Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following one or more categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
the page as needed, but please use the talk page to make sure that other editors agree with any big changes. Shortcuts: WP:FAITHWP:FAITH WP:AGFWP:AGF...
Click to read more »much. Also, about your "weak" oppose votes at RFA: please remember to WP:AGF. Thanks, and have a good evening! :) Shapiros10 Flap the Yap 00:32, 21 January...
Click to read more »before I was blocked due to me using vandalism for everything instead of agf reversions by Auntof6. I would like to request to have this right back so...
Click to read more »Thien where the candidate, in my view, ironically violated AGF by telling another editor to AGF (the essay en:Wikipedia:Assume the assumption of good faith...
Click to read more »deletion by an editor who maybe did not follow WP:BEFORE, but when applying AGF, it is possible the nominator may not be aware of that policy. I believe...
Click to read more »CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:03, 6 October 2025 (UTC) Yeah, it becomes a case of AGF for the sources like any non-digital situation fr33kman 01:24, 7 October...
Click to read more »here to oppose me because I disagree with you. I think you did. I normally AGF, but you've left me none with comments like "Oh give me a break..." and "Fine...
Click to read more »of bad faith? Yes, AGF should not be a death pact, but this is honestly ridiculous. Ajraddatz (talk) 21:34, 25 March 2011 (UTC) AGF doesn't apply to RfA's...
Click to read more »this same info. Fail (slightly) to fall cleanly into a QD category while agf so brought to RfD --Creol(talk) 18:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC) Please discuss...
Click to read more »nominators claim One more non-notable form the same LTA Gotanda but while I AGF the claim has substance I'm not immediately able to verify it. However I...
Click to read more »should be a 'crat Soup Dish (talk) 12:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC) Going with AGF. Yotcmdr =talk= 13:52, 2 November 2009 (UTC) Support Per The Rambling Man...
Click to read more »#Weak Support A little too inactive for my liking, but I trust this user. WP:AGF. Shapiros10 21:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Yeah sure. Bit inactive though,...
Click to read more »Newpages with Twinkle}}, {{User favorite letter/English alphabet}}, {{User AGF}}, {{User Renewable Energy}}... If a bunch of people are going to use them...
Click to read more »sophisicated UPE piece, but having no edvidence otherwise, I am compelled by AGF to Keep--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:43, 22 January 2020 (UTC) I agree...
Click to read more »(UTC) And for you to have to ask "AGF or not?", I'm a little surprised. It's a basic tenet of Wikipedia. So yes, AGF. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:10, 7...
Click to read more »with an experienced user's help. Majorly talk 10:14, 11 May 2009 (UTC) WP:AGF and why not? I doubt he'd abuse the tools. NotGiven 10:38, 11 May 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »the most important trait of an administrator. And stop trumpeting AGF. We don't AGF in all situations or we would grant the admin bit to every editor...
Click to read more »online, and the article's presence helps to counteract harmful myths. WP:AGF also applies here, as assuming good faith would seem to mean assuming that...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Support - AGF I guess. Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 18:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC) Support as per noms, and also AGF. From experiences I have...
Click to read more »experiences I've had with you. AGF, WTHN. Really need to leave. Shapiros10 Flap the Yap 12:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC) Thanks for AGFing Shapiros. If it passes...
Click to read more »Looks like a test edit as opposed to vandalism. [4] [5] Note: Gray as well, AGF [6]. I am aware of the deletion, protection, and blocking policy. I will...
Click to read more »OR. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:26, 9 September 2013 (UTC) Whatever happened to AGF? I'm pretty sure we can be certain that the author is unaware that OR is...
Click to read more »would do a good job Kennedy (talk) 10:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Support AGF. Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 17:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Support & strongly...
Click to read more »since I get complained at everytime I oppose for those reason I'm just gonna AGF, and be on with it.-- Chris†ianMan16 t c r 03:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Changing...
Click to read more »comment added by Shappy (talk • contribs) 14:32, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Per WP:AGF I'm inclined to think this is premature without evidence. GARDEN 14:34...
Click to read more »you understand the subtleties of en:WP:SPADE, WP:BOLD, WP:CIVIL, and WP:AGF. You're a good editor and I appreciate the bot work, but I can't support...
Click to read more »bullet points at en:WP:NKICK, and presumably the sources back it up per AGF. I can't comment on their reliability or independence as I don't speak the...
Click to read more »general reference to a print source. I’m not able to verify this source, but AGF and on face value, it is an acceptable source even though we can't know what...
Click to read more »plural of userbox is userboxen. Transclusions {{User:Quantum4/Templates/AGF Userbox}} This user always assumes good faith. Transclusions {{User:Lauryn...
Click to read more »blocks and warnings you have received. :) I love the way you speak with AGF innocence, even though it may annoy some people. I hope you will try to edit...
Click to read more »10 May 2008 (UTC) Not the issue. That was considered yelling (and a WP:AGF violatition). -- Da Punk '95 talk 02:45, 11 May 2008 (UTC) I didn't use...
Click to read more »reached regarding this. I worked carefully to design this template to best AGF as well as possible. And like I said on its template doc page this template...
Click to read more »sophisticated UPE piece, but having no evidence otherwise, I am compelled by AGF to Keep--Tyronm.fultz (talk) 12:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC) @Tyronm.fultz:...
Click to read more »sandbox in the hope that he is genuine. WP:AGF DJSasso! :P Normandy (talk) 12:21, 19 September 2011 (UTC) AGF went out the window a week ago. We are on...
Click to read more »17 January 2009 (UTC) When you say rarely, that doesn't mean never. WP:AGF. Shapiros10 Flap the Yap 14:43, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Unfortunately you stepped...
Click to read more »would've written the same things Majorly did. Especially with the too much AGF stuff. Yes, second chances are OK but repeatedly standing up for someone...
Click to read more »also be seen as wanting to conceal the IP creation problem. So even if we AGF and then deem the page patrol issue not important, autopatrolled users shouldn't...
Click to read more »popping orange bars on my screen while I was dealing with his abuse. My AGF with him is long gone. I may be limited in what I can say due to WMF policy...
Click to read more »[[Special:Contributions/$1|$1]] ([[WP:Huggle|HG]]) undo-summary:Undoing own edit agf:Reverted AGF edit warn-summary:Level 1 warning re. [[$1]] ([[WP:HG|HG]]) warn-summary-2:Level...
Click to read more »31 March 2008 (UTC) So true, and unfortunately due to conflicts with the AGF policy and my pointy sticks, we can pretty much rule out using the sticks...
Click to read more »was "megafun" if he had nothing to do with Benniguy. Sorry if Im breaching AGF, but could I.R be a Benniguy sockpuppet? -- Da Punk '95 talk 22:02, 13...
Click to read more »although it was perceived that he ignored the warnings, we should always AGF in cases like these where the editor is (IMHO) editing constructively. Griffinofwales...
Click to read more »account does not resolve to any currently known user account. We'll have to AGF on this one Peter, sorry. fr33kman talk 06:40, 10 January 2010 (UTC) Pusyforlife...
Click to read more »reason together. 12:47, 23 August 2008 (UTC) The proposed page notes NPA and AGF. I think we should leave it at that and reject this proposal. To me (and...
Click to read more »there is no point in having the sockpuppet policy. I know it is a case of WP:AGF but this really does take the piss. (Pardon my french). If you allow this...
Click to read more »a link...). I am getting an idea as to who this user might be... but WP:AGF and all :). Goblin 12:40, 21 April 2009 (UTC) My !vote was not a PA to anyone...
Click to read more »(UTC) No issue; just please try to be more careful in the future and WP:AGF. Best regards, Vermont (talk) 12:18, 6 November 2019 (UTC) @Masumrezarock100:...
Click to read more »work here. - Æåm Fætsøn /ˈaɪæm ˈfætsən/ 09:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC) Support AGF, never really worked personally with him, but am confident he can do a good...
Click to read more »sit here on SEWP but I do and I was late getting back to it. You forgot to AGF. And then you went further by accusing me and Chenzw of impropriety. Fellow...
Click to read more »2014 (UTC) I'm not sure I understand the question. I'm seeing the rollback (agf), rollback, and rollback (vandal) options only once. I don't use those, though...
Click to read more »they intended to become active here and were instead scared away by this. AGF comes into play here, there is a very large leeway on what can be on a userpage...
Click to read more »still giving him the benefit of the doubt; maybe I should have pipelinked AGF in "assuming"? :) ). My main issue, is that the article would be deleted...
Click to read more »The following is something I wrote on the latest proposal to close a Simple English project. An idea I came up with recently, to prevent these perennial...
Click to read more »spent a little time looking over the happenings and despite my desire to AGF sometimes to an excessive amount, I find it very peculiar that he came back...
Click to read more »the anon, but it was also not vandalism and should have been undone as a AGF edit rather than a rather rude use of rollback (which is only for definite...
Click to read more »first account (User:Andrew from NC). After his apology note on ST, we could AGF and simply block rather than ban. --Gwib -(talk)- 13:31, 23 August 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »SteveTalk 11:17, 31 January 2009 (UTC) Support - Per community consensus and WP:AGF. Good luck with the tools and godspeed. --§ Snake311 (I'm Not Okay!) 11:41...
Click to read more »involve issues of WP:V, WP:RS and WP:OWN; very few boil down to WP:NPA or WP:AGF. I'd recommend that something along these lines be tried here, perhaps third...
Click to read more »it may be, and has violated clauses such as en:WP:Harassment#Threats, WP:AGF, WP:Civility, and WP:NPA. It's not a user warning; it's a threat. If you...
Click to read more »wiki to change. I find it extremely amusing that you constantly trumpet AGF, when you are totally assuming bad faith on behalf of editors who also edit...
Click to read more »only page I actually protected was Biden; Creol protected the other pages. AGF is a good think to have. Nevertheless I think that certain pages should really...
Click to read more »of restraint in the use of the tools that is admirable. I am also one to AGF until proven otherwise. Yes, I am with JC in that certain editors can be...
Click to read more »--Peterdownunder (talk) 09:49, 20 October 2011 (UTC) All of these were done in WP:AGF because of these statements "These articles are based on (or exact copies...
Click to read more »k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 20:03, 21 May 2015 (UTC) Did an WP:AGF rollback on the last edit of Pythagoras. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:58, 21 May 2015...
Click to read more »order): AGF issues Not assuming good faith Not assuming good faith, accusing an anonymous editor of "harrassment" AGF issues again AGF Not sure if AGF issue...
Click to read more »could be useful) just ping to restore or ask on WP:RFU. Thus, all done per AGF. Barras (talk) 08:19, 28 July 2009 (UTC) Thank for your quick measures.--Nameless...
Click to read more »Wekeepwhatwekill 14:12, 2 October 2018 (UTC) @Wekeepwhatwekill: I'm aware of the IP. WP:AGF and/or WP:DENY apply here. This sort of comment isn't really necessary. Let's...
Click to read more »can leave it as it is. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:42, 28 December 2020 (UTC) Per AGF, I think the template should include a link to some kind of explanation....
Click to read more »page that starts with something like "Ok, I'll not do this" and "Ok, I'll agf. Ok!" as if there's a badly-programmed robot replying to the community's...
Click to read more »out there. If there is any blocks, I think is someone abusing it but yes, AGF can be important as this is a range with not a small amount of collateral...
Click to read more »three consecutive edits, where the last is complete vandalism (obviously no AGF anywhere) then it makes sense to rollback. This is much quicker and then...
Click to read more »inference. I was trying to infer Deppiyy's motivation and also Wikipedia:AGF. Derpdart56 (talk) 17:42, 9 March 2022 (UTC) Italian people - is that the...
Click to read more »This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block...
Click to read more »completly against AGF. You're assuming he's guilty until proven innocent. Yottie =talk= 17:07, 6 January 2010 (UTC) We don't automatically AGF for someone wanting...
Click to read more »take part if you don't like it. Majorly talk 16:38, 1 January 2009 (UTC) AGF is about assuming someone won't abuse or do something in bad faith. I am...
Click to read more »Creols concerns are very valid and IMO require no appology, you don't have to AGF in Rfa when it comes to deciding if you trust someone. -Djsasso (talk) 15:16...
Click to read more »"ANY violation [by BG7] of WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF etc., and [a block]'s back on, for longer. diff. BG7 was uncivil/AGF to Jona last week and to me yesterday,...
Click to read more »probably gotten the attention of a few xwiki users? You keep talking about AGF but you've done nothing but berate and accuse me and Nick misbehavior. And...
Click to read more »I am of seperate thoughts on that idea, and neither of which is exactly AGF in reguards to anyone who might be a potential user of that IP range. Leaving...
Click to read more »ST? --Ferien (talk) 22:54, 20 February 2022 (UTC) Gotanda Please keep WP:AGF in mind. --IWI (talk) 12:50, 21 February 2022 (UTC) As Ferien supposed, I...
Click to read more »clicked on the link, it came up as a dead link. I'm, personally, okay with AGF as if it were a book in a library. But if you can get some online sources...
Click to read more »Majorly talk 20:07, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Support I have been trying hard to AGF on this one since its clear people here believe in giving banned en users...
Click to read more »down the problem, maybe we can blacklist all articles containing "tehsil" (AGF?) and continue to establish communication. Chenzw Talk 23:32, 16 July 2008...
Click to read more »unrelated to the topic of the sub-page. I later TW reverted (AGF) my own edit and thought, nah, I'll AGF here and let it go. This, however, got me to thinking...
Click to read more »edits to that version (allows edit summary). rollback (AGF) - Labels the original edit as AGF in edit summary (allows edit summary). (preview) rollback...
Click to read more »27 November 2008 (UTC) Support Very good at deciding when and when not to AGF. Also, Matilda is very active and has brought much peace to the minds of...
Click to read more »concerned that they were hat collecting last time although I supported due to AGF. But since they disappeared not overly long after getting the flags (only...
Click to read more »hard to not envision images of socks and canvassing when this happens. Even AGF has its limits. Pure Evil (talk) 03:02, 14 June 2022 (UTC) Delete No amount...
Click to read more »Noted 7 (t ♡ c) 17:48, 12 April 2011 (UTC) @SEPTActaMTA8235:What happened to AGF? Have any of these users vandalized or used their accounts abusively? I don't...
Click to read more »70.184.171.16 (talk) 02:12, 7 January 2012 (UTC) Whatever happened to WP:AGF? Particularly, as the IP mentions, there has been an enWP name change request...
Click to read more »wants to make a positive contribution. I have always (and will continue) to AGF. If problems arise, then another block simply goes in place. Meanwhile, back...
Click to read more »He his only a human and makes mistake. Nobody is perfect. What is with AGF? He was a 'crat and so I think he did a good work. And now; Because of one...
Click to read more »think the lesson has been taken on board. ANY violation of WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF etc., and it's back on, for longer. BG7 is well aware of that. fr33kman talk...
Click to read more »a ban "per WP:BOLD". Clearly Yot overdid it this time, but I'm going to AGF that he really thinks, like Goblin, that this editor is a net harm. Still...
Click to read more »I didn't leave a message because hers were there for the same day. Tried AGF after several more reverted changes over a few weeks. The IP continues to...
Click to read more »User talk pages, where he has engaged in numerous debates and failed to AGF of other editors and admins but demanded to be treated with the utmost respect...
Click to read more »potential problems whatsoever. Also, watch your tone...it's flirting with AGF/NPA Purplebackpack89 Continually, ie more than once. Most people would stop...
Click to read more »users. Claiming I accused people to create drama is a major violation of AGF and your whole statement is outright abusive. I advise you to strike it immediately...
Click to read more »consensus otherwize said keep). We all make mistakes, and that is why WP:AGF exsists. No-one here is perfect. -- Da Punk '95 talk 07:19, 6 July 2008...
Click to read more »block me. Peter, please calm down and clear you head for a second so you canAGF and see this for what it truly is: a content dispute if not a simple error...
Click to read more »offending account/IP's talk pages, before I put in the ANI. I always strive to AGF, provide sufficient warnings. As a result, it sometimes leads some to a realisation...
Click to read more »Castilibrary2 editor, we tend to give that school a lot of leeway on notability. AGF to the max there. In Williams case, the Forbes list is one of the strongest...
Click to read more »6 March 2025 (UTC) Perhaps, and I remember seeing it there, but I'll WP:AGF here and hope they'll learn, as I did when I started editing on Simple, that...
Click to read more »benefit of doubt. --IWI (talk) 16:36, 5 April 2021 (UTC) Yes yes of course, AGF is paramount. But after a year of this, I think good faith can be thrown...
Click to read more »Normandie 13:17, 22 November 2011 (UTC) You lost AGF once you did something that wasn't good faith. That is how AGF works. Once you have shown that someone can't...
Click to read more »an admin. -DJSasso (talk) 00:26, 17 August 2011 (UTC) Per above, all for AGF but just too little activity for me to have built up trust, particularly...
Click to read more »account that is being used for positive purposes is OK. Please remember to AGF :) Shapiros10 Flap the Yap 01:23, 14 December 2008 (UTC) Not done - Even...
Click to read more »statement about his bad faith is at the same time a violation of the rules of WP:AGF and WP:CIV (because it is not substantiated by anything other than your own...
Click to read more »was said. That is grounds for an immediate block as you’ve exceeded your AGFs already today. PS it’s not 500 views in 30 days because it hasn’t been up...
Click to read more »'undisclosed paid editing/ WP:COI concerns' If more accounts are made, out of AGF, they will be warned, assuming that they ignore the warning, they will be...
Click to read more »of knowledge/experience before getting it. You don't AGF things like this, just like we don't AGF and make everyone an admin. Notgiven has no vandal revisions...
Click to read more »few questions for you. 1) If you become an admin, do you understand the WP:AGF policy and that you should warn vandals for a first offence and then block...
Click to read more »and it was provided by Cass, and Cass alone. I'd like to point you to WP:AGF and ask that you cross reference it with the en version. Both state: Saying...
Click to read more »Support - Despite the issues brought up below, I don't think it would hurt to AGF here. High activity levels, which I can see in Lugia's contributions, are...
Click to read more »hard to be sure and the best are highly skilled at tightrope walking, and AGF is of the absolute essence, all the while not allowing oneself to be suckered...
Click to read more »a checkuser. Chenzw Talk 11:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC) What happened to WP:AGF? I'd leave it, the closing bureaucrat can handle it. The Rambling Man (talk)...
Click to read more »(I say this without actually knowing for sure, but without any proof, I AGF). There's nothing to "tolerate" here, and it comes off sounding rather rude...
Click to read more »wouldn't make improvements in that case, either." Yikes, talk about lack of AGF! I asked once, let me ask again: Why wasn't the current lead sufficient?...
Click to read more »be welcomed. The welcome template contains all the rules of a wiki. So an AGF user will know the policy and will edit well. Now still if you don't like...
Click to read more »547 (talk) 10:11, 7 February 2026 (UTC) @HorseBro the hemionus please WP:AGF. The article is clearly a good faith effort by a legitimate editor. The editor's...
Click to read more »<Vermont> Isn’t a proxy, it’s a residential IP in Romania. <Vermont> I’d AGF, doesn’t seem to be an LTA at all. If it is, then they aren’t doing much...
Click to read more »where you reverted vandalism/test edits and warned them for violating WP:AGF. I am not comfortable giving you rollback just yet as there are still issues...
Click to read more »the current criteria for VGAs and not meeting the critera. I am going to AGF and give the benefit of the doubt as the article is very well sourced, and...
Click to read more »accidentally edit logged out. I do not know if that's what happened here, but AGF. Vermont 🐿️ (talk) 21:45, 20 July 2022 (UTC) Immortal Fact (talk+ · tag ·...
Click to read more »page) (Contributions) 10:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC) Hi @FusionSub, "Rollback (AGF)" is for reverting someone whos made bad edits (ie edit tests etc) but aren't...
Click to read more »new stub). It would have been more appropriate (in my opinion) to take an AGF approach. It was the immediate delete and block approach that I thought was...
Click to read more »to see it spilling over to here. Perhaps a reminder to Durjan to show WP:AGF towards editors and even when there's a one disruptive editor, it doesn't...
Click to read more »my vandalism reverts can speak for themselves, as well as my caution and AGF beliefs. I think I have the maturity and understanding of Simple to be an...
Click to read more »Eyes2005Talk 08:40, 7 February 2024 (UTC) (Non-administrator observation) Per WP:AGF, I would like to avoid labeling this as WP:SPAM, but I support the need of...
Click to read more »there has been some overlap with another account at the same ISP but I think AGF applies here. Thanks Eptalon fr33kman 19:25, 9 May 2025 (UTC) This section...
Click to read more »statement qualifies as a reason. Did the editor mean to lie in the intro? AGF and go with no. does it matter? not realy, it is still a blatenly false declaration...
Click to read more »to come here and ask what should be done about it (if anything). Go read AGF. –Davey2010Talk 14:19, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Also I came here for advice on on...
Click to read more »the edit and start over. AGF but accept this is not helping anyone. Pure Evil (talk) 04:18, 15 August 2023 (UTC) What does AGF mean? Kdammers (talk) 03:00...
Click to read more »get some minor or subtle vandalism. I tend to use "test edits" as a w:WP:AGF way to handle that. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:44, 15 October 2025...
Click to read more »comment added by Shappy (talk • contribs) 14:32, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Per WP:AGF I'm inclined to think this is premature without evidence. GARDEN 14:34...
Click to read more »evidence then I would like to allow further improvement in the userspace per WP:AGF, but I think there is a need to know their relations. MathXplore (talk) 01:43...
Click to read more »violation of WP:3RR and despite this warning, they decided to revert my agf rollback of their revert and then made an attack on me by their statement...
Click to read more »account does not resolve to any currently known user account. We'll have to AGF on this one Peter, sorry. fr33kman talk 06:40, 10 January 2010 (UTC) Pusyforlife...
Click to read more »September 2024 (UTC) Userpages both include "Teacher student from Norway", I'll AGF and assume they're two people collaborating in-person, which is fine. The...
Click to read more »situation. Pure Evil (talk) 22:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC) Level 1 is basically AGF, from level 2 and up is overt vandalism and worse. If it's vandalism I start...
Click to read more »deletion so I'm assuming this was an attempt at a sneaky article save? I'll AGF and assume this was a complete accident and that CooksAnna wasn't trying...
Click to read more »Ravensfire (talk) 14:12, 6 November 2023 (UTC) And in case any has any AGF left, creator is now blocked on EN as part of the Amansharma111 sock farm...
Click to read more »statements toward me, and others, were more civil, less personalizing, and more AGF. The same concerns could have been expressed entirely in terms of WP policy...
Click to read more »their edits or claim that they are vandalizing. I encourage you to read WP:AGF because we should assume that everyone has good intentions until we can prove...
Click to read more »comment and the opposition it attracted while closing, but I did extend WP:AGF quite a bit, thinking that they did not word it the way they wanted it to...
Click to read more »know Uanfala whose comment you have linked above, who was only assuming AGF, but if I was to ping him here and ask about your behaviour now [with the...
Click to read more »in advance, and sorry. Midtv2 (talk) 16:24, 10 November 2025 (UTC) Done, AGF fr33kman 05:53, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Template:ANI-notice Summary: Requesting...
Click to read more »over conduct concluded with his apology Yeah I was polite and decided to AGF, knowing that there was a language barrier. Today I noticed he removed the...
Click to read more »account that is being used for positive purposes is OK. Please remember to AGF :) Shapiros10 Flap the Yap 01:23, 14 December 2008 (UTC) Not done - Even...
Click to read more »good hand. The 4th is a new account but I am not holding my breath there... AGF only goes so far. Pure Evil (talk) 03:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC) I'll ran...
Click to read more »