Redirect to:
Our motto is "Be bold!", which is basically: "Go for it". The Wikipedia community encourages users to be bold when editing. You cannot break Wikipedia...
Click to read more »If a rule stops you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it. Wikipedia:Be bold Wikipedia:Do not make problems to prove something...
Click to read more »that it was to be kept. --Aaqib Waramchoi (talk) 19:46, 10 June 2013 (UTC) Bold (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) Aaqib Waramchoi has...
Click to read more »apostrophes on both sides) '''bold''' appears as bold. (3 apostrophes on both sides) '''''bolded italics''''' appears as bolded italics. (5 apostrophes on...
Click to read more »is typically online. The list is alphabetical by default. Admins are in bold. Note: A list of administrators can be found here: List of administrators...
Click to read more »rules for writing articles for the Simple English Wikipedia. Wikipedia:Be bold Wikipedia:Citing sources Wikipedia:How to write Simple English pages Wikipedia:Manual...
Click to read more »If you know of something interesting that you feel like writing about, be bold and DO IT! ... that Did you know needs more hooks? If you know of or come...
Click to read more »to change! Anyone can change almost any page, and we encourage you to Be bold! Find something that can be improved and make it better. Maybe you know something...
Click to read more »Make suggestions for articles you'd like to appear in the next edition of Simple News, or you can be bold and create one yourself!...
Click to read more »articles every Wikipedia should have/Version 1.4. Some of the articles are in bold. That means that it is very important that they be written. For a very long...
Click to read more »hook is to feature one article. This main article is the link which is in bold. This article must meet the DYK rules. Any other links in the hook are minor...
Click to read more »better. Remember, our motto — and our invitation to the newcomer — is be bold. We have a set of rules, standards, and traditions. Some of the newcomers...
Click to read more »you like the looks of. The subject of the article should be mentioned in bold text ('''subject''') in the first sentence, or at least the first paragraph...
Click to read more »Be BOLD There are lots of things to remember when making changes to Wikipedia. The most important thing is to not be scared of making these changes. Don't...
Click to read more »early as possible in the article. Bold the article title the first (and only the first) time it is used. Also, bold any important synonyms – other names...
Click to read more »for deletion was to Delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:31, 13 July 2014 (UTC) Boldness (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request...
Click to read more »removed from the page. If it's a very large number (which may also appear as bold text), there's a good chance that it could be vandalism. Change summary -...
Click to read more »A WikiLion is a editor who makes bold edits, feel free to give them a reward whenever you like They help the project alot by reverting vandals, helping...
Click to read more »the subject; the Wikipedia article is not based mainly on such sources. Be bold! If you can find sources for the information in the article, please do add...
Click to read more »com/ this] How to format font, such as italics (''italics'') and bold text ('''bold text''') How to add section headers, with == Section == How to add...
Click to read more »should be wikified to a certain extent. This includes link to other pages, bold and italics text where needed, infobox, pictures etc. The content of the...
Click to read more »And we should stop discussion about how and why, we should do it and be bold (at least sometimes). Agreed, discussions are long but we fail to /do/ anything...
Click to read more »needs something else, that extra spice to make it really good. Do it. Be bold, and go for it. Let us know here first though, and we can all help you out...
Click to read more »their talk page, and say why you have given it to them. Do not hesitate: be bold! The idea of using the barnstar as a Wiki award was created by SunirShah...
Click to read more »Compare the bolded text of One/Two, against the stark contrast, of the shortcut title of this essay page: WP:TYPESET. In Wikipedia, the use of bold-faced text...
Click to read more »requirements. Razorflame 22:06, 16 February 2008 (UTC) Feel free to edit them, be bold. --Gwib -(talk)- 22:07, 16 February 2008 (UTC) There is a discussion on the...
Click to read more »one here really is part of a WikiProject. On the other hand I'd be "being bold" which is a good thing. I'm not sure which direction to follow is better:...
Click to read more »are deemed especially necessary for any Wikipedia to have, are marked in bold; like the list itself, these selections should not be viewed as dictating...
Click to read more »not have firm rules besides the five general principles presented here. Be bold in changing, moving, and modifying articles. Although it should be aimed...
Click to read more »system Please do not bite the newcomers Editing guidelines Article size Be bold Hatnotes Signatures Subpages Talk page User pages WikiProjects Classification...
Click to read more »bolded or bolded and italic, does anybody else think we should go with one or the other? Oysterguitarist 04:48, 25 July 2007 (UTC) It should be bold,...
Click to read more »tendency to do things incorrectly, which is fine when you're editing pages (per bold), but a tool like Import needs to be used carefully and can result in a lot...
Click to read more »faster, and less emotional than taking the time to type a complaint. So be bold! - go out there and do some copy-editing now! If you find an article that...
Click to read more »infobox, commonscat (or sisterlinks), or even something as simple as bolding the first appearance of the subjects title in the intro. {{Stub}} - for...
Click to read more »1. Welcome 2. Formatting text 3. Linking other pages 4. Talk pages 5. Important things 6. Be bold 7. You are done...
Click to read more »Checked 18 points Article 1 Article 2 (triple means bolded on WP:VA; double means on WP:VA, but not bolded) Homer (triple) (diff) - 3 Checked 3 points Question...
Click to read more »incivility. I don't think you understand the subtleties of en:WP:SPADE, WP:BOLD, WP:CIVIL, and WP:AGF. You're a good editor and I appreciate the bot work...
Click to read more »This is also untrue, and harmful because it discourages people from being bold and jumping right in. Kansan (talk) 16:34, 1 May 2010 (UTC) Q: Why do you...
Click to read more »Henry Ford (triple points for being a bolded article} Checked 6 points Madagascar diff; page went from 695 characters to 2056. Checked 1 point...
Click to read more »work Soup Dish (talk) 17:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC) At least you still bolded the support in the vote :). Razorflame 17:54, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Support...
Click to read more »behind the scenes. WikiFallens, editors banned from the wiki. WikiLions, bold editors. WikiFairies, editors helping "beautify" (make beautiful) the encyclopedia...
Click to read more »or be bolded. --Cromwellt|talk|contribs 01:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC) I find it more obnoxious to have a star then be in the top of the box or bolded, but either...
Click to read more »of HTML. Everyone who edits Wikipedia regularly knows the way to make '''bold''' and ''italics'', so I'm not going to dwell on those: instead I'm going...
Click to read more »make a lot more sense now. all pretty-fied as long as you don't mind big bold red-links. -- Creol(talk) 22:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC) When I look at http://simple...
Click to read more »plan was always to move it after this issue anyway, I was just going to Be Bold ;). As for pages, we already have a template for new issues, and an archive...
Click to read more »Be bold. Modify it. Pmlinediter Talk 10:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC) Being bold does not apply to all situations. Changing focus is too radical for WP:BOLD --...
Click to read more »useless. Use it at your discretion, not at the discretion of others. Be bold! obentomusubi 20:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC) CE/BCE is the correct form for scholarly...
Click to read more »Just using policies from simple I'd point to WP:Ignore all rules and WP:Bold and if you'd like a selection of some of my favorite essays/policies from...
Click to read more »25 May 2009 (UTC) Yes, they are, Grrr!!! In fact I think I'll just be WP:BOLD and nuke this article via WP:SNOW. fr33kman talk 04:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »waited long enough for responses? Would anyone have a problem if I just be bold and pick one of the options? The reason I'm interested in this is that some...
Click to read more »editor is a bad rule? --Eptalon (talk) 06:54, 1 July 2008 (UTC) I'll be bold: What would change, if the guidelines were policies? - We'd had to go through...
Click to read more »Would expanding the article, even if only by simplifying that one line and bolding the name of the article in the first paragraph, be more suitable, perhaps...
Click to read more »(UTC) My problem was more the section where this comment was and why in bold. But ok. Barras (talk) 16:47, 24 April 2009 (UTC) First, this isn't a hard...
Click to read more »Deadstar (talk) 15:06, 5 May 2011 (UTC) Whilst I'm always one for being WP:BOLD. Since this is my first time, I thought I would check with you guys first...
Click to read more »(if possible) hack into wikipedia, and change user's rights etc. Is the be bold policy or the ignore all rules one acceptable for administrative actions...
Click to read more »Co-nomination from Goblin 19:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Kennedy!: I'd like to be bold and add my co-nomination. Philosopher has been a very helpful and active...
Click to read more »waiting forever - the only way things get done around here are thanks to WP:BOLD and WP:IAR. Goblin 17:21, 10 September 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Bsadowski1! I disagree...
Click to read more »And the system adds it italics so we get a ''' (bold) + '. And most people never even notice the bolded link sitting there. The system notices this though...
Click to read more »(UTC) Go ahead, be bold! And list it here. Chenzw Talk 09:15, 20 June 2008 (UTC) Ack, what am I thinking. I should always be bold. :P I'll go right ahead...
Click to read more »autoEdHeadlines(str) { //MAIN FUNCTION describes list of fixes // Remove bold from section headings var loopcount = 0; while( str.search(/^[=]{1...
Click to read more »there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Be bold and just merge them. I don't see that it needs a discussion. There aren't...
Click to read more »think MediaWiki:Autoblocker could be simplified a bit, and removing the bold on the block message might make it look better. You have been autoblocked...
Click to read more »have more stuff, like thanking users for their changes, telling them to be bold, to sign their posts etc.. The welcome templates would be more useful for...
Click to read more »would not able to include colour in the formatting and that even just using Bold and Italics would be fiddly and take days. Would i be able to come back to...
Click to read more »show up in bold. Could it have something to do with the font you use? --Auntof6 (talk) 19:38, 4 May 2014 (UTC) Nothing has ever shown as bold on my watchlist...
Click to read more »relevant POVs, not just what one person thinks." {emphasis in italics = bold added). A point of view which is informed and supported by inline citation...
Click to read more »to collaberate on this article. Perhaps start a WikiProject? Remember, be bold, try editing and improving it yourself. Regards, ← κεηηε∂γ (talk) 13:49,...
Click to read more »case you hadn't noticed the demotions link in the RecentChanges template go bold (indicating there's an active nomination), I discovered a fair number of...
Click to read more »(UTC) @TOMI don't think that that would be a good icon. @Bluegoblin7: WP:BOLD. Go ahead and make one yourself :P. Surprise us! Razorflame 23:43, 26 March...
Click to read more »if it will give more information than could be found without the list. Be bold. --rimshottalk 09:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC) Thank you for answering my question...
Click to read more »comment 'Fix: I am not the only person coordinating.' Note: I changed the bold in my original contribution to italics. Feel free to comment.--Eptalon (talk)...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC) I don't know if you'd missed the huge bold black thick letters just above your nomination, but the VG article process...
Click to read more »project). Nanochip08 Microchip08 onWHEELS 14:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC) I will now Be Bold and create a draft in my sandbox. -- Da Punk '95 talk 20:16, 8 May 2008...
Click to read more »en:MediaWiki:Gadget-WatchlistChangesBold.css). We can do the same, or continue to the previous as default and have the opposite (no bold) as a gadget. For now, it's...
Click to read more »websites" are not also changing the alphabetical order of the interwiki. Being bold and making the changes is great. That being said, it's also important to...
Click to read more »isn't notable. This is one of those articles that scream for an admin to Be Bold and chose the intent of A4 over the wording... (but yeah, falls under RfD)...
Click to read more »--Peterdownunder (talk) 13:18, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Keep: Once again, WP:BOLD. PGA and this article are all pages that can easily be improved. --Gordonrox24...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:44, 18 August 2010 (UTC) The car manufacturer? If so, you can be bold, and make the article yourself here. :) SimonKSK 17:46, 18 August 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »these templates. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:18, 2 November 2008 (UTC) I'll be bold and create the pages. -- Da Punk '95 talk 19:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Display pages on your watchlist that have changed since your last visit in bold. GoogleTrans: open a translation popup for the selected text or the word...
Click to read more »07:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC) NO ACTION: Thanks all, In regards to being BOLD I shall do just that infuture however I will say that in terms of doing things...
Click to read more »everything within reason I can think of to get support/criticism, I'll just be bold. :) My proposal is at User:Drum guy/General disclaimer (proposal), and all...
Click to read more »creations --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 15:45, 22 April 2020 (UTC) Support. I BOLDly merged the 2 sections, hope all don't mind. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:54...
Click to read more »linked to the item in bold contains the date, which is covered by an external reference In any given week, a main article (in bold) can either occur as...
Click to read more »around to fix it. So, I'll do it tomorrow unless someone else wants to be bold. EhJJTALK 01:23, 12 June 2010 (UTC) Hmm... Then it may be a problem on my...
Click to read more »guide. I'll admit that I don't think there would be any drama over me being bold and ignoring the rules, I've been wrong before on some similar issues. So:...
Click to read more »it is a VGA; Slavery is on there too, it is currenrtly a stub; both are bold, which mean they are more important. Ideas? --Eptalon (talk) 12:12, 14 July...
Click to read more »(like looking at the discussion page) before making large changes, please be bold and try! Any changes you make that are not perfect can be fixed later. We...
Click to read more »of this request for deletion was to Keep. Redirected by nominator. (WP:BOLD) Chenzw Talk 15:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC) African-American Civil Rights...
Click to read more »if it's hard for you to do this, but can I have "Alexhl" in dark blue and bold, please? Hello, I just reorganised the Christian denominations page. As follows:...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) @Chenzw: since nobody seems to object, I'd say go ahead and boldly change it. Etamni | ✉ | ✓ 03:33, 12 September 2016 (UTC) Done I have implemented...
Click to read more »Get Over It. Cheers, Goblin 17:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC) Striking; just be bold and fix it. Goblin 13:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC) But, in a way, it somewhat...
Click to read more »change any other admins actions. It follows the BRD standard of you were Bold to make your move, another admin Reverted you, and now you Discuss. Yes,...
Click to read more »for the rollbacker requirements. WP:RBK: clarify the statement (changes in bold): "You should have made a lot of changes, with experience in anti-vandalism...
Click to read more »now in my user space. So to anyone who wants to help me re-write it: be bold and do so, I can use some help! Mighty Wodan (talk) 17:11, 13 June 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Rand · (talk) 17:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC) Changed the contents slightly. Be Bold, though! Don't wait for others to change it. --Gwib -(talk)- 18:01, 10 August...
Click to read more »Cheers, Razorflame 15:41, 5 February 2009 (UTC) I do have one comment: WP:BOLD - For future reference, he shouldn't need to post his reasons on the talk...
Click to read more »"Not because of their mental state". Anywho, in regards to the problem, Be bold and try to help fix it.--Gordonrox24 (talk) 16:29, 23 June 2009 (UTC) I think...
Click to read more »March 2015 (UTC) ┌─────────────────────────────────┘ OK, I'm going to be bold and merge them. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:39, 30 March 2015 (UTC) Hello, Category:Italian...
Click to read more »similarities to this one. The project however islargely inactive, but be bold and bring it back to life! Cheers, The life of brian (talk) 09:49, 10 October...
Click to read more »capital letters can come across as you shouting, especially when they are bold. Second, there isn't a simple Chinese or Portuguese, I'm guessing that's...
Click to read more »some community feedback. WP:BOLD is about updating pages. Admin actions (especially indef blocks) are not supposed to "be bold", they are supposed to be...
Click to read more »(UTC) Oh, I forgot something else: as much as I understand that we should be bold in making changes, the edits by the editor has raised concern within the...
Click to read more »to me!OMG, What have I done? 22:37, 19 July 2022 (UTC) I'm tempted to be bold and draw a consensus here and make the changes, but a vote would make this...
Click to read more »important to be precise when naming pages, but I prefer to ask here before being bold. A second opinion would be welcome. Yottie =talk= 11:17, 7 September 2012...
Click to read more »should boldly change it to "other websites" (preferably with a bot), and if someone has a good reason for wanting it a different way, they can boldly change...
Click to read more »Auntof6 (talk) All articles need at minimum two of references and a picture Be bold and do not hesitate to create further red links if they are needed Put the...
Click to read more »89.8.162.69 (talk) 02:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC) Firstly, please stop bolding multiple random things in your sentences, it makes your replies quite difficult...
Click to read more »The fifth parameter (alternatively |5=anything) will change both lines to bold text. Any character or text can be used. Named parameter |line=anything forces...
Click to read more »privacy problems. -- Punk Boi 8 07:44, 26 August 2007 (UTC) Well, Ionas was bold today and replaced the Main Page with the new design, which includes a Selected...
Click to read more »this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're...
Click to read more »looking at how often global notices are used nowadays, I'd go by with a "get a bold admin and use it" for a project of this size. -Barras talk 15:00, 15 February...
Click to read more »issues were cleared. Couple corner cases: the |R doesnt seem to clear bold so bolded votes need to be cleaned. And of course, 1400+ other articles with seperate...
Click to read more »could Giggy, but I'm too involved with it so I'm sorry. Someone should be bold enough to realise that this article is worthy of the star and ignore the...
Click to read more »other users is by posting here, which you've already done. Please don't put bold text in the heading -- that kind of formatting in headings causes display...
Click to read more »discussion about what entails a miniumum amount of wikification. (And I am being bold enough to act on, that there arguably is a likelihood, for there being advantages...
Click to read more »matter, and we ought not be inviting those editors back. If I may as be so bold as to offer another solution... Revert, Block, Ignore With regards, Jon@talk:~$...
Click to read more »allowed? Thanks, BG7even 13:34, 20 October 2008 (UTC) Ok, i'm going to Be Bold and publish DYK in about 10 minutes. There appears to be consensus for such...
Click to read more »patroller, what I look for is: properly categorized Page is wikified Page name bolded at beginning of intro important terms linked, even if the links are red...
Click to read more »Thanks!--Piast93 00:07, 19 December 2010 (UTC) In the mean time I'll just be bold and do that. If I'm doing something wrong by doing so please inform me on...
Click to read more »the consideration of guidelines but at the same time respecting both WP:BOLD and WP:IAR. fr33kman t - c 03:49, 20 February 2009 (UTC) OK, I've made a...
Click to read more »standards are the same as en's. If you see something that isn't right then be bold and fix it. -DJSasso (talk) 23:14, 21 December 2011 (UTC) Exactly. I'm not...
Click to read more »17:43, 24 December 2010 (UTC) Not the point. We pay a lot of focus to the bold article in DYK, but it seems we need to pay equal attention to the other...
Click to read more »5 March 2009 (UTC) Per apparent consensus her at the thread and per WP:BOLD I have removed WP:MFD from Wikipedia:RecentChanges. Should something be added...
Click to read more »like it they will remove it and discuss. But, I think this is an area where bold (fresh new editing) could have major benefits, and we can make quick work...
Click to read more »J. B. A. (talk) 16:42, 14 May 2009 (UTC) Ok, on this you can either be BOLD or you have to get consensus by making a section in the discussion. Yotcmdr...
Click to read more »the (UTC) bit at the end to pick out where the sig ends. I do dislike big, bold signatures that jump out at you and ruin the page though, but I don't see...
Click to read more »talk 21:30, 1 May 2009 (UTC) Shall we take them there again...? I've been bold :). Goblin 08:54, 2 May 2009 (UTC) I think it'd be worthwhile. Do it. :)...
Click to read more »issues until now. Furthermore, the community didn't allow it, you were just bold and created it. Now that we have a partial system in the works for creating...
Click to read more »it isn't getting any attention way up the top. If I could, I'd have been bold. But I can't. This is the current text. Microchip • talk 12:33, 6 September...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC) I hope the community doesn't mind but I was bold and went ahead and created {{PW-stub}} as professional wrestling isn't exactly...
Click to read more »Drivers' Champions]]|page=List of all F1 World Champions}} gives: I have been bold and moved it to Template space! Now all we have to do is get them on the...
Click to read more »but surely a fair-use is better than no image at all? Or I might just be bold and upload it... and then upload-war if it gets deleted ;) THE PRECEDING...
Click to read more »2011 (UTC) No-one has opposed this in a week, any chance we can just be bold and unprotect it? Goblin 11:20, 6 April 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Bsadowski1! Just a...
Click to read more »Classical Esther♣ 08:22, 1 March 2010 (UTC) The title could possibly be bolded to be uniform with the rest of the headers, but I'm not sure. The colours...
Click to read more »write in simple English, but they ar easy to find). Other than that: be bold. If we need to tweak our edit filters we will know soon enough. --Eptalon...
Click to read more »March 2018 (UTC) Alas, I fear our imaginative dinoauthor is becoming overly bold unless I am mistaken about Zunityrannus. If he doesn't confess, it looks...
Click to read more »February 2013 (UTC) Auntof6 and others -- Please note that I have added bold to my apology to Racepacket above. I do not suggest that Racepacket shall...
Click to read more »displayed above the box, which looks odd to me. The enwp article has the name bolded and located inside the box. Can someone look at en:Template:Infobox to see...
Click to read more »DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 17:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC) Be bold.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 17:30, 7 August 2022 (UTC) Ok @Gordonrox24. :-) Best...
Click to read more »afford it. I was thinking of that when I tried to fix this by making the text BOLD, but I could not. Ottawahitech (talk) 13:33, 21 July 2019 (UTC) Anyone who...
Click to read more »create it! Others will eventually help and clean it up, but remember: be bold! ~Junedude433talk 20:44, 29 October 2019 (UTC) I'll let you answer that question...
Click to read more »our article quality. Thoughts? -Mh7kJ (talk) 20:22, 5 March 2013 (UTC) Be bold and start. Those who would like to collaborate will and those who do not...
Click to read more »to see the table on the right. There are English language words in bold, "birth", "disappearance", "death", etc. Suppose that for "Pseudonym" someone...
Click to read more »Talk page 14:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC) Delete - Not notable. If abuse of bold text was a valid reason, I would "per that" as well. Pure Evil (talk) 19:50...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete Not a notable earthquake, no sustained coverage. Bold markup in some of the places make me think this might be AI.— *Fehufangą...
Click to read more »achievements but faking a Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine is very bold. Anyway, not notable, no significant coverage. Promotional piece for an non-notable...
Click to read more »about the requested change. Please file requests for language-appropriate "Bold" and "Italic" icons for the styling menu in Phabricator. The design research...
Click to read more »should be wikified to a certain extent. This includes link to other pages, bold and italics text where needed, infobox, pictures etc. The content of the...
Click to read more »a reasonable size, and there have been no delete votes so I am being WP:BOLD and closing. (Non-administrator observation) --Ferien (talk) 16:20, 28 April...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) I would just like to say that I've applied the Wikipedia rule Be bold and decided to change the categories. Cheers, Razorflame 14:46, 22 May 2008...
Click to read more »should self-nominate yourself for adminship. Anyways, we surely need some boldness in this area! Besides, the whole RfA thing is not a big deal either ;)...
Click to read more »both your other changes. Your change at the airport page was good. You put bold on the first mention of the subject of the article. That is our standard...
Click to read more »modules which I am not as familiar with as regular templates, so rather than boldly creating the template here, I thought it best to discuss first. Etamni | ✉ | ✓ ...
Click to read more »02:48, 28 June 2017 (UTC) If you mean the toolbar that has the buttons for bolding, italicizing, signing, etc., then I've been having the same problem off...
Click to read more »I quote "This is a straight vote to be used in determining consensus" (bolding mine) and secondly read m:Voting_is_evil#Polling_discourages_consensus...
Click to read more »Second point Done StevenJ81 (talk) 19:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC) I've boldly added the "talk quotation" template that is used on En-Wiki. It was copied...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Created again after a bold redirect, so I think it should be discussed as to whether this should be...
Click to read more »fix the capitalization on the article. Probably should have just been a WP:BOLD change to the redirect, but this works. Ravensfire (talk) 19:01, 27 January...
Click to read more »listed here? It is clearly covered by QD C2 and as such, I'm doing to be bold for once and recat these pages and tag it for quick deletion. NotImportant...
Click to read more »I don't think that consensus is always implemented. I'm a big fan of WP:BOLD and WP:IAR. However, in those circumstances it was a big change that needed...
Click to read more »in the PDF, which will then be displayed at the head of the book-page. Be bold If you created a nice book, consider to add it to the list of community books...
Click to read more »November 2020 (UTC) Delete While I understand that Interstellarity was being Bold with the redirect, This is going to cause mass confusion, I'm not related...
Click to read more »unequivocally. The only relevant point in the nomination, if I may be so bold, is that he can be 100 per cent trusted with the privacy policy. He could...
Click to read more »can be bold and move the articles/categories yourself – although I should note moving categories is not really something you should do BOLDly due to the...
Click to read more »Resolved. Clearly endorsed. — neuro(talk) 18:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC) Per WP:BOLD I have indef-blocked this account: 0 edits to articles, disrupting RFA with...
Click to read more »(triple means bolded on WP:VA; double means on WP:VA, but not bolded) Homer (triple) (diff) - 3 Checked 3 points Question mark (does this count?) (diff)...
Click to read more »article is about. In the displayed taxobox, this parameter is the one that is bolded. When moving an article to another title, always check to see that the taxon...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. I Decided to be WP:BOLD and fixed it. The defamatory version should probably be hidden. Zaxxon0 (talk)...
Click to read more »to Fiat Ducato at EN and IMHO we should follow that rule here, Could've boldly redirected however as it was created in 2011 I figured a discussion was...
Click to read more »12:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC) I agree EhJJ. In fact I think we should just be bold and go for it and make the page. People will either use it or not. If not...
Click to read more »for the edits --Eptalon (talk) 09:13, 26 January 2014 (UTC) Bold text' PLEASE NOTE:Bold text' I AM GWENDOLYN GOULD, AND I AM SIGNING IN UTILIZING MY...
Click to read more »basic notability, it's just the article needs sources, so Improve it and be BOLD! ionas talk contribs 15:17, 20 August 2007 (UTC) Weak Keep - per Ionas68224...
Click to read more »deletion as far as I'm aware, so there's no reason why we couldn't slightly BOLD/IAR and delete it without the discussion. :) Goblin 10:29, 16 September 2013...
Click to read more »WP:ST? Microchip 17:32, Friday, June 6 2008 Utc Quite right. So I will be bold and move it over. Do not comment here anymore. Chenzw Talk 03:28, 7 June...
Click to read more »to Opel Astra at EN and IMHO we should follow that rule here, Could've boldly redirected however as it was created in 2005 I figured a discussion was...
Click to read more »15 November 2024 (UTC) And ?, It's clearly a notable topic so why not be bold and fix it?.... –Davey2010Talk 23:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »discussion. The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. I decided be bold and delete this under the G10 quick deletion criteria. The article presents...
Click to read more »with potential encourages editors, especially unregistered users, to be bold and improve the article to allow it to evolve over time. Having to re-create...
Click to read more »Frequently they make incorrect ones. Anyone who has been a user, especially a bold one, for some time has probably had at least one legitimate edit of theirs...
Click to read more »contains a leading semicolon, which triggers formatting to become ye-olde bolded semicolon-header-line: TEST99: <== yes, semicolon TEST1: {{#if:{{{4|}}}|{{{4|;}}}...
Click to read more »those users. Archer7 - talk 11:32, 18 September 2007 (UTC) All right, I felt bold enough to nominate two users for CU, on WP:RFA. - Huji reply 14:29, 18 September...
Click to read more »about please? Whether something needs your permission beforehand is up to WP:BOLD, and is otherwise a fairly uncooperative approach to administration. But...
Click to read more »build a better Wikipedia, even if differences in opinion exist. Be kind, be bold, and have fun! Griff (talk) 13:21, 10 February 2022 (UTC) It seems a bit...
Click to read more »that is done, your bot may be given a bot flag by a bureaucrat. // I have bolded the part of interest. Also, GoblinBot was approved as a good idea. Looking...
Click to read more »have it:)). --Peterdownunder (talk) 12:33, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Keep: Be WP:BOLD. This is a subject that has a so many available sources that it will be easy...
Click to read more »asking us to fix whatever mistake they find. Too bad they won't be able to be bold. EhJJTALK 02:55, 6 May 2009 (UTC) I agree that 1 year should be the maximum...
Click to read more »went through the article multiple time cleaning up formatting, random bolding and CAPITALIZATION, excessive referencing, etc. Each time an IP reverted...
Click to read more »Jean song lyrics are restricted for educational and personal use only." [bold type from original] That disclaimer seems to sufficiently cover the copyright...
Click to read more »pointed it out here. Anyone with this page watched got it pointed out in big bold letters at the same time any admin would have been alerted to the problem...
Click to read more »comments? Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 03:11, 4 January 2012 (UTC) Done - WP:BOLD. Goblin 03:29, 4 January 2012 (UTC) I ♥ GoblinBots! Resolved. Page semi-protected...
Click to read more »policy) and the basic fundamental - Be Bold - kicks in. That is something lacking too often. People will not be bold. Pure Evil (talk) 21:16, 24 January...
Click to read more »request Bobherry has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: (WP:BOLD) We don't really need an article of just states and their timezones. They...
Click to read more »12:17, 21 June 2011 (UTC) Merge/Redirect with Russia. In fact: I was WP:BOLD and its now Done Ydennek (talk) 12:47, 21 June 2011 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »article, why is this? --Access Denied The bot picked up your additions of "'''bold text'''" on line 76 as a test edit, and reverted accordingly. It was a false...
Click to read more »just block those who vandalise them. While you're at it, let's go delete WP:BOLD as well, since it obviously doesn't come into people's judgement here. --Gwib...
Click to read more »Housekeeping Since WP:RfD is already backlogged, the quickest way is to be bold and delete the pages and not have to send them to another board for a 7 day...
Click to read more »Gale5050 (talk • contribs) Ok, so because no one else is responding, in bold, I'll put why I think I was helping you guys. Wikipedia can be a contreversal...
Click to read more »[[Category:Xyz]] to [[:Category:Xyz]] would be helpful. I suppose I could just be bold and do it myself, knowing that it could be reverted if the user returns and...
Click to read more »necessary. Thanks! --Rxy (talk) 10:58, 26 March 2018 (UTC) A local block? Bold move...stewards don't usually do that on wikis with active administrators...
Click to read more »explanation for the removal." is incorrect. Perhaps simply referring to WP:Bold and a reminder about WP:Rollback would be useful here, rather than escalating...
Click to read more »lower case from the modern core Latin alphabet. A two-letter combination in bold means that the link links straight to a Wikipedia article (not a disambiguation...
Click to read more »please strike your duplicate keep !vote. You should only make one decision in bold in an RfD. If you change your mind, you should strike it out. --Ferien (talk)...
Click to read more »international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office" -- bolding mine). The article does need references, though, as is required in all...
Click to read more »png') right no-repeat; background-size: auto 100%; font-weight: bold; border: 1px solid #AAA; text-align: left; color: inherit; display: block...
Click to read more »a couple of staff members how to edit, and the fact that you said it in bold, that just drives it home for me. Forget us and the active indian editors...
Click to read more »Substituted {{Reflist}} templates are replaced with the non-substituted version. Bold text is removed from the beginning and end of headlines; this is typically...
Click to read more »this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're...
Click to read more »lists the latest edits in the project. Changes to watched pages appear bold. See Help:Recent changes. Special:RecentChangesLinked (Related changes):...
Click to read more »another warning template. Razorflame 14:33, 24 April 2008 (UTC) I have BOLDly redirected it to Template:Test. Revert me if you disagree. Majorly (talk)...
Click to read more »a merge and redirect the source to the target. This may be accomplished boldly... or discussed on the talk page of the article. Very best, NonvocalScream...
Click to read more »to change! Anyone can change almost any page, and we encourage you to Be bold! Find something that can be improved and make it better. Maybe you know something...
Click to read more »what you want to happen with the article by having a single template or bold writing. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »normal language is the typical free-flowing text that allows triple-quote '''bold-font''', along with the HTML tags, such as <ref>...</ref>. There is a second...
Click to read more »have done. Dreamafter ⇔ 04:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC) This is how you mark bold text - Nothing to say really; user deserves the tools. --Eptalon 15:14, 2...
Click to read more »notable movies, television shows, stage performances, or other productions., bolding mine. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 15:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC) Sanika Amit...
Click to read more »looks different from Crohn`s disease. We notice. Wikipedia has a motto: be bold. This means learn by doing. Sometimes, however, it's good to take baby steps...
Click to read more »community discussion. Although, generally speaking, I'm a big advocate of being bold and getting on with it, I have concerns that Osiris (and I mean no disrespect...
Click to read more »covered en masse in various high-profile sources. According to Wikipedia:Be_bold, anyone can add more references, expand an article or so if sees a bias toward...
Click to read more »new user.--I think we really should let some new users speak first (and be bold and say which of the two templates, seems more simple or feels more simple...
Click to read more »arse, stupid, hello, homosexual score-words(200): crackhead, bieber, porn, bold text, italic text, crap, p3n1s, omg, lmao, rofl, blabla score-words(800):...
Click to read more »delete the first letter. For example, if the word "Alice" is a link or is in bold, and want to replace it with "Bob", I need to type "B" like this "ABlice"...
Click to read more »I almost always discuss my change on the talk page before I make any significant updates. Possibly in the future I will learn to be a little bolder :)...
Click to read more »{{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}." (bold mine)-DJSasso (talk) 00:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC) Keep per DJSasso. Lithorien...
Click to read more »1. Welcome 2. Formatting text 3. Linking other pages 4. Talk pages 5. Important things 6. Be bold 7. You are done...
Click to read more »1. Welcome 2. Formatting text 3. Linking other pages 4. Talk pages 5. Important things 6. Be bold 7. You are done...
Click to read more »withdrawing this nomination. PotsdamLamb (talk) 08:27, 24 May 2021 (UTC) I've boldly closed this as keep as you withdrew the nomination. --Ferien (talk) 18:14...
Click to read more »1. Welcome 2. Formatting text 3. Linking other pages 4. Talk pages 5. Important things 6. Be bold 7. You are done...
Click to read more »1. Welcome 2. Formatting text 3. Linking other pages 4. Talk pages 5. Important things 6. Be bold 7. You are done...
Click to read more »conflict, I will always remember to keep a cool head, stay civil, and be bold. Thanks, RyanCross (talk) 03:39, 28 June 2008 (UTC) I cannot see any problems...
Click to read more »ImprovedWikiImprovement has nominated Naleksuh for adminship, I decided to be Bold and file my Request for Adminship. What I intend to do/Why I want to run...
Click to read more »(talk) 05:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC) I kinda Support this comment, why not be bold and create stubs? However, only kinda because it may get deleted per a discussion...
Click to read more »unencyclopedic sentence: "Chan's innovative approach to business, coupled with his bold risk-taking and vision, has established him as a significant figure in the...
Click to read more »[https://www.legit.ng/1428463-young-man-becomes-ceo-4-companies-after-making-bold-move-start-his-own-business.html Legit.ng] These sources are editorially...
Click to read more »Auntof6 (below). Etamni | ✉ | ✓ 15:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC) Comment: I've boldly placed a redirect on the page (RfD tag not removed). The page can still...
Click to read more »was discussed to make this change so A3 looks like it was changed by being bold and just got accepted as such. 70.184.168.201 (talk) 05:52, 21 December 2011...
Click to read more »month and these are almost entirely reverts with the occasional tag or bolded title tossed in. He spends no time creating an encyclopedia, the thing we...
Click to read more »sentence in the first paragraph of en:WP:SPORTS which is highlighted in bold: The article must provide reliable sources showing that the subject meets...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) MrMeAndMrMe, I have struck your keep !vote, you might want to bold your "delete" to make it clearer to the closing admin about which action...
Click to read more »sentence in the first paragraph of en:WP:SPORTS which is highlighted in bold: The article must provide reliable sources showing that the subject meets...
Click to read more »· logs · delete) Vote possible until September 15, 2007 I'd like to stay bold and nominate this article as a candidate for a VGA strap. It meets most of...
Click to read more »that to the template's creator and he'll think about adding it, or just be bold and add it your self.-- † CM16 18:49, 26 March 2009 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »is complete vandalism. Both are valid quick deletion justification if "Be Bold", IAR and "because its the right thing to do" is not acceptable to an admin...
Click to read more »And I mean every one line stub. Or go expand the notable ones. Or just be bold. I really don't care. Goblin 15:00, 22 June 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Kennedy! Keep...
Click to read more »ones, enjoy it while it lasts. I would suggest staying away from making bold, hard decisions, as you will end up being punished for them. -- Netoholic...
Click to read more »oversighters (with limited hours of availability), and I figured that I would be bold and see if y'all would want me to help out as an oversighter. Apparently...
Click to read more »But this isn't about religion, or history of religion. I bet you can be bold and make this article keepable, probably in less than ten edits. --Eptalon...
Click to read more »for deletion/Requests/2013/Bob Kirk Requests for deletion/Requests/2013/Bold Requests for deletion/Requests/2013/Boogey ball Requests for deletion/Requests/2013/Boruch...
Click to read more »contributions. None of these are bad, but I would like to see some more bold changes to policies and guidelines and I would also like to see some work...
Click to read more »deletion/Requests/2014/Bloom filter Requests for deletion/Requests/2014/Boldness Requests for deletion/Requests/2014/Bookcase Requests for deletion/Requests/2014/Brandon...
Click to read more »is used as a reason for deletion, I ignore it and coming in to say so in bold writing is (in my mind) inappropriate. I know that all the articles (simple...
Click to read more »error_001_prio_script=-1 END error_001_head_script=No bold title END error_001_desc_script=This article has no bold title like '''Title'''. END error_001_prio_simplewiki=0...
Click to read more »the album in this Wikipedia, neither about the singer, doesn't matter, be bold. The single its also known by its lyrics as a "protest song" against Spanish...
Click to read more »from regular cells, depending on the browser. They are often rendered in a bold font and centered. {| |+ The table's caption ! scope="col" | Column heading...
Click to read more »revised into prose. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:34, 4 October 2009 (UTC) I've boldly deleted that section which was full of original research. Even the refs...
Click to read more »only info on the page during the QD and the start of this RfD aside from a bold text and a reference to Ja.wikipedia - as about an actress/singer who was...
Click to read more »should be sufficient. Kansan (talk) 03:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC) I will be bold and do some merging, if you don't mind. --SEPTActaMTA8235 (talk) 16:00, 5...
Click to read more »new clock, or does the three weeks start from 23 days ago? I'm going to be bold myself and say probably a new clock. Purplebackpack89 (talk) 00:42, 30 August...
Click to read more »''''Bold text'''[[Media:Example.mp3]]== Headline text =={{delete}}') 05:27, 23 Nov 2004 Netoholic deleted "Student" (content was: '{{delete}}'''Bold text'''''Italic...
Click to read more »en.wiki and you will find many is the account that is lost forever after bold editing. Applying for a job is hardly a bad sign. Razorflame adds articles...
Click to read more »their articles have problems however problems that can be fixed). Why not BE BOLD and FIX IT?. –Davey2010Talk 22:21, 23 February 2025 (UTC) If you want to...
Click to read more »Keep While it certainly needs a heavy clean up (someone loves them some bold...) , the topic is highly notable and the subject of untold number of books...
Click to read more »violate any core content policies. As the Main Page also reminds us: "Be bold! Your article does not have to be perfect, because other editors will fix...
Click to read more »not indented, and put your choice (keep, delete, redirect, merge, etc.) in bold at the beginning. That will be a big help for the closing admin. Thanks....
Click to read more »notable movies, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. (bolding mine). If she only has important roles in two prominent shows in my mind...
Click to read more »voted support look over the criteria again. (You may also want to read the bolded section in the intro of this page.) Articles must meet all criteria or it...
Click to read more »giving a bad example of admin (or even regular editor) behavior. I stated (bold in the original): "there's no reason to restore 5 year old pro-Nazi conspiracy...
Click to read more »article was in a better condition so that's why I went ahead and acting boldly. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:50, 27 June 2008 (UTC) On the contrary, Spurgeon...
Click to read more »using sock puppets" and "IP addresses" will not be counted." Here, the 2 bold groups are 2 separate entities. Hope everyone understand the sentence properly...
Click to read more »was no consensus to do so so you would be putting yourself out there on WP:BOLD. Now, this is my userspace we're talking about. Not Template space. Either...
Click to read more »removed if you don't take the process seriously and vote without reason (see bolded section above). Seeing as how you have provided no valid reason to oppose...
Click to read more »I want to simply write the word support without using the picture or the bold.... then I would have to go back and turn the gadget off to do that... which...
Click to read more »bit of cleanup on the article, particularly removing a lot of unnecessary bold text and Facebook links. Facebook links hold zero encyclopedic value. I'd...
Click to read more »the author blanks the page, this can mean that they want it deleted" The bolding there is mine and highlights the parts of G7 that I think do not apply...
Click to read more »German. Formatting of Books section needs to be consistent - some odd bolding going on. Move sisterlinks template up to the books section to prevent...
Click to read more »article. As the fifth point of "About Simple English Wikipedia" ,i.e., "Be Bold", says not to try to write complete professional article by myself, so, this...
Click to read more »doesn't match the actual volume number is fishy to say the least. Source 6 is bold enough to include a DOI to a... different article! Great! Unusable. Source...
Click to read more »as Tropical Storm Ingrid. The name should be bolded. -- Creol(talk) 07:47, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Bolded and linked. I gave the prose another pass over...
Click to read more »acceptable. The equivalent of using bold. -DJSasso (talk) 13:11, 21 November 2011 (UTC) Maybe even over emphasising. Using bold, I agree is to emphasise things...
Click to read more »(UTC) May I point in you in the direction of Malinaccier's nomination, in bold, at the top of this page for why that argument doesn't really work. Perhaps...
Click to read more »11 November 2021 (UTC) The keyword you are missing to notice (or write in bold, in your case) is important/significant coverage, which in Wiki-language...
Click to read more »at the top of the article needs to go, since there's WP:NOARTICLE. Only bold the title of the article once. Technically, you're supposed to include it...
Click to read more »request Illusion Flame has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Boldly nominating a very old template for deletion here. We should’nt ever really...
Click to read more »misunderstood with article. Bolding words in the middle of sentences makes it very hard for people to read. Previous bolding are already causing quite a...
Click to read more »to imply that the admin was acting in bad faith. I think that is a very bold claim, but is not the case here. I simply thought that the consensus in this...
Click to read more »July 2025 (UTC) A7 says recommended for deletion by at least two editors (bolding mine). That is quite different from other QDs, the passing admin isn't...
Click to read more »(UTC) Avoid # meaning number, replace it with Track no. or something. "Axis: Bold as Love [28]" avoid references on section headings. Fixed. NotImportant 18:19...
Click to read more »is "In Film & Television" under a third header? Why are the actor names bolded? Also, in ref 15, the accessdate is linked as a whole, while in the other...
Click to read more »July 2009 (UTC) Then the closing admin doesn't need the templates or the bold words do they? ;) fr33kman talk 20:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC) After reading the...
Click to read more »wiki-relations: "Whenever you're not sure if what you're saying is fine, don't be bold". At least, that's something I try to adhere to. So, just one more thing:...
Click to read more »Closed per Not Promoted: Note, this is purely procedural as I am making a bold change and removing the votes. Goblin 23:02, 29 August 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Yotty...
Click to read more »entered the top 10 in the music charts. "Let go" should be italicized, not bolded. Also, link needed for "music charts". There are many different music charts...
Click to read more »for short edits which contain nothing other than a trip-phrase (such as '''Bold Text'''). Will not revert the same article twice in a day in case of false...
Click to read more »through a RfD! Creating a stub sub-type like this is perfectly within "be bold". If there was disagreement, it could go to the template talk page, user...
Click to read more »the article may still have a few issues to deal with. Nevertheless I am bold and list it here.--Eptalon (talk) 14:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC) I have separated...
Click to read more »1. Welcome 2. Formatting text 3. Linking other pages 4. Talk pages 5. Important things 6. Be bold 7. You are done...
Click to read more »reliable? Why are you linking to the company's own website in link 5 when you boldly stated independent coverage and notability? Find an external observer that...
Click to read more »be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD. (bolding mine) addresses pretty much all your first point. Yes, complete nonsense...
Click to read more »non-trivial reporting. •Daily Tribune: Behind the Spell: Emille Joson's bold casting in 'Adivino' These three sources are used in support of more in-depth...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) @Steven1991: I do not think that you were blunt. We are told 'Be bold!' here. So, your way of talking straight is good. I know you may not change...
Click to read more »the wiki. This would in no way stop voting As people would still vote with Bold text. In addition, the templates exist at English Wikipedia, so there's a...
Click to read more »working now. Osiris (talk) 01:18, 18 June 2012 (UTC) Oops! I made the type bold so I could see it! I didn't know it meant I was yelling. Oregonian2012 (talk)...
Click to read more »behavioral pattern. If this happened once or twice, it might be excused as bold editing. If this happened dozens of times over an extended period, it is...
Click to read more »access, stewards are authorized to grant exceptions to the above criteria. (bolding mine) If DWI was to send me (or another user with access) every temporary...
Click to read more »anniversaries but that wouldn't be encyclopedically useful at all. Feel free to boldly remove them. Cheers, Sophocrat (talk) 01:50, 13 June 2025 (UTC) I have gone...
Click to read more »edits. :] Papercutbiology♫ (talk)) 15:32, 27 March 2009 (UTC) Go ahead, be bold! The Rambling Man (talk) 15:42, 27 March 2009 (UTC) Comment Haha, okay. :)...
Click to read more »of the wiki, as I am not sure I could reasonably apply the spirit of WP:BOLD or WP:IAR to close otherwise. The article is in a good shape and, while there...
Click to read more »Award may be given to new editors who show great enthusiasm, skill, and boldness beyond their experience. This award was introduced by ClockworkSoul on...
Click to read more »discussion, or action on any consensus, such as it is, at the stub project. As WP:BOLD says, "If you see something that can be improved, do it yourself." That is...
Click to read more »I've removed the bolding but have instead bolded the Golf name in each section and have left those that are called different names in bold and I've fixed...
Click to read more »companies, products, services or websites that do not claim to be notable. (bolding mine). There is a difference between articles on non-notable topics and...
Click to read more »discussions—especially on the Simple Talk page. The candidate should also show boldness (please don't misunderstand me; I don't mean it negatively) in making certain...
Click to read more »2024 (UTC) Be bold. My edit of today, has edit-remark "See discussion at Simple Talk | Revert Good-faith edit | Undid revision ...".--Bold reading might...
Click to read more »politicians. Grandmaster Shifuji Shaurya Bhardwaj is well known for his bold and courageous statements against this entire lobby, and that was the reason...
Click to read more »Actually, not long ago, I dealt with this article. Here, I was told to be more bold and QD instead of RfD. I think that played with my mind a bit. Anyways, no...
Click to read more »politically 3603 intensity 3604 exam 3605 fragment 3606 feminist 3607 deer 3608 bold 3609 strict 3610 literary 3611 devote 3612 delicious 3613 written 3614 scandal...
Click to read more »(talk | contribs) 02:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC) It's a work in progress so be bold and add anything that makes sense to you. :) fr33kman 02:55, 27 October 2025...
Click to read more »a lack of bias then I've closed articles I've voted in lots of times. WP:BOLD fr33kman 22:57, 18 August 2023 (UTC) Occasionally, I will close RfDs I have...
Click to read more »yes, that English has many different varieties is certainly a plus. So, be bold, and create articles. If they aren't perfect, other editors will fix them...
Click to read more »pictures of conservative figures that Chuck had organized. Too much? See WP:BOLD! Gotanda (talk) 01:22, 19 December 2010 (UTC) I think that you removed too...
Click to read more »frustrated about the article getting deleted, but please stop shouting with bolded text. Thanks. With that, I've said all I think I have to say here. -- Auntof6...
Click to read more »honored if you could serve as a participant for this event. Drop a message boldly if you have any questions! :-) HAOREIMA (Khurumjari) 16:45, 6 February 2026...
Click to read more »bit easier to manage the discussion. There is now an IP editor making some bold changes, but those are mostly different from this demotion request. Briefly...
Click to read more »work. If we were to have the same facts as enwiki's today, only 2 of the bold articles in the facts out of 5 exist here. It appears it would be a little...
Click to read more »@TitanicGlitter: For future reference, you can fix things like that yourself! Be bold and fix things you find that need fixing. -- Auntof6 (talk) 16:30, 20 June...
Click to read more »(UTC) Yeah, we've changed the rules regarding anonymous editors and RfD. Be bold and fix the problem yourself. Regards fr33kman 23:55, 18 May 2025 (UTC) Is...
Click to read more »format instead of MDY they are using DMY. Bolding in numerous articles where it is not needed. Namily bolding titles of movies, books, etc. that are already...
Click to read more »don’t link back to the article within the article. I also removed the bolding and simplified it a little more as well as rephrasing a sentence. Otherwise...
Click to read more »(title-Title of respect) (modern- Modern Shandong province) Description: Bold text Liroy69420 (talk) 01:11, 9 September 2022 (UTC) @Liroy69420: Confirmed...
Click to read more »68% of Metro Transit's passengers were from busses. - from busses? You've bolded Minnesota State Legislature, but the article isn't about them. The former...
Click to read more »to consume medicine by a registered doctor ? Take any one. Okay no one is bold here except me so I am giving Alprazolam. Drug formula is same packaging...
Click to read more »however this did not need administrator action. In the future, you can be bold and update the article yourself. If it is a major change, please bring it...
Click to read more »like protection of "highly visible templates". I don't think Wikipedia:Be bold applies to changing policies. Kk.urban (talk) 19:39, 3 November 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »anything on my talk page. Any violations will be reported to WP:AN." in bold letters clear across any typing area of my page. I am holding to it. Admins...
Click to read more »(UTC) GROKR Exchangé, promotional?--In regard to hoaxy or weak sources for 'bold claim', someone else can suggest that. Note: "22:37, 24 March 2025 ... deleted...
Click to read more »is copying enWP without citing sources, and on top of that, they're using bold text throughout the page. His messages here and here are downright insulting...
Click to read more »diffs or something, list them in the discussion section. I wanted to be bold, but I think this is best left to the administrators to decide. I know we...
Click to read more »article, cause the formatting was all over the place. For reference, we don't bold terms in the body of an article for no reason. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)...
Click to read more »single word, and/or misspelling of a word.--Everyone can choose when to BeBold. That including users who have cleaned up the lede.--Note to self: Try not...
Click to read more »a big fan of promotional text and we do our best to combat it, Please be bold and fix the articles]], Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 16:29, 15 March 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(season 2) and The Simpsons (season 1) are not linked and just as unlinked bold text), I've not updated the other modules connected to Template:Infobox television...
Click to read more »and do the split. Of course, at that point, you can invoke en:Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, which is essentially what you're doing, just pre-emptively...
Click to read more »formatted incorrectly - e.g. headings are marked correctly (== ==), but bold is marked with ** (which is also typical of AI). Such an article is then...
Click to read more »make a well made main page that goes beyond a simple idea such as to Be Bold. MrMeAndMrMeTalk 14:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC) 2MASS J04285096-2253227 is a red-link...
Click to read more »--Solution, revert to the version 'at the start of the diff'. (I tried to be bold, but a filter stopped my edit from going thru.) 2001:2020:31D:B98F:296B:B9E:7506:8672...
Click to read more »one of two things, get the requests for deletion process underway, or be bold and redirect these pages back to artist in question. Lee Vilenski (talk •...
Click to read more »keeping it as it is. I also realised after starting this that per the idea of bold revert discuss, it wasn't even necessary to send this to ST. --Ferien (talk)...
Click to read more »bathwater, and this wikipedia is for grades 7 to 9, not for pre-teens. (I put in bold the parts i want to discuss) 88.110.38.249 (talk) 14:37, 5 September 2023...
Click to read more »commentary of the work, product or service for which it serves as poster art. (bolding mine). I find it extremely difficult to say our local article, Furiosa...
Click to read more »option left available to solve the problem of vandalism of the page. (bolding mine) In this case, it is clearly not the only option left available to...
Click to read more »fixed some small formatting issues - a period at the end of a sentence was bolded with the alternate name, and there was a reference before punctuation (references...
Click to read more »used to tag pages with G5. --IWI (talk) 14:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC) I've boldly moved Category:Japanese video game companies to Category:Video game companies...
Click to read more »some edits to it: Definite and indefinite articles should not normally be bolded as part of the article's lead. Avoid repeating a link, especially when they...
Click to read more »redirect will be best here or if we wanna cut the red tape, just someone BOLDly creating a redirect will do. But on the record this isn't a G2 at the very...
Click to read more »blocked for other reasons... Eptalon (talk) 16:18, 15 October 2023 (UTC) BoldManGold (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block...
Click to read more »