Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following one or more categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
about a living person) must be made with the greatest care and attention to proof, neutrality, and avoiding original research. Shortcut WP:BLPWP:BLP...
Click to read more »persons" (WP:BLP) states that material should be improved/mended and fixed first, rather than delete an article page quickly, to correct BLP-issues. The...
Click to read more »of this request for deletion was to Keep. This is ridiculous. Template:Blp (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) The one and only...
Click to read more »the reason: No notability. BLP biographical article does not give any references or sources. Article has been tagged as a BLP no source article since April...
Click to read more »July 2022 (UTC) Template:BLP IMDb refimprove (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request Template:BLP IMDb refimprove/doc (edit...
Click to read more »Wekeepwhatwekill has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:BLP as it has no references whatsoever and makes claims that cannot be confirmed...
Click to read more »not meeting BLP requirements, or not. For me, this is a not-proven-noteworthy player in a noteworthy league, and also does not meet BLP requirements...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Potential violation of the BLP policy as the article has had inadequate sources since 2011 Wyn Wyl (talk)...
Click to read more »COI for voting, but tbh this is a problem page/negative-BLP and my opinions on negative BLP is that they should go fast Goblin 22:45, 8 January 2010...
Click to read more »not meeting BLP requirements, or not. For me, this is a not-proven-noteworthy player in a noteworthy league, and also does not meet BLP requirements...
Click to read more »citations and does not require them to be shown. This is also an unsourced BLP. In looking, there is not a clear indication there are several reliable source...
Click to read more »number in what looks like Finnish. So this is a BLP. It has no sources, and that's critical for a BLP, and it means the notability is not supported by...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced actor/singer/YouTuber BLP. Web search results just show social media accounts. Details of discography/filmography...
Click to read more »challenge all the zero reference blp articles we have here, and mark some of them for notability issues with no references for blp articles? ciao!!! Carriearchdale...
Click to read more »why a section should be deleted. WP:BLP - Text should be preserved, as much as possible, according to WP policy WP:BLP. Within the section WP:Editing policy#Try...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: An unreferenced BLP about someone who's seven years underage. Consider this a BLP PROD; the nomination will be immediately withdrawn...
Click to read more »the fact that it had no sources, made it a very flagrant violation of the BLP policies.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 02:38, 30 August 2023 (UTC) Lovely Peaches...
Click to read more »to that website that the website posted without checking the accuracy Such spoilers could be crystal balling, or be a violation of the WP:BLP policy....
Click to read more »FatalFit has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced BLP, WP:BLP Dylan | ✉ | ✓ 19:29, 20 May 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »[Create=Require administrator access] (indefinite) (Recently deleted BLP: PRODded BLP of minor that has had content hidden before; best keep from recreation...
Click to read more »involved in it. The worst things are of course the ever growing vandalism and BLP issues. Yes, I agree with you. Is there anything particular you would like...
Click to read more »for the reason: Notability. No independent reliable, published sources (BLP); use of failed and/or peacock sources. Rus793 (talk) 14:09, 23 May 2014...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Notability (music). The single source citation is from his publicist/promoter; a BLP with no reliable sources. Rus793 (talk) 21:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »request Osiris has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced BLP since 2009. No evidence of notability and no significant coverage available...
Click to read more »familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines (especially Wikipedia:BLP, Wikipedia:Copyright, Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Notability)....
Click to read more »Does not meet BLP requirements. No notability has been demonstrated. Article was tagged 2 1/2 years ago for no sources or references. WP:BLP should trump...
Click to read more »Does not meet BLP requirements. No notability has been demonstrated. Article was tagged 2 1/2 years ago for no sources or references. WP:BLP should trump...
Click to read more »Does not meet BLP requirements. No notability has been demonstrated. Article was tagged 2 1/2 years ago for no sources or references. WP:BLP should trump...
Click to read more »Does not meet BLP requirements. No notability has been demonstrated. Article was tagged 2 1/2 years ago for no sources or references. WP:BLP should trump...
Click to read more »and freedom has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced BLP with controversial claims and no proof of notability Lights and freedom (talk)...
Click to read more »Does not meet BLP requirements. No notability has been demonstrated. Article was tagged 2 1/2 years ago for no sources or references. WP:BLP should trump...
Click to read more »ChecKemzV has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced BLP. It may even be a hoax as this turns up nothing very reliable The Checker...
Click to read more »this request for deletion was to Delete. essentially a negative unsourced BLP fr33kman 17:38, 15 December 2011 (UTC) Wendy Scurr (edit · talk · history...
Click to read more »revolves around allegations against an individual (Mahendra Amin) and violates BLP Policy. The article is unclear. Zjui3r (talk) 15:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »GNG,according to the nominator. But I have read Notability Guidelines on BLP. And one of the main criteria is nomination/reward for a notable award/recognition...
Click to read more »for deletion/Requests/2025/List of Chinese dissidents. These are potential BLP violations as the main editor of this article is deciding whether or not...
Click to read more »DJSasso re:BLP vio. -- Deborahjay (talk) 20:07, 15 November 2017 (UTC) Comment to those mentioning BLP vio: This category is not limited to BLPs. Even so...
Click to read more »person with no sources, so this page should be deleted because it fails WP:BLP. Arthurfan828 (talk) 00:29, 14 February 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »to Delete. I've quick-deleted this as vandalism. It contained obvious BLP violations. Osiris (talk) 09:35, 9 December 2012 (UTC) Super Bowl XLVII (edit...
Click to read more »07:10, 19 February 2026 (UTC) Subject: Request for direct help posting a BLP triage request on zh-yuewiki (I am blocked, user talk also restricted) Dear...
Click to read more »(UTC) I just noticed an article which I think is doubtful according to the BLP: Biographies of Living People policy. The jetsetter Charlotte Lindström sits...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Animator BLP without citations to the works section. Web search results just show primary...
Click to read more »of BLPs that are totally devoid of sources. Osiris (talk) 04:20, 21 September 2012 (UTC) Actually no, nowhere in the policy states that creating BLP articles...
Click to read more »for the reason: This template is duplicated by {{BLP unsourced}}. There are many aspects of WP:BLP, all of which have their own template message boxes...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Musician BLP with unsourced discography, originally copied from https://en.wikipedia...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP missing references and few discography to show notability. MathXplore (talk)...
Click to read more »Actually BLP applies even in userspace, except as it applies to the user himself/herself. See enwiki version of policy. Therefore, QD for BLP violation...
Click to read more »for deletion was to Delete. QD by Macdonald-ross, as negative unsourced BLP/attack page; independent of that deletion, I don't know of many notable elementary...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP without sources to show notability. MathXplore (talk) 11:20, 19 February...
Click to read more »Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced BLP Rathfelder (talk) 07:50, 16 May 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP with no references Rathfelder (talk) 10:07, 22 May 2023 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This musician BLP heavily depends on primary sources, discography is poorly sourced. Web search...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Actor BLP missing recent works and other activism, filmography is unsourced. Web search...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to be OR. Is a complex BLP with no reliable sources. Rus793 (talk) 13:06, 21 July 2014 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »close request Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP which reads more like a resume to me. The refrences are neither significant...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Musician BLP with unsourced discography, missing attribution from everybody wiki. Web...
Click to read more »Purplebackpack89 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced BLP that is an exact copy of an English article that is no better Please discuss...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Delete Unsourced BLP. Minorax (talk) 13:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC) Unsourced BLP is not a reason for deletion. This article fails...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Same kind of BLP like Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Diana Ditan, no references...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP without references to show notability, looks similar to https://en.wikipedia...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: YouTuber BLP missing recent works since 2020. Given references are primary sources or...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Businessperson BLP heavily depending on primary sources. Searching pages by real name just shows...
Click to read more »request Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP with no references. Rathfelder (talk) 07:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »request Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP with no references. Rathfelder (talk) 07:56, 5 July 2023 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »request Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP with no references. Rathfelder (talk) 07:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Does not show notability; unsourced BLP Rus793 (talk) 17:01, 16 August 2016 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This BLP claims notability but no inline citations to the filmography, missing recent...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Businessperson BLP strongly depending on primary sources and passing mentions, see also https://en...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Actor BLP lacking attribution from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jen_Gardiner...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Voice actor BLP with an unsourced filmography copied from enwiki. The references at the enwiki...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Singer BLP without enough references. The early life section is unsourced, and the filmography...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Businessperson BLP with some awards but no footnotes/references. Web search by name shows others...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Content creator BLP missing further details about discography/filmography. All given references...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional and unreferenced BLP. Rathfelder (talk) 13:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced BLP Rathfelder (talk) 21:48, 14 May 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Poorly sourced musician BLP. Web search results by stage name (nickname) are mostly primary sources....
Click to read more »Osiris has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced BLP, with nothing readily available to source it with. There is nothing significant...
Click to read more »famous Nollywood actor. Has significant roles in local movies. Meets basic BLP guidelines. --165.155.168.154 (talk) 18:28, 25 October 2021 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced autobiographical BLP, with no attempt to wikify or write in simple language. Likely copied from...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Negative unsourced BLP... also, seems unnotable on it's face. Please discuss this deletion below...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cricket umpire BLP that may not meet WP:GNG. Most of the given references are just passing mentions...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This BLP claims notability but the awards section is unsourced, discography is poorly...
Click to read more »RiggedMint has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable BLP. Seems to be a little non-neutral too? RiggedMint 15:12, 29 August 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP unreferenced and notability disputed. MathXplore (talk) 11:06, 17 February...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP without references to show notability, article copy pasted from here. MathXplore...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This casting director BLP seems to be different from Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/Shubham...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Criminal BLP just for a single event and may not meet WP:CRIME, no references given to...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: COI, reads like a fansite, and unsourced BLP for months. — Jeff G. ツ 08:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Mathematician BLP without description of academic works, no further details about what he did...
Click to read more »many people with the same name and hard to find reliable sources for this BLP. In addition, using full name as query does not work. No relation found with...
Click to read more »close request Valereee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP article deleted on enwiki for lack of notability. Valereee (talk) 12:27,...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP without references to show notability. Page log at ENWP https://en.wikipedia...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: This article simply has no sources and is a WP:BLP, there's no evidence to support claims or establish notability. N1TH Music...
Click to read more »self-nomination. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:37, 25 April 2018 (UTC) Delete BLP article with no references. --Joefromrandb 20:45, 25 April 2018 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Businessperson BLP with advertisement tense and inappropriate inline citations. The page depends...
Click to read more »Cyber.Eyes.2005 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This BLP page has been deleted multiple times for advertising. While the tone seems...
Click to read more »subject, but this is a w:WP:TNT situation. Too much unbalanced coverage for a BLP and doesn't look like it's salvageable with its current history. CountryANDWestern...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Nonnotable sportsplayer Unsourced BLP. Bobherry Talk My Changes 23:49, 13 September 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »request Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP with no references Rathfelder (talk) 21:06, 5 July 2023 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced scientist/actor BLP missing filmography or further details about any other works. Cannot find...
Click to read more »limit on how long tags can stay on articles. This is not a sourceless WP:BLP. Fylbecatulous talk 18:47, 14 November 2015 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Actor BLP removed from EN per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for...
Click to read more »- 1. There are only 3 references which there must be more sources per WP:BLP. 2. This page was deleted on The English Wikipedia multiple times. 3. Poor...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC) Delete sources are not reliable, fails WP:BLP DIVINE 00:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC) Delete Looks like your typical spam article...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI generated unsourced BLP. There is an en version, but I think a fresh start after deletion might be...
Click to read more »Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced BLP Rathfelder (talk) 21:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »wholly unsourced and mildly promotional. Just a question, do we have any BLP PROD-like system here? JavaHurricane (talk) 09:48, 22 May 2020 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP with no references to show notability. MathXplore (talk) 07:47, 10 February...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Actor BLP without any references. Web search results just show IMDB, Fandoms, social...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cricket umpire BLP that may not meet WP:GNG. Most of the given references are just passing mentions...
Click to read more »Hulged has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced BLP. Non notable. Couldn't find any sources that support the claims in the article...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP without references, notability questioned. MathXplore (talk) 05:20, 5 February...
Click to read more »for the reason: Created this article last year when I didn't understand BLP too well. Not a notable person. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 02:05, 10 January...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Actor BLP without any references and may not meet WP:NACTOR. Recently deleted at ENWP...
Click to read more »claim of notability, but no further details about business. It is also a BLP missing attribution from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ahmad_Moukalled...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Lack of notability. BLP with no source citations Rus793 (talk) 21:01, 20 November 2013 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to be a non-notable BLP. Some sources dont work, and some seem to be promoting the person, instead...
Click to read more »that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. BLP with no references. Rathfelder (talk) 22:21, 21 April 2023 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Actor BLP with very short filmography and may not meet WP:NACTOR. Most of the web search...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Actor & model BLP without recent (2020-22) filmography. The career section does not have enough...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Author and subject are the same person; BLP with no source citations. Rus793 (talk) 19:33, 27 September 2013 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP of politician but the article tells nothing about activism or related works...
Click to read more »Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced BLP for 12 years. Rathfelder (talk) 22:40, 14 November 2023 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article is an unsourceD WP:BLP which is structured terribly. There are no corresponding articles in any...
Click to read more »independent reliable sources mention this person. Fails WP:GNG, WP:V, and WP:BLP; claims are unverifiable and appear to be misattributed to other student...
Click to read more »Osiris has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: An unreferenced BLP, with very little indication as to the subject's notability. An IMDB link...
Click to read more »2015 (UTC) Delete as not notable. And, sources are especially important for BLP. Macdonald-ross (talk) 20:42, 6 January 2015 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »should not be a stand-alone article about this person. That's contrary to WP:BLP. Ravensfire (talk) 15:41, 19 May 2026 (UTC) Endorse deletion - Reads like...
Click to read more »MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: unsourced blp MrMeAndMrMeTalk 18:49, 19 April 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »Most of it is almost incomprehensible. It has been left as an unreferenced BLP for over a month now, and there are quite a few controversial statements...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I'm primarily nominating this BLP for notability and sourcing concerns, which can be seen by reading through...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This actor BLP claims notability but the whole discography is unsourced. There seems to...
Click to read more »close request BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP but may not meet notability guidelines here. Most of the part has no claims...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. Has a history of QD on enwiki as (a) self-promotion and (b) BLP violation. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:24, 16 October 2017 (UTC) This request is...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP copied from declined draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:OGB_Recent...
Click to read more »Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced BLP Rathfelder (talk) 22:11, 14 May 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »this case, we do not have any good reliable sources to use and this is a BLP, so I would rather keep this deleted until a sourced and accurate stub can...
Click to read more »is really what you want. Should probably be deleted in the interest of WP:BLP, and that the other sources don't claim notability. Lights and freedom (talk)...
Click to read more »close request Jeff G. has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP with no verifiable reliable sources. Claims to have won a Saturn award, so...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Deletion repeated YouTuber BLP from EN ([1], [2]) without any sources. Web search results just lead to fandoms...
Click to read more »–Davey2010Talk 20:45, 4 December 2017 (UTC) Delete. – Both of these are BLP vios, too, I think. (Gives ages of minors without sources.) StevenJ81 (talk)...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Business person BLP that seems to be a recreation of a deleted article at ENWP, see https://en...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Poorly sourced singer-songwriter BLP. All given sources seem to be primary sources, most part of the article do...
Click to read more »websites that do not meet this guideline or that contradict the spirit of WP:BLP. Shortcut WP:ELREGWP:ELREG Outside of citations, links to other websites...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Sportswomen and Guinness World Record holder BLP that was originally copied from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kiran_Uniyal...
Click to read more »subject wants to article deleted. I agree that it should be removed per WP:BLP. hmwithτ 19:25, 8 September 2009 (UTC) Please discuss this deletion below...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:04, 6 March 2018 (UTC) Delete. arguably should be SD on BLP grounds, and if somehow a decision is cut to restore it, then some redaction...
Click to read more »types of BLP violations that we are looking for. But this information was not particularly egregious so don't go calling "BLP VIOLATION BLP VIOLATION"...
Click to read more »than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete ― It's an unreferenced BLP, and it's highly promotional. Dylan | ✉ | ✓ 19:33, 23 May 2023 (UTC) Comment:...
Click to read more »14:44, 23 September 2012 (UTC) Delete. No evidence of notability, unsourced BLP article. --@intforce 11:05, 29 September 2012 (UTC) Delete same as intforce...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Orphaned, unreferenced BLP. Would've PRODded if we added it Please discuss this deletion below, but...
Click to read more »should be to ensure that IP addresses should be shown in the histories of BLPs so that editors who repeatedly vandalize or deliberately add untrue information...
Click to read more »editor of this article feels fit. As such, this opens up significant WP:BLP concerns. Take the example of George W. Bush - he is being called a "Chinese...
Click to read more »Jeff G. has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Barely sourced BLP about an actress / singer with no claim of notability. Author removed qd...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This BLP strongly depends on non-reliable/independent sources (wikidata, wikialpha...
Click to read more »--Chip123456 TalkChanges 18:34, 18 September 2012 (UTC) Delete Unsourced BLP article with no evidence of notability. --@intforce 20:37, 18 September 2012...
Click to read more »not reliable sources, then this article should also be deleted under WP:BLP. Arthurfan828 (talk) 18:27, 26 February 2020 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »can't verify it, source is not available to me, but draftified for serious BLP reasons)". 2001:2020:303:AA01:1109:FE03:80E4:EF8D (talk) 18:28, 14 December...
Click to read more »Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced BLP Rathfelder (talk) 21:23, 14 May 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »(UTC) If a community banned editor removed material from a BLP which failed to meet WP:BLP, would you rollback their edit? Soup Dish (talk) 03:46, 29...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Actor, model & assistant director BLP without any inline citations to their filmography, fails WP:NACTOR. Web search...
Click to read more »NFL player is notable and this nom makes absolutely no sense. If there's a BLP vio it should be rd'd or OS'd. Why is this nom here? Praxidicae (talk) 01:51...
Click to read more »previous comment here. Even if clearly defined categories, they're still a BLP violation waiting to happen (or have already happened) and can be explained...
Click to read more »that was totally unneeded since you had actually dealt with the negative BLP issues by removing them. My concern is what would you have done if you had...
Click to read more »Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced BLP Rathfelder (talk) 20:50, 14 May 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Un-notable Nepalese BLP article; the page already has Advertisement and Fancruft tags. Additionally...
Click to read more »is sufficient to establish notability. As a BLP, the criterion is at least one verifiable reference (WP:BLP) Of the many, see Cornell website article,...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced BLP which is possible SALT evasion, see deletion log at https://en.wikipedia...
Click to read more »very promotional and there are zero sources listed which isn't good for a BLP fr33kman 05:56, 10 December 2025 (UTC) The quality of the article as written...
Click to read more »nobody. Also filled with dubious and spurious claims that clearly violate BLP, such as being married to Alessia Cara and having children with her, who...
Click to read more »remove those that were not reliable. I removed uncited sensitive statements (BLP), edited for NPOV, removed refs that failed verification or modified statements...
Click to read more »oppose. Purplebackpack89 (talk) 15:20, 9 September 2009 (UTC) No. It's like BLP; unsourced opposes are bad. —MC8 (b · t) 15:33, Wednesday September 9 2009...
Click to read more »Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced BLP Rathfelder (talk) 20:26, 19 May 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »October 2021 (UTC) Keep Nollywood star and a well sourced actor. Meets BLP criteria. --202.67.111.122 (talk) 18:13, 25 October 2021 (UTC) Delete Doesn't...
Click to read more »Nominator rationale isn't valid, we allow pages without sources here unless it's BLP or negative in nature. However, I will say delete if not expanded as this...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP without references and notability doubted. Possible advertisement. MathXplore...
Click to read more »claim of notability, therefore QD A4 was declined. Although this writer BLP does not explain anything about his works. In addition, National poet Of...
Click to read more »Wekeepwhatwekill has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:BLP and WP:CITE This page is about living (in most cases) people but contains...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete This fails BLP. Just because numerous news articles covered this person doing random edits...
Click to read more »Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced BLP Rathfelder (talk) 20:57, 14 May 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »Purplebackpack89 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Under-referenced BLP with little or no content. Copied from an English article that's being PRODded...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete. Even though the BLP issues in the lead have been addressed, there still does not seem to be any...
Click to read more »possible Notability problems (can not find much information on search) and BLP issues (find no sources at all for MS diagnosis) Please discuss this deletion...
Click to read more »reason: Questionable notability, possible promotional nature, and an unreffed BLP on top of that Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that...
Click to read more »you can get to deleting an article for no sources is if the article is a BLP article, which this article is not.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions)...
Click to read more »which are not reliable at all. I mean, writing is good, but WP:R and WP:BLP are policies that need to be followed. Wekeepwhatwekill Speak! 19:01, 5...
Click to read more »what I can find in English on the web, I will say delete as an unsourced BLP with no indication of notability. Osiris (talk) 16:03, 21 March 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »based on the chart activity mentioned, but this is currently an unreferenced BLP, and needs some neutral sources as opposed to what appears to possibly be...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP with sensational tense biography and unsourced awards/exhibition section...
Click to read more »having a "List of Asian drama actors". Also, without sourcing, this is a BLP nightmare. Griff (talk) 14:47, 27 January 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »merging. Delete per nom. (@Auntof6: Do you think I should mark it for prod blp at enwiki?) StevenJ81 (talk) 14:59, 31 March 2016 (UTC) I thought of that...
Click to read more »request Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP unreferenced for 12 years. Rathfelder (talk) 22:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) The article has style and tone issues to begin with. It is also BLP violation as it has no sources. A WP:RS does exist at [1], [2], [3] with...
Click to read more »legitimate sources in Indonesian. It is better to redirect this page with a BLP sources command (needs additional citations for verification/requires reference...
Click to read more »–Davey2010Talk 22:27, 4 December 2017 (UTC) Delete. – Both of these are BLP vios, too, I think. (Gives ages of minors without sources.) StevenJ81 (talk)...
Click to read more »localized copy of WP:BLP but it is largely a copy from en and has not been simplified much. Eptalon, where is the link to en's WP:BLP? I searched WP:Deletion...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Poorly sourced musician BLP, needs more inline citations, missing description of discography or recent...
Click to read more »request Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: unsourced BLP from Apr 2012. Notability; appears to lack significant coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »by mending or modifying, not deleting, the inserted text, per policy WP:BLP since 2007, as noted in essay WP:BLPMEND. When detecting excessive text removals...
Click to read more »voluntarily put himself in the public eye. However, the default for poorly sourced BLPs is to delete. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:20, 8 July 2018 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Poorly sourced BLP missing inline citations, using promotional tense. The given links seem to...
Click to read more »for the reason: Seems to have been written by the subject himself. Also BLP with no sources. Also notability is not established by RS. Also page is substantially...
Click to read more »Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced BLP Rathfelder (talk) 22:08, 14 May 2023 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »with the added maintenance in seeing that these consistently adhere to WP:BLP policies. I gave some examples over on Simple talk [link above] of where...
Click to read more »request Wiki Injustice has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP copied from English wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sherif...
Click to read more »more, africanwomenincinema is a blog, euromedwomen doesn't even mention the BLP subject, sadanatoualharf mentions a "Mai Mostafa" and appears to be sponsored/paid...
Click to read more »@Macdonald-ross: this probably. A province of Pakistan. The page is unsourced, BLP concerns. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC) The person...
Click to read more »@Djsasso: Wikid77 wrote an essay about this subject back in 2011. See Wikipedia:BLP policy advises fix over delete. If consensus is reached here, perhaps we...
Click to read more »wiki of this size, it presents real problems in terms of adherance to WP:BLP policies. Our small base of editors cannot possibly hope to cope with the...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This musician BLP claims notability but no inline citations for the discography. Web search...
Click to read more »myself unless it would be detrimental to the wiki if I didn't - for example BLPs, widespread vandalism etc. In any other examples, such as content disputes...
Click to read more »attack page in violation of literally every WMF policy requiring RS for BLPs... Chrissymad (talk) 20:49, 5 March 2018 (UTC) This request is due to close...
Click to read more »17:16, 15 June 2014 (UTC) Excuse me, I don't really agree with the idea BLP no source notices are used for people born in the last 115 years that are...
Click to read more »energy. (this edit is one less I can get in today finding references for BLPs - 4 less with edit conflicts) --Creol(talk) 17:19, 9 January 2013 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »for the reason: QD G4 was declined but the claims of notability in this BLP depends too much on primary sources, blog posts and passing mentions, as...
Click to read more »sources for the purposes of tagging insufficiently referenced BLPs. Since the WMF resolution on BLPs primarily concerned the English Wikipedia, if that practice...
Click to read more »category, if one exists. even though the last three aren’t a requirement on a BLP I like to seen them because it gives me a great overview. Once it is going...
Click to read more »sounds fine to me. Do you all think it might be a good idea to create a WP:BLP page here and have a note on it saying we follow the en.wp as a guideline...
Click to read more »be articles that would people help to learn the language. Suggestions: WP:BLP Important parts of the history (Nazi Germany, Napoleonic wars, WWI and II...
Click to read more »RFPP proposals in two and a half years. Every single one of them was on a BLP, recent death, or controversial topic; every one of them had been vandalized;...
Click to read more »MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is a BLP about a relationship coach, matchmaker, and company founder. Although there...
Click to read more »specifically categories used for BLPs would be a very good addition to the guideline. It might also be appropriate to add to the BLP guideline. User:Rus793 (talk)...
Click to read more »requirement for three entries? It would be used like {{BLP editintro}}, only for this purpose instead of for BLPs. --Auntof6 (talk) 11:04, 17 February 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »story that may go through any number of unforeseen changes. This is also a BLP. User:Rus793 (talk) 01:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »(UTC) For bios, GNG is not enough. Isn't there a notability guideline for BLPs? 88.110.38.249 (talk) 09:58, 15 August 2023 (UTC) For bios, the GNG can be...
Click to read more »request MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This BLP claims notability but statements strongly depend on primary sources. WP:RS...
Click to read more »information about the licensing issues in order to maintain WP:NPOV and WP:BLP, but those issues do not remove the independent coverage that already exists...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Unsourced BLP. Minorax (talk) 13:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC) We dont have much coverage of South...
Click to read more »previous deleted versions, so taking to RFD instead QD G4. This musical artist BLP has no details about discography and very little filmography. Internet search...
Click to read more »It happened 2-3 months ago. EhJJ (I think) received an OTRS request. A BLP wanted their article off-wiki because it contained defamatory content (which...
Click to read more »marked as a stub. Most flags on a stub (except important ones like maybe a blp issue) are redundant to the fact the article is already tagged as a stub...
Click to read more »wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ringo_Starr&action=edit&editintro=Template:BLP_editintro the Image is set to "Ringo.jpg" However, when I'm reading the article...
Click to read more »noticed the creation of the article on Loretta Sanchez which appears to be a BLP. It's a stub, but isn't marked as such and has no references. What would...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) We don't need references here for pages (unless it's a negative BLP). In addition, anyone who tag a page without doing BEFORE for notablity issues...
Click to read more »comprehensive which is often quite similar. With current events, science based or BLP articles, it will always be hard to stay comprehensive. People do new things...
Click to read more »(UTC) Thanks, RyanCross. We've added a few references, especially for one BLP. I think they are basically OK, but if anyone sees needed improvements, please...
Click to read more »order to help the wiki. We don't have hard and fast rules beyond things like BLP. See WP:IAR for example. Like I said above, notify that page, you either...
Click to read more »(I'll leave nameless) has done so much damage to a specific category of BLPs that most of the good faith reverts back to "good" versions are still reverts...
Click to read more »and deleted the articles on individual people. They were poorly written BLPs. The user has been blocked before on the English Wikipedia for similar issues...
Click to read more »receive any awards, i agree with his words but i’m finding such news of the BLP here. Another thing i previously mentioned its really hard for south asian...
Click to read more »articles up to date I think it may be worthwhile especially with how sensitive BLPs are. This would allow those who are working on promotion articles to higher...
Click to read more »argue lists like this probably actually take less work to maintain than BLPs, as there isn't much simplification needed to add or remove names. --Gordonrox24 | Talk...
Click to read more »verified, how can we assert that she has voiced these roles? Leaning keep but BLPs should be verifiable. --IWI (talk) 03:17, 13 December 2020 (UTC) Lists of...
Click to read more »mix of immaturity, and a poor understanding of core policies such as the BLP policy.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 21:54, 4 February 2011 (UTC) Exert 00:23, 5 February...
Click to read more »(UTC) Also, this isn't a reliable source. The page you want to delete is a BLP and everything must be verifiable - this is not. Thanks, Belwine • 💬 • 📜...
Click to read more »removed the "first openly gay..." claim as it was an unreferenced claim in a BLP. This article is now arguably suitable for speedy deletion Soup Dish (talk)...
Click to read more »Ichamara (talk) 02:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC) Delete Promotional, Unreferenced BLP.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:46, 15 November 2024 (UTC) yes...
Click to read more »and appears to be copied from somewhere. Oh, yeah, it's an unreferenced BLP, too Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't...
Click to read more »of a couple of arrests/investigations that shouldn't be included for WP:BLP reasons. WP:BEFORE is a good practice that I do my best to follow. Ravensfire...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't think this BLP is very notable. Some of these sources probably aren't even related to this...
Click to read more »violation of BLP. Nepaxt (talk) 20:15, 9 September 2015 (UTC) There are some depending on what you are trying to tag them for. Our BLP isn't quite a...
Click to read more »reply yet. But i got rejected from Patrollers right after creating many BLP pages. So, i wont make new pages now but i will fight for vandalism. I am...
Click to read more »because they are a global LTA causing havoc across several wiki's primarily to BLPs. I've requested glock. Chrissymad (talk) 23:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC) @Vermont:...
Click to read more »no contentious information and it's well-referenced enough to comply with BLP policies. Just not enough about him out there to write much more than a couple...
Click to read more »12 December 2016 (UTC) Done. I agree, we have a duty to protect hi-viz BLPs. Macdonald-ross (talk) 23:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC) @Some Gadget Geek: Please...
Click to read more »think about, because we do have a mandate to give special protection to BLPs. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC) There is a very low amount...
Click to read more »provide substantive discussion of her work and initiatives. With respect to WP:BLP, the article is written in a neutral, factual tone, avoids promotional language...
Click to read more »another artist. I just added a major secondary reference for notability. The {{BLP sources}} template may be replacing this request. --Eihel (talk) 20:30, 14...
Click to read more »Wikipedia works, an article has to be supported by reliable sources. (WP:BLP) Necromonger Wekeepwhatwekill Make America great again , impeach Trump 22:05...
Click to read more »ready to handle delete an article's revision history in case of a gross BLP violation and importing pages. In terms of deleting revision histories might...
Click to read more »article would be more helpful to find sources. I also noticed that this lawyer BLP does not clearly mention about her alma mater, it just says "studied Law...
Click to read more »"controversial", unreferenced facts should be taken even more seriously than BLP articles. Articles about diplomatic (and non-diplomatic) relations can easily...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Repeatedly created BLP with poorly sourced discography, possibly an non-simplified copy of ptwiki...
Click to read more »Amazon and Apple. Goldenwater29 (talk) 11:01, 9 July 2022 (UTC) Keep This BLP has reasonable real news coverage and qualifies for a Wikipedia page --Aso2018...
Click to read more »Despite repeated warnings about adding undue material to articles, including BLPs; as well as edit warring, the user has continued this behaviour in what appears...
Click to read more »This is a long term vandal who changes birth dates, locations, and other BLP info related to animators, and introduces other false information to animation...
Click to read more »are also no sources to back up anything in the article, a violation of the BLP policy. IWI (chat) 22:31, 21 January 2019 (UTC) Comment moved and formatted...
Click to read more »September 2021 (UTC) I can't think of a good place to merge it, given that BLPs rarely get merged. SHB2000 (talk) 08:52, 20 September 2021 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »regarding that the article is a biography of a living person, and having en:WP:BLP, it should be deleted (or even speedy deleted, when it lacks valid and independent...
Click to read more »ChristianMan16 04:24, 11 April 2008 (UTC) Keep I am certain he would fail the BLP policies.. mainly because he has been dead since 1944. His en:wp bio comes...
Click to read more »and police beat her, doesn't make notable forever. Overall I refer to WP:BLP#1E (enwiki). It is just an incident. Nothing else.--DMK-C5 (talk) 05:50,...
Click to read more »subtle (or even overt) political bias, and we should be extra mindful of the BLP policies in these cases. Note that when I refer to those currently in office...
Click to read more »without reliable sources, and not self-created, so are therefore probably BLP vios. StevenJ81 (talk) 22:33, 4 December 2017 (UTC) I noticed that after...
Click to read more »and flooding RC with various article tags (e.g. creating talk pages for BLP notices). Depending on how he does on EN, I have no objection to a review...
Click to read more »--Gordonrox24 | Talk 20:26, 20 December 2009 (UTC) Totally agree, this could turn into a BLP nightmare. If she's actually dead, something reliable will eventually surface;...
Click to read more »some templates because they are either used in articles, or used in the BLP page I'm converting. Please don't delete them, if you do, let me know so...
Click to read more »protected? MathXplore (talk) 03:59, 19 November 2022 (UTC) Non-notable actor BLP but an IP editor continues to remove QD tag. MathXplore (talk) 13:15, 19...
Click to read more »[[Special:Contributions/$1|$1]] ([[User talk:$1|talk]]) addition of [[WP:BLP|unsourced negative content]] to a biographical article, unsor;Reverted edits...
Click to read more »space was not part of the restriction) is forbidden. If there is an issue (BLP, PII) then they need to find another editor (or admin). This was another...
Click to read more »someone to go back and reference the entire thing as it is an unreferenced BLP.. It is a lot of work to keep a near orphan article which even the creator...
Click to read more »basic intro and an infobox, some of which are unsourced; some of those are BLPs. Are they not eligible for deletion if the information is simple, true and...
Click to read more »photographer actually seems to have played quite a large role in this incident. BLP 1E says that if "... the event is significant and the individual's role within...
Click to read more »appreciated, using his own Twitter account is not a valid reference for a BLP. I too have written many an article about technology, computers, routers...
Click to read more »adequate evidence on the page (evidence and sources are the bedrocks of BLPs). On balance delete the category, because it is so likely to be misused....
Click to read more »promotional text I have none of it. violation of copyrights I have none of it.' BLP violations I have none of it.' and many more as i think what happened should...
Click to read more »is imperative to back up all claims with good sources, especially with WP:BLP. If you are certain this topic is notable then it shan't be a problem for...
Click to read more »policy that is dependent on a standard that is not here on simple.wiki. BLP requires utmost care, but there is no justification to citing a nonexistent...
Click to read more »sortkeys in same line) as well as special:permalink/9270941#Massive_Asian_BLP_creators. MathXplore (talk) 03:25, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Done: Already...
Click to read more »are tagged and hopefully worked on. I would say we have 1000 unreferenced blp's, the ones in the category and those untagged. Plus there are many more unsourced...
Click to read more »QD'd as an unsimplified article copied from another Wikipedia. It's also a BLP with only one source. But of all its problems I thought the notability aspect...
Click to read more »the quality of content. I am familiar with Wikipedia's policies, including BLP, Copyright, Verifiability, and Notability, and I am committed to maintain...
Click to read more »reference (normally to the official "coming out/ openly gay" instance on BLP's) but the other three we are free to label people with at will it seems....
Click to read more »gave the example of Cassie Scerbo - we don't know where on LI she's from. BLP policy states that we cannot put a person into LGBT cats unless he self-identifies...
Click to read more »parliament they are inherently notable so the page should remain. Due to BLP policy issues with the many additions by various IP's of unverifiable content...
Click to read more »page is being vandalised or has info added that ins unsourced, in breach of BLP, etc by multiple IP's/Accounts then it needs to be protected, otherwise if...
Click to read more »too short Requests for deletion/Requests/2011/Template:Blp Requests for deletion/Requests/2011/Template:CBS shows Requests for...
Click to read more »source. I notice also that there seem to be issues as this since it is a BLP but there can be found no valid references to deal with NPOV and Validity...
Click to read more »permissions) I am a Wikipedia user from Nepal and work on Nepal Related Articles of BLP. I’ve created around 34 articles related to bio of living persons including...
Click to read more »permissions) I am an experienced user who is familiar with Wikipedia's policies on BLPs, reliability and notability. Having this right would help me in patrolling...
Click to read more »WP:Avoiding Wikipedia quirks WP:Blanking sections violates many policies WP:BLP policy advises fix over delete WP:Allow time to melt and look again (WP:MELT)...
Click to read more »not attack editors, please. When an article is created, especially a WP:BLP we have to use reliable sources. Almost all of the sources you listed above...
Click to read more »but because the article was not neutral, and negative piece, contrary to BLP, which I believe can properly be applied here.--Bärliner 21:59, 18 February...
Click to read more »deleted for both the large number of delete comments as well as "serious WP:BLP (w:WP:BDP, w:WP:BLPCRIME, WP:BIO1E) concerns alongside blatant w:WP:NOTNEWS...
Click to read more »(please tag me) 17:46, 14 October 2025 (UTC) BLPs don't necessarily mean just biographies. Quite often there are BLP related articles. We have to be careful...
Click to read more »hives/2024-07#Alexander_Jackson_Maier-Dlamini. 1st-4th tried to recreate BLPs (Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Alexander Jackson Maier-Dlamini)...
Click to read more »current title. Steven Slater air rage incident has POV concerns, violates WP:BLP, and has no reliable sources that deem the incident air rage. Renaming to...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log))) who made Josiah Akinloye Gboluwaga (another Nigerian BLP with similar impression), and this user has activity overlap at Dele Kelvin...
Click to read more »Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC) Demote: Article appears to have BLP issues Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 17:27, 11 April 2011 (UTC) Demote - So much red...
Click to read more »known for their quality. So we have social media, an unreliable source. On a BLP, that's insufficient, and a lot of anonymous IP users who think he's notable...
Click to read more »your articles lacked categories, stub tags etc., others were unreferenced BLPs, some were directly copied from enwiki without attribution. I also agree...
Click to read more »forced to keep by this user despite the sources not being reliable for a BLP. All of a sudden, just after 0600 on May 25, 2021 user Mohadic was created...
Click to read more »your articles lacked categories, stub tags etc., others were unreferenced BLPs, some were directly copied from enwiki without attribution. I also agree...
Click to read more »the only edit the named editor did on enWP was reverted for violation of BLP. There is also this Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requests/2017/Morning...
Click to read more »observation) Possibly related to special:permalink/9332591#Russian_promotional_BLP_creators. MathXplore (talk) 11:41, 30 January 2024 (UTC) Look like is same...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Simple talk/Archive_101#BLP_PROD_process). I also want to take this opportunity to reiterate that the BLP policy prohibits addition of heated...
Click to read more »"viewer's are in millions": First, there's no reference for that. (In fact, this BLP had no references at all.) The last time I saw it discussed, the number of...
Click to read more »Faramarzi, made by the 5th user. Please note that all articles above are BLPs from the same country. MathXplore (talk) 12:20, 15 May 2025 (UTC) All share...
Click to read more »log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) I recognize several accounts around a BLP with same expertise (scientist) and nationality which may be block evasion...
Click to read more »recreate the subject with different titles. Please keep an eye on users making BLPs with "silver", etc. MathXplore (talk) 14:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Will do, thx...
Click to read more »obituary rumours by removing existing references and converting articles to a BLP. The 1st user is blocked as WP:ONESTRIKE, 2nd user is blocked per behavior...
Click to read more »/Archives/2025-05#Hamid_Moradi . Please note that all articles above are BLPs from the same country like Special:Diff/10260937, and files are categorized...
Click to read more »All BLPs needing sources which is a parent of of All BLPs needing more sources, lacking sources, no sources. More than likely start with the BLPs no sources...
Click to read more »process and involve in them actively. I am pretty familiar with Wikipedia:BLP, Wikipedia:Copyright, Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Notability. Thanks...
Click to read more »International Association of Top Professionals (IAOTP), Stephanie Cirami (BLP related to IAOTP), and many deleted pages (Special:Log/StoRinehart). The...
Click to read more »familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines (especially Wikipedia:BLP, Wikipedia:Copyright, Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Notability)."...
Click to read more »with different capitalization (Hikaya). Please note that both are writing a BLP with same name, nationality, and occupation. MathXplore (talk) 01:43, 5 July...
Click to read more »biography, and ensure compliance with Wikipedia’s biographies of living persons (BLP) policy. Requested by: XiaYafit (talk) 05:58, 31 October 2025 (UTC) It hasn't...
Click to read more »article? It seems to be collecting more than a few trolls today and there are BLP issues given this is about a recent suicide. Ravensfire (talk) 15:22, 5 February...
Click to read more »watch | logs) Bobherry Talk My Changes 23:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC) This is a BLP that fits to QD G4/G5, please take care of this page. MathXplore (talk) 05:06...
Click to read more »as the 10th IGP of the Armed Police Force of Nepal and meets WP:GNG & WP:BLP. #QDA4, seriously? DIVINE 23:47, 13 April 2024 (UTC) @DIVINE I just did a...
Click to read more »source for biographies of living people, so that source is axed. Gotta follow BLP policies. See "There is no consensus on the reliability of The Daily Beast...
Click to read more »Special:Contributions/Gabriel.yiad (GY) is known for making complex football BLPs and they have been blocked. Special:Contributions/Gabriel.yiadom1 (GY1) is...
Click to read more »Please protect Dani Alves as many IP users are putting a death date on this BLP, which is not reliably sourced. Checking the web, it shows it is a rumor...
Click to read more »CA · checkuser (log)) All three accounts have concentrated on a non-notable BLP of a musician, originally created under the title Alireza Jadidi. They have...
Click to read more »20:22, 27 September 2025 (UTC) I think you've cited what needs to be cited. BLP is about avoiding libel so if someone did something that reflects poorly...
Click to read more »ongoing political event, I suggest protecting the article to avoid further BLP violations. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 09:38, 8 December 2024 (UTC) protected...
Click to read more »completely irrelevant nonsense. One IP warned by myself for unsourced info on a BLP (User:2A00:23C8:E105:D401:CD65:C0A9:A67C:FF8B) - others hitting it though...
Click to read more »selected revisions were restored, to hide the vandalism. Excessive vandalism/BLP violation was happening for a while and it could start again. Kk.urban (talk)...
Click to read more »its talk page)? It's our usual WMF-banned pest, this time trying to add BLP-violating material. I just did the same thing at enwiki. Antandrus (talk)...
Click to read more »protect it if he continues. --Ferien (talk) 21:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC) This BLP has been created again but I don't understand which part of the page can...
Click to read more »contributing here. Oh, they also said that when comparing BLPs, we have a higher percentage of decent BLPs about women than EnWP. I am writing this on this board...
Click to read more »can disagree about policies, including extremely important policies like BLP and NPA, without resorting to incivility and personal attacks of our own...
Click to read more »edit. Pure Evil (talk) 23:11, 4 September 2023 (UTC) A new user has made a BLP and repeating QD tag removals. The content seems to be a QD A4 case, and...
Click to read more »is far too broad a description to provide any encyclopedic value and is a BLP concern for me. Griff (talk) 14:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC) I didn’t see it...
Click to read more »Organizing Team Having come across User:CheerfulJug whilst deleting the BLP page they were editing it occurred to me we may wish to alter Twinkle to...
Click to read more »editnotice appears for articles belonging to a certain category. This is how the BLP editnotice works. See lines 300-328. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 09:01, 16...
Click to read more »for COI concerns, and User 3 was blocked from editing anything related to BLPs broadly construed. User 3 is now blocked indefinitely for copyvivo concerns...
Click to read more »reliable sources in those areas of the world as I feel we are not treating BLPs and notability issues of those nations fairly. We tend to grab a quick look...
Click to read more »