Redirect to:
Consensus is a way of talking and working together to make decisions. On Wikipedia, it is the main way we make decisions. Consensus can also mean a decision...
Click to read more »interests on your userpage, and are based on the babel boxes. Current consensus is that userboxes (excluding the standard Babel templates and the actual...
Click to read more »process" is the way to decide what is put on the project. See Wikipedia:CONSENSUS. All writing is available by copyleft licensing. Wikipedia uses the Creative...
Click to read more »everyone will have a chance to think about the article and come to a consensus or compromise. If the reverting carries on, an administrator may block...
Click to read more »some criteria that must be met. These criteria have been developed by a consensus of Simple English Wikipedia users. They are listed below. Named editors...
Click to read more »editor as though it were a consensus policy. Stonewalling or filibustering – repeatedly pushing a viewpoint with which the consensus of the community clearly...
Click to read more »after upload. Simple English Wikipedia logos may also be uploaded upon consensus being reached for a new project logo. To learn how to put images on pages...
Click to read more »own opinion, and not as it was supposed to be understood Making false consensus Stopping discussion from getting anywhere, on purpose Commonly breaking...
Click to read more »administrator will decide if there is a consensus (agreement) about what to do, and take appropriate steps. If the consensus was that the discussion was closed...
Click to read more »auto-TASERed by the new "auto-taser every user that hasn't responded" feature Consensus is the oil that this Wikipedia machine lives on, and more comments makes...
Click to read more »at the end of each sentence within the paragraph. Does not engage in consensus building: repeatedly disregards other users' questions or requests for...
Click to read more »with essentially the same consensus to use movie instead of film or with a lack of consensus to change to a new consensus (ie the recent discussions)...
Click to read more »it usually reflects things that most people agree on. This is called consensus. The things that people disagree and argue about must also be mentioned...
Click to read more »administrator will decide if there is a consensus (agreement) about what to do, and take appropriate steps. If the consensus was that the discussion was closed...
Click to read more »that others cannot change their pages. This goes against our belief in consensus and is not how we at the Simple English Wikipedia work. While we have...
Click to read more »the article will be either promoted or not promoted depending on the consensus reached in the discussion. This is not a vote, so please do not use comments...
Click to read more »did not succeed. Please do not modify it. Not successful: There is no consensus to promote the user. -Barras talk 10:44, 14 July 2010 (UTC) Bluegoblin7...
Click to read more »warriors Even if the infobox contains an editors' note advising of current consensus amongst editors (sometimes following much metaphorical bloodshed) and...
Click to read more »further changes should be made to this discussion. closed: as not promoted. Consensus is not in the candidates favour fr33kman 02:38, 5 March 2010 (UTC) Slipknot1 (talk ·...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this discussion. Successful per clear consensus, my vote notwithstanding. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:40, 4 March 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »for oversightship. Please do not modify it. Closed as promoted: Clear consensus to promote. 29/0 -Barras talk 10:19, 10 July 2010 (UTC) Sonia (talk ·...
Click to read more »bureaucrat and will definitely be able to tell when there is community consensus or not on any issue that is brought up. I also believe that he will be...
Click to read more »consensus (BELOW) without comment. Just opinion without justification. Think you can do that? --Gwib -(talk)- 20:57, 20 October 2008 (UTC) Consensus is...
Click to read more »than an administrator, but they should only use these while acting on consensus. Bureaucrats can give administrator or bureaucrat rights to other users...
Click to read more »are coming together in the process of consensus-building: What makes consensus? consensus-building? Consensus = (a) a process of decision-making that...
Click to read more »for oversightship. Please do not modify it. Closed as promoted: Clear consensus to promote. 15/3 fr33kman talk 02:17, 8 November 2009 (UTC) Juliancolton...
Click to read more »Retrieved 5 November 2011. Davis, Martin (2006). "The Church–Turing Thesis: Consensus and opposition", Proceedings, Computability in Europe 2006. Lecture notes...
Click to read more »he believes his own standards to be superior. Therefore, he violates consensus. This is not the first time that people have complained about his misuse...
Click to read more »(usually one year). At some point, an agreement will be reached, called consensus. If this is necessary, an administrator can then take technical measures...
Click to read more »interesting the AfD at Wikipedia about the article there. It was closed as "no consensus" and was kept, just a note. -- RyanCross (talk) 05:58, 13 July 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »does not have an arbitration committee, so most desysopping is done by consensus of the community. As of December 2007, there have been at least 3 cases...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this discussion. Result: There was no consensus, not even roughly, to do anything here. The default result is Keep. NonvocalScream...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete — Offwiki consensus is not on wiki consensus. It cannot be used to claim that the template was made with consensus. There is no need to welcome...
Click to read more »the article will be either promoted or not promoted depending on the consensus reached in the discussion. Hannah Spencer (change · talk · history · links...
Click to read more »about keeping them that it ends in no consensus. That is not some, that is a majority if its ending in no consensus (or very close to a majority). Griffinofwales...
Click to read more »to this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to no consensus. From a policy perspective, I agree with the nominator, and find the keep...
Click to read more »and per previous consensus. MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 14:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC) @MrMeAndMrMe: I did not know about the previous consensus. Would you please...
Click to read more »meet certain requirements [which include]...gain a local consensus. I'm not sure if the consensus is for the task or for the person, but the fact that only...
Click to read more »process in some way. WP:RfD — Needs more participants. We can decide consensus more clearly with more participants. Also, try to leave a rationale for...
Click to read more »usernames from other logs. It must not be used to hide mistakes without consensus — the community needs to be able to review actions, whether proper or...
Click to read more »severe violation of more than 9 Wikipedia policies or guidelines. WP:CONSENSUS - The author(s), of an article section, must be contacted about discussion...
Click to read more »My actions are for the good of the project and keep it fair and with consensus. Thanks, BG7even 13:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC) This discussion in particular...
Click to read more »Simple Talk by Flying Spaghetti Monster, and there was general community consensus for such a section. However, at the time, it was taken no further... In...
Click to read more »worries with importing from files, there seems to be the trust in you and consensus at all to grant you that flag. Please take care with the tool and don't...
Click to read more »Delete. Delete nomination + keep !vote, the consensus on this RfD is based on what NCRYPTO says: the consensus is that crypto-centric news organizations—such...
Click to read more »irrelevant—is secondary. This notability guideline for biographies is based on consensus reached through discussions and reinforced by established practice. It...
Click to read more »Page selected articles list fully. So I propose: Either we should reach consensus on what to do (other than what I suggest below) before Feb 23 Or we should...
Click to read more »it's an undeeded measure here at Simple at the moment, but if there is consensus for it I will file a bug. BG7even 08:57, 11 December 2008 (UTC) We'll...
Click to read more »thing - Wikipedia:Consensus is a policy and states clearly that voting does not show consensus and we can only act on this with consensus. "Some people may...
Click to read more »here are based on consensus that is forming on Wikipedia talk:Proposed very good articles. They can and should be tweaked as new consensus is formed and/or...
Click to read more »the world change Wikipedia, and they all need to agree with each other. Consensus means the way a group of people think about something. When a decision...
Click to read more »should not burden the "admin team" to determine consensus (as I pointed out before, 3-4 votes, 100% consensus, makes a (Very) Good Article?) - If we do not...
Click to read more »get a consensus for this, but this page was created for the point of vandalism. This redirect isn't German and I'm fairly certain that the consensus is that...
Click to read more »sometimes used to see how the consensus balances. However, voting is not consensus, it just helps to build it and to see where consensus is in the discussion....
Click to read more »decide whether a vote was successful. He or she should look for consensus. Consensus means what most people feel should be done. In certain requests,...
Click to read more »there, so it is clearly not a consensus. Barras || talk 15:11, 15 August 2009 (UTC) To Chenzw: I know the last consensus was to have no more than 3 oversighters...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Consensus is to keep with title changes Peterdownunder (talk) 06:54, 12 October...
Click to read more »Ferien supported redirects relying on previously decided consensus and WP:FOLLOW saying that Consensus is usually for foreign redirects to be kept, they are...
Click to read more »The article was deleted via community consensus at Afd on English Wikipedia in December 2022. The consensus is that the subject is not sufficiently...
Click to read more »Synergy. I looked at your pages on Silence and Consensus. I think that we do need a policy page on Consensus and that Silence could be a less official policy...
Click to read more »elected by the community via a request for oversightship. Per Foundation policy, a user must have at least 25 supports and a 70% consensus to be elected....
Click to read more »Administrator note: 1 vote is not enough to develop consensus. Extended a week to give time to develop consensus. -- Enfcer (talk) 15:36, 18 May 2017 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus leans towards deletion based on the provided essays and guidelines shared...
Click to read more »attractiveness but an objection was raised. I brought it here to gain consensus as to whether to redirect or delete. User:Rus793 (talk) 02:04, 14 May...
Click to read more »arguments, it is no wonder that no consensus either for or against has ever emerged. I doubt we'll reach a consensus for or against anytime soon :) fr33kman...
Click to read more »Nominator seems to have accepted no reason to delete "OK its good with a consensus" fr33kman 11:44, 8 September 2010 (UTC) William Langland (edit · talk...
Click to read more »of the two other options. If that's no consensus, then there won't be a consensus at all. But without consensus, one shouldn't put the 3rd option in forward...
Click to read more »en:Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion. I think we should reach consensus here in a different way. - Huji reply 07:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC) Really...
Click to read more »merging. Delete If I'm not mistaken, there was a previous RfD and the consensus was to delete. Shouldn't this be deleted based on the fact that it was...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:27, 23 April 2017 (UTC) Category:Politicians...
Click to read more »any, consensus had been reached with this feature and simplewiki. I have read the arguments for and against and have determined that no consensus exists...
Click to read more »deletion was to Keep. Even weeks after the closing date, I don't see a consensus, we have a split, about half of those commenting are in favor, the others...
Click to read more »Belle (talk) 05:14, 22 February 2010 (UTC) Extended for three days. Consensus exists presently, but we need 25 supports. Participate, folks! –Juliancolton | Talk...
Click to read more »06:41, 19 July 2009 (UTC) Correct. The steward will require a community consensus to remove. We have to make one here... then once the community blesses...
Click to read more »(UTC) Aye. SteveTalk 11:17, 31 January 2009 (UTC) Support - Per community consensus and WP:AGF. Good luck with the tools and godspeed. --§ Snake311 (I'm Not...
Click to read more »Examples of acceptable use would be deleting a large number of pages after consensus has been achieved at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion. Unacceptable uses...
Click to read more »replace community consensus, of course, and like any admin action is appealable to community consensus. In the event there is consensus here to implement...
Click to read more »people think, it is not setting stone. Consensus should be drawn from this whole discussion. If there is strong consensus for something different than my proposal...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete -- no discussion at all. No objecting to relisting. --Auntof6...
Click to read more »userboxes, despite the above consensus. I will make a note for him to hold off making any more until there is consensus to have them. Blockinblox 19:19...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2009/Category:Pokémon monsters. The consensus was to keep Pikachu, Charizard, Jigglypuff, Lucario and the Mew brothers...
Click to read more »···Katerenka (討論) 07:27, 29 December 2009 (UTC) There is obviously a consensus and I've got the flood tag to start at once this removal work on over...
Click to read more »there is consensus to do so. I'm just following what the community thought a while ago. Until the projects reach projectspace through consensus, there can't...
Click to read more »Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I think the consensus is that except for a few very special cases, we shouldn't have gender-specific...
Click to read more »where two or more accounts (one editor) are attempting to develop a consensus in an article using sock accounts. Q: You withdrew your last RfCU. What...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Disputed QD. Previous RfD indicated a consensus that the subject is not notable: Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requ...
Click to read more »Result: No consensus. This unblock request is denied with no prejudice against a future request, unless otherwise determined by consensus in the future...
Click to read more »deletion was to keep (no consensus). Even discounting the votes from editors who appeared to have been canvassed, there is no consensus that the subject of...
Click to read more »Keep. Due to a lack of conversation, I am closing this discussion as no consensus.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:51, 13 March 2026 (UTC) GeoSpy...
Click to read more »different from a no consensus vote (where people clearly agree that they disagree). Deadlock is different from not reaching consensus. --Eptalon (talk)...
Click to read more »Rather then sounding like a broken record which not even makes sense, consensus aren't made on behalf of statements which doen't oppose a given statement...
Click to read more »ability to work well with others and their likelihood to be able to judge consensus or on whether or not to block someone etc. -Djsasso (talk) 14:41, 6 August...
Click to read more »hold 5 templates. If no one is gonna post a new comment to reach consensus (no consensus here yet), I will revert the pages to the version before you guys...
Click to read more »kept for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose is not clear. To talk about the subject, ask for input...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. A weak consensus here due to an overall lack of comment (which is an issue across RfD at...
Click to read more »easily, I'd be happy to take care of it. But voting isn't how we judge consensus, and I don't know why these templates have been around for so long. SteveTalk...
Click to read more »prevalent? -DJSasso (talk) 14:03, 26 July 2010 (UTC) Is there enough consensus that this page should be moved from userspace into WP: space? I would...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete --Auntof6 (talk) 18:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC) Adim (edit · talk...
Click to read more »intends to describe some aspect(s) of Wikipedia's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect varying levels of consensus and vetting....
Click to read more »500 log actions and almost 4500 edits. Fr33kman knows how to work with consensus, is extremely dedicated to the Encyclopedia (one of our best article reviewers...
Click to read more »the reason: Creation of project page intended for community use without consensus Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't...
Click to read more »was closed as a consensus to ban. But a closure does not a consensus make. If you read the discussion you will see there is no consensus for anything. Also...
Click to read more »kept for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose is not clear. To talk about the subject, ask for input...
Click to read more »Working with others Civility No personal attacks Harassment No legal threats Consensus Dispute resolution More Full list of policies List of guidelines...
Click to read more »me, indicates a clear consensus to keep. A close of no consensus (which defaults to keep), indicates there is no clear consensus either way, therefore...
Click to read more »aspect(s) of Wikipedia's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect varying levels of consensus and vetting. Shortcut WP:ORPHANWP:ORPHAN...
Click to read more »Working with others Civility No personal attacks Harassment No legal threats Consensus Dispute resolution More Full list of policies List of guidelines...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to No consensus.. No rough consensus as to the question of deletion. Jon@talk:~$ 22:58, 28 December...
Click to read more »deletion was to Delete. Consensus is to delete, considering the guideline related to this, and an indication that consensus is that this case does not...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. per previous consensus Operator873talkconnect 07:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC) Dhiraj Mishra (security...
Click to read more »or not. That is how consensus happens, by discussion. -DJSasso (talk) 18:50, 2 November 2011 (UTC) Do we need community consensus? Can't we just be WP:BOLD...
Click to read more »At this time I am going to have to say there is no clear consensus. As such a no consensus closure, stands at a keep. -- Enfcer (talk) 20:23, 31 May...
Click to read more »Pinging administrator:@Ferien Please start Deleting it, according to Consensus Thank you --🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 22:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC) Sakura...
Click to read more »Keep. Consensus to keep. Only argument supporting deletion is basically a "per nom' comment and does not represent sufficient reason (or consensus) to delete...
Click to read more »17:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC) Deletion discussions aren't votes; it's about consensus. An IP who simply writes "keep" and nothing else will very likely not...
Click to read more »experience in areas like RfDs, where he has to make closures based on consensus. Gwib's statement -- that he couldn't always remain neutral -- gave me...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No Consensus -- Having ran longer then the proposed week, and the main votes are the...
Click to read more »for deletion was to Keep. as No Consensus This RfD has been open for over a month now. And there is no clear consensus even if you count as a straight...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Consensus appears to be delete, (6 deletes, 3 keeps), though with the possibility of being recreated if there's some consensus on WP:ST over...
Click to read more »(UTC) You need to have consensus before you can request the importer rights on Meta. So far, you have not achieved consensus from the community. Please...
Click to read more »customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect varying levels of consensus and vetting. Shortcuts WP:RLWP:RL WP:REDWP:RED WP:REDLINKWP:REDLINK...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Clear consensus to delete Peterdownunder (talk) 22:34, 24 April 2022 (UTC) Category:Women...
Click to read more »aggressive and confrontational an attitude and 3) lack of understanding of consensus in the RfX process. Diffs were requested to show examples of confrontaion...
Click to read more »for me: The voting mechanism counter-wiki - we ought to be advocating consensus, not votes. The support % + min # of votes results in stupid results,...
Click to read more »we've been discussing this last week and a half have basically reached consensus. I would really like a few people to come and comment on the final wording...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Non consensus to delete --Auntof6 (talk) 18:39, 10 October 2022 (UTC) Boudewijn Paans...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete, and a lot was added after this RFD started --Auntof6 (talk)...
Click to read more »there was community consensus to even though the community would not know what was to be undeleted until after there was consensus. Because of this, I...
Click to read more »centered on the use of images (now removed), and that there already was consensus to delete the article in another RFD (which I don't find at the moment...
Click to read more »There seems to be consensus to keep the article protected, that's great. (Personally, I disagree with it, but if that's the consensus, I can accept that)...
Click to read more »customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect varying levels of consensus and vetting. Shortcuts WP:SCWP:SC WP:SHORTWP:SHORT WP:CUTSWP:CUTS...
Click to read more »kept for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose is not clear. To talk about the subject, ask for input...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. There is sufficient consensus to close this as deleted. Most users appear to agree that the category...
Click to read more »sentence (which is the case most of the time), there is no Wikipedia consensus on whether it should be used. The names of railroads and railways do not...
Click to read more »by unregistered users and Tri27 as one opinion, there's not really any consensus to delete this. There are issues with the referencing, and it's disappointing...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. per consensus below. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 18:52, 18 May 2013 (UTC) Lorenzo Iorio (edit...
Click to read more »general consensus is enough. Maybe administrators should be the ones closing these since they usually have more experience with deciding consensus? -- RyanCross...
Click to read more »conflicts of interest, personal attacks or sweeping generalizations. Find consensus, avoid edit wars, follow the three-revert rule, and remember that there...
Click to read more »making an improvement, then why was his version deleted through community consensus at RfD? He was asked twice on his talk page to not edit the article. COI...
Click to read more »such as merging. Quick delete previous discussion is here. Very clear consensus to delete. --Belwine (talk) 20:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »cup of tea or coffee and a sit down Wikipedia works on the spirit of consensus. Disputes should be settled through civil discussion rather than power...
Click to read more »policies List of guidelines Follow English Wikipedia Project-wide principles Consensus Solving disputes Ignore all rules What Wikipedia is not Core content policies...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:49, 4 August 2022 (UTC) The Corn Harvesters...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete --Auntof6 (talk) 06:45, 12 April 2018 (UTC) Jalal Movaghar (edit...
Click to read more »(e/c) You'll need to change community consensus. The last time this was discussed (a month or two ago), no consensus was reached to allow fair-use images...
Click to read more »links should normally be excluded by default unless and until there is a consensus to include them. Syntax Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Wikilinking) Wikipedia:Policies...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to slight consensus to keep.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 15:39, 17 February...
Click to read more »security concerns which appear to be resolved, barring that, there is a consensus for promotion. Thank you to all the participants. Jon@talk:~$ 11:53, 20...
Click to read more »me. However, deliberate changes in established practice do need a new consensus, so in such cases everyone is not entitled to do what they like without...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC) List of people...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Clear consensus to delete Peterdownunder (talk) 22:30, 24 April 2022 (UTC) List of women...
Click to read more »kept for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose is not clear. To talk about the subject, ask for input...
Click to read more »oversightship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it. Not demoted - No consensus to remove the admin access. -Barras (talk) 17:25, 2 April 2011 (UTC) Huji...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) I believe consensus was for Purplebackpack89's block to run from when he was first blocked. There was weak consensus about the length of time...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus below is for deletion. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:13, 22 October 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. There is a consensus to delete all of these lists. --Ferien (talk) 08:39, 3 September 2021...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:16, 20 December 2022 (UTC) Minions & More...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Ferien (talk) 18:37, 1 October 2022 (UTC) Innosilicon (edit...
Click to read more »discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. No Consensus to delete. -DJSasso (talk) 14:06, 18 June 2019 (UTC) Chicka chicka 123...
Click to read more »6 April 2008 (UTC) I think it's pretty clear we're not going to have consensus on this. It would need to be pretty overwhelming in Benniguy's favor in...
Click to read more »Keep. Article present in other wikis, and improved since nomination; consensus is to keep.--Eptalon (talk) 13:09, 15 May 2015 (UTC) Eolian processes...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete, plus no valid reason given to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:24...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Complete speculation, consensus to delete. Vermont (talk) 16:12, 22 May 2019 (UTC) Grand Theft Auto VI...
Click to read more »Why? There seems to be no consensus to do this. Those RFDs are completely separate from this discussion. There is consensus to delete them at the RFDs...
Click to read more »grant the tool. The editor must meet certain requirements: Gain a local consensus Have a minimum of three months on the project Have a minimum of 200 mainspace...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus to delete Operator873talkconnect 16:06, 7 January 2019 (UTC) Gan Lu (Jiangxite...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus to delete. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 09:47, 5 March 2011 (UTC) Katie Anderson...
Click to read more »ion/Sadakat_Aman_Khan the same enwp RFD which seems to have unanimous consensus to delete per TOOSOON Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 09:39, 31 October 2021...
Click to read more »discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Consensus was to redirect. --Ferien (talk) 07:52, 18 September 2021 (UTC) Wikipedia:Tertiary...
Click to read more »project If community consensus for this project is attained, I'll begin developing the proposed implements immediately. If consensus is obtained, I want...
Click to read more »page not like per enwp an information page. It will be good to get local consensus to give full authority to give like say a 1 year ban on Simple for something...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to No consensus.. There was no consensus as to the question of deletion. Jon@talk:~$ 22:57, 28 December...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. No consensus to have a redirect at this time --Ferien (talk) 16:57, 10 March 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »notable enough, make your case on the appropriate talk pages, and seek consensus first, both with the notability and any proposed autobiography. Conflict...
Click to read more »people's thoughts on foreign-language redirects", despite there being no consensus on the redirects. It doesn't really represent the thoughts of everyone...
Click to read more »problems here. Razorflame 00:09, 9 August 2009 (UTC) Based on community consensus. --§ Snake311 (I'm Not Okay!) 03:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC) why not --vector...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete and deletion is not cleanup. --Ferien (talk) 20:51, 8 October...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. General consensus is that the location of a person's death is not a meaningful criteria...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Whaat I see below is a consensus to keep..--Eptalon (talk) 16:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC) EmailSanta.com (edit...
Click to read more »and I'm able to read source code in a couple of languages. I can judge consensus in permissions discussions. I'd like to mop a bit more. I've been an admin...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC) List of people...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus to delete.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 14:38, 4 February 2022 (UTC) King Uche...
Click to read more »was to Delete. Deletion is not about cleanup, especially at RfD. The consensus here is that the issue is notability, which cannot be solved at an RfD...
Click to read more »day. At the very least it should be removed until a consensus is reached for it, because consensus in the past (when I think it had more vandalism) was...
Click to read more »reason: Fails general notability guidelines and was deleted by community consensus in July 2020 on English Wikipedia. see prior AfD discussion on en.Wiki...
Click to read more »discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. No consensus to remove adminship at the moment –Juliancolton | Talk 00:20, 15 November...
Click to read more »original request for deletion, and to be clear, I have no issues with the consensus/closure. It's just the main reason for deletion no longer applies. --Ferien...
Click to read more »"content forking". The proper solution to disagreement like this is to seek consensus through dispute resolution. If an article is deleted, its history is removed...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus on what to do with the article, although I do see a consensus that something with the article's name...
Click to read more »was to Keep. Over a week after the closing date, I don't see a clear consensus to delete...--Eptalon (talk) 19:17, 14 July 2023 (UTC) Category:Drug traffickers...
Click to read more »kept for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose is not clear. To talk about the subject, ask for input...
Click to read more »on right away, there needs to be a community consensus to do so, and I respect what ever the consensus is. I'm not saying to not create 1 liner articles...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete --Auntof6 (talk) 07:45, 30 March 2025 (UTC) Siege of Kemah (edit...
Click to read more »(UTC) Can someone point me to the discussion where we had a community consensus to change the icons for good and very good articles please. I think we've...
Click to read more »describing the category of motion pictures. No changes until a community consensus is reached please. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:09, 21 March 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »for copyright) If people are willing to wait a day or two we can get consensus and I can grab the import flag from the stewards for an hour or two and...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC) Category:Former...
Click to read more »standard time, and having no discussion, in my opinion, is the same as no consensus, and being closed, as such. -- Enfcer (talk) 20:10, 22 July 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »that's me.Let's talk. I can't see anything in WP:STYLE, but is there any consensus about using non-standard letters. Ho Chi Minh is simple but recently moved...
Click to read more »its own article as it might confuse the readers. If we can just gain a consensus here, then I can do the merger quickly. And also, high-functioning autism...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Keep. Article improved since nomination; consensus is to keep --Eptalon (talk) 13:05, 15 May 2015 (UTC) Antiquarian (edit...
Click to read more »I candidate myself to this role, I promise to act upon the Community consensus. --vector ^_^ (talk) 18:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC) Support, a young user...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Consensus was to keep, but improvement needed --Peterdownunder (talk) 05:32, 27...
Click to read more »as unlikely typos on his talkpage. I'd like to bring it to ST to see consensus on the matter. I created a list of redirects here, though the list may...
Click to read more »(talk) 11:08, 8 June 2009 (UTC) The outcome was The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Looks like a clear consensus, nominator consent....
Click to read more »all this stuff are actually mandated to read and understand the consensus. The consensus is formed from reading opinion, not counting green crosses and...
Click to read more »Delete. This has been open for a little over two weeks and there is consensus that all the subcategories except that for centenarians should be deleted...
Click to read more »There is a consensus here among pretty much everyone that the artist who made this painting is definitely notable. However, there is a consensus that there...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. consensus is not to keep --Peterdownunder (talk) 22:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus to delete on the basis of not meeting notability guidelines. Vermont (talk)...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Clear consensus to delete Peterdownunder (talk) 22:08, 23 April 2022 (UTC) Category:Jews...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete, and has been redirected. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:45, 12 March 2017...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. consensus to delete.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 20:20, 3 November 2021 (UTC) Ama, his wife...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. consensus to delete.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 20:22, 3 November 2021 (UTC) Amara Enyia...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Per consensus. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:02, 2 February 2012 (UTC) The Investigations...
Click to read more »Keep. Whilst the explanation for notability has not been given, the consensus is that the sources are good enough --Ferien (talk) 20:10, 17 August 2021...
Click to read more »reason to keep it. Would it be possible to use this moment to arrive at consensus for sysops to be able to delete unused templates such as these without...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No Consensus - After reviewing the QD of this article there was no claim of notability...
Click to read more »of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete or keep, so default to no consensus keep. Goblin 16:06, 19 April 2010 (UTC) I ♥ Meganmccarty...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Result was no consensus with consensus slightly favoring keep. Per that, this has been kept. Pmlineditor ∞...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Broad consensus to delete this; also look at page at the WHO. As far as I know, Omicron...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:31, 18 November 2024 (UTC) Shreya Jain...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:57, 5 August 2023 (UTC) Bianca's Kids (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 11:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC) The four calligraphy...
Click to read more »Rights Movement." I would be willing to do that, but wanted to learn the consensus of the group before we start on such a task. Thanks, Racepacket (talk)...
Click to read more »without. Therefore, it should be removed and it should regain community consensus before returning. STOP TURNING SIMPLE INTO EN!!! OTHERWISE WE WILL PROBABLY...
Click to read more »controversy if just quickly deleted. The purpose of RfDs are to reach consensus about the "fate" of an article. Thanks. SPQR 20:12, 4 March 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »appeared from almost nowhere and acted against a clear consensus. There is no clear consensus in favour of removing the autofellatio article, but according...
Click to read more »Please do not modify it. Closed as not successful. Percentage is far below consensus. Please try again later. -Barras (talk) 09:29, 25 January 2011 (UTC) Normandy (talk ·...
Click to read more »August 2010 (UTC) Done Moved back to Simple Talk for a more thorough consensus. Battleaxe9872 文/ テ 00:06, 1 September 2010 (UTC) You should have left...
Click to read more »Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC) We should reach consensus here before changing any cats, including Category:Chicago, Illinois, Category:Los...
Click to read more »to Delete. Only contained two entries, a physicist and an economist. Consensus below looks like a delete. EnWp has a category en:Category:Albanian scientists...
Click to read more »a consensus. So please don't jump to conclusions here. --Eptalon (talk) 09:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC) Of course. In order to achieve that consensus I am...
Click to read more »previously kept at an RFd in 2022, but I’m not seeing notability, and the consensus of that RFD was a little iffy (one weak keep, one keep by the creator...
Click to read more »cases that I am finding to be considered landmark, but I wanted to get a consensus before putting more effort into it. Thank you! --Lithorien (talk) 18:26...
Click to read more »with user rename (of vandal accounts). I will act upon the Community consensus. I'm an admin of this wiki from 5 month and I never abuse of sysop tools...
Click to read more »some aspect(s) of Wikipedia's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect varying levels of consensus and vetting. Shortcut WP:IWWP:IW...
Click to read more »wiki where the clearly isn't/wasn't consensus for such edits. By rights, they should all be deleted until consensus is reached. Just don't make any more...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete --Auntof6 (talk) 20:39, 12 May 2022 (UTC) François Boulangé...
Click to read more »summary was "The consensus wasn't delete, more people wanted to merge/keep the article. If you want, take it to AFD with an actual consensus" which translate...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. consensus to delete BRP ever 03:08, 9 April 2020 (UTC) Dhiraj Mishra (edit · talk...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Consensus is to keep. Peterdownunder (talk) 02:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC) Runway 34...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Consensus of votes to this point is to keep, and nominator has changed his/her mind...
Click to read more »discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. No Consensus to delete. -DJSasso (talk) 12:09, 3 May 2019 (UTC) Exotic pet (edit ·...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Consensus appears to be delete, (6 deletes, 3 keeps), though with the possibility of being recreated if there's some consensus on WP:ST over...
Click to read more »I believe we should assume "Silence equals consent" as described on Consensus Policy. Thanks, Huji 14:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC) I have made the change....
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 19:57, 25 January 2026 (UTC) Heikrujam (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus to delete fr33kman 00:34, 11 October 2023 (UTC) List of Eastern Caribbean...
Click to read more »for deletion was to Keep. / Redirected per consensus below, I'm wrapping this up early given the consensus below, no need to drag this on for 7 days –Davey2010Talk...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus. Chenzw Talk 14:45, 2 October 2012 (UTC) Hirokazu Goshi (edit · talk...
Click to read more »the time to write the guidelines down. At this point really its been consensus by silence that doing it this way is ok and guidelines are descriptive...
Click to read more »indefinite block remaining in place. If consensus does turn towards an unblock (right now it seems to be no consensus, leaning a bit towards oppose), then...
Click to read more »for another event. Any of the standards set below can be overruled by a consensus to ignore those standards in a given case. The lead section of a year...
Click to read more »Currently a user only needs to be here 4 days and he gets autoconfirmed. Does consensus support increasing this to 4 days/10 edits (requires a dev to change)...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete--Peterdownunder (talk) 13:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC) Auntof6 has...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Deleted per "consensus". Closing a few hours early; don't think something dramatic is likely...
Click to read more »(talk) 14:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC) Hi, RFD's work on consensus and so far there's no consensus to keep the article, Although you've commented keep and...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 11:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 2023 Cricket...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. I don't think the number of red links is excessive in context...
Click to read more »I'd like to see a consensus discussion as to whether administrators should "block first, discuss later". As far as I know, a consensus has not been reached...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. There is consensus that the subject is notable by virtue of her participation in the sport...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus to delete fr33kman 00:33, 14 September 2023 (UTC) Vita Liberte (edit ·...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Per the following consensus. Exert 23:26, 18 December 2010 (UTC) Deutsche Nationalhymne (edit · talk...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus Jon@talk:~$ 22:59, 28 December 2011 (UTC) Template:Sectstub (edit · talk...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. A weak consensus, this can be considered a WP:SOFTDELETE close. --Ferien (talk | join TBA...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete --Auntof6 (talk) 23:31, 5 March 2025 (UTC) Siege of Diyarbakir...
Click to read more »that link to such articles should be updated. I recommend that we have a consensus before doing any of these changes. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:58, 21 April 2018...
Click to read more »parties can explain to each other and work out something and decide on a consensus. Now I don't want the arbcom going on here, because that is just a drama-generating...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus. No comment on the reliability (or lack thereof) of the cited sources...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. There is clearly consensus to keep the categories in some form. Further discussion on this topic...
Click to read more »the discussion that took place on en WP is useful and I agree with the consensus there. Umpires are not inherently notable absent some specific, unique...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to keep (no consensus). Chenzw Talk 11:52, 8 December 2019 (UTC) Fethi Haddaoui (edit · talk...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. per consensus below. --Barras (talk) 17:36, 2 September 2009 (UTC) Serie B 2000–01 (edit...
Click to read more »be added. Vibhijain (talk) 16:15, 22 June 2011 (UTC) Relisted to get consensus. This discussion will now close on 5 July 2011. Pmlineditor (t · c · l)...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Deleted per consensus below. Barras talk 09:36, 20 June 2025 (UTC) Are modern Assyrians descendants...
Click to read more »A request will be made at Meta shortly. Note Per previous community consensus, all de-sysoppings due to inactivity can be reversed on the administrator's...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. Anyone who wants to is welcome to merge to the other article...
Click to read more »redirect with a QD. There was a discussion on this a couple months back and consensus was that non-admins shouldn't have it. -Djsasso (talk) 11:51, 18 January...
Click to read more »Closed as successful - More than five votes and all supports, clear consensus (my vote notwithstanding). -Barras talk 07:46, 12 April 2014 (UTC) Enfcer...
Click to read more »to this discussion. No input in almost a week, so closing this as no consensus to delete, thus The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. But I have moved the page to Plaque (movie) as there doesn't...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. consensus to delete.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:24, 24 October 2021 (UTC) Bukola Sawyerr...
Click to read more »people are watching it. Going through regular RfD, to get a community consensus. Eptalon (talk) 16:27, 24 May 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Ferien (talk) 15:45, 29 September 2021 (UTC) Laininghan Naoriya...
Click to read more »times over a couple of years without an RfD, so sending to RfD to get a consensus about the notability of DJ Parisa from the community. --Ferien (talk)...
Click to read more »8 May 2015 (UTC), in case this appeared to a closer as somehow not in consensus. Redirect per StevenJ81. --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log)...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Clear consensus for a speedy close Peterdownunder (talk) 22:29, 20 April 2022 (UTC) Elijah...
Click to read more »clarification of the usage of IAB management console to analysis a page, we have consensus here to deploy the bot and use the console to analyse a page. Basically...
Click to read more »No further edits should be made to this discussion. The result was no consensus. Lauryn Ashby (d) 15:40, 27 January 2010 (UTC) Oracle database (edit ·...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Delete. There is a consensus to delete the article as it stands, and a weak consensus to implement a redirect. The issue is with...
Click to read more »to this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to No consensus. Chenzw Talk 12:32, 29 February 2020 (UTC) Giovanni Dall'Orto (edit...
Click to read more »to, at least, clarify consensus on the revdel matter, and ensure that policy is updated to reflect changes in community consensus (if any). And although...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Discussion yielded no consensus; default was to keep. Pmlineditor ∞ 09:36, 9 February 2010 (UTC) FreeOTFE...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. Status quo. -Barras (talk) 09:59, 23 February 2011 (UTC) Category:Communes...
Click to read more »redlinks, not redirects. I would QD, although I'm not sure if there's consensus on it. This refers to multiple redirects: Reflec Beat Beatmania DANCERUSH...
Click to read more »notability - even though notability is suspect at best. Taking to RfD for consensus Enfcer (talk) 21:29, 23 May 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Speedy closed per consensus above and snow. Barras (talk) 14:33, 7 July 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:38, 30 November 2025 (UTC) New York (U2...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete --Auntof6 (talk) 05:18, 26 April 2025 (UTC) Glitch Productions...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. English Wikipedia has multiple similar pages, although theirs...
Click to read more »was to Keep. NonvocalScream (talk) 22:47, 1 September 2009 (UTC) No consensus. NonvocalScream (talk) 22:47, 1 September 2009 (UTC) Viscosity index (edit...
Click to read more »see if we can establish a consensus or not. This is a poll, not a !vote. It's merely to see if there is a growing consensus or not. No action will be...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Delete. There seems to be more of a consensus to delete, even if there are more keep !votes due to socks.. --Ferien...
Click to read more »rather than at QD, to generate community consensus for the deletion (or not, if there should be consensus that we need this template). Any documentation...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to keep (no consensus). Chenzw Talk 16:00, 1 September 2020 (UTC) Hussein Moheb (edit · talk...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No Consensus -- Enfcer (talk) 20:28, 18 November 2018 (UTC) Big Brother 8 (UK) (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus. Chenzw Talk 17:17, 5 May 2018 (UTC) Seemarekha (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to keep (no consensus). Chenzw Talk 12:10, 27 December 2022 (UTC) Roger Ruskin Spear (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Clear consensus to delete. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 11:43, 14 April 2011 (UTC) List of...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:28, 19 September 2021 (UTC) Mulgi Jhali...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete, and further research maybe needed to prove notability. The...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Non consensus to delete --Auntof6 (talk) 00:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC) Armenians (edit ·...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete, none of the delete !votes address why redirecting is not appropriate...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Nurgali Arystanov...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:58, 30 August 2024 (UTC) Waterford Baptist...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete, blatantly non-neutral, and not having consensus for deletion is not a reason for deletion. 88.110.38.249 (talk) 16:35...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:56, 24 October 2024 (UTC) Category:Video...
Click to read more »AFD (en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mouse Fitzgerald) however the consensus there thus far is to Redirect / Merge however 12 oz. Mouse doesn't exist...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:48, 20 February 2025 (UTC) Keka HR (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus to delete. Operator873 connect 18:48, 18 June 2023 (UTC) Mayor of Halloweentown...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Per "consensus" Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:10, 4 October 2011 (UTC) Valy Hedjasi (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete --Auntof6 (talk) 21:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC) Ivy Dominique...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Consensus is to merge, so keep at least until that is done. I leave it to interested/knowledgeable...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC) André Conte (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. If a move is desired, it can be done outside of this discussion...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 01:02, 24 June 2025 (UTC) Masahide Takahashi...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:26, 24 June 2025 (UTC) Erik Felderhof (edit...
Click to read more »and was not appropriate in this case. It is better to get a full RfD consensus instead of rushing the whole thing and G4 cannot be used if an article...
Click to read more »association - I think it's about 50/50 so whatever the consensus is here / or whatever consensus there has been already, a lot of category moving will...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Ferien (talk) 16:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC) LIV Swiss Watches...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:20, 25 October 2019 (UTC) Chase Tang (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete --Auntof6 (talk) 04:58, 19 May 2022 (UTC) Gupabal station (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete --Auntof6 (talk) 00:45, 6 May 2018 (UTC) Faisal Masood (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 01:50, 29 October 2017 (UTC) List of religions...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete.-BRP ever 08:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC) Round and Round the...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:06, 3 July 2022 (UTC) List of countries...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus to delete.--BRP ever 03:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC) The name honey (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus to delete.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:24, 14 November 2022 (UTC) Wikipedia:Administrators...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus was to delete Peterdownunder (talk) 22:31, 6 December 2020 (UTC) User:Tsugaru...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete--BRP ever 00:48, 22 June 2019 (UTC) User:Barliner/my boxes (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 15:50, 1 May 2022 (UTC) When the impostor...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete.-BRP ever 13:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC) List of gay, lesbian...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus to delete.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:20, 21 January 2022 (UTC) Pirbod (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Ferien (talk) 21:10, 8 October 2021 (UTC) Bihar Mahila Udyog...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:54, 15 February 2022 (UTC) OCaml (edit...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Consensus to keep.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC) Techmoan (edit...
Click to read more »and the definition on that page is good. So I am deleting this per the consensus below, and as Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Ferien (talk) 19:40, 24...
Click to read more »redirected multiple times, but the redirect is always removed. If the consensus is to redirect, it may be semi-protected on the redirect. Naleksuh (talk)...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus to delete Peterdownunder (talk) 22:06, 13 March 2025 (UTC) Pest Control...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus. Chenzw Talk 15:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC) Takahiro Endo (edit · talk...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus. Chenzw Talk 08:17, 10 January 2014 (UTC) Gifted education (edit · talk...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. consensus to delete fr33kman 18:55, 16 April 2012 (UTC) Category:Japanese football...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus. Chenzw Talk 16:17, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Lorenzo Iorio (edit · talk...
Click to read more »discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. No consensus -Djsasso (talk) 14:11, 5 November 2021 (UTC) A. B. M Abdur Rahim (edit...
Click to read more »Voceditenore (talk) 08:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC) Worth obtaining community consensus so it can be G4'd in the future. The claims of notability mean it does...
Click to read more »least one baseless oppose, though I'm sure the difference between valid consensus and pure vote counting is clear Soup Dish (talk) 17:14, 26 February 2010...
Click to read more »for deletion was to Keep. /redirecting to Wikipedia:Proposed very good articles per consensus. -- American Eagle (talk) 19:17, 28 October 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. per consensus.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 15:52, 18 September 2011 (UTC) FIFA World Cup 1954...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete --Ferien (talk) 15:27, 27 September 2021 (UTC) Rebecca Sealfon...
Click to read more »for deletion was to Delete. per not establishing notability and clear consensus —Clementina talk 08:46, 28 August 2010 (UTC) Tu vuo' fa' l'americana (edit...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Extending to establish consensus. --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 06:24, 25 April 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete --Auntof6 (talk) 20:44, 12 May 2022 (UTC) Yola Mgogwana (edit...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Non-admin close - consensus to keep. Goblin 23:16, 21 June 2013 (UTC) I ♥ Jersey! The Dark (novel)...
Click to read more »for 1 more week til 19:03, 23 April 2014 (UTC) to gain more votes for consensus. Enfcer (talk) 03:54, 17 April 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus to delete as failing notability guideline. Vermont (talk) 16:38, 9 December...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Consensus to keep. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:22, 19 February 2016 (UTC) Me and...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Consensus is to keep as notable.Peterdownunder (talk) 00:11, 8 March 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. The consensus of this request for deletion was to Redirect. There is not much to merge...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wanted to see if consensus was for having this and Vice President of the United States as seperate...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Not notable, consensus to delete. Vermont (talk) 22:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC) Yuvraj Raghuvanshi...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. per fixes and consensus Pmlineditor ∞ 09:24, 20 May 2010 (UTC) 30 minut (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »references to Simple Wiktionary without discussion despite community consensus. Archer7 | talk 09:43, 27 May 2006 (UTC) User:Pg2114 (also User:Timark...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 11:24, 19 January 2017 (UTC) List of caravanserais...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete--Peterdownunder (talk) 04:32, 20 August 2015 (UTC) College Boulevard...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete at this time. --Ferien (talk) 17:25, 30 November 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:31, 7 April 2016 (UTC) Radical Face (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:13, 29 October 2013 (UTC) WikiMANNia (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:51, 22 January 2017 (UTC) Bothriospondylus...
Click to read more »discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. No consensus to delete.-DJSasso (talk) 17:22, 28 February 2019 (UTC) David Frederick...
Click to read more »notification was not done. However, a proper close was conducted and community consensus was reflected accurately. I have no issues with the process or the closer's...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus is to delete, and page content does not meet the guideline for user pages...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No Consensus & Article has changed. If someone feels it needs to be re-addressed please...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. consensus for deletion fr33kman 21:25, 8 September 2023 (UTC) Unidentified (edit...
Click to read more »the purpose of ST was to conduct discussions like this for community consensus. Vermont (talk) 04:30, 21 January 2019 (UTC) Administrator note: Moving...
Click to read more »a strong scientific consensus that the Earth is warming and that this warming is mainly caused by human activities. This consensus is supported by various...
Click to read more »Pinging administrator:@Ferien Please start Deleting article, according to Consensus Thank you 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 22:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC) No need...
Click to read more »13 October 2021 (UTC) Note More than a week has passed since, and the consensus for that article is to keep. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 17:16, 14 October...
Click to read more »due to this. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus to delete per non-notable fr33kman talk 02:18, 15 March 2009 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »there to enable admins to close the requests on time with more of a "consensus". Regards, Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:24, 21 March 2012 (UTC) Yeah, as...
Click to read more »I'd like to ask why you got the decision to delete without any kind of consensus. Why are you better than everyone else? T. Moitie - Talk - Esperanza 16:42...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. There isn't a consensus to delete here. --Ferien (talk) 10:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC) Manuel Menezes...
Click to read more »deletion was to Delete. Most keep votes from a now-blocked user, community consensus is to delete--Eptalon (talk) 09:26, 17 May 2020 (UTC) Indrajeet Singh...
Click to read more »You are not addressing the issue: we make our decisions, based on our consensus, and we are not bound by what En wiki does to their equivalent pages....
Click to read more »20:55, 24 November 2012 (UTC) The problem with local consensus is that you have to have to get consensus every single time you have a disagreement instead...
Click to read more »should have put something down: Its a question of judgement. There was consensus for the block of Static, yet he decided to undo my block stating that...
Click to read more »decide on the consensus result, like an RfD. This would be better than many discussions in which discussion stops without a consensus being reached....
Click to read more »can not be seen... I propose that they are de-sysoped, if there is a consensus, but I absolutely do not see any reason for blocking their account. --M7...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Per consensus below. Albacore (talk · changes) 22:12, 3 April 2011 (UTC) Yellow Arrows...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. And no consensus to move to userspace --Ferien (talk) 14:55, 1 April 2023 (UTC) Jonathan...
Click to read more »usually closed per WP:SNOW , though I have to say, there seems to be clear consensus. Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 11:01, 9 September 2009 (UTC) Support...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Keep. Non-admin closure - WP:SNOW close per consensus following changes made. Notable ethnic group. Goblin 05:49, 20 March 2011...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. Those interested are welcome to do a merge. --Auntof6 (talk)...
Click to read more »of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE, very weak consensus. Weighing things up this leans towards delete as WP:NACTOR requires important...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Delete. rather more quickly than usual per consensus below —Clementina talk 09:27, 13 January 2011 (UTC) Oksana Grishuk & Evgeny...
Click to read more »deletion or G11 deletion of the page, before it was suggested to seek a consensus on here. As already explained above, it's apparently more than likely...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 11:50, 23 January 2024 (UTC) SkyOS...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus to delete.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 17:58, 18 March 2025...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Deleted per the "consensus" reached below after 17 days. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:58, 25 July 2011...
Click to read more »- Notability not established through reliable sources. Agree with the consensus at the English Wikipedia AFD that perhaps the parent organization is notable...
Click to read more »Administrator note: I have re-listed this RfD for another week to allow for more consensus to be formed. -- Enfcer (talk) 19:45, 2 March 2015 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. There's a consensus to keep this article. Also the article has been improved and is no longer...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Keep. Also redirected to Long division per consensus. Chenzw Talk 02:51, 2 March 2020 (UTC) Long Division (edit · talk ·...
Click to read more »commented here, there is a proposal to change it to Main Page, however the consensus on it seems to be leaning oppose. Considering the size of their community...
Click to read more »prejudice to it being recreated if consensus is reached at WP:SSP this time around. If there was a clear consensus last time, I would expect we would...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. As per community consensus. This argument was pretty straightforward.-- Tdxiang 01:14, 14 September...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No clear consensus on this article, so closed as keep. Peterdownunder (talk) 07:10, 11 May...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Non-admin close - consensus to keep. Goblin 23:10, 21 June 2013 (UTC) I ♥ Pmlineditor! Guardians of...
Click to read more »for 1 more week til 19:14, 23 April 2014 (UTC) to gain more votes for consensus. Enfcer (talk) 03:55, 17 April 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Clear consensus for deletion, even including the LTA that created the article. Vermont...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. consensus to delete.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 20:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC) Amasty (edit...
Click to read more »You only have a mere 480+ edits, which is below than the 1000-edit mark consensus for adminship. I think it is obvious that you have started your RFA a...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to keep (no consensus). Subject meets criterion 2 of NFOOTY. With that said, NFOOTY#2 provides...
Click to read more »usefulness, and I have read the arguments and decided there is a reasonable consensus for deletion. Peterdownunder (talk) 22:49, 23 April 2022 (UTC) List of...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Discussion yielded no consensus; default to keep. Page moved to Raje per our English counterpart. Pmlineditor ∞...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. per consensus below. All pages in the list are in Category:Kitchenware or one of it's...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:58, 24 October 2024 (UTC) Category:Video...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:00, 24 October 2024 (UTC) Category:Existentialist...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Comment: I think the consensus has always been that communities, however small, are notable (we have...
Click to read more »across soft redirects to seWiki before but I don't know what the current consensus is. Rus793 (talk) 18:22, 14 June 2014 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »participation - a delete per nom "vote" doesn't really help build a stronger consensus. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:06, 3 July 2025 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. consensus leans to delete fr33kman 00:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC) Chicago Pizza...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. BRP ever 14:21, 16 January 2025 (UTC) Pratihar Rajputs (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Per consensus and also because it is a hoax. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 08:27, 29 January...
Click to read more »when this page was previously deleted. This RfD discussion does show a consensus to delete though, so I'm going to restore the page then delete it with...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete, because the only argument for deleting was "not notable". --Auntof6...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:14, 14 May 2023 (UTC) Just Riadh (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete, nor to which article it could be merged. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:13...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus for deletion Operator873talkconnect 01:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC) Logarithmic...
Click to read more »Parliament. Engagement was poor overall resulting in what I imagine to be a no consensus keep. Reviewing the sources, they are still really poor - a few don't...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Clear consensus to keep. Operator873 connect 05:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC) One Thing Remains...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. per consensus below. Clearly not notable. --Barras (talk) 18:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »been no past RfD. Restoring and redeleting to point to this RfD as a consensus to delete for this article. --Ferien (talk) 22:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC) Miss...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. consensus to quick delete fr33kman 12:22, 27 September 2024 (UTC) Initiative (edit...
Click to read more »discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. The consensus of this request to deletion was to Redirect --Ferien (talk) 19:07, 12...
Click to read more »discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. The consensus of this request for deletion was to Redirect. --Ferien (talk) 19:05, 12...
Click to read more »aren't actively being used for testing. I wonder if we can come to a consensus that they can be deleted if they meet certain conditions. I'll throw these...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Consensus exists that the subject meets our notability guideline. Vermont (talk)...
Click to read more »article) has a history of including promotional articles and the general consensus is not to accept it as a reliable source in such context. Djsasso (talk)...
Click to read more »discussion when the consensus is in favor of the ban. For a ban to be lifted, there has to be another community discussion where the consensus is to lift the...
Click to read more »Regarding "regrouping of consensus" (my words): either there is a consensus or there is not yet consensus.--There was not consensus at the time (but we might...
Click to read more »judges and also its detracting from the point of the cup. Currently I see consensus for closure. BG7even 15:31, 15 December 2008 (UTC) Why would I even start...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Non-admin close - consensus to keep. Goblin 23:10, 21 June 2013 (UTC) I ♥ Chenzw! The Named (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Clear consensus to delete. --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 18:54, 27 December...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Per no consensus. Exert 02:02, 19 December 2010 (UTC) Michael Kühntopf (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus. --Ferien (talk) 15:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC) Mahmoud Refaat (edit · talk...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to keep (no consensus). Chenzw Talk 03:18, 1 February 2021 (UTC) Tadzio Müller (edit · talk...
Click to read more »talk (and IRC) and continued to flood. Consensus rules all, and continuing to make edits that are against consensus (i.e. mass deleting with flood flag)...
Click to read more »deletion was to Delete. Virtiually unuused template, full of red-links; consensus to delete. --Eptalon (talk) 20:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC) Template:Chinatowns...
Click to read more »entries. Darkfrog24 (talk) 20:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC) Comment: see the consensus on enwiki here —Belwine (talk) 21:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC) Delete nothing...
Click to read more »appears to be the first time it's been created here so lets get community consensus on whether or not this subject is notable or if this is advertising....
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No Clear Consensus --— Preceding unsigned comment added by Enfcer (talk • contribs) 20:13...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Deleted per consensus. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 10:59, 4 March 2012 (UTC) PPT (edit · talk ·...
Click to read more »altogether. The only way an article can be promoted is with community consensus. Who edited it on the way is irrelevant. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:43...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus to delete is clear; SOCK accounts disregarded fr33kman 01:29, 21 September...
Click to read more »used in mags and papers in print or on the web. Anyway, if there's no consensus, we'll leave the page as it is. End of story! Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:13...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. However, no consensus as to how to handle the other (duplicate) template. Chenzw Talk 01:43...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Clear consensus for a speedy deletion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterdownunder...
Click to read more »policies List of guidelines Follow English Wikipedia Project-wide principles Consensus Solving disputes Ignore all rules What Wikipedia is not Core content policies...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. clear consensus --Ferien (talk) 15:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC) Code Kakori (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »Delete. As the closing admin/crat, I'm supposed to look at consensus and I see clear consensus to delete because of lack of notability / lack of reliable...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Ferien (talk) 15:31, 27 September 2021 (UTC) Angom Gopi (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus to delete. Vermont (talk) 00:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC) W-PuTTY-CD (edit ·...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus to delete.--BRP ever 03:58, 15 December 2018 (UTC) Athanasio Celia (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete --Auntof6 (talk) 04:43, 5 March 2022 (UTC) British folk (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Peterdownunder (talk) 21:40, 20 August 2019 (UTC) John Margetson...
Click to read more »this discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. consensus to keep--BRP ever 22:19, 21 December 2019 (UTC) Gowling WLG (edit · talk...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:22, 1 November 2018 (UTC) Seven dirty words...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus is to delete Peterdownunder (talk) 07:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC) List of...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete --Auntof6 (talk) 04:40, 5 March 2022 (UTC) Ulster Scots folk...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus was to delete Peterdownunder (talk) 11:04, 13 December 2020 (UTC) Donald...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus was to deletePeterdownunder (talk) 11:16, 27 November 2020 (UTC) Songs...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus to delete.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 14:26, 4 February 2022 (UTC) List of countries...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete --Auntof6 (talk) 03:55, 8 August 2021 (UTC) Vito Scotti (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus was to delete. Peterdownunder (talk) 10:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC) Category:Venezuelan...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus was to delete. Peterdownunder (talk) 10:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC) Category:Caribbean...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. BRP ever 07:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC) Ayşegül Coşkun (edit...
Click to read more »seem relevant to me. For me, this is persuasive because it suggests a consensus which was reached by a wider group of opinions than we are able to poll...
Click to read more »Scythians that has been suggested numerous times. So, the common scientific consensus is POV pushing? Very unlikely.--Al-Zaynir (talk) 16:25, 16 April 2022...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus. Jon@talk:~$ 02:01, 31 March 2011 (UTC) Category:Seven deadly sins (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. There is consensus to delete.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 15:06, 17 November 2021 (UTC) Utkarsh Raj...
Click to read more »consensus to remove is required for a steward to lose his status, however I think it's fairer to the community if every steward needed the consensus to...
Click to read more »Keep. This RfD was originally intended for the template only, and no consensus for deletion of the template was achieved. No comment on the other articles...
Click to read more »should stay. This is called consensus. :) –Juliancolton | Talk 02:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC) Two or three editors is not a consensus.-- † CM16 02:54, 16 April...
Click to read more »aspect(s) of Wikipedia's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect varying levels of consensus and vetting. Shortcut WP:PATROLWP:PATROL...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Per consensus below--Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:39, 11 September 2010 (UTC) Def Tech (edit...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Consensus below to delete.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 02:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC) Numberjacks...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Clear consensus to keep--Eptalon (talk) 17:07, 27 August 2021 (UTC) User:Cuaxdon (edit...
Click to read more »wiki that have quite a lot of non-native speakers visiting. There is no consensus here to delete. Also note this redirect exists on the English Wikipedia...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. per consensus. Eptalon's summary is worth everyone's time to read. The Rambling Man...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete, although it appears we should review our user page guidelines--Peterdownunder...
Click to read more »