaeosaurus: topic/interact ban, Yung...
Click to read more »