Talk:Vocabulary

The amount of [not proven] tags in an article linked from the main page is not good. The facts written here, but tagged as [not proven], are cited (proven) in t

Too much using [not proven]

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The amount of [not proven] tags in an article linked from the main page is not good. The facts written here, but tagged as [not proven], are cited (proven) in the full English Wikipedia. It is good to encourage getting sources written, but for a newcomer the usage may be difficult. I will not remove the [not proven] tags from the article, but want to make a discussion (talk) about the usefulness of those tags on this page. They are clearly not needed. 91.152.239.135 (talk) 18:55, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.