Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following one or more categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
not been working on the article to give their opinion. Shortcut WP:3RRWP:3RR Because edit wars go against the idea of consensus, users who take part in...
Click to read more »block log you have a 2 day block for 3RR violations. What can you tell me about the 3RR today? Do you obey the 3RR/1RR now? What have you learned? Thanks...
Click to read more »users reverting their changes. If the tendentious user is not violating 3RR, or there aren't enough users involved to enforce Wikipedia policies: File...
Click to read more »broke 3RR. For a few of those reverts, you used "reverted as vandalism", whilst it was an edit dispute, which shows a misunderstanding of 3RR and what...
Click to read more »before. I don't see how this links in to 3RR though... I see edits from Wodan and Pmlinediter that break the 3RR policy (Well, my interpretation of it,...
Click to read more »Making inappropriate jokes {{subst:uw-joke}} Change warring {{subst:uw-3rr}} Changing between national types of English without a good reason {{subst:uw-lang}}...
Click to read more »Vermont was being overzealous in enforcing out COI policy there and violated 3RR. It was a mistake. I unblocked about an hour later after we discussed it...
Click to read more »of you individually broke 3RR, but between the two of you, you made 4 reverts in 24 hours, that would count as a breach of 3RR for each of you. Simple-wiki...
Click to read more »Making inappropriate jokes {{subst:uw-joke}} Change warring {{subst:uw-3rr}} Changing between national types of English without a good reason {{subst:uw-lang}}...
Click to read more »Warmly, – Katerenka (talk • contribs) 02:08, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Oppose. The 3RR block is too recent in my opinion. Too obsessive with edit counts at times...
Click to read more »least created a redirect for now. Also, should the wording on Template:Uw-3rr be changed also? It's possible there could be an argument that the Edit war...
Click to read more »26 February 2020 (UTC) This is technically a little close to 3RR where it isn't but 3RR doesn't need the time. The images are changed to a lower quality...
Click to read more »constant infighting over at our big brother. Tenuous editing, edit warring, 3RR; massive sockpuppetry; hundreds of blocks issued and pages deleted, AFD discsussions...
Click to read more »proceed that way. Remember 3RR is a hard rule, but edit warring at any level can result in a block. If you observe a 3RR violation in another user (or...
Click to read more »reversal, the BRD principle applies. I wouldn't go as far as saying that 3RR is the rule (anything more than 2RR is inappropriate [IMO] for an admin)...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) 3RR withdrawn as the article has been deleted by an administrator. Sunil The Mongoose (talk) 12:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC) FWIW, 3RR wouldn't...
Click to read more »change the rules with thorough discussion. When the people first came up with 3RR, they didn't say "no let's not" just because it could be counterproductive...
Click to read more »simple.wiki but only "content removal" and "edit war"). I didn't violate the 3RR rule because imho it was clear vandalism.--Superpes15 (talk) 01:58, 28 August...
Click to read more »9 September 2021 (UTC) @SHB2000: I did, but that tag was removed. Since 3RR vio may lead to a block, I could not revert anymore. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh...
Click to read more »when they have MoS "violations" but then he keeps reverting it until we hit 3RR. --SEPTActaMTA8235 (talk) 11:46, 6 April 2011 (UTC) If Ian is disrupting...
Click to read more »that would use erase to negate other contributions. The 3-revert rule (WP:3RR) is intended to limit edit-wars during a one-day period. However, unrestricted...
Click to read more »There's an edit war on Erica Durance. Technically, both users have violated WP:3RR. I guess the solution is for other people to discuss which is better, or...
Click to read more »Diffs of the user's reverts: 1 2 3 4 Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: warning for 3rr Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Conversation...
Click to read more »over the content in a page and have 5 reverts each, obviously breaking WP:3RR. The content is not vandalism and the edit-warring is seriously just pointless...
Click to read more »"final warning" and the editor's behaviour as violating the spirit of WP:3RR, even though more than 24 hours have passed between edits. Chenzw Talk ...
Click to read more »(bold-revert-discuss) principal. He would engage in brinkmanship forcing me to risk a 3RR ban when I tried to revert to the last stable version prior to having a meaningful...
Click to read more »and refusing the engage in discussion was, in a sense, an extension of the 3RR. The block was a temporary measure to force discussion, but resulted in a...
Click to read more »biased. He last reverted me and said he was going to bad, so, I reached my 3RR with one last revert with a edit summary saying that there is obviously a...
Click to read more »the editor refuses to relent and continues their behaviour, block per WP:3RR or WP:NPA, whichever comes first. Chenzw Talk 03:09, 18 July 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »how the accounts are involved in ILLEGIT. Is there vote stacking? Is there 3RR? In addition, are the accounts involved in any disruptive activities. Lastly...
Click to read more »end of each one. Thanks. As for your complaint, I think you both violated 3RR. When you saw that there was an issue with your edit, you should have discussed...
Click to read more »restriction was worded to permit that. Other blocks and bans (for example 3RR, and other issues) remain unaffected by this topical ban. I hope that I have...
Click to read more »consensus (i.e. mass deleting with flood flag) could be seen as an extension of 3RR (i.e. redoing the same action despite warnings to stop and failing to engage...
Click to read more »Is this a good or appropriate place to post these kinds of issues? A. The List of Emperors of Japan is a chronology. I plan to create 100+ articles with...
Click to read more »August 2021 (UTC) Just thought I would point out Naleksuh that WP:3RR says going past 3RR with obvious vandalism may not apply, it does not say that it will...
Click to read more »regardless of whether multiple editors agreed, 3RR still applies to you. Please note that future 3RR violations may result in blocks. --Ferien (talk)...
Click to read more »reference details, etc. are flexible stuff but straight vandalising and 3RR for protection etc. There is no harm in being able to say "I would start...
Click to read more »contributor to this page that caused 3RR issues and already blocked by BRPever. The 3rd user is a new user that is making more 3RR issues at the same page. They...
Click to read more »first time I've misunderstood 3RR so my apologies, Thanks , –Davey2010Talk 13:50, 15 April 2025 (UTC) No worries. 3RR isn't about policy, it's specifically...
Click to read more »context about heated content disputes and 3RR concerns appearing on-wiki: * Section: “Violation of the 3RR” * Prior admin involvement around topic disputes...
Click to read more »investigations/Hasanreels), and I consider this is an attempt to avoid WP:3RR restrictions by using many accounts. Can this be accepted? MathXplore (talk)...
Click to read more »response ImprovedWikiImprovment, Assuming that they both violated the 3RR, they will be both blocked, the standard blocking time for this is 24 hours...
Click to read more »IP has been edit warring since the beginning of July, I've given them a 3rr warning but I don't have much hope of them stopping so figured this would...
Click to read more »3RR: Rollback is not a right. Vandalism must be obvious....
Click to read more »These suggest that both users have the same intent (possible WP:DRV and WP:3RR evasion). Please also note that the 1st user is a possible WP:ONESTRIKE candidate...
Click to read more »based on WP:3RR issues, the article has been deleted by user:Vermont. Now, the article has been recreated by the 6th user and we are seeing WP:3RR issues again...
Click to read more »some time, I don't think that should be the end of it. BZPN violated the WP:3RR on Chinese herbology and then wrote (or generated) an essay to justify it...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) At this point, Rapta999 and Adelaideslement8723 are both past WP:3RR on the page. I'm not bothering to edit this or Dersim Ambush (2007), another...
Click to read more »SRGL. I also stated if they make another reversion it is a violation of WP:3RR and despite this warning, they decided to revert my agf rollback of their...
Click to read more »vandalism and always ensure my reverts are appropriate. I'm well aware of WP:3RR and use rollback responsibly. I'm also already autoconfirmed here. Additionally...
Click to read more »Regards, –Davey2010Talk 11:02, 18 June 2024 (UTC) I've pasted en:Template:Uw-3rr (3rr user warning) to their talkpage but the edit warring is still continuing[18]...
Click to read more »do a revert et cetera, if deemed appropriate?--I do not want to break the 3RR rule.--"The article's talk page", you might suggest? Fine, I have pencilled...
Click to read more »CU request was valid, and anyone can request CU. You were about to commit 3RR violations while removing that notice from the CU page. Thirdly, legal threats...
Click to read more »55.109 (talk) 15:26, 22 July 2023 (UTC) What is 3RR? Rathfelder (talk) 08:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC) 3RR is an English Wikipedia rule that prevents edit wars...
Click to read more »the diffs. Cactus🌵 hi ツ 10:29, 21 August 2025 (UTC) User also violated 3RR and edit wars Cactus🌵 hi ツ 10:30, 21 August 2025 (UTC) Thank you @Cactusisme...
Click to read more »accusations. Polygnotus (talk) 23:26, 10 July 2025 (UTC) And of course they broke 3RR on my talkpage. Polygnotus (talk) 23:36, 10 July 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »recently wrote an essay (WP:USERESSAY) about how, in my personal opinion, 3RR can be applied. However, some people have argued that my essay is "AI-generated"...
Click to read more »my name and religious beliefs. I have not reverted their edits due to WP:3RR. Additionally, I suspect that @2409:40D0:12D3:1A47:1956:7251:3EDF:D5F6 may...
Click to read more »Indigo ✩ 14:17, 24 July 2024 (UTC) Theorically they did not go against the 3RR rule, because they waited more than 24 hours, but they persist despite the...
Click to read more »discuss this on the talk page, but if there are further issues (such as WP:3RR) then I think protection would be needed. Comments? MathXplore (talk) 12:55...
Click to read more »CU request was valid, and anyone can request CU. You were about to commit 3RR violations while removing that notice from the CU page." - One you cannot...
Click to read more »(UTC) The main issues we've had on this article seem from 22 November where 3RR was not really followed, hence it looks like there's more vandalism than...
Click to read more »(Talk) 22:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC) I think what Twinkle also needs is the 3RR warning template, because on mine, I don't see it. ⭐ Adelaide Do you have...
Click to read more »