User talk:Tharnton345

Apology

I'm very sorry if I've helped Simple to get a bad reputation. I guess that every wikipedia user has heard about me. Even people outside the web. Just like Barrack Obama :`(

I know that I can control my maturity, but the reason that I am immature is because I have to different things that make me different from everyone else: Asperger Syndrome and ADHD. The former makes my brain work different from you guys' brains, and the latter is what makes my immaturity. Yes, I am one of our youngest editors (10 years old), but remember, anyone can edit Wikipedia!

Many wiki editors are concerned with my immaturity, and several users even hate me. I am like an island of immaturity in this mature wiki. My immaturity has caused my rollback tool to be removed, while everyone else has it :`(

As I said I'm very sorry for helping to get the wiki a bad reputation. Please lift the Community ban!!!. I will not be immature any more. And always remember this: Do NOT make the community ban indef. I will hopefully succeed my 6th request for adminship.

Yours sincerley,
TurboGolf

Put your comments here.

I come back to get the source code for my signature, and this is what I get? No, Tharnton. We don't hate you, but we have determined that due to your age and conditions, it is too difficult for you to professionally edit. Wait out the year and play outside a lot. And never mention the word RFA for a while, you're far too young and your immaturity will take a while to loose.

Now, go play football or something. Meetare Shappy ^Cunkelfratz! 11:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I just had to block User:78.144.172.188 as a sock puppet of you. This is the second time you have been caught using a sock puppet on here (at least). I don't see why we don't make it an indefinite ban at this point. Your edits with the sock show that you don't want to help Wikipedia either at this point. Either way (talk) 11:53, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Either way: Then you delete a page that the sock created under G5? Sorry - G5 is inactive. And you remove may comments as "banned user"? Sorry - not approriate.

Shappy: "When the year is out" is too long - 10 months.

Geez, guys, stop breaking the rules!

TurboGolf 13:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Definitely appropriate. You've banned. You don't get to come back and edit, leave messages, create pages, etc. If we allowed that, what would be the point of banning people? Either way (talk) 13:09, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm a consructive editor! One of our best. I guess I've lost trust :`( TurboGolf 14:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

And either way, your actions were ABSOLUTELY innapropriate. TurboGolf 14:11, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tharnton, if I were you I'd just drop it, wait for your ban to finish and start again then. Don't sock, don't ask or try to get unblocked, just wait. if you do this, one day maybe, you'll be highly regarded. Until that time, best of luck irl. Yotcmdr ^{=talk to the commander=} 14:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello all,

This is a move to discuss whether Tharnton345 should be re-admitted to our community. His talk page has been unprotected, and he is able to edit it. Here are a few links:

• Original ban discussion (and vote for community ban)
• Another discussion (ban after socking)

That is all that I will say for now, I will leave the wordy posts to others. --Eptalon (talk) 20:56, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

No. -DJSasso (talk) 15:01, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Maybe. Yottie ^=talk= 15:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

No per what Peter said on AN. It doesn't look like he's changed. Griffinofwales (talk) 20:55, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

• I like second chances. I would like to have him come back under a zero tolerance rule. We desperately need active editors here.--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 20:58, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
• No. Kate (talk) 22:00, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
• Yes. I have improved. I am over 10 and 3 quarters now. TurboGolf 19:26, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

• Age does not make one mature. You have not shown (to me) signs of the maturity needed to be a constructive member of our community. Griffinofwales (talk) 19:55, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

My ban should be pushed back to February 3 2010. I would really like to be back in this wiki. If you ban people, then we will fall apart and people's edits will be expunged because of this. I would really like to become an admin. TurboGolf 17:25, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Absolutely not. This user was one of our most disruptive editors to date, and therefore, I still feel the same way as before. He should be banned as was voted by the community half a year ago. Razorflame 19:02, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I came to this with an open mind. My mind has now reset to what it used to be. No. Socking, ban evasion, general immaturity. No. Goblin 19:04, 20 December 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Nifky!Reply