Redirect to:
this way. CheckUser requests can be made at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. Presently, there are 6 CheckUsers. See Special:ListUsers/checkuser for an automatically...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:RCUWP:RCU WP:RFCUWP:RFCU WP:SPIWP:SPI CheckUser is the process of checking information about two or more users (including named users and...
Click to read more »deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Kangaroo Research Foundation (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) Egypt Freak II (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) IntoxicatorMan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Jaleh B (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) DarkType (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) Amongusches (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) 24.139.162.124 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) 108.192.73.8 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) Jacob Louis Mathew (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) 2010 Former (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Gk0094 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Under...
Click to read more »deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) IP range 131.123.0.0/16 This user's changes are very similar to...
Click to read more »deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) This user may be related to these collection of IP's, see more...
Click to read more »deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) (sock master) Sludge Monster (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) 92.15.33.16 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Simple11 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) 68.220.173.9 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) 121.54.64.36 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) 18Weaver (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) The "Disney Anon" (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »IP used for IonasRand was blocked earlier along with the user account. Checkuser was done on his newer account, User:SmallTalker1, it was blocked as an...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:RCUWP:RCU WP:RFCUWP:RFCU WP:SPIWP:SPI CheckUser is the process of checking information about two or more users (including named users and...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) Namo goran (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Pplkhhb (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) - new account Junoh Boy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs ·...
Click to read more »SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Esiimana (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) VikRagnarr (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) Coughing hydrogen (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) Han Tae-Sul (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) MinaShaban7 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) 92.15.33.16 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) Privatenetwork57 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Jaggtu (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) I'd...
Click to read more »an archive of past Requests for CheckUser action. Do not make any changes to this page. For new requests please see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser....
Click to read more »SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) EwwyCat (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Badrul Bambang Sucaksono (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs ·...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) Adjoasimple (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) Pzhvbilla$ (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Block/Lock evasion See Special:Diff/9452242; also see my comments...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) 2010 Former (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) Sharinkurani (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) Bhoomikaso11 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) 2402:E000:649:565B:0:0:0:1 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs ·...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) CiteMaster (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) Monday4real1995 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) Yourplacetime (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Qeenyoy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) Aliraza77777 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) Okaydude2323$ (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) - new account ~2026-42589-81 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted...
Click to read more »deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) I have other Tas to compare them to but since there are a lot that...
Click to read more »SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Koradass (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »IP used for IonasRand was blocked earlier along with the user account. Checkuser was done on his newer account, User:SmallTalker1, it was blocked as an...
Click to read more »checkuser (log)) The Unknown Explorer (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) Taylor J Marshall (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »Special:ListUsers/checkuser This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »Requesting for CheckUser on the following users, reason because this user just registered newly and has started editing like pros, i think this users...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) AdhyaEditor (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) HarryinLondon (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »was to Delete. MathXplore (talk) 06:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC) Category:Checkuser blocked (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer No successful RfAs in 2016....
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer No successful RfAs in 2019....
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 09:11, 30 November 2024 (UTC) Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archives (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close...
Click to read more »been an active user and powerful admin here. I request him to become a checkuser too. - Huji reply 14:29, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Candidate's acceptance:...
Click to read more »changes) for the position of checkuser. Peter has many unique qualities that lend to wards him becoming a good checkuser. Firstly, he is very active,...
Click to read more »the checkuser flag --Eptalon (talk) 20:54, 6 March 2008 (UTC) Strong support - Proved himself to be a great 'crat; has the potential to be a checkuser. --§...
Click to read more »opposed on, Brian has taken upon himself the role of a sort of assistant to checkusers. Brian has helped both myself and Jamesofur with countless CUs. Having...
Click to read more »page reviewers. Users who are given the checkuser flag ('checkuser' user group) have access to Special:CheckUser. They are able to view a list of all IP...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer Since I am no longer going to...
Click to read more »sometimes there's sockpuppetry going on late at night. I am willing to be a CheckUser here at Simple Wikipedia because I think I have what it takes. I am over...
Click to read more »willing to propose myself for CheckUser access if community wishes it. I looked at this page when someone asked me to do a CheckUser for them on Simple (not...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »my "usual" working hours I am often active on the project when other checkusers are not online. I have, previously, spent 17 years as an IT engineer working...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:RFPWP:RFP WP:RFAWP:RFA WP:RFBWP:RFB Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »nominate User:M7 for checkuser status on Simple English Wikipedia. He is already a Wikimedia Steward and has all the requirements for checkuser access. - Huji...
Click to read more »Oversight and Checkuser more helpful and necessary then it normally would be on a wiki our size. I've done quite a few Requests for checkuser in the past...
Click to read more »changes. If the meta:Checkuser tool was used to determine that sockpuppetry had occurred, only another administrator with access to Checkuser can overturn the...
Click to read more »trust him to have CheckUser. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 22:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Weak Oppose We already have one inactive checkuser. I would like to...
Click to read more »to be a checkuser, but was not promoted. Congratulations Chenzw! - For passing a request for bureaucratship! Vector applied to be a checkuser, but was...
Click to read more »everyone's participation. I recognise I don't have the required support to checkuser. At four opposes, there is a probability that I will not receive the required...
Click to read more »changes) for the Checkuser flag as well. I have the utmost trust and respect for this user, and I believe that he will use the checkuser tool appropriately...
Click to read more »Razorflame: Hi there all. I would like to present Kennedy to the community for Checkuser. He is 18 and will be willing to confirm his identity with the WMF if...
Click to read more »Simple Wikipedia to require any admin to have the checkuser bit. For the very rare occasions when a checkuser might be required, a request could be made of...
Click to read more »things to consider: according to meta:CheckUser policy#Access to checkuser, 1. As of 11 April 2007, Checkusers must be 18 years of age, of legal age in...
Click to read more »Razorflame: Hi there all. I would like to present to the community Majorly for Checkuser. He has been an active administrator on this site for the past year (at...
Click to read more »editors make very similar bad edits. This sometimes cause a request for a Checkuser. If it is really obvious that the edits are being made by the same person...
Click to read more »it. Candidate declined nomination. I would like to nominate Tygrrr for checkuser status because he has been very active lately, and he has been a major...
Click to read more »Barras (talk · contribs) I wish to propose that Barras be added to our checkuser team. I am confident that Barras has the technical know-how, trust, and...
Click to read more »succeed. Please do not modify it. Hi, I'd like to offer myself as a new CheckUser. I have been editing since November 2006, and have had adminship nearly...
Click to read more »creator fez Admin fez Bureaucrat fez SPI Clerk fez ArbCom Clerk fez Oversighter fez Checkuser fez Arbitrator fez Steward fez Board member fez Jimbo fez...
Click to read more »this tool and also identified to the WMF. I know we already have several checkusers, but no one of us can be always around. I think the additional flag would...
Click to read more »relied on behavioural patterns to determine cases of sockpuppetry. The checkuser tool will help me with dealing with cases of sockpuppetry that are harder...
Click to read more »influence and/or impact required. Opoloooo (talk) 10:09, 11 July 2022 (UTC) - Checkuser blocked (Operator873) Delete - Can't see how this is notable along with...
Click to read more »misusing several accounts and/or committing sockpuppetry, you can ask a CheckUser to confirm this by adding the username on the WP:RFCU page. Sock puppetry...
Click to read more »I think that I can now be trusted with CheckUser information, and if I'm not online, I'm just an email away. Strong Support. Archer7 has been active,...
Click to read more »00:15, 3 October 2010 (UTC) I'm nominating Djsasso for the position of checkuser. Djsasso is an admin and crat I both respect and trust greatly. We do...
Click to read more »to Wikipedia RFCU Typically said in conversations relating to sockpuppets. The full meaning is request for checkuser. Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:RFPWP:RFP WP:RFAWP:RFA WP:RFBWP:RFB Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account...
Click to read more »it shouldnt be a standard uw-block template as only checkusers can verify abuse using the checkuser extension... --Ferien2 (talk) 16:18, 4 September 2022...
Click to read more »ShockingHawk 12:45, 12 October 2008 (UTC) Support Pending response from Checkuser. No real issues I can see. Has a decent amount of QDs etc. Kennedy (talk)...
Click to read more »and village pump. For more specific requests, go to SPI (Requests for checkuser), AIV (Vandalism in progress) and the Administrators' noticeboard. #wikipedia-simple...
Click to read more »track record here Most of their edits were to enwiki, where they are checkuser blocked -> only project with an established track record resulted in an...
Click to read more »December November October September August July June May April March February January...
Click to read more »given. Vector (talk · contribs) I would like to nominate myself for a CheckUser, I'm also a sysop and a bureaucrat here but I think that I could help...
Click to read more »need the tool to do the job properly. I am an experienced checkuser having been a checkuser on this project from 2009 for over four years and a steward...
Click to read more »up a lot of my onwiki time. I am therefore offering to step down as a checkuser on simplewiki in order for Djsasso to take up the role instead. This is...
Click to read more »sockfarm. When I can find the correct account, I'll file a Request for Checkuser. DaneGeld (talk) 22:01, 17 July 2018 (UTC) What is RFCU put the link blue...
Click to read more »currently not an adnin either; I see little chance for them to be granted checkuser status; given that even an established user like vector has troubles to...
Click to read more »as abuse of power by a CheckUser. Other than emergencies, when do you think stewards should intervene in place of a CheckUser? -Examknowtalk 00:12, 29...
Click to read more »like Commons, I believe it should be assigned by checkusers. We're still small, and the checkusers can check ranges for collateral damages without an...
Click to read more »to Fr33k above, as opposed to checkuser. So I have less care about high or low numbers on an admin case. But checkuser should have higher standards. About...
Click to read more »amongst the most active admins we have. I think she would make a good checkuser. --Eptalon 21:55, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Candidate's Acceptance Tygrrr...
Click to read more »and available for CU requests. I am also available to crosscheck other checkusers. I am already identified to the foundation and have no issues dealing...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC). Note - I asked for a checkuser related to the three accounts that have voted keep so far, but the checkuser result was "not confirmed." I believe...
Click to read more »inclusion. Wumanfinewella (talk) 16:02, 26 May 2023 (UTC) Blocked by checkuser. NytharT.C 12:04, 29 May 2023 (UTC) Once again I must ask you how he is...
Click to read more »nomination from Peterdownunder. I have read through the local and global CheckUser policies and am identified to the WMF. Thank you, Vermont (talk) 17:26...
Click to read more »request, The admin noticeboard), I would also like to nominate myself for a CheckUser. Again, this is done to give people a choice. If they then feel that one...
Click to read more »of them are administrators. Simple English Wikipedia gains its first checkusers, Creol and M7. New Main Page design which incorporates very good articles...
Click to read more »will be deleted as G3. There were also socking issues here, fortunately checkuser was available to me. This RFD can be closed G6, fr33kman 11:28, 3 August...
Click to read more »that use of the right is logged locally so checkusers will be able to see its use and why. Local checkusers and oversighters have global access to this...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer Voting for removal of sysop rights...
Click to read more »changes to change your user name or take another user name. See WP:RFCU for CheckUser requests. See WP:OS for oversight. ~2026-41722-42 (talk · contribs) has...
Click to read more »significant range, or for a significant time, consider asking a user with checkuser access to check for collateral damage - that is, for the presence of other...
Click to read more »also propose that a checkuser other than Creol check the IPs to confirm that what Creol says is true. This can be an involved checkuser, like Alison, or...
Click to read more »be reformatted and fixed Never17 (talk) 20:06, 27 September 2023 (UTC) Checkuser blocked account. Pure Evil (talk) 21:23, 27 September 2023 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »the reply to Operator873 is very concerning. A CheckUser block should not be lifted by a non-CheckUser without consultation simply due to an unblock request...
Click to read more »ask a steward. I feel oversight would be very useful while working as a checkuser in several cases, such as last night. I'm on IRC most of the day so readily...
Click to read more »for the reason: We don't have clerks on simplewiki. Possibly move to Checkuser-note? Or, we could start clerks. BlackWidowMovie0 (talk) 18:53, 20 January...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Just for info: I ran a checkuser yesterday, and the two users in favor of keeping turned out to be the...
Click to read more »notablity --Farsadx (talk) 06:48, 8 December 2024 (UTC) This user was checkuser-blocked. Depextual (talk) 05:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »for already some time and decided to take this step now. I used to be a checkuser here from 2010 until my resignation in 2015. At the beginning of the year...
Click to read more »en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Md Sunnat Ali Mollik, confirmed on bnwiki by checkuser[1]. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 18:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Note I just noticed the user was blocked by checkuser a day after creating this, so I've requested G5. CountryANDWestern (talk)...
Click to read more »..). When a bureaucrat and checkuser left at the beginning of this year, this brought weeks of re-electing new checkusers; with the drama that followed...
Click to read more »source here either. Also this article was created by a user that was checkuser-blocked and globally locked. 2620:6E:6000:2900:4DC6:6E43:9329:FDEC (talk)...
Click to read more »Juliancolton Hello fr33kman, thank you for joining us! You're an admin, checkuser, and bureaucrat here on the Simple English Wikipedia, but tell us a bit...
Click to read more »wish to be granted the CheckUser status. Only administrators can apply for CheckUser access. A successful request for CheckUser must have a minimum of...
Click to read more »Currently Vector is running for checkuser access on WP:RFA. So far about a week has passed since he nominated himself for checkuser but only received 3 supports...
Click to read more »--Kyoko 18:59, 17 May 2008 (UTC) I suggest a checkuser if any more accounts are created. Or maybe a checkuser is already in order. But whoever is creating...
Click to read more »or "delete", such as merging. Delete per nominator, and the user is checkuser-blocked. 166.107.163.247 (talk) 20:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC) Delete Delete...
Click to read more »nominated both RyanCross and Majorly for CheckUser. I was also thinking about nominating Synergy for Checkuser as well. Cheers, Razorflame 17:40, 29 January...
Click to read more »other wikis to simplewiki, I think we now have enough admins (plus two checkusers) to have a fourth bureaucrat. While I'm not actually meaning to jump to...
Click to read more »last checkuser thing he did was back in November of last year. I would therefore like to request that he be put up for removal of his Checkuser status...
Click to read more »any evidence they are globally banned List of globally banned users and checkuser found that Aminnie is not related. The SPI report mentions "conflict of...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:07, 28 July 2023 (UTC) Comment: Checkuser requested. MathXplore (talk) 06:32, 29 July 2023 (UTC) checkuser done, commented on the cu page. Affected...
Click to read more »right place? See WP:AN to speak to an administrator. See WP:RFCU for CheckUser requests. See WP:OS for oversight. See WP:RFRB to request the rollback...
Click to read more »(Non-administrator observation) The nominator (Isaias204) has been blocked by a checkuser and globally locked for long-term abuse. Kk.urban (talk) 06:08, 20 December...
Click to read more »About 90 accounts tagged as either confirmed or suspected sockpuppets, a checkuser nightmare trying to sort out multiple abuse issues (either sock or meat...
Click to read more »a Checkuser, Bureaucrat and Admin here. I am over 18, and willing to identify towards the foundation; I have already done this to become CheckUser. So...
Click to read more »publications cited in the article. Edibiz (talk) 22:36, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Checkuser note: Edibiz and Jansedits have been blocked as socks of each other. -Barras...
Click to read more »For this issue, Juliancolton interviewed one of Wikipedia's administrators and checkusers, Jamesofur (talk · contribs). Juliancolton: Hi Jamesofur, thank you for...
Click to read more »horrible blocks that are honestly a cause of de-adminship. I think without checkuser priveleges the abuse of the user will die down, but damn. The discussion...
Click to read more »took part. fr33kman 00:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC) I am an experienced admin, checkuser, former OSer and steward. I'd like to request oversightership to help...
Click to read more »11:28, 6 April 2011 (UTC) Checkuser right has been re-granted via meta upon my request. James is now our newest checkuser. Welcome back! -Barras (talk)...
Click to read more »parts: firstly, making a public page where checkuser statistics (the number of checks done by each checkuser in a given month) are uploaded, as is done...
Click to read more »06:28, 21 September 2006 (UTC) UPDATE: see en:Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ForestH2. With this confirmation, User:ForestH2 should now be considered...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer Several adminstrator accounts...
Click to read more »can use so give me what i want and then this can end". I have requested Checkuser, but should we deal with this? -- Da Punk '95 talk 20:19, 3 April 2008...
Click to read more »...
Click to read more »thanks Heaventoherl (talk) 16:15, 27 May 2023 (UTC) user blocked as a checkuser block by User:Eptalon Bobherry Talk My Changes 16:39, 27 May 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Notable enough. Wumanfinewella (talk) 23:02, 27 May 2023 (UTC) Blocked by checkuser. NytharT.C 12:02, 29 May 2023 (UTC) Keep - If it's good enough for EN...
Click to read more »good articles; as well as in elections of administrators/bureaucrats/checkusers). When you have contributed for some time, you can be elected administrator...
Click to read more »deletion/Requests/2022/Isaiah Oghenevwegba O., Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archive21#Isaiah_Oghenevwegba_Ogedegbe. MathXplore (talk) 14:39, 11 April...
Click to read more »make it seem like it really isn't there. This can be a useful tool for checkusers to have here (like hiding things that were courtesy blanked, and userpages...
Click to read more »been nominated for Bureaucrat; Vector and Tygrrr have been nominated for CheckUser. If you are interested in voting or voicing your opiniion, please do that...
Click to read more »January 2007 (UTC) User:Bobo now unblocked, CheckUser shows that user is not a Kimberly Ashton sockpuppet. CheckUser did detect a vandal sockpuppet on the IP...
Click to read more »WashingManwithwings (talk · contribs). Steward Spacebirdy ran a local checkuser to reveal that Bluegoblin7 (talk · contribs) and WashingManwithwings (talk ·...
Click to read more »August 2009 (UTC) @Majorly:Yes he is. @EVula:I can't find his name at the checkuser request that was referenced. User was blocked 2 years ago which means...
Click to read more »the author or authors of the article are banned users. I realize that a checkuser may not publicly connect an IP user with a named account. My own research...
Click to read more »16 May 2026 (UTC) Note to closing admin, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#Izaaqnewton. This user has only had a Wikipedia account for two hours...
Click to read more »IRC and able to respond when something happens. Fr33kman is an active Checkuser (and therefore already identified to the WMF) and my experiences with...
Click to read more »(UTC) That, and a resident checkuser, ought to nip this problem in the bud. Only problem is, we still don't have a checkuser, to say for 100% sure what...
Click to read more »username. Majorly came onto IRC today saying that checkuser blocks should not be undone without any checkuser consultations or evidence. Since Majorly did...
Click to read more »Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:31, 1 August 2024 (UTC) Comment: Author blocked by checkuser. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:43, 1 August 2024 (UTC) Neutral - Don't agree...
Click to read more »(This exactly why we hardly allow a person to become a checkuser; a single mistake at the checkuser level can result in lots of headache). Unlike Nanochip08...
Click to read more »involved at this RFD. A closing admin may want to check that out, or a checkuser might want to look at the accounts here. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:40...
Click to read more »thing? Griffinofwales (talk) 19:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC) I performed a checkuser on the IP address to find out what user account it normally is. It is...
Click to read more »Notable. --QwErTyUiOpaSDg20 (talk) 19:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC) (Non-checkuser observation) Both of the users who voted keep have been blocked for sockpuppetry...
Click to read more »offering periodic Checkuser to check him and the one-strike rule. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 17:35, 27 July 2010 (UTC) Unfortunately Checkuser policy does not allow...
Click to read more »comments; anything else you'd like to say? Should I mention that I'm a new CheckUser? Thanks for your time, Brian. Join us next time for another interview...
Click to read more »four provided IPs have a zero match, there would be no basis shown for a Checkuser on the named accounts to see if there is any connection at all there since...
Click to read more »...
Click to read more »December November October September August July June May April March February January...
Click to read more »December November October September August July June May April March February January...
Click to read more »level), then this is certainly doable by any admin; Remember Crats and Checkusers are for special things only. Any yes, a poll does not replace a discussion...
Click to read more »for feedback --Dalibor Bosits © 08:29, 10 December 2010 (UTC) Why is checkuser considered such a sensitive right? When anon editors edit, anyone can...
Click to read more »this article. Wumanfinewella (talk) 23:11, 27 May 2023 (UTC) Blocked by checkuser. NytharT.C 12:00, 29 May 2023 (UTC) @Wumanfinewella: Being the leader...
Click to read more »there might be sockpuppetry attempts on this page; I filed a request for checkuser. --Mark91it's my world 16:39, 13 January 2013 (UTC) Delete. Notability...
Click to read more »could be granted by sysop, but with a timer. For example, I could get the Checkuser for 10 minutes in an event of edit war through users and IPs. Once 10...
Click to read more »guess about a third of the active edtors are admins, including Crats, Checkusers, and Oversighters (yes, one of the differences of this wiki: CU/OS/Crat...
Click to read more »(UTC) Creol blcoked a rather broad IP range (66.174.0.0/16) after his checkuser investigations about a username vandal who created 43 vandal accounts...
Click to read more »encyclopedia. That said, there is a separate sock puppet issue that a checkuser or other appropriate person needs to look at. The account is currently...
Click to read more »reply? Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:26, 1 August 2024 (UTC) Author blocked by checkuser. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:43, 1 August 2024 (UTC) Keep: I added the link...
Click to read more »useful, more drastic means are likely to be needed to reduce the problem (Checkuser). -- Creol(talk) 09:49, 18 February 2007 (UTC) I think it'll be great...
Click to read more »on Simple to help get the 25 required votes in the recent request for checkuser(ship) but this all seems a bit harsh. Razorflame is, I assume, a young...
Click to read more »as entrepreneur. Ravensfire (talk) 14:56, 28 July 2023 (UTC) Comment: Checkuser requested. MathXplore (talk) 13:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »technologies, making him notable. User: Mastminer 6:33, 27 July 2025 (UTC) Checkuser note: Mastminer is likely related to Numerialpa.--BRP ever 12:21, 27 July...
Click to read more »(UTC) Hello; I would like to introduce Jamesofur, an administrator and checkuser here on Simple English Wikipedia. I believe his maturity and forward thinking...
Click to read more »shown to be the same person. In any case, checkuser requests should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. This page is for communicating with admins...
Click to read more »make it seem like it really isn't there. This can be a useful tool for checkusers to have here (like hiding things that were courtesy blanked, and userpages...
Click to read more »Wikipedia as web host. Also see relevant case at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser#Grammeteo818. Chenzw Talk 16:20, 1 March 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »administrator who blocked it first is Creol, due to socking issues. A checkuser should look into this instead. Chenzw Talk 12:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »anyone but an elected Bureaucrat" - no, bureaucrats close RFAs and RFBs. Checkuser and oversight are a totally different set of tools. Additionally, if I...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC) I'd like to hear what the admins and Checkusers think, but my first thought is we don't want to validate them by giving...
Click to read more »without one. - EchoBravo contribs 15:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC) I have done a CheckUser on them. This came up with one static address (for all the about 10 users)...
Click to read more »Cunkelfratz! 20:40, 12 July 2009 (UTC) I would agree. That is like the checkuser election policy here on simple. Barras (talk) 20:43, 12 July 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »vandal edits but instead accumulates a large number of good edits. A checkuser discovers he is a sockpuppet. Should he be blocked? --Chemicalinterest...
Click to read more »August 2010 (UTC) (<-) I talkted to TCNSV/Telecom..., and also rand a checkuser (the two accounts match the same IP range). I have adapted the block on...
Click to read more »discuss about. In addition, the nominator refuses to explain the enwiki checkuser block. The nominator fails to answer about the concerns after the unilateral...
Click to read more »Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 08:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC) Furthermore, he is a CheckUser. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC) Don't see much of...
Click to read more »m:oversight. I propose that we add this permission to our two most active checkusers, who have already identified themselves to the foundation. User:Creol...
Click to read more »been blocked This is an interesting question. I would first request a checkuser with the suspected sockmaster (I don't actually know the exact term, but...
Click to read more »understand. :) Sincerely, —Clementina talk 23:21, 13 June 2010 (UTC) I was the checkuser who initially raised concerns about sockpuppetry. Along with another CU...
Click to read more »Speedy delete- LTA - cross wiki Umar Jaum promospam see file here and checkuser results here and here Hoyanova (talk) 18:14, 22 December 2024 (UTC). Comment:...
Click to read more »every time an emergency comes up. It couldn't hurt to carry over the checkuser status as well for the same basic reason, but that is a different story...
Click to read more »Deletion review Requests for permissions Database reports Requests for checkuser Oversight Administrators' noticeboard Page requests Most wanted: Ida Tarbell...
Click to read more »controversy at Da Punk '95's RFA, linked above. Cometstyles mentioned the checkuser request of User:Sam24. Sam24 voted against User:Cometstyles in his request...
Click to read more »probation then? Normandy (talk) 21:47, 2 October 2011 (UTC) It allowed checkusers to check you for socks periodically which could be considered fishing...
Click to read more »report this sockpuppet without requesting a checkuser (as I would do on Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser). Is there a way to do this on simple wiki? Mikehawk10...
Click to read more »♥ Nifky! I am going to take a wild guess that Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser is the same as the Sockpuppet investigations at the English Wikipedia...
Click to read more »It's a bot & cross-wiki. Hand it off to your CUs (& they should share on checkuser-l) – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 22:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC) Sorry, looks like...
Click to read more »31 March 2009 (UTC) Actually, I didn't miss your point. I knew that checkusers could check for potential collateral damage, and yes, they can, to an...
Click to read more »removed the discussion about checkuser insight when he removed his unblock request. I want to make sure that the need for checkuser input doesn't go forgotten...
Click to read more »Razorflame 22:13, 6 March 2009 (UTC) I just checked the Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser page and it's getting pretty full, is somebody gonna archive it any time...
Click to read more »listed as active 5 bureaucrats (7 total, 2 inactive) 5 oversighters 3 checkusers And there are between five and ten regular, unprivileged contributors...
Click to read more »being a disruption. His actions caused nearly every active admin, 'crat, checkuser, and several editors to stop what they were doing to deal with the issues...
Click to read more »delete/undelete pages, or to see who is editing from where (in the case of checkuser), or to rename users, promote bots, and make new admins (in the case of...
Click to read more »for their votes at here. MathXplore (talk) 09:39, 24 July 2021 (UTC) Checkuser observation: The accounts Jahid Islam7,রাকিবুল হাসান মাহমুদ|রাকিবুল হাসান...
Click to read more »successful nominations for advanced permissions (administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser and oversighter). I see vandals and/or disruptive editors, disrupting...
Click to read more »02:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC) I already brought this up over on the WP:AN. A checkuser on this user didn't reveal any clear information. Can't say if its him...
Click to read more »(UTC) In general, checkuser questions can be answered with yes/no, and are of the form is user X the same as Y?- If you want a CheckUser, please report it...
Click to read more »that have accounts which can edit MediaWiki:Common.js, have access to checkuser or have access to Oversight. These types of accounts have sensitive access...
Click to read more »one was mine and one was a re-promotion, 3 Bureaucrat promotions, and 2 CheckUser promotions. In addition, there has been one re-confirmation and one de-sysopping...
Click to read more »2013 (UTC) I don't see a problem with leaving it where it is. Wikipedia:Checkusers, etc. also redirect to that page, so if you need to find something, you...
Click to read more »damages by a compromised admin account, worse if it is a bureaucrat or checkuser since you said that an unnoticing active admin has their password hacked...
Click to read more »24 February 2010 (UTC) I thought you only needed the 25 supports for Checkuser.-- † CR90 22:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC) For oversight as well. –Juliancolton | Talk...
Click to read more »(UTC) And yes, checkusers will be able to find it too, that's what the checkuser role was created for. Note however, there is a m:Checkuser policy on Meta...
Click to read more »editing shortly after the RFD opened, and which have also been blocked by checkusers, also suggests that canvassing or other fraudulent voting activity was...
Click to read more »project. This makes it necessary to re-elect new users into positions of CheckUser and Bureaucrat. It is clear that with new users in these positions, this...
Click to read more »Once as Kennedy, once as NotGiven. He was asked about it quietly by a checkuser, and he decided to run an RFDA/RFDB of his own accord and failed it. fr33kman...
Click to read more »Talk 16:05, 21 July 2008 (UTC) The current comment does not warrant a checkuser, sorry. --Eptalon (talk) 16:08, 21 July 2008 (UTC) Seriously that wasn't...
Click to read more »hope more participates. Cheers, ♥ Belinda ♥ 08:51, 8 April 2010 (UTC) Checkuser and oversight are the ones that require twenty-five votes. RfA is whatever...
Click to read more »ban, so it makes a difference. This is exactly the reason why we need checkusers. Blockinblox - talk 11:41, 24 September 2007 (UTC) You got on the defensive...
Click to read more »shifted. Shapiros10 Flap the Yap 19:09, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Hi all. I as checkuser can confirm that neither of those two accounts on the English Wikipedia...
Click to read more »is for editors, and thus it is extended to every user, be they admin, checkuser, bureaucrat, steward or IP. Admins no more have to follow all the rules...
Click to read more »distraction to us. Fortunately with the handful of active admins and checkusers, most of these disruptions have been taken care of. In the past, there...
Click to read more »support votes, with a total of 70% support. I will also point out that both checkuser, and oversight are specialisations (in our wiki: of the administrator)...
Click to read more »bureaucrats becoming inactive. We can't possibly give them higher rights (checkuser, oversight, steward?!). This "reward-like" system shouldn't be implemented...
Click to read more »sockpuppet (SarahM is laso editing from the PurpleCloud address). To know how Checkuser works, please look at its usage policy. --Eptalon 22:38, 1 September 2007...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) IP's are IP's. I do not think us regular users have access to checkuser tools. SoyokoAnis - talk 12:03, 13 October 2022 (UTC) Absolutely not @SoyokoAnis...
Click to read more »means not blocking named users operating from the IPs). I haven't run a checkuser, as so far I haven't seen any need. I do however trust the named editor;...
Click to read more »user:Macdonald-ross, but now edits will be made under this username. Checkusers can identify my location. Editors may still call me Mac! Or 'Brick', I...
Click to read more »(UTC) Our checkusers are elected by the community based on trust, including the trust that they will make good decisions based on checkuser evidence only...
Click to read more »nominate Blockinblox for CheckUser so that we can avoid the scenario Netoholic mentioned in his self-nomination for CheckUser. aflm would work if Blockinblox...
Click to read more »-- see here. Shouldn't it matter to us that there is no on-point ENWP checkuser data? More to the point, Racepacket has no history of being an SEWP sockpuppet...
Click to read more »here shows IPs from a Norway ISP. Bouncing alot there.. Would take a checkuser to confirm and that would just be a fishing trip. --Creol(talk) 21:02...
Click to read more »ban: (En:wp user was informed of probable impersonation), User matches checkuser profile but also has other details. No vandalism from this account but...
Click to read more »privileged user rights (for example, admins, bureaucrats, oversighters, checkusers). It appears that this may be because of weak or reused passwords. Community...
Click to read more »(for whatever reason he does it) and gets the bonus of annoying people. Checkuser and WP:Duck agree on it all being the same LTA editor. Then one day, an...
Click to read more »the Olympics, the location of the IP is misdiscribed as my location, no Checkuser study is conducted, and that false assumption is used to argue against...
Click to read more »Several channels are restricted in who can join them; there's also one for checkusers, one for stewards. As a comparison: Mail is transferred as plain text...
Click to read more »multiple accounts User:Altwiki was the one who caused this issue. Perhaps a checkuser is in order. -Djsasso (talk) 14:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC) Definitely. I've...
Click to read more »but for future reference, the place to make a checkuser request is Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. That link is at the top of this page. -- Auntof6...
Click to read more »protected are those in "support" roles, like administrators, OTRS agents, checkusers, etc. We want to be sure you know about this and have a chance to join...
Click to read more »associates IPs and usernames, this section neeeds to be limited to the checkusers we have.--Eptalon (talk) 12:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC) I mean yeah, we should...
Click to read more »Fish I fixed it. ONUnicorn 20:30, 19 October 2006 (UTC) There has been a CheckUser request to check users Tangotango and Geeksluvpi. I wanted to announce...
Click to read more »personally trust Kennedy at the base, I cannot express this in a vote. I am a CheckUser, so voting would put me in a Conflict-of-Interest situation. But if people...
Click to read more »[changes] 22:24, 27 December 2009 (UTC) Please see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser#Central United Church Sarnia. There now appears to be sockpuppetry going...
Click to read more »whole pile of others from English Wikipedia. Someone might need to do a checkuser and see how many others there are.Kumioko (talk) 21:36, 23 November 2012...
Click to read more »and IPs known to be abusing multiple wikipedia sites. English Wikipedia checkusers and Wikimedia stewards can help explain it to any Simple Wikipedia admins...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer Dough4872 (talk · contribs ·...
Click to read more »is not suitable for being posted here (As an example: Data related to CheckUser). Given there are enough places that give out free email accounts, I do...
Click to read more »their Beta Features options. AbuseFilter log entries will be visible in CheckUser tool reports. [6] [7] It will soon be possible to search for log entries...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) No, this is not a sock. Checkuser will prove. Also, those EN socks were Trolls too (again, look at Checkuser there.)-- Spiderpig0001 Does whatever...
Click to read more »my block because I was in communication with stewards who preformed a CheckUser on it. Vermont (talk) 17:29, 21 October 2018 (UTC) YouTubeUK was recently...
Click to read more »usually requires a checkuser test to be run (which in turn, will require some hints, and some vandalism beforehand); while I have the checkuser flag, I have...
Click to read more »least most of you) may know, I've been an oversighter, bureaucrat and checkuser here (RfO, RfB and RfCU). I dropped the crat and os rights quite some...
Click to read more »something. Run a checkuser on Da Punk and Ionass. They're the same person! I will reveal why in a private email if neccessary, since checkuser isn't for fishing...
Click to read more »as merging. Comment: Seems to be related with Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#Christian_Joy_Lorenzo_Bautista, possible QD G5 case. MathXplore (talk)...
Click to read more »multiple accounts on the BG7 account. Also, a CU is permitted by the checkuser policy to see if BG7 has in the past edited via school nodes. But that...
Click to read more »cannot act on this. You may also want to refer this issue to a local checkuser. Chenzw Talk 14:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC) If those who've commented here...
Click to read more »carefully looking into the situation. Either the steward who blocked or a checkuser should be contacted before whitelisting any IP. The only project where...
Click to read more »should be done to these accounts? Chenzw Talk 07:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC) Checkuser should verify this (not taking into account WMF policy, however it should...
Click to read more »sockpuppets being blocked on the English Wikipedia. The investigation, with checkuser results, can be found here. One of the confirmed sockpuppets is Bruhking56om...
Click to read more »changing password Special:CheckUser, Check user. Available only to users with the CheckUser right. Special:CheckUserLog, CheckUser log Special:CiteThisPage...
Click to read more »focused on New Page patrolling, anti vandalism work, RfDs/QDs, requests for checkuser and is extremely helpful with find long-term abuse cases. I think that...
Click to read more »ability. The rule states they cannot publicly comment on IPs. meta:CheckUser_policy#CheckUser_status Da LambTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 16:18, 18 July...
Click to read more »elsewhere (especially at YourWiki, where I also have things like Oversight, CheckUser etc) proves that I will not misuse the tools. Thanks, BG7even 19:20, 18...
Click to read more »your own name for serious consideration. I really think we need to get a checkuser here on some of these accounts... Blockinblox 03:15, 21 September 2006...
Click to read more »unsigned comment added by Adfromindia (talk • contribs) Administrator note: CheckUser strike Operator873 connect 06:53, 30 November 2022 (UTC) Keep Yes Article...
Click to read more »┌─────────────────────────────────┘ If the logs are still there, any checkuser should be able to verify both accounts were created from the same IP,...
Click to read more »editing restrictions: User:Ydennek is restricted to one account, subject to checkuser. User:Ydennek is placed on editing probation for a period of six months...
Click to read more »User:Kalajan/templates. Makes you wonder whose puppet Kalajan is. Too bad you can't use checkuser without evidence of who the puppetmaster is. -Djsasso (talk) 15:49, 10...
Click to read more »accounts pop up, I'd recommend blocking as sockpuppets and referring to a checkuser. Griffinofwales (talk) 11:41, 12 July 2014 (UTC) Alsatian (dog) and Bullmastiff...
Click to read more »every person is capable of it, including administrators, 'Crats, and Checkusers. I believe you've been doing a wonderful job, Yot.-- Chris†ianMan16 t...
Click to read more »status for people monitoring bot flags and watching them. We have already checkusers (No! thanks) patrollers (I've not got enough time) and of course admins...
Click to read more »1 Wikipedia:Requested articles 8 Page Edits Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser 1 Wikipedia:Requests for deletion 2 Wikipedia:Rules (Policy) 3 Wikipedia:Sandbox...
Click to read more »of right now the only ones that are removed are Admin/Crat/Oversight/Checkuser for inactivity. Your account is only 4 days old, once you have more experience...
Click to read more »remain Shamitaly (talk) 15:24, 22 November 2022 (UTC) Administrator note: CheckUser strike Operator873 connect 20:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC) Delete Yet again...
Click to read more »Jon@talk:~$ 10:13, 14 July 2010 (UTC) This block is a checkuserblock and only a checkuser can deal with it. fr33kman 10:19, 14 July 2010 (UTC) The checkuserblock...
Click to read more »Please unblock that account. And btw, there is a page for requesting checkusers to be done... -Barras (talk) 21:49, 11 April 2011 (UTC) As Barras said...
Click to read more »post this kind of reminder for requests that are not yours. The admins, checkusers, and bureaucrats here are all volunteers and can't always get to things...
Click to read more »once. --Trade (talk) 17:19, 24 July 2020 (UTC) Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#Chasehanens Confirmed Operator873talkconnect 17:39, 24 July 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Not a silly question, however there is a range of evidence that a checkuser examines when looking at sock puppet claims, so I am not obliged to verify...
Click to read more »Taracka and Wiki-star --Isis§(talk) 12:39, 18 June 2007 I'm filing an RFCU, checkuser, this will determine whether they're socks.-- Tdxiang 02:08, 19 June 2007...
Click to read more »entering this RfA, and acknowledged the mistake rather than blaming the checkuser who discovered it, I may be voting differently. But the story simply doesn't...
Click to read more »date: 18:36, 18 June 2020 (UTC) Hi! I'm Vermont, an administrator and checkuser here, and am happy to nominate DannyS712 for adminship. They have about...
Click to read more »a brand new user page with claims of being an admin, bureaucrat, and checkuser, and of made various kinds of changes even though the only change under...
Click to read more »the users choice of information, edit style and article selection, a checkuser request is almost certainly going to end in a wp:Duck reply so I brought...
Click to read more »but I just can't altogether. Synergy 01:54, 31 March 2016 (UTC) If you checkuser, all accounts are from a school. User:Thefishisnotdead is my ult, made...
Click to read more »crat), while uncapitalised userrights are those granted through meta (checkuser, oversight, import, etc). It's not just an enwiki thing (at least that's...
Click to read more »(talk) 05:41, 21 December 2022 (UTC) A new account (already reported to checkuser, possible block evasion) has made this page which is related to Wikipedia:Requests...
Click to read more »am wondering: What do others think? Should I do a global request for checkuser? Can we temporarily block the user? Thanks in advance for giving me thoughts...
Click to read more ») that could be addressed in a joint way by knowledgeable admins and checkusers. Also, both in the UK and in the US (as well as many other countries)...
Click to read more »already have them at enWP? Rights such as Bureaucrat, Oversight, and Checkuser. Griffinofwales2 (talk) 03:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC) No, though administrators...
Click to read more »29 March 2012 (UTC) I think it's generally a poor idea. There is the checkuser wiki that can be utilized for those that need to use that, but I still...
Click to read more »were a sock. SHB2000 (talk) 00:19, 27 September 2021 (UTC) Comment: Checkuser-comment to whoever closes this: This page has been semi-protected for...
Click to read more »two ideals I will state: Functionaries such as administrators, crats, checkusers, oversighters do not have to exercise those flags. Crats have and always...
Click to read more »how I can effectively prove my innocence, but please feel free to do a Checkuser, etc. if you are so inclined. Cheers, Tangotango (talk) 06:11, 9 October...
Click to read more »questionable. 89.8.85.114 (talk) 19:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC) Utilizing the CheckUser tool, I've been able to investigate this range and the IP editor concerned...
Click to read more »contributors; of these, there are about ten active admins / bureaucrats / checkusers / oversighters. --Eptalon (talk) 11:52, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Following Ep's...
Click to read more »accounts have both voted here. It might even bring someone to ask that a checkuser look into the issue. Having two users vote in the same unusual format...
Click to read more »Notwithstanding the tainting below, the editor has a positive contribution history. Checkuser evidence should not be brought here, unless it is conclusive. I don't...
Click to read more »socking in the support section was designed to disrupt the RfA and a checkuser has confirmed it was not done by Angela. --Ferien2 (talk) 08:56, 5 August...
Click to read more »categories, acting like a misery guts. Just because you're a bureaucrat and checkuser doesn't mean you have to act in a constantly sarcastic, grouchy manner...
Click to read more »Category:Wikipedia patrollers Category:Wikipedia rollbackers Category:Wikipedia checkusers Auntof6 (talk) 02:37, 8 September 2012 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »is these days much more active at the farsi Wikipedia as an admin and checkuser. From my point of view, the user should be removed. Either be active and...
Click to read more »the few cases where we should put the RfA on hold until an uninvolved checkuser takes a look. I hope that answers your question :) --Ferien (talk) 23:00...
Click to read more »underestimate how different our ways are from En wiki! We have at present 5 checkusers, 4 oversighters and, incidentally, 5 stewards (counting so-called "inactive"...
Click to read more »sockpuppets: https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#Roushil_Thoi_Singla_and_Jacob_Louis_Mathew Blissyu2 (talk) 01:21, 12 December...
Click to read more »meta:Steward requests/Username changes to change your user name or take another user name. See WP:RFCU for CheckUser requests. See WP:OS for oversight....
Click to read more »rights policy Advanced user groups Administrators RfA Bureaucrats RfB Interface administrators CheckUser and Oversight Category: Policies / Guidelines...
Click to read more »Since CheckUser permission requires 25 votes, I'd like to throw my name in as an option. I'm quite familiar with CheckUser itself, as well as other tools...
Click to read more »Man (talk) 11:57, 18 June 2008 (UTC) In the meantime, I will ask for a checkuser. Chenzw Talk 11:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC) What happened to WP:AGF? I'd...
Click to read more »significant and needed to have multiple explanations of why we were requesting checkuser input shows he is not close to ready for adminship. Only (talk) 12:08...
Click to read more »changes) 05:14, January 22, 2025 (UTC) Administrator note: This user is checkuser blocked. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:19, 22 January 2025 (UTC) There's a funny...
Click to read more »more instead of improving. She should be banned. Can you please run a checkuser if she is a block evading sockpuppet of the banned/kicked out editor of...
Click to read more »review but it is very notable.--Ducdo929 (talk) 05:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC) CheckUser strike. Operator873 connect 05:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC) KEEP There are...
Click to read more »(talk) 14:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC) Administrator note: Votes struck per CheckUser evidence of abuse. Operator873talkconnect 04:30, 15 May 2020 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »judge a editor and vote in a RfA with a support vote saying they are a CheckUser on another Wikimedia project, but an editor may not vote in a RfA with...
Click to read more »88.110.38.249 (talk) 20:15, 20 September 2023 (UTC) Comment: After a checkuser run, it turned out that TheDarkCoarkBoard, JohnThemanstan, NBAFAN1017...
Click to read more »reviewing (and possible rewrites) in my opinion. 3. I'd probably contact the checkuser that blocked the user before considering an unblock to see if there is...
Click to read more »Hockeycatcat (talk) (changes) 12:36, 6 September 2022 (UTC) Administrator note: CheckUser strike applied. Operator873 connect 03:35, 5 September 2022 (UTC) Whenever...
Click to read more »--Alexandravela0614 (talk) 05:06, 14 May 2023 (UTC) Administrator note: CheckUser strike Operator873 connect 01:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC) KeepHas good references...
Click to read more »* (talk) 13:13, 17 December 2010 (UTC) Comment Where can we ask for a checkuser query regarding users Schweizerfreund, 188.155.246.200 and the Hebrew...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:41, 26 November 2025 (UTC) Hello all, just to clarify: as a checkuser, I cannot link usernames, and either temporary accounts or ip addresses...
Click to read more »_recent_VIP_reports_(special:diff/9431290) and Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archive21#JA/ZH-originated_fake_doppelganger_accounts for one of my recent...
Click to read more »on the whole wiki. Since when did we ever get 25 positive votes for a checkuser?! Have we got 25 regular editors?! Commonsense needs to be brought into...
Click to read more »probably did (they no longer have that system). Since sockpuppet and CheckUser-alert banners don't actually sort pages to CAT:TWU, it's only if the page...
Click to read more »threats to admins who clean up his move disruption). Alison as a prominent checkuser was once stalked in real life and her user pages are regularly vandalized...
Click to read more »--Scientificboy1 (talk) 13:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC) Administrator note: CheckUser strike applied. Operator873 connect 19:07, 20 April 2022 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »17:23, 15 November 2011 (UTC) If it helps, as part of my return periodic checkuser... err, checks, were performed upon me and have proved negative. Although...
Click to read more »request to a CheckUser. Calm the discussion by encouraging editors not to speculate and to wait for proper review. Request for checkuser to verify the...
Click to read more »the future: write a mail to the checkuser list? But as long as there is no sign of abuse, there is no need for a checkuser action Eptalon (talk) 11:15, 19...
Click to read more »--NepaliUser007 (talk) 09:59, 20 October 2020 (UTC) {{{1}}} Administrator note: CheckUser strike Operator873talkconnect 14:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC) Keep - I would...
Click to read more »enough activity to get the required support for a new oversighter or checkuser at the moment, if there's not 25 by next Monday. Justarandomamerican (Discuss...
Click to read more »2409:4063:4214:34bc::2176:d8b1 (talk • contribs) 12:50, 1 June 2020 (UTC) CheckUser Comment - Votes struck based on technical evidence of abuse. Operator873talkconnect...
Click to read more »hope to continue gaining knowledge, trust, and skill necessary to pursue CheckUser and Oversight. From a technical standpoint, I believe I have the skill...
Click to read more »accounts to avoid semi-protection, you will likely be caught by a CheckUser. CheckUser is a tool that can help find accounts that belong to the same person...
Click to read more »May 2023 (UTC) Administrator note: Moved to correct section and applied CheckUser strike. Operator873 connect 20:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »privacy). This information is NOT the kind of stuff related to checks by checkusers or similar, nor is it confidential information such as street addresses...
Click to read more »While I, as a Checkuser can make a link between a named user an an an IP address, I am not allowed to tell anyone. And secondly, the checkuser policy forbids...
Click to read more »Oversighters, Simple English Wikipedia's checkusers do not have a shared checkuser email. A mailing list for checkusers or a VRT queue for simplewiki IPBEs...
Click to read more »desperate to keep that power all to yourself. You nominated yourself for CheckUser ostensibly to avoid power abuses, but you don't want any other project...
Click to read more »24 January 2024 (UTC) (Note) This is related to Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#Christian_Joy_Lorenzo_Bautista. MathXplore (talk) 11:18, 24 January 2024...
Click to read more »to be a checkuser, but was not promoted. Congratulations Chenzw! - For passing a request for bureaucratship! Vector applied to be a checkuser, but was...
Click to read more »changed. -- Da Punk '95 talk 20:46, 21 July 2008 (UTC) Futhermore, CheckUser over here proved I did not use muplital accounts to oppose a RfA, as accussed...
Click to read more »Therefore, I will request that administrators do not close this RfD until a CheckUser has responded to the request. Thank you, Vermont (talk) 11:06, 25 February...
Click to read more »Wikipedia via a checkuser block. The checkuser who performed the block did not name the connected account nor is there an SPI; that checkuser (Ponyo) is currently...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:44, 3 February 2025 (UTC) Thanks. I am not a checkuser, so I will let the checkuser process handle the others. -- Auntof6 (talk) 22:45, 3 February...
Click to read more »bureaucrat (and former oversighter) on the English Wikipedia, a bureaucrat and CheckUser on the English Wikiquote, a bureaucrat on Wikispecies (though I'm largely...
Click to read more »nominating Fr33kman for adminship. Fr33kman was an admin, oversighter, checkuser and bureaucrat until 2014, when his rights were removed for inactivity...
Click to read more »for checkuser page, I see that most requests get handled by two or perhaps three checkusers. We are all volunteers, abd I think another checkuser might...
Click to read more »(UTC) Good morning simpleadmins! I am an admin and checkuser on enwiki, and processed a checkuser request/sockpuppet investigation this morning in which...
Click to read more »why we shouldn't be worried about giving this right to someone who's checkuser-blocked on enwiki? --Auntof6 (talk) 22:10, 19 July 2022 (UTC) @Auntof6...
Click to read more »above Mulairi (talk) 17:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC) Administrator note: CheckUser strike applied Operator873 connect 02:53, 26 October 2022 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »(talk) 00:05, 25 March 2024 (UTC) QD G5 case (Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archive22#Christian_Joy_Lorenzo_Bautista), but QD tag removal is being...
Click to read more »Auntof6 (talk) 06:56, 10 October 2024 (UTC) (Non-checkuser observation) @Auntof6: m:CheckUser_policy#CheckUser_status says information is only stored for a...
Click to read more »right place? See WP:AN to speak to an administrator. See WP:RFCU for CheckUser requests. See WP:OS for oversight. See WP:RFRB to request the rollback...
Click to read more »Wikipedia (Paul 012) that it may have been edited by the sockpuppet. Although CheckUser stated that Yosakrai is not likely to be related to the sockpuppet (at...
Click to read more »Created by sock of User:Yilangderen Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#Yilangderen "Checkuser shows nothing fr33kman 14:53, 13 August 2025 (UTC)". Malairen...
Click to read more »projects (en:wikt:, d:) and smaller ones (s:mul:, v:en:). I also have CheckUser on species: and am a bureaucrat on outreach:. I hope that users can take...
Click to read more »with notifying editors after you undo edits. This combined with your checkuser block on the English Wikipedia brings me enough doubt to believe you are...
Click to read more »the editor immediately took me to WP:RFCU (See Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#PotsdamLamb) for absolutely no reason or even researching anything. They...
Click to read more »IP. MathXplore (talk) 08:24, 22 March 2023 (UTC) Administrator note: CheckUser Strikes applied. IP editors don't get !votes. Like will attract more UPE/Spam...
Click to read more »~2026-14136-31 (talk) 08:26, 5 March 2026 (UTC) Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#Yeatglazer and meta:Steward_requests/Global#Global_block_for_sockpuppets_of_Steven1991...
Click to read more »18:38, 26 July 2023 (UTC) If you have some evidence you can ask for a checkuser to be done. It might make sense to make a block workable especially if...
Click to read more »March 2015 (UTC) I have blocked all 3 accounts here. As confirmed by CheckUser, this is one person operating DunDunDunt, TheGhostEffectz, and Publiology...
Click to read more »LWCU, thanks Cactus spiky ouch 04:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC) LWCU = Loginwiki CheckUser MathXplore (talk) 06:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC) thanks Cactus🌵 spiky ouch...
Click to read more »talk 18:12, 26 July 2008 (UTC) With that logic, only M7 would be left as CheckUser. Do you really think that'd be a good idea? - Who answered the last few...
Click to read more »checkuser (log)) Jayden Johnson 2314 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) Spencer2343 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »LTA vandal from English Wikipedia. I posted some more details on the CheckUser mailing list if you have access to it. Please block for at least several...
Click to read more »not use multiple accounts. Psl85 Talk 07:18, 2 March 2018 (UTC) I trust Checkuser activities and as a Computer student, they obviously traced your account...
Click to read more »why we shouldn't be worried about giving this right to someone who's checkuser-blocked on enwiki? --Auntof6 (talk) 22:10, 19 July 2022 (UTC) @Auntof6...
Click to read more »Bobherry Talk My Changes 21:38, 15 September 2023 (UTC) This was put up for Checkuser attention, should they chose to do anything about it, and has been noted...
Click to read more »Cactus🌵 spiky ツ 08:41, 16 January 2025 (UTC) Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archive22 appears in Category:Pages where template include size is exceeded...
Click to read more »areas of QDs, RfDs, blocks, user mediation and stopping edit wars. and checkuser activity. I have also authored multiple quidelines that are used daily...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:26, 10 May 2021 (UTC) Change being made: Requester was a checkuser block. Description: Not done Da LambTalk to me!OMG, What have I done...
Click to read more »feature is being abused. It is possible for users able to access the CheckUser tool to confirm if and when a user sent any emails, but not the content...
Click to read more »shifting the deletion request here. Related: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser#Alireza-Jadidi accounts. – Cyber.Eyes.2005Talk 17:29, 3 September 2024...
Click to read more »evasion. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:02, 4 February 2023 (UTC) Administrator note: CheckUser strike applied along with confirming Auntof6's strikes as CU confirmed...
Click to read more »Opposite Tag Renders {{2O}} 2nd opinion requested —N/a {{8ball}} The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says: —N/a {{A note}} Note: —N/a {{Accepted}} Accepted {{Agree}}...
Click to read more »Eyes2005Talk 15:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC) QD G5 case, Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archive22#Christian_Joy_Lorenzo_Bautista. Please take care of this page...
Click to read more »though I don't think I can say who it is without violating the global CheckUser policy. Thanks. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC) Done...
Click to read more »RfDs and the like. I have two accounts myself. Official statement by checkuser fr33kman 23:52, 28 December 2024 (UTC) A lot of the time only the second...
Click to read more »authentication) on all wikis. This permission is only assigned to users that have CheckUser or Oversight rights on at least one wiki or are global sysops, per the...
Click to read more »shortcuts for Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress, Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser, and [Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]. Bensebgli (Talk) 15:29,...
Click to read more »the tagging fr33kman 17:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC) also if ya know any checkusers on this site can you ask if they can check this "zepez" person? i have...
Click to read more »correlation of two named users, you can also lit them at thre request for checkuser page. Eptalon (talk) 22:49, 12 January 2025 (UTC) K. BigKrow (talk) 22:50...
Click to read more »that give a user the ability to take actions related to users (admin, checkuser, etc.). -- Auntof6 (talk) 20:07, 11 May 2023 (UTC) Could an admin please...
Click to read more »your only edit. So without any other comment, I will be submitting a checkuser account as a sockpuppet. Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't...
Click to read more »policy. fr33kman 20:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC) Let me add to that that as checkusers, we are forbidden from linking usernames with IP adresses; we can't comment...
Click to read more »wikipedia requires adminship for other, more advanced privileges (bureaucrat, checkuser, oversighter; for CU and OS there are extra requirements imposed by MetaWiki)...
Click to read more »information to the public. This entails two things: Firstly, oversighters and checkusers have signed this, and if I read the statemet correctly, they think that...
Click to read more »than reverting edits I wouldn't get involved. Leave it to the admins and checkusers. fr33kman 19:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC) This discussion should be moved...
Click to read more »you have a suspicion, you can crete a request on this page. One of the checkusers will then look into the matter, and perform the relevantchecks. Eptalon...
Click to read more »rights policy Advanced user groups Administrators RfA Bureaucrats RfB Interface administrators CheckUser and Oversight Category: Policies / Guidelines...
Click to read more »in Nuevo León Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Category:Checkuser blocked Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Category:Empires in the Middle...
Click to read more »Hello everyone, This is a notice regarding an ongoing data migration on Wikidata that may affect your election-related templates and Lua modules (such...
Click to read more »