Redirect to:
this way. CheckUser requests can be made at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. Presently, there are 6 CheckUsers. See Special:ListUsers/checkuser for an automatically...
Click to read more »WP:RFCUWP:RFCU WP:SPIWP:SPI CheckUser is the process of checking information about two or more users (including named users and temporary accounts). Some...
Click to read more »See Special:ListUsers/patroller for a list of the 148 new page reviewers. Users who are given the checkuser flag ('checkuser' user group) have access...
Click to read more »WP:RFCUWP:RFCU WP:SPIWP:SPI CheckUser is the process of checking information about two or more users (including named users and temporary accounts). Some...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) I'm not that familiar with the CheckUser policy, but I'm sure this doesn't warrant a checkuser. Oysterguitarist 19:46, 23 December 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) This user may be related to these collection of IP's, see...
Click to read more »block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) 121.54.64.36 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) The "Disney Anon" (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) 2010 Former (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) IntoxicatorMan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) DarkType (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log ·...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) 18Weaver (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log ·...
Click to read more »block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Egypt Freak II (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) 92.15.33.16 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) (sock master) Sludge Monster (talk+ · tag · contribs ·...
Click to read more »block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) 24.139.162.124 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Jaleh B (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log ·...
Click to read more »block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) 68.220.173.9 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »an archive of past Requests for CheckUser action. Do not make any changes to this page. For new requests please see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser....
Click to read more »contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) IP range 131.123.0.0/16 This user's changes are very similar to edits...
Click to read more »fr33kman 16:49, 24 September 2024 (UTC) The check users are a group of admins who are given access to the check user toolset to use in cases of vandalism, cross-wiki...
Click to read more »block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) 108.192.73.8 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »investigating sockpuppetry. The full requirements for CheckUsers are listed on the CheckUser policy page. CheckUsers must be at least 18 years old and a legal adult...
Click to read more »block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Jacob Louis Mathew (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Kangaroo Research Foundation (talk+ · tag · contribs ·...
Click to read more »SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Though I may be a little bit paranoid, I would like to check and make sure that these are not the same users. Cheers, Razorflame...
Click to read more »Requesting for CheckUser on the following users, reason because this user just registered newly and has started editing like pros, i think this users might has...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Amongusches (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) 2010 Former (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Privatenetwork57 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) I'm not that familiar with the CheckUser policy, but I'm sure this doesn't warrant a checkuser. Oysterguitarist 19:46, 23 December 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) CiteMaster (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Namo goran (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) 92.15.33.16 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Bhoomikaso11 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »Foundation. CheckUser on this wiki is identical in every way to enwiki. Seconly, I am very accessible on IRC, via e-mail and on my enwiki user talk page...
Click to read more »contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Block/Lock evasion See Special:Diff/9452242; also...
Click to read more »meta:Steward requests/Username changes to change your user name or take another user name. See WP:RFCU for CheckUser requests. See WP:OS for oversight. Hey admins...
Click to read more »user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) 2402:E000:649:565B:0:0:0:1 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user ·...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Pplkhhb (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log ·...
Click to read more »page is the page at User:Example (or Special:Mypage) Your user talk page is the page at User talk:Example (or Special:Mytalk) Your user subpages are pages...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Gk0094 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log ·...
Click to read more »user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Badrul Bambang Sucaksono (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user ·...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Qeenyoy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log ·...
Click to read more »block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Yourplacetime (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Taylor J Marshall (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) EwwyCat (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log ·...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Adjoasimple (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »to a user. A user talk page is a kind of talk page that has the user's user name at the end of the "User talk:" part. For example, if your user name is...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Han Tae-Sul (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Okaydude2323$ (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) I have other Tas to compare them to but since there...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Esiimana (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log ·...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Koradass (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log ·...
Click to read more »If a user seems to be misusing several accounts and/or committing sockpuppetry, you can ask a CheckUser to confirm this by adding the username on the WP:RFCU...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Jaggtu (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log ·...
Click to read more »September 2007 (UTC) You now have checkUser access. Please subscribe to checkUser-l, the private mailing list for checkUsers. If you use IRC, you can contact...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Pzhvbilla$ (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »Users involved: The OSINT Guy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) HarryinLondon...
Click to read more »block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Monday4real1995 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) - new account Junoh Boy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user ·...
Click to read more »block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Aliraza77777 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Sharinkurani (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) The Unknown Explorer (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »September 2007 (UTC) You now have checkUser access. Please subscribe to checkUser-l, the private mailing list for checkUsers. If you use IRC, you can contact...
Click to read more »/ Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer There are many kinds of special permissions that users can...
Click to read more »Since CheckUser permission requires 25 votes, I'd like to throw my name in as an option. I'm quite familiar with CheckUser itself, as well as other tools...
Click to read more »data provided from the checkuser interface may assist a checkuser in separating the users? A: There are three parts to the checkuser interface; 1) Get IPs...
Click to read more »changes. If the meta:Checkuser tool was used to determine that sockpuppetry had occurred, only another administrator with access to Checkuser can overturn the...
Click to read more »block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Coughing hydrogen (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) MinaShaban7 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »comments; anything else you'd like to say? Should I mention that I'm a new CheckUser? Thanks for your time, Brian. Join us next time for another interview...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) VikRagnarr (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »it. Candidate declined nomination. I would like to nominate Tygrrr for checkuser status because he has been very active lately, and he has been a major...
Click to read more »amongst the most active admins we have. I think she would make a good checkuser. --Eptalon 21:55, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Candidate's Acceptance Tygrrr...
Click to read more »sometimes there's sockpuppetry going on late at night. I am willing to be a CheckUser here at Simple Wikipedia because I think I have what it takes. I am over...
Click to read more »remain Shamitaly (talk) 15:24, 22 November 2022 (UTC) Administrator note: CheckUser strike Operator873 connect 20:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC) Delete Yet again...
Click to read more »log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) AdhyaEditor (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block...
Click to read more »Support - Although not the most active of users, I trust vector and Think he would make a more than capable checkuser. IuseRosary? (talk) 19:29, 16 March 2008...
Click to read more »contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) - new account ~2026-42589-81 (talk+ · tag · contribs ·...
Click to read more »inactive checkusers, especially. — RyanCross (talk) 17:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Weak Oppose I've thought about this, and CheckUser is the user right where...
Click to read more »two CheckUsers on a wiki, there will be no CheckUser on that wiki. Editors will have to ask a Steward to check if UserX is a sockpuppet of UserY. To...
Click to read more »note of that. Chenzw Talk 04:48, 20 October 2008 (UTC) Checkuser results from a recent check brought up issue which makes me vote oppose. Also, only...
Click to read more »29 April 2020 (UTC) Question: You noticed some excessive checking by another checkuser, (i.e. more accounts than needed / more ranges than needed)...
Click to read more »abuse this privilege, and would ask the other Checkuser admin(s) on any questionable issues. Excellent user and admin. Definitely deserves our trust....
Click to read more »to Wikipedia RFCU Typically said in conversations relating to sockpuppets. The full meaning is request for checkuser. Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser...
Click to read more »user on his or her user talk page. User warnings are for preventing further vandalism and/or disruptive changing, and not to punish users. If a user stopped...
Click to read more »Oversight and Checkuser more helpful and necessary then it normally would be on a wiki our size. I've done quite a few Requests for checkuser in the past...
Click to read more »Barras (talk · contribs) I wish to propose that Barras be added to our checkuser team. I am confident that Barras has the technical know-how, trust, and...
Click to read more »in this respect, and of course of the CheckUser policy, both of which I will fully respect if/when I make checks. Additionally, I was one of the original...
Click to read more »everyone's participation. I recognise I don't have the required support to checkuser. At four opposes, there is a probability that I will not receive the required...
Click to read more »unsigned comment added by Adfromindia (talk • contribs) Administrator note: CheckUser strike Operator873 connect 06:53, 30 November 2022 (UTC) Keep Yes Article...
Click to read more »request, The admin noticeboard), I would also like to nominate myself for a CheckUser. Again, this is done to give people a choice. If they then feel that one...
Click to read more »you check just because a user is new and you have a "hunch"? Checkuser is not for "fishing trips". There should be a reason to check. ie the new user is...
Click to read more »things to consider: according to meta:CheckUser policy#Access to checkuser, 1. As of 11 April 2007, Checkusers must be 18 years of age, of legal age in...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer Since I am no longer going to...
Click to read more »number of votes recommended for Checkuser by the policy, I would like to propose The Rambling Man for promotion to CheckUser. Congratulations. --Eptalon (talk)...
Click to read more »this redirect page can be restored as a real article again (it used to be, check history) because other projects don't redirect to the original. There could...
Click to read more »pages in the Talk:, User talk:, and Wikipedia talk: namespaces. To sign a post, type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. For example, if User:Example writes a...
Click to read more »was to Delete. MathXplore (talk) 06:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC) Category:Checkuser blocked (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close...
Click to read more »changes) for the position of checkuser. Peter has many unique qualities that lend to wards him becoming a good checkuser. Firstly, he is very active,...
Click to read more »time, consider asking a user with checkuser access to check for collateral damage - that is, for the presence of other users who may be unintentionally...
Click to read more »when blocking users for inappropriate usernames. PullToOpenTalk 05:52, 2 January 2007 (UTC) User:Bobo now unblocked, CheckUser shows that user is not a Kimberly...
Click to read more »if a CheckUser does not meet that without giving to the community prior notice of their expected inactivity, they would be removed as a checkuser. This...
Click to read more »An RFCU is a "Request for Checkuser". It is my request to a special type of staff member here who can check whether users are connected to each other...
Click to read more »this help I've learned that Brian has both the technical knowledge of checkuser and sockpuppetry and the logical knowledge of when it should be performed...
Click to read more »and village pump. For more specific requests, go to SPI (Requests for checkuser), AIV (Vandalism in progress) and the Administrators' noticeboard. #wikipedia-simple...
Click to read more »namespace. Fact checking is time-consuming and not particularly rewarding. It is unfair to make later editors dig for sources to check your work, particularly...
Click to read more »these users; some of them are listed below. You should always look at what is already on that page as well as the user's other changes (you can check them...
Click to read more »review but it is very notable.--Ducdo929 (talk) 05:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC) CheckUser strike. Operator873 connect 05:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC) KEEP There are...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »become a Checkuser. It is not a discussion on the appropriate number of Checkusers, or to compare these numbers to the number of CheckUsers other wikis...
Click to read more »existing inactive admins policy – the two checkusers inactive for the moment have done an exceptional amount of CheckUser work in the fairly recent past and...
Click to read more »meta:Steward requests/Username changes to change your user name or take another user name. See WP:RFCU for CheckUser requests. See WP:OS for oversight....
Click to read more »I think that I can now be trusted with CheckUser information, and if I'm not online, I'm just an email away. Strong Support. Archer7 has been active,...
Click to read more »something. This helps people to communicate and to keep records. You can have a user page with the title of your username, and also a talk page, where people...
Click to read more »/ Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer There are many kinds of special permissions that users can...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer Voting for removal of sysop rights...
Click to read more »changing password Special:CheckUser, Check user. Available only to users with the CheckUser right. Special:CheckUserLog, CheckUser log Special:CiteThisPage...
Click to read more »--Alexandravela0614 (talk) 05:06, 14 May 2023 (UTC) Administrator note: CheckUser strike Operator873 connect 01:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC) KeepHas good references...
Click to read more »to check for appropriateness, so only limited help is possible if the feature is being abused. It is possible for users able to access the CheckUser tool...
Click to read more »rules. There are currently 10 users with the temporary account viewer permission locally. Much like with the checkuser right this permission has restrictions...
Click to read more »judge a editor and vote in a RfA with a support vote saying they are a CheckUser on another Wikimedia project, but an editor may not vote in a RfA with...
Click to read more »many CheckUsers, checking someone's IP address is a sensitive issue to me. Hydriz (talk) 08:19, 17 November 2010 (UTC) It is an abuse of checkuser privileges...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) UPDATE: see en:Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ForestH2. With this confirmation, User:ForestH2 should now be considered banned from Simple...
Click to read more »should unprotect User talk:Inkpen2 and set an example for the English Wikipedia. I also propose that a checkuser other than Creol check the IPs to confirm...
Click to read more »that meets one of the quick deletion criteria, administrators must always check the page's edit history to see if the page can be reverted to an earlier...
Click to read more »Wikipedia, many people work together to make an encyclopedia. Sometimes, users do not agree on what is written in an article, or on a talk page. Rather...
Click to read more »history unless problems happen again. Blocks can apply to a user account, temporary user, an IP, or a range of IPs. A number of automated features identify...
Click to read more »one was mine and one was a re-promotion, 3 Bureaucrat promotions, and 2 CheckUser promotions. In addition, there has been one re-confirmation and one de-sysopping...
Click to read more »needed to confirm same user but it's fairly obvious without one. - EchoBravo contribs 15:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC) I have done a CheckUser on them. This came...
Click to read more »a Checkuser, Bureaucrat and Admin here. I am over 18, and willing to identify towards the foundation; I have already done this to become CheckUser. So...
Click to read more »given. Vector (talk · contribs) I would like to nominate myself for a CheckUser, I'm also a sysop and a bureaucrat here but I think that I could help...
Click to read more »However, sometimes different users may have different ideas on how to make Wikipedia better, so arguments can happen. As users argue, they may find it hard...
Click to read more »accounts for 5 of the 58 entries listed. Even without checking (26 seperate full range checkuser scans) for effects of collateral damage from a move this...
Click to read more »--NepaliUser007 (talk) 09:59, 20 October 2020 (UTC) {{{1}}} Administrator note: CheckUser strike Operator873talkconnect 14:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC) Keep - I would...
Click to read more »need the tool to do the job properly. I am an experienced checkuser having been a checkuser on this project from 2009 for over four years and a steward...
Click to read more »pages that need to be fixed. This is not as helpful, because most users do not check the list of unreferenced pages for work to do. If an article looks...
Click to read more »Special:ListUsers/checkuser This page is a soft redirect....
Click to read more »*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 09:11, 30 November 2024 (UTC) Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archives (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close...
Click to read more »that the user edits in good faith, and he also supported my own RfA. But I must say that the reply to Operator873 is very concerning. A CheckUser block should...
Click to read more »date started at my settings. You can see also check this information for your account, or any other user here. The edit count may be lower as it does not...
Click to read more »editors make very similar bad edits. This sometimes cause a request for a Checkuser. If it is really obvious that the edits are being made by the same person...
Click to read more »(UTC) That, and a resident checkuser, ought to nip this problem in the bud. Only problem is, we still don't have a checkuser, to say for 100% sure what...
Click to read more »figure it can't hurt to have one more. Although I'm not "always online", I check my watchlist at least daily and continue to be active in discussions. Candidate's...
Click to read more »Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 21:42, 22 February 2019 (UTC) User:The Three Headed Knight/NHL check (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)...
Click to read more »requested Checkuser, but should we deal with this? -- Da Punk '95 talk 20:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Sorry, Simple11 didn't control that user. Please ignore...
Click to read more »(Discuss) After proposing the merge, put your reasons on the talk page and check back in a few days for answers from other editors. If there is no disagreement...
Click to read more »up a lot of my onwiki time. I am therefore offering to step down as a checkuser on simplewiki in order for Djsasso to take up the role instead. This is...
Click to read more »January 2008 (UTC) At the moment we do not have much info. CheckUser reports this as a first time user; but the tool has its limits). For the time I would make...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:FULLWP:FULL WP:GOLDLOCKWP:GOLDLOCK Full protection stops users from changing pages unless they are administrators. An administrator can...
Click to read more »nominated both RyanCross and Majorly for CheckUser. I was also thinking about nominating Synergy for Checkuser as well. Cheers, Razorflame 17:40, 29 January...
Click to read more »difficult users. Instead, keep a list of users who insult you, noting the date and type of insult. If those same people insult you again, check the difference...
Click to read more »ask a steward. I feel oversight would be very useful while working as a checkuser in several cases, such as last night. I'm on IRC most of the day so readily...
Click to read more »Special:ShortPages (sometimes, the article has not been marked a stub) You can also check Category:Stubs and the subcategories there to find articles that have been...
Click to read more »will be deleted as G3. There were also socking issues here, fortunately checkuser was available to me. This RFD can be closed G6, fr33kman 11:28, 3 August...
Click to read more »A Wikipedia gadget is a JavaScript user script that can be enabled simply by checking an option in your Wikipedia settings. Installed gadgets are also...
Click to read more »user:Antonious07 user:jxh444 user:MrkMobo user:Laura200856 user:Weng8 user:20chseld309 user:21chseld301 user:21chseld302 user:21chseld303 user:21chseld304 user:21chseld305...
Click to read more »Juliancolton Hello fr33kman, thank you for joining us! You're an admin, checkuser, and bureaucrat here on the Simple English Wikipedia, but tell us a bit...
Click to read more »these. The templates here are used to welcome users, warn vandals and other templates that should go on a user's talk page. This is the place for any templates...
Click to read more »renamed to User:^(impersonator-1). - Huji reply 16:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC) Creol blcoked a rather broad IP range (66.174.0.0/16) after his checkuser investigations...
Click to read more »oppose their closure. Demote Netoholic to a normal registered user (including no CheckUser rights), and block him for 3 months. Promote one of our admins...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Privacy policy Wikipedia:Office actions These are rules about how users should act. Wikipedia:Blocks and bans Wikipedia:Copyrights Wikipedia:Deletion...
Click to read more »Administrator note: CheckUser strike applied. Operator873 connect 03:35, 5 September 2022 (UTC) Whenever many inexperienced users support to keep, this...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) How do I check? Or is it an admin/'crat only thing? Griffinofwales (talk) 19:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC) I performed a checkuser on the IP address...
Click to read more »oversighters and checkuser tools. I don't want to bring this up on the RFA page as it is not a discussion for there. I am going to support the users at RFA currently...
Click to read more »been nominated for Bureaucrat; Vector and Tygrrr have been nominated for CheckUser. If you are interested in voting or voicing your opiniion, please do that...
Click to read more »CheckUser, not a Bureaucrat. CheckUsers can check where users log in from; this can be very useful for fighting vandals. Bureaucrats can rename users...
Click to read more »articles, and other publications is properly referenced. The article checks out all the check marks from what I can see. I've simplified the article, expanded...
Click to read more »from editing for any period at any time. While this may affect legitimate users, they are not the intended targets and may freely use proxies until those...
Click to read more »transwiki import tool will take care of the attribution for you. All other users must move pages manually. For manual moves, see the instructions below....
Click to read more »checks both this page and the user's configuration subpage when starting up. Settings available to individual users become the default for all users if...
Click to read more »go against the idea of consensus, users who take part in an edit war can be blocked. This usually happens if the user reverts (changes the page back) more...
Click to read more »encyclopedia. The Simple English Wikipedia is not a place for blocked or banned users to try to get unblocked or unbanned from another website. The Simple English...
Click to read more »good standing is allowed to close check-usership and oversighter requests, as only stewards are able to promote users to those positions. They do not have...
Click to read more »presumably the user could have been using it to build the encyclopedia. That said, there is a separate sock puppet issue that a checkuser or other appropriate...
Click to read more »search for reliable sources. (See step D.) Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing. Read the article's talk page for...
Click to read more »his page, ran a WHOIS check and tracked it down to his ISP in his area. Can't be anyone else. Blocked User:Liberator and User:Liberator1 indefinitely...
Click to read more »(talk • contribs) 21:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC) Strike out as user is a confirmed check user sock puppet PotsdamLamb (talk) 04:39, 1 March 2021 (UTC) Social...
Click to read more »user. I don't think there's a point in tagging and/or tracking blocked and locked users with their respective templates. It's not that hard to check that...
Click to read more »accounts to avoid semi-protection, you will likely be caught by a CheckUser. CheckUser is a tool that can help find accounts that belong to the same person...
Click to read more »one which does not miss any major facts and details.? Right now, if you check the English Wikipedia article, which is also a featured article, then it...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »has been ongoing for a little while now. We had a steward check our logs based on Checkuser-l discussions of the cross-wiki problem for details on Washing...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete per nominator, and the user is checkuser-blocked. 166.107.163.247 (talk) 20:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »Supportas nominator User is completely unknown to me; currently not an adnin either; I see little chance for them to be granted checkuser status; given that...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »long time to do without the bot. Bots perform their jobs under a different user name than the owner, so that it is easy to tell them apart. Also, bot edits...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »argument, the best way to solve the problem is to peer review the content, and check whether it's inaccurate. Once you've checked, edit the page to remove the...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »review of a deletion discussion is needed, please list it here and say why. Users can then comment to reach an agreement on whether the community thinks the...
Click to read more »the Main Page: Article talk page: ({{dyktalk}}) {{dyktalk|14 June|2026}} (check if small style templates in use, if so add the small=yes parameter) DYK...
Click to read more »track record here Most of their edits were to enwiki, where they are checkuser blocked -> only project with an established track record resulted in an...
Click to read more »(This exactly why we hardly allow a person to become a checkuser; a single mistake at the checkuser level can result in lots of headache). Unlike Nanochip08...
Click to read more »offering periodic Checkuser to check him and the one-strike rule. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 17:35, 27 July 2010 (UTC) Unfortunately Checkuser policy does not allow...
Click to read more »feature of MediaWiki, but mistakes can be easily made, even by experienced users. Complex templates should therefore be accompanied by sandboxes and test...
Click to read more »May 2023 (UTC) Administrator note: Moved to correct section and applied CheckUser strike. Operator873 connect 20:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC) This request is due...
Click to read more »for checkuser. One user, Jskskskk (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))...
Click to read more »viewers. Users with some extended rights like administrators and CheckUsers, as well as users in the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user group, are...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »just like here. I think so, might be Sockpuppet user here to help each other always. Can CheckUser check it? — Masum Ibn Musa Conversation 11:02, 19 January...
Click to read more »probably did (they no longer have that system). Since sockpuppet and CheckUser-alert banners don't actually sort pages to CAT:TWU, it's only if the page...
Click to read more »You're way too proficient at markup to be a new user, so you're not fooling anyone - shall we get a checkuser? -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:21, 6 July...
Click to read more »Wikipedia as web host. Also see relevant case at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser#Grammeteo818. Chenzw Talk 16:20, 1 March 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »do you get up to online or offline, other than Wikipedia? I read mail; I check a few of my favorite web sites; thats about it. Offline: I sometimes go...
Click to read more »creating user accounts. Is there a way to verify this? What should be done to these accounts? Chenzw Talk 07:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC) Checkuser should...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »Since Majorly did the original block, he would know better. Other checkusers could check his IPs that were used then to show he was snow funn still. I don't...
Click to read more »Honest people disagree about complex topics. A Simple English Wikipedia user's point of view and idea of neutral is not always the same as that of a Simple...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Delete. Just for info: I ran a checkuser yesterday, and the two users in favor of keeping turned out to be the same. They have...
Click to read more »pages using rich media formats (which may not work with many users' settings and browsers). Check that the content type of the linked page is text/html, text/plain...
Click to read more »A checkuser should look into this instead. Chenzw Talk 12:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC) I believe the autoblock setting is turned on for these users. Versus22...
Click to read more »href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/User talk :Stefan Kühn/Check Wikipedia#check_69_on_en.wp">User talk :Stefan Kühn/Check Wikipedia#check_69_on_en.wp</a>. <br />...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer Several adminstrator accounts...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer...
Click to read more »contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) whom I blocked for a vandalism-only account. I believe...
Click to read more »contribs · logs · block log) - indef ban: (En:wp user was informed of probable impersonation), User matches checkuser profile but also has other details. No vandalism...
Click to read more »damages by a compromised admin account, worse if it is a bureaucrat or checkuser since you said that an unnoticing active admin has their password hacked...
Click to read more »7 August 2009 (UTC) 1. The user is a sock. 2. Socking is banned here too, so should we should request a checkuser to check if socking ever occurred here...
Click to read more »bureaucrat (and former oversighter) on the English Wikipedia, a bureaucrat and CheckUser on the English Wikiquote, a bureaucrat on Wikispecies (though I'm largely...
Click to read more »your own name for serious consideration. I really think we need to get a checkuser here on some of these accounts... Blockinblox 03:15, 21 September 2006...
Click to read more »For this issue, Juliancolton interviewed one of Wikipedia's administrators and checkusers, Jamesofur (talk · contribs). Juliancolton: Hi Jamesofur, thank you for...
Click to read more »desperate to keep that power all to yourself. You nominated yourself for CheckUser ostensibly to avoid power abuses, but you don't want any other project...
Click to read more »the most recent line of history to be imported over. Be cautious to not check the box to bring all the templates over, this feature will overwrite many...
Click to read more »That was part of why I indeffed the user. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC) I have requested a CheckUser for this case. This looks suspicious...
Click to read more »being a disruption. His actions caused nearly every active admin, 'crat, checkuser, and several editors to stop what they were doing to deal with the issues...
Click to read more »v:en:). I also have CheckUser on species: and am a bureaucrat on outreach:. I hope that users can take a look at my work with the user permissions on those...
Click to read more »Several channels are restricted in who can join them; there's also one for checkusers, one for stewards. As a comparison: Mail is transferred as plain text...
Click to read more »User talk:Relayballleague. Nigos (talk | changes) 13:40, 18 December 2021 (UTC) Pinging RelayballG12, Auntof6 Djsasso could you do a checkuser on them...
Click to read more »15 July 2008 (UTC) Has multiple accounts User:Altwiki was the one who caused this issue. Perhaps a checkuser is in order. -Djsasso (talk) 14:23, 15 July...
Click to read more »(>58,000 articles), it doesn't hurt to have a few more admins. I've been a user on Simple English Wikipedia for some time now and have over 1200 edits. These...
Click to read more »ks also to Bsadowski for the checkuser results. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:57, 14 March 2014 (UTC) May I draw attention to user:SemenStain, whose handle and...
Click to read more »"Hankaplan"). Do you have checkuser capability locally? Antandrus (talk) 00:58, 25 April 2018 (UTC) Hi. I'm bringing you the IP User:2600:100D:B102:C6FC:284F:D63C:33CE:3E92...
Click to read more »language used is neutral and factual. User:Boldcable 01:21, 04 August 2025 (UTC). Note - I asked for a checkuser related to the three accounts that have...
Click to read more »the list: User:Stmaryscps/AEPoplar User:Stmaryscps/ALPoplar User:Stmaryscps/APPoplar User:Stmaryscps/CBPoplar User:Stmaryscps/CMPoplar User:Stmaryscps/EAPoplar...
Click to read more »contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)). Exert 23:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC) ┌───────────────────────┘...
Click to read more »the case of an established user and after carefully looking into the situation. Either the steward who blocked or a checkuser should be contacted before...
Click to read more »without getting caught at User:Kalajan/templates. Makes you wonder whose puppet Kalajan is. Too bad you can't use checkuser without evidence of who the...
Click to read more »accurate. I don't know a way to check whether a user actually is online, but a spot check shows that several of the users in this category have not edited...
Click to read more »electing him to the role of CheckUser (which he aloready had, about a decade ago). So, without going into detail: A checkuser can look up the ip adress(es)...
Click to read more »I would google it and see if there's any hits about it. If not, I would check en. If nothing there, delete it as hoax or nonsense etc. If there is something...
Click to read more »We at the Simple English Wikipedia are made up of many users who write this encyclopedia. Some of them know more about certain subjects or topics and...
Click to read more »January 2021 (UTC) Noting that the above user was indefinitely blocked by an administrator per a checkuser investigation. --IWI (talk) 21:04, 31 January...
Click to read more »User:castilibrary7 User:librarycasti4 User:librarycasti5 User:librarycasti6 User:librarycasti7 User:castilibrary8 User:castilibrary9 User:librarycasti8 User:librarycasti9...
Click to read more »revealed. It is also possible for the user who left the account to start a new one. This can occur if the user wishes to have a clean start, has forgotten...
Click to read more »Just a thought, but perhaps we should clear user warnings that are over a year old and effectively stale, especially with dynamic IP ranges? Some IP talk...
Click to read more »where one could get data on checkuser abuse/misuse/violation (personal information about one user coming from a checkuser to the rest of the internet...
Click to read more »or CheckUser, etc. would obviously have their rights removed immediately. But when other users will search for people in the user list for users having...
Click to read more »always has to be a reason covered by the policy to perfom a check. Note that checkusers and oversighters have a legal obligation to keep such information...
Click to read more »admins and checkusers, most of these disruptions have been taken care of. In the past, there were several debates as of how to handle such users (i.e., Benninguy...
Click to read more »that an admin, crat or checkuser would get a mail with more information, and could then act accordingly. As you know, CheckUsers are bound by the privacy...
Click to read more »(for whatever reason he does it) and gets the bonus of annoying people. Checkuser and WP:Duck agree on it all being the same LTA editor. Then one day, an...
Click to read more »shouldn't, because checkusers can't link IPs to accounts publicly. --Ferien (talk) 16:13, 18 July 2022 (UTC) @Ferien However, they can still check to see if they...
Click to read more »(UTC) In general, checkuser questions can be answered with yes/no, and are of the form is user X the same as Y?- If you want a CheckUser, please report it...
Click to read more »20 November 2015 (UTC) ChenzwBot (previously User:Chris G Bot and User:GoblinBot4) works by checking edit diffs and edit summaries against a list of...
Click to read more »(here). No check to see if anyone agreed with this change. As a matter of fact, no edit at all betweein June 2006 and Nov 2008. So, a user took a personal...
Click to read more »cannot act on this. You may also want to refer this issue to a local checkuser. Chenzw Talk 14:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC) If those who've commented here...
Click to read more »mainstream newspapers. As a rule of thumb, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable...
Click to read more »would be highly unlikely for you to have a successful request. Usually users have three or more months of editing and 1000 + edits before having a successful...
Click to read more »--Kyoko 18:59, 17 May 2008 (UTC) I suggest a checkuser if any more accounts are created. Or maybe a checkuser is already in order. But whoever is creating...
Click to read more »revision IDs) should be automatically filled in. Check the appropriate boxes that apply to the user. Vandalism after final warning given - should be checked...
Click to read more »to the book. Same article on English wikipedia is about the book, if you check. Can anyone help me make that to an article on book? Or make an other article...
Click to read more »with a timer. For example, I could get the Checkuser for 10 minutes in an event of edit war through users and IPs. Once 10 minutes was over, I would automatically...
Click to read more »Cunkelfratz! 20:40, 12 July 2009 (UTC) I would agree. That is like the checkuser election policy here on simple. Barras (talk) 20:43, 12 July 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »editors. It is as unpleasant to harass a user with a history of poor or bad behavior as it is to harass any other user. Wikipedia encourages a civil community:...
Click to read more »19:10, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Sockpuppet of blocked user used to vote multiple times along with User Typhon in one of Razorflames RfAs. Another account...
Click to read more »instructed based on admin feedback. I want to check out their articles for another week or so before letting other users make edits. Also, we are going to do another...
Click to read more »this Big Weekend? I hope this time (the second time) we gather up more users for a fun weekend like this! --Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 06:40, 12...
Click to read more »(talk) 05:41, 21 December 2022 (UTC) A new account (already reported to checkuser, possible block evasion) has made this page which is related to Wikipedia:Requests...
Click to read more »personally trust Kennedy at the base, I cannot express this in a vote. I am a CheckUser, so voting would put me in a Conflict-of-Interest situation. But if people...
Click to read more »My question is twofold: What harm does it do to leave the tools with a user who is trusted, even if s/he is experiencing a period of inactivity; and...
Click to read more »multiple accounts on the BG7 account. Also, a CU is permitted by the checkuser policy to see if BG7 has in the past edited via school nodes. But that...
Click to read more »(UTC) Would someone look at User:Emre002? That's a brand new user page with claims of being an admin, bureaucrat, and checkuser, and of made various kinds...
Click to read more »least most of you) may know, I've been an oversighter, bureaucrat and checkuser here (RfO, RfB and RfCU). I dropped the crat and os rights quite some...
Click to read more »and 86 articles were skipped. At User:Auntof6/sandbox are some logs that may be of help to anyone wanting to check the ones that were skipped. Most of...
Click to read more »the gold star and you'll see the VG tag on the article in that language. Check out the article on Jimi Hendrix on ENWP and you'll see a lovely golden star...
Click to read more »of his history can be found here on en.. According to Lar, a checkuser on en., this user is a perpetual problem globally. The Sunstar NW XP vandal here...
Click to read more »no registered user has edited any articles. It detracts from this encyclopedia and aside from that all this discussion just gives the user attention which...
Click to read more »referring to a checkuser. Griffinofwales (talk) 11:41, 12 July 2014 (UTC) Alsatian (dog) and Bullmastiff have been targeted by indefinite blocked User:Looneyboy6...
Click to read more »is checkuser considered such a sensitive right? When anon editors edit, anyone can see their IP address. Why would finding the IP of a logged-in user be...
Click to read more »October 2022 (UTC) IP's are IP's. I do not think us regular users have access to checkuser tools. SoyokoAnis - talk 12:03, 13 October 2022 (UTC) Absolutely...
Click to read more »been blocked This is an interesting question. I would first request a checkuser with the suspected sockmaster (I don't actually know the exact term, but...
Click to read more »useful tool for checkusers to have here (like hiding things that were courtesy blanked, and userpages and user talk pages of banned users. I would like...
Click to read more »2409:4063:4214:34bc::2176:d8b1 (talk • contribs) 12:50, 1 June 2020 (UTC) CheckUser Comment - Votes struck based on technical evidence of abuse. Operator873talkconnect...
Click to read more »elected by the community via a request for oversightship. Per Foundation policy, a user must have at least 25 supports and a 70% consensus to be elected....
Click to read more »status for people monitoring bot flags and watching them. We have already checkusers (No! thanks) patrollers (I've not got enough time) and of course admins...
Click to read more »and you can check the table whenever you want a c-e. Thanks, Orashmatash 20:29, 24 October 2011 (UTC) How is this even assailable to users who has disabilities...
Click to read more »sockpuppet (SarahM is laso editing from the PurpleCloud address). To know how Checkuser works, please look at its usage policy. --Eptalon 22:38, 1 September 2007...
Click to read more »this tool at Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPageJSON. Once you download and install (see the AWB user manual for details), you must go to Options...
Click to read more »work. --Barras (talk) 21:23, 18 November 2009 (UTC) /me should not only check the edits when the RFA starts... --Barras (talk) 21:29, 18 November 2009...
Click to read more »shockpuppet here also check his talk page language as he used very bad language which is Wikipedia does not support (non respect to other users) and the person...
Click to read more »RFA, linked above. Cometstyles mentioned the checkuser request of User:Sam24. Sam24 voted against User:Cometstyles in his request for adminship, and...
Click to read more »known. If the user wants the data from the page, an admin can email it to him/her. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:50, 4 February 2016 (UTC) User:Waikikibeachbum/Sandbox...
Click to read more »Razorflame 22:13, 6 March 2009 (UTC) I just checked the Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser page and it's getting pretty full, is somebody gonna archive it any time...
Click to read more »hope more participates. Cheers, ♥ Belinda ♥ 08:51, 8 April 2010 (UTC) Checkuser and oversight are the ones that require twenty-five votes. RfA is whatever...
Click to read more »taking over wiki accounts with privileged user rights (for example, admins, bureaucrats, oversighters, checkusers). It appears that this may be because of...
Click to read more »useful tool for checkusers to have here (like hiding things that were courtesy blanked, and userpages and user talk pages of banned users. I would like...
Click to read more »user is not blocked, because he/she stopped; the user might come back for more. Cheers, PullToOpenTalk 04:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC) We can now check...
Click to read more »request for oversightship. Please do not modify it. Closed as successful. User promoted. --vector ^_^ (talk) 15:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Bluegoblin7 (talk...
Click to read more »explain the enwiki checkuser block. The nominator fails to answer about the concerns after the unilateral RFA activation (see my user talk page). If the...
Click to read more »this reason I only check C:QD every once in awhile each day. I am certainly not always checking it. I would be surprised if I check more than twice a day...
Click to read more »support votes, with a total of 70% support. I will also point out that both checkuser, and oversight are specialisations (in our wiki: of the administrator)...
Click to read more »It's an option in the drop down under VIP when reporting users. User page -> TW -> VIP -> check the box with Vandalism after recent (within 1 day) release...
Click to read more »by experts. Although readers might correct errors and some experts may check some articles, they do not have a duty to make changes. So, just because...
Click to read more »on AIM all day, so I can address oversightable items even if I'm not "checking" the project regularly (ie: looking at my watchlist or RC). Even when I'm...
Click to read more »Talk 16:05, 21 July 2008 (UTC) The current comment does not warrant a checkuser, sorry. --Eptalon (talk) 16:08, 21 July 2008 (UTC) Seriously that wasn't...
Click to read more »promoting the user anyway. At 81%, it is incredibly clear that the community was happy about this promotion. We currently allow CheckUsers and oversighters...
Click to read more »because of issues but am editing under this account in case someone runs a check" emails that pop up occasionally and which was all respect their privacy...
Click to read more »Special:Newpages right now is two days old. Okay, I know that new users don't check that, but still. Cassandra (talk) 06:17, 8 May 2008 (UTC) Does anyone...
Click to read more »crat), while uncapitalised userrights are those granted through meta (checkuser, oversight, import, etc). It's not just an enwiki thing (at least that's...
Click to read more »of trouble and cost a lot of money. Making a legal threat can make other users afraid to change pages, or make them angry at you. There are almost always...
Click to read more »factually incorrect. This is true for any resource. One should always double-check the accuracy of important facts, regardless of the source. In general, popular...
Click to read more »please check! Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:42, 13 July 2014 (UTC) It looks like the only thing that still needs updating is links to the redirect User:I-on/WikiProject...
Click to read more »many of the templates needed are listed at Wikipedia:User talk page warnings. You might want to check the documentation for an individual template to make...
Click to read more »ban, so it makes a difference. This is exactly the reason why we need checkusers. Blockinblox - talk 11:41, 24 September 2007 (UTC) You got on the defensive...
Click to read more »Commons, I believe it should be assigned by checkusers. We're still small, and the checkusers can check ranges for collateral damages without an issue...
Click to read more »:-) fr33kman t - c 03:33, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Article building? Ummm, check my sandbox. I'm not the best at copyediting, though. Thanks, though! SimonKSKContradict...
Click to read more »admin to becoming checkuser and oversighter within 8 months is extremely unusual. I can't think of any other user that has gained checkuser and oversighter...
Click to read more »(talk) 14:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC) Administrator note: Votes struck per CheckUser evidence of abuse. Operator873talkconnect 04:30, 15 May 2020 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »you shouldn't pressure other users on voting on RfD articles. The majority of the users who voted for checkusers were users from other wikis, or newbies...
Click to read more »the templates and test articles are in my user namespace, and the table below will provide easy links to check them out. (I will be offline for a couple...
Click to read more »increase password requirements for users that have accounts which can edit MediaWiki:Common.js, have access to checkuser or have access to Oversight. These...
Click to read more »Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 08:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC) Furthermore, he is a CheckUser. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC) Don't see much of...
Click to read more »2019 (UTC) Hi. I have a user from the English Vikidia site who says that they've been blocked on ENWP. A check on their user and talk pages reveals that...
Click to read more »User:castilibrary3 User:castilibrary4 User:castilibrary7 User:librarycasti4 User:librarycasti5 User:librarycasti6 User:librarycasti7 User:castilibrary8 User:castilibrary9...
Click to read more »Jon@talk:~$ 10:13, 14 July 2010 (UTC) This block is a checkuserblock and only a checkuser can deal with it. fr33kman 10:19, 14 July 2010 (UTC) The checkuserblock...
Click to read more »IP. MathXplore (talk) 08:24, 22 March 2023 (UTC) Administrator note: CheckUser Strikes applied. IP editors don't get !votes. Like will attract more UPE/Spam...
Click to read more »for already some time and decided to take this step now. I used to be a checkuser here from 2010 until my resignation in 2015. At the beginning of the year...
Click to read more »2011 (UTC) It allowed checkusers to check you for socks periodically which could be considered fishing if done on a "normal" user. -DJSasso (talk) 22:39...
Click to read more »It's a bot & cross-wiki. Hand it off to your CUs (& they should share on checkuser-l) – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 22:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC) Sorry, looks like...
Click to read more »administrators could check over the contributions from the range to make sure that the range block is appropriate to even bring up to a checkuser. That was what...
Click to read more »13:38, 19 July 2008 (UTC) "transwiki from en:User:Henrik/js/automod.js - copied to enable status template at User:Hersfold/StatusTemplate)" -- Creol(talk)...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) If you checkuser, all accounts are from a school. User:Thefishisnotdead is my ult, made to test view from another user. I never intended to...
Click to read more »User:castieditor1 User:castieditor2 User:castieditor3 User:editorcasti1 User:editorcasti2 User:editorcasti3 User:editorcasti4 User:editorcasti5 User:editorcasti6...
Click to read more »Yodas henchman (talk) 18:13, 9 November 2022 (UTC) This is mostly for the CheckUsers here, but I accidentally must have logged out after a while by default...
Click to read more »search for reliable sources. (See step D.) Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing. Read the article's talk page for...
Click to read more »should probably discuss is how to make sure to get some kind of readability check in there - Jimi Hendrix seems to have been promoted despite some readability...
Click to read more »you are doing! :) Lauryn (u • t • c) 07:51, 25 February 2010 (UTC) In checking your edits, your contribs seem to be exactly what simple Wikipedia needs...
Click to read more »go ahead and create this page. This help file would focus on helping new users create their own signatures here on the Simple English Wikipedia. I have...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC) I'd like to hear what the admins and Checkusers think, but my first thought is we don't want to validate them by giving...
Click to read more »redirect done by an unregistered User (IP) back in 2007.Ottawahitech (talk) 02:49, 4 July 2019 (UTC) Anyone want to check out Wikipedia:Proposed good articles#Lawrence...
Click to read more »find the article in the cleanup or complex article lists. Can somebody check I haven't missed it. I have also added an image Image:SPD logo.svg from...
Click to read more »really isn't grounds to run a CU... If a user is banned by the community it is a different story. If a Checkuser is suspicious of sockpuppetry and runs...
Click to read more »February 2022 (UTC) Hello everyone! Is there any tool or technique to check if my wiki user account is hijacked by someone or not? If anyone knows, please tell...
Click to read more »protect it and will post a thread at AN. Of course, before protecting, I'd check WP:P. Pmlineditor Talk 08:31, 12 September 2009 (UTC) Q: Do you have to...
Click to read more »standard idea that all users should normally follow. When changing this page (except for minor errors like typos), please check that other people agree...
Click to read more »global lock is justified at this time. While the email user function may be of no use, local CheckUsers can confirm if a different IP is being used to access...
Click to read more »the Olympics, the location of the IP is misdiscribed as my location, no Checkuser study is conducted, and that false assumption is used to argue against...
Click to read more »verified. Information posted on Wikipedia must not be meant to harm other users. Harmful information must be removed when found. Wikipedia:No legal threats...
Click to read more »wikipedia users have communicated (quacked) in a way which in my view is questionable. 89.8.85.114 (talk) 19:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC) Utilizing the CheckUser tool...
Click to read more »standard idea that all users should normally follow. When changing this page (except for minor errors like typos), please check that other people agree...
Click to read more ») that could be addressed in a joint way by knowledgeable admins and checkusers. Also, both in the UK and in the US (as well as many other countries)...
Click to read more »standard idea that all users should normally follow. When changing this page (except for minor errors like typos), please check that other people agree...
Click to read more »Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter Rollbacker Patroller Transwiki Importer Temporary account IP viewer Dough4872 (talk · contribs ·...
Click to read more »Disagree It is false! --Aaqib Talk!| Hola! 17:29, 14 June 2013 (UTC) Checking... I am reading the Deletion policies. --Aaqib Talk!| Hola! 17:29, 14 June...
Click to read more »finds the talk tab on the page if (talkpagelink.className == 'new') // And checks if it is a redlink { talkpagelink.firstChild.href += '§ion=new'; //...
Click to read more »no longer apply. Also, as more thousands of users have joined, it has become increasingly difficult to check the quality of new articles, and hence, many...
Click to read more »only the IPs (which also means not blocking named users operating from the IPs). I haven't run a checkuser, as so far I haven't seen any need. I do however...
Click to read more »User:castilibrary7 User:librarycasti4 User:librarycasti5 User:librarycasti6 User:librarycasti7 User:castilibrary8 User:castilibrary9 User:librarycasti8 User:librarycasti9...
Click to read more »There is no reason to delete. -DJSasso (talk) 17:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC) Checking... I am reading the Deletion policies. --Aaqib Talk!| Hola! 17:27, 14 June...
Click to read more »wikipedia isn't becoming an admin, a crat, or even a checkuser. I just want to continue being a random user all my life on this website, trying to make people...
Click to read more »-- see here. Shouldn't it matter to us that there is no on-point ENWP checkuser data? More to the point, Racepacket has no history of being an SEWP sockpuppet...
Click to read more »C.). Could you see if we could get this in the rotation? Could we also check that the article is no longer in the VGA main page rotation as well? TDKR...
Click to read more »by a number of the community to delete a bunch of stubs created by User:Nameless User citing A4, i.e. "does not show notability". Now then, far be it from...
Click to read more »already allows for two users to check the article for notability before deletion (as long as it is tagged as QD A4 by a non-admin user, and not just deleted)...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) User:w7bot has a bot flag already, and I'll run it if you want, but I think we will need to make Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage so I can...
Click to read more »blocked FastReverter as a sock of StaticFalcon as per check on his IRC nick. A checkuser may check this and unblock if appropriate though, he has confessed...
Click to read more »templates could be used to warn users for sending bad emails to other users. When an user sends a bad email to other user, the template (s) can be used...
Click to read more »also attempt to try and find another Checkuser if the person I believed I was likely to have to deal with the user in question in my work capacity. There...
Click to read more »shifted. Shapiros10 Flap the Yap 19:09, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Hi all. I as checkuser can confirm that neither of those two accounts on the English Wikipedia...
Click to read more »anyone but an elected Bureaucrat" - no, bureaucrats close RFAs and RFBs. Checkuser and oversight are a totally different set of tools. Additionally, if I...
Click to read more »auto-confirmed user, you will see a link "Move file to Wikimedia Commons" on the local file page. Step 2: When you click on this link, the FileImporter checks if...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) No, this is not a sock. Checkuser will prove. Also, those EN socks were Trolls too (again, look at Checkuser there.)-- Spiderpig0001 Does whatever...
Click to read more »it. ONUnicorn 20:30, 19 October 2006 (UTC) There has been a CheckUser request to check users Tangotango and Geeksluvpi. I wanted to announce, that neither...
Click to read more »word can be linked in the box and also the first time it's in the text. Check links after they are wikified, to make sure they lead to the correct page...
Click to read more »29 March 2012 (UTC) I think it's generally a poor idea. There is the checkuser wiki that can be utilized for those that need to use that, but I still...
Click to read more »on Simple to help get the 25 required votes in the recent request for checkuser(ship) but this all seems a bit harsh. Razorflame is, I assume, a young...
Click to read more »Note, the article is now located at User:Mighty Wodan/Wijerd Jelckama I made the mistake as well. I did not even check any other wikipedia(s) for this article...
Click to read more »import from the English Wikipedia, but we will need people to regularly check for updates on their end. --Hydriz (talk) 10:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC) ┌─────────────┘...
Click to read more »create a user name and start a page called "simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:YOUR USER NAME/sandbox". (Instead of "YOUR USER NAME", type the user name you...
Click to read more »other forms of English so long as usage is consistent for the whole page. Check the rest of the page before assuming that flavour, colour, metre, or defence...
Click to read more »like 'movie' and 'guitar.' Still, any tool that makes an editor double check their work regardless of whether it is spot-on accurate is a good thing...
Click to read more »page) Fix orphan articles (articles with no links to them) Check facts in articles Check sources in articles Find an interesting fact in an article and...
Click to read more »customs, folk arts, folk religion, mythology etc. on your local Wikipedia. Check if your local Wikipedia is participating A special competition called Wiki...
Click to read more »should be left alone. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:33, 18 June 2013 (UTC) User like checkusers etc have to be administrators per our policy. So because of the redirects...
Click to read more »(possibly using a temporary page listing templates that need checking or double checking)? This is a collaborative encyclopaedia after all. Information...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment: Checkuser requested. MathXplore (talk) 06:32, 29 July 2023 (UTC) checkuser done, commented on the cu page. Affected users blocked. What...
Click to read more »was check of humanity. This is an idea. --Psl631 Talk Contributions 10:05, 24 March 2018 (UTC) Hello. I only ask where protection of my userpage, User:Psl631...
Click to read more »unregistered users from creating user pages? I'm not talking about user talk pages, just user pages. Unregistered users aren't allowed to have their own user pages...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage) fr33kman t - c 03:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC) If no one has any objections, I can get it done by tomorrow. Just a final check: Change...
Click to read more »advertising of the person, and nothing to do with building a wiki. Check it out on a dozen user pages of our most frequent editors. You'll find they say almost...
Click to read more »maintenance. WP:IAR is for editors, and thus it is extended to every user, be they admin, checkuser, bureaucrat, steward or IP. Admins no more have to follow all...
Click to read more »Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available...
Click to read more »author or authors of the article are banned users. I realize that a checkuser may not publicly connect an IP user with a named account. My own research shows...
Click to read more »violation. Where a user's present name violates the username policy, renames should usually be performed. Privacy reasons. If a user wishes to stop using...
Click to read more »articles, items 1, 4, and 7 cannot be checked automatically. The rest of the checks can be done automatically. This would allow to write a bot, that browses...
Click to read more »LWCU = Loginwiki CheckUser MathXplore (talk) 06:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC) thanks Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 08:24, 9 July 2024 (UTC) Nominating user 192.83.149.205...
Click to read more »hope to continue gaining knowledge, trust, and skill necessary to pursue CheckUser and Oversight. From a technical standpoint, I believe I have the skill...
Click to read more »Two factors I can think of: lag time with the server and deleted edits. Check your edit count in the "my settings" link. How does that compare to the...
Click to read more »linked to non-articles (Most of these were removed but some may remain). Check what links to a page listed here before creating it to be certain it is...
Click to read more »is not suitable for being posted here (As an example: Data related to CheckUser). Given there are enough places that give out free email accounts, I do...
Click to read more »post this kind of reminder for requests that are not yours. The admins, checkusers, and bureaucrats here are all volunteers and can't always get to things...
Click to read more »successful nominations for advanced permissions (administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser and oversighter). I see vandals and/or disruptive editors, disrupting...
Click to read more »bureaucrats, checkusers and oversighters need to be admin, so there are 18 admins (some with more privs), compared to about 10 named users.--Eptalon (talk)...
Click to read more »permission to our two most active checkusers, who have already identified themselves to the foundation. User:Creol User:Eptalon The policy requires 70-80%...
Click to read more »there is no vandalism on articles, keeping IP vandals’ behaviour in check and checking the recent changes area to make sure nobody has done anything bad...
Click to read more »believe that I will make a good administrator now and if you want, you can check out what I have done with the tools on the Simple English Wiktionary. I...
Click to read more »yall running dont yall check facts What article did you see this information on? Vermont (talk) 03:57, 27 March 2020 (UTC) This user is CU blocked on enwp...
Click to read more »24 February 2010 (UTC) I thought you only needed the 25 supports for Checkuser.-- † CR90 22:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC) For oversight as well. –Juliancolton | Talk...
Click to read more »User:castilibrary3 User:castilibrary4 User:castilibrary7 User:librarycasti4 User:librarycasti5 User:librarycasti6 User:librarycasti7 User:castilibrary8 User:castilibrary9...
Click to read more »makes it necessary to re-elect new users into positions of CheckUser and Bureaucrat. It is clear that with new users in these positions, this Wikipedia...
Click to read more »for that. You'll have to create Template:User en-gb-n or Template:User en-uk-n. You could user Template:User en-ca-n as a base for those. -Avicennasis...
Click to read more »don't think it's everyone's instinct to check for that for such short stubs). I also noticed a revert of User:Æåm Fætsøn at (the now-deleted) Amy Lowell...
Click to read more »Comment: Checkuser-comment to whoever closes this: This page has been semi-protected for extended sockpuppetry; therefore: The comments of the users with...
Click to read more »so far. Someone good with templates should try to fix the template to check for the namespace (main articles, or article talk page), so that Wikipedia:Simple...
Click to read more »bureaucrats becoming inactive. We can't possibly give them higher rights (checkuser, oversight, steward?!). This "reward-like" system shouldn't be implemented...
Click to read more »What do others think? Should I do a global request for checkuser? Can we temporarily block the user? Thanks in advance for giving me thoughts, PDLTalk to...
Click to read more »administrator on the English wikipedia for nearly a year, and is a trusted, friendly user in both places. I think having Malinaccier as an admin would be a great help...
Click to read more »-Niko {Nikro} My user name is Nikro, but i misspelled it Niko when creating an account. please change my name for me. for prove, check out my Wikipedia...
Click to read more »accusations. Could you tell us a bit more about your WikiProject? After checking the most visited articles on SEWP, I saw that the majority were sexuality-related...
Click to read more »(talk) 07:44, 31 May 2013 (UTC) Given the users choice of information, edit style and article selection, a checkuser request is almost certainly going to end...
Click to read more »pages, or to see who is editing from where (in the case of checkuser), or to rename users, promote bots, and make new admins (in the case of Bureaucrats)...
Click to read more »solved with using a by continent approach. (Note: I have left a message at User talk:24.190.40.112 the creator of the new articles to join the discussion)...
Click to read more »for PC and mobile devices. On a Discord server, users can talk with text and voice in real time. Users are also able to share media like pictures. In 2016...
Click to read more »♥ Nifky! I am going to take a wild guess that Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser is the same as the Sockpuppet investigations at the English Wikipedia...
Click to read more »every time an emergency comes up. It couldn't hurt to carry over the checkuser status as well for the same basic reason, but that is a different story...
Click to read more »checkusers and other actions. A problem arose whereby we had to check Wiooiw's IP address and that check and subsequent checks proved that the user lives...
Click to read more »read User:Either way/draft as a statement of my candidacy so to speak. Thanks, Either way (talk) 04:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC) Q Are you the same user as en:User:Either...
Click to read more »applies to user pages (as long as it isn't offensive, put what you want there), User talk (we get a good number of people asking questions of users in their...
Click to read more »(UTC) Resolved. Admins and checkusers have attended to said attack. Pmlineditor ∞ 13:34, 4 February 2010 (UTC) Check your new user log; the widdle kiddles...
Click to read more »whole pile of others from English Wikipedia. Someone might need to do a checkuser and see how many others there are.Kumioko (talk) 21:36, 23 November 2012...
Click to read more »marcmiquel *at* gmail.com I need a contact in your every community who can (1) check the quality of the cultural context article list I generate to be imported-exported...
Click to read more »protected are those in "support" roles, like administrators, OTRS agents, checkusers, etc. We want to be sure you know about this and have a chance to join...
Click to read more »linking is acceptable. --Ferien2 (talk) 18:00, 22 May 2021 (UTC) Can someone check out Thornhill Secondary School? The article is messy, but I'm not sure if...
Click to read more »tag Little Red Riding Hood: Seen as a little short; did anyone actually check? (all inclusive 5.7k) Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District: Claims to...
Click to read more »Currently Vector is running for checkuser access on WP:RFA. So far about a week has passed since he nominated himself for checkuser but only received 3 supports...
Click to read more »IRC and able to respond when something happens. Fr33kman is an active Checkuser (and therefore already identified to the WMF) and my experiences with...
Click to read more »propose the following editing restrictions: User:Ydennek is restricted to one account, subject to checkuser. User:Ydennek is placed on editing probation for...
Click to read more »my clients and create pages for those who don't yet have them. You can check out my page here: (Redacted) You can see who I am here: (Redacted) Candidate's...
Click to read more »Please unblock that account. And btw, there is a page for requesting checkusers to be done... -Barras (talk) 21:49, 11 April 2011 (UTC) As Barras said...
Click to read more »secondary ability, to suppress redirects, is very helpful as I tend to work in user space and have to deal with change page names, or with complicated naming...
Click to read more »Interface administrators are users who are able to: Edit any user's custom CSS, JavaScript, and JSON pages Edit the site-wide CSS, JavaScript, and JSON...
Click to read more »or highly likely to be vandalized, or being edit warred over. Then you check WP:P. Then you decide whether to protect. A2: You only protect a page you...
Click to read more »--Scientificboy1 (talk) 13:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC) Administrator note: CheckUser strike applied. Operator873 connect 19:07, 20 April 2022 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »Thank you. American Eagle (talk) 04:42, 10 May 2009 (UTC) Co-nomination by User:RyanCross: Mentifisto (talk · contribs) has been an active contributer to...
Click to read more »If I am working on a draft in my user space, when it's finished, do I just move it to article space, or do I need to go through some sort of process? -...
Click to read more »Confirmed to Bruhking56om by a checkuser in this sockpuppet investigation on the English Wikipedia? The user's user page is a promotional piece about...
Click to read more »know, there is no check for multiple accounts using the same email for the account creator flag (it bypasses the black list, if a check existed, it should...
Click to read more »of pages must check what has been done, item by item. Unregistered users can never be trusted, and even auto-confirmed registered users need close watching...
Click to read more »Once as Kennedy, once as NotGiven. He was asked about it quietly by a checkuser, and he decided to run an RFDA/RFDB of his own accord and failed it. fr33kman...
Click to read more »in articles, and also allows for easy design, use, and customization of user scripts related to automated article cleanup. It is based on CodeFixer, Plastikspork's...
Click to read more »report this sockpuppet without requesting a checkuser (as I would do on Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser). Is there a way to do this on simple wiki? Mikehawk10...
Click to read more »instructions on this page Wikipedia:User page. There is also a link at the bottom of every edit page. This is a User page where users can write their article and...
Click to read more »useful, more drastic means are likely to be needed to reduce the problem (Checkuser). -- Creol(talk) 09:49, 18 February 2007 (UTC) I think it'll be great...
Click to read more »authentication) on all wikis. This permission is only assigned to users that have CheckUser or Oversight rights on at least one wiki or are global sysops...
Click to read more »bounce back to the UK while the user here shows IPs from a Norway ISP. Bouncing alot there.. Would take a checkuser to confirm and that would just be...
Click to read more »21:25, 17 June 2022 (UTC) Is there an editing tool that can be used to check a text for words that are not on the Wikipedia:Basic English combined wordlist...
Click to read more »I've been following his edits for some time now, and did some statistic checking a couple of days ago. Currently he has around 2,539 edits with 86% to article...
Click to read more »don't usually write biographies of living people, so could someone double-check my expansion of Anish Kapoor? I added a section on the Vantablack controversy...
Click to read more »the duties and responsibilities of checkuser. Furthermore we need more checkusers who don't have all available user rights. Gives more "power" spread over...
Click to read more »have it at en.wikipedia, and want it here, ask an admin to add you to the check page. Thanks, BG7even 17:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the info...
Click to read more »indeffed for having a bad user name (the user name is the name of a company). List of pages included in this request: User:Aerykbacon/Aeryk & Aaron Bacon...
Click to read more »years now, so I'm familiar with the tools (check). I also recently recieved rollback right on ukwiki (check) for the same reason. If you think that my...
Click to read more »asking this because I was thinking about renaming myself and was checking out a user. It is 6 years old, and hasn't made any edits. I don't think renaming...
Click to read more »support. The user is uncivil, will only take yes for an answer (meaning you better agree with him or else...). I do not trust this user, and can't see...
Click to read more »elsewhere (especially at YourWiki, where I also have things like Oversight, CheckUser etc) proves that I will not misuse the tools. Thanks, BG7even 19:20, 18...
Click to read more »June 2008 (UTC) I already brought this up over on the WP:AN. A checkuser on this user didn't reveal any clear information. Can't say if its him on not...
Click to read more »knowledge templates are not capable of opening a new tab so you might want to check the javascript. Also I pinged Djsasso cause he is good with wiki javascript...
Click to read more »associates IPs and usernames, this section neeeds to be limited to the checkusers we have.--Eptalon (talk) 12:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC) I mean yeah, we should...
Click to read more »on Monday, March 23, 2015. Teachers will look over the work and be done checking it by April 4, 2015. (Taking the full two weeks.) The IP range on our primary...
Click to read more »standard idea that all users should normally follow. When changing this page (except for minor errors like typos), please check that other people agree...
Click to read more »a CheckUser. Calm the discussion by encouraging editors not to speculate and to wait for proper review. Request for checkuser to verify the users claim...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment- the user box doesn't worry me, and having someone with strong views on this subject "self identify" makes it easier to check on any future POV...
Click to read more »talk 18:12, 26 July 2008 (UTC) With that logic, only M7 would be left as CheckUser. Do you really think that'd be a good idea? - Who answered the last few...
Click to read more »Hangzhou, Wikipedia:Simple talk and even my talkpage. Can anyone help me check the AF log ? I do not think I am doing something wrong. Thank you.--94rain...
Click to read more »I saw this page on Special:NewPages, where I check recently created unpatrolled pages. I usually check articles to see wether a they are a hoax or not...
Click to read more »if the code for that exists in the core, or in a special message. I'll check.... Jon@talk:~$ 19:42, 18 December 2011 (UTC) Another consideration, if...
Click to read more »it shouldnt be a standard uw-block template as only checkusers can verify abuse using the checkuser extension... --Ferien2 (talk) 16:18, 4 September 2022...
Click to read more »wiki-technology & servers, about wiki-software updates, about Wikipedia size and users, about Contacting admins, or about MediaWiki markup language. Many wiki-related...
Click to read more »can thereafter make a new request for adminship to get their administrator user right back if they become active again. Administrators listed below may have...
Click to read more »like the 3 users above this comment just made their account for their votes at here. MathXplore (talk) 09:39, 24 July 2021 (UTC) Checkuser observation:...
Click to read more »personal attacks, I have warned him on two seperate occasions and so has User:FastReverter here. I advised him that it is his last warning, any further...
Click to read more »EchoBravo contribs 15:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC) In short, except for my additions on CheckUsers (last monh), this guideline was not really touched since the end of last...
Click to read more »I'll let the 'crat decide on this one, but the user only has 3 edits that aren't user/wikipedia/user talk space. Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 17:10...
Click to read more »fails notablity --Farsadx (talk) 06:48, 8 December 2024 (UTC) This user was checkuser-blocked. Depextual (talk) 05:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »2012 (UTC) Since Jessica Alba was on the Main Page today, I did a quick check. Two refs were 404. 14 Mottram, James. "Jessica Alba: She wooed Hollywood...
Click to read more »time ago. I am writing the Aramaic page for this Wikipedia now (please check the simplicity of my English). I think it will be useful for people who...
Click to read more »once. --Trade (talk) 17:19, 24 July 2020 (UTC) Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#Chasehanens Confirmed Operator873talkconnect 17:39, 24 July 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »liked (Liverpool F.C.) it stopped him from doing it, and gave him a reality check. I'm not asking for an unban, just explaining. He is "emotionally different"...
Click to read more »created by user:Abu Sayeed Hossan who is a sock of en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Md Sunnat Ali Mollik, confirmed on bnwiki by checkuser[1]. আফতাবুজ্জামান...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Note I just noticed the user was blocked by checkuser a day after creating this, so I've requested G5. CountryANDWestern...
Click to read more »python here. -Avicennasis @ 04:25, 19 March 2010 (UTC) thx Avicennasis. I'll check it out. I-on|I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ 13:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC) No problem. I...
Click to read more »that we should give rights to users if they already have them at enWP? Rights such as Bureaucrat, Oversight, and Checkuser. Griffinofwales2 (talk) 03:10...
Click to read more »article thanks Heaventoherl (talk) 16:15, 27 May 2023 (UTC) user blocked as a checkuser block by User:Eptalon Bobherry Talk My Changes 16:39, 27 May 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »changed at any time; go to "Personal settings" in the upper right corner and check or uncheck "Show preview before edit box and not after it." --Bkell 00:02...
Click to read more »contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - For vandalism. See contribs for more info. MathCool10 04:41...
Click to read more »