User talk:PieWriter

Esteban McKeever (talk) 01:53, 14 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you PieWriter (talk) 01:54, 14 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

At User talk:~2025-31357-25, you gave increasing warnings to the user 3 times, once at 01:08 and twice at 01:10. The user did not edit after 01:07. You have a first level warning and then a final level warning within 2 minutes and without the user ever editing in between. Warnings should not escalate with no other edits. You give the initial warning, then if they continue, you increase it. CountryANDWestern (talk) 16:24, 17 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I am new at this. Thanks for letting me know. :) PieWriter (talk) 00:25, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hey, Just wondering about if this "Quick:Deletion of talk space" deletes my talk space as I am using a different account because im on a different pc, just seen you deleted something there so just unsure ~2026-96555-8 (talk) 13:02, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

@~2026-96555-8 Please log in to confirm it is you, otherwise there is no way to prove you are that user. PieWriter (talk) 13:03, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

yes but im on a different pc in a learning institute where the internet is blocked so and i cant reset the password as thats also blocked. ~2026-96555-8 (talk) 13:04, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

The account you made the user talk page for doesn't exist on Wikipedia. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:05, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

oh, I wasn't aware. ~2026-96555-8 (talk) 13:06, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I have made the account. Ievante (talk) 13:08, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Happy 2026, PieWriter! That you have a great day on 2026! Ludo Games-T (talk) 21:53, 31 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Ludo Games-T Thanks, hope you also have a great year ahead. PieWriter (talk) 00:35, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

--Julius 12345 (talk) 13:02, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! PieWriter (talk) 00:32, 19 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello PieWriter. Thanks for checking new pages – it's a very important job! I'm just letting you know, however, that it isn't good to mark pages for deletion as having too little meaning (QD A1) and/or being fully empty (QD A2) right after they are started, as you did at Atmosphere of Titan. It's usually best to wait at least 10-15 minutes for more to be written if the page is very short; tagging these pages overly quickly might drive away well-meaning editors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), nonsensical pages (G1), pages that break copyright law (G12), complete vandalism (G3) and clear hoaxes (A6) should of course still be tagged and deleted right away. Thanks. Passengerpigeon (talk) 02:17, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Passengerpigeon You really think they are going to expand from “bbc”? PieWriter (talk) 02:17, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

It seems like an obvious troll. PieWriter (talk) 02:19, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I've seen that happen a couple of times, though I can't remember if the original user decided to stop messing around or if someone else noticed that the article had been created with a joking comment and stepped in to turn it into a real stub. Passengerpigeon (talk) 02:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

If someone wants to improve it, then they should be able to remove the template, I wouldn’t object to that. PieWriter (talk) 02:22, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Or I would myself remove it if I notice it expanded. PieWriter (talk) 02:23, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I would like to invite you to check if the Epstein files article looks good. In particular, I would like to ask you if the article does not have major mistakes or anything bad. I have made big changes on that article, particularly to a controversial topic (because it relates a lot to Donald Trump and political issues). Qwertyxp2000 (talk | changes) 10:15, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

The article looks okay from a quick glance but could be expanded based on content from En:Epstein files PieWriter (talk) 10:25, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yep, I was expanding part of En:Epstein files, but I wasn't sure what else in the English Wikipedia article is important but missing from the Simple English version of the article. Also, should I create a Header 2 called "Epstein list" to write down the definition for the theoretical list of notable people that Epstein trafficked young girls to? And is the lede clean enough to summarize the Epstein files, as in what the Epstein files are, what the Epstein files contain, a basic history of Epstein files and its reactions from the public, and the theoretical aspects that people have proposed? Qwertyxp2000 (talk | changes) 10:38, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

For the list you can include it in the article itself and probably create a redirect for Epstein list to the relevant section in Epstein files. PieWriter (talk) 10:39, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

The lede could be fact checked, I am unsure if the release on November 2025 is accurate or not. PieWriter (talk) 10:40, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

I also plan to rework the lede and move the Epstein list information to another section. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | changes) 10:53, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Great! PieWriter (talk) 11:10, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I updated the article. By the way, that section with the Epstein list info is also derived from English Wikipedia, but is severely lacking references. I tried finding some references to back it up, but I unfortunately didn't find all sources for the other parts yet. I first found an ABC News article about Elon Musk deleting the Epstein list posts he made on Twitter/X. I did the same adding of that reference for English Wikipedia. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | changes) 15:52, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Okay, for Contents, I have yet to add "2007 draft indictment", "2019 documents about investigation of alleged co-conspirators", and "investigation documents" from enwiki to simplewiki. Of course, with the proper Simple English. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | changes) 16:15, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Need help here. I can't report because of page protection are you able to? LuniZunie (talk) 04:00, 17 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nope, shows an error. Maybe ping an admin? PieWriter (talk) 04:01, 17 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Will do. LuniZunie (talk) 04:02, 17 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, PieWriter. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
Message added 00:15, 2 March 2026 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

--Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:15, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Replied! PieWriter (talk) 00:43, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply