Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following one or more categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
are two main ways that pages can be deleted: Shortcuts WP:QDWP:QD WP:CSDWP:CSD WP:SPEEDYWP:SPEEDY Before deleting a page that meets one of the quick deletion...
Click to read more »was to Delete. MathXplore (talk) 00:19, 10 October 2024 (UTC) Template:CSD summary (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Speedy-deleted per CSD criterion G4 Non-admin close. StevenJ81 (talk) 17:44, 1 October 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:CSD#A6 covers hoaxes. EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC) National...
Click to read more »1800s. The article established no notability whatsoever, so I requested a CSD on notability grounds. Turned into a bit of an argument between me and the...
Click to read more »was to Delete. - Speedy deleted A4 by Auntof6 - IPs kept reverting my A4 CSD which is why I came here, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »creator removing the A4-CSD tag - Glad they did now to be honest, Anyway having read en:WP:A7 at EN apparently they don't CSD places either so thanks...
Click to read more »talk page and/or redirects when using the CSD tool; edit the deletion reason before deleting with the CSD tool. And lots more minor annoyances and nits...
Click to read more »request Cohaf has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: RFD after CSD was denied. Notifying Praxidicae who tagged as A4. Non notable actress and...
Click to read more »themselves. Also including social media links to facebook page. Not covered by CSD so sending this here instead. DaneGeld (talk) 12:13, 26 June 2018 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »equivalent. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 02:53, 21 September 2017 (UTC) Delete - IMHO CSD-worthy, Article is very very short to the point where there's no actual valuable...
Click to read more »here. I now have ~350 edits, lots of vandalism reverted, reports to VIP, CSD tagging and other helpful tasks. I have RB and PCR on English Wikipedia too...
Click to read more »Can we QD it? Chenzw Talk 06:26, 1 August 2008 (UTC) Hoaxes are not QD/CSD material unfortunately. Cassandra 06:38, 1 August 2008 (UTC) Hmm... yeah...
Click to read more »log: Hard R: CSD R3 ({{db-redirtypo}}) 10:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC) Hard R: CSD R3 ({{db-redirtypo}}) 10:56, 1 February 2022 (UTC) G'day: CSD R3 ({{db-redirtypo}})...
Click to read more »section is a clear sign that OpenAI was used to create this article, could CSD as AI generated. Ravensfire (talk) 15:53, 20 May 2026 (UTC) Delete Lacks...
Click to read more »grounds, so I reverted and am sending it to RfD. Pinging Auntof6 as original CSD decliner. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 14:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »(UTC) Quick delete per criteria articles#4, general#4 and general#11 of WP:CSD. The article (and related articles) have been previously deleted across multiple...
Click to read more »because the page there is very new. I have actually tagged it there for CSD since it makes no claim of notability either. fr33kman 20:47, 31 May 2025...
Click to read more »be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete imho CSD worthy - makes no sense to me, Anyway I don't know what "current members"...
Click to read more »be speedy deleted if possible, but I'm not as familiar with simplewiki's CSD protocols so I leave that up to the discretion of those more experienced...
Click to read more »be able to keep.--Cohaf (talk) 03:02, 13 January 2019 (UTC) Keep: unlike CSD on English Wikipedia, QD doesn't appear to contain a G5-equivalent, so the...
Click to read more »accounts, I have never been blocked from editing. Furthermore, I did a lot of CSD work and contributed many Third Opinions, which gave me quite a bit of experience...
Click to read more »tagged that page!, As for CSDing I have no objections if anyone wants to CSD this, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:36, 6 June 2018 (UTC) Keep Page Please, it...
Click to read more »the English Wikipedia, this would likely be deleted quickly under w:en:WP:CSD#U5. Since the rules here about using Wikipedia as a webhost appear similar...
Click to read more »12 May 2008 (UTC) I propose that the following line is removed from the CSD non-criteria or reworded to the effect "non-notable things can be removed...
Click to read more »March 2008 (UTC) I think we should format the QD templates like the nice CSD (QD) templates at EN. What do you think? SwirlBoy39 13:42, 22 March 2008...
Click to read more »its creation. Needless to say, the idea of a four day period comes from WP:CSD#C1. Please comment. - Huji reply 07:38, 7 September 2007 (UTC) Generally...
Click to read more »EN is doing a better job than us at processing CSD candidates (if we were to calculate based on a CSD candidate/total articles ratio), but that would...
Click to read more »According to all the above, I propose this to be added as a criterion to WP:CSD: Articles created by directly copying (or copy-pasting) all or almost all...
Click to read more »I saw an article like that on enwiki I would happily speedy it per en:WP:CSD#A3 --Chris 11:58, 25 April 2009 (UTC) Eptalon, any way of identifying these...
Click to read more »solution looking for a problem - If you don't want the redirect existing just CSD it. –Davey2010Talk 22:00, 18 July 2020 (UTC) I think this page should be...
Click to read more »@Thegooduser Untick the "notify the page creator" option on the top of the TW CSD menu when notifying deletions. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:02, 20 November...
Click to read more »SoyokoAnis - talk 13:15, 17 March 2022 (UTC) Things here are simpler, from CSD criteria to template names. Since the 20+ modules of (original) Twinkle works...
Click to read more »more general category in which case the category would end up empty and CSD worthy in a few days. The 3 item rule was more what we tell people before...
Click to read more »have a trigger finger when it comes to the admin-related tasks (ie VIP, CSD) etc. I can't give you the tools in confidence. SteveTalk 21:37, 9 April...
Click to read more »on (still have no idea why) - I will happily tell you my record with AFD/CSD on those projects is exceptionally poor because of the aforementioned reasons...
Click to read more »a very fair point you would remove it, You've never been shy in removing CSD tags, Just felt it was a decline at that time but anyway I've struck that...
Click to read more »May 2008 (UTC) Done -- Creol(talk) 02:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC) an "add a QD/CSD tab to the top of the screen that allows you to quickly add QD tags and one...
Click to read more »you check my deleted contributions, I've probably done at least a dozen CSD tags in the last few days, so what makes you think I'll delete two articles...
Click to read more »was the Wijerd Jelckama thing (for non-admins, I basically tagged it as CSD A3 and reverted when the user who created the article reverted me); although...
Click to read more »(UTC) I noticed that after I sent it to AFD however as one admin removed the CSD from the mainspace article as "not a hoax" I figured CSD'ing this as "BLPVIO"...
Click to read more »user page. Chenzw Talk 12:46, 17 June 2016 (UTC) That article has had the CSD tag for a long time now and I believe it should get deleted. Thanks! --LaurenCox600...
Click to read more »attempted to start a deletion discussion over there; I did not simply request CSD. This was an attempt to gain some views from their speakers (which would...
Click to read more »messages if they are not needed, or if it will not work correctly (for example, CSD G5 - banned user). You can turn on messages for these criteria in your Twinkle...
Click to read more »in this special case, En WP and Simple En WP have a similar rule. On WP:CSD#U2, you can read that user pages for non-existant users meet criteria for...
Click to read more »I am an active vandal fighter and new page patroller on en-wiki (see my CSD log). --Bmusician 16:13, 6 March 2012 (UTC) I've not been very active of...
Click to read more »wiki (Spanish, Tagalog, Welsh, and here) with it being fought over as a CSD on English (and most likely headed to AfD if it fails the QD), I find it...
Click to read more »user has made Zard Patton Ka Bunn, and w:Zard Patton Ka Bunn is deleted as CSD G5 per w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nauman335, the same SPI as well...
Click to read more »other wikis under many accounts (this shows how this particular user removed CSD templates from other identical articles created by other DUCK socks). Some...
Click to read more »there is no claim to notability in the article. This is similar to EN's CSD A7. QD A4 does not mean that the subject of the article was found to be not...
Click to read more »locked per xwiki spam involvement. Please note that the 3rd user caused a CSD U5 case in enwiki and made related uploads to Commons (Special:CentralAuth/Joelpaul777)...
Click to read more »notability guideline. The English Wikipedia further elaborates the idea behind CSD A7 (QD A4 over here): "This (the indication of importance) is distinct from...
Click to read more »Hockeycatcat (talk) (changes) 13:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC) A) If I were going to CSD them all I wouldn't be here now and B) How is this not disruptive ?, Either...
Click to read more »I am an active vandal fighter and new page patroller on en-wiki (see my CSD log). --Bmusician 16:13, 6 March 2012 (UTC) I've not been very active of...
Click to read more »August 2023 (UTC) i will just read en's CSD. 88.110.38.249 (talk) 11:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC) We have a page about CSD but it is called QD. – Angerxiety! 16:43...
Click to read more »July 2022 (16 years, 186 days) Oldest mainspace page validly deleted under CSD G7 (request by sole substantive author): FeudalsM, 19 years and 7 months...
Click to read more »mind renewing it which I've done. I dunno why I thought we CSD'd previously CSD topics. I would recommend putting the item to AfD at this stage though Lee...
Click to read more »says " 23:52, 25 July 2007 Wimt talk contribs deleted page Liam Atkins (CSD A7 (Bio): Biographical article that does not assert significance) 23:50,...
Click to read more »"wikitext" & new_size < 50 & old_size > 300 & !(added_lines irlike "#REDIRECT|csd|delete|db|qd|speedy") & global_user_editcount < 100 Thank you. Codename Noreste...
Click to read more »examples), Should these be deleted per A4?, I didn't want to clog RFD or CSD up so thought I'd just ask here in case others too believe these should be...
Click to read more »Ravensfire (talk) 13:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC) These articles are just so bad. CSD#A11 is probably the best option. The handful I've looked involved delete...
Click to read more »believe there are other ways then writing articles. One being appropriate CSD tagging and RFD voting. These show that you know what does and doesn’t belong...
Click to read more »about whether there was a claim to notability in the article (i.e. EN's CSD A7 "credible claim of significance"). Whether the subject of the article...
Click to read more »