Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following one or more categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
but can still read Wikipedia. A block or ban applies to the person, not the account, unless the block or ban says differently. A block is a software setting...
Click to read more »to Keep. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:39, 9 February 2025 (UTC) First Alcoholic ban in India (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close...
Click to read more »two blocked EN users (Kalajan and A1a2s) become banned at Simple, and they've both socked after their ban. I really don't know what direction the project...
Click to read more »note, bans can be permanent or of fixed duration. Blocks implement bans only when there's ban evasion, or in cases where the editor is banned from the...
Click to read more »to violate Wikipedia rules or cause disruption, or get around blocks or bans. The user who uses a sockpuppet may be called a sock puppeteer or a sock...
Click to read more »fun! ;) Can you tell us why you were banned at the English Wikipedia? Well this discussion - In brief, I was banned for account sharing. When did you first...
Click to read more »Television ban (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) Chenzw Talk has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article...
Click to read more »was to Keep. Operator873talkconnect 04:20, 26 March 2019 (UTC) Movies banned in China (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close...
Click to read more »here), it was decided that contributions by banned users should not be deleted quickly, though global/WMF bans are another question. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk...
Click to read more »banned here. As to the other side of the coin; if the user dramatique on commons (who attacked gwib) is not the same than we banned here, our banning...
Click to read more »(UTC) Wikipedia:Simple Community response to the Wikimedia Foundation's ban of Fram on the English Wikipedia (edit · talk · history · links · watch ·...
Click to read more »indef ban or topic ban, the default would be a topic ban. If CM16 violates any of the conditions of his topic ban, he can always be indef banned quite...
Click to read more »Accounts jackjack (talk · contribs · logs · block log) - Indef ban: vandal only account. was banned quickly so only used one of the IP addresses in question...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) A ban (aka "community ban") is put in place following a community discussion when the consensus is in favor of the ban. For a ban to be lifted...
Click to read more »discussion. Result: Banned indefinitely by the community. Aaqib may appeal the ban 1 year from now, but no earlier. Clear consensus to ban. A few dissenting...
Click to read more »User:Iamandrewrice is currently a banned user on EN. Looking at the admin noticeboard discussion, I think this ban should be extended over here. The default...
Click to read more »enwiki; we should make use of his enwiki ban and let him add to our article base massively during his enwiki ban. fr33kman 06:42, 26 February 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »no matter how you slice it, a banned user has a lower general trust than a non-banned user, (even if they were banned on other projects), because there...
Click to read more »Wikipedia has a number of users who are currently, or have been in the past, banned from the English Wikipedia, or other Wikimedia Foundation projects. However...
Click to read more »actions These are rules about how users should act. Wikipedia:Blocks and bans Wikipedia:Copyrights Wikipedia:Deletion policy Wikipedia:Edit war Wikipedia:Image...
Click to read more »a ban. Enough is enough. alexandra (talk) 20:24, 19 October 2008 (UTC) Support a ban. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:25, 19 October 2008 (UTC) Support a ban. Synergy...
Click to read more »bans can be permanent. A ban is a community endorsed block (which we are heading towards, whether we like it or not - such is the definition of a ban)...
Click to read more »of users because of their language or spelling. Asking for a user to be banned or blocked, even if they have done nothing wrong. "Playing dumb". To stop...
Click to read more »community ban. Before weighing in, please take some time to (re-)familiarise yourself with: The original ban discussion First ban review (May 2012) Ban review...
Click to read more »this I think Tharnton's ban should be lengthened, or even lengthened to indef. For speeding ban lengthening, here is a direct to ban link. Tharnton obviously...
Click to read more »have a banning policy. Perhaps we should formulate one and add it to Wikipedia:Blocks and bans. We could use the English Wikipedia's banning policy for...
Click to read more »of ban prevents the user from editing any pages. To have a ban lifted requires another community discussion. You might be thinking of topic bans, which...
Click to read more »3 August 2026 (UTC) It was redirected by a sock puppet of a foundation-banned user, so I went ahead and put the article back. Thanks for bringing this...
Click to read more »to ban him already?! That's hardly the second chance we're known to give he should at least get one more week to turn around. then propose the ban.-- † CM16...
Click to read more »ban for continuing to break policy, please say so. VandalFighterFR(V) Bad warning? 18:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC) I think it's time Jonas was banned....
Click to read more »dispute resolution process. In extreme cases, this could include a site ban by the agreement of the community. The three revert rule, if observed, must...
Click to read more »like this. To me, it doesn't make sense to have it both ways. A ban is a ban. If he's banned, he shouldn't edit at all, good or bad. If the good articles...
Click to read more »simple-wiki in a long time... I concur with AE. It's about time your community ban on en-wiki was lifted. --Dylan620 (Sign this plz) 23:57, 23 January 2009...
Click to read more »find it easily. Avoiding using bans the first time someone gets something wrong. Try talking to a user before you ban them. Try to be a fair member of...
Click to read more »personally think that this user should've gotten the indefinite ban a while ago, when he was banned the second time. At that time, I noticed that he was making...
Click to read more »اردو (Urdu) • oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча (Uzbek) • 粵語 (Cantonese) • 閩南語 / Bân-lâm-gí (Minnan) List of all Wikipedias – Languages working together – Start...
Click to read more »deletion was to Delete. Ternera (talk) 16:25, 2 December 2025 (UTC) Gas Cars Banned in 2035 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close...
Click to read more »one chance situation (due to his ban on en) violated that one chance. Personally I think he already did since we banned him here...so really this should...
Click to read more »discuss the ban to get de-banned if I get banned? --Psl631 (talk · contribs) 05:50, 13 May 2018 (UTC) That depends on the terms of the ban. We will tell...
Click to read more »"Pages created by banned users in violation of their ban having no substantial edits by others." - in other words, user ABC is banned from editing in a...
Click to read more »edit or you ban will be permanent" (BrownE34). According to this Ionas's block should now be a Indef Ban (as "Comunity Ban per the EN Banning policy). However...
Click to read more »blocked or banned user, who is evading their block or ban when the page was created. The main or only contributor of that page is the blocked/banned user,...
Click to read more »articles he says he has fine, if he is the same time-intensive Benniguy the ban is reimposed.--Bärliner 19:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC) I fully support the above...
Click to read more »kept in this encyclopedia. Simple English Wikipedia is not a place for banned users to try to get unbanned from another website. Simple English Wikipedia...
Click to read more »25 June 2011 (UTC) He already was banned so this wasn't really a ban discussion but a request to reapply the ban he was evading which was already in...
Click to read more »be blocked or banned. Definitely shows poor judgement. -DJSasso (talk) 17:24, 22 December 2009 (UTC) Agreeing with all above. Being banned at EN is scary...
Click to read more »more waiting period. Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban, and when appealing for an unblock after the required waiting period, state...
Click to read more »changing. Users who continue to add hoaxes to Wikipedia can be blocked or banned from Wikipedia for breaking our rules. Instead of adding wrong information...
Click to read more »on that.-- ✧ CM16 23:49, 20 November 2008 (UTC) Even banned users can appeal their bans. Banned doesn't necessarily equal banished forevor. Anyway, that...
Click to read more »show that they are not here to build an encyclopedia could be blocked or banned. Not wanting to contribute. Long history of vandalism that does not show...
Click to read more »block or a ban. In the case of a ban, it must be a ban on editing the Simple English Wikipedia (not any other Wikipedia) or a WMF ban. The ban may be a...
Click to read more »was to Delete. Speedily deleted by User:The Rambling Man. List of smoking bans (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) Purplebackpack89...
Click to read more »by a banned user in violation of ban (CSDH)) 19:02, 4 May 2020 MER-C talk contribs deleted page Kasia Urbaniak (G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user...
Click to read more »open for banned users to evade their ban, see WP:PROXY for more.-- Chris†ianMan16 t c r 06:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC) You mean that Fairfield banned an IP...
Click to read more »Template:This week in history was created and added to the Main Page CR90 was banned (:() by the community The wiki promoted its 45th admin NonvocalScream became...
Click to read more »Theta 314 (talk) 15:00, 7 March 2011 (UTC) Since Editor XXV is community banned, your account has been blocked. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:41, 7 March 2011...
Click to read more »what I said. In dealing with a community banned user, who is continuing to show editing that got him banned in the first place, he should not be editing...
Click to read more »For now, I just want to point out that the proposed ban is not a topic ban, it is a complete ban. As far as I've seen, there isn't just one specific area...
Click to read more »they got banned. Odds are, their behaviour was just as questionable a week ago. For the new accounts that get banned, they are usually a ban on sight...
Click to read more »obviously only for known banned people. And to be honest for alot of banned editors its a badge of honour. We never used to have bans/blocks transfer over...
Click to read more »also launched two "prank" attacks on me, and in my opinion needs to be banned for immaturity and bad conduct) needs to be documented, in addition to coöperation...
Click to read more »like you think lawyers do. Unblock requests are not legal proceedings. A ban or block is a removal of your privilege to change Wikipedia. Any legal right...
Click to read more »say to people that you will report them to an administrator, have them banned, or sue them in court for disagreeing with you. Do not ask for or post personal...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. merge and redirect to ban--Gordonrox24 | Talk 20:51, 26 October 2010 (UTC) Banhammer (edit · talk ·...
Click to read more »there to report the vandal to "administrators". They are able to block and ban users who do not follow the rules of Wikipedia, and this includes vandalism...
Click to read more »discussion about banning going on, so the blocking admin still gets to reevaluate (or indeed any admin for that matter). Now, that the community ban discussion...
Click to read more »active now. I would like to mention that Andrew Kelly (talk · contribs) was banned by the community. That's all for now. Happy editing! Cheers, Pmlineditor ∞...
Click to read more »in bad faith may result in you being blocked. Blocks are different than bans. They can rollback changes. This lets them quickly undo all the changes by...
Click to read more »other hand, it makes me sad to think of the need to block, or even worse, ban anybody. Vandalism seems to be increasing in proportion as kind and selflessly...
Click to read more »to not need a ban, but maybe with mentorship and topic bans, which have been implemented. Fast forward to today, I see only topic ban violations (which...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete as hoax, and ban its editor. Could have been put up for QD. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:44, 7...
Click to read more »been reviewing the contribution and ban history of the contributor. I believe that Enough time has passed since the ban The editor has learned better now...
Click to read more »tools. Self-nomination Q Could you explain the difference in a block and ban? A: A block is a preventative measure for the protection of the site, and...
Click to read more »ban reviews: The original ban discussion First ban review (May 2012) Ban review (August 2012) Ban review (January 2014) Ban review (March 2015) Ban review...
Click to read more »While I only have 1 edit, I have about 700 on the (Where I am currently banned, however, I have addresed these issues). I will be able to help WP in many...
Click to read more »Just a heads up that PIO, who is banned from editing Wikipedia [1] has come over here as User:Pio, and has been pretty active today [2] after the blocking...
Click to read more »Flying Spaghetti Monster! 18:32, 20 August 2008 (UTC) I think a community ban of some kind is in order. Revert/delete/block anything this guy does. It's...
Click to read more »created the articles should be banned or not. The issue is whether or not his articles should be deleted. A user can be banned without having his articles...
Click to read more »that Aaqib has learned from his mistakes in the time that he has been banned; the ban has therefore served its purpose and can now be removed. Aaqib is reminded...
Click to read more »with good sense of humour. I would only use power to inforce justice and ban those in trouble making routes. Candidate's acceptance: I do. Strong Oppose...
Click to read more »didn't. When he was let off his ban last time it was under the condition that even one problem would land him back on the ban. This clearly was a problem...
Click to read more »not personally banned it and, as you know, disagree with the ban completely. Instead, it is the community's old consensus that has banned it. Some editors...
Click to read more »automatically banning people banned on other projects came up I believe it was people said if they waste their one chance and get banned they could be...
Click to read more »encyclopedia. The Simple English Wikipedia is not a place for blocked or banned users to try to get unblocked or unbanned from another website. The Simple...
Click to read more »original ban Chenzw proposed. Without these votes, it is still 6 for a complete ban, and 3 for a topic ban, so the two thirds for a complete ban does not...
Click to read more »am not able to express this oppinion there on ENwp since I am currently banned there. Can we have a voting decision here? so then the voting conclusion...
Click to read more »contribs deleted page Mohammad Fathy Saoud (G5: Created by a banned or blocked user in violation of ban or block (TW)) 16:10, 7 July 2017 Mariya mon960 talk contribs...
Click to read more »August 2012 (UTC) Disagree, continue ban - It appears that this ban seemed to be just a mere annoyance, when the ban is hoped to allow the editor "to reflect...
Click to read more »are, in many cases, a second home to banned English Wikipedia users. We offer a second chance for users banned there to both contribute and show they...
Click to read more »our stance on banned users moving over to seWP, I considered a ban here also under the rule allowing an admin to ban and block banned users from other...
Click to read more »decided on the ban may no longer exist in six months to a year. The community that exists then will have to implicitely bear the ban, and may not even...
Click to read more »with others. If this continues to be disruptive, a "topic ban" may be better than banning the editor from the entire website, because some people can...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: User:Christianrocker90 has left Wikipedia under a ban instead of a retirement, and thus this redirect will not be necessary to...
Click to read more »checkuser/Case/ForestH2. With this confirmation, User:ForestH2 should now be considered banned from Simple, for using sockpuppets to attempt to gain adminship. He will...
Click to read more »the ban was evaded), but a community ban prohibits all editing on this Wikipedia. Whether such edits are good or not is irrelevant. The previous ban discussion...
Click to read more »Kennedy (talk) 09:11, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Oppose you were suspected of ban evading on enwiki just yesterday, in which you vandalised. A big cause for...
Click to read more »English Wikiquote, which got you banned, and the reasons brought up in your previous RfAs. You just scraped past a ban proposal last month - far, far too...
Click to read more »deserving people a second change. Others would say that someone banned from en should be banned from all WMF projects. Our current policy reads as follows:...
Click to read more »default policy for this is that we choose which bans to enforce from other wikis, unless it's a formal ban from Jimbo Wales. I think this shouldn't be one...
Click to read more »edits before requesting rollback again. Maybe 2 months since you are 3x banned on en-wiki. Darubrub (Let me know) 16:09, 28 July 2021 (UTC) OK. Can I ask...
Click to read more »March 2018 (UTC) 1) User is not in good standing, as they are currently banned from using Huggle due to using it disruptively. 2) User has been here less...
Click to read more »page Javed Haider Zaidi (G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban) 16:18, 23 November 2023 Fram talk contribs moved page...
Click to read more »view that inappropriate relationships are not harmful to children), or who identify themselves as pedophiles, will be blocked or banned indefinitely....
Click to read more »(-300) 25-50%? (-1,000) More than half? (-5,000, a criminal charge, and a ban) Has Wikipedia brought down your grades? (500, get back to work!!!) Has Wikipedia...
Click to read more »this wiki not delete articles because it was created by banned users in violation of their ban SHB2000 (talk) 12:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC) Actually not...
Click to read more »the old rule, the user must be banned here and then a sock created the page after the ban to be eligible, an user banned in enwp have no relevance here...
Click to read more »difference between global block and ban. In this case, it is a global block. Like bans here, global bans require consensus and ban people indefinitely from all...
Click to read more »based Muslim association. If I further read the EnWP article, they were banned in the UK, India and Pakistan for spreading religious hatred / breaching...
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedy Delete - This is a clear attempt at circumventing his topic ban on the English Wikipedia, something he has been blocked nearly 10 times for...
Click to read more »Speed limit. In April 2012 he was been banned from enWP indefinitely. The discussion leading up to his enWP ban can be seen here. In particular may I draw...
Click to read more »goals of the project may be removed (see below), as well as edits from banned users. In general, it is considered polite to not make big changes to another's...
Click to read more »After I was too immature and exhausted the communities patience I was banned there and I found simple and created a new account here as ChristianMan16...
Click to read more »be deleted, since they are being created in violation of their block or ban. There's pretty much no point in having this discussion. Lugia2453 (talk)...
Click to read more »barely a month of experience, and who has already been warned and received a ban from using Huggle. The page obviously doesn't warrant QD, but I will pass...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. The song ban incident may be notable, but WP:BLP1E applies here. Also see w:Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »he'd have a block log a mile long, and we should really be considering a ban, and revert/remove any edits this user makes. Frankly, we'll be much better...
Click to read more »long run. Q: What is the difference between a block and a ban? A: Blocks are made by admins. Bans are made by the community, usually for project disruption...
Click to read more »November 2010 (UTC) Banned users are always allowed here, but are subject to a one strike rule. They screw up one time and we ban them here as well. -DJSasso...
Click to read more »over and over again will be treated as vandalism and can lead to a block or ban. If you have any questions about how to use Wikipedia, please ask them at...
Click to read more »January 2013 (UTC) Too much funny business in the past, including socking and ban evasion. Kansan (talk) 23:43, 2 January 2013 (UTC) Have no problem with him...
Click to read more »anyone that is banned on the regular English Wikipedia from coming here to edit. I see of it as though we are both a testing grounds for banned users to rejoin...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article has been created from Ban User Ksy 20:04, 12 November 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »DJSasso's ban of Racepacket intimidated me in 2012. This 2012 ban said to me that DJSasso feels free to use his administrative tools to ban anyone who...
Click to read more »struck out by the editor who made the comment, the comment being made by a banned user, and others. "Neutral" comments are hosted in the "Comments" section...
Click to read more »2004, 10–19. Shortcuts WP:YTWP:YT WP:YOUTUBEWP:YOUTUBE There is no complete ban on linking to YouTube or other user-submitted video sites. The links must...
Click to read more »circumventing a ban on en, and I think that we should let Ottava know that Simple English Wikipedia does not wish to be seen as assisting a ban evasion. Griffinofwales...
Click to read more »09:12, 11 August 2025 (UTC) Comment: May be created by a user evading EN ban, see related EN page.--Cactus🌵 hi ツ 13:21, 19 August 2025 (UTC) This request...
Click to read more »impose topic bans etc which can take up all kinds of forms. They have been implemented in the past as a first step instead of full out ban. -DJSasso (talk)...
Click to read more »long-term abuser. On English Wikipedia, creation by a banned editor in violation of their ban is grounds for speedy deletion of articles they have created...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Questionable notabilty, and created by banned users. Peterdownunder (talk) 22:24, 7 October 2016 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »upper hand in a content dispute is prohibited, and can result in a block or ban. Wikipedia places importance on both the neutrality of articles and the ability...
Click to read more »Yegoyan who's banned at enWP. Pmlineditor Talk 17:27, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Should not desysop or ban folks simply because thay are banned at another project...
Click to read more »seem to apply to schools and I'm not sure if it's a user evading a block or ban. This school is not notable due to lack of significant coverage. Justarandomamerican...
Click to read more »the ArbCom list before then...and if they were trolls why was the one-year ban counter reset anyway? Cassandra (talk) 06:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC) "Humans being...
Click to read more »2012 (UTC) Simple Wiki doesn't ban people for being banned elsewhere. Otherwise, half of the users here would be banned. And Macdonald-ross, you didn't...
Click to read more »shows notability. We don't have to automatically delete everything by a banned user. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:34, 10 October 2015 (UTC) Keep Per Auntof6, if...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Also, a ban is a social construct that may include a ban on a certain area or topic, which may be enforced by blocking. A ban is not necessarily...
Click to read more »trouble to deal with, or need some time to cool off. A ban is also different to a block (see Wikipedia:Bans and blocks). As I said, all this can be learned over...
Click to read more »mistake I have learned from. However, with Jonas, I am very much for his ban, enough disruption was enough. With Tharnton, I decided to stay out of that...
Click to read more »project. Furthermore, one of the main activities that led to the community ban from the English Wikipedia was your persistent refusal to stop creating frivolous...
Click to read more »would link to User:Microchip08). Of course, and I support User:Microchip08's ban is rather 'clunky' — Now then, Microchip08 is a rather nice guy is a lot...
Click to read more »used in WMF-banned notices has changed to a black Wikimedia logo. And also it adds the page to the correct category Category:Wikipedians banned by the Wikimedia...
Click to read more »the ethos of Wikipedia Simple English, appears to be attempt by editor at ban evasion. Nayyn (talk) 21:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »14 days, I see no consensus for a ban. I'm willing to unblock, so this also means that there is also no defacto ban. Best, Jon@talk:~$ 03:02, 3 November...
Click to read more »Keep. G5 only applies if the article was primarily contributed by the banned/blocked user. In this case, Davey2010 had made significant, nontrivial changes...
Click to read more »vandalize, or make an account just to vandalize, you may be blocked forever or banned from changing Wikipedia. You will also be unable to create another account...
Click to read more »disagree with the last condition about banned users. I think that the adoption system should be completely seperate from bans/blocks - IMO adoptions should only...
Click to read more »Creations by banned or blocked users-Persia (talk) 07:14, 26 December 2021 (UTC) Since this is copy/pasted from EN, and since the banned user didn't create...
Click to read more »Rambling Man (talk) 08:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC) Kennedy, you do know I'm banned at en and can't get help from there right? This is why I asked here, and...
Click to read more »for ages, and made a huge fuss when he was banned, despite his disruption. And yet he's still not banned. We spend loads of time discussing stuff when...
Click to read more »in the beginning...he discovered I was banned on enWP and went to WP:AN when I showed up and asked for a ban for me here too...he was denied it and we've...
Click to read more »was not what he was banned for. But consider this: if he was a dreadful editor as well as the behaviour for which he was banned, how much the more should...
Click to read more »decide that they should come and cause problems on Simple because they were banned from English). I also think, though it is harder to prove, that I have helped...
Click to read more »not appreciate the ban that was put into place, nor has any remorse for that user's previous actions. As a result the community ban remains in effect,...
Click to read more »including Ottava Rima's one, with a contradiction, he opposed him because he's banned on en.wiki, however he supported CR90?? ¿what? --Diego (talk) 15:33, 25...
Click to read more »article possibly with references might be notable, so this delete is not a ban on re-creation (withproper sourcing, ideally in comprehensible language.--Eptalon...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Main reason I was suggesting a ban is because lots of non-administrators who suggested a ban and a ban is essentially a block by the community...
Click to read more »find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. Also created by a globally-banned sock, RFD'ing in case others may find things I haven't, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk...
Click to read more »deletion for the reason: the article was created by Tishreen07, who was banned from Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tishreen07 Iranian112...
Click to read more »problem is personally. Perhaps it's our reputation as a dumping ground for banned enwiki users, the unwelcoming atmosphere, and the poor state of most of...
Click to read more »determine the abilities of the candidate. 3. Have you ever been blocked or banned from any other Wikimedia Foundation projects? A. Yes, there were some instances...
Click to read more »disruptive editing with many such options ranging from topic bans to blocks to complete bans. There is zero in the above proposal that would actually have...
Click to read more »to each other. This is usually done when we suspect that a user who is banned or blocked, may be using Wikipedia under a different name, which isn't allowed...
Click to read more »Thanx:) --§ Snake311 (T + C) 23:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC) Plus blocked or banned users Ionas, Benniguy and KA (counting all her sock's edits) as well as...
Click to read more »work done by sockpuppets of elsewhere banned users like me who have reached a good level of experience after this ban from a much bigger wiki. ONaNcle (talk)...
Click to read more »nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki abuse by globally banned Arshifakhan61 compromising an account. JavaHurricane (talk) 07:00, 4 December...
Click to read more »for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki abuse by account hacked by WMF-banned spammer Arshifakhan61 JavaHurricane (talk) 07:08, 4 December 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »one account being used at the same time. Evading a ban is different to socking. And that particular ban was particularly harsh. It's sad you have to bring...
Click to read more »The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Created by a banned user/returning vandal who creates movie articles for her and her friends...
Click to read more »was not what he was banned for. But consider this: if he was a dreadful editor as well as the behaviour for which he was banned, how much the more should...
Click to read more »think the people who are removing the arguments they do not like should be banned from wikipedia. I do not know whether these are folks who like Korean pop...
Click to read more »25 October 2008 (UTC) Update: Bluegoblin7 is confirmed as a Wikipedia banned user, Chris19910 (talk · contribs) via the checkuser mailing list. PeterSymonds...
Click to read more »support that must be reached. He is still distracting everyone, even while banned. He wants us all to keep an open mind about him. Here's what I have to say...
Click to read more »for deletion was to Delete. WMFBAN evasion. Any page created by a WMF-banned editor can be deleted, and here there are no other contributions --Ferien...
Click to read more »repeated comment that he doesn't care what standards are, and maybe be banned from PGA for six months. Purplebackpack89 (talk) 01:50, 1 October 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »borderline. Article in enwiki deleted mostly because of contributions of banned socks. Do we know if this is an issue here? StevenJ81 (talk) 21:58, 24 October...
Click to read more »merging. According to the source, he was a test-level cricketer who was banned for fixing matches. The article says nothing, and in effect has no content...
Click to read more »to none Polopolo379 (talk) 09:48, 11 March 2008 (UTC) The nominator is a banned user --Bärliner 13:55, 11 March 2008 (UTC) Candidate's acceptance: Support...
Click to read more »w:en:User:Projects is officially globally banned and listed at w:m:List of globally banned users. Can you warrant analogous global ban for w:en:user:Wikinger mentioned...
Click to read more »Creation by blocked or banned user', value: 'blocked', tooltip: 'Created by a blocked or banned user, who is evading their block or ban when the page was created...
Click to read more »article three times. Looking at User_talk:203.36.44.16, this user has been banned before in May, and then given several final/last warnings. Staeiou (talk)...
Click to read more »and several other users are sockpuppets of a banned user. What do we suggest? What was the original ban for? PS. SarahM has personally E-mailed me and...
Click to read more »added by 餃子のタレ (talk • contribs) 22:37, 14 May 2023 (UTC) Comment: Was banned for sockpuppetry. Dylan | ✉ | ✓ 11:07, 21 May 2023 (UTC) Delete All of...
Click to read more »up a lot of time. In fact, do not be surprised if I do not return when my ban on en: wiki expires. I may still edit a small amount, but not often. Thanks...
Click to read more »to mention User:Chris thinks he can ban everyone unilaterally and User:Chris Thompson is a fag because he banned Soprani. --§ Snake311 (T + C) 00:26,...
Click to read more »would fix itself. Instead of trying to get more editors, put a ban (and I mean, total ban) on sub-stubs, have a DRAMAOUT for as long as possible, raise...
Click to read more »talk 08:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC) Okay, I have decided to remove the vote of a banned user, Choosnink. This is due to the fact that "she" is the sockpuppet of...
Click to read more »Scorpions and en:User:Total Eclipse 2017. The extend of your socking got you banned from enwiki altogether. Without comment on your edits here, Not done given...
Click to read more »Musée Annam be globally banned from editing all Wikimedia projects. You are invited to participate at Requests for comment/Global ban for Musée Annam on Meta-Wiki...
Click to read more »there are sentences that aren't verifiable. Page was created by a global banned user. Page cites original research. Sources are in Polish. LOLHWAT (talk)...
Click to read more »user's behaviour is similar to that of another banned user, citing only two things: the fact that both the banned user and the new one both wrote essays about...
Click to read more »active block/ban/unblock notices are required to stay on talk pages as long as the block/ban is in effect. If a user is currently blocked/banned unblock notices...
Click to read more »think you will be active here. The only policy written so far is Wikipedia:Bans and blocks so there isn't even much reading to do before you become one. :)...
Click to read more »reason for delete, but this article was created by the troll user who was banned eternally from English Wikipedia. Anyway, Really, can't find any sources...
Click to read more »just asked Barras to lift it? IMO, I was ban without cause or appeal; I should be entitled to contest the ban much as one would contest a block Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈...
Click to read more »Da Punk '95 (talk · contribs) After a progress report with 2 months left on my ENWP ban. Da Punk '95 talk 21:19, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Reviews Review by – RyanCross...
Click to read more »April 2010 (UTC) User:Лъчезар was banned on regular Wikipedia for pushing Moon hoax conspiracy theories. I suggest banning him here too as that's his major...
Click to read more »user came to us today (April 6) and after a while editing took part in the ban disscussion of Inkpen2, it made me curious cause it was in opposition of...
Click to read more »who knows the story add on to this stub article? Thank you. I once got banned for trying to edit Animal Farm on english wikipedia by DreadStar. userpage...
Click to read more »again requested that we consider removing his community ban. For those unfamiliar, the original ban discussion can be found here. -Mh7kJ (talk) 16:35, 23...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) @Naleksuh: Although I am opposing the global ban on meta, I will support a local ban on simple wikipedia as this behaviour is clearly non constructive...
Click to read more »We have a policy of one strike for someone banned on another wiki. If they mess up once here they get banned here as well. -DJSasso (talk) 21:52, 5 March...
Click to read more »policies Deletion Attack page Oversight Enforcement policies Blocks and bans Page protection Content guidelines Citing sources Disambiguation Do not start...
Click to read more »page; one admin and one user Benninguy has talked a lot with before his ban. Otherwise it could be purely concidencial. --§ Snake311 (T + C) 23:37, 27...
Click to read more »Please do not insult me or assume malicious intent. Just delete the page and ban this topic or whatever you need to do. I apologized for the poor form thing...
Click to read more »who is engaged in intentional distortion should, at a minimum, be topic-banned. On the other hand, the allegation that an editor is a distortionist when...
Click to read more »more detailed one? It makes no sense to me. Now if I had my way, I would ban all stub creation, and articles should only exist if they meet, say, criteria...
Click to read more »request for deletion was to Delete. QD as creator is sock of globally banned Slowking4 CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:36, 14 April 2026 (UTC) Mary Haverstick...
Click to read more »interest. One of dozens of templates brought over by a user who is now topic banned. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC) Delete per nom....
Click to read more »End date:March 22 2009 Simple Wikipedia has became the vandalism dump for banned en.wikipedia.org users and many of the great users on this wiki that dedicate...
Click to read more »unused. The templates were put up in early June by the user who is now banned from editing on geology pages. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:35, 27 September...
Click to read more »found guilty of fixing the score will risk immediate disqualification and banning from the this and the next Nations' Cup. Any judge found guilty of fixing...
Click to read more »harassive banned editors who claim admins and those who disagree with them have lost their minds. It could also serve as encouragement to banned/blocked...
Click to read more »64.0/18. Those of you who have been around for a while know him -- he's banned project-wide, and has been vandalizing and harassing us since 2005. Because...
Click to read more »the account is globally locked. Seems to be abusing sock puppetry to evade ban. There is no way that I would support adminship here. Blissyu2 (talk) 08:44...
Click to read more »was not banned at en.wiki ONESTRIKE technically does not apply to him, he was only indefinitely blocked, onestrike requires a community ban. Now I realize...
Click to read more »deleted page Kumaran Mahalingam (G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Wikibaji) in violation of ban or block) 09:44, 20 July 2017 Doc James talk contribs...
Click to read more »2021 (UTC) From what I can tell, that appears to be an edit from a WMF-banned editor. (he edits about Stalin a lot at the moment) Yes, his edits should...
Click to read more »08:57, 20 July 2009 (UTC) I have been in a dialogue via e-mail with a user banned here and cross-wiki, and he is genuinely remorseful for his actions. Apparently...
Click to read more »(and it's corresponding pages on other projects) was created by a globally banned user. Vermont (talk) 01:35, 28 February 2020 (UTC) Bahadir Yenishehiroglu...
Click to read more »(talk) 07:08, 22 October 2025 (UTC) You were not banned @ en for creating pacific futsal pages. You were banned for continually acting in ways considered unhelpful...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Strong support--Masha Ashner (talk) 00:34, 24 June 2009 (UTC) - Banned user. Chenzw Talk 14:16, 27 June 2009 (UTC) Support per EhJJ :-) -- Mercy...
Click to read more »19:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC) The pages mentioned above were vandalised by a banned user. Nigos (talk · contribs) 06:36, 30 May 2020 (UTC) IP 12.31.111.175...
Click to read more »fr33kman 03:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC) Please consider taking part in CR90's ban review fr33kman 00:11, 16 March 2011 (UTC) A concern has been growing on...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: This page is Created by a blocked or banned user Iranian112 (talk) 15:04, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »the interaction ban are laid out in the English Wikipedia's interaction ban policy. These bans are in place for four months. The bans will be lifted at...
Click to read more »know how to, please submit a request at m:SRG with the reason LTA or Lock/Ban evasion. PieWriter (talk) 13:55, 31 March 2026 (UTC) Sorry, I am new to this...
Click to read more »Edit warring with WMF banned users is not though. SHB2000 (talk) 01:47, 10 August 2021 (UTC) Even WMF banned users, WMF global ban policy only says their...
Click to read more »other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Speedy delete This is a banned editor who is only here to troll Wikimedians. There's no real claim of notability...
Click to read more »and either see something that isn't there or be looking for a reason to ban a user where there isn't one. If I can't be comfortable doing a check then...
Click to read more »i would like to know why i am banned? i was told it was for chinese numbers but then i was told that was irrelevant — Preceding unsigned comment added...
Click to read more »four also previously suggested a topic ban for the both of us [73]. Pure Evil, would you still support a topic ban against me? I do not agree with being...
Click to read more »(UTC) SimonKSK, other than Wikipedia:Simple_talk/Archive_58#Sunstar_NW_XP_ban and User_talk:SimonKSK/Archive_1#RFDs, have we had contact on here? I'm curious...
Click to read more »the last resort, if unblock requests have been declined, or if a permanent ban on the user is requested. These are just some of the issues an ArbCom or...
Click to read more »unnoticed. Can't IP address be banned for a limited time, and be given a second chance? I'm sure many users who were banned would like the opportunity for...
Click to read more »26 August 2009 (UTC) Try http://webchat.freenode.net instead. Mibbit was banned from Freenode's network a couple of months ago. Best, PeterSymonds (talk)...
Click to read more »position. The vote was reverted and the IP in question was permenantly banned as a proxy. It is also a distinct possibility that Blissyu2 is another sockpuppet...
Click to read more »Artricle about a child acresss, born 2005. Was deleted onEnWP (created by a banned user); listed as QD ("Complex article, little sign of simplification", A3)...
Click to read more »(banned user Mariusz) 00:43, 30 Jan 2004 Angela deleted "Trinty" (banned user Mariusz) 00:43, 30 Jan 2004 Angela deleted "Auxiliary equipment" (banned...
Click to read more »restored the banned user's edits immediately after his ban today. And surprisingly, you started speaking on talk pages immediately after he got banned, using...
Click to read more »that removes useful edits from banned editors. I'd just ask Ryulong to stop if he's reverting useful edits by banned editors and move on. --Philosopher Let...
Click to read more »reason for adminship. You will need to understand how to administer block or bans, what the deletion policy is, how to handle disputes, etc. Admins are expected...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: This page is Created by a blocked or banned user Iranian112 (talk) 21:51, 25 April 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, created by now globally banned user Slowking4. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:03, 10 April 2026 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »org/wiki/Battle_of_Ko%C3%A7hisar And this page was created by a blocked or banned user Iranian112 (talk) 12:51, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »warn the victims to admit their mistakes or face severe blocking or topic bans. The reason the victims are quickly blamed is because they clearly wrote...
Click to read more »(UTC) He is finally blocked (or banned). I think he should be banned (pity that I didn't take part in the Benninguy ban discussion). --§ Snake311 (T +...
Click to read more »fr33kman talk 06:37, 16 August 2009 (UTC) Today is an example of why we should ban anonymous editing, though I don't know if we have the authority to do so...
Click to read more »is banned by the community it is a different story. If a Checkuser is suspicious of sockpuppetry and runs a CU and finds the person is the banned user...
Click to read more »making this rfd is that the author is currently questionable for a community ban. I think we should wait for that to finish then continue this as that may...
Click to read more »October 2012 (UTC) I've made this change to our blocks and bans policy, stating that a block/ban is for the person, not the account, after seeing this comment...
Click to read more »of their work. I do not find any evidence they are globally banned List of globally banned users and checkuser found that Aminnie is not related. The SPI...
Click to read more »--Eptalon (talk) 17:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Anyone wanna guess which recently banned user this probably is. -Djsasso (talk) 20:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Not...
Click to read more »communist states have been similarly uptight, plus bans on speaking against the state, plus bans against unauthorized printing. The issue of words-you-can't-say...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam created by WMF-banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. MER-C (talk)...
Click to read more »I found no sign of this person, the person who created this article is banned on enwiki for hoax creation. Dylan | ✉ | ✓ 19:31, 20 May 2023 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki spam by banned WMF spammer Bodiadub, see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bodiadub...
Click to read more »page for deletion for the reason: cross-wiki ad spam, created by globally banned user. Already deleted in bunch of Wikipedias Renvoy (talk) 15:17, 5 June...
Click to read more »Caste-warrior stuff created by a a presumably block-evading IP editor (now proxy-banned) asilvering (talk) 04:22, 23 March 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam created by WMF-banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. MER-C (talk)...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Speedy delete as it was created by a blocked/banned contributor, see w:en:WP:LTA/Alec Smithson.--A09 (talk) 17:33, 12 March...
Click to read more »our policies differ from enWP, particularly in relationship to blocked or banned users. I'm hesitant to issue this flag at this time, but bumping it over...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Comment: — Creator of the article is banned on enwiki for hoax creation en:User talk:Limeisthebest123#April 2023 — Dylan | ✉ | ✓ ...
Click to read more »administrators' input at AN - unless it's a user who is the subject of a ban. Question 2... If a user is spamming they should receive, imo, a spam4im...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:20, 6 August 2021 (UTC) Comment Since this was nominated by a banned user, wouldn’t the same criteria from EN Wiki apply where it is an automatic...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete non-notable person and original article creator has been banned on en.wp. --Ramaswar(discuss) 08:42, 7 November 2021 (UTC) Delete yet another...
Click to read more »Already deleted and salted. We've had this discussion before, the user's banned, false information etc. Qualifies for QD a few times over. --Ferien (talk)...
Click to read more »long. We would like to make the minimum be 8 letters (bytes) long and also ban certain really common passwords. By increasing requirements on passwords...
Click to read more »12:03, 9 January 2009 (UTC) Vote struck (2x) - new account1 of a cross-wiki banned user2. --Creol(talk) 06:49, 12 January 2009 (UTC) Strong support Excellent...
Click to read more »19 January 2009 (UTC) Tharton, what was this about? "To avoid getting banned"? — RyanCross (talk) 18:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC) The above adminship discussion...
Click to read more »edits, I'm wondering whether it's time to stop this from happening by banning unregistered users from creating pages on the wiki - if you get what I...
Click to read more »(UTC) Hello all, I think it would be good to have a guideline on community bans- In my opinion this guideline could help us, in the following ways: Standardise...
Click to read more »(UTC) Seriously, don't tell anyone you're a banned user, and you'll be fine. Or, perhaps, sit out your ban, and come back and be a productive editor. Your...
Click to read more »sockpuppetry ban on the English Wikipedia. Yes, the ban was due to sockpuppetry, but the sockpuppetry was made evident by those issues. Her ban was also reviewed...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam created by WMF-banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. The previous...
Click to read more »people, but this has now been identified as sockpuppetry. Users have been banned. Most of the author's work is self published. There is an article on English...
Click to read more »leave and let you run your wiki-kingdom in peace. What are you going to do, ban me now for make my opinion known? 216.56.27.87 22:41, 26 August 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »with fascism / national socialism, the ideology and symbolism are only banned in a few countries (mostly in Europe). The Swastika has been in use as a...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam created by WMF banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. MER-C (talk)...
Click to read more »article was previously up for RFD and was voted to keep all by globally banned users and sockpuppets. I am not sure this article is notable either. Shoot...
Click to read more »un-related collateral damage regarding a cross-wiki issue with a now permanantly banned user. The Jan 09 blocks were me trying to get away from Wikipedia as I was...
Click to read more »relationship to each other. Would that have been acceptable? Or, is there a blanket ban on QD of any article titled "List"? If so, that should be added to the documentation...
Click to read more »We're all for allowing people banned and blocked elsewhere to have a fresh start here. But User:Wwikix is topic-banned on nlwiki and indeffed on enwiki...
Click to read more »with their second edit here making it 1/2 an RfA for User:Example (who is banned with 5 edits).. It was never added to the RfP page in the first place (likely...
Click to read more »someone is able to) than to label them all as npov, and possibly scare or even ban the editor for what they did. At the moment the idea is about getting the...
Click to read more »pursuant to the global ban policy, I would like to notify your community I have proposed that User:Eric abiog to be globally banned by the global Wikimedia...
Click to read more »15:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC) The user name "Kevin_(_________)" has been banned from creation. It matches the following blacklist entry: .*Kev.* I have...
Click to read more »have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? I'm banned on EN (for another 35 days or so), everyone knows it. I've learned from...
Click to read more »Since the request at meta:SRG isn't moving. I can't support deletion with banned contributor. A4 might be controversial. Hence, a RFD with rationale of non...
Click to read more »Oghenevwegba Ogedegbe, which is a page that was deleted many times and creation banned. Page name just changed to avoid protection. Previously discussed at en:Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete Mastashat is banned now but i find this source: https://www.rollingstone...
Click to read more »"delete", such as merging. Comment: Might I add, the user who created this is banned on enwiki for abusive socking. RiggedMint 14:24, 20 December 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »person at all except for their youtube channel, creator of the article is banned on enwiki for hoax creation. Dylan | ✉ | ✓ 19:33, 20 May 2023 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam created by WMF-banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. MER-C (talk)...
Click to read more »this page for deletion for the reason: Undisclosed paid-for spam by WMF banned spammer Bodiadub (see m:Wikiproject:Antispam/Archives/2021/Wikibusiness)...
Click to read more »than listing the shows. The article is written by an IP that is currently banned on en for vandalism on the article there. Please discuss this deletion below...
Click to read more »November 2009 (UTC) Kennedy is right, one of the biggest reasons he was banned was his attention to non-article things such as being too myspacey as you...
Click to read more »if a banned user comes back to write a legitimate article—rare, but it happens—we don't demand that it be deleted just because the user was banned. In...
Click to read more »after only two vote, it was started by Kalajan (who every knows is now banned). Maybe it should be "decommissioned"?-- † CM16 t c 22:14, 4 March 2009...
Click to read more »been named Punk Boi 8, Spiderpig0001, and Da Punk '95 At a time when I was banned and wasn't watching SEW, there was a controversy at Da Punk '95's RFA, linked...
Click to read more »vocabulary, at first read, I thought you were telling the contrary : that you banned this vocabulary because of simple norms, and that you would need to use...
Click to read more »like "hacksrus" which has the local version, because the word "hack" is banned. I thought Opera was a browser. Is the IRC integrated into the browser?...
Click to read more »November 2008 (UTC) CM16, yes i actually do know your history. You are banned there (just stating the fact), and that wasn't the only oppose rationale...
Click to read more »Trustees Special Note: At the time of nomination or election, you may not be banned or blocked from any Wikimedia project for a period of 30 days or longer;...
Click to read more »Admins need decent experience with the deletion policy, the blocking/banning policy as well as dealing with difficult users, policies & guidelines to...
Click to read more »categories which appear to breach our policy. I would like to see a way to ban unregistered users from creating categories: it is not a matter for random...
Click to read more »being the same person I am concerned about. Pretty sure she is one of a banned individual. That being said. I am now really concerned with her reply to...
Click to read more »part of the regular deletion process) If the user is not under a long-term ban, and that the page does not violate any policy, there is no reason to delete...
Click to read more »outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. article created by a banned enwiki sock, who was also using socks to support his case. The article was...
Click to read more »without copyright infringement.[2http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/24/banned-baby-names_n_5134075.html2] I remember that until quite recently Norwegian...
Click to read more »as I don't like to say this, we have over fair share of editors who were banned on EN, coming here to cause trouble. That number seems to be going up lately...
Click to read more »for the following reason: The title "Afesha Olton-Humphreys" has been banned from creation. It matches the following blacklist entry: .*\x{00AD}.* <casesensitive>...
Click to read more »informative. But I'm not getting into a fight like this again cause it got me banned on enWP-- † ChristianMan16 22:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC) There is a thin...
Click to read more »above. Nevertheless I think those additional tools (page deletion, user banning) would give her nice additional frills to play around with. I fully trust...
Click to read more »(talk) 23:16, 29 September 2021 (UTC) Just found out he is a sockpuppet of banned user User:UnknownEditor1234567890. I feel stupid for being so nice. Blissyu2...
Click to read more »(talk) 06:14, 21 May 2020 (UTC) @Eptalon: this was a well known globally banned LTA. IWI (chat) 18:29, 22 May 2020 (UTC) I'm trying to make a Simple English...
Click to read more »productive.It's stuff like Explicit images that has gotten this website banned from Polk County Public Schools (Florida) servers.-- † ChristianMan16 ...
Click to read more »reverting vandalism-related changes; For us admins, admin-related work like banning users also does not count, of course. That number is a guess of mine, based...
Click to read more »here, at least being semi-active. However it is soon forgotten as several banned or blocked users started causing distruption here. There were several users...
Click to read more »politics from the 1950s onwards. Article was deleted from EnWP ("created by a banned user"). We don't have that policy, and the person may be notable as a local...
Click to read more »for deletion. I am still gathering facts about her, I hope it won't be banned to wikipedia infinitely. --— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosalina...
Click to read more »situation within the next few days, without even needing a ban proposal (be it topic ban or the ban that requires a particular special page). Chenzw Talk ...
Click to read more »stated at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BZPN, recent UCOC case and discord ban. Build more trust first.--Plutus 💬 🎃 — Fortune favors the curious 08:42...
Click to read more »hii) 19:56, 29 July 2019 (UTC) Delete Created by an LTAer and a globally banned editor. See the deletion log of this page: en:Draft:Taib_Šarić. Other than...
Click to read more »disruptive editing. given this edit, they admit to being a banned en.wiki user. So whe are talking banned en.wiki user engaged in disruptive editing here. Pure...
Click to read more »see CA,en:Wikipedia:Blocks and bans#Reciprocal.--MCC214 (talk) 10:24, 17 September 2022 (UTC) @MCC214 Is it a global ban/block? SoyokoAnis - talk 13:26...
Click to read more »September 2011 (UTC) Anything to do with changes that affect users (be that ban discussions, RfXs and such like) then I'd agree, but we do that already....
Click to read more »level of detail we think best for us. We could even delete some boxes, and ban re-creation. Also, we need to stop this sort of thing happening in other...
Click to read more »this editor should be reverted unless obviously good. I have extended their ban, but am unable at the moment to handle the edits (personal issue). Revert...
Click to read more »persevering as a community from all onslaughts, whether it be vandalism or banned users from the English Wikipedia. I hereby award all active editors in this...
Click to read more »to make things easier to navigate through. Also created by a blocked or banned user. Depextual (talk) 00:46, 27 November 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this...
Click to read more »Cited/Somewhat expanded article[1], I tried adding the source from EN but it's banned so had to settle with crappy ones, Still does the job I suppose. Anyway...
Click to read more »14:09, 28 June 2026 (UTC) @椿: Liberally Network is likely a sockpuppet of a banned account. See Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Zhongli (Genshin...
Click to read more »a point-of-view pusher, or accusing them of being a sock puppet or of a banned or blocked user are common false narratives. Editors may also misrepresent...
Click to read more »toolset to use in cases of vandalism, cross-wiki abuse, long-term abuse by banned editors and in other cases where access to private information such as a...
Click to read more »agree with a one strike rule (which he would be under anyways due to his ban on en) but I think it should be clear that a strike could come not only from...
Click to read more »8 January 2025 (UTC) Delete Instantly and investigation of criteria to ban whoever made this. This is awful. I say that because it must've been some...
Click to read more »an account. User rights cannot be given to IP editors. You must not be banned when you ask. You should have made about 50 changes or more. If you have...
Click to read more »amount of dedication to this project. You've stuck with us through the "Banned User Days" and the "VGA Icon Days", while I've been too chicken. :-P Cheers...
Click to read more »define a yes from a no and other things will help or hurt (admin experience, banned sockpuppeteer, low number of comments but always dead on in policy and demeanor...
Click to read more »edited. Bobo and the Yaka vandal get into a minor edit skirmish. Yaka gets banned and Bobo stops editing at the same time. Highly coincidental timing there...
Click to read more »checkuser (log)) Given Ornamentalfun's user talk, there's a good chance he's banned user Freddy, per WP:AN#Reversion of edits ("Yes there is a rule that dates...
Click to read more », removal of all admin functions for the abuser, blocking or possibly banning the abuser, and reinstate the admin victims). Also we should form policies...
Click to read more »aren't many pageviews from China, but that might be because Wikipedia is banned there and they use VPNs that appear to be from other countries. How much...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC) Well it seems like they've been global-banned, we should be good(?) neptunepie | chat? 15:13, 13 June 2022 (UTC) They...
Click to read more »can not rule out that at least one person is too close to the issue; Topic bans are sometimes considered when someone appears to be too close to an issue;...
Click to read more »that we don't delete based on editors here. If it was made by an LTA or banned user, we don't delete it because of that, especially not quick delete. If...
Click to read more »5 April 2009 (UTC) Indeed, it is so wrong of me to want users banned on EN to be banned here...! Soup Dish (talk) 15:09, 5 April 2009 (UTC) It is if they...
Click to read more »a keep. The only cavaet is that the closing admin, CCF, is now globally banned per Office Actions, so this determination might require review. Hence, I...
Click to read more »is standard policy on en to revert all edits of a banned user. Even if FDR is not actually banned, just blocked, I think its a case of WP:IAR to do so...
Click to read more »11:59, 19 August 2025 (UTC) I am well aware what he mean. I somehow doubt banning people from even saying the name of other categories is gonna help consensus...
Click to read more »notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:15, 20 February 2016 (UTC) I don't see its banning by one government as changing its basic non-notability. Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »he has used since his block on Oct 19. This does not include the multiple ban evasions he has committed since using IP edits since his block. -- Creol(talk)...
Click to read more »record G5 only applies to pages created by a blocked or banned user who is evading their block or ban when the page was created (emphasis mine) rather than...
Click to read more »things that were courtesy blanked, and userpages and user talk pages of banned users. I would like to recommend to the community that we enable checkusers...
Click to read more »German Wikipedia, the article on English Wikipedia was deleted (created by a banned/blocked user). The first page of google hits is essentially social media...
Click to read more »administrative closure of this RFD may be appropriate as it was created by a banned sockpuppet. Griff (talk) 20:15, 5 February 2022 (UTC) Delete. I don't see...
Click to read more »January 2026 (UTC) G5 would also apply here as the page has been created by a banned/blocked user. -Barras talk 11:03, 4 January 2026 (UTC) @Barras: true, as...
Click to read more »Arnejo which was deleted some days ago because it was made by a blocked/banned IP address. Aster🪻 talk edits 13:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »mention this in the previous RFA), it is important to note, that I was banned from the en wiki REVDEL channels, however, as you can see, this happened...
Click to read more »accused of being a sock of me regardless of proof to help them justify a ban that was never valid and never had any justification. Since this project...
Click to read more »Rollback was removed as a procedural matter relating to my longstanding ban in relation to the one I had on enwiki. Since it wasn't taken away on grounds...
Click to read more »of these fake checkuser requests will be very helpful to the campaign to ban me. Snow funn at tall (talk) 14:47, 21 April 2009 (UTC) It was indeed a sock...
Click to read more »areas that administrators deal with quite often, which includes blocking/banning, vandalism fighting, protection, and deletion. The point that Synergy made...
Click to read more »bigger problem, just list on vandalism in progress, but since he's not even banned on en at the moment, I don't think we should be auto-deleting everything...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Support - Robert Sieger (talk) 23:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Banned crosswiki vandals do not get a vote. --Creol(talk) 07:55, 28 January 2009...
Click to read more »Delete as it was created by a now banned user.-- † CM16 20:08, 8 April 2009 (UTC) User:Æåm Fætsøn is not banned. Either way (talk) 10:50, 9 April 2009...
Click to read more »06:09, 11 November 2016 (UTC) Please block, spam only account, already banned on enwiki, metawiki and mediawiki--HakanIST (talk) 09:06, 11 November 2016...
Click to read more »in English. This was originally nominated as QD G5 (created by blocked/banned user), but I'd prefer a community discussion. I am aware that identifying...
Click to read more »ofcourse I was a good contributor to other wikipedia pages was banned until on august this year a ban of almost a year simply because I started a page without...
Click to read more »promotion by Parvej Husen Talukder (according to their website) who are banned from simple wiki. (Likely MetaContributor is Parvej Husen Talukder new sock)...
Click to read more »article was QD'ed on the grounds of having been created by a "blocked or banned" user. And I have no way to know whether that, or COI/self-promotion, or...
Click to read more »June 2012 (UTC) A: Generally, the banning process should follow first warning -> second warning -> final warning -> ban. But in extraordinary extreme cases...
Click to read more »indefinitely from the English Wikipedia. Both were blocked after violating topic bans in relation to editing Kurdish and Assyrian related articles. Etcnoel1 has...
Click to read more »deal with each and every day. I re-read intensively Wikipedia:Blocks and bans, en:Wikipedia:Notability, Wikipedia:Protection policy, Wikipedia:Deletion...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:04, 6 January 2010 (UTC) Speedy delete. This was created by a hard-banned, cross-wiki vandal who has been messing up a number of Wikimedia projects...
Click to read more »11 September 2010 (UTC) Delete Delete as POV-pushing article, created by banned editor... imho, it could have been deleted without RfD for these reasons...
Click to read more »support from people. Either way, it hasn't worked on me, sorry mate. Also, bans and blocks are both different things, and the fact that they are both used...
Click to read more »since our policy does not permit blanket deletion of articles created by banned users). The book exists, but I cannot find any independent review of this...
Click to read more »reliable sources, and the fact that it had caused trick-or-treating to be banned for 15 years sets this case apart. -- *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:35, 30...
Click to read more »is not judged for real-world balance, but instead the people are topic-banned depending on who was tricked into becoming the most angry during debates...
Click to read more »first hit. This was proposed for quick-deletion (G5-created by blocked or banned user), but I'd prefer a community discussion. It might be that this society...
Click to read more »the institution. Additionally, this article was created by the globally banned User:Memoli13, who was involved in undisclosed paid editing. He and his...
Click to read more »common? Some meats are only common in some places. Commonly what? Eaten? Banned? Chenzw Talk 03:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »WikiGnomes, editors which do work behind the scenes. WikiFallens, editors banned from the wiki. WikiLions, bold editors. WikiFairies, editors helping "beautify"...
Click to read more »deleting them. The only template that I think is fine to keep is {{WMF-legal_banned_user}}. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 04:34, 13 July 2024 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »hoax created by the author of the article. The user have previously been banned from Wikidata for this very reason. --Trade (talk) 19:33, 22 May 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »with a summary indicating a QD tag were in his own user space. No need for ban - Three Vip reports at end of August, 1 back in June. Extremely low main...
Click to read more »StraussInTheHouse (talk) 14:11, 13 January 2019 (UTC) Comment:I raised up the issue of banned contributor as the creator is a sock of globally locked user which any contributions...
Click to read more »wikipedia site!!! I would like to think that having banned him from one wikipedia, I can get him banned from all wikipedias, for the good of everybody. Failing...
Click to read more »filled with gas lighter than air ballot – n. a piece of paper used for voting ban – v. to not permit; to stop; n. an official restriction bank – n. an organization...
Click to read more »with enwp article. Rather than quick-deleting (G5- created by blocked/banned editor), I'd prefer a discussion, so: keep or delete? Eptalon (talk) 09:06...
Click to read more »anywhere. The En article on the topic was deleted as it was created by a banned user/sock so this would likely count as cross-wiki spam. --Creol(talk) 22:31...
Click to read more »would call notable, also confirmed that it's a hoax. Also, the IP should be banned/blocked now, after all these transgressions and the two hoaxes. 🪐 Haumeon...
Click to read more »different IP (ranges); That was checked at the time, when Benniguy was banned. Personally, I have seen them as acquaintances; possibly best friends, given...
Click to read more »MathXplore (talk) 12:39, 12 January 2022 (UTC) Delete more Wikibusines spam (banned by the WMF), see m:Wikiproject:Antispam/Archives/2021/Wikibusiness. MER-C...
Click to read more »articles based on who created them here. Being created by a blocked or banned user is not a criteria for QD. --IWI (talk) 12:37, 19 September 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »on the other hand, is not notable and was created by users previously banned for misconduct on Wikipedia, thus it should be deleted --TBCΦtalk? 15:05...
Click to read more »That's interesting. To clarify, the creator of the AFD was indefinitely banned - not the creator of the article. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Meeanaya]...
Click to read more »minor things). The admins were deleting revisions, deleting articles, banning users, responding to comments, and reverting vandalism. That's a lot to...
Click to read more »Can we please do the same or move it back into userspace? Since PBP is banned, I suggest User:Project/WikiProject Americans or something similar. Osiris...
Click to read more »This log documents completed deletion requests from July 2008. Television ban (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) Chenzw Talk has...
Click to read more »quite a few references. Article was nominated for QD (created by blocked/banned editor). So, dear community, keep or delete this one? Eptalon (talk) 09:05...
Click to read more »recently, has article at EnWp FrWp. Rather than quick-deleting (Created by banned/blocked user), I'd prefer a discussion. So: keep or delele? Eptalon (talk)...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam created by WMF banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. MER-C (talk)...
Click to read more »that was closed as keep. All the votes on the last RFD were from globally banned users and sockpuppets. Not sure if this is notable. Shoot for the Stars...
Click to read more »which the second account made it here. The master of the first account is a banned editor who also shows interests in this (by third account). Checking to...
Click to read more »09:01, 17 April 2016 (UTC) While that is so, what an editor did to get banned elsewhere is not our concern unless the same behaviour is exhibited here...
Click to read more »probably mean they're both the same people working from a proxy. I suggest banning the proxy. --S3CR3T (tell me a secret.) 02:13, 25 May 2009 (UTC) No, not...
Click to read more »wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:CountryANDWestern#pls_stop_banning_obamas_mangos_all_my_mangos_friends_got_banned https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cou...
Click to read more »adminship. He has great edits and is always assuming good faith. While I was banned he sent me emails as suggestions to get me unblocked. I thank him. VandalFighterFR(V)...
Click to read more »same page over and over. ALso something that has come up is that I was banned on the english wikipedia. That was two years ago and as you can see by my...
Click to read more »Mar 2004 Angela blocked "Hephaestos" with an expiry time of indefinite (Banned user Michael trying to Hephaestos' name) 02:44, 4 Mar 2004 Angela unblocked...
Click to read more »regional market (Ugandan and Kenyan politics) but important enough to get banned by a government in that market. --Gotanda (talk) 02:35, 23 March 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »tried to write about himself on the French Wikipedia, and his account was banned and his article was deleted. He tried to write about himself on the English...
Click to read more »problematic on this wiki, the global lock itself should not be seen as a ban of any sort (even de facto), otherwise it would be an abuse of due process...
Click to read more »staff members. The damage done by the IEP to en.wp exceeds that of many banned users. Why is there not an oppose section? My good will towards this program...
Click to read more »am a friend of Zarbon and I do not want these pages deleted here. They banned them from wikipedia but don't do it here. Dodoria 15:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Stuart Styron has been recreated three times by the globally banned user Styron111 (User:Registar5 latest sock). en.WP has salted it and the...
Click to read more »someone banned indefinitely on the English Wikipedia is an expert. SL93 (talk) 19:37, 21 May 2012 (UTC) I guess I shouldn't bring up your ban because...
Click to read more »only two edits and both are creating vandalism articles. Should they be banned?Naddruf (talk) 20:59, 19 January 2020 (UTC) Not yet. For one thing, user...
Click to read more »21:39, 12 September 2007 (UTC) Keep but Userfy - User:Kimberley Ashton is banned, and for good reason, and needs to have a page like this. However, the absence...
Click to read more »account, The Aviation Tracker is created just after RoyalEnfieldCT got banned for sock puppetry on English Wikipedia and this account start doing complex...
Click to read more »deletion/Requests/2024/Category:Women in Latin music; the cat is from the same banned LTA user. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 21:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC) Quick delete C1...
Click to read more »No sign of notability. TurboGolf 12:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Indented, banned user. Shapiros10 12:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Keep - The group is notable...
Click to read more »talk changes deleted page Narayan Arts (QD G5: Created by a blocked or banned user: Mass deletion of pages added by 2409:40E2:100F:DD3F:ACCD:71FF:FEA8:96A9)...
Click to read more »participated in an edit war, which I have learned from due to not being banned yet. I believe that I am responsible enough to use such a tool and I hope...
Click to read more »also would recommend that you create-protect this article as it has been banned on other Wiki's due to the desperate attempts of the author to get something...
Click to read more »purpose account. Started a discussion about a banned user, judging by the edits it could be the banned user they mentioned in the discussion. Just a hunch...
Click to read more »User:Eptalon, User:Barliner, User:Oysterguitarist, and User:Benniguy (now banned). All the conflicts that I've had with these users have resolved themselves...
Click to read more »count neutral votes. The vote of a user who was later found out to be a banned sockpuppet also affected the outcome of that vote. Huji currently has over...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete yet more cross-wiki spam by WMF banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. MER-C (talk)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Of note, but not really relevant. We don't delete articles created by banned or blocked users here. IWI (chat) 16:11, 27 July 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »recreated a page that was a copy of another page which ended up being made by a banned user. 172.112.210.32 (talk) 03:59, 29 March 2022 (UTC) That was an error...
Click to read more »deleted the corresponding article as the creation of a [sock of a] blocked/banned user.) StevenJ81 (talk) 15:00, 6 September 2018 (UTC) Authors have just...
Click to read more »and consensus on Wikipedia talk:AI generated content, it is currently to ban AI-generated content in its entirety, but it's quite difficult to determine...
Click to read more »still should be noted). Also appears to have been created in violation of a ban Naleksuh (talk) 18:02, 15 July 2020 (UTC) Please discuss this request below...
Click to read more »overfilled with ancient historic buildings. We'll see in due course whether the ban gets lifted by Parliament. It'll be controversial for sure. Macdonald-ross...
Click to read more »admins, while key neo-nazi-promoter admin Kubura just recently got global ban. I worked on that article on HR to make it notable there and it is quite...
Click to read more »clear-cut decision of right/wrong, but instead, all of those editors might be banned from changing those articles for 6 months (or longer). Starting a fight...
Click to read more »(UTC) A sysop can ban any users at a whim, while a ban cannot be lifted by other sysops without consulting the one having imposed the ban. How is that not...
Click to read more »-Liberator 06:12, 22 December 2007 (UTC) Vote invalid, as a sockpuppet of a banned user --Bärliner 22:35, 27 December 2007 (UTC) Delete per Nickm57. At best...
Click to read more »wiki in a much less offensive version. The editor who brought it over is banned on English wiki (see details) and we should show him/her no latitude. In...
Click to read more »2023 (UTC) Move per above. While WP policy says creations by a blocked or banned user should be deleted, I am more of an opposer to the rule, because one...
Click to read more »with the multitude".--♥Amy Ames♥ (inbox) 21:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC) sock of banned user -- Creol(talk) 22:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC) Support --Yegoyan (talk) 23:40...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete yet more cross-wiki spam by WMF banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. MER-C (talk)...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam created by WMF banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Wikiproject:Antispam/Archives/2021/Wikibusiness...
Click to read more »sarcasm. Policy against sarcasm: A policy proposal on Wikipedia to forbid sarcasm (no, seriously!). Wikipedia bans sarcasm: an UnNews story about the above....
Click to read more »on Simple was created by a sock of User:Alec Smithson, who is globally banned for long term cross-wiki abuse. He creates hoaxes and fake references. Voceditenore...
Click to read more »bored smashing and 50 ways to break YouTube videos. Having this YouTuber banned from entering Nintendo store after smashing Nintendo Switch 2 outside of...
Click to read more »of the Treccani Enciclopedia. This page was created by Alec Smithson, a banned crosswiki vandal and spammer, who uses spam, machine translations and other...
Click to read more »has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam created by WMF banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. MER-C (talk)...
Click to read more »article just now. They're obviously socks of one another and of the globally banned user. I've blocked them as such. Just looking for checkuser insight on other...
Click to read more »features, like: Editing your Monobook.js page Reverting Vandalism Rollback Banning and Blocking Policys - incuding things like dodgy Usernames etc Warning...
Click to read more »user. I'm sorry. --♥Amy Ames♥ (inbox) 21:20, 9 March 2008 (UTC) Sock of banned user -- Creol(talk) 22:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC) **As a 'crat Vector already...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Quick delete and block new articles with this name. He's been banned with multiple accounts from ptwiki and had articles deleted several times...
Click to read more »deletion/Requests/2019/Wikipedia:Simple Community response to the Wikimedia Foundation's ban of Fram on the English Wikipedia also suggests that the community is not...
Click to read more »collaborative environment. Thought about this while considering CM16's potential ban/edit restriction thread on AN. Please discuss this deletion below, but keep...
Click to read more »tell us nothing of the subject are basically useless. I think a blanket ban on mass creating of stubs would be a good idea to prevent this happening...
Click to read more »someone brings up something else that I missed. This link says that TDKR was banned in May(?) of 2021 in barwiki, but google translate doesn't translate that...
Click to read more »template to tell banned en users that they are welcome buut if they decide to continue their antics, they may run afoul of our rules and get banned. You have...
Click to read more »plagiarist of Wikipedia. Following a lengthy investigation, his account was banned on de.wiki and I think it's safe to say that this seriously challenges claims...
Click to read more »as merging. Speedy Keep - The rationale isn't valid even in Wikis with banned contributors (e.g. G3 in meta) as the article was extensively edited and...
Click to read more »(talk) 00:26, 2 August 2011 (UTC) Comment: Just because a user is blocked, banned or violating restrictions doesn't mean that everything he's been working...
Click to read more »15:28, 12 October 2016 (UTC) Delete. We are not a free hosting website for banned users, or indeed any users. The material is unencyclopedic and useless to...
Click to read more »Leilaotadi3 (talk) 18:25, 27 October 2025 (UTC) Administrator note: User has been banned for block evasion.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 16:15, 1 November...
Click to read more »India' that is being hoaxed here, the specific hoax that the creator was banned for). Gotitbro (talk) 06:43, 31 May 2026 (UTC) Merge/Redirect Sources do...
Click to read more »-DJSasso (talk) 13:55, 30 October 2017 (UTC) And yet, not long ago a user got banned, in large part for creating lists of scientists where most of the entries...
Click to read more »person. The only real notability I can find in a gnews search is that he is banned from youtube. Other than that... Even his Dogtv network doesn't appear notable...
Click to read more »June 2025 (UTC) Comment: tagged it for speedy. Recreation of article by banned user. -Barras talk 08:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request...
Click to read more »wiki, she's basically using an online translator to badly translate the banned English article. Freshacconci (talk) 16:34, 21 August 2008 (UTC) That is...
Click to read more »There are no obvious signs that the user is an insidious sockpuppet of a banned user or an agent of some secret government agency bent on the destruction...
Click to read more »65%. This includes all of the !votes below. One of the supporters is a banned user and strictly speaking should have his vote striked. That said their...
Click to read more »and the article itself. And deleted with G12 and G5 (Created by a blocked/banned/locked user, Copyright infringement). RiggedMint 09:09, 26 December 2023...
Click to read more »December 2023 (UTC) I found out Campaigningsource (talk · contribs) is banned on enwiki for promotion. I feel like he is just promoting their business/article...
Click to read more »necessary judgement that every administrator needs, then why haven't I been banned already for being disruptive? Why haven't I been argumentative? The reason...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Delete yet more cross-wiki spam by WMF banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. MER-C (talk)...
Click to read more »admin here, peeking in. Please note that SoyokoAnis is currently topic banned from using reverts/undos, Twinkle, RedWarn and other antivandalism tools...
Click to read more »Merge: Based on Brittanica, it did exist for a for a few years before it was banned. It was with another party, the Brunei National United Party, and you can...
Click to read more »locks, bans, sanctions Blocking policy Autoblock Guide to appealing blocks Blocking IP addresses Range blocks IPv6 Open proxies Global locks Banning policy...
Click to read more »aspect to me in an admin is patience and kindness unless an editor is worth banning. So because of your thanks log to other contributors and for the articles...
Click to read more »to review all the category work that Wwikix is doing here; that user is banned or blocked on nlwiki for disruptive category editing. See my comments at...
Click to read more »blocked? Oysterguitarist 21:34, 22 December 2007 (UTC) Nope, votes from banned users are disqualified. Archer7 - talk 21:53, 22 December 2007 (UTC) Question...
Click to read more »a copy paste of an article deleted from en:wiki which was created by a banned user and is in horrible condition which is an embarrassment to the wiki...
Click to read more »make a case for how you have changed since the issues around your community ban, and the issues late last year. Thank you for volunteering, and I do hope...
Click to read more »subject is describing themself. Blacklisted: Due to abuse, the source is banned on Wikipedia or is on the Wikimedia global spam blacklist. Note: This list...
Click to read more »Auntof6 (talk) 22:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC) Quick delete Made by a blocked/banned user. Asteralee 22:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC) @Asteralee: It doesn't look...
Click to read more »Dinafarahu (talk) 08:26, 31 October 2025 (UTC) Delete, Article was created by a banned user.Fankuru (talk) 17:54, 6 November 2025 (UTC) This request is due to...
Click to read more »English wikipedia? if we did that all good users on simple, we would have banned most of them since most are blocked vandals on enwikipedia, Majorly was...
Click to read more »Feininger. This one at least is simple. The editor did follow the letter of the ban by working through his user page, but not the intent. His other copied articles...
Click to read more »such as merging. Delete yet another instance of cross-wiki spam by WMF banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. MER-C (talk)...
Click to read more »to simple (most {not saying you} come here because they were blocked or banned on enWP) and create short articles on people not meeting any guidelines...
Click to read more »related to sock. Cross-wiki unwarranted edits have been reported and user banned. Admin review required. --~2025-30135-51 (talk) 14:33, 26 October 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Foundation's ban of Fram on the English Wikipedia Requests for deletion/Requests/2019/Wikipedia:Simple Community response to the Wikimedia Foundation's ban of Fram...
Click to read more »a globally blocked sockpuppet vandal. Yes, globally, which means he is banned from all Wikipedia, not just one portal. Refer to https://en.wikipedia...
Click to read more »instead of improving. She should be banned. Can you please run a checkuser if she is a block evading sockpuppet of the banned/kicked out editor of English Wikipedia...
Click to read more »deletion/Requests/2008/Susanne Pollatschek Requests for deletion/Requests/2008/Television ban Requests for deletion/Requests/2008/Template:B-Class Requests for...
Click to read more »and match it to her but we don't have a QD for things created by blocked/banned editors. We do however have spam and hoax so it could go for those. I figured...
Click to read more »throw out the baby with the bathwater. In other words, the reason for banning sock puppets is to protect the encyclopedia from bad edits, but if the...
Click to read more »(talk) 03:17, 5 February 2012 (UTC) I apologise, I didn't realise you were banned. I will leave a message with the maintainer today. However, it's not going...
Click to read more »